Next Article in Journal
Analyses on the Infection Process of Rice Virus and the Spatiotemporal Expression Pattern of Host Defense Genes Based on a Determined-Part Inoculation Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Infection and In-Contact Transmission of H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus in Crows
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Humans and Food-Producing Animals in West Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Genome Plasticity of African Swine Fever Virus: Implications for Diagnostics and Live-Attenuated Vaccines

Scientific Liaison Services Section, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, New York, NY 11957, USA
Pathogens 2022, 11(2), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020145
Submission received: 5 January 2022 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published: 24 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious transboundary viral hemorrhagic disease of domestic and wild pigs presenting a significant threat to the global swine industry. Following its introduction in Caucasus, Georgia, in 2007, the genome of the genotype II of African swine fever virus (ASFV) strain Georgia-07 and its derivatives accumulated significant mutations, resulting in the emergence of genetic variants within short epidemiological timescales as it spreads and infects different hosts in diverse ecosystems, causing outbreaks in Europe, South Asia, South East Asia and the Caribbean. This suggests that ASFV, with a comparatively large and complex DNA genome, is susceptible to genetic mutations including deletions and that although the virus is environmentally stable, it is genetically unstable. This has implications for the development of vaccines and diagnostic tests for disease detection and surveillance. Analysis of the ASFV genome revealed recombination hotspots, which in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses represent key drivers of genetic diversity. The ability of pox virus, a dsDNA virus with a genome complexity similar to ASFV, regaining virulence following the deletion of a virulence gene via gene amplification, coupled with the recent emergence and spread of live-attenuated ASFV vaccine strains causing disease and death in pigs in China, raise legitimate concerns around the use of live-attenuated ASFV vaccines in non-endemic regions to control the potential introduction. Further research into the risk of using live-attenuated ASFV in non-endemic regions is highly needed.

Opinion

DNA viruses have been traditionally considered a group of viral pathogens whose genomes are stable and less susceptible to high spontaneous mutation rates. However, the widespread use of whole genome sequencing is increasingly revealing the accumulation of genetic variation in DNA genomes between population samples taken at different times. Although mutation rates and genome sizes tend to be inversely related, it has become evident that slow-evolving pathogens can accumulate variation throughout their larger genomes on a timescale comparable to that observed for RNA viruses [1]. Molecular evolutionary analyses revealed that large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses can indeed evolve quickly. An analysis of samples of African swine fever virus (ASFV) spanning 70 years revealed estimated evolution rates in the order of 10−4 substitutions per nucleotide per year, a value within the typical range exhibited by many RNA viruses [2]. This may provide a plausible explanation for the detection of multiple genetic variants of ASFV genotype II within short epidemiological timescales in outbreaks in China (within 2–3 years since 2018; [3]), South East Asia and Europe [4,5,6]. In fact, whole genomes of many bacterial and dsDNA genomes sequenced to date have been shown to accumulate novel mutations over timeframes of days to months, similar to those typically observed in RNA viruses [1]. Average intervals between transmission and nucleotide substitution events; i.e., when a novel mutation is observed, are determined to be months for dsDNA viruses, such as smallpox virus, days for HIV and Influenza A virus (H1N1) and a few years for Mycobacterium bovis [1,7,8,9]. This suggests that ASFV with a comparatively large and complex genome is susceptible to accumulating genetic mutations as it spreads and transmits within different host populations in different ecological environments. Together, and with the continuing identification of novel ASFV genotypes (24 p72 genotypes at present) in regions of endemicity in sub-Saharan Africa, where the virus is maintained through complex domestic and sylvatic transmission cycles provides an additional indication that ASFV, despite its ability to survive in different environmental matrices, such as feed [10], carcasses [11] and soil [12], is genetically unstable.
Although DNA viruses are generally reported to display low mutation rates largely due to their encoded high-fidelity DNA proofreading repair enzymes, the per-site evolutionary rate among complex dsDNA viruses can vary significantly along their genomes [13,14]. In fact, ASFV genomes uniquely encode the only known X-type polymerase (X Pol) and a DNA ligase with each exhibiting low fidelity [15,16]. The in vitro fidelity of the ASFV DNA ligase is, at present, the lowest known, whereas the genetic and phenotypic basis for the wide antigenic diversity exhibited by ASFV strains is yet to be determined [17,18,19]. However, the high level of antigenic diversity in field isolates is postulated to arise from the activity of the X Pol/DNA ligase, and some investigators have hypothesized that the X Pol-ligase system functions as a strategic DNA mutator in the base excision repair pathway, where rapid genetic drift occurs due to elevated DNA repair-based error [15,20,21]. With the lack of strong empirical knowledge about the fidelity of the ASFV DNA polymerase, in-depth studies into the mechanisms of DNA repair and DNA polymerase fidelity in ASFV are required in order to better understand ASFV genome plasticity and microevolution, which would enhance our capacity to develop efficacious vaccines and accurate diagnostic tests for disease detection and surveillance. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is routinely used for disease surveillance and in conjunction with PCR for establishing population freedom from infection and facilitating international movement of animals. Commercially manufactured as well as Office International des Epizooties (OIE)-validated ELISAs using semi-purified p72 or a recombinant protein of p30, p54, pp62 and p72 have been developed in indirect and competitive formats [22]. Although, positive ELISA tests, especially in non-endemic countries, should be validated by a secondary confirmatory test, such as an immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) or immunoperoxidase test (IPT) [22,23]. Additionally, validated real-time PCR assays for detecting ASFV have been developed [24,25,26,27,28]. All these PCR assays target conserved regions of the viral p72 gene and appear to be capable of detecting all known ASFV genotypes. However, given the plasticity of the ASFV genome, molecular surveillance to monitor the conservation of diagnostic target sequences coupled with routine evaluation of the sensitivity of diagnostic tests in partnership with laboratories in endemic countries should be supported and carried out.
Next generation sequencing has provided the opportunity to perform a detailed analysis of whole genome sequences of ASFVs responsible for recent outbreaks around the world. The sensitivity of the analytical methods and pipelines could identify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants in outbreaks occurring within short epidemiological timescales. For example, since the first reported introduction of ASFV in Georgia in 2007, this genotype II variant has evolved over time into multiple genetic subvariants as it spread, causing outbreaks in Russia (2007), the Baltic States (2014), Poland (2014), Belgium (2018), China (2018), Vietnam (2019), Cambodia (2019), North Korea (2019), Mongolia (2019) and Germany (2020), and most recently in the Dominican Republic (2021) [29]. The parent Georgia 2007 isolate has since accumulated mutations, including potentially attenuating mutations, that could result in the emergence of less virulent variants (Wu et al., 2020) causing atypical or chronic infections that may potentially be missed by passive surveillance systems. It is hypothesized that these genetic mutations occur as an adaptive microevolution due to selection pressure as the virus replicates and infects different hosts in different agroecological environments. Indeed, intra-epidemic ASFV genome sequence variants have been characterized in outbreaks in Georgia [19] and China [3], providing additional insight into ASFV genome instability during natural infection. These observations provide a basis to postulate that the emergence or detection of multiple p72 genotype II variants within a short epidemiological timescale in recent outbreaks is the result of virus microevolution and (or by) adapting to new hosts and environments.
Molecular analyses of the ASFV genome revealed that the X64R, EP152R, EP153R, EP402R, EP364R and CP2475L genes are located in regions with very high genetic diversity [8], and it is known that gene regions that are associated with antigenic drift typically exhibit higher genetic diversity. A high level of variability is observed within the 35 kb at the 3′ end and the 15 kb at the 5′ end of the genome (170–190 kb) [30,31,32]. These two regions contain the multigene families (MGFs), which vary in number between isolates and give competence for virus variability by gene homologous recombination [19]. Variability is reported to also be generated by a change in the number of amino acid repeats, including the envelope protein p54 encoded by the E183L gene [33]. Indeed, a phylogenetic analysis suggests that recombination is a key driver of genetic diversity in dsDNA viruses, and ASFV genomes have shown more indel mutations than point base substitutions, which could be the result of ectopic homologous recombination, replication slippage, or retrotransposition [34]. These, coupled with the identification of recombination hotspots in the ASFV genome [8] and the characterization of recombinant ASFV variants among Italian and South African isolates [2], further add to the mounting evidence of the high genome plasticity of ASFV.
With the urgency to develop a protective ASF vaccine, several live-attenuated vaccine candidates have been developed [35,36] and are based on modifications to the genome of ASFV genotype II and, to a lesser extent, genotype I strains. Theoretically, ASF live-attenuated vaccines are engineered via the deletion of genes associated with viral virulence, host range and/or immunomodulation and include constructs with deletions of DP148R, thymidine kinase (TK), NL (DP71L), 9GL (B119L), 1177L, CD2v, UK and multiple members of multigene families 360 and 505 (MGF 360/505) [35,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. However, concern regarding the potential risk for their use in non-endemic regions has been reported [46]. This concern is exacerbated by the emergence and spread of live-attenuated ASFV vaccine strains causing disease and death in pigs in China [47]—a development that provides further insight into possible genome instability of ASFV. Empirical evidence shows that double-stranded DNA viruses indeed exhibit genome instability. For example, next generation sequencing revealed herpes simplex virus laboratory samples exhibited new mutations after few transfers [48], further questioning the long-believed genetic stability of DNA viruses. The inverted terminal repeats of vaccinia virus genome are known to experience rapid changes in size, with diversity required in these regions for immune escape and for establishing infection in new hosts. This requirement is necessitated by variability in host-specific selective pressure exerted by host immunity [49]. Similarly, the plasticity of the poxvirus genome (a dsDNA genome with close similarity to the ASFV genome) was demonstrated for K3L and E3L virulence proteins [50,51]. When a vaccinia virus deleted for E3L in order to impose a strong selection pressure favoring gain-of-function mutations in the other protein kinase R suppressor, K3L [52], the virus became adapted to this deletion by increasing the copy number of the K3L gene, expanding its genome size by 10% in order to maintain its host virulence [52]. Low-frequency variants in the viral population carrying recombination breakpoints were suggested as the most likely triggers of these genomic expansion. Interestingly, the ASFV genome has been shown to harbor recombination hot spots [8] and inverted terminal repeats [53] and with a genome size, complexity and structural features similar to poxviruses, raises reasonable concern for vaccine safety [35] and potential reversion to virulence [46] through an unknown but similar mechanism of compensatory gene amplification for ASFV deletion mutants used as live attenuated vaccines in China and elsewhere in South Asia. Furthermore, the detection of ASFV genotype II variants harboring multiple natural mutations or deletions in recent disease outbreaks in China [54], the Dominican Republic and West Africa (Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory/APHIS, unpublished data) presents potential challenges for development of a protective vaccine against this highly devastating transboundary disease. While the likelihood for the occurrence of gene amplification may be speculative, research and the application of state-of-the-art high-resolution next generation sequencing and analysis algorithms in molecular epidemiological investigations provide unique opportunities to determine if such a phenomenon occurs.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Suelee Robbe-Austerman, Gleeson Murphy, Freeda Isaac, Elizabeth Lautner, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Diagnostics and Biologics, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and the United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA) for their comments; however, the views expressed here are my own, and I am responsible for any misinterpretations or errors. I thank members of the Scientific Liaison Services Section (SLSS), the Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, APHIS and USDA for their efficient support to ASFV genomic sequencing and surveillance.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biek, R.; Pybus, O.G.; Lloyd-Smith, J.O.; Didelot, X. Measurably evolving pathogens in the genomic era. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Michaud, V.; Randriamparany, T.; Albina, E. Comprehensive phylogenetic reconstructions of African swine fever virus: Proposal for a new classification and molecular dating of the virus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sun, E.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Huang, L.; Xi, F.; Huangfu, H.; et al. Emergence and prevalence of naturally occurring lower virulent African swine fever viruses in domestic pigs in China in 2020. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dixon, L.K.; Stahl, K.; Jori, F.; Vial, L.; Pfeiffer, D.U. African Swine Fever Epidemiology and Control. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2020, 8, 221–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Denstedt, E.; Porco, A.; Hwang, J.; Nga, N.T.T.; Ngoc, P.T.B.; Chea, S.; Khammavong, K.; Milavong, P.; Sours, S.; Osbjer, K.; et al. Detection of African swine fever virus in free-ranging wild boar in Southeast Asia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 2669–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Truong, A.D.; Ly, D.V.; Vu, T.H.; Hoang, V.T.; Nguyen, T.C.; Chu, T.N.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, T.V.; Pham, N.T.; Tran, H.T.T.; et al. Unexpected cases in field diagnosis of African swine fever virus in Vietnam: The needs consideration when performing molecular diagnostic tests. Open Vet. J. 2020, 10, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Firth, C.; Kitchen, A.; Shapiro, B.; Suchard, M.A.; Holmes, E.C.; Rambaut, A. Using time-structured data to estimate evolutionary rates of double-stranded DNA viruses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 2038–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Li, X.; Xiao, K.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, R.; Shen, X.; Pan, J.; Irwin, D.M.; Chen, R.A.; Shen, Y. The recombination hot spots and genetic diversity of the genomes of African swine fever viruses. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kerr, P.J.; Ghedin, E.; DePasse, J.V.; Fitch, A.; Cattadori, I.M.; Hudson, P.J.; Tscharke, D.C.; Read, A.F.; Holmes, E.C. Evolutionary history and attenuation of myxoma virus on two continents. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Stoian, A.M.M.; Zimmerman, J.; Ji, J.; Hefley, T.J.; Dee, S.; Diel, D.G.; Rowland, R.R.R.; Niederwerder, M.C. Half-Life of African Swine Fever Virus in Shipped Feed. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 2261–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zani, L.; Masiulis, M.; Bušauskas, P.; Dietze, K.; Pridotkas, G.; Globig, A.; Blome, S.; Mettenleiter, T.; Depner, K.; Karvelienė, B. African swine fever virus survival in buried wild boar carcasses. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2086–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carlson, J.; Fischer, M.; Zani, L.; Eschbaumer, M.; Fuchs, W.; Mettenleiter, T.; Beer, M.; Blome, S. Stability of African Swine Fever Virus in Soil and Options to Mitigate the Potential Transmission Risk. Pathogens 2020, 9, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chattopadhyay, S.; Weissman, S.J.; Minin, V.N.; Russo, T.A.; Dykhuizen, D.E.; Sokurenko, E.V. High frequency of hotspot mutations in core genes of Escherichia coli due to short-term positive selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12412–12417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lee, H.; Popodi, E.; Tang, H.; Foster, P.L. Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the bacterium Escherichia coli as determined by whole-genome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2774–E2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Showalter, A.K.; Tsai, M.D. A DNA polymerase with specificity for five base pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1776–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sampoli Benítez, B.A.; Arora, K.; Balistreri, L.; Schlick, T. Mismatched base-pair simulations for ASFV Pol X/DNA complexes help interpret frequent G*G misincorporation. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 384, 1086–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Malogolovkin, A.; Burmakina, G.; Titov, I.; Sereda, A.; Gogin, A.; Baryshnikova, E.; Kolbasov, D. Comparative analysis of African swine fever virus genotypes and serogroups. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. García-Barreno, B.; Sanz, A.; Nogal, M.L.; Viñuela, E.; Enjuanes, L. Monoclonal antibodies of African swine fever virus: Antigenic differences among field virus isolates and viruses passaged in cell culture. J. Virol. 1986, 58, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Farlow, J.; Donduashvili, M.; Kokhreidze, M.; Kotorashvili, A.; Vepkhvadze, N.G.; Kotaria, N.; Gulbani, A. Intra-epidemic genome variation in highly pathogenic African swine fever virus (ASFV) from the country of Georgia. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lamarche, B.J.; Showalter, A.K.; Tsai, M.D. An error-prone viral DNA ligase. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 8408–8417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lamarche, B.J.; Tsai, M.D. Contributions of an endonuclease IV homologue to DNA repair in the African swine fever virus. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 2790–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sanchez-Vizcaino, J.M. African swine fever (infection with African swine fever virus). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, 8th ed.; Office International des Epizooties: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Beltran-Alcrudo, D.G.; Gallardo, A.M.; Kramer, E. African Swine Fever: Detection and Diagnosis—A Manual for Veterinarians, 19th ed.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. King, D.P.; Reid, S.M.; Hutchings, G.H.; Grierson, S.S.; Wilkinson, P.J.; Dixon, L.K.; Bastos, A.D.; Drew, T.W. Development of a TaqMan PCR assay with internal amplification control for the detection of African swine fever virus. J. Virol. Methods 2003, 107, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zsak, L.; Borca, M.V.; Risatti, G.R.; Zsak, A.; French, R.A.; Lu, Z.; Kutish, G.F.; Neilan, J.G.; Callahan, J.D.; Nelson, W.M.; et al. Preclinical diagnosis of African swine fever in contact-exposed swine by a real-time PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tignon, M.; Gallardo, C.; Iscaro, C.; Hutet, E.; Van der Stede, Y.; Kolbasov, D.; De Mia, G.M.; Le Potier, M.F.; Bishop, R.P.; Arias, M.; et al. Development and inter-laboratory validation study of an improved new real-time PCR assay with internal control for detection and laboratory diagnosis of African swine fever virus. J. Virol. Methods 2011, 178, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Haines, F.J.; Hofmann, M.A.; King, D.P.; Drew, T.W.; Crooke, H.R. Development and validation of a multiplex, real-time RT PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of classical and African swine fever viruses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gallardo, C.; Fernández-Pinero, J.; Arias, M. African swine fever (ASF) diagnosis, an essential tool in the epidemiological investigation. Virus Res. 2019, 271, 197676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gonzales, W.; Moreno, C.; Duran, U.; Henao, N.; Bencosme, M.; Lora, P.; Reyes, R.; Núñez, R.; De Gracia, A.; Perez, A.M. African swine fever in the Dominican Republic. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 3018–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Blasco, R.; Agüero, M.; Almendral, J.M.; Viñuela, E. Variable and constant regions in African swine fever virus DNA. Virology 1989, 168, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wesley, R.D.; Tuthil, A.E. Genome relatedness among African swine fever virus field isolates by restriction endonuclease analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984, 2, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Blasco, R.; de la Vega, I.; Almazán, F.; Agüero, M.; Viñuela, E. Genetic variation of African swine fever virus: Variable regions near the ends of the viral DNA. Virology 1989, 173, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, H.; Jacobs, S.C.; Smith, G.L.; Dixon, L.K.; Parkhouse, R.M. African swine fever virus gene j13L encodes a 25-27 kDa virion protein with variable numbers of amino acid repeats. J. Gen. Virol. 1995, 76 Pt 5, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, Z.; Xiao, C.T.; Fan, Y.; Cai, Z.; Lu, C.; Zhang, G.; Jiang, T.; Tan, Y.; Peng, Y. Homologous recombination shapes the genetic diversity of African swine fever viruses. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 236, 108380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. O’Donnell, V.; Holinka, L.G.; Gladue, D.P.; Sanford, B.; Krug, P.W.; Lu, X.; Arzt, J.; Reese, B.; Carrillo, C.; Risatti, G.R.; et al. African Swine Fever Virus Georgia Isolate Harboring Deletions of MGF360 and MGF505 Genes Is Attenuated in Swine and Confers Protection against Challenge with Virulent Parental Virus. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 6048–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gladue, D.P.; O’Donnell, V.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Rai, A.; Pruitt, S.; Vuono, E.A.; Silva, E.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Borca, M.V. Deletion of CD2-Like (CD2v) and C-Type Lectin-Like (EP153R) Genes from African Swine Fever Virus Georgia-∆9GL Abrogates Its Effectiveness as an Experimental Vaccine. Viruses 2020, 12, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zsak, L.; Lu, Z.; Kutish, G.F.; Neilan, J.G.; Rock, D.L. An African swine fever virus virulence-associated gene NL-S with similarity to the herpes simplex virus ICP34.5 gene. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 8865–8871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Moore, D.M.; Zsak, L.; Neilan, J.G.; Lu, Z.; Rock, D.L. The African swine fever virus thymidine kinase gene is required for efficient replication in swine macrophages and for virulence in swine. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 10310–10315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lewis, T.; Zsak, L.; Burrage, T.G.; Lu, Z.; Kutish, G.F.; Neilan, J.G.; Rock, D.L. An African swine fever virus ERV1-ALR homologue, 9GL, affects virion maturation and viral growth in macrophages and viral virulence in swine. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. O’Donnell, V.; Holinka, L.G.; Krug, P.W.; Gladue, D.P.; Carlson, J.; Sanford, B.; Alfano, M.; Kramer, E.; Lu, Z.; Arzt, J.; et al. African Swine Fever Virus Georgia 2007 with a Deletion of Virulence-Associated Gene 9GL (B119L), when Administered at Low Doses, Leads to Virus Attenuation in Swine and Induces an Effective Protection against Homologous Challenge. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 8556–8566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. O’Donnell, V.; Risatti, G.R.; Holinka, L.G.; Krug, P.W.; Carlson, J.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Azzinaro, P.A.; Gladue, D.P.; Borca, M.V. Simultaneous Deletion of the 9GL and UK Genes from the African Swine Fever Virus Georgia 2007 Isolate Offers Increased Safety and Protection against Homologous Challenge. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01760-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Reis, A.L.; Goatley, L.C.; Jabbar, T.; Sanchez-Cordon, P.J.; Netherton, C.L.; Chapman, D.A.G.; Dixon, L.K. Deletion of the African Swine Fever Virus Gene DP148R Does Not Reduce Virus Replication in Culture but Reduces Virus Virulence in Pigs and Induces High Levels of Protection against Challenge. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01428-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Borca, M.V.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Silva, E.; Vuono, E.; Rai, A.; Pruitt, S.; Holinka, L.G.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Zhu, J.; Gladue, D.P. Development of a Highly Effective African Swine Fever Virus Vaccine by Deletion of the I177L Gene Results in Sterile Immunity against the Current Epidemic Eurasia Strain. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e02017-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, W.; Zhao, D.; He, X.; Liu, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, F.; Shan, D.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. A seven-gene-deleted African swine fever virus is safe and effective as a live attenuated vaccine in pigs. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Teklue, T.; Wang, T.; Luo, Y.; Hu, R.; Sun, Y.; Qiu, H.J. Generation and Evaluation of an African Swine Fever Virus Mutant with Deletion of the CD2v and UK Genes. Vaccines 2020, 8, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Fan, S.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Yi, L.; Ding, H.; Zhao, M.; Chen, J. Current State of Global African Swine Fever Vaccine Development under the Prevalence and Transmission of ASF in China. Vaccines 2020, 8, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reuters. New China Swine Fever Strains Point to Unlicensed Vaccines. Healthc. Pharma 2021. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-swinefever-vaccines-insight/new-china-swine-fever-strains-point-to-unlicensed-vaccines-idUSKBN29R00X (accessed on 5 January 2022).
  48. Szpara, M.L.; Tafuri, Y.R.; Parsons, L.; Shamim, S.R.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Legendre, M.; Enquist, L.W. A wide extent of inter-strain diversity in virulent and vaccine strains of alphaherpesviruses. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Sanjuan, R.; Pereira-Gomez, M.; Risso, J. Genome instability in DNA viruses. In Genome Stability: From Virus to Human Application, 2nd ed.; Kovalchuk, I., Kovalchuk, O., Eds.; Translational Epigenetics Series; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Volume 26, pp. 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  50. Elde, N.C.; Child, S.J.; Geballe, A.P.; Malik, H.S. Protein kinase R reveals an evolutionary model for defeating viral mimicry. Nature 2009, 457, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rothenburg, S.; Seo, E.J.; Gibbs, J.S.; Dever, T.E.; Dittmar, K. Rapid evolution of protein kinase PKR alters sensitivity to viral inhibitors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Elde, N.C.; Child, S.J.; Eickbush, M.T.; Kitzman, J.O.; Rogers, K.S.; Shendure, J.; Geballe, A.P.; Malik, H.S. Poxviruses deploy genomic accordions to adapt rapidly against host antiviral defenses. Cell 2012, 150, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. de la Vega, I.; González, A.; Blasco, R.; Calvo, V.; Viñuela, E. Nucleotide sequence and variability of the inverted terminal repetitions of African swine fever virus DNA. Virology 1994, 201, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pig Progress. ASF China: Mutations Confirmed by Chinese Scientists. 2021. Available online: https://www.pigprogress.net/Health/Articles/2021/3/ASF-China-Mutations-confirmed-by-Chinese-scientists-715566E/ (accessed on 5 January 2022).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faburay, B. Genome Plasticity of African Swine Fever Virus: Implications for Diagnostics and Live-Attenuated Vaccines. Pathogens 2022, 11, 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020145

AMA Style

Faburay B. Genome Plasticity of African Swine Fever Virus: Implications for Diagnostics and Live-Attenuated Vaccines. Pathogens. 2022; 11(2):145. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020145

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faburay, Bonto. 2022. "Genome Plasticity of African Swine Fever Virus: Implications for Diagnostics and Live-Attenuated Vaccines" Pathogens 11, no. 2: 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020145

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop