Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Two Different CMV-Immunoglobulin Regimens for Combined CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients following Lung Transplant
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Microalgae Biodiesel: Current Status and Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/microorganisms11010035
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Essential Role of OmpR in Acidithiobacillus caldus Adapting to the High Osmolarity and Its Regulation on the Tetrathionate-Metabolic Pathway

by
Linxu Chen
*,†,
Xiao Liu
†,
Chang Gao
,
Yanan Guan
,
Jianqiang Lin
,
Xiangmei Liu
and
Xin Pang
*
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010035
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 17 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acidithiobacillus spp. are prevalent in acid mine drainage, and they have been widely used in biomining for extracting nonferrous metals from ores. The osmotic stress generated by elevated concentrations of inorganic ions is a severe challenge for the growth of Acidithiobacillus spp. in the bioleaching process; however, the adaptation mechanism of these bacteria to high osmotic pressure remains unclear. In this study, bioinformatics analysis indicated that the osmotic stress response two-component system EnvZ-OmpR is widely distributed in Acidithiobacillus spp., while OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. exhibited a far more evolutionary relationship with the well-studied OmpRs in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium. The growth measurement of an Acidithiobacillus caldus (A. caldus) ompR-knockout strain demonstrated that OmpR is essential in the adaptation of this bacterium to high osmotic stress. The overall impact of OmpR on the various metabolic and regulatory systems of A. caldus was revealed by transcriptome analysis. The OmpR binding sequences of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were predicted, and the OmpR box motif in A. caldus was analysed. The direct and negative regulation of EnvZ-OmpR on the tetrathionate-metabolic (tetH) cluster in A. caldus was discovered for the first time, and a co-regulation mode mediated by EnvZ-OmpR and RsrS-RsrR for the tetrathionate intermediate thiosulfate-oxidizing (S4I) pathway in this microorganism was proposed. This study reveals that EnvZ-OmpR is an indispensable regulatory system for the ability of A. caldus to cope with high osmotic stress and the significance of EnvZ-OmpR on the regulation of sulfur metabolism in A. caldus adapting to the high-salt environment.

1. Introduction

Acidithiobacillus, a genus of acidophilic and chemoautotrophic sulfur-and/or iron- oxidizing bacteria, is prevalent in sulfur-containing acidic niches [1,2].These bacteria could promote the geobiochemical circulation of elements and the release of heavy metals in mining-associated habitats [1]. Members in this genus have been widely applied in the bioleaching industry to recover nonferrous metals (e.g., copper, gold, or uranium) from different ores [3]. All strains of Acidithiobacillus possess the capacity to oxidize various reduced inorganic sulfur compounds such as tetrathionate (S4O62−), thiosulfate (S2O32−), sulfite (SO32−), sulfide (S2−) and elemental sulfur (S0) [2]. Additionally, some species, including A. ferrooxidans, A. ferrivorans, A. ferriphilus and A. ferridurans, can oxidize ferrous iron for autotrophic growth [4,5,6]. Extensive studies have been conducted on the three typical species of Acidithiobacillus: A. ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans, and A. caldus [7,8,9,10].
In the natural mine habitats, Acidithiobacillus spp. can metabolize the sulfur and ferrous iron deposited in minerals, generating the ion-enriched environments. For example, a sulfate concentration up to 7.9 M was detected in the water of the abandoned Richmond mine at Iron Mountain, California [11]. Metal ions, such as Fe3+, Cu2+, and Zn2+, are released from ores as the bioleaching reaction progresses. Dissolved inorganic ions exert multiple pressures on the growth of these autotrophic bacteria, including the following: the low acidity caused by the increase of sulfuric acid, the high oxidation potential generated by increasing ferric iron, the toxicity of heavy metals, and the osmotic stress caused by high concentrations of various ions.
Research has shown that inorganic ions and osmotic pressure are severe environmental factors for the growth of Acidithiobacillus spp. as well as the efficiency of the bioleaching of minerals. It has been reported that the inhibitory effect of Na2SO4 or K2SO4 is stronger than that of CuSO4 or ZnSO4, and weaker than that of KCl or NaCl [12]. Iron-oxidizing bacteria such as A. ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum ferriphilum are highly sensitive to the level of Cl− because of the inhibitory effect of chloride on ferrous iron oxidation [13,14]. The sulfur oxidizer A. caldus has a much higher tolerance of NaCl stress (1.0 M NaCl) than A. ferrooxidans (0.12 M) [15]. Conversely, other ions such as SO42−, Na+, and K+, have little effect beyond their influence on osmotic stress [16,17]. Thus, an elevated ion concentration will cause osmotic stress, which could restrict the growth of these acidophilic bacteria, and consequently, the bioleaching of sulfide minerals. The discoveries of compatible solutes (trehalose, glucose and proline) in several species of acidophilic bacteria and up-regulation of some proteins in the presence of NaCl stress in A. caldus, indicate that Acidithiobacillus spp. might employ different strategies to respond to osmotic stress [15,18].
The EnvZ-OmpR two-component system is well known to mediate osmotic stress response in bacteria [19,20]. In Escherichia coli, the histidine kinase EnvZ monitors environmental osmolarity and is autophosphorylated at high osmolarity, the phosphoryl group is then transferred to the response regulator OmpR [19,21]. Phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P) binds to the promoter regions of outer membrane porin genes ompF and ompC and regulates their expression according to the cellular OmpR-P level [22,23]. By the regulation of EnvZ-OmpR on OmpC and OmpF, E. coli could govern the outer membrane permeability and adapt to the osmotic stress [24,25,26]. In addition to osmoregulation, application of the EnvZ-OmpR system has been extended to the fatty acid receptor, peptide permease, flagella acid shock and stationary-phase acid tolerance response regulation [27,28,29]. Thus, it has become apparent that OmpR plays a central regulatory role in the expression of a large number of genes, including small RNAs [30], in response to various signals from the environment in a wide variety of organisms.
Genomic information implied that there may be EnvZ and OmpR analogs in Acidithiobacillus spp. [31,32,33]. Moreover, the role of EnvZ-OmpR in osmoregulation and the EnvZ-OmpR-mediated regulatory strategy in Acidithiobacillus spp. are still unclear due to significant differences in Acidithiobacillus spp. and heterotrophic bacteria with regard to energy metabolism, biosynthesis and growth environment. In this study, we analyzed the distribution of EnvZ-OmpR system in Acidithiobacillus spp., determined the function of this system in A. caldus responding to the high osmotic pressure, explored and identified the genes regulated by EnvZ-OmpR. Finally, an EnvZ-OmpR-mediated novel regulatory mode for the sulfur oxidation and osmoregulation was proposed in A. caldus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The strain A. caldus MTH-04 has been deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) under accession number CGMCC 1.15711. Starkey -S0 liquid medium and solid Starkey-Na2S2O3 plates for A. caldus growth were prepared as reported previously [34]. Chloromycetin, kanamycin, and streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to a final concentration of 34, 100, and 100 μg/mL in LB medium, and 60, 100, and 100 μg/mL in both liquid and solid Starkey media, respectively. The culturing conditions were 37 °C and 200 r/min for E. coli and 40 °C and 150 r/min for A. caldus MTH-04. The cultivation method and cell measurement for A. caldus were performed according to previously reported methods [35].

2.2. Construction of the ompR Knockout Strain of A. caldus

First, homologous 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of ompR were amplified using primers P1-F/R and P2-F/R, respectively. The products were further digested and ligated into the vector pSDUDI, generating the suicide plasmid pSDUDI-ΔompR. Second, this constructed plasmid was conjugated from E. coli SM10 to A. caldus according to a published protocol [38]. Single crossovers were selected on kanamycin selective Starkey-Na2S2O3 solid plates and confirmed by colony PCR using primers oriT-F/R. Third, the I-Sce I-expressing plasmid (pSDU1-I-Sce I) was conjugated into single crossovers to facilitate the second crossover and generate mutants. Finally, the ompR knockout strains were screened by PCR using two sets of primers, ompR-F/R and IHA-F/R, specific for the targeted ompR gene and the interior regions of the two homologous arms, respectively. Identification of the ompR-knockout strain was performed by PCR using purified genomic DNA (TIANamp Bacteria DNA kit, Tiangen, China) as the templates with three sets of primers (ompR-F/R, IHA-F/R, and LHA-F/R). The PCR fragments amplified by primers LHA-F/R specific for the lateral regions of the two homologous arms were sequenced for verification. Primers used in the construction of A. caldus ompR-knockout strain were listed in Table 2.

2.3. RNA Extraction and Transcriptional Analysis

A. caldus wild-type and mutant strains were cultivated to the 6th day in S0 media. Na2SO4 was added to the cultures at a final concentration of 0.3 M. After an additional 3-h-cultivation, the cultures were filtered through the filter paper to remove the sulfur granules, and all cells were collected by centrifugation at 8000× g for 5 min. Preparation of RNA for RNA-seq was according to [39], and the subsequent construction of cDNA libraries and RNA-seq were performed by Novogene (Tianjin, China) [39]. Genes with an adjusted p value ≤ 0.05, FDR (false discovery rate) ≤ 0.05 and fold change (FC) ≥ 1.5 were selected as DEGs.
Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to confirm the DEGs detected by RNA-seq. All RT-qPCR reactions in this study were performed with three biological replicates. The experimental method and statistical approach are performed according the previous report in [39]. Genes with FC ≥ 1.5, p ≤ 0.05 and FC ≤ 0.67, p ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively. The standard deviation (SD) value was calculated by using the Origin software, and the p value was determined by an unpaired t-test using GraphPad Prism software. A Bland-Altman limit of an agreement (LOA) plot was used to carry out agreement comparison of the results from RNA-seq and RT-qPCR. Primers used in RT-qPCR were listed in Table S1.

2.4. Expression and Purification of the OmpR Protein

The ompR gene of A. caldus MTH-04 was amplified with primers ompR02628-F and ompR02628-R (Table 2). The purified PCR product and pET-28a were digested with BamH I and Hind III, and the generated products were ligated together to obtain plasmid pET-28a-ompR. The sequences of the inserted ompR gene were verified by sequencing, and pET-28a-ompR with the correct sequences was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). The recombinant OmpR was purified with HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The concentration of purified OmpR was determined using the Bradford assay.

2.5. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)

To determine the Kd (dissociation constant) value and thermodynamic parameters of the interaction between OmpR and predicted OmpR boxes within the tetH promoter region of A. caldus, OmpR was titrated with the DNA sequence using a MicroCal iTC200 system (GE Healthcare). The purified protein was thoroughly dialyzed at 4 °C against TE buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]). The protein solution (24 μM) was titrated at 30 °C with a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) solution containing 2 μM OmpR box fragments, with 19 injections of 2 μL after the first injection of 0.5 μL and a time interval of 120 s between injections. The heat effects from a blank experiment (injection of OmpR into the TE buffer) were subtracted before the titration curves were fit to a nonlinear least-squares function. From these curve fits, Kd, the change in binding enthalpy (ΔH), and the binding stoichiometry were determined. The change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and the change in entropy (ΔS) were calculated using the equations ΔG = RTlnKd and ΔG = ΔH − TΔS, where R is the universal molar gas constant and T is the temperature (in kelvins). DNA fragments were obtained by PCR amplification using the different sets of primers listed in Table 2.

2.6. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift (EMSA) Assays

The G360 and T360 fragments were obtained using primer-pairs G360-F/-R and T360-F/-R, respectively. The generated fragments were purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Corp., Hilden, Germany) and concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 mL, 3 kDa Centrifugal Filter Unit (Millipore Corp., Burlington, MA, USA). EMSA assays were performed as described previously [35].

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Analysis and Comparison of OmpRs in Acidithiobacillus spp.

Annotations of published genome sequences for the Acidithiobacillus genus revealed the presence of OmpR and EnvZ homologues and the existence of ompR-envZ operons (Figure 1A). Comparison of amino acid sequences showed that OmpR and EnvZ in Acidithiobacillus are distantly related to the respective protein in E. coli. OmpRs and EnvZs from Acidithiobacillus show approximately 50% and 30% identities to the proteins in E. coli, respectively. An unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed for the predicted OmpRs from some Acidithiobacillus strains and several other identified OmpR homologues (Figure 1B). OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. exhibit a close relationship between Acidithiobacillus species, but a far evolutionary relationship with the well-studied OmpRs in E. coli and S. typhimurium. By analysing the OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. and E. coli K12, OmpRs in acidophilic autotrophic Acidithiobacillus strains were found to carry the typical signal receiver (REC) and helix-turn-helix (HTH) domains responsible for receiving the phosphoryl group from their cognate EnvZs and binding to regulatory sequences, respectively (Figure 1C). The phosphorylation site (D) and dimerization interface (KPF) in the REC domain are also predicted to be present in the OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus (Figure 1C). The presence of a similar ompR-envZ operon structure, and the discovery of the typical domains and conserved amino acid residues among OmpRs indicated potential similar biological functions of the EnvZ-OmpR system in the acidophilic autotrophic Acidithiobacillus spp. and in E. coli.

3.2. Construction of the A. caldus ompR-Knockout Strain

The ompR gene in A. caldus MTH-04 was successfully deleted using the “in–out” markerless gene knockout strategy developed by our laboratory [35]. As shown in Figure 2A, the “in” step was achieved with the suicide plasmid pSDUDI-ΔompR containing two homologous arms located upstream and downstream of the ompR gene. The suicide plasmid integrates into the A. caldus genome via allelic exchange, resulting in the generation of a single crossover mutant. The “out” step was performed by introducing plasmid pSDU1-I-SceI expressing the I-SceI endonuclease. The enzyme produces a double-stranded break (DSB) at the I-SceI site in the genome of the single crossover mutant. The DSB stimulates a second allelic exchange, producing a mutant or a wild-type sequence. The ΔompR strain was confirmed by PCR using the different sets of primers (Figure 2B,C). No band was amplified from the ompR knockout strain when using primers ompR-F/R specific for the targeted gene ompR. A smaller fragment was obtained from the mutant using primers UHA-F/DHA-R specific for the homologous arms, and a 2.7 kb fragment was amplified from ΔompR compared to a 3.4 kb fragment from the wild-type using primers LHA-F/R specific for the lateral regions of the two homologous arms. Finally, the 2.7 kb PCR fragment amplified from ΔompR was sequenced for verification. The results indicated that the ΔompR strain carries a markerless in-frame ompR mutation with deletion of a 720 bp sequence from the start (ATG) to the stop (TGA) codes.

3.3. The Influence of Ion Concentration on the Growth of A. caldus and its ompR Mutant

To investigate the effect of osmotic stress on A. caldus cells, we examined the growth of ΔompR and wild-type strains in liquid starkey-S0 medium with different concentrations of inorganic ions. When sodium sulfate was used as the reagent for generating osmotic pressure, the mutant exhibited an obvious disadvantage in growth compared to that of the wild-type strain with an increase in the concentration. The ΔompR strain displayed a slightly weaker growth pattern compared to that of the wild-type strain at Na2SO4 concentration of 0 and 0.15 M (Figure 3A,B). When the concentration of Na2SO4 was increased to 0.30 M, the growth of the mutant was obviously suppressed compared to that of the wild-type strain (Figure 3C). ΔompR was unable to grow when the concentration of Na2SO4 reached 0.45 M (Figure 3D). Similar phenomena were observed when K2SO4 was used to test the sensitivity of the mutant to osmotic stress (Figure S1). Although the growth of ΔompR was suppressed by NaCl at concentrations of 0.15, 0.30 or 0.45 M, the mutant could grow at 0.45 M (Figure S1). Therefore, the poor growth of ΔompR in the presence of elevated concentrations of inorganic salts, indicated the critical role of OmpR in A. caldus adaptation to the osmotic stress caused by inorganic ions.

3.4. The Influence of OmpR Absence on the Transcriptome Profile of A. caldus under Osmotic Stress

Total RNA from the wild-type and mutant strains under an osmotic pressure of 0.3 M Na2SO4 was extracted to carry out RNA-seq for detecting DEGs. A total of 109 DEGs, including 75 down-regulated and 34 up-regulated DEGs in the OmpR knockout strain (see Supplementary Table S2), were selected using the criteria described in the Methods Section 2.3. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using the primers listed in supplementary Table S1 was performed on 35 of the 109 DEGs; fold changes were calculated (Table S2), and these fold change values based on RT-qPCR were compared to those of RNA-seq. The results indicated that among the 35 genes, data for 33 were within the 95% confidence interval (see Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting high consistency between the results generated by RNA-seq and RT-qPCR. Thus, the fold changes of genes determined by RNA-seq are reliable data.
The 109 DEGs are mainly involved in the metabolic processes of sulfur, nitrogen and carbon, membrane and channel proteins, conjugal transfer system and DNA modification system (Table S2 and Figure 4). Deletion of ompR resulted in up-regulation of tetH and tqo and down-regulation of soxY (F0726_02556), soxZ (F0726_02557), soxB (F0726_02558), soxA (F0726_02562) and sdo, indicating the influence of EnvZ-OmpR on sulfur oxidation in A. caldus. Many channels and membrane proteins showed obvious down-regulation in the ompR mutant, such as the TonB-dependent receptor (F0726_03003), ABC-type Mn2+/Zn2+ transport system (F0726_00324, 00325 and 00326) and RND efflux system(F0726_01023), suggesting regulation of membrane permeability by OmpR. Expression of flagellar synthesis genes (F0726_01512, 02316 and 02317) was down-regulated in the mutant, implying the influence of EnvZ-OmpR on cell motility in A. caldus adaptation to osmotic stress. In addition, the absence of OmpR resulted in down-regulation of the restriction-modification system, transposases, regulators and cyclic di-GMP metabolism-related proteins. The majority of DEGs are down-regulated in ΔompR, indicating that the mutant had to reduce metabolism, membrane permeability and cell motility to adapt to the osmotic pressure. Therefore, EnvZ-OmpR played a global regulatory role in the osmoregulation of A. caldus.

3.5. OmpR Binding Sequences in A. caldus

To discover OmpR binding sequences (OmpR boxes) in A. caldus, the 700 bp sequence upstream of the DEGs were used for scanning OmpR boxes using the matrix-scan program at http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/rsat, with a cutoff score value of 7. As shown in Table 3, OmpR consensus-like sequences were discovered upstream of 25 DEGs, including 10 up-regulated and 15 down-regulated genes. Furthermore, these predicted OmpR binding sequences in A. caldus MTH-04 were used to create the logo motif of OmpR boxes (Figure 5A). The OmpR-binding sequence motif from A. caldus displayed 71.4% and 65.0% similarity to that from E. coli and Salmonella enterica (S. enterica), respectively (Figure 5B). Overall, the discovery of OmpR binding sequences upstream of the DEGs and the high similarities of OmpR box motifs between A. caldus and other bacteria, indicate the conservation of OmpR during its evolution in these chemoautotrophic and acidophilic bacteria.

3.6. The Binding Ability of OmpR to the tetH Promoter Fragment

The two co-transcribed genes tetH (encoding tetrathionate hydrolase) and tqo (encoding thiosulfate: quinol oxidoreductase), combined with a two-component system (RsrR and RsrS), are arranged in a cluster in A. caldus [40]. Up-regulation of tetH and tqo in ΔompR and the predicted OmpR boxes at upstream of the tetH gene suggest a negative and direct regulation of tetH by OmpR (Table S2 and Table 3). To confirm this, assays, including isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), were performed to confirm binding between OmpR and the tetH promoter sequence. In the ITC analysis, no obvious differences in the integration effect were found between OmpR and the TE buffer (Figure 6A). An obvious reaction signal was detected using the E. coli ompC fragment containing the conserved OmpR box (Figure 6B), indicating that OmpR from A. caldus is able to bind to the OmpR box sequence. OmpR showed a significant integration effect with the tetH fragment but not the gapdH fragment from A. caldus (Figure 6C,D), showing the ability of OmpR to bind to the tetH promoter region. Furthermore, the binding ability was confirmed by EMSA. The expected gel shift of OmpRwith the tetH fragment and no shift of OmpRwith the gapdH fragment were observed (Figure 6E). The consistent results from ITC and EMSA indicated that OmpR is able to bind directly to the tetH promoter region to achieve negative regulation of tetrathionate metabolism of A. caldus (Figure 6F).

4. Discussion

Our study revealed that the EnvZ-OmpR system is an essential osmoregulation mechanism for Acidithiobacillus spp. to adapt to a high-salt environment. The discovery of EnvZ-OmpR homologues and the ompR-envZ operon in different species of Acidithiobacillus indicate the presence of the EnvZ-OmpR system in these chemoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (Figure 1A). While the OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus strains are distantly related to those from E. coli and S. typhimurium (Figure 1B), the typical domains and conserved amino acid residues of OmpRs in these acidophilic autotrophic bacteria are almost identical to that of E. coli. The significant inhibitory effect of high ion concentrations on the growth of ΔompR demonstrates the essential role of OmpR for A. caldus to adapt to high osmotic stress (Figure 3). Overall, the prevalence and conservation of EnvZ-OmpR in Acidithiobacillus spp. as well as the determination of the indispensable role of OmpR in the growth of A. caldus at high concentrations of inorganic salts suggest that EnvZ-OmpRs are also employed by these chemoautotrophic and acidophilic bacteria to cope with the osmotic stress induced by elevated salinity.
The regulation of membrane permeability by OmpR might be a strategy for A. caldus to achieve osmoregulation in a high-salt environment. Unlike OmpR-regulated osmoregulation in heterotrophic neutrophils [19,41], the homologues of the outer membrane porins OmpF and OmpC are absent in these autotrophic and acidophilic bacteria. Acidophiles can regulate the permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane to adapt to osmotic pressure [42,43]. The strong regulating effect of OmpR on membrane and channel proteins (Table S2) confirmed that A. caldus employs EnvZ-OmpR to modulate its membrane permeability according to the concentration of ions in the environment. Although chloride salts have a far greater inhibitory effect on Acidithiobacillus spp. than do sulfate salts [43], ΔompR showed a relatively good growth capacity in 0.45 M NaCl, in contrast to its failure to grow at the same concentration of sulfate salts (Figure S1 and Figure 3). This growth difference suggested that the type of salt has an obvious influence on the adaptation of the A. caldus ompR-knockout strain to osmotic stress. In many halophilic archaea, intracellular accumulation of chloride and potassium is an important mechanism for dealing with high osmotic pressure [44]. Thus, the better growth capability of ΔompR at high concentrations of NaCl indicate the presence of a similar osmoregulatory mechanism in A. caldus.
Regulation of sulfur oxidation by OmpR may help A. caldus adapt to osmotic stress. It has been reported that a high concentration of salt (200 mM) lowers the sulfur oxidation rate of A. thiooxidans [12]. Sulfur-metabolic processes in A. caldus include activation and oxidation of elemental sulfur in the outer membrane, thiosulfate-metabolic pathways in the periplasm, and sulfur-oxidizing enzymes in the cytoplasm. The two periplasmic thiosulfate-metabolic pathways, the tetrathionate intermediate thiosulfate oxidation (S4I) pathway and sulfur oxidizing enzyme (Sox) system, were both affected by the absence of OmpR under exposure to high salt (Table S2). The S4I pathway consists of a thiosulfate: quinol oxidoreductase (Tqo) and a tetrathionate hydrolase (TetH), which are responsible for oxidizing thiosulfate to tetrathionate and hydrolysing tetrathionate to thiosulfate and other products, respectively [40,45]. As thiosulfate is incompletely oxidized by the Sox system, this compound is considered a joint substrate for the S4I and Sox pathways. Tetrathionate in the periplasm is proposed to be transferred by DsrE/TusA into cytoplasm for further oxidation [46]; thus, the concentration of tetrathionate might affect periplasmic and cytoplasmic sulfur-oxidizing processes. Moreover, thiosulfate is unstable at pH < 4, whereas tetrathionate is acid stable [47]. Therefore, S4I pathway-mediated conversion between S2O32− and S4O62−, not only influences periplasmic and cytoplasmic sulfur-metabolizing pathways, but also the concentration and species of sulfur substrates in acidic environments. The direct and negative regulation of OmpR on the S4I pathway was discovered based on the up-regulation of tetH and tqo in ΔompR and the binding ability of OmpR to the tetH promoter region (Table S2 and Figure 6). This discovery suggests that A. caldus invokes EnvZ-OmpR to control the expression of the S4I pathway directly, further influencing the expression of other sulfur-oxidizing enzymes and the sulfur-metabolic processes. Thus, the EnvZ-OmpR-mediated regulation of sulfur metabolism might be an adaptation of A. caldus to osmotic pressure.
A co-regulation mode of the S4I pathway mediated by EnvZ-OmpR and RsrS-RsrR was discovered in A. caldus. A previous study revealed that RsrS-RsrR positively regulates the S4I pathway via the binding of RsrR to a 19 bp inverted repeat sequence (IRS) in the tetH promoter region [35]. In this study, the direct and negative regulation of the S4I pathway by EnvZ-OmpR was revealed for the first time. While RsrS-RsrR is considered an EnvZ-OmpR like two-component system [35,40], the binding sites for the RsrR and OmpR are not identical and show significant distinction in base composition (Figure 6F). Thus, it is speculated that RsrR and OmpR bind to IRS and OmpR boxes to achieve positive and negative regulation of the S4I pathway, respectively. Thus, a model for the co-regulation mode for the tetrathionate-metabolic pathway mediated by EnvZ-OmpR and RsrS-RsrR, is proposed to illustrate the significance of this regulation to the osmotic and acidic adaptations of A. caldus (Figure 7). Under favorable conditions, A. caldus modulates the expression of sulfur-oxidizing gene via positive regulation of the S4I pathway by RsrS-RsrR. As sulfur substrates are oxidized and the ion concentration increases in the solution, the environmental stresses of osmolality and acidity emerges, and A. caldus readjusts the expression of sulfur-oxidizing genes via RsrS-RsrR-mediated negative regulation of the S4I pathway.
In summary, we demonstrated that EnvZ-OmpR is a fundamental system for A. caldus to adapt to high osmotic pressure. OmpR functions as a global regulator to endow A. caldus with adaption in environments of high salinity. The discovery of direct and negative regulation of the S4I pathway by EnvZ-OmpR reveals the novel regulatory function of EnvZ-OmpR in sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and the significance of sulfur-metabolic regulation in the ability of A. caldus to cope with osmotic stress. The discovery of the co-regulation mode for S4I pathway mediated EnvZ-OmpR and RsrS/RsrR in A. caldus provides new insights into the sulfur-metabolic regulation and environmental adaptation mechanism in these chemoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11010035/s1, Figure S1: Growth analysis of ΔompR and wild-type strains of A. caldus at different concentrations of NaCl or K2SO4 in S0 medium; Figure S2: Bland-Altman plot of differences against averages of fold changes for RNA-seq and RT-qPCR, with 95% confidence limit (the upper and lower solid lines); Table S1: Primers used for RT-qPCR; Table S2: Differentially expressed genes detected by RNA-seq and RT-qPCR.

Author Contributions

Methodology, X.L. (Xiao Liu) and Y.G.; Validation, J.L. and X.L. (Xiangmei Li); Formal analysis, C.G.; Investigation, L.C. and X.P.; Writing—original draft, L.C.; Writing—review & editing, L.C.; Supervision, X.P.; Funding acquisition, X.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30800011, 31400093, 31570036, 31370138, 31570041, 31872621, 32070057), and the State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology Foundation (M2017-01), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020MC006), People’s Republic of China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence of A. caldus MTH-04 was deposited in NCBI with GenBank: CP043926.1. The nucleotide sequences of rsrR and rsrS have been deposited with GenBank accession numbers KX161704 and KX161705, respectively. The raw data of RNA-seq is deposited in NCBI with accession number SRA1121784.

Acknowledgments

We thank Zhao-Bao Wang (Shandong University) for assistance in constructing gene mutants, Xian-Ke Chen (Shandong University) for assistance in testing the growth of gene mutants, and Chun-Long Yang and Xue-Yan Gao (Shandong University) for the help in the data analysis. We also thank the Core Facilities Sharing Platform for Life and Environment Sciences of Shandong University, including Cheng-Jia Zhang and Nan-Nan Dong for providing the bacteriological incubator, Zhi-Feng Li for RT-qPCR instruction, and Jing Zhu for assistance in ITC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nunez, H.; Moya-Beltran, A.; Covarrubias, P.C.; Issotta, F.; Cardenas, J.P.; Gonzalez, M.; Atavales, J.; Acuna, L.G.; Johnson, D.B.; Quatrini, R. Molecular Systematics of the genus Acidithiobacillus: Insights into the phylogenetic structure and diversification of the taxon. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, R.; Lin, J.; Liu, X.; Pang, X.; Zhang, C.; Yang, C.; Gao, X.; Lin, C.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Sulfur Oxidation in the acidophilic autotrophic Acidithiobacillus spp. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rawlings, D.E. Characteristics and adaptability of iron- and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms used for the recovery of metals from minerals and their concentrates. Microb. Cell Factories 2005, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Temple, K.L.; Colmer, A.R. The autotrophic oxidation of iron by a new bacterium, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J. Bacteriol. 1951, 62, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hedrich, S.; Johnson, D.B. Acidithiobacillus ferridurans sp. nov., an acidophilic iron-, sulfur- and hydrogen-metabolizing chemolithotrophic gammaproteobacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 4018–4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Falagan, C.; Johnson, D.B. Acidithiobacillus ferriphilus sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic iron- and sulfur-metabolizing extreme acidophile. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 206–211. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hallberg, K.B.; Lindström, E.B. Characterization of Thiobacillus caldus sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic acidophile. Microbiology 1994, 140, 3451. [Google Scholar]
  8. Valdés, J.; Pedroso, I.; Quatrini, R.; Dodson, R.J.; Tettelin, H.; Eisen, J.A.; Holmes, D.S. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans metabolism: From genome sequence to industrial applications. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Liu, S.; Yu, Y.; Lin, J.; Lin, J.; Pang, X.; Zhao, J. Development of a markerless gene replacement system for Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and construction of a pfkB mutant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1826–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wen, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Lin, J. A versatile and efficient markerless gene disruption system for Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans: Application for characterizing a copper tolerance related multicopper oxidase gene. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 3499–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robbins, E.I.; Rodgers, T.M.; Alpers, C.N.; Nordstrom, D.K. Ecogeochemistry of the subsurface food web at pH 0–2.5 in Iron Mountain, California, USA. Hydrobiologia 2000, 433, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  12. Suzuki, I.; Lee, D.; Mackay, B.; Harahuc, L.; Oh, J.K. Effect of various ions, pH, and osmotic pressure on oxidation of elemental sulfur by Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 5163–5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shiers, D.W.; Blight, K.R.; Ralph, D.E. Sodium sulphate and sodium chloride effects on batch culture of iron oxidising bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 2005, 80, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gahan, C.S.; Sundkvist, J.E.; Dopson, M.; Sandstrom, A. Effect of chloride on ferrous iron oxidation by a Leptospirillum ferriphilum-dominated chemostat culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 106, 422–431. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zammit, C.M.; Mangold, S.; Jonna, V.; Mutch, L.A.; Watling, H.R.; Dopson, M.; Watkin, E. Bioleaching in brackish waters-effect of chloride ions on the acidophile population and proteomes of model species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Blight, K.; Ralph, D. Effect of ionic strength on iron oxidation with batch cultures of chemolithotrophic bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 2004, 73, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Boxall, N.J.; Rea, S.M.; Li, J.; Morris, C.; Kaksonen, A.H. Effect of high sulfate concentrations on chalcopyrite bioleaching and molecular characterisation of the bioleaching microbial community. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 168, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, X.; Jiang, C.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, M.; Poetsch, A.; Liu, S. Proteomic and molecular investigations revealed that Acidithiobacillus caldus adopts multiple strategies for adaptation to NaCl stress. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cai, S.J.; Inouye, M. EnvZ-OmpR interaction and osmoregulation in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 24155–24161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nieckarz, M.; Raczkowska, A.; Dębski, J.; Kistowski, M.; Dadlez, M.; Heesemann, J.; Rossier, O.; Brzostek, K. Impact of OmpR on the membrane proteome of Yersinia enterocolitica in different environments: Repression of major adhesin YadA and heme receptor HemR. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 997–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roberts, D.L.; Bennett, D.W.; Forst, S.A. Identification of the site of phosphorylation on the osmosensor, EnvZ, of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 8728–8733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Forst, S.; Delgado, J.; Ramakrishnan, G.; Inouye, M. Regulation of ompC and ompF expression in Escherichia coli in the absence of envZ. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 5080–5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yoshida, T.; Qin, L.; Egger, L.A.; Inouye, M. Transcription regulation of ompF and ompC by a single transcription factor, OmpR. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 17114–17123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Forst, S.; Delgado, J.; Inouye, M. Phosphorylation of OmpR by the osmosensor EnvZ modulates expression of the ompF and ompC genes in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6052–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kenney, L.J.; Bauer, M.D.; Silhavy, T.J. Phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes in OmpR, an osmoregulatory DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 8866–8870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Huang, K.J.; Lan, C.Y.; Igo, M.M. Phosphorylation stimulates the cooperative DNA-binding properties of the transcription factor OmpR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 2828–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chatfield, S.N.; Dorman, C.J.; Hayward, C.; Dougan, G. Role of ompR-dependent genes in Salmonella typhimurium virulence: Mutants deficient in both ompC and ompF are attenuated in vivo. Infect. Immun. 1991, 59, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shin, S.; Park, C. Modulation of flagellar expression in Escherichia coli by acetyl phosphate and the osmoregulator OmpR. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4696–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bang, I.S.; Kim, B.H.; Foster, J.W.; Park, Y.K. OmpR regulates the stationary-phase acid tolerance response of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2245–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Guillier, M.; Gottesman, S. Remodelling of the Escherichia coli outer membrane by two small regulatory RNAs. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Valdés, J.; Pedroso, I.; Quatrini, R.; Holmes, D.S. Comparative genome analysis of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans and A. caldus: Insights into their metabolism and ecophysiology. Hydrometallurgy 2008, 94, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. You, X.Y.; Guo, X.; Zheng, H.J.; Zhang, M.J.; Liu, L.J.; Zhu, Y.Q.; Liu, S.J. Unraveling the Acidithiobacillus caldus complete genome and its central metabolisms for carbon assimilation. J. Genet. Genom. 2011, 38, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Valdes, J.; Ossandon, F.; Quatrini, R.; Dopson, M.; Holmes, D.S. Draft genome sequence of the extremely acidophilic biomining bacterium Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans ATCC 19377 provides insights into the evolution of the Acidithiobacillus genus. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 7003–7004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jin, S.M.; Yan, W.M.; Wang, Z.N. Transfer of IncP plasmids to extremely acidophilic Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 429–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Lin, J.; Pang, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, B.; Wang, R.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Lin, J.; et al. The two-component system RsrS-RsrR regulates the tetrathionate intermediate pathway for thiosulfate oxidation in Acidithiobacillus caldus. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, Y.; Qi, F.; Lin, J.; Tian, K.; Yan, W. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of a moderately thermophilic acidophilic sulfur oxidizing bacterium. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2004, 44, 382–385. [Google Scholar]
  37. Simon, R.; Priefer, U.; Pühler, A. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: Transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Nat. Biotechnol. 1983, 1, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, X.; Lin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Bian, J.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yan, W. Construction of conjugative gene transfer system between E. coli and moderately thermophilic, extremely acidophilic Acidithiobacillus caldus MTH-04. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 17, 162–167. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, R.; Lin, J.; Liu, X.; Pang, X.; Zhang, C.; Lin, J.; Chen, L. Essential role of sigma factor RpoF in flagellar biosynthesis and flagella-mediated motility of Acidithiobacillus caldus. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rzhepishevska, O.I.; Valdés, J.; Marcinkeviciene, L.; Gallardo, C.A.; Meskys, R.; Bonnefoy, V.; Holmes, D.S.; Dopson, M. Regulation of a novel Acidithiobacillus caldus gene cluster involved in metabolism of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7367–7372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yoshida, T.; Cai, S.; Inouye, M. Interaction of EnvZ, a sensory histidine kinase, with phosphorylated OmpR, the cognate response regulator. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Macalady, J.L.; Vestling, M.M.; Baumler, D.; Boekelheide, N.; Kaspar, C.W.; Banfield, J.F. Tetraether-linked membrane monolayers in Ferroplasma spp.: A key to survival in acid. Extremophiles 2004, 8, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zammit, C.M.; Watkin, E.L. Adaptation to extreme acidity and osmotic stress. In Acidophiles: Life in Extremely Acidic Environments; Quatrini, R., Johnson, D.B., Eds.; Caister Academic Press: Poole, UK, 2016; pp. 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  44. Empadinhas, N.; da Costa, M.S. Osmoadaptation mechanisms in prokaryotes: Distribution of compatible solutes. Int. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, L.; Ren, Y.; Lin, J.; Liu, X.; Pang, X.; Lin, J. Acidithiobacillus caldus sulfur oxidation model based on transcriptome analysis between the wild type and sulfur oxygenase reductase defective mutant. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, L.; Stockdreher, Y.; Koch, T.; Sun, S.T.; Fan, Z.; Josten, M.; Sahl, H.; Wang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Liu, S.; et al. Thiosulfate transfer mediated by DsrE/TusA homologs from acidothermophilic sulfur-oxidizing archaeon Metallosphaera cuprina. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 26949–26959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Johnston, F.; Mcamish, L. A study of the rates of sulfur production in acid thiosulfate solutions using S-35. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1973, 42, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 00035 g001 550
Figure 1. Bioinformatic analysis of OmpRs. (A) The ompR-envZ operons from Acidithiobacillus spp. The percent identities between protein sequences are indicated by values shown in the genes. Abbreviations: OmpR: osmolarity response regulator; EnvZ: osmolarity sensor protein. Accession numbers (GenBank) for these proteins: A. caldus MTH-04, OmpR (F0726_02628), EnvZ (F0726_02627); A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270, OmpR (ACK79405.1), EnvZ (ACK79033.1); A. ferrivorans SS3, OmpR (WP_014027719.1), EnvZ (WP_014027720.1); A. thiooxidans, OmpR (WP_010642464.1), EnvZ (WP_031575473.1). (B) A phylogenetic tree of several OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. and other bacteria. CLUSTALX (version 1.81) and MEGA 4.0 with bootstrapping (1000 replicates) were used for phylogenetic tree construction. The protein id or locus_tag of each OmpR is present in parentheses. (C) Amino acid sequence alignment of OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. and E. coli K12. Identical and similar amino acids are indicated. The typical REC and HTH domains are characterized and marked in the sequence. The predicted phosphorylation site (D) and dimerization interface (KPF) are shown in boxes.
Figure 1. Bioinformatic analysis of OmpRs. (A) The ompR-envZ operons from Acidithiobacillus spp. The percent identities between protein sequences are indicated by values shown in the genes. Abbreviations: OmpR: osmolarity response regulator; EnvZ: osmolarity sensor protein. Accession numbers (GenBank) for these proteins: A. caldus MTH-04, OmpR (F0726_02628), EnvZ (F0726_02627); A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270, OmpR (ACK79405.1), EnvZ (ACK79033.1); A. ferrivorans SS3, OmpR (WP_014027719.1), EnvZ (WP_014027720.1); A. thiooxidans, OmpR (WP_010642464.1), EnvZ (WP_031575473.1). (B) A phylogenetic tree of several OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. and other bacteria. CLUSTALX (version 1.81) and MEGA 4.0 with bootstrapping (1000 replicates) were used for phylogenetic tree construction. The protein id or locus_tag of each OmpR is present in parentheses. (C) Amino acid sequence alignment of OmpRs from Acidithiobacillus spp. and E. coli K12. Identical and similar amino acids are indicated. The typical REC and HTH domains are characterized and marked in the sequence. The predicted phosphorylation site (D) and dimerization interface (KPF) are shown in boxes.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g001
Microorganisms 11 00035 g002 550
Figure 2. The construction process of the A. caldus ompR knockout strain. (A) The markerless gene knockout strategy in A. caldus. (B) Diagram of three sets of primers (ompR-F/R, IHA-F/R and LHA-F/R) specific for ompR, the upstream and downstream homologous arms (UHA and DHA) and the sequences outside of homologous arms, respectively. (C) PCR amplification of the genomic DNA of wild-type (W) and mutant (Δ) A. caldus MTH-04 using primers ompR-F/R, IHA-F/R and LHA-F/R.
Figure 2. The construction process of the A. caldus ompR knockout strain. (A) The markerless gene knockout strategy in A. caldus. (B) Diagram of three sets of primers (ompR-F/R, IHA-F/R and LHA-F/R) specific for ompR, the upstream and downstream homologous arms (UHA and DHA) and the sequences outside of homologous arms, respectively. (C) PCR amplification of the genomic DNA of wild-type (W) and mutant (Δ) A. caldus MTH-04 using primers ompR-F/R, IHA-F/R and LHA-F/R.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g002
Microorganisms 11 00035 g003 550
Figure 3. Growth curves of ΔompR and wild-type strains of A. caldus MTH-04 at different concentrations of sodium sulfate in S0 medium (OD600, optical density at 600 nm). The two numbers (×× M, ××× KPa) stand for the concentration of added salts and the generated osmotic pressure by these added compounds, respectively. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean value of the three parallel experimental groups. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
Figure 3. Growth curves of ΔompR and wild-type strains of A. caldus MTH-04 at different concentrations of sodium sulfate in S0 medium (OD600, optical density at 600 nm). The two numbers (×× M, ××× KPa) stand for the concentration of added salts and the generated osmotic pressure by these added compounds, respectively. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean value of the three parallel experimental groups. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g003
Microorganisms 11 00035 g004 550
Figure 4. Scatter plot of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in ΔompR compared to wild-type A. caldus MTH-04. Gene number: number of DEGs mapped to a certain pathway. Enrichment factor: The ratio of the number of DEGs mapped to a certain pathway to the total number of genes mapped to this pathway. The Q-value is the corrected p-value ranging from 0–1 and a lower value indicates greater intensiveness.
Figure 4. Scatter plot of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in ΔompR compared to wild-type A. caldus MTH-04. Gene number: number of DEGs mapped to a certain pathway. Enrichment factor: The ratio of the number of DEGs mapped to a certain pathway to the total number of genes mapped to this pathway. The Q-value is the corrected p-value ranging from 0–1 and a lower value indicates greater intensiveness.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g004
Microorganisms 11 00035 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of the OmpR box motif from A. caldus. (A) The motif of A. caldus; (B) alignment of OmpR binding motifs.
Figure 5. Analysis of the OmpR box motif from A. caldus. (A) The motif of A. caldus; (B) alignment of OmpR binding motifs.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g005
Microorganisms 11 00035 g006 550
Figure 6. The binding affinity of OmpR to the tetH promoter region. (A–D) are the results of ITC experiments titrating A. caldus OmpR with the TE buffer, ompC fragment, tetH fragmentand gapdH fragment, respectively. (E) The results of EMSA to display the binding of OmpR to the tetH promoter region. (F) Schematic diagram of the regulatory elements in the tetH promoter region. G360, a 360 bp fragment from the gapdH gene used as a control; T360, amplified 360 bp fragment upstream of the tetH gene.
Figure 6. The binding affinity of OmpR to the tetH promoter region. (A–D) are the results of ITC experiments titrating A. caldus OmpR with the TE buffer, ompC fragment, tetH fragmentand gapdH fragment, respectively. (E) The results of EMSA to display the binding of OmpR to the tetH promoter region. (F) Schematic diagram of the regulatory elements in the tetH promoter region. G360, a 360 bp fragment from the gapdH gene used as a control; T360, amplified 360 bp fragment upstream of the tetH gene.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g006
Microorganisms 11 00035 g007 550
Figure 7. The co-regulation mode for the S4I pathway by RsrS-RsrR and EnvZ-OmpR in A. caldus.
Figure 7. The co-regulation mode for the S4I pathway by RsrS-RsrR and EnvZ-OmpR in A. caldus.
Microorganisms 11 00035 g007
Table
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in the study.
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in the study.
Strains or PlasmidsGenotype or DescriptionSource or Reference
Strains
A. caldus
MTH-04Isolated from Tengchong area, Yunnan province, China[36]
ΔompRΔompRThis study
E. coli
DH5αF−Φ80d lacZΔM15Δ(lacZYA-argF) U169 end A1 recA1 hsdR17(rk−,mk+) supE44λ-thi-1 gyr96 relA1 phoATransGen Biotech Corp., Beijing, China
SM10Thr leu hsd recA KmrRP4-2-Tc::Mu[37]
BL21 (DE3)F−ompT hdsSB(Rb−mB−) gal dgmmet(DE3)TransGen Biotech Corp., Beijing, China
Plasmids
pSDUDIsuicide plasmid; Apr; Kmr; oriTRP4; multi-cloning sites [35]
pSDUDI::ompR(UHA + DHA)suicide plasmid for ompR deletionThis study
pSDU1-I-SceICmr; mob+; Ptac; containing I-SceI gene [35]
pET-28aAmprNovagen Cor.
pET-28a-ompRAmpr, ompRThis study
Table
Table 2. Primers used in construction of A. caldus ompR mutant, OmpR-expressing plasmid, and assays of protein-DNA interactions.
Table 2. Primers used in construction of A. caldus ompR mutant, OmpR-expressing plasmid, and assays of protein-DNA interactions.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence (5′→3′)
P1-FACGCGTCGACATGGGCAAGATGGCAGGACAACG
P1-RCGGGATCCGATGCGCCCGCGTTTCTGGACGGAC
P2-FCGGGATCCTCAGGGGCGCTTCCAACCCGGATGA
P2-RCCCAAGCTTCGGCCTGAATACTCTGGTTCTGGGTG
oriT-FTACTAGACTAGTGCTCGTCCTGCTTCTCTTCG
oriT-RACCGGAATTCCGGGATTCAACCCACTCG
LHA-FCAAGATGGCAGGACAACGC
LHA-RGGCGGAGGTGTTCATGGTTA
IHA-FGGTGCGGGAAGTTTAGGGC
IHA-RCAAAGGAGAATGCAATGAAAATGTT
ompR-FGCAGGATTTCAGCGTCTGTG
ompR-RGACAGGGTCTGCCAGGGAT
ompR02628-FCGCGGATCCATGGCCAAGGCCCGCATC
ompR02628-RCCCAAGCTTTCAGGTGGCCGTGGAGCC
G360-FCGCAATATTCTGCGGGCGGTC
G360-RTACGGTAAGGTCCACCGGAT
T360-FAGCGCCGATTGTGTACAGAATGAAC
T360-RGATATATAATCTCCGAATCGCTAAT
Restriction sites were indicated with underlines.
Table
Table 3. Analysis on the potential OmpR boxes upstream of the DEGs.
Table 3. Analysis on the potential OmpR boxes upstream of the DEGs.
Gene ID (F0726_)GeneAnnotationRegulationRNA-SeqRT-qPCRComputational Marching of the OmpR Consensus
PositionSequenceScore
1027tetHtetrathionate hydrolase-2.263.78R-122…-103TTTAGCTTATGTAACAAGTT13.1
D-127…-108GTTACAACTTGTTACATAAG12.8
R-132…-113GTAACAAGTTGTAACAGGTG8.6
48dsbDthiol:disulfide interchange protein-16.2524.92R-128…-109CCTAACTCAAGAAACATTTT7.8
1023nodTRND efflux system, outer membrane lipoprotein, NodT family-3.452.96D-405…-386TTTACGATTTGTTACAAAAA11.9
R-410…-391GTAACAAATCGTAAAATATG10.7
R-419…-400CGTAAAATATGTAACATCCT9.4
D-374…-355TTGACAGATTGTTACACAAC8.3
D-424…-405CTACCAGGATGTTACATATT7
2394 DEAD/DEAH box helicase domain protein-4.355.06R-23…-4GTTACCGTTGTTTATATTTT8.4
D-107…-88ATAAGTTCTGGAAATAAATA7.2
3003 TonB-dependent receptor +0.290.12R-54…-35TGTAAGTTTGAATGCAATTT7.7
D-387…-368GTCTAATATTGAAGTATCTC7.2
2726mscSmechanosensitive ion channel +0.640.61R-54…-35TTTTAGTCTAGAAACATCGT10.5
1798 membrane protein+0.090.07R-341…-322TAAAAAGCGAGAAACATCAT7.5
1192 translation initiation factor IF-2+0.560.41D-104…-85ATAAAAAAATATAACAAGAA8.8
R-116…-97TTTTTTATATAAAACAATTA8.6
D-121…-102CTATATAATTGTTTTATATA8.4
2316motAflagellar motor protein+0.280.32R-202…-183TTCACAAATAGTTGCACCAA7.5
R-404…-385CTAAAAAATCGGAACAACTG7.1
2322adeadenine deaminase+0.320.37D-395…-376GTCACAGCATGTTACATGTA10.2
R-381…-362AAAAATCTTTGTAGTACATG8.9
1900 transposase, IS4+0.590.52R-407…-388ATTTGTCTTTGATACTAATT10.1
R-466…-447ATTAATATTGGTTTTATAAG8.4
D-492…-473TAAATATATAGAGATAAATT7.9
D-412…-393TCTACAATTAGTATCAAAGA7.9
R-598…-579AATACAATAACTAGTATTGT7.7
R-504…-485TATATTTATTATTCTATCTT7.7
1551 ISPsy4, transposition helper protein+0.010.02D-73…-54AAAACTTTAACATACCTTTT10.3
R-377…-358ATAACACTTTATATCCATTC8.4
2814xerCIntegrase +00.01R-470…-451GTAACTATTTGATTCTTAGA8.5
D-155…-136GAATATTAAGGAAATAGTTT7.6
D-465…-446GAATCAAATAGTTACTGTTC7.6
1869 transposase-3.544.21D-267…-248AATAAATTTTATGTCATTGC7.6
D-576…-557GATTATGTTCGAATCTTATG7.2
426 diguanylate cyclase+0.30.26D-181…-162GGAGATCTTTGATACCTTTA7
2335ahpDalkylhydroperoxidase like protein+00D-493…-474AAAAAATATTGAAAAATCTC11
222 AmmeMemoRadiSam system protein B-17.1118.38R-328…-309ATTTCATTTAGATGCTTTTG9.9
R-453…-434TTTAAGCTTCGTAATAAAGG7.7
D-526…-507AATAGACTCCGTAACAAAAT7.5
2436 type II DNA modification enzyme-1.821.41D-671…-652TGTACACTTTGATGTACATA7.4
2272 hypothetical protein+00R-31…-12TTTATTTTTTATTAGATATA9.5
2500 hypothetical protein-2.562.55R-109…-90AATACAGATAGTTAGGATTT7.6
D-309…-290TTTACATTCATATACATCAT7.2
650 hypothetical protein+0.630.6D-57…-38TAAAGACATCGATACAAAAG8.6
1813 hypothetical protein-2.373.53R-628…-609AGAAATGATGGTTGCAATGT8.4
1814 hypothetical protein-7.319.11R-236…-217AGAAATGATGGTTGCAATGT8.4
2504 hypothetical protein+0.410.33R-35…-16ATAAATATTAGAAATATTTC12
D-36…-17CGAAATATTTCTAATATTTA7.8
1734 hypothetical protein +0.070.18D-490…-471TTTAAATAATGAACCAATGA8.1
Fold Change ≥ 1.5, p-value ≤ 0.05: up-regulation; Fold Change ≤ 0.67, p-value ≤ 0.05: down-regulation. The numbers indicate the nucleotide positions upstream of the transcription start sites; -: negative and direct regulation; +: positive and direct regulation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, L.; Liu, X.; Gao, C.; Guan, Y.; Lin, J.; Liu, X.; Pang, X. The Essential Role of OmpR in Acidithiobacillus caldus Adapting to the High Osmolarity and Its Regulation on the Tetrathionate-Metabolic Pathway. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010035

AMA Style

Chen L, Liu X, Gao C, Guan Y, Lin J, Liu X, Pang X. The Essential Role of OmpR in Acidithiobacillus caldus Adapting to the High Osmolarity and Its Regulation on the Tetrathionate-Metabolic Pathway. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Linxu, Xiao Liu, Chang Gao, Yanan Guan, Jianqiang Lin, Xiangmei Liu, and Xin Pang. 2023. "The Essential Role of OmpR in Acidithiobacillus caldus Adapting to the High Osmolarity and Its Regulation on the Tetrathionate-Metabolic Pathway" Microorganisms 11, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010035

APA Style

Chen, L., Liu, X., Gao, C., Guan, Y., Lin, J., Liu, X., & Pang, X. (2023). The Essential Role of OmpR in Acidithiobacillus caldus Adapting to the High Osmolarity and Its Regulation on the Tetrathionate-Metabolic Pathway. Microorganisms, 11(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop