Next Article in Journal
Monitoring Wind-Borne Particle Matter Entering Poultry Farms via the Air-Inlet: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus and Other Pathogens Risk
Previous Article in Journal
IL-10-Secreting CD8+ T Cells Specific for Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV): Generation, Maintenance and Phenotype
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Survey on Limnic Gastropods: Relationships between Human Health and Conservation

by
Paulo R. S. Coelho
1,*,
Fabricio T. O. Ker
2,
Amanda D. Araujo
3,
Hudson A. Pinto
4,
Deborah A. Negrão-Corrêa
5,
Roberta L. Caldeira
3 and
Stefan M. Geiger
1
1
Laboratory of Intestinal Helminthiasis, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Epidemiology of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
3
Research Group on Helminthology and Medical Malacology, René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
4
Laboratory Trematoda Biology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
5
Laboratory of Immunohelminthology and Schistosomiasis, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(12), 1533; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121533
Submission received: 5 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Snail-Borne Diseases)

Abstract

:
The present work aimed to study ecological aspects related to the distribution pattern of medically important and native freshwater mollusks, found in a rural municipality in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Malacological captures were carried out in aquatic environments (lentic and lotic) from 46 locations between October 2018 and September 2019. The collected specimens were subjected to taxonomic identification and evaluation for infection with trematode larvae. Qualitative data were used to analyze the similarity and the odds ratios between the environmental variables. In total, 1125 specimens were sampled, belonging to the following species: Biomphalaria glabrata, B. tenagophila, B. straminea, B. kuhniana, B. cousini, Biomphalaria sp., and Drepanotrema cimex (Planorbidae), Stenophysa marmorata (Physidae), Omalonyx sp. (Succineidae), Pseudosuccinea columella (Lymnaeidae), and Pomacea sp. (Ampullaridae). Echinostome, strigeocercaria, and xiphidiocercaria types of larval trematodes were detected in S. marmorata and D. cimex. Of note was the similarity in the distribution of S. marmorata, a supposedly endangered species, with that of the medically important Biomphalaria species, with the two sharing environments. This complex scenario led us to reflect on and discuss the need for the control of important intermediate hosts, as well as the conservation of endangered species. This relevant issue has not yet been discussed in detail, in Brazil or in other countries that recommend snail control.

1. Introduction

It is estimated that about 4000 species of freshwater gastropods exist in the world [1]. In many ecosystems, these mollusks are important food sources [2] and also contribute to nutrient recycling [3]. As such, freshwater snails are considered excellent bioindicators of environmental quality, present sufficient abundance, and have the ability to adapt to different environments [4]. More importantly, mollusks can act as intermediate hosts of parasitic helminths, including several species of medical or veterinary importance worldwide [5].
Despite the great diversity and importance of these organisms, their distribution is not completely known in most areas of the globe. Thus, the realization of inventories of limnic gastropods is of paramount importance to promote knowledge on the diversity, biology, distribution, and dispersion, and on ecological relationships between populations and communities [6,7,8,9,10]. In this context, surveys can also expand the understanding of medically important species and/or native species.
The related malacological records for diverse freshwater environments, in most cases, have been dedicated to species associated with trematodes of medical and veterinary importance [11,12,13,14], especially the studies on schistosomiasis and fasciolosis. On the other hand, most of the other trematode species reported have complex biological cycles and intermediate mollusk hosts that are still unknown or are described merely in part [11,12].
For these invertebrates, little emphasis has been placed on populations and communities in research designs, and there are only a few scientists who are specialists in this field. However, snails have already been targeted in intervention programs in the African continent, in Central and South America, as well as in East Asia, but there is still much to be discussed about these interventions, before a general recommendation for nationwide control programs can be launched [15,16,17]. An approach that has grown in recent years involves ecological analyses to understand the spatiality of snails and the characterization of their habitats, in order to control diseases caused by trematode parasites [18].
Thus, the present research aimed to study the composition and distribution of freshwater mollusks in the municipality of Alvorada de Minas, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Within this perspective, the identification of the collected specimens, the evaluation of the associated trematodes, and the similarity and relationship between shared environments by the different snail species were evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

The municipality of Alvorada de Minas (18°43′7″ S 43°22′5″ W) is located in the mesoregion of the Metropolitan area of Belo Horizonte and microregion of Conceição do Mato Dentro, 210 km north of the capital of Minas Gerais; it is part of the “Estrada Real” tourist route. The main tributary is the Rio do Peixe river, which is a sub-basin of the Rio Doce River, one of the main hydrographic basins of Minas Gerais.
Freshwater mollusks were collected at 17 sampling sites from 46 investigated locations, representative of lentic and lotic ecosystems of the municipality. The malacological survey was carried out on five occasions: October (spring) in 2018; February (summer), March and May (autumn), and September (winter) in 2019. Snail captures were done by three trained collectors with a sampling effort of 20 min at each sampling point, according to the technique of Olivier and Schneiderman [19], adapted for qualitative analyses. Scoops for snail capture were used, as recommended by the Brazilian Schistosomiasis Control Program (Ministry of Health, 2007). Georeferencing of the collection sites was made with the aid of a portable GPS device (GARMIN GPSMAP 62S).
For the identification of mollusks, morphological data were used that followed the conchological criteria based on specific identification for each species using the references: P. columella (the intermediate hosts of Fasciola hepatica) [20,21]; Pomacea sp.; Physa sp.; Drepanotrema sp. and Omalonyx sp. [22,23]; Stenophysa sp. [24]. For the genus Biomphalaria (the intermediate hosts of Schistosoma mansoni), morphological analyses were performed [25,26] and complemented by molecular methods [27,28]. The mollusks obtained were photographed (LEICA DFC450), and voucher specimens were deposited in the Medical Malacology Collection (CMM) of the René Rachou Institute (IRR) of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz). The field procedures and collections were authorized by the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (SISBIO registration number nº 68627-1).
For the active search of shed cercariae, collected snails were individualized and incubated in small, nonsterile tissue culture plates (24-well, Costar) with filtered and dechlorinated water, and exposed to light of incandescent lamps (60 W) for 4 h [29], except for Omalonyx sp.. The visualization of the cercariae was done with a stereoscopic microscope. Obtained larvae were photographed (LEICA ICC50 HD), and the identification of cercariae was based on morphological criteria, according to [11,30]. Negative snails were crushed to confirm the absence of other larval stages.
For statistical analyses, the frequencies obtained from the categorical data of the environments (lotic and lentic) and the presence of snails were compared using the chi-square test.
Geocoded-based cartography, projection/datum with the SIRGAS 2000 UTM Zone 23S, was used for the spatial distribution of the mollusks. In the QGis, the databases with the municipal limits and census sectors from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and hydrographic mesh from the Mineiro Institute of Water Management (IGAM) were used.
Due to the lack of water management in the municipality, the study area was strategically divided into hydrographic units (HU1 to HU12), considering the characteristics of relief, drainage, land use, the potential for mollusks to spread, and the distribution of sample points. Each hydrographic unit was composed of a main water body (brook) and its upstream tributaries (brook, ponds, lakes, or springs), regardless of whether it flows directly into the Peixe River or into another water body, e.g., HU1, HU2, and HU10. The Peixe River and its small tributaries were considered as a separate hydrographic unit (HU4). Moreover, two hydrographic units (HU1 and HU2) are affluents of the Peixe River, although they are in a neighboring municipality.
The qualitative similarity between the composition of the mollusk specimens and the relationship between the hydrographic units was observed through a simple correlation based on the Jaccard index, which considers the number of species common between two areas (a) and the number of exclusive species from each area (b, c) [31]:
J = 100a/(a + b + c)
Based on this index, a bidirectional analysis was elaborated in the form of a dendrogram, where the grouping is made from the arithmetic mean of the elements and the values of the ordinates express the similarity relations between the objects indicated in the abscissa [32]. For this analysis the software Paleontological statistics (PAST, version 4.10) was used.
In order to elucidate whether there was a relationship between the presence of B. glabrata and the presence of other mollusks, a logistic regression method was used. Logistic regression fits into the general framework of two generalized linear models (GLM) and can be used to analyze the relationship between a binary response variable and one or more explanatory variables [33], from the “presence/absence response curve” of a species [34]. The variables were dichotomized according to the presence or absence of species at the sampling point. Differences with a p-value ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Subsequently, the models were validated through the percentage of correct classification, based on the ROC curve analysis. This statistical analysis was performed using the STATA version 15.1 program (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

The malacological investigation resulted in the registration of different families, frequently identified in water collections of southeastern Brazil [35,36], namely, Planorbidae, Physidae, Succineidae, Lymnaeidae, and Ampullaridae. A total of 1125 specimens of gastropods from 11 species and five families were identified in the water resources of the municipality of Alvorada de Minas. Among the collected snails, 224 were identified as Stenophysa marmorata (Guilding, 1828) (Physidae); 66 as Drepanotrema cimex (Moricand, 1839) (Planorbidae); 44 as Omalonyx d’Orbigny, 1837 (Succinidae); 16 as Pseudosuccinea columella (Say, 1817) (Lymnaeidae); 8 as Pomacea sp. (Ampullaridae); 767 as Biomphalaria (Planorbidae). In the latter case, more detailed data were previously published [37], with the following species identified: Biomphalaria glabrata (Say, 1818), Biomphalaria tenagophila (d’Orbigny, 1835), Biomphalaria straminea (Dunker, 1848), Biomphalaria kuhniana (Clessin, 1883), and Biomphalaria cousini (Paraense, 1966) (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Regarding the intermediate hosts of S. mansoni, causative agent of human intestinal schistosomiasis, previous work identified the presence of B. glabrata and B. straminea in Alvorada de Minas between 2012 and 2014 [38]. In the more recent field work carried out by our group [37], the presence of three main intermediate hosts was confirmed, including the first record of B. tenagophila in the municipality, together with an identification of possible risk areas for schistosomiasis transmission.
In the present survey, the occurrence of P. columella, an intermediate host species of F. hepatica, was recorded for the first time within the borders of the municipality. Fasciolosis is a parasitosis with worldwide distribution in ruminants and it is considered an important veterinary disease, due to considerable economic losses in livestock production [39,40,41]. This malacological record is important since Alvorada de Minas is a region that depends on agriculture and cattle breeding as the main economic activities. Until recently, the occurrence of P. columella had been documented in 40 municipalities in Minas Gerais [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], but had not yet been recorded for Alvorada de Minas. Since fasciolosis is a zoonosis that can also affect humans and can cause serious clinical manifestations in chronically infected individuals [39], the present record might be also of interest in the view of a One Health perspective [35,43]. As such, cases of human fasciolosis have been reported in Brazil in studies from the states of Bahia, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, and from São Paulo [44]. In total, 62 human cases have been confirmed in the past [45].
Another interesting finding of the study was the presence of S. marmorata, corresponding to the species Physa marmorata “Name uncertain”, according to others [25,46,47]. Although the taxonomy presented by Paraense (1986) is outdated, the species Ph. marmorata was included in the 2018 and 2021 list of threatened species by the Ministry of the Environment (MMA) and the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), where it was classified as a “vulnerable” species. Despite being widely distributed throughout the tropical regions of Central America and South America [22], a reduction in the registration of populations was detected during the last decade due to environmental degradation and competition with exotic species [48,49,50,51]. In the present survey, this species was identified in 13 of the 17 locations where freshwater mollusks were found.
The investigation of trematode larvae associated with the collected mollusks revealed the presence of larval stages identified as echinostome and xiphidiocercaria types of cercariae, both shed by S. marmorata (infection rate: 0.89%). In addition, strigeiocercaria were found in two specimens of D. cimex from different localities (Figure 3). These parasites usually parasitize wild amphibians, reptiles, or birds [11], and further studies are required to advance the identification of these trematodes.
The aquatic collections were classified as lentic (stagnant or low water flow, especially lakes and ponds) and lotic (running water, streams, waterfalls, and rivers). Forty-five environments were evaluated, classified into 29 (64.4%) lentic environments and 16 (35.6%) lotic environments. Collection point 41 was not evaluated because it was an animal drinking trough, although it served as an excellent snail breeding site. The frequency in lentic environments was significantly higher (15/29; 51.75%) when compared to lotic environments (1/16; 6.2%) (p = 0.02338) (Table 1). At the collection sites, there was no record of exotic gastropods.
The sampled and described environments corroborated with data from the literature, where different authors reported that gastropods prefer lentic environments and have benthic habits [52,53], although it was also shown that they can colonize lotic environments [13]. Other characteristics such as the absence of riparian vegetation (only small grasses and aquatic vegetation), accentuated erosion, absent odor, visible changes of urban origin, and partially transparent waters were predominant at the sampling points (Figure 4).
Among the twelve hydrographic units of the municipality, there was no record of mollusks in four units (HU2, HU6, HU8, and HU10). Gastropods were recorded in eight hydrographic units (HU1, HU3, HU4, HU5, HU7, HU9, HU11, and HU12), with trematode larvae found in two of them (HU5 and HU9) (Figure 5). Based on Jaccard’s analysis (Tables S2 and S3), bidirectional clustering was observed based on the similarity calculated for the distribution of gastropods. Hydrographic units HU3 and HU12 had a high similarity value, and HU7 and HU11 had low similarity. The low similarity of these environments is due to the occurrence of Omalonyx sp. and B. cousin, which were not recorded in other locations, and the absence of the species B. glabrata and/or S. marmorata. Analyses carried out from the gastropod perspective indicated that 10 of the 11 specimens showed similarity to each other with shared environments, except for B. cousini, which showed a unique value (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
The odds ratio of B. glabrata occurring at a sampling point was 28.8 times higher in the presence of B. kuhniana than in its absence (CI = 2.65–311.93; p = 0.0015; correctly classified = 86.96%; area under ROC curve = 70.87%), and 8.5 times higher in the presence of S. marmorata than in its absence (CI = 1.71–42.95; p = 0.0064; correctly classified = 88.43%; area under ROC curve = 73.87%). Drepanotrema (p = 0.1488) and Pseudosuccinea (p = 0.3222) were not significantly associated, and B. tenagophila, B. straminea, B. cousini, Biomphalaria sp., Omalonyx, and Pomacea were colinear with B. glabrata.
In addition, B. glabrata was the species with the vastest distribution and greatest abundance, followed by S. marmorata (Figure 1). Among these species, in Jaccard’s analysis, a similarity value of 0.75 was observed, compatible with the logistic regression analysis (Table S4) and obtained odds ratio.

4. Discussion

The results represent the municipality’s first freshwater mollusk survey and thus provide data that contribute to the biomonitoring of the freshwater fauna. The variation in sampling efforts at some collection points disabled quantitative, seasonal comparisons about the richness and abundance of species. On the other hand, a variety of mollusk habitats were documented in Alvorada de Minas, where only medically important species had previously been documented.
In this scenario, there was a concurrent occurrence of two snail species, which has been discussed in the literature only to a small degree, e.g., a species of medical importance and an endangered species sharing the same environment. This demonstrates the need for extended malacological surveys to avoid inappropriate interventions, such as those used in the last century for the control of schistosomiasis, with the application of Niclosamide (2-amino ethanol salt of 2′, 5′-dichloro-4′-nitro salicylanilide; Bayluscide®, Bayer, Germany). The control of medically important mollusks has remained an essential component of integrated control programs, but chemical molluscicides are expensive, the application process is complex, and their use can generate major impacts and lethal effects on other organisms due to the lack of selective action [16,54,55,56,57]. In this respect, it is worth mentioning that specimens of S. marmorata, notified by ICMBio as an endangered species, would run the risk of having reduced populations within such interventions of snail control, as recently recommended by the WHO [58,59].
In Brazil, there are 15 species of threatened continental mollusks, classified in three categories (“Critically Endangered”, “Endangered”, or “Vulnerable”) and distributed in 12 Brazilian states, including the State of Minas Gerais, which has S. marmorata listed as a vulnerable species. However, this species received a NatureServe global heritage status rating of G5 (Least Concern). Some parts of their distribution coincide with protected areas [48,49,50,51]. Alvorada de Minas is not included in the Conservation Units, but is surrounded by more than five of them. The municipality is part of the “Central Corridor of Espinhaço”, a mountain range and preservation area of extremely high importance and priority for the conservation of the fauna [60].
In Article 3 of Law No. 5197 (Fauna Law) and for 37 articles of Law No. 9605 (Environmental Crimes Law) for Brazil, it is not a crime to kill wild animals, when it applies to animals harmful for agriculture or public health. However, in terms of a more global reflection of such interventions, the harmfulness of these animals must be characterized by a competent body or institution. In this respect, we believe that it is extremely important to indicate harmfulness regarding a restricted species and population of animals only in a certain region and not apply this to genera, families, or an order or class of animals in general.
These results highlight the importance of extensive malacological surveys for the understanding of mollusk diversity, their association with helminthic parasites, and ecological scenarios. The distribution patterns of limnic gastropods must be well established in order to precisely determine areas with species of medical importance, invasive species, and/or native species. The herein proposed methodology has the potential to be recommended for other qualitative studies of possible control interventions against intermediate hosts, and for monitoring or determination of conservation areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11121533/s1, Table S1: Distribution of limnic gastropods and associated trematodes and their coordinates; Table S2: Jaccard’s analysis for hydrographic units; Table S3: Jaccard’s analysis for the limnic gastropods; Table S4: Logistic regression for Biomphalaria glabrata.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception. Conceptualization, P.R.S.C. and S.M.G.; methodology, P.R.S.C., F.T.O.K., R.L.C. and S.M.G.; software, P.R.S.C.; F.T.O.K. and A.D.A.; validation, P.R.S.C., F.T.O.K., R.L.C. and S.M.G.; formal analysis, P.R.S.C.; F.T.O.K. and A.D.A.; investigation, P.R.S.C. and S.M.G.; field work, P.R.S.C. and S.M.G.; resources, P.R.S.C., DAN, R.L.C. and S.M.G.; data curation, P.R.S.C., F.T.O.K., R.L.C. and S.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.S.C.; F.T.O.K., A.D.A., H.A.P., DAN, R.L.C. and S.M.G.; writing—review and editing, P.R.S.C.; H.A.P., R.L.C. and S.M.G.; visualization, R.L.C., H.A.P., D.A.N.-C. and S.M.G.; supervision, S.M.G.; project administration, P.R.S.C., R.L.C. and S.M.G.; funding acquisition, P.R.S.C., D.A.N.-C., R.L.C. and S.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

P.R.S.C. received a grant from the “Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel- Brazil” (CAPES)—Financial Code 001. The snail studies and molecular analyses were partially funded by the “National Council for Scientific and Technological Development” (CNPq # 308869/2017-6), from the René Rachou Institute—Fiocruz, and from UFMG.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the collaboration of technicians and employees of the local health authorities from Alvorada de Minas, Minas Gerais, especially to Warllem Junio de Oliveira for indicating the municipality for this study. Our many thanks to the Molluscário at UFMG, especially to José Carlos Reis dos Santos, for his attention and help with snail maintenance. To the René Rachou Institute—Fiocruz Minas, Cristiane Lafetá Furtado de Mendonça, curator of Fiocruz-CMM, where the samples of this study were deposited, and to the herpetology laboratory at ICB/UFMG, Paulo Christiano de Anchietta Garcia, for granting the use of documentation equipment for the photographic records of the shells.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Strong, E.E.; Gargominy, O.; Ponder, W.F.; Bouchet, P. Global diversity of gastropods (Gastropoda; Mollusca) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 2008, 595, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maltchik, L.; Stenert, C.; Kotzian, C.; Pereira, D. Responses of freshwater molluscs to environmental factors in Southern Brazil wetlands. Braz. J. Biol. 2010, 70, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Pereira, D.; Inda, L.A.; Consoni, J.M.; Konrad, H.G. Composição e abundância de espécies de moluscos do bentos marginal da microbacia do arroio Capivara, Triunfo, RS, Brasil. Biociências 2001, 9, 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Queiroz, J.F.; Trivinho-Strixino, S.; Nascimento, V.M.D.C. Organismos Bentônicos Bioindicadores da qualidade das Águas da Bacia do Médio São Francisco; Embrapa Meio Ambiente: Jaguariúna, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. Giannelli, A.; Cantacessi, C.; Colella, V.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D. Gastropod-Borne Helminths: A Look at the Snail–Parasite Interplay. Trends Parasitol. 2016, 32, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lydeard, C.; Cowie, R.H.; Ponder, W.F.; Bogan, A.E.; Bouchet, P.; Clark, S.A.; Cummings, K.S.; Frest, T.J.; Gargominy, O.; Herbert, D.G.; et al. The Global Decline of Nonmarine Mollusks. Bioscience 2004, 54, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Amaral, A.C.Z.; Ribeiro, C.V.; Mansur, M.C.D.; Paiva, A.W.E.; Mattews-Cascon, H.; Leite, F.P.P.; de Melo, G.A.S.; Coelho, P.A.; Buckup, L.; Ventura, C.R.R. A situação de ameaça dos invertebrados aquáticos do Brasil. Livro Vermelho Fauna Bras. Ameaçada Extinção 2008, 1, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dos Santos, S.B.; Thiengo, S.C.; Fernandez, M.A.; Miyahira, I.C.; Gonçalves, I.C.B.; Ximenes, R.D.F.; Mansur, M.C.D.; Pereira, D. Espécies de moluscos límnicos invasores no Brasil. Moluscos Límnicos Invasores No Bras. Biol. Prevenção Controle 2012, 25–49. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miyahira, I.C.; Santos, S.B.; Mansur, M.C.D.; Carneiro, J.B. Freshwater mussels in Brazil: Past, present and future, at least, we hope they have one. Am. Conchol. 2012, 40, 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Metzger, J.P.; Casatti, L. Do diagnóstico à conservação da biodiversidade: O estado da arte do programa BIOTA/FAPESP. Biota Neotrop. 2006, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pinto, H.A.; De Melo, A.L. Larvas de trematódeos em moluscos do Brasil: Panorama e perpectivas após um século de estudos. Rev. Patol. Trop. 2014, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pinto, H.A.; De Melo, A.L. A checklist of cercariae (Trematoda: Digenea) in molluscs from Brazil. Zootaxa 2013, 3666, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brasil, Ministério da saúde (MS). Vigilância e Controle de Moluscos de Importância Epidemiológica; 2008. Available online: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/40259 (accessed on 4 October 2022)ISBN 9788533414389.
  14. Cantanhede, S.P.D.; Fernandez, M.A.; de Mattos, A.C.; Montresor, L.C.; Silva-Souza, N.; Thiengo, S.C. Freshwater gastropods of the Baixada Maranhense Microregion, an endemic area for schistosomiasis in the State of Maranhão, Brazil: I—Qualitative study. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shiff, C. Why reinvent the wheel? Lessons in schistosomiasis control from the past. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Coelho, P.M.Z.; Caldeira, R.L. Critical analysis of molluscicide application in schistosomiasis control programs in Brazil. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2016, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xu, J.; Yu, Q.; Tchuenté, L.-A.T.; Bergquist, R.; Sacko, M.; Utzinger, J.; Lin, D.-D.; Yang, K.; Zhang, L.-J.; Wang, Q.; et al. Enhancing collaboration between China and African countries for schistosomiasis control. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rekha, K.; Anbalagan, S.; Dinakaran, S. Distributional ecology of snails (Gastropoda: Mollusca) in seasonal ponds of Tamil Nadu, South India. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021, 41, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olivier, L.; Schneiderman, M. A method for estimating the density of aquatic snail populations. Exp. Parasitol. 1956, 5, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lobato, P. Lymnaea Viatrix: A Study of Tropotypic Specimens (Mollusca: Lymnaeidae). Rev. Bras. Biol. 1976, 36, 419–428. [Google Scholar]
  21. Molluscabase.org. Molluscabase—Lymnaea Columella Say, 1817. Available online: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=724461 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  22. de Simone, L.R.L. Land and Freshwater Mollusks of Brazil: An Illustrated Inventory on the Brazilian Malacofauna, Including Neighbor Regions of the South America, Respect to the Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystem; Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. Paraense, W.L. Physa Marmorata Guilding, 1828 (Pulmonata: Physidae). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1986, 81, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Núñez, V. Revisión de dos especies de Physidae. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2011, 82, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deslandes, N. Técnica de dissecação e exame de planorbídeos. Rev. Serv. Espec. Saude Publica 1951, 4, 371–382. [Google Scholar]
  26. Paraense, W.L. Estado atual da sistemática dos planorbídeos brasileiros (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Arq. Mus. Nac. Rio Jan. 1975, 55, 105–128. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vidigal, T.H.; Caldeira, R.L.; Simpson, A.J.; Carvalho, O.S. Further studies on the molecular systematics of Biomphalaria snails from Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2000, 95, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Caldeira, R.L.; Teodoro, T.M.; Jannotti-Passos, L.K.; Lira-Moreira, P.M.; Goveia, C.D.O.; Carvalho, O.D.S. Characterization of South American Snails of the Genus Biomphalaria (Basommatophora: Planorbidae) and Schistosoma mansoni (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) in Molluscs by PCR-RFLP. Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kuntz, R.E. Effect of light and temperature on shedding of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Eff. Light Temp. Shedding Schistosoma Mansom Cercariae 1946, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kostadinova, A.; Gibson, D.I. The systematics of the echinostomes. In Echinostomes as Experimental Models for Biological Research; Fried, B., Graczyk, T.K., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 31–57. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ellenberg, D.; Mueller-Dombois, D. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sneath, P.H.A.; Sokal, R.R. Numerical Taxonomy; W. H. Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  33. Scott, A.J.; Hosmer, D.W.; Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1991; Volume 47, ISBN 9780470582473. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Looman, C.W.N. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 1986, 65, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Medeiros, C.; Scholte, R.G.C.; D’Ávila, S.; Caldeira, R.L.; Carvalho, O.D.S. Distribuição espacial de Lymnaeidae (Mollusca, Basommatophora), hospedeiros intermediários de Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758 (Trematoda, Digenea) no Brasil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2014, 56, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Palasio, R.G.S.; Xavier, I.G.; Chiaravalotti-Neto, F.; Tuan, R. Diversity of Biomphalaria spp. freshwater snails and associated mollusks in areas with schistosomiasis risk, using molecular and spatial analysis tools. Biota Neotrop. 2019, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coelho, P.R.S.; Ker, F.T.O.; Araújo, A.D.; Guimarães, R.J.P.S.; Negrão-Corrêa, D.A.; Caldeira, R.L.; Geiger, S.M. Identification of Risk Areas for Intestinal Schistosomiasis, Based on Malacological and Environmental Data and on Reported Human Cases. Front. Med. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carvalho, O.D.S.; de Mendonça, C.L.F.; Marcelino, J.M.D.R.; Passos, L.K.J.; Fernandez, M.A.; Leal, R.D.S.; Caldeira, R.L.; Scholte, R.G.C.; Carmo, E.H.; Mesquita, S.G.; et al. Distribuição geográfica dos hospedeiros intermediários do Schistosoma mansoni nos estados do Paraná, Minas Gerais, Bahia, Pernambuco e Rio Grande do Norte, 2012–2014. Epidemiol. Serv. Saude Rev. Sist. Unico Saude Bras. 2018, 27, e2017343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fürst, T.; Duthaler, U.; Sripa, B.; Utzinger, J.; Keiser, J. Trematode Infections: Liver and lung flukes. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 26, 399–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lima, W.D.S.; Soares, L.R.M.; Barçante, T.A. Occurrence of Fasciola hepatica (Linnaeus, 1758) infection in Brazilian cattle of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2009, 18, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Van der Voort, M.; Charlier, J.; Lauwers, L.; Vercruysse, J.; Van Huylenbroeck, G.; Van Meensel, J. Conceptual framework for analysing farm-specific economic effects of helminth infections in ruminants and control strategies. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 109, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dracz, R.M.; Ribeiro, V.M.A.; Pereira, C.A.D.J.; Lima, W.D.S. Occurrence of Fasciola hepatica (Linnaeus, 1758) in capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) (Linnaeus, 1766) in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2016, 25, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ferreira, A.P.P.N.; Costa, A.L.O.; Becattini, R.M.; Ferreira, M.A.N.D.; Paixão, H.P.R.D.; Coscarelli, D.; Vidigal, T.H.D.A.; Lima, W.D.S.; Pereira, C.A.D.J. Integrative taxonomy: Combining molecular and morphological characteristics to identify Lymnaea (Galba) cubensis, intermediate host of Fasciola hepatica. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2021, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Costa, C.H.C.; Romijn, P.C.; Pinheiro, J.G.; Kimura, L.M.S.; Nascimento, R.F.; Magalhães, H.; Gonçalves, W.M.; Bruno, L.M.P.; Bruno, A.M.P.; Carvalho, L.; et al. Desenvolvimento sustentável e vigilância ambiental em propriedades rurais de agricultura familiar, com a equação de situações de risco da ocorrência de doenças infectocontagiosas no noroeste do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. In Conhecimento, Tecnologia e Inovação para o Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar: Contribuicoes das Organizacoes Estaduais de Pesquisa Agropecuaria; Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário: Brasília, Brazil, 2014; pp. 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  45. Serra-Freire, N.M. Fasciolose no Brasil: Aspectos epidemiológicos. In Tópicos em Malacologia—Ecos do XIX EBRAM; Fernandez, M.A., Santos, S.B., Pimenta, A.D., Thiengo, S.C., Eds.; Technical Books Editora: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2011; pp. 208–220. [Google Scholar]
  46. Molluscabase.org. Molluscabase—Physa Marmorata Guilding, 1828. Available online: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=848621 (accessed on 24 April 2022).
  47. Taylor, D.W. Introduction to Physidae (Gastropoda: Hygrophila); biogeography, classification, morphology. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2003, 265–287. [Google Scholar]
  48. ICMBio. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção—Volume I, 1st ed.; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brazil, 2018; ISBN 9788561842796.
  49. ICMBio. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção—Volume V—Anfíbios, 1st ed.; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brazil, 2018; Volume V.
  50. ICMBio. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção—Volume VI—Peixes, 1st ed.; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brazil, 2018.
  51. ICMBio. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção—Volume VII—Invertebrados, 1st ed.; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brazil, 2018.
  52. De Souza, M.A.A.; de Souza, L.A.; Machado-Coelho, G.L.L.; de Melo, A.L. Levantamento malacológico e mapeamento das áreas de risco para transmissão da esquistossomose mansoni no Município de Mariana, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev. Ciências Médicas Biológicas 2006, 5, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Miranda, G.S.; Rodrigues, J.G.M.; Lira, M.G.S.; Nogueira, R.A.; Gomes, G.C.C.; Miranda, B.S.; De Araújo, A.; Silva-Souza, N. Moluscos límnicos como hospedeiros de trematódeos digenéticos de uma região metropolitana da ilha do Maranhão, Brasil. Sci. Plena 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Famakinde, D. Treading the Path towards Genetic Control of Snail Resistance to Schistosome Infection. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Basuki, K.; Toledo, R. Biomphalaria Snails and Larval Trematodes; Toledo, R., Fried, B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Volume 53, ISBN 978-1-4419-7027-5. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mc Cullough, F.S. The Role of Mollusciciding in Schistosomiasis Control; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dai, J.; Wang, W.; Liang, Y.; Li, H.; Guan, X.; Zhu, Y. A novel molluscicidal formulation of niclosamide. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. WHO. WHO Guideline on Control and Elimination of Human Schistosomiasis; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  59. WHO. Field Use of Molluscicides in Schistosomiasis Control Programmes: An Operational Manual for Programme Managers; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  60. Instituto Estadual de Florestas (IEF). Áreas Prioritárias: Estratégias para a Conservação da Biodiversidade e dos Ecossistemas de Minas Gerais; IEF: Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2021; 162p.
Figure 1. Relative frequency of collected and identified freshwater mollusk genera in Alvorada de Minas (MG, Brazil).
Figure 1. Relative frequency of collected and identified freshwater mollusk genera in Alvorada de Minas (MG, Brazil).
Pathogens 11 01533 g001
Figure 2. Representative photographs of shells of the freshwater malacofauna captured in the municipality of Alvorada de Minas (MG): (A) Biomphalaria sp.; (B) Drepanotrema cimex; (C) Pseudosuccinea columella; (D) Stenophysa marmorata; (E) Omalonyx sp., and (F) Pomacea sp. (photographed with LEICA DFC450).
Figure 2. Representative photographs of shells of the freshwater malacofauna captured in the municipality of Alvorada de Minas (MG): (A) Biomphalaria sp.; (B) Drepanotrema cimex; (C) Pseudosuccinea columella; (D) Stenophysa marmorata; (E) Omalonyx sp., and (F) Pomacea sp. (photographed with LEICA DFC450).
Pathogens 11 01533 g002
Figure 3. Cercariae of the types echinostome (A), Xiphidiocercaria (B) found in Stenophysa marmorata, and strigeocercaria (C) found in Drepanotrema cimex (photographed with LEICA ICC50 HD).
Figure 3. Cercariae of the types echinostome (A), Xiphidiocercaria (B) found in Stenophysa marmorata, and strigeocercaria (C) found in Drepanotrema cimex (photographed with LEICA ICC50 HD).
Pathogens 11 01533 g003
Figure 4. Examples of different freshwater mollusk habitats sampled in Alvorada de Minas: (A) small water hole, habitat with the highest number of sampled mollusk species (HU1); (B) Rio do Peixe river, lotic environment (HU4); (C) lake, located in the center of the town, used by the population for leisure activities (HU5); (D) artificial reservoir for cattle, habitat with the unique record of the species B. cousini (HU11).
Figure 4. Examples of different freshwater mollusk habitats sampled in Alvorada de Minas: (A) small water hole, habitat with the highest number of sampled mollusk species (HU1); (B) Rio do Peixe river, lotic environment (HU4); (C) lake, located in the center of the town, used by the population for leisure activities (HU5); (D) artificial reservoir for cattle, habitat with the unique record of the species B. cousini (HU11).
Pathogens 11 01533 g004
Figure 5. Localization of the State of Minas Gerais within Brazil and of the municipality Alvorada de Minas within Minas Gerais. Enlarged map of the municipality with the division of the hydrographic units (HU1–HU12) and distribution of the malacofauna (colored pies) in the municipality and according to the various collection points (o white spots) (Table S1).
Figure 5. Localization of the State of Minas Gerais within Brazil and of the municipality Alvorada de Minas within Minas Gerais. Enlarged map of the municipality with the division of the hydrographic units (HU1–HU12) and distribution of the malacofauna (colored pies) in the municipality and according to the various collection points (o white spots) (Table S1).
Pathogens 11 01533 g005
Figure 6. Bidirectional grouping analysis and similarity, based on the Jaccard similarity index for snail species (left diagram) and hydrographic units (right diagram; HU1, HU3, HU4, HU5, HU7, HU9, HU11, and HU12), according to Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974) and to Sneath and Sokal (1973).
Figure 6. Bidirectional grouping analysis and similarity, based on the Jaccard similarity index for snail species (left diagram) and hydrographic units (right diagram; HU1, HU3, HU4, HU5, HU7, HU9, HU11, and HU12), according to Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974) and to Sneath and Sokal (1973).
Pathogens 11 01533 g006
Table 1. Sampled limnic habitats and presence of mollusks in relation to lotic and lentic environments in Alvorada de Minas.
Table 1. Sampled limnic habitats and presence of mollusks in relation to lotic and lentic environments in Alvorada de Minas.
Limnic Environments (Sampled Habitats)Presence of Limnic Gastropods (Habitats with Mollusks)p-Value
Lentic29150.02338
Lotic161
Total4516
p-value obtained by the chi-square test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coelho, P.R.S.; Ker, F.T.O.; Araujo, A.D.; Pinto, H.A.; Negrão-Corrêa, D.A.; Caldeira, R.L.; Geiger, S.M. Survey on Limnic Gastropods: Relationships between Human Health and Conservation. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121533

AMA Style

Coelho PRS, Ker FTO, Araujo AD, Pinto HA, Negrão-Corrêa DA, Caldeira RL, Geiger SM. Survey on Limnic Gastropods: Relationships between Human Health and Conservation. Pathogens. 2022; 11(12):1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121533

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coelho, Paulo R. S., Fabricio T. O. Ker, Amanda D. Araujo, Hudson A. Pinto, Deborah A. Negrão-Corrêa, Roberta L. Caldeira, and Stefan M. Geiger. 2022. "Survey on Limnic Gastropods: Relationships between Human Health and Conservation" Pathogens 11, no. 12: 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121533

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop