Next Article in Journal
Can We Rely on Self-Assessments of Sense of Coherence? The Effects of Socially Desirable Responding on the Orientation to Life Questionnaire (OLQ) Responses
Next Article in Special Issue
Information Disorder and Self-Regulation in Europe: A Broader Non-Economistic Conception of Self-Regulation
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Freedom of Expression, Secularism and Defamation of Religion: The Case of Charlie Hebdo
Open AccessCommunication

On Political Correctness

Department of International Law, Ecclesiastical Law and Philosophy of Law, Carlos III University of Madrid, 28903 Getafe, Madrid, Spain
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(10), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100277
Received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 15 September 2019 / Accepted: 24 September 2019 / Published: 1 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Democracy, Free Speech and Minorities)
This paper aims to analyse the arguments in favour and against applying Political Correctness policies on campus, especially on the curricula. The arguments in favour that will be studied are the criticism of the canon and the fair representation of minorities. The arguments against are that Political Correctness is a threat to freedom of expression, academic freedom and its methodology is problematic. View Full-Text
Keywords: Political Correctness; University; canon; classics; sexism; racism; homophobia; freedom; equality; diversity Political Correctness; University; canon; classics; sexism; racism; homophobia; freedom; equality; diversity
MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez de la Fuente, O. On Political Correctness. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 277.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
  • Externally hosted supplementary file 1
    Doi: 0000-0002-3708-846X
Back to TopTop