Next Article in Journal
Plato’s and Aristotle’s Language Critique in Francisco Sanchez’s That Nothing Is Known
Next Article in Special Issue
The Consequences of Human Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Human Actions Illustrated in Zen’s Ox-Herding Pictures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Illuminating Our World: An Essay on the Unraveling of the Species Problem, with Assistance from a Barnacle and a Goose
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Humanities 2012, 1(3), 178-191;

Alone in the Void: Getting Real about the Tenuous and Fragile Nature of Modern Civilization

Department of Geography, University of Denver, Denver 80208, CO, USA
Barbara Hardy Institute, School of the Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia
Received: 23 October 2012 / Revised: 12 November 2012 / Accepted: 19 November 2012 / Published: 28 November 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Humanity’s Future)
Full-Text   |   PDF [466 KB, uploaded 28 November 2012]   |  


It is estimated that roughly seventy billion human beings have lived out their lives on planet earth. It is very unlikely that any of the seven billion currently enjoying this planet will be living out the rest of their life any place else. Nonetheless, many of our movies and much of our literature envisions easy space travel that is scientifically unrealistic. On July 24th, 2012 Adam Frank, a professor of physics and astronomy, wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times titled: Alone in the Void. This article posited that humanity (Homo sapiens) lives on a planet that is, for all intents and purposes, alone in a vast empty space. Reader comments to this editorial ranged from people who were very confident we were destined to colonize other galaxies to people who had little faith that humanity would even exist on the earth one hundred years from now. The reader’s responses mirror dominant and minority world views of economic theory. The dominant neo-classical economic paradigm is optimistic and growth oriented with faith in technological solutions to pressing social and environmental problems; whereas, the minority paradigm of ecological economics posits a need to move toward a steady state economy governed by the laws of thermodynamics as the preferred path for human progress. I side with ecological economics regarding what collective choices will result in a better future for humanity. View Full-Text
Keywords: Neo-classical economics; ecological economics; sustainability Neo-classical economics; ecological economics; sustainability

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sutton, P.C. Alone in the Void: Getting Real about the Tenuous and Fragile Nature of Modern Civilization. Humanities 2012, 1, 178-191.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Humanities EISSN 2076-0787 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top