Next Article in Journal
Fathers’ Parental Leave Uptake in Belgium and Sweden: Self-Evident or Subject to Employment Characteristics?
Next Article in Special Issue
Diverse Citizenship? Food Sovereignty and the Power of Acting Otherwise
Previous Article in Journal
Subterranean Detention and Sanctuary from below: Canada’s Carceral Geographies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ecological Citizens with a Movie Camera: Communitarian and Agonistic Environmental Documentaries
Article

Real-World Sustainable Citizenship between Political Consumerism and Material Practices

1
Education and Social Sciences, School of Humanities, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
2
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, University of Siegen, 57072 Siegen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(11), 311; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110311
Received: 27 September 2019 / Revised: 28 October 2019 / Accepted: 8 November 2019 / Published: 12 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rethinking Environmental Citizenship for Grassroots Politics )
While the number of theoretical concepts surrounding sustainable citizenship, political consumerism and ethical lifestyles is rising continuously, this article is interested in how citizens themselves delineate sustainable citizenship through their practices. Asking which contours real-world sustainable citizenship has, we draw on the practice turn. From this perspective, sustainable citizenship might be an empirical nexus of material practices, like buying organic products or sharing goods. These practices rely on dispositions that include practical rules, attitudes and political values. With survey data from Germany (N = 1350) and using principle component analysis, we reconstruct sustainable citizenship through stable and widespread real-world patterns. The results suggest that sustainable citizenship is a relatively coherent, nonetheless hybrid bundle of performances and dispositions. Real-world sustainable citizenship most resembles political consumerism, but consists overall of three distinct practices: sustainable purchasing, reduced consumption, and green mobility. All three are shown to be connected to engaged citizenship norms and the intention to advance social-ecological change. However, social class seems to prevent some citizens particularly from applying sustainable purchasing, while age and infrastructures constrain green mobility. Altogether, our results show that citizens from all social backgrounds practice sustainable citizenship. Yet they do so through different forms of practices, adjusted to their capabilities. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable citizenship; sustainable consumption; boycotting; buycotting; practice theory; ecological values; green consumer behavior sustainable citizenship; sustainable consumption; boycotting; buycotting; practice theory; ecological values; green consumer behavior
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zorell, C.V.; Yang, M. Real-World Sustainable Citizenship between Political Consumerism and Material Practices. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110311

AMA Style

Zorell CV, Yang M. Real-World Sustainable Citizenship between Political Consumerism and Material Practices. Social Sciences. 2019; 8(11):311. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zorell, Carolin V., and Mundo Yang. 2019. "Real-World Sustainable Citizenship between Political Consumerism and Material Practices" Social Sciences 8, no. 11: 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110311

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop