Next Article in Journal
Epidural Catheter- and Port-Related Infections in Pain Medicine: A Cohort Study from a Chronic Pain Center with Long-Term Catheterization
Previous Article in Journal
Parasites as Modulators of Angiogenesis: Implications for Vascular Biology and Pathogenesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Clostridium tertium Infection Following Obstructed Obturator Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review

1
Department of Pharmacy, Jiangbei District of Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing 210048, China
2
Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Dachang Hospital, Nanjing 210048, China
3
Department of Pharmacy, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
4
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2026, 15(4), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15040348
Submission received: 9 January 2026 / Revised: 13 February 2026 / Accepted: 20 March 2026 / Published: 25 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)

Abstract

Clostridium tertium is an emerging opportunistic pathogen typically associated with immunocompromised hosts, yet it can also cause serious infections in non-neutropenic individuals. We present a case of postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia caused by C. tertium in a non-neutropenic 75-year-old woman following emergency obturator hernia repair. Diagnosis was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and successful treatment was achieved with piperacillin–tazobactam combined with levornidazole alongside surgical source control. A review of 128 cumulative cases (including ours) revealed two distinct patterns: bacteremia in severely neutropenic patients versus a broader spectrum of localized and bloodstream infections in non-neutropenic hosts, often linked to intestinal barrier disruption. Mortality was largely driven by underlying comorbidities and polymicrobial sepsis. These findings indicate that C. tertium infection should be considered in non-neutropenic patients with postoperative or gastrointestinal barrier-disruptive infections, especially when there is a poor response to initial empiric therapy. Consequently, in such clinical scenarios, empirical therapy should be guided by its unique resistance pattern, favoring carbapenems, vancomycin, or piperacillin–tazobactam, often combined with a nitroimidazole, alongside urgent source control.

1. Introduction

Clostridium tertium is an aerotolerant, spore-forming, Gram-positive bacillus, an uncommon but increasingly recognized opportunistic human pathogen. As part of the normal microbiota, it colonizes the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and is also present in soil. It primarily causes infection in immunocompromised hosts, patients with underlying gastrointestinal disorders, or following abdominal procedures [1]. Unlike many toxigenic Clostridium species, C. tertium has historically been regarded as non-toxin-producing, although its pathogenic mechanisms are under reevaluation [2].
Its clinical management is complicated by two key characteristics. First, accurate identification is challenging due to its aerotolerant nature, which permits growth under ambient atmospheric conditions and frequently leads to misidentification as Bacillus, Lactobacillus, or even Gram-negative rods in routine cultures [3,4]. Second, it exhibits an atypical and challenging antimicrobial susceptibility profile. This includes variable susceptibility to metronidazole, frequent resistance to clindamycin and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins [4,5], and, notably, a predictable resistance to many third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefotaxime [6,7]. This specific resistance profile may facilitate its selection and emergence as a breakthrough pathogen in patients receiving empirical therapy with these agents.
C. tertium infections have been documented in diverse clinical contexts, including necrotizing soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis, empyema, and ocular infections, typically following compromise of local barriers or direct inoculation. However, due to its diagnostic pitfalls and atypical susceptibility pattern, the full clinical spectrum and optimal management strategies remain incompletely defined. To address this knowledge gap, we report a novel case of postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia due to C. tertium in an elderly patient following emergency surgery for an obstructed obturator hernia, and complement it with a comprehensive review of published international case reports and series, including literature in English, Chinese, and other languages. This work aims to delineate the clinical spectrum of C. tertium infections, compare its epidemiological patterns across different host populations, and synthesize a contemporary evidence base to guide risk assessment and therapeutic decision-making.

2. Case Presentation

A 75-year-old woman presented with acute abdominal pain, distension, nausea, and vomiting one day after a mechanical fall, later developing coffee-ground vomitus. A computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a right obturator hernia with small bowel involvement, proximal bowel dilation, intra-abdominal fluid, and pneumatosis, confirming acute small bowel obstruction. Her vital signs were stable on admission, but laboratory tests revealed leukocytosis (white blood cell count 11.75 × 109/L, reference range: 3.5–9.5 × 109/L) with a neutrophilic predominance (89.4%, reference range: 40–75%) and C-reactive protein (42.38 mg/L, reference range: 0–3.0 mg/L). Following preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, she underwent emergency laparoscopic surgery which included hernia reduction, resection of non-viable bowel, peritoneal lavage, and placement of a drain. Intraoperative hypotension occurred and was managed with vasopressor support, followed by transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Empiric intravenous cefoperazone–sulbactam was initiated for intra-abdominal infection. However, her condition deteriorated on postoperative day 2, necessitating mechanical ventilation. Significant leukocytosis (white blood cell count 18.40 × 109/L, reference range: 3.5–9.5 × 109/L) and rising inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein 84.26 mg/L, reference range: 0–3.0 mg/L, procalcitonin 6.03 ng/mL, reference range: 0–0.5 ng/mL) were observed alongside persistent abdominal tenderness and drainage of purulent fluid. After inoculation of blood and peritoneal drainage samples onto blood agar plates and anaerobic incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, the isolated organism was identified as C. tertium using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Autobio MS-600 instrument (Autobio Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China)). Formal antimicrobial susceptibility testing was not performed as standardized anaerobic susceptibility testing protocols were unavailable at our institution. Given the clinical progression despite the initial regimen (cefoperazone–sulbactam) and based on the literature reports indicating the potential efficacy of piperacillin–tazobactam combined with a nitroimidazole against C. tertium infections [8,9], the empirical therapy was switched to piperacillin–tazobactam plus levornidazole (a nitroimidazole antimicrobial).
Source control was maintained via the indwelling drain, along with general supportive care in the ICU. As inflammatory markers declined, enteral nutrition was initiated. The patient’s condition gradually improved, followed by normalization of leukocyte count and inflammatory markers. Antibiotics were discontinued after a 10-day course, as the patient achieved clinical resolution (normalized leukocyte count, resolution of abdominal tenderness, and negative repeat cultures) and in accordance with recommendations for intra-abdominal infections caused by anaerobic pathogens. She was subsequently transferred to a general ward and made a full recovery, and was discharged home two weeks later.

Literature Review Methodology

To complement our case findings and summarize the existing evidence on C. tertium infections, we conducted a comprehensive, non-systematic narrative review of the literature. We performed literature searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang Database for articles published up to December 2025, using search terms including “Clostridium tertium,” “C. tertium infection,” and “C. tertium bacteremia.” Additional references were identified through bibliography screening. We included published case reports and series describing human infections with microbiologically confirmed C. tertium. Reviews, non-human studies, and duplicate reports were excluded. Data on patient demographics, clinical features, management, and outcomes were extracted by one author and cross-checked by another. Therefore, given the narrative and integrative aim of this review, a formal systematic review protocol was not preregistered, and a risk of bias assessment of individual case reports was not performed.

3. Discussion

3.1. Clinical and Epidemiological Spectrum

This report describes a novel presentation of postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia caused by C. tertium following emergency surgery for an obstructed obturator hernia. This case, involving an elderly patient with acute bowel compromise but without classic neutropenia, expands the recognized clinical spectrum beyond severely immunocompromised hosts and underscores its role as an opportunistic pathogen in settings of gastrointestinal barrier disruption. To contextualize our findings, we conducted a comprehensive narrative literature review as detailed in Section Literature Review Methodology, which included for analysis five case series (74 patients) and 44 case reports (53 patients), in addition to our index case.
Our analysis reveals two distinct epidemiological patterns (summarized in Table 1 and Table 2). Case series data depict a highly uniform profile: infections occur almost exclusively in severely neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies (98.6%, 73/74), universally present as bacteremia (100%), and are strongly linked to prior broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure [10]. This clustering [11] points to an endogenous, gut-derived pathogenesis facilitated by chemotherapy-induced mucosal injury, impaired immunity, and antibiotic selective pressure (e.g., from third-generation cephalosporins [12]).
In contrast, aggregated individual case reports present a more diverse picture. While bacteremia remains common (61.1%, 33/54), localized infections (intra-abdominal, soft tissue/bone, central nervous system) are frequently reported. Underlying conditions are broader, including cirrhosis, trauma, and postoperative states, with a lower prevalence of neutropenia (40.7%, 22/54), indicating increasing recognition in non-neutropenic hosts with local barrier breakdown [1,31]. Consequently, the isolation of C. tertium from sterile sites should prompt evaluation for occult gastrointestinal pathology or anatomical communications with the gut [23].
The pathogenesis of C. tertium infection is tightly linked to barrier disruption and bacterial translocation. Key risk factors include intestinal mucosal injury, neutropenia, and prior exposure to β-lactam antibiotics, particularly third-generation cephalosporins [11,13]. In neutropenic patients, chemotherapy-induced damage facilitates systemic spread, leading to breakthrough bacteremia [10,19]. In non-neutropenic hosts, conditions like cirrhosis, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent surgery serve as the portal of entry [13], as seen in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [2,8], post-surgical infections [38], and cases following acute colitis or pancreatitis [3,4,35]. Recent cases of ocular infection [47] and empyema [48] further exemplify mechanisms of direct inoculation or contiguous spread.
Despite its historical classification as non-toxigenic, emerging genomic insights reveal putative virulence factors (e.g., EndoA interferase, hemolytic phospholipase C) that may contribute to tissue damage and severe localized infections [21,23]. Clinical severity is reflected in significant rates of septic shock and mortality (ranging from ~14% to 71% in compiled series), often driven by underlying host conditions or polymicrobial sepsis [10,13]. These findings underscore that C. tertium, while often of low individual virulence, can trigger life-threatening illness in compromised hosts.

3.2. Diagnostic Challenges and Advances

Accurate identification of C. tertium has been historically challenging due to its aerotolerance, variable Gram-staining (often leading to misidentification as Bacillus or Lactobacillus), and ability to form spores [20,21,22]. The advent of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has revolutionized its identification, as exemplified in our case, providing rapid and accurate results that overcome traditional phenotypic pitfalls [7]. In resource-limited settings lacking MALDI-TOF MS, molecular techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing provide a valuable diagnostic alternative, enabling precise species-level identification.

3.3. Management Principles and Antimicrobial Therapy

The management of C. tertium infection is fundamentally predicated on the concurrent application of two principles: prompt and definitive source control, and antimicrobial therapy deliberately selected to overcome its characteristic resistance profile [27,38,40]. For invasive infections, this translates to immediate surgical interventions such as debridement for necrotizing soft tissue infections, drainage for empyema or abscesses, and removal of infected devices.
The selection of antimicrobial agents must be guided by a clear understanding of the pathogen’s susceptibility patterns, as synthesized from 38 clinical isolates in Table 3. It is important to note that the data in Table 3 span a long publication period (1963–2025), and temporal evolution in susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints may influence the interpretation of these aggregated rates. Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem) and vancomycin demonstrated 100% susceptibility, solidifying their role as cornerstone therapeutic options for serious infections [12,35]. In stark contrast, therapeutic regimens should deliberately avoid clindamycin and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefepime, given their associated high resistance rates of 90.0% and 85.7%, respectively [7,12]. Despite the reported susceptibility of piperacillin–tazobactam being 76.5% (Table 3), its combination with a nitroimidazole (e.g., levornidazole or metronidazole) has been reported as a clinically used strategy, as demonstrated in our case and supported by several reports [8,9]. This approach may be particularly rational in intra-abdominal infections to ensure broad anaerobic coverage and address frequent polymicrobial involvement, although robust in vitro synergy data specific to C. tertium are lacking.
A significant area of therapeutic uncertainty lies in the variable activity of other agents. Susceptibility to penicillins and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations is inconsistent. Perhaps most critically for empirical anaerobic coverage, metronidazole demonstrates a non-negligible rate of non-susceptibility (11.1%), challenging its reliability when C. tertium is suspected [4,27].
In the present case, the initial clinical progression despite therapy with cefoperazone–sulbactam may be explained by the organism’s inherent resistance profile [11,22]. The escalation to piperacillin–tazobactam combined with levornidazole represented a pragmatic strategy, utilizing an alternative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor while providing reinforced anaerobic coverage based on the literature reports of efficacy [8,9]. For severe infections, an initial combination therapy is often employed, typically followed by a total treatment course of 14 to 28 days. Ultimately, successful outcomes depend on integrating rapid diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy that strategically bypasses predictable resistances, and uncompromising source control.

4. Conclusions

We report a novel case of C. tertium postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia following emergency obstructed hernia repair in a non-neutropenic patient. The successful outcome, achieved through timely surgical source control and literature-guided antimicrobial therapy, underscores the manageability of this infection when its unique resistance profile is considered. Our integrated analysis of 128 cases delineates two principal epidemiological patterns: breakthrough bacteremia in neutropenic hosts and a broader spectrum of localized infections in non-neutropenic hosts, both frequently associated with gastrointestinal barrier compromise.
Key clinical implications derived from this review include: (1) empirical antimicrobial therapy should avoid expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and clindamycin, favoring agents like carbapenems, vancomycin, or piperacillin–tazobactam, with caution regarding metronidazole non-susceptibility; (2) prompt and adequate source control is critical; and (3) recognizing that patient outcomes are significantly influenced by underlying comorbidities and polymicrobial sepsis, necessitating holistic management.
This study has several limitations. Foremost, the absence of formal antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the index isolate precludes definitive confirmation of its resistance pattern and limits its contribution to local epidemiology. Furthermore, because the literature synthesis spans over six decades, it inherently incorporates heterogeneity in data quality, reporting standards, and susceptibility testing methodologies. The analysis is also subject to the inherent biases of published case reports and series, such as publication bias and selective reporting. Taken together, these constraints confined our study to a comprehensive narrative synthesis, precluding a formal meta-analysis.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: J.L. and Z.M. Literature review and methodology: J.L., G.Z. and X.Z. Data curation: J.L., Z.M. and Y.Z. Analysis and interpretation of data: J.L., G.Z. and X.Z. Writing—review and editing: All authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of IEC for Clinical Research of Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (protocol code 2026ZDSYLL039-P01, 12 March 2026).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the subject in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author(s) used DeepSeek-V3.2 (DeepSeek AI) for the purposes of language refinement and text editing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nambiar, P.H.; Belden, K.A.; Roslund, B.; Silibovsky, R. Sustained Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Nonneutropenic Patient: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 2016, 24, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sutton, S.S.; Jumper, M.; Shah, A.; Edun, B. Clostridium tertium Peritonitis and Concurrent Bacteremia in a Patient with a History of Alcoholic Cirrhosis. J. Investig. Med. High Impact Case Rep. 2017, 5, 2324709617731457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Séverin, A.; Rémi, P.; Berth, A.; Balgone, L.; Coudray, J.M.; Thyrault, M. Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Clostridium tertium Septicaemia. Presse Med. 2005, 34, 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leegaard, T.M.; Sandven, P.; Gaustad, P. Clostridium tertium: 3 Case Reports. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 37, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. You, M.J.; Shin, G.W.; Lee, C.S. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Glyphosate Ingestion. Am. J. Case Rep. 2015, 16, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  6. Thaler, M.; Gill, V.; Pizzo, P.A. Emergence of Clostridium tertium as a Pathogen in Neutropenic Patients. Am. J. Med. 1986, 81, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salvador, F.; Porte, L.; Durán, L.; Marcotti, A.; Pérez, J.; Thompson, L.; Noriega, L.M.; Lois, V.; Weitzel, T. Breakthrough Bacteremia due to Clostridium tertium in a Patient with Neutropenic Fever, and Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, e1062–e1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wazir, M.; Jain, A.G.; Nadeem, M.; Ur Rahman, A.; Everett, G. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Non-neutropenic Patient with Liver Cirrhosis. Cureus 2019, 11, e4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lamberto, Y.; Huarachi-Chirilla, Y.; Dominguez, C.; Saul, P.; Chedjack, V.; Cunto, E. Bacteriemia por Clostridium tertium en un paciente con cirrosis hepática. Medicina 2023, 83, 635–638. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shah, S.; Hankenson, J.; Pabbathi, S.; Greene, J.; Nanjappa, S. Clostridium tertium in Neutropenic Patients: Case Series at a Cancer Institute. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 51, 44–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Valtonen, M.; Sivonen, A.; Elonen, E. A Cluster of Seven Cases of Clostridium tertium Septicemia in Neutropenic Patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1990, 9, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Speirs, G.; Warren, R.E.; Rampling, A. Clostridium tertium Septicemia in Patients with Neutropenia. J. Infect. Dis. 1988, 158, 1336–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miller, D.L.; Brazer, S.; Murdoch, D.; Reller, L.B.; Corey, G.R. Significance of Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in Neutropenic and Nonneutropenic Patients: Review of 32 Cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 975–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. King, B.M.; Ranck, B.A.; Daugherty, F.D.; Rau, C.A. Clostridium tertium Septicemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1963, 269, 467–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Butler, T.; Pitt, S. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis due to Clostridium tertium. Gastroenterology 1982, 82, 133–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weiser, J. Case Report: Rare Isolate from a Blood Culture (Clostridium tertium). Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 1987, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Johnson, J.R.; Tenover, F.C. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Aspiration Pneumonia: An Elusive Diagnosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1988, 157, 854–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leichtman, D.A.; LeBar, W.D. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Leukemia Patient. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1989, 8, 314–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brown, E.A.; Talbot, G.H.; Provencher, M.; Cassileth, P. Anaerobic Bacteremia in Patients with Acute Leukemia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1989, 10, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lew, J.F.; Wiedermann, B.L.; Sneed, J.; Campos, J.; McCullough, D. Aerotolerant Clostridium tertium Brain Abscess following a Lawn Dart Injury. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 2127–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coleman, N.; Speirs, G.; Khan, J.; Broadbent, V.; Wight, D.G.; Warren, R.E. Neutropenic Enterocolitis Associated with Clostridium tertium. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993, 46, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gosbell, I.B.; Johnson, C.G.; Newton, P.J.; Jelfs, J. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia: 2 Cases and Review. Pathology 1996, 28, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kourtis, A.P.; Weiner, R.; Belson, K.; Richards, F.O., Jr. Clostridium tertium Meningitis as the Presenting Sign of a Meningocele in a Twelve-Year-Old Child. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1997, 16, 527–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Steyaert, S.; Peleman, R.; Vaneechoutte, M.; De Baere, T.; Claeys, G.; Verschraegen, G. Septicemia in Neutropenic Patients Infected with Clostridium tertium Resistant to Cefepime and Other Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporins. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3778–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gredlein, C.M.; Silverman, M.L.; Downey, M.S. Polymicrobial Septic Arthritis due to Clostridium species: Case Report and Review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 30, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheah, F.C.; Lim, K.E.; Boo, N.Y. Clostridium tertium in Cerebrospinal Fluid of a Premature Neonate with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Contamination or Real? Acta Paediatr. 2001, 90, 704–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ray, P.; Das, A.; Singh, K.; Bhansali, A.; Yadav, T.D. Clostridium tertium in Necrotizing Fasciitis and Gangrene. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 1347–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tappe, D.; Dirks, J.; Müller, R.; Brederlau, J.; Abele-Horn, M.; Suerbaum, S.; Kurzai, O. Fatal Clostridium tertium Septicemia in a Nonneutropenic Patient. J. Infect. 2005, 50, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. del Rosario-Quintana, C.; Monzón-Moreno, C.; Ojeda-Vargas, M. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in an Exalcoholic Elderly Man. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2006, 24, 401–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Fujitani, S.; Liu, C.X.; Finegold, S.M.; Song, Y.L.; Mathisen, G.E. Clostridium tertium Isolated from Gas Gangrene Wound; Misidentified as Lactobacillus spp. Initially Due to Aerotolerant Feature. Anaerobe 2007, 13, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vanderhofstadt, M.; André, M.; Lonchay, C.; Levecque, P.; Holemans, X.; Canon, J.L.; D’Hondt, L. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia: Contamination or True Pathogen? A Report of Two Cases and a Review of the Literature. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, e335–e337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Steensma, E.A.; Ertl, C.W.; Burke, L.H. Clostridium tertium Isolated from a Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection in a Diabetic but Otherwise Nonimmunocompromised Patient. J. Am. Coll. Certif. Wound Spec. 2011, 3, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Virot, E.; Servien, E.; Laurent, F.; Ferry, T.; Lyon Bone and Joint Infection Study Group. Reactivation of Clostridium tertium Bone Infection 30 Years after the Iran–Iraq War. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr2014209169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Joichi, Y.; Kayama, S.; Hayashi, I.; Onodera, M.; Furushimo, M.; Koba, Y.; Yokozaki, M.; Ohge, H.; Sugai, M. Two Cases of Clostridium tertium Infection and Successful Identification of the Organism by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis. Ann. Lab. Med. 2016, 36, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. Chalhoub, V.; Kallab, R.; El Hajj, A.; Hachem, K.; Yazbeck, P. Septic Shock due to Clostridium tertium in an Immunocompetent Patient Following Colitis without Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2016, 35, 167–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. González-Alad, M.J.; Alonso Sanz, M. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Febrile Neutropenia: Potential Benefit of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 2016, 38, 117–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, A.P.; Zou, J.M.; Yin, Y.H. Characterization of a Strain of Clostridium tertium Causing Intracranial Infection. Chin. J. Infect. Chemother. 2016, 16, 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  38. Alroumi, F.; Giaccotto, J.; Sarwar, A.; McQuillen, D.P. Clostridium tertium Empyema after a Hemi-colectomy and Repair of Incarcerated Hernia. Surg. Infect. Case Rep. 2016, 1, 146–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cong, P.S.; He, H.; Peng, L.J.; Huang, X.L.; Liu, J.; Sun, G.R. Postoperative Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Intestinal Obstruction: Case Report. Chin. J. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 11, 446–448. [Google Scholar]
  40. Barakat, M.; Hernandez, S.; Benoit, J.; Pourshahid, S.; Mamoon, Y.; Martin, G.T. Clostridium tertium: An Unusual Cause of Pyogenic Liver Abscess. ACG Case Rep. J. 2018, 5, e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Milano, V.; Biehle, L.; Patel, S.; Hammer, J. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia and Hepatic Abscess in a Non-neutropenic Patient. IDCases 2019, 15, e00510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, J.; Hu, L.; Huo, M.; Mao, M.Z.; Zhen, J.C. Bone Infection due to Clostridium tertium: Case Reports and Literature Review. Clin. Med. J. 2019, 17, 80–83. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morikawa, K.; Nozaki, M.; Hirata, K.; Abe, T.; Yanagihara, I.; Wada, K. Clostridium tertium Peritonitis and Bacteremia in a Neonate with Congenital Intestinal Atresia: A Case Report. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021, 40, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bonda, S.; Lee, K.; Rovig, J.; Asad, S. Clostridium Bacteremia and its Implications: A Case Report. IDCases 2022, 29, e01516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Saad, E.; Egoryan, G.; Padmanabhan, S.V.; Trongtorsak, A.; Ramachandran, A.; Zhang, Q.; Mohamed, K.; Friedman, H.J. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia: A Marker of an Underlying Perforated Colonic Diverticular Disease in a Non-neutropenic Patient with COVID-19. J. Med. Cases 2022, 13, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Duan, Y.; Chen, X.Y.; Wang, Y.Q. Bloodstream Infection Caused by Clostridium tertium: One Case Report and Literature Review. Chin. J. Infect. Chemother. 2023, 23, 323–327. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhu, W.; Xing, Y. A Case of Ocular Infection with Clostridium tertium Caused by a Salute Gun Explosion. Clin. Lab. 2024, 70, 1769–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lovering, E.; Haque, O.; Wolff, M. Pleural Empyema due to Polymicrobial Clostridioides difficile, Clostridium tertium and Robinsoniella peoriensis following C. difficile Peritonitis. Anaerobe 2025, 96, 103013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Clostridium tertium infections in immunocompromised hosts: summary of case series.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Clostridium tertium infections in immunocompromised hosts: summary of case series.
Authors/
Publication Year
No. of
Cases
Age Range
(Years)
Sex
(M:F)
Clinical
Features
Predisposing
Factors
Effective Antimicrobial TherapyOutcome
Thaler M et al., 1986 [6]109–646:4Bacteremia (7), Intra-
abdominal infection
/Perirectal cellulitis (5), Intra-abdominal abscess (2), Pleural empyema (1), Fever
Hematologic malignancies (9/10), Neutropenia, Prior broad-
spectrum antibiotics
Vancomycin (added in 5 cases), Chloramphenicol (added in 4 cases)6 survived; 4 died (underlying disease progression, polymicrobial sepsis)
Speirs G et al., 1988 [12]1814–7910:8bacteremia (18), Abdominal pain/Diarrhea/Rectal bleeding (15), Perianal cellulitis (3)Hematologic malignancies (18), Neutropenia (18), Prior 3rd-gen cephalosporin useVancomycin (used in 14/18 patients)14 survived; 4 died (polymicrobial bacteremia, septic shock)
Valtonen M et al., 1990 [11]719–583:4Bacteremia (7), Perirectal/
Cecal cellulitis (3), Febrile neutropenia
Acute leukemia (7), Neutropenia (7), Recent 3rd-gen cephalosporin therapyVancomycin, (added to regimen in 5 patients)6 survived; 1 died (disseminated aspergillosis, pulmonary embolism)
Miller DL et al., 2001 [13]3216–7520:12Bacteremia (32), Febrile episode (32), Gastrointestinal symptoms (19)Neutropenia (29/32), Hematologic malignancies, Chemotherapy, β-lactam exposureNot specified per case28 survived; 4 died within 1 week (underlying leukemia, polymicrobial infection, bowel ischemia)
Shah S et al., 2016 [10]736–824:3Bacteremia (7), Febrile neutropenia (7), Gastrointestinal complaints (4)AML/MDS (7), Neutropenia (7),
Chemotherapy
Vancomycin (used in 6/7 patients), Ciprofloxacin, Metronidazole (used in combination)2 survived; 5 died (progression of hematologic malignancy)
Note: M: male, F: female, AML: acute myeloid leukemia, MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome, ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CML: chronic myeloid leukemia, NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis, SBP: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, ESRD: end-stage renal disease.
Table 2. Clinical data summary of 53 patients with Clostridium tertium infection.
Table 2. Clinical data summary of 53 patients with Clostridium tertium infection.
Authors/
Publication Year
Age/
Gender
Clinical SymptomsSpecimenPossible Risk FactorsProbable SourceAntimicrobial Therapy Following Clostridium tertium DiagnosisCourse of Treatment
King BM et al., 1963 [14]7/MFever, cough, leukocytosis, lung consolidationBloodInfluenza-like illnessRespiratoryPenicillinSurvived
7/MFever, leukocytosis, lung consolidationBloodInfluenza-like illnessRespiratoryPenicillin, tetracyclineSurvived
Butler T et al., 1982 [15]42/FJaundice, ascites, feverAscitic fluidCirrhosis, prior antibioticsGITCefoxitinSurvived
Weiser J et al., 1987 [16]60/FFever, bowel obstructionBloodSevere retardation, surgeryNSPenicillinSurvived
Johnson JR et al., 1988 [17]48/MFever, respiratory distress, leukocytosisBlood, sputumAlcohol withdrawal, aspiration pneumoniaAspiration pneumoniaCefazolinSurvived
Leichtman DA et al., 1989 [18]72/FFever, confusion, hearing deficitBloodCML, severe leukopeniaMiddle ear infectionCefazolinSurvived
Brown EA et al., 1989 [19]29/MFever, neutropeniaBloodALL, chemotherapyGITVancomycin, clindamycinSurvived
Lew JF et al., 1990 [20]8/FPeriorbital swelling, frontal abscessSwab, brain tissuePenetrating injury, soil contaminationSoil/woundPenicillin GSurvived
Coleman N et al., 1993 [21]15/MDiarrhea, abdominal pain, neutropeniaBlood, fecesALL relapse, neutropeniaGITCiprofloxacin, vancomycinSurvived
Gosbell IB et al., 1996 [22]19/FFever, abdominal pain, neutropeniaBloodALL relapse, neutropeniaGITMetronidazole, vancomycinSurvived
57/FDiarrhea, fever, abdominal sepsisBloodUlcerative colitis, intra-abdominal sepsisIntra-abdominal sepsisCiprofloxacin and metronidazole after ticarcillin/
clavulanate and gentamicin
Survived
Kourtis AP et al., 1997 [23]12/FHeadache, fever, meningitisCSFCongenital fistulae, prior antibioticsGIT/
genital tract
Vancomycin, metronidazoleSurvived
Steyaert S et al., 1999 [24]65/MFever, diarrhea, neutropeniaBloodAML, neutropeniaGITVancomycinSurvived
55/MFever, diarrhea, neutropeniaBloodALL, neutropeniaGITVancomycinSurvived
Gredlein CM et al., 2000 [25]37/MFoot edema, warmth, erythemaSynovial fluidPenetrating traumaSoil/traumaClindamycin, penicillin GSurvived
Miller DL et al., 2001 [13]28/MAbdominal pain, diarrheaBloodCrohn’s diseaseGITCiprofloxacin, clindamycinSurvived
Cheah FC et al., 2001 [26]Preterm/MFeeding intolerance, abdominal distensionCSFPrematurity, NECGITPenicillin, metronidazoleDied (catheter-related septicemia)
Ray P et al., 2003 [27]58/MUlcers, fever, leg gangreneNecrotic tissueAlcoholism, lymphoma, chemotherapySoil/GITMetronidazole, vancomycin, imipenemSurvived
40/MLeg gangrene, feverNecrotic tissueTraumaSoil/woundPenicillin, metronidazoleSurvived
Séverin A et al., 2005 [3]61/FAbdominal pain, septic shockAbdominal fluid, bloodPancreatitis, prior antibioticsSoil/GITCiprofloxacin, piperacillin/
tazobactam
Died (nosocomial pneumonia)
Tappe D et al., 2005 [28]51/FAbdominal pain, septic shockBloodIleus, postoperative stateGITMezlocillin, metronidazoleDied (septic shock with multi-organ failure)
Leegaard TM et al., 2005 [4]53/MFever, neutropeniaBloodAML, neutropeniaGITImipenemSurvived
33/FFever, pancytopeniaBloodMDS, stem cell transplantGITMeropenemDied (multi-organ failure)
12/FFever, neutropeniaBloodALL relapse, neutropeniaGITGentamicin, amoxicillinSurvived
Del Rosario-
Quintana C et al.,
2006 [29]
80/MJaundice, ascitesAscitic fluidCirrhosis, nursing homeGITImipenemSurvived
Fujitani S et al., 2007 [30]51/MSkin abscesses, myonecrosisWound materialIV drug use, skin poppingHeroin/skinAmoxicillin/
clavulanate and metronidazole after ampicillin/
sulbactam and metronidazole
Survived
Vanderhofstadt M et al., 2010 [31]51/MAsymptomatic bacteremiaBloodAML, pancytopeniaGITAmoxicillin/
clavulanate, ceftazidime
Survived
23/FFever, leukopeniaBloodLymphoma, chemotherapyGITAmoxicillin/clavulanate, amikacin, ceftazidimeSurvived
Steensma EA et al., 2011 [32]39/MCellulitis, myonecrosisTissueDiabetes, IV drug useSkin/environmentPenicillin GSurvived
Salvador F et al., 2013 [7]47/FFever, abdominal pain, neutropeniaBloodALL, chemotherapyGITMeropenem, vancomycinSurvived
Virot E et al., 2015 [33]40/MKnee pain, bone infectionBone tissueShrapnel injurySoil/woundAmoxicillin, pristinamycinSurvived
You M-J et al., 2015 [5]44/FFever, leukopeniaBloodHerbicide ingestionGITErtapenem, metronidazoleSurvived
Joichi Y et al., 2016 [34]50s/MShock, hypothermiaBloodNSGITPiperacillin/
tazobactam
Died (septic shock)
60s/MFever, neutropeniaBloodAML, chemotherapyGITMeropenem, vancomycinSurvived
Chalhoub V et al., 2016 [35]54/FAbdominal pain, septic shockBloodAcute colitisGITAmpicillin, imipenem, vancomycinSurvived
Nambiar PH et al., 2016 [1]53/FAbdominal pain, abscessBlood, abscess fluidPancreatic cancer, surgeryGITMeropenemSurvived
González-Alad MJ et al.,
2016 [36]
6/NSFever, neutropeniaBloodAML, stem cell transplantGITVancomycinSurvived
Zhang AP et al., 2016 [37]52/MHeadache, meningitisCSFScalp traumaExternal environmentVancomycinSurvived
Alroumi F et al., 2016 [38]75/MDyspnea, empyemaPleural fluidAbdominal surgery, steroidsGITClindamycin, vancomycinSurvived
Sutton SS et al., 2017 [2]60/MAbdominal pain, ascitesAscitic fluidCirrhosis, hernia repairGITVancomycin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazoleSurvived
Cong PS et al., 2018 [39]69/MAbdominal pain, obstructionBloodIntestinal volvulus, surgeryGITImipenem, metronidazoleSurvived
Barakat M et al., 2018 [40]70/MLiver abscessAbscess fluidDiverticulosis, COPDGITPiperacillin/
tazobactam, metronidazole
Survived
Wazir M et al., 2019 [8]62/MAscites, encephalopathyBloodCirrhosis, SBPGITMeropenem, vancomycinDied (shock and respiratory failure)
Milano V et al., 2019 [41]43/MHepatic abscessBloodAppendectomy, peritonitisGITErtapenemSurvived
Li J et al., 2019 [42]55/FOsteomyelitisBone tissue, secretionsOpen fractureTrauma/woundMetronidazoleSurvived
44/FOsteomyelitisBone tissue, secretionsOpen traumaTrauma/woundMetronidazoleSurvived
Morikawa K et al., 2021 [43]1d/FSepsis, abdominal distensionBlood,
ascitic fluid
Ileal atresia, perforationGITMeropenem, vancomycinSurvived
Bonda S et al., 2022 [44]79/MSeptic shock, peritonitisBloodColon perforation, alcoholismGITMeropenemSurvived
Saad E et al., 2022 [45]66/FSeptic shock, diverticulitisBloodCOVID-19, diabetes, steroidsGITMeropenem, metronidazole, amoxicillin/
clavulanate
Survived
Lamberto Y et al., 2023 [9]48/MPeritonitis, septic shockBlood, abdominal fluidCirrhosis, hernia surgeryGITPiperacillin/
tazobactam
Died (septic shock)
Duan Y et al., 2023 [46]68/FDiarrhea, feverBloodPancreatic cancer, chemotherapyGITPiperacillin/
tazobactam
Survived
Zhu W et al., 2024 [47]54/MOcular trauma, infectionEye secretionsExplosion injuryExternal environmentVancomycin, levofloxacinSurvived
Lovering E et al., 2025 [48]60s/MEmpyema, pleural effusionPleural fluidESRD, prior peritonitisGITMetronidazoleDied after 4 months (respiratory distress)
Note: Abbreviations as in Table 1; GIT: gastrointestinal tract, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NS: not specified.
Table 3. Summary of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in reported cases of Clostridium tertium infection (1963–2025).
Table 3. Summary of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in reported cases of Clostridium tertium infection (1963–2025).
Antimicrobial Class & AgentSensitive (S)Intermediate +
Resistant
Total Isolates TestedSusceptibility Rate (S%)
Penicillins (Penicillin G, Ampicillin)1682466.7
β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors (e.g., Amoxicillin–Clavulanate, Piperacillin–Tazobactam)1341776.5
Cephalosporins
1st/2nd Generation (e.g., Cefazolin, Cefalotin)43757.1
Cephamycins (e.g., Cefoxitin, Cefotetan)1011190.9
3rd/4th Generation (e.g., Ceftriaxone, Cefepime)2121414.3
Carbapenems (Imipenem, Meropenem, Ertapenem)19019100.0
Vancomycin20020100.0
Metronidazole2432788.9
Clindamycin2182010.0
Fluoroquinolones (e.g., Cliprofloxacin, Levofloxacin)81988.9
Aminoglycosides (e.g., Gentamicin, Amikacin)0550.0
Note: Data are summarized from 38 isolates with susceptibility reported for agents tested in ≥5 cases.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, J.; Zhan, G.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhuge, X. Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Clostridium tertium Infection Following Obstructed Obturator Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review. Pathogens 2026, 15, 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15040348

AMA Style

Lu J, Zhan G, Meng Z, Zhang Y, Zhuge X. Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Clostridium tertium Infection Following Obstructed Obturator Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review. Pathogens. 2026; 15(4):348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15040348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Jin, Guanjun Zhan, Zhongjing Meng, Yuchen Zhang, and Xiangkai Zhuge. 2026. "Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Clostridium tertium Infection Following Obstructed Obturator Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review" Pathogens 15, no. 4: 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15040348

APA Style

Lu, J., Zhan, G., Meng, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhuge, X. (2026). Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Clostridium tertium Infection Following Obstructed Obturator Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review. Pathogens, 15(4), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15040348

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop