Next Article in Journal
Breakthrough Infections: A Challenge towards Measles Elimination?
Previous Article in Journal
Nationwide Seroprevalence Survey of Angiostrongylus vasorum-Derived Antigens and Specific Antibodies in Dogs from Colombia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Primary Site of Coxsackievirus B Replication in the Small Intestines: No Proof of Peyer’s Patches Involvement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Coxsackievirus Infection and Associated Diseases

by
Magloire Pandoua Nekoua
and
Didier Hober
*
Laboratoire de Virologie ULR3610, Université Lille et CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1566; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081566
Submission received: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coxsackievirus Infection and Associated Diseases)
Coxsackieviruses (CV) are ubiquitous and widespread single-stranded RNA viruses belonging to the Picornaviridae family and the genus Enterovirus, which also includes poliovirus (PV), the best known of the enteroviruses (EV). They are mainly transmitted by the fecal–oral route and are a major cause of viral infection each year worldwide, especially in children. They were first isolated in the late 1940s from the feces of paralyzed children living in Coxsackie (New York, USA) and were later classified into CV groups A (CVA) and B (CVB) based on the nature of their pathogenicity in mice. CV infections are considered to be asymptomatic or to induce subclinical or mild symptoms; nevertheless, they are also associated with various acute and chronic pathologies. For example, outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease are mainly caused by enterovirus A71 and CVA, whereas CVB are often associated with the pathogenesis of chronic myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy, and autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes (T1D). The knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of CV pathogenesis in human disease has progressed considerably in recent years, although questions still remain. This Special Issue presents the latest findings on CV virulence, mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of CV-associated diseases, and therapeutic strategies to combat CV infections.
EV, including CV, initially replicate in the gastrointestinal tract or in the upper respiratory tract before spreading to various target organs (heart, pancreas, thymus, etc.) through the lymphatic and blood systems. It has long been thought that the primary replication of all EV takes place in Peyer’s patches (PPs) (a group of lymphoid follicles of the lymphatic system located in the small intestine) according to the results of the PV studies on chimpanzees [1], but it is still unclear where exactly CV replicate in the intestine since the results of PV studies are often applied to other EV. In this line, Bopegamage et al. showed that viral RNA and VP1 protein were detected in the follicle-associated epithelium and the intestinal villi of orally infected outbred mice with CVB4 JVB, and CVB3 Nancy. However, CVB markers (viral RNA, VP1, and eGFP) were absent in the germinating centers (GCs) of the PPs, although IFN-α production was detected in these GCs of PPs and in the mucosal layer of the small intestines from infected mice [2]. The persistence of EV in the intestinal mucosa has been associated with the development of islet autoimmunity and T1D [3]. CVB persistence and dissemination to target organs is due to a successful evasion from the mucosal immune system of the gastrointestinal tract. Stone et al. showed that CVB3 could evade the immune response at the primary site of infection by preventing type I and III IFN production in human intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) through alteration of the expression of the signaling proteins MAVS (mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein) and TRIF (TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon-β) and eIF4G (eukaryotic initiation factor 4G), which is a key factor in the protein translation [4].
It has been suggested that the onset of islet autoimmunity and T1D results from impaired central tolerance to β-cell antigens following CVB infection of the thymus, particularly during fetal and neonatal life. Indeed, CVB4 can infect and persist in the thymus of humans and mice, especially in thymic epithelial cells (TECs), resulting in the alteration of Igf2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) expression (a major self-peptide of the insulin family found in the thymus) and disruption of negative selection of autoreactive T cells [5]. Furthermore, in utero infection with CVB4 induces a decrease in the level of Igf2 and Myo7 (myosin 7, an autoantigen of heart) mRNAs and proteins in mouse thymus and a decrease in transcription factors involved in thymic-negative selection such as Aire (autoimmune regulator) and Fezf2 (forebrain expressed zinc finger 2) in enriched mouse TECs [6]. It is well known that lifestyle and risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension play a major role in chronic kidney disease outcomes, but the involvement of CV infections in kidney injury has also been suggested in a NOD mouse model infected with CVB4 [7].
Various preventive and therapeutic strategies to combat EV infection, especially CVB, have been reported. Antiviral drugs against CVB targeting viral or host proteins and formalin-inactivated or virus-like particles vaccines have been developed [3]. Interferon immunotherapy could be an alternative strategy since type I IFNs have been shown to confer strong protection against CVB replication. In this regard, Stone et al. demonstrated that type I (IFN-α) and type III IFNs (IFN-λ1, IFN-λ2) treatment can induce upregulation of several interferon-stimulated genes and can significantly reduce CVB3 replication in IECs and thus could be beneficial in the prevention of acute or persistent CVB infection in the gastrointestinal tract [4]. A vaccine derived from an attenuated strain of CVB3 with a mutation in the coxsackievirus–adenovirus receptor-interacting region (Mt10 vaccine) has been shown to induce cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies against CVB1, CVB3, and CVB4 and to protect against wild-type CVB3-induced myocarditis and pancreatitis in A/J mice [8].
In summary, the complex virus–host interactions have been addressed in original articles and reviews published in the Special Issue “Coxsackievirus Infection and Associated Diseases”, and it provides readers with a better understanding of some aspects of this topic. Further investigation could benefit the research of innovative therapeutic strategies to combat CV infections and associated diseases.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bodian, D. Emerging concept of poliomyelitis infection. Science 1955, 122, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bopegamage, S.; Berakova, K.; Gomocak, P.; Baksova, R.; Galama, J.; Hyoty, H.; Tauriainen, S. Primary site of coxsackievirus B replication in the small intestines: No proof of peyer’s patches involvement. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nekoua, M.P.; Alidjinou, E.K.; Hober, D. Persistent coxsackievirus B infection and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022, 18, 503–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stone, V.M.; Ringqvist, E.E.; Larsson, P.G.; Domsgen, E.; Holmlund, U.; Sverremark-Ekström, E.; Flodström-Tullberg, M. Inhibition of type III interferon expression in intestinal epithelial cells—A strategy used by coxsackie B virus to evade the host’s innate immune response at the primary site of infection? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alhazmi, A.; Nekoua, M.P.; Michaux, H.; Sane, F.; Halouani, A.; Engelmann, I.; Alidjinou, E.K.; Martens, H.; Jaidane, H.; Geenen, V.; et al. Effect of coxsackievirus B4 infection on the thymus: Elucidating its role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Halouani, A.; Michaux, H.; Jmii, H.; Trussart, C.; Chahbi, A.; Martens, H.; Renard, C.; Aouni, M.; Hober, D.; Geenen, V.; et al. Coxsackievirus B4 transplacental infection severely disturbs central tolerogenic mechanisms in the fetal thymus. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walter, D.L.; Thuma, J.R.; Malgor, R.; Schwartz, F.L.; McCall, K.D.; Coschigano, K.T. Consequences of both coxsackievirus B4 and type 1 diabetes on female non-obese diabetic mouse kidneys. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lasrado, N.; Arumugam, R.; Rasquinha, M.T.; Sur, M.; Steffen, D.; Reddy, J. Mt10-CVB3 vaccine virus protects against CVB4 infection by inducing cross-reactive, antigen-specific immune responses. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nekoua, M.P.; Hober, D. Coxsackievirus Infection and Associated Diseases. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081566

AMA Style

Nekoua MP, Hober D. Coxsackievirus Infection and Associated Diseases. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nekoua, Magloire Pandoua, and Didier Hober. 2022. "Coxsackievirus Infection and Associated Diseases" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop