Next Article in Journal
Gender Equality, Human Development, and PISA Results over Time
Previous Article in Journal
‘You Owe It to Yourself, Everyone You Love and to Our Beleaguered NHS to Get Yourself Fit and Well’: Weight Stigma in the British Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Thematic Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Contribution of Socio-Demographic Factors to Walking Behavior Considering Destination Types; Case Study: Temuco, Chile

by
Mohammad Paydar
1,* and
Asal Kamani Fard
2
1
Escuela de Arquitectura Temuco, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Mayor, Av. Alemania 281, Temuco 4780000, Chile
2
Universidad Católica del Maule, San Miguel, Talca 3605000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(12), 479; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120479
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 9 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Community and Urban Sociology)

Abstract

:
The improvement of walking contributes to maintain the minimum rate of physical activity and therefore the residents’ public health. This is while the amount of walking in daily transport of inhabitants has significantly decreased during the last decades in Temuco, Chile. In addition, the impact of socio-demographic as well as social factors on the improvement of walking behavior has been paid less attention in previous studies. This study aims to examine the contribution of socio-demographic factors and the active family environment to walking behavior as well as walking level based on three types of destinations in Temuco. The results of “Encuesta Origin Destino” (EOD) in Temuco were used to examine the objectives. It was found that a high percentage of people who walk in Temuco belong to low-income families. Moreover, most of the people who walk, do not have a driver’s license nor private cars in their household. Certain socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, driver’s license, private cars, and access to TV were found to have associations with overall walking behavior as well as walking level depending on three different destination types. Furthermore, the correlation was found between walking behavior and active family environment. These findings were discussed and their implications were addressed as well.

1. Introduction

Non-motorized means of travel including walking and cycling are the most sustainable modes of transport due to their accessibility, lower pollution, and lower costs (Xiao et al. 2020; Harms et al. 2014). Furthermore, improvement of walking contributes to maintain the minimum rate of physical activity and therefore improves the residents’ public health (Paydar et al. 2020a). The need to improve active travel and especially walking—as a daily travel mode—was also emphasized in the recent COVID-19 pandemic while using of public transport has caused several challenges for the residents’ health. Walking has still remained the main mode of transport to date among low-income groups in Chile (Herrmann-Lunecke et al. 2020). However, the percentage of walking in daily transport of the residents in Temuco, Chile, has strongly decreased during last decades (Actualizacion Plan De Transporte Temuco Y Desarrollo De Anteproyecto, ETAPA II 2017). For instance, the number of trips by private cars has increased 7% from 2003 to 2013 versus a 5% decrease in walking trips during this time in this city (Actualizacion Plan De Transporte Temuco Y Desarrollo De Anteproyecto, ETAPA II 2017). Therefore, walking behavior needs to be significantly improved in this southern medium-sized city of Chile.
According to ecological models, a person’s walking behavior is influenced by a complex relationship between environmental (physical/social) and individual characteristics (Krogstad et al. 2015; Rind et al. 2015; Van Cauwenberg et al. 2014). In this regard, previous studies have demonstrated the impact of several personal as well as socio-demographic, social, and built environment factors in improvement of walking behavior (Copperman and Bhat 2007; Inoue et al. 2010; Mesters et al. 2014; Paydar and Kamani Fard 2016; Paydar et al. 2017; Paydar and Kamani Fard 2021b; Van Cauwenberg et al. 2012; Yun 2019). However, the previous studies on walking behavior mostly focused on the contribution of built environment to walking behavior, whereas the role of socio-demographic as well as social factors in improvement of walking behavior has been less studied. In this regard, this study aims to investigate on the most relevant socio-demographic factors to walking behavior in Temuco in order to improve the walking behavior in this city. Understanding the relationships between socio-demographic factors and the level of walking behavior would help city/transport policy makers to find appropriate policies in congruent with such relationships in order to enhance the walking. Thus, the sustainable urban transport in each context would improve. This study also examines the relationship between walking behavior and physically active family environment as a recognized relevant social factor to walking by the previous studies (Booth et al. 2005; Troped et al. 2017). The conceptual framework of this study is shown in the Figure 1.
Furthermore, some of the previous studies on walking behavior have examined the relationship between walking behavior and its contributing factors based on specific goals of walking trips whether walking to/from work, walking to reach educational destinations, and other destinations as well (Craig et al. 2002; Plaut 2005; Sun et al. 2014, 2015). These studies suggest that the influence of different contributing factors to walking behavior may vary based on the purpose of the walking trips. Although these studies have shown the importance of the purpose of walking trips in regard to the contribution of different factors to walking behavior, this consideration has been done separately due to each type of destination. The current study also investigates the contribution of the selected factors to walking behavior based on different purposes of the walking trips simultaneously (Figure 1). This can be taken into account as one of the novelties of this study. The research questions of this study are as following:
(1)
What socio-demographic factors contribute to walking behavior in this city?
(2)
Does a physically active family environment contribute to walking behavior in Temuco?
(3)
How does the purpose of the walking trips influence the association between walking behavior and socio-demographic factors as well as physically active family environment?

2. Literature Review

In regard to socio-demographic factors, gender and age are found to be related to walking behavior (Mendes de Leon et al. 2009; Mesters et al. 2014). For instance, the level of walking is usually decreased for older people (Mesters et al. 2014). Education level is also correlated with the walking behavior (Menai et al. 2015; Mesters et al. 2014; Mendes de Leon et al. 2009). For instance, men with higher education level walk more (Mesters et al. 2014). Having a driver’s license is also associated with walking behavior (Copperman and Bhat 2007). Other studies found the relationships between walking and job, income, marital status, number of vehicles, number of adults, and body mass index (BMI) as well (Bicalho et al. 2018; Menai et al. 2015; Ory et al. 2016; Paydar et al. 2020b). Previous studies on walking behavior also demonstrated the relationships between the familiarity with walking environment and walking behavior (Van Cauwenberg et al. 2012).
Social environment refers to the influence that friends and family could have on an individual’s walking (Clark and Scott 2013). Most of the social factors related to walking first emerged in the physical activity literature and then were adapted to walking (Mesters et al. 2014). Previous research has consistently found that a supportive social environment increases physical activity and walking (Cleland et al. 2010; Stathi et al. 2012; Paydar and Kamani Fard 2021a, 2021c). Van Cauwenberg et al. (2014) found that walking for transportation positively correlates with interpersonal relationships, place attachments, frequency of contacts with neighbors, and social support. Among the social factors related to walking, a role model has been identified as a motivational factor for walking and physical activity (Harley et al. 2009; Mesters et al. 2014). Role models, in regard to walking, are people who walk and whose participation encourages others to become involved. The support of family and friends and having a partner or friends who are physically active is significantly associated with physical activity and walking (Darlow and Xu 2011; Harley et al. 2009). Among the indicators of role model, physically active family environment has a remarkable role in the encouragement of people to do more physical activity and walking (Booth et al. 2005). However, some studies did not find the positive influence of this factor on walking and overall physical activity (Mesters et al. 2014).
Furthermore, some of the previous studies on walking behavior focused on walking behavior based on a special purpose of walking trips especially walking to work and university. For instance, Craig et al. (2002) examined the relationship between walking to work and neighborhood design characteristics. Plaut (2005) examined the association between non-motorized commuting, including walking and cycling to work, and socio-demographic factors. Other studies have examined the relationships between walking behavior of university students and its contributing personal and built environmental factors (Lemieux and Godin 2009; Sun et al. 2014, 2015).
Finally, with respect to socio-demographic patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior in Chile, 19.8% of the Chilean population do not meet the minimum level of physical activity recommendations (150 min of physical activity per week) (Ministerio de Salud de Chile 2018; Celis-Morales et al. 2015). In addition, the prevalence of physical inactivity was higher in participants aged more than 65 years compared with the youngest age groups, and it was higher in women than in men (Celis-Morales et al. 2015). However, it was lower for participants with high—compared with low—education or income levels.

3. Materials and Methods

The information of Travel diary data taken from the Encuesta Origen Destino (EOD) Hogar y Viajes studies by the ministry of transport of Chile in 2013 was used to measure walking behavior and the relevant socio-demographic factors in the city of Temuco. Travel diary survey was applied by the previous studies to measure walking behavior and its relevant socio-demographic factors as well (Bagley and Mokhtarian 2002; Olsen et al. 2017). EOD is a general-purpose survey that covers a wide range of issues including transport and travel. The primary sampling unit was the household, which were selected randomly from all of the transport zones of Temuco; while the secondary sampling unit was a randomly selected individual member of the household, who acted as the respondent and completed two questionnaires regarding the information of the households (EOD Hogar) and their recent daily trips (EOD Viajes). Participants have completed a travel diary detailing all journeys undertaken in the day of travel registration. Each diary was divided into individual journey stages which describe each phase of a journey (e.g., one journey may include three stages: walk to bus stop, travel on bus, and walk to destination). For each journey stage, data collection included the origin, destination, purpose (assigned to all stages that comprised a given journey), distance, and the mode of the travel. Walking behavior could be measured for each participant if walking is included in his/her travel diary since walking was an attribute assigned to each journey stage. “EOD Hogar y Viajes” also provided the required information for socio-demographic variables such as household size, workers per household, adults per household, income (household or individual), number of vehicles, having a driver’s license, gender, employment status, and age. Continuous variables such as income have been transformed into the categorical variables as well. For instance, declared monthly income has been transformed into categorical variable based on the socioeconomic categorization in Chile. In addition, duration of living in the current residence has been used as the indicator of familiarity as people with more duration of living normally have more familiarity with the surrounding environments of their living places.
Using the EOD 2013, a sample of 1721 people who walk in their daily travel were selected in Temuco. Previous studies have demonstrated that the contribution of different factors to walking behavior differs based on the two types of walking that includes walking to reach a destination and walking for recreation (Kang et al. 2017; Perchoux et al. 2019). Accordingly, due to the challenge of aggregating the data of these two types of walking and few number of walking trips for recreation (85 people with recreational walking trips), the recreational walking trips were eliminated from further consideration. Therefore, 1636 people were finally selected as those who walk to reach different types of destinations in this city.
Role model and its selected indicator as physically active family environment was measured objectively through the “proportion of walking trips to total trips in each household”. This measurement shows the level of being active in each household since walking is a type of physical activity that could encourage in the members of each household to walk more. SPSS software version 23.0 was used to analyze the data (Carrapatoso et al. 2017; Zandieh et al. 2017). Finally, to predict a dependent variable from the independent variables, multiple regression analysis was applied. Several models have been made to reach the best-fitting models in terms of explanatory power of the models and the multi-collinearity of the variables (VIF < 5).

4. Results

4.1. Descriptive Statistics

The descriptive statistics of the socio-demographic variables and familiarity are shown in Table 1. Female residents (56.3%) walk more than male residents (43.6%) in this city. In addition, most of the respondents do not work or they are retired (63.7%). This could be explained by the sampling of EOD survey that had collected data from all of the household members, and normally one person is financially responsible for the family. The highest percentage in regard to the age belongs to the respondents between 19 and 29 years old (17.8%). From those respondents who have income, most of them belong to a low-income group, since 57.5% of the respondents who have income do receive less than three hundred thousand Chilean pesos monthly. Majority of the respondents live in houses (89.7%) as compared to those who live in apartments (8.8%), and most of them are owners of their houses and apartments (70.7%). In addition, majority of the respondents have neither a driver’s license (83.5%) nor private cars (66.9%). Furthermore, majority of the respondents are those who have their primary and high school degrees (91.7%). Finally, the average number of family members is 4.12 persons in each household, and majority of the respondents have high familiarity with walking environment as most of them have the duration of living more than 20 years in their homes (35.4%). Regarding the purpose of the walking trips, the highest percentages of walking trips belong to walking to reach the educational destinations, walking to/from work, and walking for shopping, respectively (Table 1). Accordingly, these three types of walking are selected to examine the contribution of socio-demographic and social factors to walking behavior based on the purpose of the walking trips.

4.2. The Factors Influencing Walking Behavior (Overall Walking)

Table 2 shows the results of the multiple regression analysis considering the walking behavior and the selected independent variables of this study (Figure 1). R2 (0.087) shows that the independent variables of this study show an explicative power of almost 0.087 to predict the dependent variable (walking behavior). This rate of R2 generally shows a rather low overall contribution of the independent variables to walking behavior. However, the correlations identified among some of the independent variables with walking behavior are considerable.
Age has shown the highest significant positive correlation with walking behavior among the socio-demographic variables (β = 0.135, p = 0.000), which shows that older people significantly walk more than younger ones in this city. The results also show that men significantly walk more than women (β = 0.103, p = 0.000). The respondents who work and have a monthly income walk significantly more than those who do not work (β = 0.092, p = 0.005). People who live in apartments walk significantly more than those who live in houses (β = −0.046, p = 0.075). In addition, a higher number of people in each household contributes to improve the level of walking and vice versa (β = 0.122, p = 0.000). Furthermore, those who do not have a driver’s license walk significantly more than those who have it and vice versa (β = −0.057, p = 0.005). Similarly, people with a higher number of vehicles in their household walk significantly less than others and vice versa (β = −0.043, p = 0.098). Among the social factors, “proportion of walking trips to total trips in household” showed a significant positive correlation with walking behavior (β = 0.176, p = 0.000). This association shows that higher percentage of walking trips to total trips in household contribute to increase the walking behavior.

4.3. The Factors That Impact on Walking Behavior Considering Three Types of Destination

It was previously explained that three types of walking (based on the types of destinations) form the largest number of walking trips. It includes walking to reach educational destinations, walking to/from work, and walking for shopping. Table 3 shows the results of three models on the multiple regression analyses between walking behavior—separated based on these types of walking—and the selected independent variables of this study.
Among these models, R2 (0.154)—referring to walking for shopping—shows an explicative power of almost 0.154 to predict the dependent variable (walking behavior), which is the highest rate among those three models. The respondents who work and have monthly income walk significantly more for shopping than those who do not work (β = 0.173, p = 0.011). In addition, “number of trips in the household” showed a significant positive correlation with walking for shopping among the socio-demographic variables. This shows that a higher number of daily trips in the household contributes to an increases in the walking for shopping (β = 0.167, p = 0.054). Finally, among the social factors, “proportion of walking trips to total trips in each household” showed a significant positive correlation with walking for shopping (β = 0.295, p = 0.000). This confirms that higher percentages of walking trips from total trips in the household contributes to increase the walking for shopping.
In regard to walking to reach educational destinations (R2: 0.125), men significantly walk more than woman (β = 0.093, p = 0.035). Older people walk significantly more to reach educational destinations (β = 0.143, p = 0.057). People who do not have a driver’s license walk significantly more to reach educational destinations comparing to those who do have it and vice versa (β = −0.177, p = 0.000). In addition, people who live in apartments walk significantly more to reach educational destinations than those who live in houses (β = −0.114, p = 0.017). Finally, people with less than one year duration of living in their home walk significantly more to reach educational destinations than those with duration of more than 20 years living in their house. In other words, people with less familiarity walk more to reach the educational destination than people with more familiarity with the surrounding environment.
In regard to walking to/from work (R2: 0.143), men significantly walk more than women (β = 0.141, p = 0.023). Older people walk significantly more to/from work (β = 0.144, p = 0.027). Those who have TV in their home walk significantly less to/from work (β = −0.110, p = 0.071). People who do not have a driver’s license walk significantly more to work than those who have it and vice versa (β = −0.137, p = 0.052). In addition, the people who live in the apartments walk significantly more to/from work comparing to those who live in houses (β = −0.159, p = 0.012). Furthermore, people who have lived between 11 and 20 years in their houses, walk significantly more to work than those who have lived more than 20 years in their houses (β = 0.124, p = 0.005). Finally, more “proportion of walking trips to total trips in household” contributes to walk more to/from work (β = 0.172, p = 0.009).

5. Discussion

Descriptive analysis showed that most of the respondents who have an income belong to low-income families. This shows that a high percentage of people who walk in Temuco belong to low-income families. This is in line with the results of Herrmann-Lunecke et al. (2020), who found that walking is a prominent mode of transport especially for low-income groups in Chile. In addition, the overall walking increases among the people who have a job and receive monthly income as well. These results should be considered in the context of low-to-middle income families as the majority of those who walk in this city. Those who work and have monthly income are responsible for their family and they need to be more active to meet the needs of other family members; consequently, they walk more as compared to their other family members.
The average number of vehicles in the household of those who walk in Temuco is less than 1 (0.39) and the majority of people who walk do not have a driver’s license (83.5%). These results show that owning a private car has no fundamental role in the lives of people who walk in this city. In addition, the overall walking, walking to reach educational destinations and walking to/from work increases considering those who do not have a driver’s license. Similarly, the overall walking increases with a lower number of vehicles in each household. The previous studies support the finding of this study as they have found that active travel as well as walking decreases with a higher number of cars in the household and having a driver’s license (Clark and Scott 2013; Clark et al. 2014). In addition, these results show an incompatibility between walking and using private cars in the daily transport of the people especially for commuting trips including walking to work as well as educational destinations. For instance, with respect to walking to reach the educational destinations, among younger ones and millennials in this city: Most of the people who walk to reach educational destinations are younger ones and millennials who were born after 1980/1990. Both of these factors—having a driver’s license and more cars in the household—contribute to less walking of younger people and millennials in Temuco. Taking into account the correlations of both of these factors—number of private cars and having a driver’s license—with overall walking as well as commuting, the walking trips lets us infer that the people may have more tendency to use private cars than walking with respect to their commuting trips. However, the current research did not address other modes of transportation such as private cars, and this initial inference needs further investigation by the future studies.
In addition, it was found that the overall walking and two types of walking, including walking to/from work and walking to reach educational destinations, are enhanced with respect to the people who live in apartments as compared to houses. Temuco is traditionally a flat city with few apartments and the construction of these apartment buildings started in recent decades. In addition, most of the apartments in this city are located near the city center, where there is a concentration of shops, malls, and different activities. Construction of apartments at/near the city center is one of the components of a compact city, and the compact city is one of the well-known approaches of sustainable urban development (Kotulla et al. 2019). This approach also leads to an increase in the sustainable transport modes such as walking and cycling (Stevenson et al. 2016). These results show that the approach of creation of a compact city through building apartments in Temuco was successful in terms of enhancement of general walking trips as well as commuting walking trips as one of the components of sustainable urban transport. This is especially important considering that there has been much traffic in different streets of this city especially in the peak hours, and the commuting walking trips plays a key role in the pattern of urban daily movement especially during peak hours. Thus, the approach of a compact city around the center of Temuco is to be maintained and enhanced in order to improve walking and sustainable urban transport in this city.
Moreover, older people significantly walk more in Temuco. Considering the types of walking trips based on the destination types, older people also significantly walk more to/from work and educational destinations as well. Further analysis also showed that such a correlation between age and walking behavior is related to the age groups between adolescent to adults until 60 years old, and not more than this age group. This is in contrast with the results of previous studies which have found that physical activity as well as walking behavior decreases with age (Berger et al. 2005; Mesters et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2013). In addition, our analysis showed that the majority of people who walk to reach educational destinations are adolescents as well as young people (10 to 29 years old; 89%). One interpretation in regard to the influence of age on walking to educational destinations is that the adolescents especially in the earlier stage (early adolescence; 11 to 14 years old) are not able to ward off potential health risks during walking. Thus, they have less possibility of choosing walking independently from their family and consequently walk less than other adolescents as well as young people.
Furthermore, men significantly walk more as compared to women. Likewise, men significantly walk more than women to/from work and to reach the educational destinations. Previous studies support the impact of gender on walking behavior (Foster et al. 2004; Mendes de Leon et al. 2009). In addition, this result is in line with the finding of the National Health Survey (2009–2010), which found that women are more inactive as compared to men in Chile (Celis-Morales et al. 2015). In this regard, future studies may also investigate on the barriers to women’s walking in this city.
The people who have a TV in their home walk significantly less to/from work. This is an interesting result which shows the negative impact of technological equipment on physical activities and walking. Perhaps the first perceived reason is that entertaining the residents with television leads to sedentary behaviors. This is supported by previous studies which have found that watching more TV contributes to more sedentary behavior and decreases physical activities as well as walking, especially among elderly people and women (DiPietro et al. 2018; Hu et al. 2003). However, it is inferred that there may be other reasons rather than simply the direct effect of TV on sedentary behavior. In this regard, another reason may be related to the types of presented programs and news by different TV channels in Chile which may have a negative effect on their level of walking. For instance, one of these negative effects on level of walking may be related to exaggerated presentation of insecurity by different TV channels’ news. Future studies may focus more on the reason/s for such findings in this city.
People with less duration of living and less familiarity with the surrounding environments walk more to reach educational destinations. This result is in contrast to the previous finding with respect to relationships between familiarity and the level of walking. To our knowledge, only the positive influence of more familiarity with walking environment on walking level has been found in previous studies (Harms et al. 2019; Van Cauwenberg et al. 2012). One interpretation is that most of the people who walk to educational destinations are adolescents, and people with this age have more curiosity to explore the environments; thus, they walk more to explore the environments and enhance their familiarity with the surrounding environments. This inference is partially supported by the affordance theory with respect to adolescents, in which the functional significance of environments is very different for adolescents than other age groups and they have more curiosity to explore the environments and have better adaptation of these environments with their needs (Clark and Uzzell 2002; Paydar and Kamani Fard 2021c).
Finally, the higher “proportion of walking trips to total trips in household” contributes to increase the overall walking, as well as two types of walking including walking for shopping and walking to/from work. Increasing the proportion of walking trips from the overall trips of the family members encourages them to walk more. This is in line with the findings of the previous studies which have showed the positive impact of role models and active family environment on encouragement and increasing the physical activity and walking (Booth et al. 2005; Darlow and Xu 2011; Harley et al. 2009). The policy makers of this city need to pay attention to this motivational factor to enhance walking behavior in Temuco. This relationship shows the possibility of the association of other social factors with walking behavior in this city as well. This could be investigated further by future studies.

6. Limitations of the Study

This research is a part of a research project that was started in 2020. Due to the limitation of COVID-19 in terms of access to people and implementing research in the field, it was decided to use the information of EOD survey of 2013 as a part of the data of this research project. EOD 2013 is the latest survey regarding daily transport, implemented by the Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications, in Temuco, Chile. In this regard, the limitations of the study are the cross-sectional design and the measurement of walking behavior through a self-reported questionnaire. Self-report measurement requires the good memory of the participants and high estimation skills. Consequently, measurement errors may exist due to lack of valid recall (Matthews 2002). Another limitation of the study is the use of a long questionnaire to measure travel mode choice and the other variables, which may result in nonresponse and invalid results (Mesters et al. 2014).

7. Conclusions

While the amount of using private cars has increased in daily transport of people in the recent decades in Temuco, the amount of walking has remarkably decreased at the same time. This is while walking as the most sustainable transport mode is appropriate for the post-pandemic era especially, in such medium-sized city. This research aimed to study the most relevant socio-demographic factors to walking behavior and examine the contribution of active family environment and density to overall walking behavior as well as the level of walking based on three types of destinations. It was found that high percentages of people who walk in Temuco belong to low-income families. In addition, most of the people who walk in this city do not have a driver’s license nor private cars in their household. The impacts of several socio-demographic factors on walking behavior, including age, gender, education, monthly income, having job, type of house whether house or department, having a TV at home, and having a driver’s license, were analyzed in this study. One of the interesting results is that people who have a TV in their homes walk less to/from work. Another interesting result is that people with less duration of living and less familiarity with the surrounding environments walk significantly more to reach educational destinations.
In addition, the impacts of different socio-demographic and social factors on walking behavior were found based on three selected types of destinations. Furthermore, the association between walking behavior and active family environment was also found. These findings were discussed, and their implications were addressed as well. For instance, it was inferred that people may have the tendency to use the private cars rather than walk for their commuting trips in this city. This should be further investigated by future research.
One of the important implications of this study is in regard to the correlations between types of the residence, whether house or apartment, and overall walking as well as walking to/from work and to educational destinations. The people who live in apartments walk more compared to those who live in houses. These results show that the approach of a compact city that has been followed by policy makers—through the construction of high-rise buildings around the city center during the recent decades—has been successful in regard to enhancing the walking behavior in Temuco. Considering the traffic jam in many streets of Temuco, especially in peak traffic periods, this approach toward a compact city needs to be enhanced to improve the walking behavior and reinforce the sustainable transport in this city.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P.; methodology, M.P.; software, M.P.; validation, M.P.; formal analysis, M.P. and A.K.F.; investigation, M.P.; data curation, A.K.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and A.K.F.; writing—review and editing, M.P. and A.K.F.; supervision, M.P. and A.K.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support from the School of Architecture, Temuco, Universidad Mayor. We would also like to thank Javier Arangua Calzado, Director of the School of Architecture, Temuco, Universidad Mayor, for his support in finalizing this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Actualizacion Plan De Transporte Temuco Y Desarrollo De Anteproyecto, ETAPA II. 2017. Ministerio de Transportes y Telecomunicaciones. Chile: SECTRA. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagley, Michael N., and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. 2002. The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science 36: 279–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Berger, Geoff Der, Nanette Mutrie, and Mary Hannah. 2005. The impact of retirement on physical activity. Aging Ment Health 25: 181–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bicalho, Paula Gonçalves, Tatiane Géa-Horta, Alexandra Dias Moreira, Andrea Gazzinelli, and Gustavo Velasquez-Melendez. 2018. Association between sociodemographic and health factors and the practice of walking in a rural area. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 23: 1323–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Booth, Katie M., Megan M. Pinkston, and Walker S. Carlos Poston. 2005. Obesity and the built environment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 105: 110–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Carrapatoso, Susana, Paula Silva, Paulo Colaço, and Joana Carvalho. 2017. Perceptions of the Neighborhood Environment Associated With Walking at Recommended Intensity and Volume Levels in Recreational Senior Walkers. Journal of Housing For the Elderly 32: 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Celis-Morales, Carlos, Carlos Salas, Anas Alduhishy, Ruth Sanzana, María Adela Martínez, Ana Leiva, Ximena Diaz, Cristian Martínez, Cristian Álvarez, Jaime Leppe, and et al. 2015. Socio-demographic patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Chile: Results from the National Health Survey 2009–10. Journal of Public Health 38: e98–e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Clark, Andrew F., and Darren M. Scott. 2013. Does the social environment influence active travel? An investigation of walking in Hamilton, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography 31: 278–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clark, Andrew F., Darren M. Scott, and Niko Yiannakoulias. 2014. Examining the relationship between active travel, weather, and the built environment: A multilevel approach using a GPS-enhanced dataset. Transportation 41: 325–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Clark, Charlotte, and David Uzzell. 2002. The affordances of the home, neighbourhood, school and town centre for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22: 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cleland, Verity, Kylie Ball, Clare Hume, Anna Timperio, Abby C. King, and David Crawford. 2010. Individual, social and environmental correlates of physical activity among women living in socioeconmically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Social Science and Medicine 70: 2011–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Copperman, Rachel, and Chandra Bhat. 2007. An analysis of the determinants of children’s weekend physical activity participation. Transportation 34: 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Craig, Cora L., Ross C. Brownson, Sue E Cragg, and Andrea L. Dunn. 2002. Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining walking to work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23: 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Darlow, Susan D., and Xiaomeng Xu. 2011. The influence of close others’ exercise habits and perceived social support on exercise. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 12: 545–78. [Google Scholar]
  15. DiPietro, Loretta, Yichen Jin, Sameera Talegawkar, and Charles E Matthews. 2018. The Joint Associations of Sedentary Time and Physical Activity With Mobility Disability in Older People: The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 73: 532–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Foster, Charles, Melvyn Hillsdon, and Thorogood Thorogood. 2004. Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 58: 924–28. [Google Scholar]
  17. Harley, Amy, Mira Katz, Catherine Heaney, Dustin Duncan, Janet Buckworth, Angela Odoms-Young, and Sharla Willis. 2009. Social support and companionship among active African American women. American Journal of Health Behavior 33: 673–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harms, Ilse Mariska, Joke H. van Dijken, Karel A. Brookhuis, and Dick de Waard. 2019. Walking Without Awareness. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Harms, Lucas, Luca Bertolini, and Marco te Brömmelstroet. 2014. Spatial and social variations in cycling patterns in a mature cycling country exploring differences and trends. Journal of Transport & Health 1: 232–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Herrmann-Lunecke, Marie Geraldine, Rodrigo Mora, and Lake Sagaris. 2020. Persistence of walking in Chile: Lessons for urban sustainability. Transport Reviews 40: 135–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, Frank B., Tricia Y. Li, Graham A. Colditz, Walter C. Willett, and JoAnn E. Manson. 2003. Television Watching and Other Sedentary Behaviors in Relation to Risk of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Women. JAMA 289: 1785–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Inoue, Shigeru Yumiko Ohya, Yuko Odagiri, Tomoko Takamiya, Kaori Ishii, Makiko Kitabayashi, Kenichi Suijo, James Sallis, and Teruichi Shimomitsu. 2010. Association between Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Walking among Adults in 4 Cities in Japan. Journal of Epidemiology 20: 277–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kang, Bumjoon, Anne Moudon, Philip Hurvitz, and Brian E Saelens. 2017. Differences in behavior, time, location, and built environment between objectively measured utilitarian and recreational walking. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 57: 185–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kotulla, Theresa, Jon Martin Denstadli, Are Oust, and Elisabeth Beusker. 2019. What Does It Take to Make the Compact City Liveable for Wider Groups? Identifying Key Neighbourhood and Dwelling Features. Sustainability 11: 3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Krogstad, Julie Runde, Randi Hjorthol, and Aud Tennøy. 2015. Improving walking conditions for older adults. A three-step method investigation. European Journal of Ageing 12: 249–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lemieux, Mélanie, and Gaston Godin. 2009. How well do cognitive and environmental variables predict active commuting? The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 6: 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Matthews, Charles E. 2002. Use of self-report instruments to assess physical activity. In Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research. Edited by Greg Welk. Champaign: Human Kinetics, pp. 107–23. [Google Scholar]
  28. Menai, Mehdi, Hélène Charreire, Thierry Feuillet, Paul Salze, Christiane Weber, Christophe Enaux, Valentina A. Andreeva, Serge Hercberg, Julie-Anne Nazare, Camille Perchoux, and et al. 2015. Walking and cycling for commuting, leisure and errands: Relations with individual characteristics and leisure-time physical activity in a cross-sectional survey (the ACTI-Cités project). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12: 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mendes de Leon, Carlos F., Kathleen A. Cagney, Julia L. Bienias, Lisa L. Barnes, Kimberly A. Skarupski, Paul A. Scherr, and Denis A. Evans. 2009. Neighborhood social cohesion and disorder in relation to walking in community-dwelling older adults: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Aging and Health 21: 155–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Mesters, Ilse, Stefanie Wahl, and Hilde M Van Keulen. 2014. Socio-demographic, medical and social-cognitive correlates of physical activity behavior among older adults (45–70 years): A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 14: 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Ministerio de Salud de Chile. 2018. Encuesta Nacional de Salud (ENS): Contenido Informativo Descargable [Chilean National Health Survey (ENS): Informational Content] [WWW Document]. Available online: http://epi.minsal.cl/encuesta-ens-descargable/ (accessed on 27 August 2021).
  32. Olsen, Jonathan R., Richard Mitchell, Nanette Mutrie, Louise Foley, and David Ogilvie. 2017. Population levels of, and inequalities in, active travel: A national, cross-sectional study of adults in Scotland. Preventive Medicine Reports 8: 129–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ory, Marcia G., Samuel D. Towne, Jaewoong Won, Samuel N. Forjuoh, and Chanam Lee. 2016. Social and environmental predictors of walking among older adults. BMC Geriatrics 16: 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Paydar, Mohammad, and Asal Kamani Fard. 2016. Perceived legibility in relation to path choice of commuters in central business district. URBAN DESIGN International 21: 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Paydar, Mohammad, and Asal Kamani Fard. 2021a. The Contribution of Mobile Apps to the Improvement of Walking/Cycling Behavior Considering the Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 13: 10580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paydar, Mohammad, and Asal Kamani Fard. 2021b. The Hierarchy of Walking Needs and the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Paydar, Mohammad, and Asal Kamani Fard. 2021c. The impact of legibility and seating areas on social interaction in the neighbourhood park and plaza. Archnet-IJAR 15: 571–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paydar, Mohammad, Asal Kamani Fard, and Marzieh Khaghani. 2020a. Pedestrian Walkways for Health in Shiraz, Iran, the Contribution of Attitudes, and Perceived Environmental Attributes. Sustainability 12: 7263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paydar, Mohammad, Asal Kamani Fard, and Mohammad M. Khaghani. 2020b. Walking toward Metro Stations: The Contribution of Distance, Attitudes, and Perceived Built Environment. Sustainability 12: 10291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Paydar, Mohammad, Asal Kamani Fard, and Roya Etminani-Ghasrodashti. 2017. Perceived Security of Women in Relation To Their Path Choice toward Sustainable Neighbourhood in Santiago, Chile. Cities 60: 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perchoux, Camille, Ruben Brondeel, Rania Wasfi, Olivier Klein, Geoffrey Caruso, Julie Vallée, Sylvain Klein, Benoit Thierry, Martin Dijst, Basile Chaix, and et al. 2019. Walking, trip purpose, and exposure to multiple environments: A case study of older adults in Luxembourg. Journal of Transport & Health 13: 170–84. [Google Scholar]
  42. Plaut, Pnina O. 2005. Non-motorized commuting in the US. Transportation Research Part D 10: 347–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rind, Esther, Niamh Shortt, Richard Mitchell, Elizabeth Richardson, and Jamie Pearce. 2015. Are income-related differences in active travel associated with physical environmental characteristics? A multi-level ecological approach. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12: 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Stathi, Afroditi, Holly Gilbert, Kenneth Fox, Jo Coulson, Mark Davis, and Janice Thompson. 2012. Determinants of neighborhood activity of adults age 70 and over: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 20: 148–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Stevenson, Mark, Jason Thompson, Thiago de Sá, Reid Ewing, Dinesh Mohan, Rod McClure, Ian Roberts, Geetam Tiwari, Billie Giles-Corti, Xiaoduan Sun, and et al. 2016. Land use, transport, and population health: Estimating the health benefits of compact cities. Lancet 388: 2925–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sun, Fei, Ian J Norman, and Alison E While. 2013. Physical activity in older people: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 13: 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sun, Guibo, Nicolas Oreskovic, and Hui Lin. 2014. How do changes to the built environment influence walking behaviors? a longitudinal study within a university campus in Hong Kong. International Journal of Health Geographics 13: 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Sun, Guibo, Ransford A. Acheampong, Hui Lin, and Vivian C. Pun. 2015. Understanding Walking Behavior among University Students Using Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12: 13794–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Troped, Philip Kosuke Tamura, Meghan McDonough, Heather Starnes, Peter James, Eran Ben-Joseph, Ellen Cromley, Robin Puett, Steven Melly, and Francine Laden. 2017. Direct and Indirect Associations Between the Built Environment and Leisure and Utilitarian Walking in Older Women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 51: 282–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Van Cauwenberg, Jelle, Liesbeth De Donder, Peter Clarys, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Tine Buffel, Nico De Witte, Sarah Dury, Dominique Verté, and Benedicte Deforche. 2014. Relationships between the perceived neighborhood social environment and walking for transportation among older adults. Social Science & Medicine 104: 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Van Cauwenberg, Jelle, Veerle Van Holle, Dorien Simons, Riet Deridder, Peter Clarys, Liesbet Goubert, Jack Nasar, Jo Salmon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, and Benedicte Deforche. 2012. Environmental factors influencing older adults’ walking for transportation: A study using walk-along interviews. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 9: 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Xiao, Longzhu, Linchuan Yang, Jixiang Liu, and Hongtai Yang. 2020. Built Environment Correlates of the Propensity of Walking and Cycling. Sustainability 12: 8752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yun, Hae Young. 2019. Environmental Factors Associated with Older Adult’s Walking Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Sustainability 11: 3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zandieh, Razieh, Johannes Flacke, Javier Martinez, Phil Jones, and Martin Van Maarseveen. 2017. Do Inequalities in Neighborhood Walkability Drive Disparities in Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14: 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The Research Framework.
Figure 1. The Research Framework.
Socsci 10 00479 g001
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic variables and familiarity (N = 1636).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic variables and familiarity (N = 1636).
VariablesDescription of VariableFrequencyPercentageMean
Age (years old) 41.02
GenderMale71443.6
Female92256.3
Monthly income (Chilean Peso)(Low) Less than 300 mil 48357.5
(Medium) 300–1200 mil31837.9
(Upper-Medium and Higher) 1200–1700 and More 394.6
Home PropertyOwner 123475.4
Rent38623.6
EducationLow (Primary school and Lower)66340.5
Intermediate (High School and similar degrees)83751.2
High (University degrees, bachelor and higher) 1368.3
Job SituaciónWith job (Full or part time)56234.3
Occasionally working231.4
Retired and no job (The family members who do not work)104263.7
Access to InternetNo Internet75646.2
Having Internet87553.5
Access to TVNo TV68441.8
Having TV94958
Current Housing TypeDepartment1609.7
Villa Houses147390
Driver’s licenseHave 26516.2
Do not have136783.5
Time Living Years (Familiarity)Up to one year1016.2
1–538323.4
6–10 22413.7
11–2034521.1
More tan 20 years58035.4
Number of Vehicles at HomeHave54133.1
Do not Have109566.9
Number of Bicycles at Home 1.07
Number of People in Household 4.12
Number of Trips for each household 11.95
Walking trips based on purpose of walking
 To study 50929.6
 To Job 31718.4
 For shopping 29317
 See someone 19012.7
 To health center 896.4
 For recreation 784.9
 Otra cosa 16011
Table 2. The results of adjusted multiple regression analysis in regard to walking behavior (N = 1636).
Table 2. The results of adjusted multiple regression analysis in regard to walking behavior (N = 1636).
VariablesStandard Coefficienttp-Value
Socio-demographic variables and Familiarity
 Gender Dummy 0.1034.1020.000 **
 Age (Continous) 0.1354.0150.000 **
Monthly income (“Upper medium and higher income” is reference category)
 Dummy low income0.0240.6750.500
 Dummy medium income−0.030−0.8540.394
 Home property Dummy−0.011−0.3820.702
 Education (High education is reference category)
 Dummy low education−0.084−1.5230.128
 Dummy intermediate education−0.056−1.1060.269
 Job Situación (“Retired and no job” is reference category)
 Dummy with job0.0922.8110.005 **
 Dummy occasionally working0.0391.5640.118
 Access to internet (Dummy)−0.016−0.5850.559
 Access to TV (Dummy)−0.042−1.5810.104
 Dummy Housing Type −0.046−1.7810.075 *
 Driver’s license (Dummy)−0.057−1.9650.050 *
Time Living Years (Familiarity) (More than 20 years is reference category)
 Less than one year Dummy0.0150.5040.614
 1–5 years Dummy0.0140.4670.641
 6–10 years Dummy0.0150.5310.596
 11–20 years Dummy0.0461.6380.102
 Having private car at home (Dummy)−0.043−1.6090.098 *
 Number of Bicycles at Home (Continous)0.004−0.1590.874
 Number of People in Household (Continous)0.1223.6230.000 **
 Number of Trips in household (Continous)0.0030.0940.925
Social variables
 Proportion of walking trips to total trips in each household0.1766.3130.000 **
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Dependent variable: Walking Behavior; R Square: 0.087.
Table 3. The results of adjusted multiple regression analysis in regard to walking behavior based on the purpose of the walking trips.
Table 3. The results of adjusted multiple regression analysis in regard to walking behavior based on the purpose of the walking trips.
Standard Coefficient 1p-ValueStandard Coefficient 2p-ValueStandard Coefficient 3p-Value
Socio-demographic variables
 Gender (Dummy)0.0570.3720.0930.035 **0.1410.023 **
 Age (Continous)0.1190.1160.1430.057 *0.1440.027 **
Monthly income (“Upper medium and higher income” is reference category)
 Dummy low income−0.0730.3260.0920.0540.0670.528
 Dummy medium income−0.1860.1130.2140.7540.1090.335
 Home property Dummy−0.0200.771−0.0210.6710.1040.126
Education (High education is reference category)
 Dummy low education−0.1510.169−0.1990.472−0.0080.931
 Dummu intermediate education−0.1590.129−0.0380.887−0.0180.824
Job Situación (“Retired and no job” is reference category)
 Dummy with job0.1730.011 **0.0320.478−0.0660.326
 Dummy occasionally working−0.0440.4630.0360.4340.0330.599
 Access to internet (Dummy)−0.1130.122−0.0580.2630.0460.490
 Access to TV (Dummy)−0.0510.446−0.0110.819−0.1100.071 *
 Dummy Housing Type 0.0370.567−0.1140.017 **−0.1590.012 **
 Driver’s license (Dummy)−0.0020.976−0.1770.000 **−0.1370.052 *
Time Living Years (Familiarity) (More than 20 years is reference category)
 Less than one year Dummy−0.1240.1030.1260.0250.1120.134
 1–5 years Dummy0.0290.653−0.0210.7220.0830.236
 6–10 years Dummy−0.0830.2110.0250.6370.0620.344
 11–20 years Dummy−0.0680.2780.0730.1840.1240.050 **
 Having private car at home (Dummy)0.0100.883−0.0770.1100.0080.899
 Number of Bicycles at Home (Continous)−0.0370.5730.0430.357−0.0640.312
 Number of People in Household (Continous)0.1120.1790.0780.1460.1410.124
 Number of Trips in household (Continous)0.1670.054 *−0.0030.9590.0280.746
Social Variables
 Proportion of walking trips to total trips in each household0.2950.000 **0.0650.1930.1720.009
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; 1: Model 1: Walking for shopping; R Square: 0.154; N = 293; 2: Model 2: Walking to reach educational destinations; R Square: 0.125; N = 509; 3: Model 3: Walking to/from work; R Square: 0.143; N = 317.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paydar, M.; Fard, A.K. The Contribution of Socio-Demographic Factors to Walking Behavior Considering Destination Types; Case Study: Temuco, Chile. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10, 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120479

AMA Style

Paydar M, Fard AK. The Contribution of Socio-Demographic Factors to Walking Behavior Considering Destination Types; Case Study: Temuco, Chile. Social Sciences. 2021; 10(12):479. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paydar, Mohammad, and Asal Kamani Fard. 2021. "The Contribution of Socio-Demographic Factors to Walking Behavior Considering Destination Types; Case Study: Temuco, Chile" Social Sciences 10, no. 12: 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120479

APA Style

Paydar, M., & Fard, A. K. (2021). The Contribution of Socio-Demographic Factors to Walking Behavior Considering Destination Types; Case Study: Temuco, Chile. Social Sciences, 10(12), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120479

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop