Next Article in Journal
Improving HPV Vaccine Coverage in Tennessee: Addressing Barriers and Expanding Access for Mid-Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance and Risk Factors of Canine Bacterial Skin Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variants During the First Year of the Pandemic Highlight the Earlier Emergence of the Zeta Variant of Interest in Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Virome of Terrestrial Mammals and Bats from Southern Brazil: Circulation of New Putative Members of the Togaviridae Family and Other Findings

by
Julyana Sthéfanie Simões Matos
1,*,
Meriane Demoliner
2,
Juliana Schons Gularte
3,
Micheli Filippi
2,
Vyctoria Malayhka de Abreu Góes Pereira
1,
Mariana Soares da Silva
4,
Matheus Nunes Weber
3,
Marcelo Pereira de Barros
5 and
Fernando Rosado Spilki
6
1
Environmental Quality Graduate Program, Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, Brazil
2
Virology Master Program, Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, Brazil
3
Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil
4
Virology Master Program, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, Brazil
5
Environmental Quality Graduate Program, Zoology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, Brazil
6
Environmental Quality Graduate Program and Virology Graduate Program, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2025, 14(4), 310; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040310
Submission received: 26 January 2025 / Revised: 17 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 March 2025 / Published: 24 March 2025

Abstract

:
The surveillance of wildlife viromes is essential for identifying zoonotic threats within the One Health framework. This study analyzed rectal and oral swabs from 88 individuals representing 13 species as felids, wild rodents, marsupials and non-human primates in Southern Brazil using metagenomic sequencing. Akodon montensis (n = 15 individuals) and Coendou spinosus (n = 4) harbored Chikungunya virus (ChikV, Togaviridae), marking its first detection in these hosts. Molossus molossus (n = 17) presented Coronaviridae and Orthoherpesviridae, while Eptesicus furinalis (n = 1) also carried Coronaviridae. A broad virome diversity, including Togaviridae and Adenoviridae members, was identified in Didelphis albiventris (n = 43), with significant relevance to human health. Additional species, such as Callithrix jacchus (n = 1), Leopardus guttulus (n = 1), Myocastor coypus (n = 1), Monodelphis iheringi (n = 1), Thaptomys nigrita (n = 1), Sooretamys angouya (n = 1), Brucepattersonius iheringi (n = 1), and Lasiurus blossevillii (n = 1), contributed to insights into viral reservoirs. These results underscore the importance of virome studies in regions harboring high biodiversity, emphasizing genomic surveillance as a vital tool for monitoring zoonotic viruses and safeguarding global health.

1. Introduction

Viral metagenomics has revolutionized virology by providing culture-independent methods for detecting and characterizing viruses, especially those that cannot be cultured or isolated. This approach focuses on viral nucleic acids, offering new insights into viral ecology, including the diversity, abundance, and functional roles of viruses in different environments [1,2,3]. It is now an essential tool in genomic surveillance, enabling the rapid identification and tracking of viral mutations, which is vital for pandemic monitoring and prevention. This facilitates effective public health responses, particularly in the timely detection of emerging pathogens [3].
Genomic surveillance plays a crucial role in preventing the global spread of potential pathogens, enhancing pandemic preparedness. It has been key in identifying and characterizing viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions [4]. Additionally, genomic analysis is critical for vaccine and antiviral therapy development. By identifying conserved viral targets, it helps design treatments that can withstand viral mutations. Mendes and Silva (2022) [5] emphasize the importance of genomic data for adaptive vaccine strategies that address new viral strains, which may evade existing immunity [5].
Monitoring arboviruses transmitted by vectors is particularly vital due to climate change and human activities that expand the range of mosquito vectors. Real-time surveillance tracks the evolution and spread of these viruses, enabling targeted interventions during outbreaks [6]. The gastrointestinal virome of wild animals also acts as a reservoir for emerging viruses, making wildlife surveillance essential to prevent viral threats to both human and animal populations [7,8]. Recent metagenomic studies have highlighted the vast viral diversity in wildlife, further underscoring the significance of this approach [4,9]. In Brazil, Pinheiro et al. [10] analyzed 58 individuals from the species Molossus molossus and Molossus rufus using metagenomic techniques and identified the presence of viral families, including Poxviridae, Mimiviridae, Retroviridae, Siphoviridae, Myoviridae, Retroviridae, Herpesviridae, Picornaviridae, Phycodnaviridae, Inoviridae, and Dicistroviridae. Duarte et al. [7] collected fecal samples from bird species (Psittacara leucophthalmus, Amazona aestiva, and Sicalis flaveola) and mammal species (Didelphis albiventris, Sapajus libidinosus, and Galictis cuja) within the Cerrado biome in Brazil, employing metagenomic techniques. Among the detected viral families, notable findings included Adenoviridae, Anelloviridae, Circoviridae, Caliciviridae, and Parvoviridae. This study also reported the presence of a novel virus belonging to the Smacoviridae family.
The aim of this study was to identify the viral families present in rectal and oral swabs of wild mammals in Southern Brazil using the metagenomic technique. This type of study in wild animals in this region is unprecedented, and such identification led to the exceptional finding of Chikungunya virus in these animals, which, until now, has not been reported in animals in the region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Area

The study was conducted in the Sinos River Valley region, located in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. The area encompasses 30 municipalities, totaling 3694 km2 and an estimated population of 1,440,500 inhabitants. The predominant climate is subtropical, and the landscape is largely urban, characterized by intensive industrial, agricultural, and livestock activities, with only a few remaining areas of preserved vegetation, free from anthropic interference [11].
The mammalian fauna of this region encompasses species from the Atlantic Forest and Pampa biomes, fulfilling critical ecological functions. Carnivores such as the pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) and the crab-eating raccoon (Procyon cancrivorus); rodents including the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) and the Brazilian guinea pig (Cavia aperea); as well as marsupials like the white-eared opossum (Didelphis albiventris) contribute significantly to ecosystem stability. Additionally, bats from the genera Artibeus and Molossus play essential roles in pollination and insect population regulation. However, the region also harbors wild felids at risk of extinction, including Geoffroy’s cat (Leopardus geoffroyi), the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis), the margay (Leopardus wiedii), the southern tiger cat (Leopardus guttulus), the pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo), and the cougar (Puma concolor), all categorized as vulnerable or endangered. The sampling areas were chosen due to their proximity to human occupation, intense environmental impact, and documented biodiversity. Urbanization and habitat fragmentation constitute major threats to local wildlife, highlighting the urgent need for targeted conservation strategies to ensure the persistence of these species within their native ecosystems.
The collections were conducted in the municipalities of Novo Hamburgo, Campo Bom, Dois Irmãos, and Rolante. Complete information about the samples can be observed in Figure 1.

2.2. Animal Sampling

In this study, rectal and/or oral swabs were collected from the sampled animals. Swabs were collected, identified, and individually stored in tubes containing 3 mL of 0.9% sterile saline solution, then transported in an isothermal box maintained at 5 °C to the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory of Feevale University. At the laboratory, the samples were prepared in 2 mL aliquots for final storage at −80 °C. Table 1 shows the municipalities and locations where the animals were collected, as well as the number of individuals collected for each species.
For the capture of small rodents, opossums, and porcupines, two trapping sessions were conducted per month, each lasting three days. During each session, 30 Tomahawk traps (30 cm × 20 cm × 20 cm) were used, distributed along a transect of approximately 300 m, with the traps spaced approximately 10 m apart. The traps remained in place for the three days of each session. In total, the capture effort totaled 21,600 trap-days over the entire sampling period. The traps were baited with a mixture of peanuts, bananas, sardines, and sardine oil, with approximately 10 grams of bait per trap. The baits were checked and repositioned every 24 h, as needed.
Bats were captured using mist nets in the rural area of Novo Hamburgo (Table 1). Two capture campaigns were conducted at each location, each lasting approximately seven hours, totaling 14 h of capture effort.
Samples from nutria, wild felids, larger opossums, larger porcupines, and White-tufted-ear Marmoset were obtained from Environmental Rescue Centers and Agricultural Services in local municipalities. After capture, all animals were returned to their natural habitats, ensuring health parameters and welfare standards were met prior to release.
The identification of small rodents, opossums, nutria, porcupines, wild felines and White-tufted-ear Marmoset was performed based on regional descriptions, morphological analyses and consultations with the Brazilian Biodiversity Information System (https://www.sibbr.gov.br/, accessed on 31 March 2023). The identification of bats was performed through morphological analysis and support from the Bat Management and Control Guide of the State Health Surveillance Center of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
In this study, 88 animals were subjected to rectal and oral swabbing, totaling 77 samples, collected between March 2022 and March 2023. The species identified across all samplings were Didelphis albiventris (opossum), Coendou spinosus (porcupine), Myocastor coypus (nutria), Leopardus guttulus (Atlantic Forest tiger-cat), Callithrix jacchus (White-tufted-ear Marmoset), Monodelphis iheringi (Ihering’s Three-striped Opossum), Akodon montensis (small wild rodent), Brucepattersonius iheringi (small wild rodent), Thaptomys nigrita (small wild rodent), Sooretamys angouya (small wild rodent), Lasiurus blossevillii (bat), Eptesicus furinalis (bat), and Molossus molossus (bat). Table 1 shows the municipalities and locations where the animals were collected, as well as the number of individuals collected for each species.
For the metagenomics assay, the samples were pooled based on animal species, location, sex, type of swab sample, and collection date. A total of 77 pools, each containing 1 mL and composed of samples from two to four animals, were analyzed. In cases where an animal had only one sample, it was processed individually with a 1 mL aliquot.

2.3. Viral Nucleic Acids Isolation, Enrichment and Sequencing

For the metagenomics assay, pools were homogenized by vortexing and filtered with a 0.45 µm membrane. Nucleic acid extraction was performed using the MagMAX™ CORE nucleic acid purification kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with the automated KingFisher™ Duo Prime system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with Superscript IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,Waltham, MA, USA), followed by second-strand synthesis with NEB Q5 polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the protocol described by Demoliner et al. (2023) [12].
Subsequently, a shotgun metagenomic library was constructed using the Illumina DNA Prep kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Sequencing was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq platform using the 600-cycle V3 reagent kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.4. Viral Metagenomic Data Assembly and Sequence Analyses

Bioinformatics analyses were conducted using the online tool Genome Detective (https://www.genomedetective.com/). The Genome Detective pipeline for viral identification in metagenomics starts with raw FASTQ file input, typically from paired-end sequencing platforms like Illumina MiSeq. The process begins with quality control, where low-quality reads and adapter sequences are removed. Next, the pipeline assembles sequencing reads into contigs using SPAdes, an assembler optimized for metagenomics. These contigs are then subjected to taxonomic classification by aligning them against curated viral reference databases. Genome Detective integrates automated tools for pathogen identification, ensuring accurate recognition of viral genomes, including rare or novel strains, and supports high-throughput data processing to expedite analyses in clinical and environmental settings [13,14].
Post-classification, the pipeline offers features for downstream analysis, such as consensus genome building, phylogenetic tree construction, and the visualization of sequencing coverage and mapping statistics. These capabilities are coupled with annotation tools that refine viral genome characterization. The platform provides robust performance in metagenomics, enabling it to identify co-infections, viral subtypes, and variants within complex samples. The integration of annotation and phylogenetic tools allows for rapid insights into evolutionary relationships and epidemiological trends, making it an invaluable resource for outbreak investigations and pathogen surveillance [15].
Subsequently, for the phylogenetic analysis, complete genome sequences of Chikungunya virus and the ORF-1 region of Torque Teno virus were selected. Initially, the genome was assembled by mapping the reads from the libraries generated for each sample against the reference genome NC 004162 for Chikungunya virus and NC 040617 for the ORF-1 region of Torque Teno virus in Geneious Prime software version 2025.0.3. Next, multiple sequence alignment was conducted using the MAFFT online tool version 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, accessed on 10 January 2025), employing default parameters to optimize the alignment. Phylogenomic inference was then carried out using the IQ-TREE web server (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/, accessed on 10 January 2025), which applied maximum likelihood methods with model selection and ultrafast bootstrap approximation to ensure statistical robustness. Finally, the phylogenetic trees were formatted and refined using MEGA version 11.0.13, facilitating clear visualization and interpretation of evolutionary relationships.
For the analysis of viral diversity, a heatmap demonstrating the relative abundance of viral families present in each animal species was created. The heatmap was generated by considering both the read counts attributed to each viral family within each animal species and the frequency of occurrence of a given viral family across the respective species.

3. Results

3.1. Overview

After performing the metagenomic assay, a total of 9.831.937 reads and 2.5 Gb of information were generated.
Also, CZ ID was used to evaluate the genus found in the metagenomic. Through the analysis of the CZ ID, a total of 54 viral genera were identified in Didelphis albiventris, 29 in Molossus molossus, 17 in Akodon montensis, 9 in Leopardus guttulus, 6 in Monodelphis iheringi, 4 in Coendou spinosus, 2 in Callithrix jacchus, 2 in Eptesicus furinalis, 2 in Lasiurus blossevillii, 2 in Sooretamys angouya, 1 in Brucepattersonius iheringi, 1 in Myocastor coyous, and 1 in Thaptomys nigrita. A heatmap of the findings by viral family was made, and Supplementary Materials contains a table with all the genera found by animal, as well as the heatmap by viral genus created by CZ ID.
Then, a graph illustrating the animal species that exhibited the highest diversity of viral genera was generated (Figure 2). Each bar in the graph represents the quantity of genera that are either unique to a specific species or shared among the analyzed species.

3.2. Viruses in the Studied Species

Callithrix jacchus (White-tufted-ear Marmoset) is an exotic species in the study area, obtained through the Environmental Rescue Center and Agricultural Services. In this study, the viral families found in C. jacchus were all bacteriophages belonging to the Caudovirecetes class.
The rectal swab from T. nigrita (small wild rodent) showed the presence of Caudoviricetes and Peduoviridae viruses. Additionally, the rectal sample from the rodent M. coypus (nutria) showed the presence of Togaviridae-related genomes only, and this is the first report of this viral family in this species.
Additionally, oral samples from A. montensis (small wild rodent) also showed the presence of Straboviridae, Autographiviridae, and Adenoviridae. The viral families common to both type of samples in this species were Togaviridae, Retroviridae, Marseilleviridae, Peduoviridae, and Caudoviricetes.
The oral swab from S. angouya (small wild rodent), and B. iheringi (small wild rodent) showed the presence of Retroviridae-related sequences, while the oral samples from S. angouya (small wild rodent) demonstrated the presence of Caudoviricetes, too.
In rectal samples from M. molossus (bat), Orthoherpesviridae, Retroviridae, Caudoviricetes, Coronaviridae, and Microviridae were detected, while oral samples only showed Caudoviricetes and Microviridae. All oral swab samples from E. furinalis (bat) showed the presence of Retroviridae. For this same type of sample, L. blosevilii (bat) showed the presence of Coronaviridae.
The rectal sample from M. iheringi (Ihering’s Three-striped Opossum) revealed the presence of Riboviria and Caudoviricetes. In the oral sample from the same species, Caudoviricetes and Orthomyxoviridae were detected. This is the first study of these viruses in this species.
For C. spinosus (porcupine), both rectal and oral samples showed the presence of Togaviridae, Retroviridae, and Caudoviricetes.
The samples from D. albiventris exhibited the greatest diversity in terms of the number of viral families found. Furthermore, based on Figure 2, D. albiventris was the species with the highest viral diversity, presenting a total of 54 viral genera. Among these, 39 genera were found exclusively in this species, while the remaining 15 genera were also detected in other animal species. The high viral diversity in D. albiventris is a consequence of the sample size, as this species comprises 50% of the total sampled animals, as well as its omnivorous habits.
Also, Table 2 shows the viral families or classes by species and kind of swab. Figure 3 illustrates the viral families detected in rectal swabs of D. albiventris, while Figure 4 presents the viral families identified in oral swabs from the same species. Subsequently, Figure 5 displays a heatmap that compares the relative abundances of viral families across the studied species. This heatmap was constructed by integrating the quantitative distribution of sequencing reads assigned to each viral family, as well as the incidence rate of detection for each viral family within the respective host species.

3.3. Chikungunya Virus (ChikV)

The Togaviridae family virus found in A. montensis (small wild rodent) and C. spinosus (porcupine) corresponds to the Chikungunya virus (ChikV), with complete genome sequences being found in pools 17, 18, 22, 23 and 24, which were selected for phylogenetic analysis. Table 3 shows the data of each sample. According to the Chikungunya Typing Tool (https://www.genomedetective.com/app/typingtool/chikungunya/, accessed on 31 March 2022), all of them were from ECSA genotype, which could be confirmed by phylogenetic analyses. Figure 6 shows the phylogenetic analyses of ChikV.

3.4. Anellovirus in L. guttulus

The rectal sample from L. guttulus revealed the presence of reads from viral families Anelloviridae, Microviridae, Dicistoviridae, Parvoviridae and Casjensviridae.
The analysis of the Anellovirus genome fragments in the L. guttulus sample was related to the previously identified Rodent Torque Teno Virus 3 (RoTTV-3). These fragments consisted of 5 contigs and 10 reads, with a genome coverage of 27.2% and a nucleotide identity of 86.2%. After detecting the virus through the Genome Detective online platform, blast and phylogenetic analyses were conducted to confirm its similarity to previously reported cases. Figure 7 shows the phylogenetic analysis.

4. Discussion

Callithrix jacchus (White-tufted-ear Marmoset) has become invasive in various regions of Brazil, with a high capacity for adaptation and reproduction, and there are already reports of hybrids in the country. Its adaptability to new habitats leads to competition for shelter and food with native species, potentially causing significant changes in local biodiversity. Additionally, it can be a vector of diseases that affect both other animals and humans, increasing the risk of infectious outbreaks [14]. The presence of C. jacchus in non-native areas can alter the ecological balance, leading to stress and competition with native species, as well as the degradation of the ecosystem in which it is introduced. The potential for disease transmission includes, in particular, zoonotic pathogens that can be transmitted to other wildlife species, domestic animals, and humans. Addressing this issue requires integrated management strategies, such as habitat preservation, control of invasive populations, and awareness campaigns to reduce human–wildlife interactions, especially in urban areas.
The White-tufted-ear Marmoset feeds on a range of items, from fruits and flowers to animal prey such as lizards and frogs, which would explain the presence of bacteriophages in both the oral and rectal swabs. Furthermore, considering the adaptability and invasive occupation of the species, as previously mentioned, this species deserves attention, given that non-human primates are already known to be hosts of many diseases [14].
All small wild rodents collected in this study belong to the family Cricetidae. According to Kane et al. [16], rodents of this family have previously been studied for RNA viruses, and among the viral families present in them is Retroviridae, which were also found in this study. Fan et al. [17] also found Retroviridae virus in small rodents. Kane et al. [16] and Fan et al. [17] also reported Adenoviridae, Marseilleviridae and Togaviridae viruses in small rodents from wild areas.
A study performed in 2023 describes Smarcoviridae and Retroviridae in samples from D. albiventris [18]. Some authors suggest that sequences classified as retroviruses may be proviruses that established themselves in the germline of the genus Didelphis in the past, given that this genus emerged over 4 million years ago [18,19]. While most endogenous retroviruses are defective, some may, upon activation, give rise to progenitor viruses that can infect other cells [18,20].
Bitencourt and Bezerra [21] describe that Alphavirus, a genus of the family Togaviridae, was also found in D. albiventris. This genus is the same found in the Didelphidae animals of this study which presented Togaviridae virus in their samples.
The family Togaviridae has previously been found in small rodents, according to Kane et al. [16]. Also, according to Matusali et al. [22] ChikV was already found in African rodents. The same authors affirm that rodents serve as virus-amplifying hosts. Petitdemange et al. [23] affirm that rodents are one of the hosts responsible for ChikV sylvatic cycles maintenance, although. Even though it’s known that rodents are ChikV hosts, this is the first report of ChikV in A. montensis in Brazil, as well as in C. spinosus.
According to the arbovirus databases for the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil (https://saude.rs.gov.br/arboviroses-paineis-de-dados, accessed on 20 December 2024), autochthonous cases of Chikungunya Fever in humans were reported in the study region during 2022 and 2023. Therefore, the presence of this virus in the samples is plausible. The relationship between outbreaks of human arboviruses and the circulation of these viruses in wild animals reinforces the need for continuous genomic and epidemiological surveillance. Environmental degradation and habitat fragmentation can contribute to the emergence of zoonotic diseases, as they alter vector behavior and host interactions, directly impacting public health [24].
Furthermore, as noted by Bezerra et al. [25], gastrointestinal complaints are among the clinical signs associated with ChikV pathogenesis in humans. Given the current understanding of the virus pathogenesis, it is not entirely possible to refute the potential occurrence of viremia in Akodon montensis and Coendou spinosus, nor can it be ruled out that this species may serve as a host involved in the disease cycle within the study area. However, further evaluations are necessary to verify this hypothesis. Thus, Cavalcanti et al. [26] and Diallo et al. [27] cite that the virus is maintained in a rural enzootic transmission cycle, which occurs between various sylvatic Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquitoes and animal reservoirs.
Migné et al. [28] describe that certain mammals, particularly those belonging to the orders Rodentia and Chiroptera, are considered effective reservoir hosts and/or amplifying hosts due to their significant capacity for locomotion and adaptation to new habitats. Environmental changes and rapid urbanization can facilitate contact between humans and these reservoirs, increasing the risk of zoonotic disease transmission. Conservation strategies, wildlife management, and vector control are essential to reducing these risks and mitigating the emergence of zoonoses, especially the new ones [29].
García-Romero et al. [30] further assert that the emergence and spread of infectious diseases are intrinsically linked to human–environment interactions. In this context, Dobson et al. [31] highlight that conserving biodiversity and reinforcing natural ecological barriers are essential strategies to mitigate the risk of viral spillover, thereby playing a crucial role in preventing future pandemics. Additionally, detecting these diseases in hosts not traditionally considered natural reservoirs provides valuable insights into their complex transmission dynamics, which may require targeted interventions at the levels of the environment, pathogens, and hosts. Furthermore, García-Romero et al. [30] emphasize that well-preserved habitats significantly reduce the likelihood of spillover events, while greater biodiversity is associated with lower disease prevalence among hosts, reinforcing the critical role of ecological integrity in disease prevention.
Additionally, the circulation of arboviruses typically occurs in sylvatic or urban cycles, and disruptions to the natural balance of environmental systems can increase vector abundance, create new reservoirs, or drive arboviruses to adapt in order to maintain a stable transmission cycle. The relationship between humans and various mammalian species is also recognized as a significant factor that promotes the persistence of arbovirus cycles and their hosts [32,33].
Migné et al. [28], Fraiture et al. [34], dos Santos Fonseca et al. [35] and Milich et al. [36] discuss emerging methods for sampling wild animals to detect arboviruses. These authors highlight that the use of non-invasive techniques, such as sampling saliva and feces, can facilitate the diagnosis of these viruses in animals. This approach not only reduces stress on the monitored animals and lowers costs but also expands the range of mammalian orders that can be explored for this purpose, as well.
L. guttulus inhabits a broad variety of habitats, ranging from dense tropical and subtropical rainforests, deciduous and semi-deciduous forests, and mixed pine forests to open savannahs and beach vegetation, both pristine and disturbed [37,38]. It can also inhabit disturbed formations, but the occurrence of this felid is limited by the presence of natural cover. Thus, it is restricted to forest or savannah mosaics and small-scale agriculture. According to Kitchener et al. [39], Rio Grande do Sul State is the type locality for this species.
Diel’s activity pattern is predominantly nocturno-crepuscular, but with a considerable amount of daytime activity. Its prey base consists mostly of small mammals, birds and lizards, with average prey size at <100 g, but does include a few larger-sized prey (>1 kg) [37,40].
Rinaldi et al. [41], evaluating the feeding habits of small neotropical felids in Brazil, found that L. guttulus primarily feeds on Akodontini rodents, including Akodon montensis. The most important food items were Akodontini rodents and Monodelphis sp. marsupials. Prey heavier than 1000 g were not detected in the diet of this felid, corroborating Seibert et al. [42] regarding prey sizes and preferences for this species. Additionally, Oligoryzomys sp. was also found in the diet of L. guttulus by [38].
Anelloviruses, such as Torque Teno Virus (TTV), have been detected in various mammals, including felines and rodents. In rodents, a thorough examination of the natural hosts of anelloviruses is crucial for understanding their host range and transmission dynamics in natural settings [43].
RoTTV was also previously found in fecal samples from Lynx rufus (Bobcat), as reported by Kraberger et al. [44]. These authors suggest that the presence of these viruses in fecal samples may be due to the types of prey consumed by the felines. As demonstrated, L. guttulus can feed on both A. montensis and O. nigripes, and the sizes of these wild rodents fall within the preferred prey sizes for the Atlantic Forest tiger-cat.
Thus, considering the presented phylogenetic analysis and the feeding preference of L. guttulus for A. montensis, O. nigripes, and other small rodents, it is possible that the Anelloviridae fragments were detected in the rectal swab due to the feeding habits of the Atlantic Forest tiger-cat.

5. Conclusions

This study of viral diversity in wild animals from the Sinos River Valley revealed a diverse range of viral families across species. Notably, it marks the first report of a Chikungunya virus-like (ChikV) in the rodent species Akodon montensis in Brazil, as well as in Coendou spinosus. The detection of ChikV, along with other viral families, underscores the importance of genomic surveillance in a One Health framework, emphasizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health in pathogen emergence and transmission. Also, these findings provide valuable insights into the ecological and epidemiological dynamics of these viruses.
Understanding viral circulation in wildlife is critical for anticipating spillover events and mitigating zoonotic risks. Ongoing research into potential reservoirs and vectors, even in species not traditionally considered hosts, is essential for characterizing transmission dynamics and evaluating public health threats. Early detection and the continuous monitoring of emerging viruses in wildlife populations are key to preventing outbreaks and limiting disease spread. Integrating multidisciplinary approaches that consider ecological changes, habitat disturbances, and human-wildlife interactions is fundamental to strengthening disease surveillance and response strategies within a One Health paradigm.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens14040310/s1, Table S1: All the genera found by animal; Figure S1: The heatmap by viral genus created by CZ ID.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, writing—original draft, J.S.S.M.; investigation, project administration, M.D. and J.S.G.; investigation, M.F. and V.M.d.A.G.P.; visualization, writing—review and editing, M.S.d.S. and M.N.W.; funding acquisition, conceptualization, methodology, project administration, visualization, writing—review and editing, F.R.S.; resources, M.P.d.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants Fapergs No. 23/2551-0002221-4 e CNPq No. 405786/2022-0. FRS is a fellow of the Brazilian National Research Council. JSSM received a scholarship from CAPES.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Feevale University Animal Ethics Committee (Approval No. 07/2022; Approval on 25 March 2022), in accordance with Brazilian ethical guidelines for animal research.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The FASTA files for Chikungunya Virus were submitted to the GISAID platform, and the Anellovirus was submitted to the GenBank platform. The accession numbers on the GISAID platform are EPI_ISL_19725188, EPI_ISL_19725187, EPI_ISL_19725186, EPI_ISL_19725185 and EPI_ISL_19725184. The accession number on the GenBank platform is PV112431.1. FASTQ files can be provided to interested parties upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CAPESCoordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel
CNPQBrazilian National Research Council

References

  1. Roux, S.; Páez-Espino, D.; Chen, I.M.A.; Palaniappan, K.; Ratner, A.; Chu, K.; Reddy, T.B.K.; Nayfach, S.; Schulz, F.; Call, L.; et al. IMG/VR v3: An integrated ecological and evolutionary framework for interrogating genomes of uncultivated viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D764–D775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tisza, M.J.; Pastrana, D.V.; Welch, N.L.; Stewart, B.; Peretti, A.; Starrett, G.J.; Pang, Y.Y.S.; Krishnamurthy, S.R.; Pesavento, P.A.; McDermott, D.H.; et al. Discovery of several thousand highly diverse circular DNA viruses. eLife 2020, 9, e51971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sommers, P.; Chatterjee, A.; Varsani, A.; Tubll, G. Integrating Viral Metagenomics into an Ecological Framework. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 8, 133–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, W.T.; Hou, X.; Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; He, H.; Si, W.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Z.; Yan, Z.; Xing, G.; et al. Virome characterization of game animals in China reveals a spectrum of emerging pathogens. Cell 2022, 185, 1117–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mendes, T.; Silva, H. Genomic data in the adaptive development of vaccines for emerging viral threats. Vaccine Res. 2022, 15, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chan, J. The impact of climate change on the spread of arboviral diseases. Clim. Health J. 2023, 12, 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duarte, M.A.; Silva, J.M.F.; Brito, C.R.; Teixeira, D.S.; Melo, F.L.; Ribeiro, B.M.; Nagata, T.S.; Campos, F. Faecal Virome Analysis of Wild Animals from Brazil. Viruses 2019, 11, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dean, K.R.; Dirzo, R.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Khan, I.; Leirs, H.; Shi, Z.L.; Wolfe, N.D.; Yang, R.; Stenseth, N.C. The Animal Origin of Major Human Infectious Diseases: What Can Past Epidemics Teach Us About Preventing the Next Pandemic? Zoonoses 2022, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chukwudozie, K.I.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Xue, J.; Zhang, W.; Shan, T. Viral metagenomic analysis reveals diverse viruses and a novel bocaparvovirus in the enteric virome of snow leopard (Panthera uncia). Heliyon 2024, 10, e29799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pinheiro, L.R.S.; Rodrigues, É.D.L.; Paiva, F.A.d.S.; Cruz, A.C.R.; Medeiros, D.B.d.A.; Casseb, A.d.R.; Silva, S.P.d.; Casseb, L.M.N. Identification of Viruses in Molossus Bats from the Brazilian Amazon: A Descriptive Metagenomic Analysis. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Comitesinos. Sinos River Watershed Management Committee. Characterization of the Sinos River Watershed. 2023. Available online: https://www.comitesinos.com.br/caracterizacao (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  12. Demoliner, M.; Filippi, M.; Gularte, J.; Silva, M.; de Almeida, P.M.; Pereira, V.M.A.G.; Heldt, F.; Spilki, F.R.S. Genome of a husavirus from Southern Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. 2023, 65, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vital, O.V.; Massardi, N.T.; Brasileiro, S.L.S.; Côrrea, T.C.V.; Gjorup, D.F.; Jerusalinsky, L.; de Melo, F.R. New records for Callithrix aurita and Callithrix hybrids in the region of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop. Primates 2020, 26, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bezerra, B.; Bicca-Marques, J.; Miranda, J.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Oliveira, L.; Pereira, D.; Ruiz-Miranda, C.; Valença Montenegro, M.; da Cruz, M.; do Valle, R.R. Callithrix jacchus. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; International Union for Conservation of Nature: Gland, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vilsker, M.; Moosa, Y.; Nooij, S.; Fonseca, V.; Ghysens, Y.; Dumon, K.; Pauwels, R.; Alcantara, L.C.; Vanden Eynden, E.; Vandamme, A.M.; et al. Genome Detective: An automated system for virus identification from high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 871–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kane, Y.; Tendu, A.; Li, R.; Chen, Y.; Mastriani, E.; Lan, J.; Hughes, A.C.; Berthet, N.; Wong, G. Viral diversity in wild and urban rodents of Yunnan Province, China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2024, 13, 2290842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fan, Y.; Hou, Y.; Li, Q.; Dian, Z.; Wang, B.; Xia, X. RNA virus diversity in rodents. Arch Microbiol 2024, 206, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Caserta, L.C.; do Nascimento, G.M.; Joshi, L.R.; Simão, R.M.; Miller, M.E.; Felippe, P.A.N.; Diel, D.G.; Arns, C.W. Bacterial and Viral Diversity of Didelphid Opossums from Brazil. EcoHealth 2023, 20, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dias, C.A.R.; Perini, F.A. Biogeography and early emergence of the genus Didelphis (Didelphimorphia, Mammalia). Zool Scr. 2018, 47, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strauss, J.H.; Strauss, E.G. Viruses Whose Life Cycle Uses Reverse Transcriptase. In Viruses and Human Disease; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 211–259. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bitencourt, M.M.; Bezerra, A.M.R. Infection agents of Didelphidae (Didelphimorphia) of Brazilian underestimated matter in zoonoses research. Mammalia 2022, 86, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Matusali, G.; Colavita, F.; Bordi, L.; Lalle, E.; Ippolito, G.; Capobianchi, M.R.; Castilletti, C. Tropism of the Chikungunya Virus. Viruses 2019, 11, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petitdemange, C.; Wauquier, N.; Vieillard, V. Control of immunopathology during Chikungunya virus infection. J. Allergy Control. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 846–855. [Google Scholar]
  24. Plowright, R.K.; Parrish, C.R.; McCallum, H.; Hudson, P.J.; Ko, A.I.; Graham, A.L.; Lloyd-Smith, J.O. Pathways to zoonotic spillover. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bezerra, W.P.; Moizéis, R.N.C.; Salmeron, A.C.A.; Pereira, H.W.B.; de Araújo, J.M.G.; Guedes, P.M.M.; Fernandes, J.V.; Nascimento, M.S.L. Innate immune response in patients with acute Chikungunya disease. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2023, 212, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cavalcanti, T.Y.V.L.; Pereira, M.R.; de Paula, S.O.; Franca, R.F.d.O. A Review on Chikungunya Virus Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Current Vaccine Development. Viruses 2022, 14, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Diallo, D.; Sall, A.A.; Buenemann, M.; Chen, R.; Faye, O.; Diagne, C.T.; Faye, O.; Ba, Y.; Dia, I.; Watts, D.; et al. Landscape ecology of sylvatic chikungunya virus and mosquito vectors in southeastern Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6, e1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Migné, C.V.; Moutailler, S.; Attoui, H. Strategies for Assessing Arbovirus Genetic Variability in Vectors and/or Mammals. Pathogens 2020, 9, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gibb, R.; Redding, D.W.; Chin, K.Q.; Donnelly, C.A.; Blackburn, T.M.; Newbold, T.; Jones, K.E. Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems. Nature 2020, 584, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. García-Romero, C.; Carrillo Bilbao, G.A.; Navarro, J.-C.; Martin-Solano, S.; Saegerman, C. Arboviruses in Mammals in the Neotropics: A Systematic Review to Strengthen Epidemiological Monitoring Strategies and Conservation Medicine. Viruses 2023, 15, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dobson, A.P.; Pimm, S.L.; Hannah, L.; Kaufman, L.; Ahumada, J.A.; Ando, A.W.; Bernstein, A.; Busch, J.; Daszak, P.; Engelmann, J.; et al. Ecology and economics for pandemic prevention. Science 2020, 369, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adewale, V.O.; Adekunle, A.J.; Tahiru, I.K.; David, O.O. Influence of Meteorological Variables on Diversity and Abundance of Mosquito Vectors in Two Livestock Farms in Ibadan, Nigeria: Public Health Implications. J. Mosq. Res. 2017, 7, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chaves, B.A.; Orfano, A.S.; Nogueira, P.M.; Rodrigues, N.B.; Campolina, T.B.; Nacif-Pimenta, R.; Pires, A.C.A.M.; Júnior, A.B.V.; Paz, A.D.C.; Vaz, E.B.D.C.; et al. Coinfection with Zika Virus (ZIKV) and Dengue Virus Results in Preferential ZIKV Transmission by Vector Bite to Vertebrate Host. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 13, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fraiture, M.-A.; Coucke, W.; Pol, M.; Rousset, D.; Gourinat, A.-C.; Biron, A.; Broeders, S.; Vandermassen, E.; Dupont-Rouzeyrol, M.; Roosens, N.H. Non-Invasive versus Invasive Samples for Zika Virus Surveillance: A Comparative Study in New Caledonia and French Guiana in 2015–2016. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. dos Santos Fonseca, L.M.; Carvalho, R.H.; Bandeira, A.C.; Sardi, S.I.; Campos, G.S. Oropouche Virus Detection in Febrile Patients’Saliva and Urine Samples in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Jn. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 73, 164–165. [Google Scholar]
  36. Milich, K.M.; Koestler, B.J.; Simmons, J.H.; Nehete, P.N.; Di Fiore, A.; Williams, L.E.; Dudley, J.P.; Vanchiere, J.; Payne, S.M. Methods for detecting Zika virus in feces: A case study in captive squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oliveira, T.; Trigo, T.; Tortato, M.; Paviolo, A.; Bianchi, R.; Leite-Pitman, M.R.P. Leopardus guttulus. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; International Union for Conservation of Nature: Gland, Switzerland, 2016; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  38. Oliveira, T.G. Ecologia e Conservação de Pequenos Felinos no Brasil e suas Implicações para o Manejo. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2011; 204p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kitchener, A.; Breitenmoser, C.; Eizirik, E.; Gentry, A.; Werdelin, L.; Wilting, A.; Yamaguchi, N.; Abramov, A.; Christiansen, P.; Driscoll, C.; et al. A revised taxonomy of the Felidae. In Cat News; The Final Report of the Cat Classification Task Force of the IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group; IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group (CSG): Vermillion, SD, USA, 2017; 80p. [Google Scholar]
  40. Trigo, T.C.; Tirelli, F.P.; Machado, L.F.; Peters, F.B.; Indrusiak, C.B.; Mazim, F.D.; Sana, D.; Eizirik, E.; de Freitas, T.R.O. Geographic distribution and food habits of Leopardus tigrinus and L. geoffroyi (Carnivora, Felidae) at their geographic contact zone in southern Brazil. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2013, 48, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rinaldi, A.R.; Rodriguez, F.H.; Carvalho, A.L.; Passos, F.C. Alimentação de pequenos felídeos neotropicais (Felidae: Carnivora) e sobreposição de nicho trófico na paisagem mosaico antropizada no sul do Brasil. Biotemas 2015, 28, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seibert, J.B.; Moreira, D.; Mendes, S.L.; Gatti, A. Diet of two sympatric felids (Leopardus guttulus and Leopardus wiedii) in a remnant of Atlantic forest, in the montane region of Espírito Santo, southeastern Brazil. Bol. Do Mus. Biol. Mello Leitão 2015, 37, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  43. de Souza, W.M.; Fumagalli, M.J.; de Araujo, J.; Sabino-Santos, G.; Maia, F.G.M.; Farignoli Romeiro, M.F.; Modha, S.; Nardi, M.S.; Queiroz, L.H.; Durigon, E.L.; et al. Discovery of novel anelloviruses in small mammals expands the host range and diversity of the Anelloviridae. Virology 2018, 514, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kraberger, S.; Opriessnig, T.; Celer, V.; Maggi, F.; Okamoto, H.; Blomström, A.-L.; Cadar, D.; Harrach, B.; Biagini, P.; Varsani, A. Taxonomic updates for the genus Gyrovirus (family Anelloviridae): Recognition of several new members and establishment of species demarcation criteria. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166, 2937–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The collection locations of the animals included in this study can be seen in the municipalities of Campo Bom (Orange), Dois Irmãos (Yellow), Novo Hamburgo (Lime Green) and Rolante (Green), as indicated on the map of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS).
Figure 1. The collection locations of the animals included in this study can be seen in the municipalities of Campo Bom (Orange), Dois Irmãos (Yellow), Novo Hamburgo (Lime Green) and Rolante (Green), as indicated on the map of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS).
Pathogens 14 00310 g001
Figure 2. Number of viral genus identified. Horizontal bars represent the total number of genera identified by species, while vertical bars indicate the number of genera shared between the animal species. This visualization highlights the overlap and uniqueness of viral genera detected. Graphic done at RStudio version: 2024.12.1, leveraging the ‘UpSetR’ library.
Figure 2. Number of viral genus identified. Horizontal bars represent the total number of genera identified by species, while vertical bars indicate the number of genera shared between the animal species. This visualization highlights the overlap and uniqueness of viral genera detected. Graphic done at RStudio version: 2024.12.1, leveraging the ‘UpSetR’ library.
Pathogens 14 00310 g002
Figure 3. Demonstration of the viral families present in the rectal samples of D. albiventris, as well as the percentage of each in the evaluated pools.
Figure 3. Demonstration of the viral families present in the rectal samples of D. albiventris, as well as the percentage of each in the evaluated pools.
Pathogens 14 00310 g003
Figure 4. Demonstration of the viral families present in the oral samples of D. albiventris, as well as the percentage of each in the evaluated pools.
Figure 4. Demonstration of the viral families present in the oral samples of D. albiventris, as well as the percentage of each in the evaluated pools.
Pathogens 14 00310 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap illustrating the relative abundance and distribution of viral families identified across the analyzed animal species. The heatmap was generated using Microsoft Excel 2501. Viral families are listed on the y-axis, while the x-axis displays the corresponding animal hosts. The color intensity represents the number of viral hits detected for each family within each species, ranging from light beige (representing a minimum of 1 hit) to dark red (representing a maximum of 10,084 hits). The frequency of occurrence of each viral family among the studied species ranged from 1 to 21 occurrences. This analysis highlights the diversity and prevalence of viral families across different vertebrate hosts as determined by metagenomic sequencing.
Figure 5. Heatmap illustrating the relative abundance and distribution of viral families identified across the analyzed animal species. The heatmap was generated using Microsoft Excel 2501. Viral families are listed on the y-axis, while the x-axis displays the corresponding animal hosts. The color intensity represents the number of viral hits detected for each family within each species, ranging from light beige (representing a minimum of 1 hit) to dark red (representing a maximum of 10,084 hits). The frequency of occurrence of each viral family among the studied species ranged from 1 to 21 occurrences. This analysis highlights the diversity and prevalence of viral families across different vertebrate hosts as determined by metagenomic sequencing.
Pathogens 14 00310 g005
Figure 6. Chikungunya virus maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis, tree model GTR+F+I, conducted using the IQ-TREE v1.6.12 web server, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sample sequences with whole genome and sized to 11778 to 11865 pb. Sample sequences submitted to GISAID platform. Note: AC—Asian and Caribbean Genotype; WA—West African Genotype; ECSA: East-Central-South Africa Genotype.
Figure 6. Chikungunya virus maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis, tree model GTR+F+I, conducted using the IQ-TREE v1.6.12 web server, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sample sequences with whole genome and sized to 11778 to 11865 pb. Sample sequences submitted to GISAID platform. Note: AC—Asian and Caribbean Genotype; WA—West African Genotype; ECSA: East-Central-South Africa Genotype.
Pathogens 14 00310 g006
Figure 7. L. guttulus Anelloviridae virus Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis performed in IQ-TREE v1.6.12 web server, applying 1000 replicates, tree model TPM2u+F+G4 and sample size with 1491pb. Sequences retrieved from NCBI Nucleotide. Sample sequence submitted to NCBI Nucleotide platform under accession number PV112431.1.
Figure 7. L. guttulus Anelloviridae virus Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis performed in IQ-TREE v1.6.12 web server, applying 1000 replicates, tree model TPM2u+F+G4 and sample size with 1491pb. Sequences retrieved from NCBI Nucleotide. Sample sequence submitted to NCBI Nucleotide platform under accession number PV112431.1.
Pathogens 14 00310 g007
Table 1. Municipalities and locations where the animals were collected, as well as the number of individuals collected for each species.
Table 1. Municipalities and locations where the animals were collected, as well as the number of individuals collected for each species.
Total Number
of Samples
Animals CollectedCommon NameSpeciesGeographic
Coordinates
Location
Oral SwabsRectal Swabs
-01/0101NutriaMyocastor coypus−29.761097
−51.042227
Novo
Hamburgo
-01/0101Atlantic Forest tiger-catLeopardus guttulus−29.6273186
−51.1128742
Dois Irmãos
01/0101/0101White-tufted-ear MarmosetCallithrix jacchus−29.688729
−51.108325
Novo
Hamburgo
01/0101/0101Ihering’s Three-striped OpossumMonodelphis iheringi−29.652316
−50.576316
Rolante
01/0101/0101Small wild rodentBrucepattersonius iheringi−29.652316
−50.576316
Rolante
01/0101/0101Small wild rodentThaptomys nigrita−29.652316
−50.576316
Rolante
01/0101/0101Small wild rodentSooretamys angouya−29.652316
−50.576316
Rolante
01/0101/0101BatEptesicus furinalis−29.769097
−50.964491
Novo
Hamburgo
01/0101/0101BatLasiurus blossevillii−29.769097
−50.964491
Novo
Hamburgo
04/1717/1717BatMolossus molossus−29.7215628
−51.0180754
Novo
Hamburgo
15/1515/1515Small wild rodentAkodon montensis−29.7407319
−51.0523446
Novo
Hamburgo
01/0404/0404PorcupineCoendou spinosus
(a)
−29.688729
−51.108325
(b)
−29.681395
−51.109275
(a)
Novo Hamburgo
(b)
Campo Bom
06/4343/4343OpossumDidelphis
Albiventris
−29.688729
−51.108325
Novo
Hamburgo
Table 2. Viral classes and families by species and kind of swab. The phages are separated below the table.
Table 2. Viral classes and families by species and kind of swab. The phages are separated below the table.
SpeciesViral Class/FamilySwab
Didelphis albiventrisAutographiviridaeRectal/Oral
TogaviridaeRectal
CoronaviridaeRectal/Oral
Retroviridae
FlaviviridaeRectal
OrthoherpesviridaeRectal/Oral
Pneumoviridae
AdenoviridaeRectal
SmacoviridaeRectal
Coendou spinosusTogaviridaeRectal/Oral
Retroviridae
Leopardus guttulusAnelloviridaeRectal
Dicistoviridae
Parvoviridae
Eptesicus furinalisRetroviridaeOral
Sooretamys angouyaRetroviridaeOral
Brucepattersonius iheringiRetroviridaeOral
Monodelphis iheringiRoboviriaRectal
OrthomyxoviridaeOral
Akodon montensisTogaviridaeRectal/Oral
Retroviridae
Marseilleviridae
AutographiviridaeOral
AdenoviridaeOral
Molossus molossusOrthoherpesviridaeRectal
Retroviridae
Coronaviridae
Lasiurus blossevilliiCoronaviridaeOral
SpeciesPhage Family or ClassSwab
Didelphis albiventrisMicroviridaeRectal
CaudovirecetesRectal/Oral
SteigviridaeRectal
SchitoviridaeRectal/Oral
Herelleviridae
Peduoviridae
Chimalliviridae
Straboviridae
SuoliviridaeRectal
Coendou spinosusCaudovirecetesRectal/Oral
Leopardus guttulusMicroviridaeRectal
Casjensviridae
Sooretamys angouyaCaudovirecetesOral
Thaptomys nigritaCaudovirecetesRectal
Peduoviridae
Callithrix jacchusCaudovirecetesRectal/Oral
Monodelphis iheringiCaudovirecetesRectal/Oral
Akodon montensisStraboviridaeOral
PeduoviridaeRectal/Oral
Caudovirecetes
Molossus molossusCaudovirecetesRectal/Oral
Microviridae
Table 3. Metagenomics data of the ChikV samples.
Table 3. Metagenomics data of the ChikV samples.
Depth CovergeCoverage (%)ReadsContigsSwabSpecie
9.798.9212142RectalCoendou spinosus
8.698.4810971RectalCoendou spinosus
74.899.310,0841RectalAkodon montensis
11.598.714731OralAkodon montensis
15.598.6420541RectalAkodon montensis
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matos, J.S.S.; Demoliner, M.; Gularte, J.S.; Filippi, M.; de Abreu Góes Pereira, V.M.; da Silva, M.S.; Weber, M.N.; de Barros, M.P.; Spilki, F.R. Virome of Terrestrial Mammals and Bats from Southern Brazil: Circulation of New Putative Members of the Togaviridae Family and Other Findings. Pathogens 2025, 14, 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040310

AMA Style

Matos JSS, Demoliner M, Gularte JS, Filippi M, de Abreu Góes Pereira VM, da Silva MS, Weber MN, de Barros MP, Spilki FR. Virome of Terrestrial Mammals and Bats from Southern Brazil: Circulation of New Putative Members of the Togaviridae Family and Other Findings. Pathogens. 2025; 14(4):310. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matos, Julyana Sthéfanie Simões, Meriane Demoliner, Juliana Schons Gularte, Micheli Filippi, Vyctoria Malayhka de Abreu Góes Pereira, Mariana Soares da Silva, Matheus Nunes Weber, Marcelo Pereira de Barros, and Fernando Rosado Spilki. 2025. "Virome of Terrestrial Mammals and Bats from Southern Brazil: Circulation of New Putative Members of the Togaviridae Family and Other Findings" Pathogens 14, no. 4: 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040310

APA Style

Matos, J. S. S., Demoliner, M., Gularte, J. S., Filippi, M., de Abreu Góes Pereira, V. M., da Silva, M. S., Weber, M. N., de Barros, M. P., & Spilki, F. R. (2025). Virome of Terrestrial Mammals and Bats from Southern Brazil: Circulation of New Putative Members of the Togaviridae Family and Other Findings. Pathogens, 14(4), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop