Next Article in Journal
Limits of Religious Analogy: The Example of Celebrity
Next Article in Special Issue
Local Constructions of Vulnerability and Resilience in the Context of Climate Change. A Comparison of Lübeck and Rostock
Previous Article in Journal
Intercorrelations of Intimacy and Identity Dating Goals with Relationship Behaviors and Satisfaction among Young Heterosexual Couples
Previous Article in Special Issue
Once You Are In You Might Need to Get Out: Adaptation and Adaptability in Volatile Labor Markets—the Case of Musical Actors

On Resilience

Department of Sociology, Columbia University, 606 W. 122nd Street, New York, NY 10027, USA
Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(1), 60-70;
Received: 13 September 2013 / Revised: 3 January 2014 / Accepted: 16 January 2014 / Published: 10 February 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Constructing Resilience, Negotiating Vulnerability)
This commentary reviews key themes posed by papers in this Special Issue and points to open questions. For example, does resilience in socio-technical systems degrade with use or, like immune systems, is resilience upgraded with use? Similarly, is resilience about responding in the face of the rare event? Or, is it being prepared for the rare event? Is it useful to think about the evolution of resilience? What are the risks posed by models of risk? That is, do models to reduce vulnerability to risk, increase vulnerability? What is the role of reflexivity in the analysis of resilience? View Full-Text
Keywords: resilience; models of risk; risk of models; observation theory; reflexive modeling resilience; models of risk; risk of models; observation theory; reflexive modeling
MDPI and ACS Style

Stark, D. On Resilience. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 60-70.

AMA Style

Stark D. On Resilience. Social Sciences. 2014; 3(1):60-70.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stark, David. 2014. "On Resilience" Social Sciences 3, no. 1: 60-70.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop