Next Article in Journal
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) as a Footprint for Tutoring Systems: A Model of ABA Approach Applied to Olfactory Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
The TACL Model: A Framework for Safeguarding Children with a Disability in Sport
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Framework to Inform Protective Support and Supportive Protection in Child Protection and Welfare Practice and Supervision
Open AccessArticle

Professional Values Challenged by Case Management—Theorizing Practice in Child Protection with Reflexive Practitioners

1
Department of Social Work, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
2
Department of Social Work, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Postboks 400, 2418 Elverum, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2020, 9(4), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9040044
Received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 31 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 8 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Debates and Developments in Child Protection)
In this article, we theorize and reflect based on former research into professional practice and discretion as well as use some results from working together with practitioners in child protection services to explore the phenomenon of non-performing. Regulation lies at the heart of the contemporary child protection discourse. On the one hand we have seen a trend towards systematization of assessment content and procedures, on the other hand it is assumed that rational management approaches can secure consistency of performance. Social workers may be weary of the constraints all this imposes, but seem generally content to comply. Our reasoning was that social workers in child protection should be helped to get to grips with modifications to practice so that multi-challenged families could be accorded priority. These changes would include a reframing of assessment to take account of family needs as well as the needs of children. Follow-up would also require much more attention. Additionally, the choice of help provided for children and families would have to come into better focus, despite the limitations often experienced in practice. The question we asked was whether these types of reframing could be fostered within local child welfare units. We conducted a field trial in which child protection units were encouraged to reframe their practices, with the support of an expert group. The idea was to enhance and enable innovation through the combination of a more thorough dialogue with the families involved, as well as critical reflection based on available knowledge related to the identified challenges. We do a critical discussion of the work and the results from this in order to enhance knowledge on innovation in child protection. View Full-Text
Keywords: child protection; social work; complexity theory child protection; social work; complexity theory
MDPI and ACS Style

Marthinsen, E.; Clifford, G.; Fauske, H.; Lichtwarck, W. Professional Values Challenged by Case Management—Theorizing Practice in Child Protection with Reflexive Practitioners. Soc. Sci. 2020, 9, 44.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop