Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Nonviolence and Religion: Creating a Post-Secular Narrative with Aldo Capitini
Previous Article in Journal
The Portrayal of Families across Generations in Disney Animated Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oil and Gas Rents and Civilian Violence in the Middle East and North Africa, 1990–2004: A Resource Curse, or Rentier Peace?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(3), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7030048

Sharing Lessons between Peace Processes: A Comparative Case Study on the Northern Ireland and Korean Peace Processes

Irish School of Ecumenics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
Received: 9 February 2018 / Revised: 6 March 2018 / Accepted: 16 March 2018 / Published: 20 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Politics of Peace and Conflict)
Full-Text   |   PDF [283 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]

Abstract

In both Northern Ireland and Korea, the euphoria following significant breakthroughs towards peace in the late 1990s and early 2000s turned into deep frustration when confronted by continuous stalemates in implementing the agreements. I explore the two peace processes by examining and comparing the breakthroughs and breakdowns of both, in order to identify potential lessons that can be shared for a sustainable peace process. Using a comparative case study, I demonstrate the parallels in historical analyses of why the agreements in the late 1990s and early 2000s in Northern Ireland and Korea were expected to be more durable than those of the 1970s. I also examine the differences between the two peace processes in the course of addressing major challenges for sustaining the two processes: disarmament; relationships between hard-line parties; cross-community initiatives. These parallels and differences inform which lessons can be shared between Northern Ireland and Korea to increase the durability of the peace processes. The comparative case study finds that the commitment of high-level leadership in both conflict parties to keeping negotiation channels open for dialogue and to allowing space for civic engagement is crucial in a sustainable peace process, and that sharing lessons between the two peace processes can be beneficial in finding opportunities to overcome challenges and also for each process to be reminded of lessons from its own past experience. View Full-Text
Keywords: Northern Ireland; Korea; peace process; peacebuilding; comparative peace processes Northern Ireland; Korea; peace process; peacebuilding; comparative peace processes
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, D.J. Sharing Lessons between Peace Processes: A Comparative Case Study on the Northern Ireland and Korean Peace Processes. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 48.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top