Next Article in Journal
Societal, Policy and Academic ‘Visions’ for the Future of the Marine Environment and Its Management, Exemplified in the Western and Northern Isles of Scotland
Next Article in Special Issue
One Voice Too Many: Echoes of Irony and Trauma in Oedipus the King
Previous Article in Journal
Past-Forwarding Ancient Calamities. Pathways for Making Archaeology Relevant in Disaster Risk Reduction Research
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Let Seizing Truths Lie: Witnessing “Factions” in Lauren Slater’s Lying

Department of Communication, Literature and Arts, Mount Mercy University, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA
Humanities 2017, 6(4), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/h6040080
Received: 11 September 2017 / Revised: 18 October 2017 / Accepted: 24 October 2017 / Published: 31 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wounded: Studies in Literary and Cinematic Trauma)
In her memoir, Lying (2000), Lauren Slater fabricates most of her life narrative. Her text frustrates those who resent the combined fact and fiction—or “faction”—that she spins. This readerly response is understandable. Nevertheless, this article maintains that Slater lies in her memoir not to mislead readers but to witness traumas she struggles to access and articulate. Trauma and autobiographical theorists document the necessity of writing through—or “witnessing”—trauma to overcome it. When, however, a narrator is inhibited by what psychiatrists call “psychic constriction” (memory loss due to an inability to reconcile oneself with a painful past), she can become powerless to take the steps necessary to recover, as she cannot convey fully what she has suffered. Such is the case for Slater, who lies to witness ineffable traumas alongside her very inability to witness them. Lying also opens an important question about the reader’s role in traumatic witnessing: how does one respond to the traumatic testimony of an unreliable narrator? In answer, inasmuch as one may resist Slater’s memoir, one also has the ability to enter into and engage in her experience. In presenting this opportunity, Lying offers the writer-narrator and reader-respondent alike, a way to witness trauma together. View Full-Text
Keywords: trauma; memoir; witnessing; Lying; reader response trauma; memoir; witnessing; Lying; reader response
MDPI and ACS Style

Wales Freedman, E. Let Seizing Truths Lie: Witnessing “Factions” in Lauren Slater’s Lying. Humanities 2017, 6, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6040080

AMA Style

Wales Freedman E. Let Seizing Truths Lie: Witnessing “Factions” in Lauren Slater’s Lying. Humanities. 2017; 6(4):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6040080

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wales Freedman, Eden. 2017. "Let Seizing Truths Lie: Witnessing “Factions” in Lauren Slater’s Lying" Humanities 6, no. 4: 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6040080

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop