Next Article in Journal
The Migration of Career-Starter Hungarian Graduate Women to the Countries of the European Union
Next Article in Special Issue
Global Health Diplomacy Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Strategic Opportunity for Improving Health, Peace, and Well-Being in the CARICOM Region—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Going by an English Name: The Adoption and Use of English Names by Young Taiwanese Adults
Open AccessArticle

Overselling Globalization: The Misleading Conflation of Economic Globalization and Immigration, and the Subsequent Backlash

1
Department of Sociology, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
2
School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2020, 9(5), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050061
Received: 20 January 2020 / Revised: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 22 April 2020 / Published: 26 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reshaping the World: Rethinking Borders)
Many think that immigration is something caused by globalization, and some subsequently blame immigrants for the increased inequalities produced by economic globalization. Xenophobic nationalism has gained popularity around the world, further increasing racial tensions but without addressing the underlying causes of growing socioeconomic inequality, which this paper strives to show is caused by economic policies, not immigration. This paper argues that the apparent retreat from globalization arises from the flawed conceptualization of “globalization” as a bundle of different processes. This study analyzes early framings of economic globalization and shows how it has been linked, for political reasons, to increased migration, diversity, and open borders. Coining the term ”globalization” was not just naming ongoing social change, but it became part of the branding of an elite ideological policy project. The popular framing of globalization purposely entangled independent phenomena such as free trade policies, the expansion of the internet, cosmopolitan identities, and international migration. These couplings brought together neoliberal conservatives and liberal cosmopolitans. Given the current backlash, it is essential to distinguish migration from policies favoring trade and capital movement across borders. It is noteworthy to remember that immigration is something that preceded globalization. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate how migration became entangled with globalization in the popular imagination. View Full-Text
Keywords: anti-immigration; neoliberalism; populism; xenophobia; globalists; borders anti-immigration; neoliberalism; populism; xenophobia; globalists; borders
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Castañeda, E.; Shemesh, A. Overselling Globalization: The Misleading Conflation of Economic Globalization and Immigration, and the Subsequent Backlash. Soc. Sci. 2020, 9, 61.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop