Next Article in Journal
When Academic Technology Fails: Effects of Students’ Attributions for Computing Difficulties on Emotions and Achievement
Previous Article in Journal
Postfeminist Masculinity: The New Disney Norm?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(11), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110222

Risk Society and Anti-Politics in the Fracking Debate

School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Received: 17 September 2018 / Revised: 30 October 2018 / Accepted: 31 October 2018 / Published: 6 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [593 KB, uploaded 6 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

Fracking in the United Kingdom has yet to reach full industrial development, but it is still subject to significant opposition. This study uses Beck’s risk society theory and anti-politics to examine the views voiced by opponents to fracking in Yorkshire, England. A qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interviews with protesters and local newspaper reports were evaluated to provide a thematic analysis. The study drew upon discourse analysis and framing literature to reveal discourses within the interviews. Although there are signs of post-materialist concerns with the environment, these issues did not dominate the discussion. Scientists were not held responsible for the risks involved in fracking. Instead, the economic greediness of politicians and austerity measures were perceived as putting the environment and human health at risk. Interviewees thought fossil fuel energy production was economically advantaged over more sustainable energy and jobs in the low carbon economy. Protesters’ trust in politicians had been eroded, but faith in democracy remained. It is argued that the consensual post-politics of risk society have not led to a reinvigoration of democratic debate. Instead anti-politics have taken place, due to the frustration of citizens. Protesters wanted a citizen-led deliberative approach to the concerns raised. Such a process would have to go beyond the consensual, and recognise the inherently agonistic process of democracy if it is to succeed. View Full-Text
Keywords: fracking; risk society; anti-politics; climate change; post-politics fracking; risk society; anti-politics; climate change; post-politics
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Drake, F. Risk Society and Anti-Politics in the Fracking Debate. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 222.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top