Next Article in Journal
Societal, Policy and Academic ‘Visions’ for the Future of the Marine Environment and Its Management, Exemplified in the Western and Northern Isles of Scotland
Next Article in Special Issue
One Voice Too Many: Echoes of Irony and Trauma in Oedipus the King
Previous Article in Journal
Past-Forwarding Ancient Calamities. Pathways for Making Archaeology Relevant in Disaster Risk Reduction Research
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Humanities 2017, 6(4), 80;

Let Seizing Truths Lie: Witnessing “Factions” in Lauren Slater’s Lying

Department of Communication, Literature and Arts, Mount Mercy University, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA
Received: 11 September 2017 / Revised: 18 October 2017 / Accepted: 24 October 2017 / Published: 31 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wounded: Studies in Literary and Cinematic Trauma)
Full-Text   |   PDF [230 KB, uploaded 1 November 2017]


In her memoir, Lying (2000), Lauren Slater fabricates most of her life narrative. Her text frustrates those who resent the combined fact and fiction—or “faction”—that she spins. This readerly response is understandable. Nevertheless, this article maintains that Slater lies in her memoir not to mislead readers but to witness traumas she struggles to access and articulate. Trauma and autobiographical theorists document the necessity of writing through—or “witnessing”—trauma to overcome it. When, however, a narrator is inhibited by what psychiatrists call “psychic constriction” (memory loss due to an inability to reconcile oneself with a painful past), she can become powerless to take the steps necessary to recover, as she cannot convey fully what she has suffered. Such is the case for Slater, who lies to witness ineffable traumas alongside her very inability to witness them. Lying also opens an important question about the reader’s role in traumatic witnessing: how does one respond to the traumatic testimony of an unreliable narrator? In answer, inasmuch as one may resist Slater’s memoir, one also has the ability to enter into and engage in her experience. In presenting this opportunity, Lying offers the writer-narrator and reader-respondent alike, a way to witness trauma together. View Full-Text
Keywords: trauma; memoir; witnessing; Lying; reader response trauma; memoir; witnessing; Lying; reader response
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wales Freedman, E. Let Seizing Truths Lie: Witnessing “Factions” in Lauren Slater’s Lying. Humanities 2017, 6, 80.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Humanities EISSN 2076-0787 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top