Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Combination of AS101 and Azidothymidine against Clinical Isolates of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Parasitology and Parasitome Maps as Old and New Tools to Improve Clinical Microbiomics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/pathogens10121551
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Characteristics of Stx2e-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Derived from Humans, Animals, and Meats

by
Xi Yang
1,†,
Yannong Wu
2,†,
Qian Liu
1,
Hui Sun
1,
Ming Luo
2,
Yanwen Xiong
1,
Andreas Matussek
3,4,
Bin Hu
5,* and
Xiangning Bai
1,4,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
2
Yulin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yulin 537000, China
3
Division of Laboratory, Medicine Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway
4
Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
5
Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2021, 10(12), 1551; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121551
Submission received: 11 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 28 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Shiga toxin (Stx) can be classified into two types, Stx1 and Stx2, and different subtypes. Stx2e is a subtype commonly causing porcine edema disease and rarely reported in humans. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence and genetic characteristics of Stx2e-producing Escherichia coli (Stx2e-STEC) strains from humans compared to strains from animals and meats in China. Stx2e-STEC strains were screened from our STEC collection, and whole-genome sequencing was performed to characterize their genetic features. Our study showed a wide distribution of Stx2e-STEC among diverse hosts and a higher proportion of Stx2e-STEC among human STEC strains in China. Three human Stx2e-STEC isolates belonged to O100:H30, Onovel26:H30, and O8:H9 serotypes and varied in genetic features. Human Stx2e-STECs phylogenetically clustered with animal- and food-derived strains. Stx2e-STEC strains from animals and meat showed multidrug resistance, while human strains were only resistant to azithromycin and tetracycline. Of note, a high proportion (55.9%) of Stx2e-STEC strains, including one human strain, carried the heat-stable and heat-labile enterotoxin-encoding genes st and lt, exhibiting a STEC/enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) hybrid pathotype. Given that no distinct genetic feature was found in Stx2e-STEC strains from different sources, animal- and food-derived strains may pose the risk of causing human disease.

1. Introduction

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a significant foodborne pathogen that can cause disease in humans and animals. The infection of STEC in humans may result in uncomplicated, bloody or non-bloody diarrhea, and even severe fatal sequelae, such as the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) [1]. More than 400 STEC serotypes have been reported globally, of which O157 remains the most common serogroup in clinical cases; however, non-O157 STEC infection has been increasingly reported in recent years [2,3]. The key virulence factor of STEC is Shiga toxin (Stx), which plays a central role in STEC-associated illness. Stx is encoded in the lysogenized lambdoid prophages late region. The Stx-converting prophages, as horizontal gene transfer (HGT) elements, can convert a harmless commensal into an enteric pathogen and promote the emergence of hybrid pathotypes. Thus Stx-converting prophages are considered key drivers of STEC pathogenesis [4].
Stx can be categorized into two immunologically distinct types: Stx1 and Stx2. Stx1 and Stx2 can be further classified into various subtypes, four Stx1 subtypes (Stx1a, Stx1c, Stx1d, and Stx1e) and nine Stx2 subtypes (Stx2a to Stx2i and Stx2k) [5,6,7,8]. Different Stx1/Stx2 subtypes vary in toxin potency and host specificity [5]. Stx2 is more often associated with human illness compared with Stx1. Stx1a, Stx2a, Stx2c, and Stx2d are significantly associated with severe clinical outcomes such as hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and HUS, whereas other subtypes are linked to mild symptoms [9,10]. Stx is an AB5 toxin. The B pentamer binds to cell surface-exposed glycosphingolipids (GSLs) of the globoseries and is responsible for delivering the A subunit to the cytoplasm [11]. By targeting microvascular endothelial cells of the human kidneys and the brain after gastrointestinal infection, Stx can cause renal insufficiency that can culminate into HUS, with a possible fatal outcome [12]. Of note, Stx1 and most Stx2 subtypes recognize the Stx receptor globotriaosylceramide (Gb3); however, Stx2e binds preferentially to globotetraosylceramide (Gb4), and can specifically recognize the uncommon Stx receptor globopentaosylceramide (Gb5) [9,12]. The distinctive difference in binding affinity confers Stx2e a unique recognition feature among other Stx subtypes. Stx2e is the main subtype associated with porcine edema disease [13]. Strains producing Stx2e have been widely reported in swine and pork in many countries [13,14]. Stx2e-STECs have also been found in environmental samples such as wastewater [15]. Although Stx2e-STEC is less frequently identified in humans, a few studies have indicated an association between Stx2e-STEC and human HUS [16], mild diarrhea, or asymptomatic cases [17,18,19], but the relationship between STEC isolates and human diseases has not been clearly delineated.
Human STEC infections may occur through direct contact with animals and consumption of animal-derived foods, especially raw meat. In a previous study [20], 6.2% of healthy pigs carried STEC strains, and all pig-derived STEC strains carried the stx2e subtype. A prior study indicated that Stx2e-producing E. coli isolates from humans and pigs differ in their virulence profiles [21], which may partially explain the varied pathogenicity among different hosts. However, the molecular characteristics of Stx2e-STEC from diverse sources are not fully understood. The objectives of the present study were to analyze the prevalence of Stx2e-STEC strains in humans and other sources in China and to characterize the molecular features of human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains in comparison with animal- and food-derived strains using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The phylogenetic relationships of Stx2e-STEC strains from different hosts were assessed, and their antimicrobial resistance was examined.

2. Results

2.1. Prevalence of stx2e-Carrying STEC Strains in Diverse Hosts

In total, 176 STEC strains carrying stx2e were identified from a collection of 818 STEC strains (21.5%) (Table 1). Stx2e-STEC strains were isolated from different samples collected from eight provinces in China between 2012 and 2018. Of note, 98% and 91.7% of STEC strains from pig and pork, respectively, carried the stx2e subtype. Stx2e-STEC strains were also isolated from cattle (2.9%), goat (1%), mutton (14%), and beef (18.5%). Three out of 44 (6.8%) human-derived STEC strains in our collection carried stx2e, two were from diarrheal outpatients hospitalized in Shanghai, and one was from a healthy carrier in Shenzhen (Figure 1).
Three Stx2e-STEC strains (one from a diarrheal patient, one from beef, and one from goat) also belonged to the stx2k subtype. Two strains (both from pig) carried two identical stx2e, and four strains carried two different stx2e variants each. A 1331 bp insertion sequence (IS2 family transposase) was found in the intergenic regions between the stx2 A and B subunits in three strains (all from raw meat).

2.2. Human-Derived Stx2e-STEC Strains

The human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains belonged to different serotypes (O100:H30, Onovel26:H30, and O8:H9) and MLST types (ST993, ST710, and ST21) and varied in their genome structures. The chromosome size of the three strains was ~4.9 Mbp. A total of 4753 (strain STEC409), 4826 (strain STEC413), and 5003 (strain STEC509) protein-encoding genes were predicted. The genomes comprised 20, 17, and 8 prophages, respectively. The plasmids, rRNA, and tRNA of the three human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains are summarized in Table 2.

2.3. Molecular Characteristics of Stx2e-STEC Strains from Different Sources

Twenty-three different serotypes were found in 59 Stx2e-STEC strains, among which, O9:H30 was the most predominant serotype accounting for 15% (9/59) of Stx2e-STEC strains, followed by O8:H19 (6/59, 10%), O100:H30, O9:H4, and Onovel26:H30 (5/59, 8%). The same serotypes were found in human-derived Stx2e-STECs (e.g., O100:H30 and Onovel26:H30 from diarrheal patients, O8:H19 from a healthy carrier) and strains from animals and meat (Figure 1). Twenty-two MLST sequence types (STs) were assigned to 59 Stx2e-STEC strains. ST933 (11/59, 19%) was the most predominant sequence type, followed by ST710 (8/59, 14%). Two strains from diarrheal patients (STEC409 and STEC413) belonged to ST933 and ST710; no other strain shared the same sequence type (ST21) with strain STEC509 from a healthy carrier (Figure 1).
Multiple virulence factors genes were identified in the 59 Stx2e-STEC strains. These virulence genes were classified into several groups based on their functions: adherence, iron uptake, secretion system, toxin, invasion, and others (Table S2). In addition to Stx2, other toxin-encoding genes were identified, for example, a gene cluster encoding alpha-hemolysin, astA (heat-stable enterotoxin 1, EAST1), sta (heat-stable enterotoxin STa), stb (heat-stable enterotoxin STb), lt (heat-labile enterotoxin LT). The adherence-associated factors mainly included porcine attaching and effacing associated factors Paa, curli fibers, type 1 fimbriae, P fimbriae, CFA/I fimbriae, etc. Secretion system effectors mainly included type II secretion proteins, non-LEE-encoded type III secretion system effectors, and type VI secretion system factors (Figure 1 and Table S2).
Strikingly, thirty-three Stx2e-STEC strains carried heat-labile toxin (LT)- or/and heat-stable toxin (ST)-encoding genes, which are virulence determinants for ETEC, thereby exhibiting a hybrid STEC/ETEC pathotype. Four STEC/ETEC strains (three from meat and one from an animal) carried the heat-labile toxin-encoding gene lt-II, 28 strains (one from a patient, 6 from meat, and 21 from animals) carried the heat-stable toxin gene sta, and 9 strains (five from animals and four from meat) carried the heat-stable toxin gene stb. Eight strains (five from animals and three from meat) carried both sta and stb.

2.4. Phylogenetic Relationships of the Stx2e-STEC Strains from Different Hosts

To assess the phylogenetic relationships of the Stx2e-STEC strains from humans and other hosts reported in this study and elsewhere, whole-genome SNP-based phylogeny trees were constructed. All Stx2e-STEC genomes available in the NCBI database were downloaded and used for comparison. The analysis showed that the Stx2e-STEC strains from different sources in this study were inter-mixed, yet, strains from foods or animals exhibited a higher tendency to cluster closely. The three human-derived strains distributed separately; among these, strain STEC413 from a diarrheal patient clustered with animal-derived strains, four of them exhibited the same serotype (Onovel26:H30) and ST (ST710) with STEC413, a total of 833 SNPs were found between strain STEC413 and a pig-derived strain STEC383. Strain STEC409 clustered with one strain from animal and three strains from meat, and 1670 SNPs were found between strain STEC409 and strain STEC351 from beef. One strain from the healthy carrier (STEC509) formed a separate cluster. The majority of Stx2e-STEC genomes were grouped based on serotype, with a few exceptions (Figure 1). In line with the phylogenetic relationships of Stx2e-STEC strains in this study, Stx2e-STEC strains from other countries scattered throughout the phylogenetic tree, and no distinct cluster was observed based on the host of strains, with a few exceptions (Figure S1).

2.5. Genetic Feature of Stx2e-Converting Prophages

We obtained 30 complete sequences of Stx2-coverting prophages from 22 complete Stx2e-STEC genome sequences. Of these, 28 Stx2e prophages and two Stx2k prophages were predicted, which was consistent with the stx subtyping showing that two strains (one from a diarrheal patient and one from beef) carried both stx2e and stx2k subtypes, and six strains harbored two copies of the stx2e gene. The 28 Stx2e-converting prophages were further characterized in terms of chromosomal insertion site, genetic structure, and sequence diversity. The size of 28 Stx2e prophages ranged from 24,820 bp to 83,659 bp, and the predicted CDSs ranged from 54 to 131. Five different insertion sites were found in the 28 Stx2e prophages. Three Stx2e prophages were integrated into the coding sequence of the parB gene (ParB/RepB/Spo0J family partition protein), 5 were integrated into the potC gene (spermidine/putrescine import ABC transporter permease protein PotC), 3 were integrated into the yccA gene (Modulator of FtsH protease YccA), 13 were inserted in the yciD gene (outer membrane protein W), and 4 were inserted in the yecE gene (DUF72 domain-containing protein YecE). For the six strains harboring two copies of the stx2e gene, the two Stx2e prophages in each strain were genetically diverse, with, e.g., different insertion site, length, etc. (Table S3 and Figure S2).
The Stx2e prophages from three human strains were genetically diverse. We then selected Stx2e prophages from other sources in this study that shared similar molecular features and close phylogenic relationship with the human-derived Stx2e prophages, together with two reference Stx2e prophages P27 (from a diarrheal patient) [22] and S1191 (from a pig with edema disease) [23]. The comparison between Stx2e prophages from humans and other sources revealed a considerable diversity of Stx2e prophages among strains sharing similar genomic features. Each prophage could be divided into three general modules, including integration and regulatory genes, virulence and lytic genes, DNA-packaging and morphogenesis, as previously reported [24]. The genetic structures of regulatory and virulence regions were similar among different Stx2e prophages, while regions related to morphogenesis were variable (Figure 2).

2.6. Antimicrobial Resistance of Stx2e-STEC Strains

Among the 19 antibiotics tested in this study, the resistance rate toward tetracycline was the highest (76.2%, 44/59), followed by resistance to nalidixic acid (59.3%, 35/59) and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (47.5%, 27/59). The resistance rate to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, colistin, and azithromycin was 20.3% (12/59), 20.3% (12/59), 16.9% (10/59), and 15.3% (8/59), respectively. All isolates were susceptible to aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, meropenem, amikacin, ampicillin–sulbactam, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, and imipenem. Thirteen isolates (22.0%) were susceptible to all 19 antimicrobial agents tested. Five isolates (8.5%) were only resistant to one antimicrobial substance. One diarrheal patient-derived Stx2e-STEC strain was resistant to azithromycin and tetracycline, the healthy carrier-derived strain was resistant to tetracycline, and one diarrheal patient-derived strain was susceptible to all antibiotics tested. Multidrug resistance was identified in 35 non-human isolates (59.3%) (Table 3).
The antibiotic resistance phenotype corresponded to the presence of antibiotic resistance-related genes for some antibiotics. For instance, strains carrying genes associated with resistance to phenicols (cmlA1, cmlA6, and floR), tetracyclines (tetA and tetD), macrolides (mphA and mrx), were all resistant to chloramphenicol, tetracyclines, and azithromycin, respectively. Eight out of nine isolates carrying colistin-related genes (mcr-1 and mcr-3.1) were resistant to colistin. However, the majority of strains carrying AMR genes involved in resistance to class C β-lactamase (ampC), aminoglycoside (aadA, aac(3)-IIa and aac(3)-IIc) were not resistant to related antibiotics (Table 3).

3. Discussion

Stx2e-producing E. coli strains have been identified from various sources including animals [25,26,27], foods [28,29,30,31], and environment, especially wastewater [32]. Human infections with Stx2e-STEC strains are rare. It has been reported that Stx2e-STEC isolates accounted for 4.6% (12/262) of STEC strains isolated from patients with diarrhea and 4.2% (4/96) of STEC strains from asymptomatic individuals in Germany [17]. Bai et al. recently reported that 1.1% (2/184) of clinical STEC strains carried stx2e in Sweden [33]. In this study, 6.8% of total human-derived STEC strains carried stx2e, which is slightly higher than the percentage reported in other countries, as mentioned above. This might be due to the higher transmission of Stx2e-STEC strains through more frequent contact with animals or consumption of contaminated meat in China. The swine breeding industry is thriving in China, and numerous E. coli isolates from pigs with edema disease and post-weaning diarrhea have been recovered, with Stx2e-STEC accounting for a large proportion of them [34,35]. Moreover, high rates of Stx2e-STEC strains were reported from healthy pigs and raw meat in China [20,36]. These may contribute to the higher number of human Stx2e-STEC infections in China. However, we acknowledge that only three human sourced isolates were used in this study, thus the related data should be compared with caution.
Although Stx2e is a less common subtype in human STEC strains, studies have shown associations between Stx2e-STEC and severe symptoms such as HUS [16,37,38], and diarrhea [18,19]. Molecular characterization revealed that human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains in this study were diverse. The serotypes of human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains were also identified in strains from other sources. It has been found that a vast majority of Stx2e-STEC isolates do not express virulence factors associated with HUS, such as genes encoding intimin (eae) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli hemolysin (ehxA) [39]. It is therefore likely that Stx2e-STEC cause disease through different mechanisms [40]. Consistent with previous studies [39], eae and ehxA, commonly detected in O157:H7 strains, were absent in all Stx2e-STEC strains in this study. All our Stx2e-STEC strains belonged to non-O157 serotypes. No difference was observed between human and pig isolates in the iron uptake system-encoding genes fyuA and irp1/irp2, dissimilar to an earlier study [21]. Further studies are required to investigate the pathogenic mechanisms of Stx2e-STEC.
The whole-genome phylogeny indicated a high diversity of Stx2e-STEC strains, with strains from different hosts scattered throughout the phylogenetic tree. The human-derived strains clustered with animal- and food-derived strains, and no host-specific cluster was observed. A similar trend was found when comparing our Stx2e-STEC strains with strains from different sources in other countries. We were unable to clearly distinguish Stx2e-STEC strains associated with human disease and strains from other sources at genomic level in this study. It should be noted that one O100:H30 strain from a diarrheal patient in our study clustered with O100:H30 strains isolated from diarrheal patients in Sweden and Netherlands [41,42]. Besides, some animal and food-derived strains in this study were phylogenetically close to human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains from other countries. Serotype-specific clusters were observed among some serotypes, e.g., O121:H10, O139:H1, and O155:H21, while some were not clustered, e.g., O8:H19, O9:H10, and O100:H30, indicating the genetic diversity of these Stx2e-STEC strains.
Notably, 56% of Stx2e-STEC strains in our study, including one of three human strains, carried the heat-stable toxin (ST) or/and heat-labile toxin (LT)-encoding gene st or/and lt, exhibiting a STEC/ETEC hybrid pathotype. It should be noted that Stx2 and most ST/LT encoding genes are located on phages and plasmids, where horizontal gene transfer may occur, thereby facilitating the emergence of hybrid pathotypes. On the other hand, the high prevalence of a hybrid pathotype among Stx2e-STEC strains may indicate a greater plasticity of Stx2e-STEC genomes compared to those of other subtypes. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanism of the emergence of hybrid pathotypes and the high prevalence of STEC/ETEC hybrids among Stx2e-STEC strains.
Stx phages are known to have similar morphologies (e.g., short or long non-contract tails). Their genomes size ranged from 30 to 70 kb and showed little homology, although having a similar genetic organization [43]. We observed genetic diversity mainly in the phage morphogenesis region among Stx2e phages from different hosts, but also from the same host. Five different insertion sites were found in 28 Stx2e phages, four of which have been reported in Stx phages previously [44]. Consistent with the report that a significant portion of STEC strains carry more than one Stx phage [24], we found that eight strains harbored two Stx2 prophages. Intriguingly, two Stx2e-STEC strains harbored a prophage carrying the recently identified stx2k subtype [7]. This expands the prior knowledge that stx2e was rarely coexistent with other stx genes [39]. IS elements were identified in the stx gene in three Stx2e prophages. The 1.3 kb transposable element IS2 is a member of the IS3 family [45]. Pinto et al. [24] reported that the IS3 family is widely distributed in Stx phages. Further studies are required to examine Stx2 production in Stx2e-STEC strains and to assess if the expression of Stx2e could be inhibited by insertion elements.
In this study, the antibiotic resistance phenotype corresponded well to the genotype for some antibiotics, such as colistin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and azithromycin, while strains carrying genes involved in resistance to beta-lactamase antibiotics, aminoglycosides, and sulfonamides were largely susceptible to the related antimicrobial agents. This may be due to the inhibited expression level of genes, as previously reported [46,47]. Cointe et al. [48] reported that azithromycin decreases Stx production at subinhibitory concentrations, suggesting that it could be tested in clinical trials. Yet, one diarrheal patient-derived Stx2e-STEC strain in our study was resistant to azithromycin, suggesting caution in the use of azithromycin in the treatment of STEC-infected patients suffering from diarrhea and HUS. It should be noted that 59.3% of Stx2e-STEC strains showed multidrug resistance (MDR), and all MDR strains were isolated from animals and foods. This might be due to a higher antibiotic exposure in animals. The high prevalence of MDR isolates highlights the importance of a proper management of antibiotics use in farming. The animal- and food-derived MDR Stx2e-STEC strains may pose a high risk of causing severe disease.
To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the prevalence and molecular traits of Stx2e-STEC strains from diverse hosts. Our study demonstrated a wide distribution of Stx2e-STEC in diverse hosts. Genomic characterization revealed considerable genetic diversity of Stx2e-STEC strains from different sources, and human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains clustered with animal- and food-derived strains. Of note, a high prevalence of STEC/ETEC hybrid pathotypes was found among the Stx2e-STEC strains, indicating great plasticity of the Stx2e-STEC genomes. Given that no distinct genetic feature was found in the human Stx2e-STEC strains, human infection with Stx2e-STEC through contact with animals and consumption of contaminated foods should be controlled to attenuate the risk of disease.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Stx2e-STEC Strains Collection

Fecal samples from diarrheal patients, healthy carriers, animals, and meats were collected from April 2009 to March 2019 in different regions of China. STEC strains were isolated and confirmed by the methods as previously described [49]. Briefly, the samples were enriched in EC broth and then tested for the presence of stx1/stx2 genes by PCR. stx-positive samples were inoculated into two selective media, i.e., CHROMagarTM ECC agar and CHROMagarTM STEC agar (CHROMagar, Paris, France), for isolation of STEC strains, as described previously [42]. After overnight incubation at 37 ℃, presumptive colonies were picked and tested for stx genes by single a colony duplex PCR assay. API 20E biochemical test strips (bioMérieux, Lyon, France) were used for a confirmatory test. The stx1/stx2 subtyping was initially conducted by amplifying, sequencing the complete stx1/stx2 genes, and comparing against known stx subtypes, as described previously [5]. STEC strains carrying the stx2e subtype were selected for subsequent study.

4.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS), Assembly, and Annotation

Bacterial DNA extraction was performed with the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Library preparation and WGS were performed at Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd., China. To obtain the draft genomes of STEC, DNA library preparation was done using NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The library was then pair-end (2 × 150 bp) sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The paired-end reads were filtered by fastp 0.20.1 (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp accessed on 25 January 2021) [50] and then de novo assembled using SKESA version 2.4.0 (https://github.com/ncbi/SKESA accessed on 25 January 2021) [51]. Low-quality contigs (length < 500 bp) were filtered with Seqkit version 0.11.0 [52]. To obtain the complete genomes, two sequencing libraries were prepared, in addition to the Illumina DNA library as described above, a 10 kb library was prepared using an SMRT bell Template Prep kit (version 1.0), and then sequenced using the PacBio Sequel platform (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The long reads were preliminarily filtered using “RUN QC” module in SMRT Link version 5.1.0 (www.pacb.com/support/software-downloads accessed on 30 January 2021), de novo assembled using the Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process (HGAP) pipeline [53], then corrected using the Illumina short reads to obtain complete genomes. The genome sequences were annotated with Prokka (version 1.11) [54].

4.3. Determination of stx2 Subtype, Serotype, MLST, Virulence Factor Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

The stx subtypes were further verified by comparing all the assemblies against an in-house database including 149 representative nucleotide sequences of all identified stx1 subtypes (stx1a, stx1c, stx1d, and stx1e) and stx2 (stx2a to stx2k) subtypes using ABRicate version 0.8.10 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate accessed on 2 May 2021). In silico serotyping and screening of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes were conducted using ABRicate version 0.8.10 against EcOH database [55], the E. coli virulence factors repository (https://github.com/phac-nml/ecoli_vf accessed on 2 May 2021), and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database [56] (http://arpcard.mcmaster.ca accessed on 2 May 2021), respectively, with the following parameters: coverage≥ 90% and identity≥ 80%. The enterotoxin-encoding genes were extracted and compared against an in-house database including representative nucleotide sequences of the heat-stable and heat-labile enterotoxin-encoding gene st and lt, using ABRicate version 0.8.10. Nucleotide sequences of different st and lt subtypes were obtained from previous reports [57,58,59]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of seven housekeeping genes was performed through an on-line tool provided by the Warwick E. coli MLST scheme website (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/ecoli/allele_st_search accessed on 2 May 2021).

4.4. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-Based Phylogeny

A whole-genome SNP phylogeny was used to assess the genomic diversity and relatedness of Stx2e-STEC strains in this study. First, the core alignment of the SNPs was obtained by using snippy-multi in Snippy version 4.3.6 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy accessed on 23 August 2021) with default parameters; the reference genome was Sakai (NC_002695.2). Gubbins version 2.3.4 [60] was then used to remove recombinations from core SNP alignments. Finally, a maximum likelihood tree based on filtered SNP alignments was constructed using FastTree version 2.1.10. (http://www.microbesonline.org/fasttree/ accessed on 23 August 2021). Snippy version 4.3.6 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy accessed on 2 November 2021) was used for SNP variants calling between human-derived strains and strains from other sources. To assess the phylogenetic position of Stx2e-STEC strains in this study among others, 102 Stx2e-STEC genome sequences from different sources were download from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI) (Table S1).

4.5. Genomic Characterization of Stx2e-Converting Prophages

The genome characteristics of Stx prophages were analyzed and visualized using methods previously described [7]. Briefly, PHAge Search Tool Enhanced Release (PHASTER, http://phaster.ca/ accessed on 15 May 2021) was used to identify Stx-converting phages from STEC genomes. The intact Stx prophage sequences were then extracted from the complete genomes. Subsequently, the RAST server (http://rast.nmpdr.org/ accessed on 18 May 2021) [61] was used to annotate the genome of Stx-converting phage. The functions of protein-coding sequences (CDSs) were verified using BLASTP (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi accessed on 20 May 2021) against the GenBank non-redundant protein database. The gene adjacent to the integrase gene was designated as the phage insertion site [44]. The full sequences of Stx2e phage were compared in detail using Mauve [62] and blastN program in BLAST, with an e-value cutoff of e-10 and was visualized using an in-house Perl script (https://github.com/dupengcheng/BlastViewer accessed on 13 November 2021).

4.6. Antimicrobial Resistance Testing

The BD PhoenixTM M50 Automated Microbiology System (BD, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 19 antimicrobial agents according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as previously described [63]. The antimicrobial agents include ampicillin–sulbactam (SAM, 1–32 µg/mL),trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 0.5–8 µg/mL), meropenem (MEM, 0.125–8 µg/mL), colistin (PB, 0.25–8 µg/mL), ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA, 0.25/4–8/4 µg/mL), nitrofurantoin (F, 32–256 µg/mL), tetracycline (TET, 1–16 µg/mL), ertapenem (ETP, 0.25–8 µg/mL), ceftazidime (CAZ, 0.25–16 µg/mL), chloramphenicol (CHL, 4–32 µg/mL), imipenem (IPM, 0.25–8 µg/mL), ampicillin (AMP, 2–32 µg/mL), cefoxitin (FOX, 2–64 µg/mL), cefotaxime (CTX, 0.25–16 µg/mL), nalidixic acid (NA, 4–32 µg/mL), azithromycin (AZM, 2–64 µg/mL), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 0.015–2 µg/mL), aztreonam (ATM, 0.25–16 µg/mL), and amikacin (AMK, 4–64 µg/mL). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [64].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10121551/s1, Table S1. Genomes of 102 Stx2e-STEC strains used in whole-genome analysis. Table S2. Virulence genes in the 59 Stx2e-STEC strains in this study. Table S3. Characterization of 28 Stx2e-converting prophages. Figure S1. Whole-genome phylogeny of Stx2e-STEC strains in this study and reference strains. Stx2e-STEC strains in this study are indicated as shown, others are reference strains used for comparison. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on core-genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the Maximum-Likelihood method. The genomes of 102 reference Stx2e-STEC strains were downloaded from NCBI; the accession number, source, and country of origin for the reference strains are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Figure S2. Genome alignment of the 28 Stx2e prophages. The color of the text indicates the source of the strains: red represents human-derived strains, green represents animal-derived strains, and blue represents meat-derived strains. Colored blocks are connected by lines to the homologous in other genomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.B. and Y.X.; Methodology, X.Y., Y.W. and B.H.; Software, X.Y.; Validation, Y.W., Q.L. and H.S.; Formal Analysis, X.Y.; Investigation, Y.X.; Resources, Y.W., M.L. and B.H.; Data Curation, X.B.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.Y.; Writing—Review & Editing, A.M. and X.B.; Visualization, Y.X.; Supervision, Y.X.; Project Administration, Y.X.; Funding Acquisition, Y.X. and X.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1603800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772152, 82072254), and the National Science and Technology Major Project (2018ZX10301407-002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No. ICDC2017-003).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all patients to collect clinical strains and related information used in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are publicly available in the NCBI, with accession numbers provided in Figure 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bryan, A.; Youngster, I.; McAdam, A.J. Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015, 35, 247–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gould, L.H.; Mody, R.K.; Ong, K.L.; Clogher, P.; Cronquist, A.B.; Garman, K.N.; Lathrop, S.; Medus, C.; Spina, N.L.; Webb, T.H.; et al. Increased recognition of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States during 2000–2010: Epidemiologic features and comparison with E. coli O157 infections. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bruyand, M.; Mariani-Kurkdjian, P.; Gouali, M.; de Valk, H.; King, L.A.; Le Hello, S.; Bonacorsi, S.; Loirat, C. Hemolytic uremic syndrome due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection. Med. Mal. Infect. 2018, 48, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rodríguez-Rubio, L.; Haarmann, N.; Schwidder, M.; Muniesa, M.; Schmidt, H. Bacteriophages of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and their contribution to pathogenicity. Pathogens 2021, 10, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Scheutz, F.; Teel, L.D.; Beutin, L.; Pierard, D.; Buvens, G.; Karch, H.; Mellmann, A.; Caprioli, A.; Tozzoli, R.; Morabito, S.; et al. Multicenter evaluation of a sequence-based protocol for subtyping Shiga toxins and standardizing Stx nomenclature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2951–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bai, X.; Fu, S.; Zhang, J.; Fan, R.; Xu, Y.; Sun, H.; He, X.; Xu, J.; Xiong, Y. Identification and pathogenomic analysis of an Escherichia coli strain producing a novel Shiga toxin 2 subtype. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, X.; Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, H.; Fu, S.; Fan, R.; He, X.; Scheutz, F.; Matussek, A.; Xiong, Y. Escherichia coli strains producing a novel Shiga toxin 2 subtype circulate in China. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 310, 151377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Probert, W.S.; McQuaid, C.; Schrader, K. Isolation and identification of an Enterobacter cloacae strain producing a novel subtype of Shiga toxin type 1. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2346–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lee, K.S.; Jeong, Y.J.; Lee, M.S. Escherichia coli Shiga toxins and gut microbiota interactions. Toxins 2021, 13, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bergan, J.; Dyve Lingelem, A.B.; Simm, R.; Skotland, T.; Sandvig, K. Shiga toxins. Toxicon 2012, 60, 1085–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pacheco, A.R.; Sperandio, V. Shiga toxin in enterohemorrhagic E. coli: Regulation and novel anti-virulence strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Steil, D.; Schepers, C.L.; Pohlentz, G.; Legros, N.; Runde, J.; Humpf, H.U.; Karch, H.; Muthing, J. Shiga toxin glycosphingolipid receptors of Vero-B4 kidney epithelial cells and their membrane microdomain lipid environment. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 2322–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Baldo, V.; Salogni, C.; Giovannini, S.; D’Incau, M.; Boniotti, M.B.; Birbes, L.; Pitozzi, A.; Formenti, N.; Grassi, A.; Pasquali, P.; et al. Pathogenicity of Shiga toxin type 2e Escherichia coli in pig colibacillosis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 545818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arancia, S.; Iurescia, M.; Lorenzetti, S.; Stravino, F.; Buccella, C.; Caprioli, A.; Franco, A.; Battisti, A.; Morabito, S.; Tozzoli, R. Detection and isolation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains in caecal samples from pigs at slaughter in Italy. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 5, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vernozy-Rozand, C.; Montet, M.P.; Bertin, Y.; Trably, F.; Girardeau, J.P.; Martin, C.; Livrelli, V.; Beutin, L. Serotyping, Stx2 subtyping, and characterization of the locus of enterocyte effacement island of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and E. coli O157:H7 strains isolated from the environment in France. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 2556–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Fasel, D.; Mellmann, A.; Cernela, N.; Hachler, H.; Fruth, A.; Khanna, N.; Egli, A.; Beckmann, C.; Hirsch, H.H.; Goldenberger, D.; et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a 65-Year-old male linked to a very unusual type of stx2e- and eae-harboring O51:H49 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1301–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Friedrich, A.W.; Bielaszewska, M.; Zhang, W.L.; Pulz, M.; Kuczius, T.; Ammon, A.; Karch, H. Escherichia coli harboring Shiga toxin 2 gene variants: Frequency and association with clinical symptoms. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 185, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fernandes, M.R.; Ignacio, A.; Martins, F.H.; Rocha, L.B.; Piazza, R.M.F.; Vaz, T.M.I.; Avila-Campos, M.J.; Nakano, V. Presence of Shiga toxin 2e-producing Escherichia coli and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli in an asymptomatic child. JMM Case Rep. 2014, 1, e000001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saupe, A.; Edel, B.; Pfister, W.; Loffler, B.; Ehricht, R.; Rodel, J. Acute diarrhoea due to a Shiga toxin 2e-producing Escherichia coli O8:H19. JMM Case Rep. 2017, 4, e005099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Meng, Q.; Bai, X.; Zhao, A.; Lan, R.; Du, H.; Wang, T.; Shi, C.; Yuan, X.; Bai, X.; Ji, S.; et al. Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from healthy pigs in China. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sonntag, A.K.; Bielaszewska, M.; Mellmann, A.; Dierksen, N.; Schierack, P.; Wieler, L.H.; Schmidt, M.A.; Karch, H. Shiga toxin 2e-producing Escherichia coli isolates from humans and pigs differ in their virulence profiles and interactions with intestinal epithelial cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8855–8863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Muniesa, M.; Recktenwald, J.; Bielaszewska, M.; Karch, H.; Schmidt, H. Characterization of a shiga toxin 2e-converting bacteriophage from an Escherichia coli strain of human origin. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4850–4855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hostetter, S.J.; Helgerson, A.F.; Paton, J.C.; Paton, A.W.; Cornick, N.A. Therapeutic use of a receptor mimic probiotic reduces intestinal Shiga toxin levels in a piglet model of hemolytic uremic syndrome. BMC Res. Notes 2014, 7, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pinto, G.; Sampaio, M.; Dias, O.; Almeida, C.; Azeredo, J.; Oliveira, H. Insights into the genome architecture and evolution of Shiga toxin encoding bacteriophages of Escherichia coli. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cha, W.; Fratamico, P.M.; Ruth, L.E.; Bowman, A.S.; Nolting, J.M.; Manning, S.D.; Funk, J.A. Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in finishing pigs: Implications on public health. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 264, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maluta, R.P.; Fairbrother, J.M.; Stella, A.E.; Rigobelo, E.C.; Martinez, R.; de Avila, F.A. Potentially pathogenic Escherichia coli in healthy, pasture-raised sheep on farms and at the abattoir in Brazil. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 169, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Osek, J.; Gallien, P.; Protz, D. Characterization of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from calves in Poland. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000, 23, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, P.C.; Reddy, S. Prevalences of Shiga toxin subtypes and selected other virulence factors among Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from fresh produce. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 6917–6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Serrano, N.S.; Zweifel, C.; Corti, S.; Stephan, R. Microbiological quality and presence of foodborne pathogens in raw milk cheeses and raw meat products marketed at farm level in Switzerland. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2018, 7, 7337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lee, J.B.; Han, D.; Lee, H.T.; Wi, S.M.; Park, J.H.; Jo, J.W.; Cho, Y.J.; Hahn, T.W.; Lee, S.; Kang, B.; et al. Pathogenic and phylogenetic characteristics of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from retail meats in South Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2018, 19, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Martin, A.; Beutin, L. Characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from meat and milk products of different origins and association with food producing animals as main contamination sources. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 146, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bibbal, D.; Um, M.M.; Diallo, A.A.; Kerouredan, M.; Dupouy, V.; Toutain, P.L.; Bousquet-Melou, A.; Oswald, E.; Brugere, H. Mixing of Shiga toxin-producing and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in a wastewater treatment plant receiving city and slaughterhouse wastewater. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Hua, Y.; Jernberg, C.; Xiong, Y.; French, N.; Lofgren, S.; Hedenstrom, I.; Ambikan, A.; Mernelius, S.; et al. Genomic Insights into clinical Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli Strains: A 15-year period survey in Jonkoping, Sweden. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 627861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, S.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Miao, Z. Prevalence and characterization of virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from piglets suffering post-weaning diarrhoea in Shandong Province, China. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 6, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, G.Y.; Guo, L.; Su, J.H.; Zhu, Y.H.; Jiao, L.G.; Wang, J.F. Frequency of diarrheagenic virulence genes and characteristics in Escherichia coli Isolates from pigs with diarrhea in China. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Bai, X.; Wang, H.; Xin, Y.; Wei, R.; Tang, X.; Zhao, A.; Sun, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail raw meats in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 200, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pierard, D.; Huyghens, L.; Lauwers, S.; Lior, H. Diarrhoea associated with Escherichia coli producing porcine oedema disease verotoxin. Lancet 1991, 338, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thomas, A.; Cheasty, T.; Chart, H.; Rowe, B. Isolation of Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serotypes O9ab:H- and O101:H-carrying VT2 variant gene sequences from a patient with haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1994, 13, 1074–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Beutin, L.; Kruger, U.; Krause, G.; Miko, A.; Martin, A.; Strauch, E. Evaluation of major types of Shiga toxin 2E-producing Escherichia coli bacteria present in food, pigs, and the environment as potential pathogens for humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4806–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Franke, S.; Harmsen, D.; Caprioli, A.; Pierard, D.; Wieler, L.H.; Karch, H. Clonal relatedness of Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli O101 strains of human and porcine origin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 3174–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Ferdous, M.; Friedrich, A.W.; Grundmann, H.; de Boer, R.F.; Croughs, P.D.; Islam, M.A.; Kluytmans-van den Bergh, M.F.; Kooistra-Smid, A.M.; Rossen, J.W. Molecular characterization and phylogeny of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates obtained from two Dutch regions using whole genome sequencing. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 642.e1–642.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Ambikan, A.; Jernberg, C.; Ehricht, R.; Scheutz, F.; Xiong, Y.; Matussek, A. Molecular characterization and comparative genomics of clinical hybrid Shiga toxin-producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC/ETEC) strains in Sweden. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kruger, A.; Lucchesi, P.M. Shiga toxins and stx phages: Highly diverse entities. Microbiology 2015, 161, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Steyert, S.R.; Sahl, J.W.; Fraser, C.M.; Teel, L.D.; Scheutz, F.; Rasko, D.A. Comparative genomics and stx phage characterization of LEE-negative Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lewis, L.A.; Astatke, M.; Umekubo, P.T.; Alvi, S.; Saby, R.; Afrose, J. Soluble expression, purification and characterization of the full length IS2 Transposase. Mob. DNA 2011, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Peter-Getzlaff, S.; Polsfuss, S.; Poledica, M.; Hombach, M.; Giger, J.; Böttger, E.C.; Zbinden, R.; Bloemberg, G.V. Detection of AmpC beta-lactamase in Escherichia coli: Comparison of three phenotypic confirmation assays and genetic analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2924–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Davis, M.A.; Besser, T.E.; Orfe, L.H.; Baker, K.N.; Lanier, A.S.; Broschat, S.L.; New, D.; Call, D.R. Genotypic-phenotypic discrepancies between antibiotic resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from calves in management settings with high and low antibiotic use. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3293–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cointe, A.; Birgy, A.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Mariani-Kurkdjian, P.; Walewski, V.; Levy, C.; Cohen, R.; Fach, P.; Delannoy, S.; Bidet, P.; et al. Escherichia coli O80 hybrid pathotype strains producing Shiga toxin and ESBL: Molecular characterization and potential therapeutic options. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fan, R.; Shao, K.; Yang, X.; Bai, X.; Fu, S.; Sun, H.; Xu, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Hu, B.; et al. High prevalence of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle detected by combining four selective agars. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Souvorov, A.; Agarwala, R.; Lipman, D.J. SKESA: Strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Shen, W.; Le, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, F. SeqKit: A Cross-Platform and Ultrafast Toolkit for FASTA/Q File Manipulation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chin, C.S.; Alexander, D.H.; Marks, P.; Klammer, A.A.; Drake, J.; Heiner, C.; Clum, A.; Copeland, A.; Huddleston, J.; Eichler, E.E.; et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ingle, D.J.; Valcanis, M.; Kuzevski, A.; Tauschek, M.; Inouye, M.; Stinear, T.; Levine, M.M.; Robins-Browne, R.M.; Holt, K.E. In silico serotyping of E. coli from short read data identifies limited novel O-loci but extensive diversity of O:H serotype combinations within and between pathogenic lineages. Microb. Genom. 2016, 2, e000064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.; et al. CARD 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D517–D525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Bai, X.; Ma, J.; Dang, R.; Xiong, Y.; Fanning, S.; Bai, L.; Yang, Z. Characterization of five Escherichia coli isolates co-expressing ESBL and MCR-1 resistance mechanisms from different origins in China. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jobling, M.G. Novel type II heat-labile enterotoxin produced by human disease outbreak isolates of Escherichia coli Is a member of the LT-IIa Family and should not form a new group: Clarification of nomenclature and precedent. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ishimaru, K.; Sasaki, M.; Narimatsu, H.; Arimizu, Y.; Gotoh, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Hayashi, T.; Ogura, Y. Escherichia coli O8:H8 carrying a novel variant of the heat-labile enterotoxin LT2 gene caused outbreaks of diarrhea. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Croucher, N.J.; Page, A.J.; Connor, T.R.; Delaney, A.J.; Keane, J.A.; Bentley, S.D.; Parkhill, J.; Harris, S.R. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Pan, Y.; Hu, B.; Bai, X.; Yang, X.; Cao, L.; Liu, Q.; Sun, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Jin, D.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from humans and domestic animals. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pathogens 10 01551 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on core-genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the Maximum-Likelihood method. Source, serotype, MLST type, accession number of all strains are shown. Strains carrying heat-stable/heat-labile enterotoxin-encoding genes and the Shiga toxin 2k gene are marked, as indicated. The blue circle on the branch indicates the bootstrap value (≥50%) of the node.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on core-genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the Maximum-Likelihood method. Source, serotype, MLST type, accession number of all strains are shown. Strains carrying heat-stable/heat-labile enterotoxin-encoding genes and the Shiga toxin 2k gene are marked, as indicated. The blue circle on the branch indicates the bootstrap value (≥50%) of the node.
Pathogens 10 01551 g001
Pathogens 10 01551 g002 550
Figure 2. Architecture of eight Stx2e-converting prophages from different hosts. Corresponding CDSs are colored as indicated. The color of the text indicates the source of the strains: red represents human-derived strains, green represents animal-derived strains, and blue represents meat-derived strains. Stx2e prophages P27 (from a diarrheal patient) and S1191 (from a pig with edema disease) were used as references. Stx2e prophages from the three human-derived strains were compared with those from other sources that share similar genetic features and close phylogenic relationship, i.e., strain STEC409 from a diarrheal patient and strain STEC214 from pig share the same serotype (O100:H30) and MLST type (ST993); strain STEC413 (diarrheal patient) and strain STEC383 (pig) share the same serotype (Onovel26:H30) and MLST type (ST710); strain STEC509 (healthy carrier) and strain STEC379 (meat) belong to the same serotype (O8:H19). Ranges of over 68% nucleotide identity between phages are marked by blue shading.
Figure 2. Architecture of eight Stx2e-converting prophages from different hosts. Corresponding CDSs are colored as indicated. The color of the text indicates the source of the strains: red represents human-derived strains, green represents animal-derived strains, and blue represents meat-derived strains. Stx2e prophages P27 (from a diarrheal patient) and S1191 (from a pig with edema disease) were used as references. Stx2e prophages from the three human-derived strains were compared with those from other sources that share similar genetic features and close phylogenic relationship, i.e., strain STEC409 from a diarrheal patient and strain STEC214 from pig share the same serotype (O100:H30) and MLST type (ST993); strain STEC413 (diarrheal patient) and strain STEC383 (pig) share the same serotype (Onovel26:H30) and MLST type (ST710); strain STEC509 (healthy carrier) and strain STEC379 (meat) belong to the same serotype (O8:H19). Ranges of over 68% nucleotide identity between phages are marked by blue shading.
Pathogens 10 01551 g002
Table
Table 1. Distribution of Stx2e-STEC strains from different hosts in China.
Table 1. Distribution of Stx2e-STEC strains from different hosts in China.
Source No. of STECs No. of Stx2e-STECs (%)No. of Stx2e-STECs Used for WGS a
HumanHealthy carrier 51 (20.0%)1
Diarrheal patient392 (5.1%)2
AnimalPig147144 (98.0%)29
Cattle1725 (2.9%)3
Goat2022 (1.0%)2
Chicken400
Tibetan antelope500
Yak12600
Marmot900
Pika2200
MeatPork1211 (91.7%)11
Mutton436 (14.0%)6
Beef275 (18.5%)5
Chicken100
Duck100
EnvironmentWater300
Total 818176 (21.5%)59
a WGS: whole-genome sequencing.
Table
Table 2. Genome features of human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains in this study.
Table 2. Genome features of human-derived Stx2e-STEC strains in this study.
StrainTotal Length (bp)G + C a Ratio (%)No. CDS bNo. rRNANo. tRNANo. ProphagesNo. Plasmids
STEC4094,857,38951.8247532294202
STEC4134,948,66450.6148262290171
STEC5094,871,41550.715003228780
a Guanine and cytosine. b Coding sequence.
Table
Table 3. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance phenotype and genotype among the 59 Stx2e-STEC isolates.
Table 3. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance phenotype and genotype among the 59 Stx2e-STEC isolates.
Antimicrobial ClassesAMR Phenotype AMR GenesNo. of Phenotypic Resistant IsolatesNo. of Phenotypic Susceptible Isolates
Resistant by GenotypeSusceptible by GenotypeResistant by GenotypeSusceptible by Genotype
TetracyclinesTetracyclinetet(A), tet(D)638015
QuinolonesNalidixic_AcidoqxA, oqxB, qnrD1, qnrS11322618
TrimethoprimTrimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoledfrA12, dfrA14, dfrA15, dfrA171011929
PhenicolsChloramphenicolcmlA1_1, cmlA6, floR102047
ColistinColistinmcr-1, mcr-3.182148
MacrolidesAzithromycinmphA, mrx44051
NitrofuransNitrofurantoin-b01049
β-lactamaseAmpicillinampC, blaACC-1c, blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-65, blaTEM-116, blaTEM-1B120416
Cefotaxime
AminoglycosideAmikacinaac(3)-IIa, aac(3)-IIc, aadA, aadA2, aadA5, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-IIa, aph(6)-Id003227
Fosfomycins- afosA300158
Sulfonamides- asul1, sul2, sul3003128
a Antimicrobial resistance testing did not include the corresponding antibiotics. b No corresponding antimicrobial resistance gene was detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Sun, H.; Luo, M.; Xiong, Y.; Matussek, A.; Hu, B.; Bai, X. Genomic Characteristics of Stx2e-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Derived from Humans, Animals, and Meats. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121551

AMA Style

Yang X, Wu Y, Liu Q, Sun H, Luo M, Xiong Y, Matussek A, Hu B, Bai X. Genomic Characteristics of Stx2e-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Derived from Humans, Animals, and Meats. Pathogens. 2021; 10(12):1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Xi, Yannong Wu, Qian Liu, Hui Sun, Ming Luo, Yanwen Xiong, Andreas Matussek, Bin Hu, and Xiangning Bai. 2021. "Genomic Characteristics of Stx2e-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Derived from Humans, Animals, and Meats" Pathogens 10, no. 12: 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121551

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop