Next Article in Journal
Identification of a New Endo-β-1,4-xylanase Prospected from the Microbiota of the Termite Heterotermes tenuis
Next Article in Special Issue
Aerobic Degradation Characteristics of Decabromodiphenyl ether through Rhodococcus ruber TAW-CT127 and Its Preliminary Genome Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of a Novel Apilactobacillus Species from Giant Honeybee (Apis dorsata) Gut Reveals Occurrence of Genetic Elements Coding Prebiotic and Probiotic Traits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Chlorella vulgaris Enhancement on Endogenous Microbial Degradation of Marine Oil Spills and Community Diversity

1
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Control, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
2
School of Marine Science & Technology, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 905; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050905
Submission received: 10 April 2022 / Revised: 23 April 2022 / Accepted: 23 April 2022 / Published: 26 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Microorganisms in Biodegradation and Bioremediation)

Abstract

:
Biofortification could improve the bioremediation efficiency of microbes in the reparation of marine environmental damage caused by oil spills. In this paper, Chlorella vulgaris LH-1 was used as a fortifier to enhance the degradation of a marine oil spill by endogenous microorganisms. The addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the degradation efficiency of crude oil by 11.09–42.41% and considerably accelerated oil degradation efficiency. Adding C. vulgaris LH-1 to a crude oil environment can improve the activity of endogenous seawater microorganisms. The results of high-throughput sequencing showed that the main bacterial genera were Oceanicola, Roseibacillus, and Rhodovulum when exotrophic C. vulgaris LH-1 and seawater endogenous microorganisms degraded low-concentration crude oil together. However, the addition of high-concentration nutrient salts changed the main bacterial genera in seawater to unclassified Microbacterium, Erythrobacter, and Phaeodactylibacter. The addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the abundance of marine bacteria, Rhodococcus, and Methylophaga and decreased the abundance of Pseudomonas, Cladosporium, and Aspergillus. The functional prediction results of phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states indicated that C. vulgaris LH-1 could improve the metabolic ability of seawater endogenous microorganisms to degrade endogenous bacteria and fungi in crude oil.

1. Introduction

With the rapid growth of the global economy, worldwide demand for oil, as well as the occurrence of oil spill accidents in offshore oil facilities, such as tankers and offshore oil platforms, has increased greatly [1,2,3]. Oil spill accidents cause a devastating blow to the marine environment [4,5,6,7]. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in crude oil are harmful to humans [8,9,10].
Bioremediation as a reparation method for oil spills has advantages for marine bacteria, fungi, and algae in the environment because of its ability to remove hydrocarbon pollutants [11,12,13]. This method permeates the oil for repair and is commonly used as a microbial remediation strategy [10]. This method includes microorganism, biological stimulation, and the combination of biological stimulation and biological strengthening. The degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by microorganisms is stimulated by the selection of microorganisms and surrounding nutrients. Therefore, much research has focused on the metabolic properties of various types of bacteria, fungi, and microalgae to repair oil-contaminated areas; the addition of exogenous microbes to enhance degradation of pollutants in the environment; and biofortification, which increases the concentration of microorganisms with a particular metabolic capacity [14,15]. Degradation ability can be improved by changing the environment of bacterial species [16] and modifying nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, as a biological stimulant to improve the biodegradation rate of crude oil in oil-contaminated seawater [17,18]. Some scholars co-cultured exogenous and endogenous bacteria for crude oil degradation and achieved a considerably better degradation efficiency than the inoculation of endogenous bacteria only [19]. The co-culture of local flora and exogenous fungi for crude oil degradation also considerably enhanced the activity of endogenous microorganisms and increased the uniformity and diversity of endogenous bacteria [13].
Chlorella vulgaris is a typical green microalga and has been used in the treatment of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in water environments in recent years, owing to its low nutritional requirements and fast growth cycle [20]. It is an organism that can effectively degrade hydrocarbons [21]. However, as far as we know, few studies have reported on the microalgal enhancement of the endogenous microbial degradation of oil spills.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of C. vulgaris on the degradation of crude oil with different concentrations by endogenous bacteria and fungi and investigate the composition of endogenous bacterial and fungal communities after C. vulgaris enhancement using high-throughput sequencing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Crude Oil and Chemicals

The crude oil sample, C. vulgaris LH-1, and coastal seawater used for cultivating microbes were the same as those described by Li et al. [11]. The crude oil sample used in this study was from China Xingzhong Zhonghua Petroleum Transportation (Zhoushan) Co., Ltd., with a density of about 0.91 g·cm−3. Seawater used for cultivating microbes was collected from coastal waters of Zhoushan (29°57′ N, 122°11′ E). The microalga C. vulgaris LH-1 used in this study was collected from coastal waters of Zhoushan (Genbank accession number KU302752). The chemical reagents used in this research were procured from China National Pharmaceutical Group.

2.2. Preparation of Inoculum and Experimental Medium

The inoculum containing endogenous bacteria and fungi was collected from coastal seawater in Zhoushan (29°57′ N, 122°11′ E) and filtered using a qualitative filter paper to reduce suspended solids. The inoculum was cryopreserved at 4 °C. The inoculant and experimental medium for microorganisms were the same as those described by Chen et al. [1]. C. vulgaris LH-1 was inoculated in the microalgal medium as described by Li et al. [11] at a ratio of 3 mL/100 mL and then cultured in a light incubator under 7000 LX light at 25 °C and shaken 2–3 times a day for 15 days. Afterward, the medium was removed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The algae were retained, and purified water was added until an absorbance of about 1.0 at 600 nm for microalgal inoculation. The pH of the cultures was adjusted to 8.0. All media were sterilized and prepared for inoculation.

2.3. Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Three different groups were set: group A was inoculated with seawater microorganism, group B was inoculated with seawater microorganism and C. vulgaris LH-1, and group C was inoculated with C. vulgaris LH-1. Seawater inoculum and microalgal suspension were inoculated at 3 mL/1 mL (30 mL medium). A 3 mL of inoculum and 3 mL of algal fluid were added to a 100 mL conical flask with 30 mL of medium. All seven inoculated media were cultivated at 25 °C for 14 days in an oscillating incubator. Crude oil concentrations before and after biodegradation were determined at 420 nm by spectrophotometry to calculate the crude oil degradation efficiency as described in Chen et al. [1].

2.4. Biological Activity Assay

Fluorescein diacetate (FDA) was used to characterize the biological activity of microorganisms, which is correlated with biomass. FDA is hydrolyzed by enzymes produced by microorganisms to produce luciferin, which can be determined by spectrophotometry at 490 nm for the characterization of microbial bioactivity.

2.5. PCR Amplification and Illumina Miseq Sequencing

All seven experimental samples were cultivated for 14 days before high-throughput sequencing. The specific methods for microbial DNA extraction and purification were performed according to the protocols of Chen et al. [1]. The barcoded primers were prepared based on the method of Zhou et al. [22] and used to amplify specific regions using a thermonuclear polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system (Gene Amp 9700, ABI, USA). The PCR amplification procedure was in accordance with procedures described by Liu [23]. Sequencing was performed using an Illumina Miseq PE300 platform (Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered with 97% similarity cutoff using UPARSE (version 7.1 http://drive5.com/uparse/, accessed on 6 December 2019) with a novel greedy algorithm that performs chimera filtering and OTU clustering simultaneously. The taxonomy of each 16S rRNA gene sequence was analyzed using the RDP Classifier algorithm (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/, accessed on 6 December 2019) against the Silva (SSU132) 16S rRNA and UNITE (8.0) internal transcribed spacer (ITS) database with a confidence threshold of 70%.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

UPARSE was used to perform the OTU clustering of sequences according to 97% similarity and remove single sequences and chimeras. RDP Classifier was used for the species classification annotation of each sequence. Bacterial 16S was compared with the Silva database (SSU132), and fungal ITS was compared using UNITE, with a comparison threshold of 70%.
Alpha diversity index was used to reflect the richness and diversity of the microbial community, and various diversity indices were analyzed statistically. Sobs, Chao, Ace, and other indices were used to represent the richness of the community. Shannon and Simpson indices were used to represent community diversity and species evenness, respectively. Coverage index was used to reflect the extent of community coverage. The differences in phyla and genera of each sample were analyzed by community column chart and community heat map.
Data analysis and variance analysis were performed using previously described methods [1,11] to deal with differences among parameters. All results are considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 [24].

3. Results

3.1. Crude Oil Biodegradation

Figure 1 shows the crude oil degradation efficiency after 14 days. A comparison of the degradation rates of crude oil under different treatments revealed the potential of endogenous microorganisms in crude oil degradation under the enhancement of C. vulgaris LH-1. The efficiency of C. vulgaris LH-1 alone in degrading crude oil, whether in low-concentration oil (35.36–56.68%) or high-concentration oil (18.87–25.34%), was lower than that of endogenous microorganisms or the mixture of bacteria and algae. The degradation efficiencies of L2B, L3A, and L3B on day 14 were 96.20%, 97.17%, and 99.05%, respectively, whereas the degradation efficiencies of L1A, L1B, and L2A were 81.20%, 86.85%, and 92.40%, respectively.
The trend of crude oil degradation efficiency conformed to the microorganism growth curve. The degradation was slow in the early stage, but the microorganism grew rapidly in the middle stage, and the degradation efficiency was accelerated. The degradation rate slowed down with the consumption of carbon sources and nutrients. At the same nutrient concentration, the degradation rate of crude oil with C. vulgaris LH-1 was higher than that without C. vulgaris LH-1. Crude oil contains a large number of toxic substances, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and a higher crude oil concentration results in increased toxicity. Therefore, the normal growth of some seawater microorganisms is inhibited [25], and the growth period of microorganisms is also relatively prolonged, similarly to H2A, H3A. However, under the same nutritional conditions, H2B and H3B added to C. vulgaris LH-1 quickly entered the logarithmic growth phase, and the degradation rate was accelerated.
When C. vulgaris LH-1 is co-cultured with bacteria and fungi to degrade hydrocarbons, C. vulgaris LH-1 provides oxygen to the bacteria through photosynthesis and improve its degradation efficiency. Bacteria can also grow C. vulgaris LH-1 to provide nutrients. Without added nutrients, the degradation efficiency increased by 11.09% at the higher concentration of 10.00 g/L. The degradation efficiency increased by 42.41% after adding low-concentration nutrient salt and increased by 15.60% after adding high-concentration nutrient salt. The crude oil degradation efficiency enhanced by C. vulgaris LH-1 was remarkably improved by the introduction of exogenous Chlorella.

3.2. FDA Enzyme Activity

Figure 2 shows that the growth rates of L2A and L3A slowed down in the later period, whereas those of L2B and L3B continued to increase. C. vulgaris LH-1 can efficiently fix CO2 and provide a carbon source for bacteria and fungi. In addition, C. vulgaris LH-1 can metabolize organic matter. Among the samples, H3B maintained a steady growth trend. However, H2A, H2B, and H3A had a longer delay period, and the biological activity of H2B was higher at this stage. Without added nutrients, H1A and H1B entered the logarithmic growth period, in which the slow growth period was longer. A previous study reported that adding crude-oil-degrading bacteria to endogenous seawater bacteria could improve crude oil degradation and biological activity to a certain extent. This result is similar to our research results. The addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 can increase the biological activity (i.e., biomass) of endogenous microorganisms. In contrast, although an increase in nutrients can also increase the biomass to some extent, C. vulgaris LH-1 as a bioactive supplement agent is more friendly to other microorganisms.

3.3. OTU Cluster Analysis

As shown in Table 1, 1,065,329 archaeal sequences from 13 samples were obtained by 16S high-throughput sequencing after 14 days of culture. H2B had the fewest sequences (44,009), and L2b had the most sequences (133,024). A total of 27 phyla, 57 classes, 108 orders, 226 families, 686 genera, and 5273 OTUs were detected in the taxa.
A total of 1,309,870 original fungal sequences were obtained from 13 samples by ITS high-throughput amplicon sequencing. L1B had the fewest sequences (37,333), whereas L1A had the most sequences (16,156). A total of 11 phyla, 29 classes, 64 orders, 127 families, 167 genera, and 1869 OTUs were detected in the taxa. The cluster tree diagram of the bacterial samples (Figure 3a) shows that in the seawater group containing low-concentration crude oil, L2A, and L3A were close to each other; L1B and L2B were close to each other; and CK was close to L1B, L2B, and L3B. In addition, the cluster of L1B, L2B, and L3B was far from the cluster of L1A, L2A, and L3A. In the seawater group with high crude oil concentration, H1a was close to H1B, H2A was close to H3B, and H2A was far from H2B. Figure 3b shows the cluster tree diagram of the fungal samples.CK was far from all other samples. The similarity between H3a and H2A was the highest, followed by that between L2A and H3B, between L3A and L2B, and between H1A and H2B.

3.4. Changes in Bacterial and Fungal Diversity under the Influence of Chlorella

Table 2 shows the alpha diversity index of bacteria and fungi in the 13 samples. Among the bacteria, L3A had the most sequences (120,588 sequences), whereas H2B had the fewest sequences (20,090 sequences). H2A and H2B had the most (1226) and fewest OTUs (571), respectively. Comparison of the species richness indices, Ace, and Chao1, revealed that the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the bacterial and fungal richness under the following conditions: high crude oil concentration with high or low nutrient salt concentration and low crude oil concentration with high nutrient salt concentration. However, it decreased the bacterial richness under other conditions. The addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the abundance of bacteria in low crude oil concentrations without nutrient addition, but the opposite was true for high crude oil concentrations. In addition, the bacterial richness of C. vulgaris LH-1 was lower than the blank value because of its low nutrient concentration. The addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased bacterial diversity, except in environments with low crude oil and nutrient concentrations.
Among fungi, H3A had the most sequences (116,515), whereas the L1B condition had the fewest sequences (62,455). CK had the most OTUs (400), whereas L3A had the fewest OTUs (148). The abundance of all fungi affected by crude oil was lower than that in the blank level. Similar to bacterial richness, the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 decreased fungal richness under low nutrient concentrations but increased the fungal richness under high nutrient concentrations.
From the perspective of diversity, the Shannon index analysis showed that the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased fungal diversity after supplementation with low and high nutrient concentrations but decreased the fungal diversity without nutrient addition. Compared with the blank, adding C. vulgaris LH-1 increased fungal diversity in seawater with low-concentration crude oil and added nutrients but decreased the fungal diversity in other conditions. The coverage indices of all the samples were above 99%, which indicates that the sequencing depth was reasonable [26].

3.5. Effects of Chlorella on Bacterial Community Composition and Diversity

The bacterial community composition of seawater with crude oil under the influence of C. vulgaris LH-1 is shown in Figure 4. At the phylum level, the dominant phylum in CK was Actinobacteria, followed by Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Compared with CK, the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 induced regular changes, and the abundance of Proteobacteria decreased [27] considerably with increased nutrient concentration (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Actinomycetes decreased in L3B compared with the blank and was extremely low in L1B and L2B. No remarkable differences in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes were found between CK and L1B, but the abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased in L2B and increased in L3B. The relative abundances of Verrucomicrobiota were greater in L1B and L2B than in CK but had no substantial difference between L1B and L2B. The addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and increased the relative abundance of Phylloidetes compared with the absence of C. vulgaris LH-1.
At the genus level, the microbial abundance in CK was similar to that in L1B, L2B, and L3B, which were added with C. vulgaris LH-1. The dominant genera in CK were Ilumatobacter and unclassified Acidimicrobiales. L1B and L2B had the same main bacterial genera, namely Oceanicola, Roseibacillus, Rhodovulum, and Planctomicrobium. The dominant genera in L3B were unclassified Microbacterium, Erythrobacter, and Phaeodactylibacter.
The bacterial community composition in seawater with crude oil under the influence of C. vulgaris LH-1 is shown in Figure 5. In the sample cluster tree, CK was the farthest away from the other samples, and H1B was closer to H1A. The same trend was observed in the low-concentration crude oil at the gate level. Proteobacteria remained the dominant phylum under all conditions, and its abundance was lower under the influence of C. vulgaris LH-1 than without C. vulgaris LH-1. Except for the blank, the relative abundance of Actinomycetes was the highest in H2B. The abundance of Microflora verrucosa was higher in the environment without nutrient supplementation than in other environments but was very low in the environment with low and high nutrient supplementation. The addition of Bacteroidetes and C. vulgaris LH-1 also induced regular changes. C. vulgaris LH-1 promoted the abundance of Bacteroidetes under the influence of high crude oil concentration.
The dominant genera in H1B were Alkanophagus, Rhizomonas, and Marinobacter, but the abundances of these three genera were extremely low in CK. Previous studies showed that bacteria in genus Filomonas play a major role in the stress caused by pristane and PAHs [28].The dominant genera in H2B were Brevundimonas, Ilumatobacter, and unclassified bacteria. The dominant genera in H3B were Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, Alcanivorax, and Ruegeria.
In the seawater group containing 0.01 g/L crude oil, some bacterial genera were affected by C. vulgaris LH-1, as shown in Table 3. Under the same nutritional conditions, the relative abundances of Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Ralstonia, Cladomonas, and Aspergillus decreased under the influence of C. vulgaris LH-1. In comparison, the abundances of marine fungi, Rhodococcus, Methylophaga, Planctomicrobium, Gimesia, Phaeodactylibacter, and unclassified Hortaea increased with C. vulgaris LH-1. In addition, Planctomicrobium and Gimesia did not exist in the absence of C. vulgaris LH-1.

3.6. Effects of Chlorella on Fungal Community Composition and Diversity

The influence of C. vulgaris LH-1 on the fungal community of seawater with 0.01 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations is shown in Figure 6. At the phylum level, L3A, L1A, and L2A were relatively close to each other in the sample cluster tree diagram, whereas CK and L1B had a high similarity. The dominant phylum in CK was unclassified fungi (possibly eukaryotic or unidentifiable), followed by Ascomycota. The vantage gate in L1B was also unclassified. The abundance of unclassified fungi in L2B decreased, but the abundances of Ascomyces and Basidiomycota increased. L3B had the same main phyla as L2B. Compared with CK, L3B had decreased abundance of unclassified fungi and increased abundance of Ascomyces and Basidiomycota. At the inoculum level, the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 decreased the abundance of Ascomycetes but increased the abundance of unclassified fungi.
The most dominant genus in CK was unclassified, followed by Hortaea and Cladosporium. The most dominant genus in L1B was also unclassified, and the only genera with relative abundances greater than 1% were Cladoides and Aspergillus. Moreover, L2B had a higher diversity index than L1B, and the top five in relative abundance were unclassified, Unclassified_Hypocreales, Unclassified_Pleosporales, and Candida. The dominant genera in L3B were unclassified, Cutaneotrichosporon, Wallemia, Unclassified_Eurotiales, and Cladoides. The genera in L2B and L3B differed greatly compared with those in CK.
The effects of the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 on the fungal community in seawater with 10.00 g/L crude and different nutrient concentrations are shown in Figure 7. “Unclassified” was the dominant phylum in H1B; the abundance of “Unclassified” in H1B was greater than that in H2B but less than that in H3B. The main phyla in H1B were Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. Ascomycetes was the dominant phylum in H2B and H3B, and Basidiomycetes was the dominant phylum in H2B and H3B. In the sample cluster tree, CK was close to H2A, whereas H3B was the farthest from other conditional diversity. At the genus level, “Unclassified” was low in abundance in H3B but was dominant under other conditions. Nigrospoa, the dominant genus in H1B, was not detected under other conditions. The main genera in H2B were Aspergillus and Blastomyces. The dominant genera in H3B included unclassified Agaricata, unclassified fungi, and Cladophyllus.

3.7. KEGG Statistics and Difference Analysis

PICRUSt predicted 328 pathways based on 16S sequences, including primary KEGG pathways, as shown in Figure 8 in the heat map of secondary functional abundance based on KEGG. In the crude oil seawater group, the top 10 pathways in terms of average abundances included membrane transport, amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, replication and repair, energy metabolism, poorly categorized functions, and translation. In addition, the differences in the function of co-factors and lipid metabolism in the sample trees were consistent with the differences in bacterial levels. Amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, and sugar metabolism, as well as secondary metabolites in the metabolism and other metabolic pathways, were high because adding C. vulgaris LH-1 increased metabolic abundance. C. vulgaris LH-1 increased certain metabolic substances to provide nutrients for the bacteria, improved the activity of the bacteria, and improved the crude oil degradation efficiency.

4. Discussion

The crude oil degradation efficiency in seawater polluted by crude oil was 26.60%, 46.45%, and 60.69% without nutrient addition, with low nutrient addition, and with high nutrient addition, respectively. The introduction of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the degradation efficiency to 29.55%, 66.15%, and 70.13%, representing an increase of 11.09%, 42.41%, and 15.60%, without nutrient addition, with low nutrient addition, and with high nutrient addition, respectively. The bacterial–algal system improved the degradation effect of aliphatic and aromatic oils [29]. In seawater containing low-concentration crude oil, the oil degradation efficiency was close to 100% after the addition of nutrients, and the degradation rate of C. vulgaris LH-1 was remarkably accelerated after the enhancement. Bacteria, fungi, and microalgae in the environment are able to remove hydrocarbon pollutants [11,12,30]. The complex community composed of bacteria, fungi, and microalgae can biodegrade hydrocarbons [31,32]. Among all microorganisms, bacteria are the main degrading organisms and the most active factors in the degradation of petroleum pollutants [33,34]. The combination of algae and bacteria produces many beneficial effects. Microalgae are responsible for photosynthesis and can provide oxygen for bacteria to absorb and degrade the CO2 released by organic pollutants. Therefore, the enhancement of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the crude oil degradation efficiency.
C. vulgaris LH-1 enhanced the remediation of seawater containing 10.00 g/L crude oil. The dominant bacteria in the crude-oil-containing seawater without additional nutrients were Alcanivorax and Rhizomonas. Bacteria in Filomonas play a major role in the stress of pristane and PAHs [28]. The dominant species in seawater with 0.02 g/L nutrient restoration was Brevunmdimonas, whereas the dominant species in seawater with 2.00 g/L nutrient restoration was Halomonas. The dominant genera were different under the three different nutritional conditions, but all had the highest abundance of Alcanivorax. Alkylophagous fungi have strong hydrocarbon degradation ability and can use alkanes and various alkyl benzene derivatives as carbon and energy sources. Since the discovery of the alkyl-eating bacteria, all isolated strains have been reported to degrade aliphatic compounds [35]. In the present study, the abundance of Alcanivorax was relatively low in seawater containing low crude oil concentrations, which indicates that high hydrocarbon concentrations can stimulate the growth of Alcanivorax. In contrast, Methylotrophs were found only in seawater with low crude oil concentrations and were not detected in seawater with high crude oil concentrations. Methylotrophs can grow in environments where n-acetane is the only carbon source and energy source, proving that they have the ability to degrade hydrocarbons [36].
The enhancement caused by C. vulgaris LH-1 changed the community of bacteria and fungi in oil-polluted seawater; fungi can be also co-cultured with other bacteria and fungi to enhance hydrocarbon biodegradation [37]. The results of high-fluence sequencing showed that in the seawater group containing low crude oil concentrations, the main bacterial genera were marine bacteria, such as Roseibacillus and Rhodonococcus, regardless of nutrient salt addition. The main bacterial genera added with high nutrient concentration were unclassified Micrococcaceae, Erythrobacter, and Phaeodactylibacter. In addition, the abundance of Marine bacteria, Rhodococcus, and Gibberella increased with the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1, whereas the abundance of Pseudomonas, Cladiomyces, and Aspergillus decreased. Under the influence of C. vulgaris LH-1, the abundance of Cladophyllus and Aspergillus decreased, whereas the abundance of Hortaea increased. The addition of chloreous algae at high crude oil concentrations increased the abundance of unclassified Hypocreales, which were isolated from a variety of tar spheres and are able to rapidly mineralize benzopyrene [38]. Cryozoa is a common oil-degrading bacterium. Its abundance was very low in the seawater environment with 2.00 g/L nutrient added, but its abundance was high at a lower nutrient concentration. Some studies found that the Erythrobacter isolated from C. vulgaris LH-1-treated seawater has 95% homology with genus Cryozoa [39]. This may be the reason for the increase in the abundance of Cryozoa under the influence of C. vulgaris LH-1. Erythrobacter is a genus of the Erythrobacter family. Many PAH-degrading strains have been isolated from marine sediments. Zhou [40] used co-metabolism technology to degrade coking wastewater in a reactor and found Planctomicrobium as the main genus in the system containing glucose and a small amount of urea. Studies showed that C. vulgaris LH-1 can metabolize polysaccharides, proteins, and other substances and provide available carbon sources for Planctomicrobium to improve its abundance. Pseudomonas has a strong ability to degrade PAHs and can also produce biosurfactants; therefore, it has been widely used in oil spill treatment [41,42].

5. Conclusions

In this study, the degradation efficiency of crude oil was improved by the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1, regardless of the addition of low- or high-concentration nutrients in the seawater polluted by crude oil. The degradation efficiencies in seawater containing high crude oil concentrations without nutrient salt, with low-nutrient salt, and with high-nutrient salt were 26.60%, 46.45%, and 60.69%, respectively. The introduction of Chlorella increased the degradation efficiencies to 29.55%, 66.15%, and 70.13%, representing an increase of 11.09%, 42.41%, and 15.60%, without nutrient salt, with low-nutrient salt, and with high-nutrient salt, respectively. The oil degradation efficiency in seawater containing low-concentration crude oil was close to 100% after the addition of nutrients, and the degradation rate of C. vulgaris LH-1 was considerably accelerated after the enhancement. High-throughput sequencing results showed that C. vulgaris LH-1 intensively repaired seawater containing 0.01 g/L crude oil. The addition of 0.02 g/L nutrient changed the main species to marine species, such as Roseibacillus. The addition of 2.00 g/L nutrient in the repair of oil-containing seawater changed the main species to unclassified microbacteria, E. coli, and Phaeodactylibacter. Moreover, the addition of C. vulgaris LH-1 increased the abundance of marine bacteria, Rhodococcus, and Gibberella and decreased the abundance of Pseudomonas, Cladiomyces, and Aspergillus. The enhanced remediation of C. vulgaris LH-1 contained 10.00 g/L crude oil seawater group, and the dominant bacteria in the seawater without additional nutrients were Alcanivorax borkumensis and Rhizomonas. The addition of 0.02 g/L nutrients changed the dominant genus to Brevunmdimonas, and the addition of 2.00 g/L nutrients changed the dominant genus to Halomonas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization Q.C.; methodology, Z.S. and M.L.; investigation, Z.S., M.L., J.G. and B.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.S. and M.L.; writing—review and editing B.Z., J.G., Q.C. and H.T.; funding acquisition, B.Z., M.L., H.T. and Q.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was founded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1809214, No.22005269), Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Research Project (No. LGF20D060001, No. LGF22D060003), the Key Research and Development project of Zhejiang Province (No. 2021C03152), and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LQ21B030007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article. The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time, as the data also form part of an ongoing study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sinochem Xingzhong Petroleum Transportation (Zhoushan) Co., Ltd. for crude oil sample support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chen, Q.; Bao, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhu, B.; Mu, J.; Chen, Z. Effects of marine oil pollution on microbial diversity in coastal waters and stimulating indigenous microorganism bioremediation with nutrients. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2020, 39, 101395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moradi, A.; Mosaddeghi, M.R.; Chavoshi, E.; Safadoust, A.; Soleimani, M. Effect of crude oil-induced water repellency on transport of Escherichia coli and bromide through repacked and physically-weathered soil columns. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 255, 113230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ritchie, L.A. Individual Stress, Collective Trauma, and social capital in the wake of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Sociol. Inq. 2012, 82, 187–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuppusamy, S.; Maddela, N.R.; Megharaj, M.; Venkateswarlu, K. Ecological Impacts of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. In Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 95–138. [Google Scholar]
  5. Naz, S.; Iqbal, M.F.; Mahmood, I.; Allam, M. Marine oil spill detection using Synthetic Aperture Radar over Indian Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 162, 111921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Perez-Cadahia, B.; Lafuente, A.; Cabaleiro, T.; Pasaro, E.; Mendez, J.; Laffon, B. Initial study on the effects of Prestige oil on human health. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, C.; Cai, B.; Liu, Y. Research on transport and weathering of oil spills in Jiaozhou Bight, China. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2022, 51, 102197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Costa, A.S.; Romao, L.P.; Araujo, B.R.; Lucas, S.C.; Maciel, S.T.; Wisniewski, A., Jr.; Alexandre, M.R. Environmental strategies to remove volatile aromatic fractions (BTEX) from petroleum industry wastewater using biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 105, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Souza, E.C.; Vessoni-Penna, T.C.; De Souza Oliveira, R.P. Biosurfactant-enhanced hydrocarbon bioremediation: An overview. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 2014, 89, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Muthukumar, B.; Al Salhi, M.S.; Narenkumar, J.; Devanesan, S.; Rao, T.N.; Kim, W.; Rajasekar, A. Characterization of two novel strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biodegradation of crude oil and its enzyme activities. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 304, 119223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Bao, B.; Liu, M.; Bao, M.; Liu, J.; Mu, J. RNA-seq analysis reveals the significant effects of different light conditions on oil degradation by marine Chlorella vulgaris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 137, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vural, C.; Vural, C.; Ozdemir, G. Monitoring of the degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons by bioaugmented activated sludge. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 95, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Kong, D.; Liu, X.; Shen, S. Synergistic degradation of crude oil by indigenous bacterial consortium and exogenous fungus Scedosporium boydii. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 264, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Madueño, L.; Coppotelli, B.M.; Alvarez, H.M.; Morelli, I.S. Isolation and characterization of indigenous soil bacteria for bioaugmentation of PAH contaminated soil of semiarid Patagonia, Argentina. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 2011, 65, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Semrany, S.; Favier, L.; Djelal, H.; Taha, S.; Amrane, A. Bioaugmentation: Possible solution in the treatment of Bio-Refractory Organic Compounds (Bio-ROCs). Biochem. Eng. J. 2012, 69, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cerqueira, V.S.; Hollenbach, E.B.; Maboni, F.; Vainstein, M.H.; Camargo, F.A.; Do Carmo, R.P.M.; Bento, F.M. Biodegradation potential of oily sludge by pure and mixed bacterial cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 11003–11010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hesnawi, R.M.; Adbeib, M.M. Effect of Nutrient Source on Indigenous Biodegradation of Diesel Fuel Contaminated Soil. APCBEE Procedia 2013, 5, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hoof, L.V. Co-management: An alternative to enforcement? ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2010, 67, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tao, K.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Hu, X.; Cao, L.; Yuan, X. Biodegradation of crude oil by a defined co-culture of indigenous bacterial consortium and exogenous Bacillus subtilis. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stephens, E.; Ross, I.L.; King, Z.; Mussgnug, J.H.; Kruse, O.; Posten, C.; Borowitzka, M.A.; Hankamer, B. An economic and technical evaluation of microalgal biofuels. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xaaldi Kalhor, A.; Movafeghi, A.; Mohammadi-Nassab, A.D.; Abedi, E.; Bahrami, A. Potential of the green alga Chlorella vulgaris for biodegradation of crude oil hydrocarbons. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 123, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, C.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, X. Transformation of acetaminophen in natural surface water and the change of aquatic microbes. Water. Res. 2019, 148, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, R.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Fang, J.; Zhang, L.; Luo, M. Depth-Resolved Distribution of Particle-Attached and Free-Living Bacterial Communities in the Water Column of the New Britain Trench. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, H.-Z.; Li, J.; Yi, Y.; Nobu, M.K.; Narihiro, T.; Tang, Y.-Q. Response to inhibitory conditions of acetate-degrading methanogenic microbial community. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2020, 129, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haritash, A.K.; Kaushik, C.P. Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, Y.-Q.; Ji, P.; Lai, G.-L.; Chi, C.-Q.; Liu, Z.-S.; Wu, X.-L. Diverse microbial community from the coalbeds of the Ordos Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 90–91, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pi, Y.-R.; Bao, M.-T. Investigation of kinetics in bioaugmentation of crude oil via high-throughput sequencing: Enzymatic activities, bacterial community composition and functions. Pet. Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Wang, B.; Dong, W.; Hu, X. Co-acclimation of bacterial communities under stresses of hydrocarbons with different structures. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tang, X.; He, L.Y.; Tao, X.Q.; Dang, Z.; Guo, C.L.; Lu, G.N.; Yi, X.Y. Construction of an artificial microalgal-bacterial consortium that efficiently degrades crude oil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 1158–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Daccò, C.; Girometta, C.; Asemoloye, M.D.; Carpani, G.; Picco, A.M.; Tosi, S. Key fungal degradation patterns, enzymes and their applications for the removal of aliphatic hydrocarbons in polluted soils: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 147, 104866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jacques, R.J.S.; Okeke, B.C.; Bento, F.M.; Teixeira, A.S.; Peralba, M.C.R.; Camargo, F.A. Microbial consortium bioaugmentation of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated soil. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 2637–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, F.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Chen, W.; Huang, Q. Characterization of a phenanthrene-degrading microbial consortium enriched from petrochemical contaminated environment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 115, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abbasian, F.; Lockington, R.; Mallavarapu, M.; Naidu, R. A Comprehensive Review of Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Biodegradation by Bacteria. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 670–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Meckenstock, R.U.; Boll, M.; Mouttaki, H.; Koelschbach, J.S.; Cunha Tarouco, P.; Weyrauch, P.; Dong, X.; Himmelberg, A.M. Anaerobic Degradation of Benzene and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 92–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dutta, T.K.; Harayama, S. Biodegradation of n-alkylcycloalkanes and n-alkylbenzenes via new pathways in Alcanivorax sp. strain MBIC 4326. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 1970–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gutierrez, T.; Aitken, M.D. Role of methylotrophs in the degradation of hydrocarbons during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. ISME J. 2014, 8, 2543–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ali Khan, A.H.; Tanveer, S.; Anees, M.; Muhammad, Y.S.; Iqbal, M.; Yousaf, S. Role of nutrients and illuminance in predicting the fate of fungal mediated petroleum hydrocarbon degradation and biomass production. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 176, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shinde, V.L.; Suneel, V.; Shenoy, B.D. Diversity of bacteria and fungi associated with tarballs: Recent developments and future prospects. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 117, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brown, L.M.; Gunasekera, T.S.; Bowen, L.L.; Ruiz, O.N. Draft Genome Sequence of Rhodovulum sp. Strain NI22, a Naphthalene-Degrading Marine Bacterium. Genome. Announc. 2015, 3, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, J.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Wan, D.; Mai, W.; Sun, C. Cometabolic degradation of low-strength coking wastewater and the bacterial community revealed by high-throughput sequencing. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chebbi, A.; Hentati, D.; Zaghden, H.; Baccar, N.; Rezgui, F.; Chalbi, M.; Sayadi, S.; Chamkha, M. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation and biosurfactant production by a newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. strain from used motor oil-contaminated soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 122, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rabodonirina, S.; Rasolomampianina, R.; Krier, F.; Drider, D.; Merhaby, D.; Net, S.; Ouddane, B. Degradation of fluorene and phenanthrene in PAHs-contaminated soil using Pseudomonas and Bacillus strains isolated from oil spill sites. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Biodegradation efficiency of crude oil treated with different nutrient concentrations within 14 days. (a) Seawater degradation efficiency of 0.01 g/L crude oil (b) Seawater degradation efficiency of 10.00 g/L crude oil.
Figure 1. Biodegradation efficiency of crude oil treated with different nutrient concentrations within 14 days. (a) Seawater degradation efficiency of 0.01 g/L crude oil (b) Seawater degradation efficiency of 10.00 g/L crude oil.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g001
Figure 2. Hydrolytic activity under different treatments during biodegradation within 14 days. (a) FDA hydrolytic activity of 0.01 g/L crude oil. (b) FDA hydrolytic activity of 10.00 g/L crude oil.
Figure 2. Hydrolytic activity under different treatments during biodegradation within 14 days. (a) FDA hydrolytic activity of 0.01 g/L crude oil. (b) FDA hydrolytic activity of 10.00 g/L crude oil.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g002
Figure 3. OTU cluster tree of bacteria and fungi. (a) Bacterial Level. (b) Fungi Level.
Figure 3. OTU cluster tree of bacteria and fungi. (a) Bacterial Level. (b) Fungi Level.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g003
Figure 4. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 supplementation on bacterial community in seawater with 0.01 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Figure 4. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 supplementation on bacterial community in seawater with 0.01 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g004
Figure 5. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 supplementation on bacterial community in seawater containing 10.00 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Figure 5. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 supplementation on bacterial community in seawater containing 10.00 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g005
Figure 6. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 supplementation on fungal communities in seawater with 0.01 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Figure 6. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 supplementation on fungal communities in seawater with 0.01 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g006
Figure 7. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 addition on fungal communities in seawater containing 10.00 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Figure 7. Effects of C. vulgaris LH-1 addition on fungal communities in seawater containing 10.00 g/L crude oil and different nutrient concentrations. (a) Phylum Level. (b) Genus Level.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g007
Figure 8. Heat map of KEGG secondary function abundance. (a) KEGG secondary function abundance heat map of 0.01 g/L crude oil. (b) KEGG secondary function abundance heat map of 10.00 g/L crude oil.
Figure 8. Heat map of KEGG secondary function abundance. (a) KEGG secondary function abundance heat map of 0.01 g/L crude oil. (b) KEGG secondary function abundance heat map of 10.00 g/L crude oil.
Microorganisms 10 00905 g008
Table 1. Bacteria and fungi information statistics.
Table 1. Bacteria and fungi information statistics.
ClassificationSampleBarcodeRaw_numMean_lenClean_numMean_len
BacteriaCKGTCCCA54,361447.8254,241405.60
L1AATCGCA86,397465.7086,238424.52
L1BTTACGA113,931453.07113,690411.30
L2ATGTTAT92,096467.2191,959426.35
L2BGCCATC133,024451.07132,736409.36
L3ATGTGTT126,295467.90126,121427.23
L3BTAGGAC68,698451.4068,644410.60
H1ATGGACG45,333459.6045,296418.81
H1BCGATGT59,305458.4159,250417.59
H2ATCCTGT113,531464.18113,409422.99
H2BGAAGGC44,009449.1943,957407.94
H3AATGTCA44,843458.8244,805417.50
H3BCGGTTA83,506456.4483,394415.26
FungiCKTACGACA90,066326.1089,182283.14
L1ATGTGCTA161,561162.8775,719236.57
L1BTCACTCG67,333344.8166,047305.03
L2ATACTCTG94,398235.6877,000232.07
L2BTGGACTC99,821284.5598,355243.28
L3ATCTGTAG95,305265.1488,416237.09
L3BTACACTC89,859251.2181,584224.43
H1ATGATCGC84,263271.1180,680235.59
H1BTCGTCAT116,317263.1180,979288.47
H2ATATCAGC97,088247.4189,636217.09
H2BTGCGACG85,628265.3777,701236.30
H3AATACAGA134,335206.03116,955178.19
H3BATGTCTC93,896264.4190,499227.13
Table 2. Sequence analysis of bacterial and fungal samples.
Table 2. Sequence analysis of bacterial and fungal samples.
ClassificationSampleSeq_numOTUShannonACEChao1CoverageSimpson
BacteriaCK37,9079072.95261025.1650958.02030.99540.2005
H1A40,2977713.28911185.58601086.39100.99190.1139
H1B50,6379203.18651302.40101144.38500.99350.1328
H2A93,14912262.59401594.58201461.09700.99580.2437
H2B20,0905713.8727901.8986808.05220.98840.0624
H3A36,7905742.3597861.5187760.23380.99350.1981
H3B57,0118813.21641270.62301127.28200.99400.1033
L1A80,9878882.35451183.18801135.95900.99640.2548
L1B75,2518973.77091113.40301038.30300.99690.0656
L2A86,4148541.73501109.26001045.95100.99690.3662
L2B63,4717033.7776852.4927811.28910.99740.0511
L3A120,5889151.41631173.56101069.39600.99780.4090
L3B57,4889442.86661303.82701195.31900.99430.1677
FungiCK87,7854003.2318416.1471405.17860.99970.0898
H1A80,0812193.2326563.8095333.48720.99880.0588
H1B79,4883543.1260370.2629357.95450.99960.0946
H2A88,0902422.3100290.8538270.55770.99940.2681
H2B77,2431732.9895322.7502241.05560.99940.0969
H3A116,5152052.0583260.2814238.54900.99950.3007
H3B89,8891732.4210246.1856224.48390.99940.2019
L1A75,3421523.0662352.5439219.53570.99920.0722
L1B62,4453251.8302359.2254336.05880.99920.3602
L2A76,4721982.8612303.8780285.56760.99890.0950
L2B97,3541843.4065229.1768213.40000.99950.0540
L3A87,7571482.7871228.3164199.20690.99940.1173
L3B80,7232023.4413274.5173242.52630.99930.0579
Table 3. Bacteria affected by C. vulgaris LH-1 at low crude oil concentration.
Table 3. Bacteria affected by C. vulgaris LH-1 at low crude oil concentration.
PhylumGenusAbundance Ratio %
CKL1AL1BL2AL2BL3AL3B
ProteobacteriaOceanicola1.140.0917.590.0211.040.011.62
Rhodovulum0.1309.740.019.7100.34
Erythrobacter0.420.361.2700.540.0220.08
Methylophaga01.972.891.582.770.010.95
Pseudomonas1.5970.123.2784.214.5789.770.23
Burkholderia0.041.420.12.20.172.730.01
Ralstonia0.010.770.061.060.081.410.01
PlanctomycetesPlanctomicrobium0.0209.72013.7803.17
Gimesia0.0303.6309.7400.71
BacteroidetesPhaeodactylibacter0.270.020.920.041.780.0213.88
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, Z.; Liu, M.; Bao, B.; Guo, J.; Tao, H.; Zhu, B.; Chen, Q. Effects of Chlorella vulgaris Enhancement on Endogenous Microbial Degradation of Marine Oil Spills and Community Diversity. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050905

AMA Style

Song Z, Liu M, Bao B, Guo J, Tao H, Zhu B, Chen Q. Effects of Chlorella vulgaris Enhancement on Endogenous Microbial Degradation of Marine Oil Spills and Community Diversity. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Zhao, Mei Liu, Bo Bao, Jian Guo, Hengcong Tao, Baikang Zhu, and Qingguo Chen. 2022. "Effects of Chlorella vulgaris Enhancement on Endogenous Microbial Degradation of Marine Oil Spills and Community Diversity" Microorganisms 10, no. 5: 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop