Next Article in Journal
Class and Gender Relations in the Welfare State: The Contradictory Dictates of the Norm of Female Autonomy
Next Article in Special Issue
Science Possible Selves and the Desire to be a Scientist: Mindsets, Gender Bias, and Confidence during Early Adolescence
Previous Article in Journal
New Zealand Prostitutes’ Collective—An Example of a Successful Policy Actor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gendered Perceptions of Cultural and Skill Alignment in Technology Companies
Article

Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus

Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Maria Charles and Sarah Thébaud
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(2), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020047
Received: 10 September 2016 / Revised: 6 April 2017 / Accepted: 21 April 2017 / Published: 10 May 2017
Although women graduate from college at higher rates than men, they remain underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This study examines whether women react to failing a STEM weed-out course by switching to a non-STEM major and graduating with a bachelor’s degree in a non-STEM field. While competitive courses designed to weed out potential STEM majors are often invoked in discussions around why students exit the STEM pipeline, relatively little is known about how women and men react to failing these courses. We use detailed individual-level data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS) Postsecondary Transcript Study (PETS): 1988–2000 to show that women who failed an introductory calculus course are substantially less likely to earn a bachelor’s degree in STEM. In doing so, we provide evidence that weed-out course failure might help us to better understand why women are less likely to earn degrees. View Full-Text
Keywords: higher education; gender; STEM; inverse probability weighting higher education; gender; STEM; inverse probability weighting
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanabria, T.; Penner, A. Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020047

AMA Style

Sanabria T, Penner A. Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus. Social Sciences. 2017; 6(2):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanabria, Tanya, and Andrew Penner. 2017. "Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus" Social Sciences 6, no. 2: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020047

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop