Next Article in Journal
Do Police Officers in the USA Protect and Serve All Citizens Equally?
Next Article in Special Issue
Signalling the ‘Multi-Local’ University? The Place of the City in the Growth of London-Based Satellite Campuses, and the Implications for Social Stratification
Previous Article in Journal
How to Divide Paid Work and Unpaid Care between Parents? Comparison of Attitudes in 22 Western Countries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting the Issues of Access to Higher Education and Social Stratification through the Case of Refugees: A Comparative Study of Spaces of Opportunity for Refugee Students in Germany and England
Open AccessArticle

Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities?

1
Institute of Education, University College London and Birkbeck, University of London, 26 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DQ, UK
2
Teachers College, Columbia University, Box 11, 525 W. 120th St., New York, NY 10027, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(10), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100189
Received: 2 August 2018 / Revised: 14 September 2018 / Accepted: 17 September 2018 / Published: 9 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Stratification and Inequality in Access to Higher Education)
A hallmark of recent higher education policy in developed economies is the move towards quasi-markets involving greater student choice and provider competition, underpinned by cost-sharing policies. This paper examines the idealizations and illusions of student choice and marketization in higher education policy in England, although the overall conclusions have relevance for other countries whose higher education systems are shaped by neoliberal thinking. First, it charts the evolution of the student-choice rationale through an analysis of government commissioned reports, white papers, and legislation, focusing on policy rhetoric and the purported benefits of increasing student choice and provider competition. Second, the paper tests the predictions advanced by the student-choice rationale—increased and wider access, improved institutional quality, and greater provider responsiveness to the labour market—and finds them largely not met. Finally, the paper explores how conceptual deficiencies in the student-choice model explain why the idealization of student choice has largely proved illusionary. Government officials have narrowly conceptualized students as rational calculators primarily weighing the economic costs and benefits of higher education and the relative quality of institutions and programs. There is little awareness that student choices are shaped by several other factors as well and that these vary considerably by social background. The paper concludes that students’ choices are socially constrained and stratified, reproducing and legitimating social inequality. View Full-Text
Keywords: higher education; social inequality; choice; quasi-markets; student financial aid; part-time students; marketization; neoliberalism higher education; social inequality; choice; quasi-markets; student financial aid; part-time students; marketization; neoliberalism
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Callender, C.; Dougherty, K.J. Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities? Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100189

AMA Style

Callender C, Dougherty KJ. Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities? Social Sciences. 2018; 7(10):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Callender, Claire; Dougherty, Kevin J. 2018. "Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities?" Soc. Sci. 7, no. 10: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100189

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop