With the advance and development of science and technology, research of the microscale has became a hot trend in recent decades. Since the interaction with the microscale object is a major step in research, micromanipulation technology becomes an essential tool. It has been widely used in various fields including micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), micro-assembly, biology, etc. [1
Specific operations of micromanipulation include positioning, griping, puncturing, injecting, etc. Among different operations, micro-/nano-positioning is considered as the most basic one [6
], because most of the other operations are the extended application of positioning. For example, gripping is implemented by the relative positioning of two gripper tips; puncturing is the positioning of the needle, etc. The precision of the used positioning method directly affects the accuracy of the corresponding operation, especially at a small scale at the micro-/nano-meter level. Therefore, precision positioning plays a key role in the micromanipulation domain.
The majority of conventional positioning stages transmit force and motion by using rigid mechanisms, e.g., joints and linkages, lead screw driving and rack gear driving. Due to the existence of unavoidable friction and backlash between the interconnected rigid components, the positioning accuracy is greatly degraded. Although it is unapparent in large-scale (like centimeter- or meter-level) applications, the inaccuracy caused is significant at the small scale (micro- and nano-meter level).
Unlike rigid mechanisms, compliant mechanisms transmit force and motion by using the deformation of the structure within the elastic range of the material [7
]. In this way, no friction and backlash will be incurred during the operation. Therefore, to fulfill the demand of high accuracy, compliant mechanisms are more suitable to use in micro-/nano-positioning technology [9
As the main part of compliant mechanisms, the flexure hinge affects the overall performance in terms of three aspects: kinematic accuracy, dexterity and distribution of stress. In practical applications, different priorities can be adopted to determine the shape of the flexure hinge, which includes rectangular, circular, elliptical, parabolic, hyperbolic, etc. [8
]. For example, in general, the rectangular type has high dexterity and low concentrated stress, but its kinematic accuracy is low; the right-circle type has good kinematic accuracy, but it has lower dexterity and higher concentrated stress. Besides, the fabrication should be also considered, e.g., the right angle of the rectangular type is usually fabricated as the corner-filleted type in practice, and the performance may be changed. In addition, machining imperfections also lead to a different kinematic performance [10
With many years of research, there are many designs for compliant micro-/nano-positioning stages. In the literature, the research works of compliant mechanisms in micro-/nano-scale manipulation have been well developed and concluded [11
]. In this paper, by surveying the related research in recent years and summarizing the methods, processes and components used in the designs, a design flow is proposed by considering the main design factors. It provides a reference for future work.
The following sections of the paper are organized as follows. Section 2
gives a brief introduction of the most-used actuators, including their working principles, advantages and disadvantages. Section 3
presents two kinds of stroke amplifiers and their improved derivative types. Section 4
classifies three popular kinematic connecting schemes for constructing a multi-degree-of-freedom (multi-DOF) positioning stage. Section 5
introduces the application of the dimension, shape and topology optimizations in the design process. Section 6
discusses the current problem of compliant micro-/nano-positioning stages. At last, Section 7
concludes the paper with the proposal of a design flow as a reference.
This section briefly introduces four kinds of actuators, which are popularly adopted in micro-/nano-positioning stage design [11
]. The classification is based on their working principles, i.e., electromagnetic, electrostatic, electrothermal and piezoelectric effects. The introduced actuators can cover the stroke requirement ranging from the sub-nanometer to centimeter scale. Therefore, they are widely used with compliant mechanisms in the field of micro-/nano-positioning. Furthermore, a detailed survey about the performance and selection of actuators can be found in [19
2.1. Electromagnetic Actuator
Based on the interaction between the magnetic field from the permanent magnet and energized coil, the electromagnetic actuator (EMA) can convert electrical energy into mechanical energy without friction [20
]; Figure 1
a shows a typical EMA, i.e., voice coil motor (VCM).
Depending on various sizes and designs, EMAs can provide effective strokes ranging from the micrometer to centimeter scale [21
]. Since the positioning accuracy only relates to the feedback and control system, the EMA can easily achieve nanometer-level resolution with a suitable configuration. Meanwhile, the inertia of the moving part (either coil or magnet) needs attention in the design of control systems. Moreover, unlike the relationship between displacement and force of the other three types of actuators, the force output of EMA is adjustable under a fixed displacement output by changing the applied current [23
]. This property can be used in the control system, which emphasizes robustness [24
In general, due to its bulky size and difficulty in fabrication, EMA is considered if a relative large stroke (in the millimeter or centimeter scale) is required [25
2.2. Electrostatic Actuator
The electrostatic actuator (ESA) is a kind of microactuator driven by electrostatic force. As a capacitor with one of its electrodes fixed, when a voltage is applied, its free electrode will move to change its capacitance to counteract the voltage change [27
]. Figure 1
b shows a simplified comb-drive actuator.
The output direction of ESA depends on how its free electrode is constrained by the guiding mechanisms, e.g., normal or parallel to the capacitor’s plate surface. Besides, the ESA can also provide in-plane rotary output by curving the plate, which is widely applied in microgrippers [28
]. In previous research, ESAs were generally integrated into the mechanical part to form a monolithic structure and then fabricated by chip manufacturing processes, e.g., silicon on insulator (SOI), low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) [32
], etc. Therefore, ESA is mostly used to drive a planar structure.
The advantages of ESA include high power efficiency, high dynamic performance, and a hysteresis-free input-output relationship [36
]. However, its generated force is relative low, which lies at the nanonewton to millinewton level [11
]. On the other hand, most ESAs are integrated into a monolithic structure. Therefore, the relatively high driving voltage may affect the applicability in operating the target, e.g., cell gripping in the field of bio-technology [39
2.3. Electrothermal Actuator
The electrothermal actuator (ETA) is a kind of actuator based on the material’s thermal expansion. As the conductor has resistance, according to Ohm’s law, when the current passes through the conductor, it will generate joule heat. Then, the joule heat will cause thermal expansion of the conductor. Figure 1
c shows the working principle of ETA. In addition, ETA involves three main types, i.e., hot/cold arm, chevron-shaped (V-beam) and bi-morph [11
Both ESA and ETA are usually fabricated by chip manufacturing process with a monolithic structure. As compared to ESA, ETA can generate a larger force with a more compact structure and relative lower driving voltage requirement, and it also provides high accuracy output with good repeatability [40
]. However, ETA’s working principle governs that it has some problems like low frequency, high power consumption and nonlinear movement [41
]. Nevertheless, the high operating temperature may have a great impact on the ambient environment and operated target [43
2.4. Piezoelectric Actuator
The piezoelectric actuator (PEA) is a kind of actuator based on the reverse piezoelectric effect of ionic crystals [46
], i.e., by applying an external electrical field, the piezoelectric material will elongate to adjust its internal electrical field to resist the change. Figure 1
d shows the reverse piezoelectric effect of a single layer of piezoelectric material (in d33 mode). The forms of PEA can be stack-based and film-based. At present, stack-based PEA is mostly used for actuation, because it is stacked by multiple layers of piezoelectric material, which provides a reasonably large output force and stroke. In addition, the ease of use makes PEA the most widely-used actuator in micro-/nano-positioning.
The greatest advantage of PEA is the large generated force up to the kilonewton level. Besides, the high response speed and sub-nanometer-scale resolution are also beneficial to implement precision manipulation [47
]. However, PEA’s capacity will be changed during the operation, which causes a severe hysteresis to its input voltage-output displacement relationship. To achieve a higher precision control, the modeling of PEA’s hysteresis is important for designing controllers [49
]. In addition, since the tensile strength of PEA is much lower than its compressive strength, preloaded PEA is a solution to avoid damage. A suitable preload is recommended to ensure that PEA retains a good dynamic performance. Therefore, a preload adjustable design needs to be integrated into the stage.
3. Stroke Amplifiers
The maximum stroke of an actuator is fixed and limited, especially for PEA, the stroke of which is only 0.1% to 0.2% of the length of the piezoelectric material [54
]. Once a larger stroke is desired, the available solutions include reselecting the actuator with a larger stroke, using more actuators in series or using a stroke amplifier. In practice, by either reselecting the actuator or using more actuators, the cost is much more than that of using an amplifier, because the amplification mechanisms are able to be integrated in the original mechanical design. Therefore, using a stroke amplifier to amplify the small stroke is an efficient choice to obtain a large stroke. The most widely-used amplification mechanisms can be classified into bridge type and lever type [56
In this section, these two kinds of amplifiers and their improved derivative types are reviewed.
3.1. Lever-Type Amplifier
The compliant lever amplifier is based on the simple lever principle. With a certain input force, the magnitude and direction of output force are able to be adjusted by adjusting the length of the effort arm, load arm and the position of the fulcrum. Besides, the input and output strokes also depend on the stiffness of the amplifier and the connected external mechanisms. With a small deflection, the input and output motion can be approximated as a linear relation. Although the size of the lever-type amplifier is relatively large, its large lateral stiffness is still a non-negligible benefit for some applications. Figure 2
shows the fundamental mechanism of a lever amplifier.
Owing to the simple mechanism and principle, many researchers have adopted the lever amplifier to obtain a desired stroke. For instance, Gan et al. [57
] used a lever amplifier to amplify the stroke of PEA. More researchers, such as Bhagat et al. [58
], Li et al. [59
], Dao et al. [60
], Qu et al. [61
] and Ren et al. [62
], used a similar lever amplifier. In addition, the guiding mechanism is added to the output end of the lever to enhance the directionality of the output motion. Gao et al. [63
] designed a differential lever amplifier (see Figure 3
), which has a high lateral stiffness. With the same space, it is able to obtain a larger amplification ratio as compared to the conventional design.
3.2. Bridge-Type Amplifier
Another popular type of amplifier is the bridge type. It can generate a pure linear output motion. Figure 4
shows a bridge amplifier with a right-circle flexure hinge. To obtain the same amplification ratio, the bridge amplification mechanism can be made more compact than the lever-type mechanism, but its analytical model is more complicated. In addition, the lateral stiffness of the bridge-type mechanism is lower than the lever-type. Therefore, guiding mechanisms are always used to overcome this disadvantage.
Researchers have conducted many studies on the performance evaluation of the bridge amplifier and its derived types. For example, Lobontiu et al. [56
] reviewed the literature and gave an analytical model of the bridge amplifier. Choi et al. [64
] designed an amplifier with double-amplification mechanisms and two piezoelectric actuators to overcome the output force deterioration problem (see Figure 5
a). With a similar structure, Kim et al. [65
] integrated the compound guiding mechanism to form the self-guided bridge amplifier. Xu et al. [54
] designed a bridge amplifier with compound design (see Figure 5
b) to overcome the low lateral stiffness problem of the original bridge amplifier and derived the mathematical model by geometric relations and elastic analysis. Lee et al. [66
] proposed a spatial compound bridge amplifier (Figure 5
c) to reduce the height of a lifting stage. Zhu et al. [67
] used the Z-shaped flexure hinges in the design of a half-bridge amplifier. Zhang et al. [68
] designed two-level and three-level bridge amplifiers to obtain a larger amplification ratio, and the expression of the amplification ratio was also derived. Li et al. [70
] presented a derivation of empirical compliance equations of the rectangular flexure hinge, which was verified by constructing a bridge amplifier. More recently, Dong et al. [71
] proposed the design of a highly efficient bridge-type mechanism based on negative stiffness. Chen et al. [72
] reported a three-dimensional bridge-type mechanism, which provides a large amplification ratio of 41.
3.3. Hybrid-Type Amplifier
In order to have a better utility of space and linearity of output motion, some researchers used the lever and bridge amplifier together in one design. In the literature, Yao et al. [73
] presented an amplifier that is composed of two serially-jointed parallelogram four-bar linkages (Figure 6
). The input end is located on one bar. The first level of amplification is carried by a lever mechanism, and then, the second level of amplification is realized by the two parallelogram four-bar linkages, which can be considered as a compound half-bridge amplifier. Clark et al. [74
] designed a pure rotation stage with the use of a bridge amplifier and two three-level lever amplifiers. Zhang et al. [55
] and Tzou et al. [75
] both used two lever amplifiers in symmetry to obtain the amplified stroke, and then, a half-bridge amplifier was used to generate linear motion. Besides, Zhang and Xu [76
] used lever amplifiers to amplify the output of the bridge amplifier, so as to increase the workspace of a 3-PSS (prismatic-spherical-spherical) parallel flexure stage.
4. Design of a Multi-DOF Stage
In order to carry out delicate and complicated operations, the micro-/nano-positioning stage needs more degrees-of-freedom (DOF). In the literature, there are three main schemes to design a multi-DOF stage, i.e., serial scheme, parallel scheme and serial-parallel scheme. In this section, different scheme designs are introduced, and the recommendation is proposed as a reference to choose a specific scheme.
4.1. Serial Scheme Design
The serial scheme is the simplest method to form a multi-DOF stage, which is realized by connecting one stage’s fixed end to another stage’s output end in series. Benefiting from this feature, the serial stages can be used modularly, e.g., several 1-DOF stages can be composed as an XY, XYZ or large stroke 1-DOF stage. Moreover, the serial stage is easy to design as a stacked structure, which can reduce the planar size and increase the compactness. To conclude, the serial scheme is recommended for the designs that require high modularity or flexibility to suit different application scenarios.
In the literature, Xu [77
] introduced a dual-stage 1-DOF positioning system by serial connection of the VCM-driven and PEA-driven stages, which can provide a resolution of 500 nm and over a 10-mm stroke. Xue et al. [78
] designed an ESA-driven XYZ serial stage, which has a workspace of 25.2 × 20.4 × 58.5
. Lee et al. [79
] designed a serial XY stage with a stacked structure (Figure 7
), which has 50-nm resolution and an 80 × 80
workspace. Liu et al. [80
] used embedded structure to design a planar serial XY stage. It provides a resolution of 50 nm and a workspace of 41.6 × 42.9
. Pinskier et al. [81
] composed two modular 1-DOF stages in a stack to form an XY serial stage, which has a workspace of 39.1 × 42.1
However, as for a multi-DOF serial stage, the positioning error of each stage will be accumulated and expressed in the final output. On the other hand, since the loading of each level is different, it will cause different dynamic performances for each stage. Thus, a better control and feedback system should be applied to overcome these problems.
4.2. Parallel Scheme Design
The parallel mechanisms, which are implemented by the connection of joints (revolute (R), prismatic (P), cylinder (C), spherical (S) and universal (U)) and rigid linkages, have been concluded well in previous research [82
]. The related large-scale positioning stages have been widely used in industry such as multi-axis machining. Due to the properties such as no backlash and being frictionless, the compliant joint is an effective choice to replace the rigid joint, so as to construct a precision parallel stage. Therefore, the compliant parallel positioning stage has become a hot topic in recent years.
To develop a parallel stage, one method is connecting the output ends of different links together. It is a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system as its output motion is coupled. Another method is using decoupling mechanisms as connectors to connect the output ends of different stages. The decoupling mechanisms or decouplers are used to reduce the coupling effect or even isolate the output motion of different axes of the stage. Because of the decoupled output motion, the system can be treated as a combination of multiple single-input single-output (SISO) systems. Some typical decouplers have been used in recent research (see Figure 8
), such as parallelogram flexure (PF), compound parallelogram flexure (CPF) and the Roberts mechanism (RM) [83
In comparison with the serial scheme, the parallel scheme can provide larger stiffness, faster response, no accumulated error and identical dynamic performance on each axis by applying a symmetrical design. This scheme is commonly used in applications that require high dynamic performance.
Recent research about parallel stage is mostly focused on three kinds of stage, i.e., XY stage, XY
stage and XYZ stage, due to their high versatility. In addition, other designs are also presented for some certain applications, e.g., Hao and He [84
] designed a
stage for the implementation of a tip-tilt-piston motion. Since there are many related research works about the XY and XY
stage in the literature, some of the fabricated stages are listed in Table 1
and Table 2
. Due to the difficulty of manufacturing, there are only a few fabricated XYZ stages. Thus, Table 3
shows both fabricated prototypes and concept designs of XYZ stages.
4.3. Serial-Parallel Scheme Design
Both serial and parallel schemes have their own advantages and disadvantages. In order to reduce the design difficulty and to obtain a reliable performance, the serial-parallel scheme is a compromise choice. Generally, the serial-parallel scheme provides a higher stiffness than the serial scheme and offers a larger workspace than the parallel scheme [103
The serial-parallel scheme is normally adopted in the mechanical design, which needs three or more DOFs. In the literature, there are many research works about the serial-parallel stage using rigid mechanisms [105
]. However, there are only a few of research works that adopt the compliant mechanism. Tang et al. [107
] design an XYZ serial-parallel positioning stage with the use of two-axis flexure hinges. Cai et al. [108
] serially connected two complementary 3-DOF parallel stages to form a 6-DOF compliant stage (Figure 9
). The authors stated that this scheme has many benefits, e.g., simple structure, low manufacturing difficulty, low assembly error, high system stability and good dynamic performance.
5. Optimization Methods
Structural parameter design is also an important part of designing a compliant micro-/nano-positioning stage, because it governs the performance of the stage dominantly, e.g., stiffness, strength, deflection shape or decoupling performance. An optimal design can guarantee the stability and reliability of the structure and increase the concerned efficiency, e.g., space and material utilization.
To obtain a reliable result in optimization, objective functions should be well prepared. In the field of mechanical design, finite element analysis (FEA) and mathematical modeling are two major methods to evaluate the performance before the prototype fabrication. FEA can provide a reasonable result, and its accuracy mainly relies on the fineness of meshing. There are many widely-used FEA software packages, such as ANSYS, COMSOL and ABAQUS, which provide ease-of-use environments for the user, but the computational cost is high. On the other hand, although the mathematical model could be solved within a short time, the accuracy of the model affects the reliability of the results. Researchers have proposed various methods, where the compliance matrix method [109
] and pseudo-rigid-body model (PRBM) [112
] are two of the most-used methods for modeling the flexure hinges. With years of practice, the reliability of both of these has been well verified. Besides, the low computational cost is a major benefit for optimizing the complex structure.
In the field of structure optimization, there are three types of methodologies, namely dimension optimization, shape optimization and topology optimization. During the mechanism design, the dimension and shape optimization are normally performed at a later stage, while topology optimization is conducted at the very beginning. In this section, different optimization methods and processes are introduced.
5.1. Dimension and Shape Optimization
The dimension of the mechanisms affects its performance greatly. In order to select the best values of the dimensions to improve the potential of a mechanism, an optimization should be done to enhance the performance. After defining the optimization problem, e.g., optimization objectives and the constraints of performance and design parameters, optimization methods should be chosen to complete the process. According to recent research, the optimization methods can be categorized into non-heuristic and heuristic algorithms.
5.1.1. Non-Heuristic Algorithms
Non-heuristic algorithms include mathematical algorithms (e.g., gradient descent, Newton’s method) and statistical methods (e.g., response surface method, grey relational analysis). Researchers have applied the algorithms to solve the optimization problem of structure design. For instance, Kim et al. [65
] and Lee et al. [66
] used the sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method to maximize the dynamic performance of their designs. Lai et al. [88
] used the “fmincon” function, which is provided by MATLAB, to maximize the translational natural frequency of an XY stage. Dao et al. [60
] applied the response surface methodology (RSM) and entropy measurement technique, which are based on the Taguchi method and grey relational analysis, to maximize both the displacement and first natural frequency of an XY parallel stage. Jiang et al. [117
] defined the input coupling degree (ICD) to evaluate the decoupling performance of an XY parallel stage first, and then used the “fmincon” function to minimize the ICD.
5.1.2. Heuristic Algorithm
In order to further improve the performance, more freedom of design is required. Therefore, more design parameters should be tuned to fulfill the demand. As the number of design parameters increases, it is challenging work for the conventional optimization methods to obtain an optimal result. The reason lies in that the objective function may not be a convex function, and the local extremum may not be the global extremum. On the other hand, the screening method is also unpractical because of the large search space.
To solve this kind of optimization problem with an acceptable time and resource cost, heuristic algorithms become an alternative choice. In the literature, Xu et al. [59
] used particle swarm optimization (PSO) to maximize the frequency of the designed stages. Lin et al. [121
] and Liu et al. [122
] applied the genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize their designs. In addition, Tian et al. [92
] solved the optimization problem by using both PSO and GA, and obtained two similar results. This indicates the reliability of the two methods.
5.2. Topology Optimization
At present, the designs of most compliant mechanisms are inspired by or referenced to existing rigid mechanisms, i.e., using a compliant component to replace the rigid component. Although the dimension and shape optimization can improve the performance of the compliant stage to a certain extent, the design already has limited the potential. To improve the performance from the root, researchers have used topology optimization to design new compliant mechanisms starting from the end of the 20th Century [123
]. The main idea of topology optimization is to achieve the best distribution and least usage of material. Therefore, unlike the frequency maximization objective in dimension and shape optimization, the objective of topology optimization is more flexible. Researchers can design various objectives according to their requirements.
Recent topology optimization research woks about compliant mechanisms have been mostly concentrated on the improvement of optimization methods. For instance, Lee et al. [125
] proposed the strain-based solid isotropic microstructure with penalty (SIMP) method to reduce the localized high strain in the flexure hinge. Gaynor et al. [126
] used the peak function method and the multivariate SIMP method to perform multiple material topology optimization. Huang et al. [127
] proposed bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (bi-directional ESO (BESO)) to implement the structure optimization with desired stiffness. Wang et al. [128
] used the level set method to track the motion of the actuator and the independent point-wise density interpolation (iPDI) method to optimize the structure, so as to realize the optimization of both actuating position and structure. De Leon et al. [129
] added the stress constraint in the optimization to avoid the one-node-connected hinge problem. In addition, Yoo et al. [130
] used modified ant colony optimization (MACO) to improve the computational efficiency of SIMP.
Researchers have also used novel tools to design positioning stages. In the literature, Lum et al. [131
] analyzed and optimized the compliant joints and then constructed an XY
parallel stage by using the optimal results (see Figure 10
a). Bharanidaran et al. [132
] designed a stroke amplifier by topology optimization (Figure 10
b), which obtained a half-bridge amplifier. This research demonstrated the reasonableness of bridge type amplifiers. Jin et al. [133
] directly defined the design domain of XY and XY
parallel stages (Figure 10
c,d) and then fabricated and tested the prototypes with optimal results.
6. Further Discussion
From the literature review, we can find that the performance of compliant mechanisms is commonly evaluated by their static and dynamic properties. For a compliant positioning stage, its static performance is mainly indicated by its workspace. However, a larger workspace means larger elastic deformation of the mechanism. Therefore, larger elastic force will be generated. As for the dynamic performance, it is mainly indicated by the natural frequency, which has a positive correlation with the mechanism’s stiffness. However, retaining the same deformation, a higher stiffness mechanism means larger elastic force. Hence, both static and dynamic performances highlight the importance and necessity of a larger actuating force. More recently, constant-force or statically-balanced compliant mechanisms have been investigated [134
]. This emerges as a promising research topic of actuation technology for various manipulation tasks [136
For a positioning stage with more than three DOFs, the designed components are usually not planar. On the other hand, the 2D topology optimization always gives the integrated and irregular structure. If topology optimization is applied to 3D solid model design, the optimization result can be more complex. However, the conventional manufacturing methods, e.g., computer numerical control (CNC) lathe machining and wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM), cannot fabricate such complex structures. Therefore, a complex structure needs to be partitioned into several components for manufacturing and then assembling together by screws. Nevertheless, the tolerance of the screw holes further enlarges the effect of manufacturing tolerance. To manufacture complex structure as an integral object with high precision, additive manufacturing (AM) has the greatest potential, e.g., selective laser sintering (SLS), selective laser melting (SLM), direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) and laser engineered net shaping (LENS) [137
This paper has reviewed the recent designs of compliant micro-/nano-positioning stages in consideration of major processes and components in the design flow. With this concept, distinctive design issues are introduced and compared. Moreover, the problems and challenges of the design are concluded and discussed. As a reference, Figure 11
gives the design flow for designing a compliant micro-/nano-positioning stage.
According to the flowchart, the design is oriented by the application. Thus, researchers should first choose the appropriate actuator for the stage according to the specific performance requirement. Once the actuator is selected, the design method needs to be considered, i.e., topology optimization or conventional design approach. For those who choose topology optimization to design the stage, the following step is the optimization; whereas, for those who follow the conventional design way, the next step is the mechanical design, e.g., stroke amplifier or decoupler, which depends on the design requirement and the chosen connecting scheme. Moreover, if an improved performance is desired, the dimension or shape optimization can be introduced as an extra step after the mechanical design. The processes of dimension/shape and topology optimization are similar, i.e., they need a clearly-defined optimization problem including the objectives and constraints, and then, the optimization can be performed by specific optimization algorithm. After the verification by the analytical model or FEA, the design process can be finished. Afterwards, prototype fabrication can be conducted for experimental investigation and application testing. With the advancement of related technologies, more and more micro-/nano-positioning stages will be devised in both academia and industry for pertinent applications.