Next Article in Journal
Candida albicans Shed Msb2 and Host Mucins Affect the Candidacidal Activity of Salivary Hst 5
Next Article in Special Issue
Viral Interactions with PDZ Domain-Containing Proteins—An Oncogenic Trait?
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Contributions of the Complement Anaphylotoxin Receptors C5aR1 and C5aR2 to the Early Innate Immune Response against Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epstein-Barr Virus Sequence Variation—Biology and Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 4
Issue 4
10.3390/pathogens4040739
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Identification of Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma Cells

by
Chris Traylen
1,†,
Sharada Ramasubramanyan
1,†,
Jianmin Zuo
2,
Martin Rowe
2,
Rajaei Almohammad
1,
Kate Heesom
4,
Steve M. M. Sweet
3,
David A. Matthews
4 and
Alison J. Sinclair
1,*
1
School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
2
School of Cancer Sciences and Centre for Human Virology, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
3
Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
4
School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Medical Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2015, 4(4), 739-751; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4040739
Submission received: 7 July 2015 / Revised: 20 October 2015 / Accepted: 23 October 2015 / Published: 29 October 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infection and Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The working model to describe the mechanisms used to replicate the cancer-associated virus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is partly derived from comparisons with other members of the Herpes virus family. Many genes within the EBV genome are homologous across the herpes virus family. Published transcriptome data for the EBV genome during its lytic replication cycle show extensive transcription, but the identification of the proteins is limited. We have taken a global proteomics approach to identify viral proteins that are expressed during the EBV lytic replication cycle. We combined an enrichment method to isolate cells undergoing EBV lytic replication with SILAC-labeling coupled to mass-spectrometry and identified viral and host proteins expressed during the EBV lytic replication cycle. Amongst the most frequently identified viral proteins are two components of the DNA replication machinery, the single strand DNA binding protein BALF2, DNA polymerase accessory protein BMRF1 and both subunits of the viral ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase enzyme (BORF2 and BaRF1). An additional 42 EBV lytic cycle proteins were also detected. This provides proteomic identification for many EBV lytic replication cycle proteins and also identifies post-translational modifications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with diverse cancers including Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, NK/T lymphomas, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric cancer [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. During the ~50-years since the identification of the virus [10] and the ~30 years since the genome sequence of the first isolate was published [11], there has been a strong focus on research into the viral genes commonly expressed in tumors, which has enabled us to obtain a good understanding of the ability of EBV to transform cells and so establish viral latency.
EBV within tumor cells undergoes lytic cycle replication only rarely and ~90% of EBV genes are not commonly expressed in tumors. However, these are transcribed following the disruption of latency as cells enter the EBV lytic replication cycle. Sensitive transcriptome analysis in Burkitt’s lymphoma cells that have been stimulated to initiate the EBV lytic replication cycle [12,13], together with array-based strategies [14,15] and earlier mapping approaches (reviewed in [16]), suggests that the entire genome complement is expressed once EBV lytic replication cycle is activated.
The contribution of several EBV lytic cycle genes has been subject to genetic evaluation. This identified BZLF1, BRLF1 [17], BSLF2 + BMLF1 [18] and BMRF1 [19] as essential for regulating viral gene expression during viral lytic replication and others (BFLF1, BFLF2, BFRF1, BGRF1 and BDRF1) contribute to encapsulating the viral genome [20,21,22]. In contrast, BGLF4 contributes to the efficiency of viral replication [23,24,25,26] and some viral genes such as BLLF1 and BNRF1 are not required to generate virus but rather contribute to the subsequent infection of cells or allow efficient entry and genome release [27,28,29]. Finally, some viral genes contribute to immune evasion of infected cells, e.g., BNLF2a [30]. The contributions that many other EBV lytic replication cycle genes make to the EBV lytic replication cycle are inferred through their homology with the alpha herpesvirus family [1]. Several of these proteins have been detected by immunofluorescence during viral replication (e.g., [31]).
Despite three studies using proteomics approaches [32,33,34], not all EBV lytic cycle genes have been previously identified and many have not been independently verified. Here, we used an engineered Burkitt’s lymphoma cell system to enrich for cells undergoing EBV lytic replication and coupled this with SILAC-proteomics to develop a route to detect EBV proteins in Akata cells undergoing EBV lytic replication. This allowed us to identify a total of 44 EBV proteins and post-translational modifications of several viral proteins.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation of Proteins in Cells Undergoing EBV Lytic Cycle

Cells from a Burkitt’s lymphoma which harbor EBV in type I latency had previously been engineered to co-express Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), Nerve Growth Factor receptor (NGFR) and Zta (BZLF1) from an inducible bi-directional promoter (Akata-Zta). A cell line in which the Zta coding sequence is orientated in the non-coding direction acts as a control [35,36]. Proteins within the Akata control and Akata Zta cells were differentially metabolically labeled with amino acids consisting of stable isotopes. Following activation of the expression cassette using doxycycline, cells that had successfully been induced were isolated by their affinity for anti-NGFR coated magnetic beads. Analysis of GFP expression in the enriched cell population revealed a purity of between 57% and 62% (Figure 1).
Pathogens 04 00739 g001 1024
Figure 1. Enrichment of Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL) cells induced to enter Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic replication cycle. (a) Co-induction of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), Nerve Growth factor receptor (NGFR) and Zta (or not for control cells) and procedure to induce and enrich cells, together with the % enrichment (GFP positivity) is shown; (b) Total protein extracts were prepared, fractionated on SDS-PAGE and stained.
Figure 1. Enrichment of Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL) cells induced to enter Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic replication cycle. (a) Co-induction of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), Nerve Growth factor receptor (NGFR) and Zta (or not for control cells) and procedure to induce and enrich cells, together with the % enrichment (GFP positivity) is shown; (b) Total protein extracts were prepared, fractionated on SDS-PAGE and stained.
Pathogens 04 00739 g001

2.2. Identification of Proteins in Cells Undergoing EBV Lytic Cycle

The proteins from Akata-control and Akata-Zta were mixed in equal amounts and the relative abundance of cellular and viral proteins was analyzed by quantitative mass spectrometry (MS). Global analysis of the differences in abundance detected through the differential SILAC labeling and the difference in abundance of individual proteins determined by Western blot analysis revealed a modest overall reduction in the abundance of cellular proteins (between 1.2 and 2-fold) during EBV lytic cycle (Figure 2). Viral proteins were identified only in the Zta-expressing cells.
Pathogens 04 00739 g002 1024
Figure 2. Stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL) cells during EBV lytic cycle. Total protein extracts were prepared from the enriched BL cells. MS analysis was undertaken. (a) The change in abundance of proteins with SILAC-information from both control and Zta expressing cells is shown; (b) The frequency distribution of the difference in protein abundance is shown as a Gaussian plot; (c) Total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blots were probed with anti-HSP90 and beta actin antibodies.
Figure 2. Stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL) cells during EBV lytic cycle. Total protein extracts were prepared from the enriched BL cells. MS analysis was undertaken. (a) The change in abundance of proteins with SILAC-information from both control and Zta expressing cells is shown; (b) The frequency distribution of the difference in protein abundance is shown as a Gaussian plot; (c) Total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blots were probed with anti-HSP90 and beta actin antibodies.
Pathogens 04 00739 g002

2.3. Identification of EBV Proteins

To identify EBV proteins in cells undergoing lytic replication, we considered the peptides that match with an EBV protein. The Uniprot databases which include proteins from three viral genomes HHV4 (B95-8 UP000007640; AG876 UP000007639; and GD1 UP000007641). The identity of each of the 169 peptides that correspond to an EBV protein with a Posterior Error Probability (PEP) score of less than 1.0 × 10−3 are provided in Table S1. These were all up regulated ≥8.6 fold during lytic cycle, with the majority being undetectable in latency. This identified peptides corresponding to 33 EBV proteins (Table 1). In addition, a custom made database of the Akata EBV proteome was generated and searched to ensure that polymorphic regions were not overlooked. However, this revealed no additional protein identifications. In order to increase the sensitivity of EBV protein detection in our dataset, we carried out a further MaxQuant search against the EBV proteome (UniProt), omitting human sequences [37]. This identified an additional 11 EBV proteins, also shown in Table 1 (highlighted). The peptides associated with this search are listed in Table S2.
Table
Table 1. EBV proteins identified by MS analysis.
Table 1. EBV proteins identified by MS analysis.
GeneFunction
BALF2Major DNA-binding protein
BALF4Envelope glycoprotein B
BALF5DNA polymerase catalytic subunit
BaRF1Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase small chain
BBLF2-BBLF3primase protein
BBLF4DNA replication helicase
BBRF2Virion egress protein UL7 homolog
BcLF1Major capsid protein
BDLF1Triplex capsid protein VP23 homolog
BFLF1Packaging protein UL32 homolog
BFLF2Virion egress protein
BFRF1Virion egress protein UL34 homolog
BFRF3Capsid protein VP26
BGLF2Capsid-binding protein
BGLF4Serine/threonine-protein kinase
BGLF5Shutoff alkaline exonuclease
BHRF1Apoptosis regulator
BKRF3Uracil-DNA glycosylase
BLLF3Deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase
BLRF2Tegument protein
BSLF2-BMLF1mRNA export factor ICP27 homolog
BMRF1DNA polymerase processivity factor
BNRF1Major tegument protein
BORF2Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase large subunit
BPLF1Deneddylase
BRRF1Transcriptional activator
BRRF2Tegument protein
BSRF1Tegument protein UL51 homolog
BTRF1Uncharacterized protein BTRF1
BVRF2Capsid scaffolding protein
BdRF1
BXLF1Thymidine kinase
BZLF1 *Trans-activator protein
BDLF3pg85
BLLF1gp350
BMRF2Protein BMRF2
BORF1Triplex capsid protein
BPLF1deneddylase
BRLF1Replication and transcription factor
BRRF2tegument protein
BSLF1DNA primase
gHgH
gLgL
LF1LF1
* BZLF1 expression is driven by the doxycycline induced expression vector in these cells so detection cannot be ascribed to the endogenous protein. Yellow highlight represents proteins only identified in the EBV-specific search.
Table
Table 2. Post-translational modifications of EBV proteins identified by MS analysis.
Table 2. Post-translational modifications of EBV proteins identified by MS analysis.
Gene NameModificationpep_seqaa of EBV ProteinResidue of Modification
BALF5N terminal acetylation[ac]SGGLFYNPFLRPNK2–152
BLLF3N terminal acetylation[ac]MEACPHIR9–169
BLRF2PhosphorylationGQPS[ph]PGEGTRPR124–135127
BMRF12 PhosphorylationHTVS[ph]PSPS[ph]PPPPPR330–343333 and 337
BMRF2N terminal acetylation[ac]METTQTLR1–81
BORF1PhosphorylationRLNIS[ph]R26–3130
BORF2N terminal acetylation[ac]ATTSHVEHELLSK2–142
BXLF1PhosphorylationTQAAVTSNTGNS[ph]PGSR86–10197
BZLF1N terminal acetylation[ac]MMDPNSTSEDVK1–121
None of the EBV proteins are associated with EBV latency; all originate from genes with a characteristic lytic replication cycle pattern of expression [16]. One of the 44 proteins identified, BZLF1, could be derived from either the expression vector or the endogenous virus so it should not be considered as proof of identity of the endogenous protein. We confirm expression of one of these proteins, BMRF1, by Western blot (Figure 3A) and we show which gene products are uniquely identified here and which provides confirmation of proteins previously identified in other reports (Figure 3B).
Pathogens 04 00739 g003 1024
Figure 3. SILAC MS analysis of proteins EBV proteins detected in Akata cells during lytic cycle. (A) Akata control and Akata Zta cells were induced with doxycycline for 24 h and total protein extracts prepared. Western blot analysis of BMRF1, Zta and beta actin abundance is show; (B) The EBV proteins identified are shown in relation to previously published studies. BZLF1 is marked*, its expression is driven by the doxycycline induced expression vector in these cells so detection cannot be ascribed to the endogenous protein.
Figure 3. SILAC MS analysis of proteins EBV proteins detected in Akata cells during lytic cycle. (A) Akata control and Akata Zta cells were induced with doxycycline for 24 h and total protein extracts prepared. Western blot analysis of BMRF1, Zta and beta actin abundance is show; (B) The EBV proteins identified are shown in relation to previously published studies. BZLF1 is marked*, its expression is driven by the doxycycline induced expression vector in these cells so detection cannot be ascribed to the endogenous protein.
Pathogens 04 00739 g003

2.4. Identification of Post-Translational Modifications of EBV Proteins

We searched for potential post-translational modifications of EBV proteins using MASCOT to search a minimal EBV database. All identifications were required to be from medium-labeled peptides, i.e., present after EBV induction. The same phosphorylation and N-terminal acetylation modifications were also identified in a MaxQuant search of the EBV database. Those phospho-serine and amino-terminal acetylation modifications corresponding to proteins identified in Table 1 are shown in Table 2, with peptide identification evidence provided in Table S3. This identified that five lytic EBV proteins sustain amino-terminal acetylation; BZLF1 (Zta), BMRF2, BLLF3, BALF5, and BORF2. In addition EBV peptides corresponding to serine phosphorylation were identified for BMRF1, BLRF2, BORF1 and BXLF1.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Cell Culture

Akata-Zta and Akata control cells [36] were cultured in RPMI–SILAC labeled RPMI containing 13C6-arginine and 4,4,5,5-D4-lysine (R6K4) (medium) and RPMI R0K0 (light) respectively (Dundee Cell products). Each was supplemented with 15% (v/v) dialyzed FBS and 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were maintained between 3 and 10 × 105 cells/mL and were cultured in SILAC-medium for 16 population doublings. Doxycycline (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 500 ng/mL and cells incubated for a further 24 h. Successfully induced cells were enriched using anti-NGFR antibodies coupled to paramagnetic beads as described [36].

3.2. FACS Analysis

Live cells were analyzed using a multi-parameter fluorescent activated cell analysis (FACs) (Facs Canto-Beckton Dickinson). GFP positive cells were identified using BD FACSDiva™ Software (Beckton Dickinson).

3.3. Western Blot Analysis

An equivalent number of cells were lysed using SDS-PAGE sample buffer at a final concentration of 1.0 × 104 cells/μL. Extracts from 1.0 × 105 cells were fractionated on SDS-PAGE. The total protein complement was detected following staining with Simply Blue stain or transferred to nitrocellulose. Proteins were identified using the following primary antibodies, beta actin (A2066, SIGMA), HSP90 (AC88 ab13492, ABCAM), Zta [38] and BMRF1 (8F92, ab30541, ABCAM). This was followed by incubation with species-specific infra-red labeled secondary antibodies (LiCor). The presence and relative abundance of proteins was determined using an Odyssey Fc Imager and Odyssey Image Studio (Licor).

3.4. Mass Spectrometry Collection and Analysis

Extracts from Zta expressing and not expressing cells were mixed and fractionated on SDS-PAGE (Novex). The lane was cut into six slices and each slice was subjected to in-gel digestion with a DigestPro MSi automatic digestion system (Intavis Bioanalytical Instruments) as described in [39]. The resulting peptides were fractionated using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 nano HPLC system coupled to an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). In brief, peptides in 1% (v/v) formic acid were injected onto an Acclaim PepMap C18 nano-trap column (Dionex). After washing with 0.5% (v/v) acetonitrile 0.1% (v/v) formic acid, peptides were resolved on a 250 mm × 75 μm Acclaim PepMap C18 reverse phase analytical column (Dionex) over a 150 min organic gradient, using 7 gradient segments (1%–6% solvent B over 1 min, 6%–15% B over 58 min, 15%–32% B over 58 min, 32%–40% B over 3 min, 40%–90% B over 1 min, held at 90% B for 6 min and then reduced to 1% B over 1 min) with a flow rate of 300 nL∙min−1. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid and Solvent B was aqueous 80% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. Peptides were ionized by nano-electrospray ionization at 2.3 kV using a stainless steel emitter with an internal diameter of 30 μm (Thermo Scientific) and a capillary temperature of 250 °C. Tandem mass spectra were acquired using an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer controlled by Xcalibur v2.1 software [40] and operated in data-dependent acquisition mode. The Orbitrap was set to analyze the survey scans at 60,000 resolution (at m/z 400) in the mass range m/z 300–2000 and the top six multiply charged ions in each duty cycle selected for MS/MS in the LTQ linear ion trap. Charge state filtering, where unassigned precursor ions were not selected for fragmentation, and dynamic exclusion (repeat count, 1; repeat duration, 30 s; exclusion list size, 500) were used. Fragmentation conditions in the LTQ were as follows: normalized collision energy, 40%; activation q, 0.25; activation time 10 ms; and minimum ion selection intensity, 500 counts. Data were acquired using the Xcalibar v2.1 software. The raw data files were processed and quantified using MaxQuant as described in [39] and searched against standard human proteome and EBV protein lists from UNIPROT and a translation of the Akata EBV genome. A search was also carried out against the EBV UniProt proteins plus contaminants, with the human sequences omitted [37]. Peptide precursor mass tolerance was set at 10 ppm, and MS/MS tolerance was set at 0.8 Da. Search criteria included carbamidomethylation of cysteine (+57.0214) as a fixed modification and oxidation of methionine (+15.9949) and appropriate SILAC labels as variable modifications.
Searches were performed with full tryptic digestion and a maximum of two missed cleavages was allowed. The reverse database search option was enabled and all peptide data was filtered to satisfy false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%.
A database search using Mascot was carried out against a database containing 282 EBV protein sequences from UniProt. The search used the following parameters: 10 ppm precursor mass tolerance; 0.6 Da fragment ion mass tolerance; fixed modification: carbamidomethylation (C); variable modifications: Protein N-terminus acetylation, methionine oxidation, phosphorylation (STY), 2H(4) K, 13C(6) R.
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium [1] via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002461 [41].

4. Conclusions

Two previous studies compared the proteomes in BL and primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cells during EBV lytic cycle with the proteomes of cells during latency or to those that are refractory to entering EBV lytic cycle [33,34]. The previous studies used the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate [34] and/or a combination of the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate to induce EBV to enter its lytic replication cycle. Here, we used a different method to initiate EBV lytic cycle gene expression, the ectopic expression of Zta protein. We previously demonstrated that this is sufficient to promote expression of several EBV lytic cycle genes leading to replication of the EBV genome [36]. Sensitive transcriptome analysis of EBV identified highly abundant mRNAs [12,14,33]. While some of the proteins encoded by these are readily detected in the lytic cells (e.g., BMRF1, BMLF1 and BHRF1), others are not detected in any study (e.g., BALF1). This highlights one of the limitations of interpreting a global proteomics study; some proteins do not generate peptides that can be unambiguously identified. Whether EBV completes the lytic cycle in response to any of these stimuli yet protein expression is too low to be detected by mass spectrometry, or whether the lytic cycles are aborted prior to full viral gene expression and release of infectious virus is unknown. In addition to the analysis of viral proteins within cells, proteins present in purified EBV virions have also been detected using proteomics [32].
A comparison of our data with these three datasets revealed that we detected 28 EBV proteins that had been identified in two or more previous studies. We therefore provide further support for the identification of these proteins. Importantly, our analysis detected 12 viral proteins that were only identified in one previous study, providing important independent evidence of their detection. In addition, we provide evidence for the first detection of three viral proteins by mass spectrometry. The first is BBRF2, which is a homologue of the HSV1 virion egress protein UL7. Clues as to its function arise from the recent demonstration that UL7 plays a role in linking tegument proteins of HSV1 to membranes [42]. The second protein is BFLF1. Interestingly, BFLF1 is a homologue of the HSV1 UL32 gene, which plays a role in HSV1 encapsidation [43] which supports the potential involvement of BFLF1 protein in cleavage and packaging of the viral genome [21]. The third, BSLF1, encodes the DNA primase that is required for genome lytic replication [44,45]. In addition, we detected Zta protein (BZLF1), although it is not possible to distinguish whether this originates from the endogenous genome or the expression vector.
Further analysis of the data identified evidence for novel post-translational modifications of nine EBV proteins. Amino-terminal acetylation events were identified for Zta, BLLF3, BALF5, BMRF2 and BORF2. For BALF5 and BORF2 amino terminal processing had occurred and the acetylation is present on the second residue, for the remainder it is present on the initiator methionine. Neither the acetylation nor the amino terminal processing had been described previously. A large sub-set of cellular proteins also sustain the amino terminal acetylation, the function is enigmatic, and roles in protein–protein interaction, sub-cellular targeting and degradation have all been postulated [46]. In addition to this, EBV peptides corresponding to serine phosphorylation of BMRF1, BLRF2, BORF1 and BXLF1 were identified. Of these, BMRF1 is known to be phosphorylated at residue 337 [47], in addition to residues 344, 349 and 355. We provide evidence for a further site of phosphorylation at serine 333. In addition, this is the first report that BLRF2, BORF2 and BXLF1 sustain serine phosphorylation.
In summary, the definitive identification of 44 EBV proteins in BL cells undergoing EBV replication and the identification of novel post-translational modifications of nine of these lytic cycle proteins increase the knowledge base of EBV lytic replication and may highlight different targets for future strategies to enable the development of therapeutic interventions to manipulate EBV replication.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/4/3/739/s1.

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by grants from the Medical Research Council (MR/J001708/1 to AJS and MR, G0901755 to MR) and from the BBSRC (BB/L018438/1 to DAM).

Author Contributions

Martin Rowe and Jianmin Zuo established the cell lines used in the study. Chris Traylen, Sharada Ramasubramanyan, Rajaei Almohammad undertook SILAC labeling, cell purification and mass spec analysis. Kate Heesom, David A. Matthews, Steve M. M. Sweet, Chris Traylen and Alison J. Sinclair analyzed data. Alison J. Sinclair prepared the report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Longnecker, R.; Kieff, E.; Cohen, J.I. Epstein-barr virus/replication and Epstein-Barr virus. In Fields Virology, 6th ed.; Lippencott, Williams, Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rowe, M.; Kelly, G.L.; Bell, A.I.; Rickinson, A.B. Burkitt’s lymphoma: The rosetta stone deciphering Epstein-Barr virus biology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2009, 19, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Strong, M.J.; Xu, G.; Coco, J.; Baribault, C.; Vinay, D.S.; Lacey, M.R.; Strong, A.L.; Lehman, T.A.; Seddon, M.B.; Lin, Z.; et al. Differences in gastric carcinoma microenvironment stratify according to EBV infection intensity: Implications for possible immune adjuvant therapy. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, X.Z.; Chen, H.; Castro, F.A.; Hu, J.K.; Brenner, H. Epstein-Barr virus infection and gastric cancer: A systematic review. Medicine 2015, 94, e792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shinozaki-Ushiku, A.; Kunita, A.; Fukayama, M. Update on Epstein-Barr virus and gastric cancer (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 1421–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kuppers, R. The biology of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vockerodt, M.; Cader, F.Z.; Shannon-Lowe, C.; Murray, P. Epstein-barr virus and the origin of Hodgkin lymphoma. Chin. J. Cancer 2014, 33, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lung, M.A. Acute effects of inhaled sulphur dioxide on pig nasal vascular and airway resistances. Acta physiol. Sinica 2014, 66, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Chan, A.T. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. ESMO 2010, 21, vii308–vii312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Epstein, M.A.; Achong, B.G.; Barr, Y.M. Virus particles in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt’s lymphoma. Lancet 1964, 1, 702–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baer, R.; Bankier, A.T.; Biggin, M.D.; Deninger, P.D.; Farrell, P.J.; Gibson, T.J.; Hatfull, G.; Hudson, G.S.; Satchwell, S.C.; Seguin, C.; et al. DNA sequence and expression of the B95-8 Epstein-Barr virus genome. Nature 1984, 310, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. O’Grady, T.; Cao, S.; Strong, M.J.; Concha, M.; Wang, X.; Splinter Bondurant, S.; Adams, M.; Baddoo, M.; Srivastav, S.K.; Lin, Z.; et al. Global bidirectional transcription of the Epstein-Barr virus genome during reactivation. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 1604–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Concha, M.; Wang, X.; Cao, S.; Baddoo, M.; Fewell, C.; Lin, Z.; Hulme, W.; Hedges, D.; McBride, J.; Flemington, E.K. Identification of new viral genes and transcript isoforms during Epstein-Barr virus reactivation using RNA-Seq. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 1458–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tierney, R.J.; Shannon-Lowe, C.D.; Fitzsimmons, L.; Bell, A.I.; Rowe, M. Unexpected patterns of Epstein-Barr virus transcription revealed by a high throughput PCR array for absolute quantification of viral mrna. Virology 2015, 474, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kurokawa, M.; Ghosh, S.K.; Ramos, J.C.; Mian, A.M.; Toomey, N.L.; Cabral, L.; Whitby, D.; Barber, G.N.; Dittmer, D.P.; Harrington, W.J., Jr. Azidothymidine inhibits nf-kappab and induces Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in Burkitt lymphoma. Blood 2005, 106, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Farrell, P.J. Epstein-barr virus genome. In Epstein-Barr Virus; Robertson, E.S., Ed.; Caister: Wymondham, UK, 2005; pp. 263–288. [Google Scholar]
  17. Feederle, R.; Kost, M.; Baumann, M.; Janz, A.; Drouet, E.; Hammerschmidt, W.; Delecluse, H.J. The Epstein-Barr virus lytic program is controlled by the co-operative functions of two transactivators. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 3080–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gruffat, H.; Batisse, J.; Pich, D.; Neuhierl, B.; Manet, E.; Hammerschmidt, W.; Sergeant, A. Epstein-Barr virus mrna export factor eb2 is essential for production of infectious virus. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 9635–9644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Neuhierl, B.; Delecluse, H.J. The Epstein-Barr virus bmrf1 gene is essential for lytic virus replication. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 5078–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Farina, A.; Feederle, R.; Raffa, S.; Gonnella, R.; Santarelli, R.; Frati, L.; Angeloni, A.; Torrisi, M.R.; Faggioni, A.; Delecluse, H.J. Bfrf1 of Epstein-Barr virus is essential for efficient primary viral envelopment and egress. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 3703–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Granato, M.; Feederle, R.; Farina, A.; Gonnella, R.; Santarelli, R.; Hub, B.; Faggioni, A.; Delecluse, H.J. Deletion of Epstein-Barr virus bflf2 leads to impaired viral DNA packaging and primary egress as well as to the production of defective viral particles. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 4042–4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pavlova, S.; Feederle, R.; Gartner, K.; Fuchs, W.; Granzow, H.; Delecluse, H.J. An Epstein-Barr virus mutant produces immunogenic defective particles devoid of viral DNA. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 2011–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Murata, T.; Isomura, H.; Yamashita, Y.; Toyama, S.; Sato, Y.; Nakayama, S.; Kudoh, A.; Iwahori, S.; Kanda, T.; Tsurumi, T. Efficient production of infectious viruses requires enzymatic activity of Epstein-Barr virus protein kinase. Virology 2009, 389, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. El-Guindy, A.; Lopez-Giraldez, F.; Delecluse, H.J.; McKenzie, J.; Miller, G. A locus encompassing the Epstein-Barr virus bglf4 kinase regulates expression of genes encoding viral structural proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Feederle, R.; Bannert, H.; Lips, H.; Muller-Lantzsch, N.; Delecluse, H.J. The Epstein-Barr virus alkaline exonuclease bglf5 serves pleiotropic functions in virus replication. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 4952–4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Feederle, R.; Mehl-Lautscham, A.M.; Bannert, H.; Delecluse, H.J. The Epstein-Barr virus protein kinase bglf4 and the exonuclease bglf5 have opposite effects on the regulation of viral protein production. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 10877–10891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Janz, A.; Oezel, M.; Kurzeder, C.; Mautner, J.; Pich, D.; Kost, M.; Hammerschmidt, W.; Delecluse, H.J. Infectious Epstein-Barr virus lacking major glycoprotein bllf1 (gp350/220) demonstrates the existence of additional viral ligands. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 10142–10152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feederle, R.; Neuhierl, B.; Baldwin, G.; Bannert, H.; Hub, B.; Mautner, J.; Behrends, U.; Delecluse, H.J. Epstein-Barr virus bnrf1 protein allows efficient transfer from the endosomal compartment to the nucleus of primary B lymphocytes. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 9435–9443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Neuhierl, B.; Feederle, R.; Adhikary, D.; Hub, B.; Geletneky, K.; Mautner, J.; Delecluse, H.J. Primary B-cell infection with a deltabalf4 Epstein-Barr virus comes to a halt in the endosomal compartment yet still elicits a potent cd4-positive cytotoxic T-cell response. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 4616–4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Croft, N.P.; Shannon-Lowe, C.; Bell, A.I.; Horst, D.; Kremmer, E.; Ressing, M.E.; Wiertz, E.J.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Rowe, M.; Rickinson, A.B.; et al. Stage-specific inhibition of mhc class i presentation by the Epstein-Barr virus bnlf2a protein during virus lytic cycle. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sato, Y.; Tsurumi, T. Genome guardian p53 and viral infections. Rev. Med. Virol. 2013, 23, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Johannsen, E.; Luftig, M.; Chase, M.R.; Weicksel, S.; Cahir-McFarland, E.; Illanes, D.; Sarracino, D.; Kieff, E. Proteins of purified Epstein-Barr virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 16286–16291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dresang, L.R.; Teuton, J.R.; Feng, H.; Jacobs, J.M.; Camp, D.G., 2nd; Purvine, S.O.; Gritsenko, M.A.; Li, Z.; Smith, R.D.; Sugden, B.; et al. Coupled transcriptome and proteome analysis of human lymphotropic tumor viruses: Insights on the detection and discovery of viral genes. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Koganti, S.; Clark, C.; Zhi, J.; Li, X.; Chen, E.I.; Chakrabortty, S.; Hill, E.R.; Bhaduri-McIntosh, S. Cellular stat3 functions via pcbp2 to restrain ebv lytic activation in B lymphocytes. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 5002–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zuo, J.M.; Thomas, W.A.; Haigh, T.A.; Fitzsimmons, L.; Long, H.M.; Hislop, A.D.; Taylor, G.S.; Rowe, M. Epstein-barr virus evades cd4(+) t cell responses in lytic cycle through bzlf1-mediated downregulation of cd74 and the cooperation of vbcl-2. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramasubramanyan, S.; Osborn, K.; Al-Mohammad, R.; Naranjo Perez-Fernandez, I.B.; Zuo, J.; Balan, N.; Godfrey, A.; Patel, H.; Peters, G.; Rowe, M.; et al. Epstein-Barr virus transcription factor zta acts through distal regulatory elements to directly control cellular gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 3563–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Noble, W.S. Mass spectrometrists should search only for peptides they care about. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Young, L.S.; Lau, R.; Rowe, M.; Niedobitek, G.; Packham, G.; Shanahan, F.; Rowe, D.T.; Greenspan, D.; Greenspan, J.S.; Rickinson, A.B.; et al. Differentiation-associated expression of the Epstein-Barr virus bzlf1 transactivator protein in oral hairy leukoplakia. J. Virol. 1991, 65, 2868–2874. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Evans, V.C.; Barker, G.; Heesom, K.J.; Fan, J.; Bessant, C.; Matthews, D.A. De novo derivation of proteomes from transcriptomes for transcript and protein identification. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Thermo Scientific. Xcalibur Software v2.1. Available online: http://www.thermoscientific.com/content/tfs/en/product/xcalibur-software.html (accessed on 23 October 2015).
  41. Vizcaino, J.A.; Deutsch, E.W.; Wang, R.; Csordas, A.; Reisinger, F.; Rios, D.; Dianes, J.A.; Sun, Z.; Farrah, T.; Bandeira, N.; et al. Proteomexchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Roller, R.J.; Fetters, R. The herpes simplex virus 1 ul51 protein interacts with the ul7 protein and plays a role in its recruitment into the virion. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 3112–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lamberti, C.; Weller, S.K. The herpes simplex virus type 1 cleavage/packaging protein, ul32, is involved in efficient localization of capsids to replication compartments. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 2463–2473. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Fixman, E.D.; Hayward, G.S.; Hayward, S.D. Trans-acting requirements for replication of Epstein-Barr virus ori-lyt. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 5030–5039. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Fixman, E.D.; Hayward, G.S.; Hayward, S.D. Replication of Epstein-Barr virus orilyt: Lack of a dedicated virally encoded origin-binding protein and dependence on Zta in cotransfection assays. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 2998–3006. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Arnesen, T. Towards a functional understanding of protein N-terminal acetylation. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9, e1001074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yang, P.W.; Chang, S.S.; Tsai, C.H.; Chao, Y.H.; Chen, M.R. Effect of phosphorylation on the transactivation activity of Epstein-Barr virus bmrf1, a major target of the viral bglf4 kinase. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 884–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Traylen, C.; Ramasubramanyan, S.; Zuo, J.; Rowe, M.; Almohammad, R.; Heesom, K.; Sweet, S.M.M.; Matthews, D.A.; Sinclair, A.J. Identification of Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma Cells. Pathogens 2015, 4, 739-751. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4040739

AMA Style

Traylen C, Ramasubramanyan S, Zuo J, Rowe M, Almohammad R, Heesom K, Sweet SMM, Matthews DA, Sinclair AJ. Identification of Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma Cells. Pathogens. 2015; 4(4):739-751. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4040739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Traylen, Chris, Sharada Ramasubramanyan, Jianmin Zuo, Martin Rowe, Rajaei Almohammad, Kate Heesom, Steve M. M. Sweet, David A. Matthews, and Alison J. Sinclair. 2015. "Identification of Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma Cells" Pathogens 4, no. 4: 739-751. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4040739

APA Style

Traylen, C., Ramasubramanyan, S., Zuo, J., Rowe, M., Almohammad, R., Heesom, K., Sweet, S. M. M., Matthews, D. A., & Sinclair, A. J. (2015). Identification of Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Proteins in Burkitt’s Lymphoma Cells. Pathogens, 4(4), 739-751. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4040739

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop