Next Article in Journal
BIM Search Engine: Effects of Object Relationships and Information Standards
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Study of UHPFRC Continuous Deep Beams with Openings
Previous Article in Journal
A Case Study on the Application of 3D Scanning Technology in Deformation Monitoring of Slope Stabilization Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Preparation of Ground Blast Furnace Slag-Steel Slag Pavement Concrete Using Different Activators and Its Performance Investigation

1
Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University, No. 292, Ziyun Road, Shushan District, Hefei 230601, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, No. 122, Luoshi Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(7), 1590; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071590
Submission received: 15 May 2023 / Revised: 17 June 2023 / Accepted: 20 June 2023 / Published: 23 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Concrete Structures: Structural Behaviors and Design Methods)

Abstract

:
Steel slag and ground blast furnace slag show good wear resistance, which is suitable for improving the abrasion performance of pavement concrete. This work presents an investigation of the activation of Na2SO4, Na2CO3 and Na2SiO3 on the GBFS-SS composite pavement concrete. The results showed that both Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 can promote the strength development of the GBFS-SS composite cementitious system. Na2CO3 shows limited improvement in the strength of GBFS-SS composite paste. The GBFS-SS composite paste activated with Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 combination shows hydration products of ettringite, portlandite and amorphous C-A-S-H gel. SO42− can accelerate the depolymerization of the aluminosilicate network in GBFS and SS vitreous structure, while SiO32− can only facilitate the pozzolanic reaction of GBFS and SS, but also participate in the hydration to form more C-A-S-H gel. Na2SO4 as the activator can reduce the dry shrinkage of the pavement concrete, while Na2SiO3 as the activator can further improve the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of the pavement concrete. The combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 shows a better effect on improving the performance of pavement concrete than the single Na2SiO3 or Na2SO4 activator. At the optimal content of 3% of Na2SiO3 and 1% of Na2SO4, the pavement concrete obtains the 60 d compressive strength of 73.5 MPa, the 60 d drying shrinkage of 270 × 10−6, the 60 d interconnected porosity of 6.85%, and the 28 d abrasion resistance of 28.32 h/(kg/m2).

1. Introduction

As the main raw materials used in the construction industry, the production process of cement clinker requires a “two grinding and one burning” process, and the cost of resources and energy is huge (for every 1 t of cement clinker, 1.2 t of limestone, 0.18 t of clay and 0.15 t of standard coal are consumed, and 0.85 t of carbon dioxide gas will be emitted into the air [1]). It goes against the low-carbon green building concept advocated by the world. To this end, scholars have studied the use of industrial solid waste to replace part of the cement used to prepare concrete, such as fly ash [2,3] and slag [4,5], etc., and some scholars have also started to explore the use of cement clinker free alkali-activated materials as concrete materials [6,7,8,9]. After long-term exploration and practice, fly ash, slag and so on have been realized as high-quality resource utilization in the construction industry. They have been transformed from bulk industrial wastes into supplementary cementing materials. Compared with the wide application of fly ash and slag, steel slag and other bulk industrial solid wastes are very limited in the building materials industry [10].
Steel slag is a by-product of the metallurgy industry, whose emissions account for about 15–20% of the iron and steel output [11,12,13]. At present, the comprehensive utilization rate of steel slag in China is low, which is only about 20% [14], and the output of steel slag has been increasing rapidly with the development of the iron and steel industry. Up to now, the waste steel slag accumulated in China has exceeded 400 million tons, with a 100 million tons increment per year [15]. The discharge and accumulation of steel slag not only occupy a large amount of land, but also pollute the ecological environment due to the alkaline leachates. Building materials are the most effective way to absorb industrial solid waste on a large scale at the present stage [16,17,18]. The basic reactive minerals in steel slag are tricalcium silicate (C3S), dicalcium silicate (C2S) and dicalcium ferrite (C2F) [19], and these mineral components make steel slag have certain cementitious capabilities [20], but the C3S and C2S in steel slag are presented in coarse crystals, with dense structure and low reactivity [21]. Steel slag can hydrate in water at ambient temperature curing conditions, but its hydration rate is very slow and the induction period is very long [22]. Although the hydration products of steel slag are the same as the main hydration products of Portland cement, which are C-S-H gel and Ca(OH)2 [23], the cohesive force of the hardened steel slag paste is very low. The aluminate minerals in steel slag hydrate later than silicate minerals, and the inert components like the RO phase do not participate in the hydration reaction and only play as the fillers embedded in hydration products in the early hydration stage [24,25].
Steel slag and ground blast furnace slag (GBFS) have similar composition and vitreous structure, high content of Fe and Mn and high wear resistance, which can be applied to the pavement concrete preparation to improve its abrasion performance [26,27,28]. Cao et al. [29] studied the mechanical properties and microstructure of slaked lime carbonated steel slag mixture and found that slaked lime can enhance the hydration of steel slag powder. The investigation from Zhao et al. [22] revealed that the hydration product of steel slag is C-S-H gels and Ca(OH)2. Their study also proves that a 5% gypsum addition can improve the hydration degree of steel slag. Furthermore, its hydration can also be activated by elevated temperature [30]. Phoo-Ngernkham et al. [31] studied the effect of sodium hydroxide and water glass on the fly ash-GBFS geopolymer. They found that the compressive strength and microstructure of the geopolymer paste improved with the increased content of GBFS. Nguyen et al. [32] found that the 1 d and 28 d compressive strength of 50%slag-50%cement blend activated with 1% Na2SO4 was 5 MPa and 46 MPa, respectively. The slag cement blend activated with 5% and 10% Na2SO4 has 28 d compressive strength of 36~56 MPa, respectively. In addition, the volume shrinkage of the Portland slag cement sample decreased with the increase of Na2SO4 content. If reasonable measures can take to activate the reactivity of steel slag, the Ca(OH)2 generated by its hydration can be used to promote the pozzolanic reaction of GBFS in the cementitious system. The combined activation of these solid wastes and their high-volume application in pavement concrete can be realized. This can significantly reduce the cost of pavement concrete and improve its abrasion performance. However, the effect of activator type on the performance of steel slag–GBFS composite was not fully understood.
Therefore, this work intends to use GBFS and steel slag as cementitious materials to produce pavement concrete. Different activators were selected to promote the pozzolanic reaction of steel slag and GBFS. The influence of the activator on the mechanical properties of the blended pastes was studied to optimize the incorporation content of the activators and its activation mechanisms were revealed [33]. Subsequently, the mechanical properties, abrasion performance, volume stability and durability of the GBFS-SS composite concrete were studied.

2. Raw Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The main cementitious materials used in this paper are Portland cement, granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and converter steel slag (SS). Cement is made from Hubei Yadong Cement Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) of strength grade of P·II52.5, density of 3.06 g/cm3 and specific surface area of 360 m2/kg. Steel slag is produced in Taizhen Mineral Products Processing Plant (Shijiazhuang, China), density of 3.27 g/cm3 and specific surface area of 480 m2/kg. The XRD patterns of SS, cement and GBFS are shown in Figure 1. The main phases in steel slag are C2S, C3S, C2F and RO phase (RO phase is a solid solution of FeO, MgO and MnO). GBFS is produced in Lingshou County, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, which is graded as S95 according to Chinese GB/T 18046-2017 Standard [34]. The density and specific surface area of GBFS are 2.92 g/cm3 and 450 m2/kg, respectively. The chemical compositions for cement, GBFS and steel slag powder from X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) tests are shown in Table 1.
The particle size distribution of the cementitious materials was determined by Mastersizer2000 laser particle size analyzer (Malvern Panalytical, UK), and the results are shown in Figure 2. As can be seen from the figure, the most probable particle sizes are 17 μm for GBFS, 21 μm for cement and 53 μm for SS. This means GBFS and cement have similar particle size distribution, SS shows the coarse particle size distribution, which is mainly concentrated in 18 μm~200 μm.
The coarse aggregate used in this work is 5–10 mm and 10–20 mm basalt crushed stones, provided by Yichang Yuyuan Construction Co., Ltd. (Yichang, China), with a density of 3.08 g/cm3, crushing value of 8.3%, Los Angeles wear value of 12.5% (Los Angeles wear value defined by the ASTM C131 Standard [35]), water absorption of 0.52% and needle flake content of 6.2%. The grain grading of coarse aggregates is shown in Table 2 and Table 3. In pavement concrete preparation, the weight ratio of 5–10 mm and 10–20 mm basalt crushed stones is 4:6.
High titanium heavy slag (HTHS) sand is used as fine aggregate. It has a packing density of 3100 kg/m3, an apparent density of 1925 kg/m3 and a fineness modulus of 3.24. The grain grading of fine aggregate is shown in Table 4. The water content of HTHS is 8.4%. Due to the highly interconnected pores in high titanium heavy slag sand, it can play as an internal curing material in concrete.
Polycarboxylic acid superplasticizer produced by Jiangsu Subote New Materials Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China), was used in this experiment, which has a water reduction rate greater than 20%. Na2SO4, Na2CO3 and Na2SiO3 activators are analytical grade reagents produced by Tianjin Beichen Founder Reagent Factory. The retarder is commercial borax (Na2B4O7·10H2O).

2.2. Mixing Proportion

The optimal mixing proportion of blended paste was determined to be steel slag:GBFS:cement = 36:54:10, through previous experiments. The effect of single and combination activation of three types of activators (Na2SO4, Na2CO3 and Na2SiO3) on the performance of the paste was studied. In the control group, the water to binder (w/b) ratio was 0.25 and the content of Superplasticizer was 2%. In the activator-containing groups, the w/b ratio was set at 0.28 and the content of the water-reducing agent was 3.2%. At the same time, 0.2% borax was added as a retarder when the activator was added [36]. The detailed mixing proportion was given in Table 5, where the control group was named C. The activated group was named as the activator type and its percentage, such as the S1 group indicating 1% of Na2SO4 addition. Note that the content of activators was calculated according to their Na2O content by the weight of total cementitious materials.

2.3. Testing Methods

2.3.1. Dry Shrinkage and Interconnected Porosity

Dry shrinkage test was carried out according to Chinese JTGE30-2005 Standard [37], the concrete specimen was removed from the standard curing room at 3 d age and put into a constant temperature and humidity room (temperature of 20 ± 2 °C, relative humidity of 60% ± 5%) to measure the initial length (including probe). After the initial measurement, the length of the specimen was measured at 1, 3, 7, 14, 28 and 60 d to calculate its dry shrinkage. The interconnected porosity of the concrete specimen is calculated by the mass increment of water-saturated specimen against its drying mass:

2.3.2. Abrasion Performance

According to Chinese JTGE30-2005 Standard [37], the abrasion performance of concrete specimens was tested by the underwater steel ball method. After 72 h of grinding by steel ball under water, the 28 d abrasion loss and abrasion resistance of concrete specimens were calculated as follows:
G c = m 1 m 2 0.0125
G e = T · A m 1 m 2
where Gc is 28 d abrasion loss (kg/m2), Ge is abrasion resistance (h/(kg/m2)), m1 is initial specimen mass (kg), m2 is specimen mass after grinding (kg), T is total grinding time and A is the abrasion area of the specimen.

2.3.3. Freeze–Thaw Test

The frost resistance of concrete was tested according to Chinese GB/T50082-2009 Standard [38]. The concrete samples were immersed in 20 ± 2 °C water for 4 d at the age of 24 d, and then the freeze–thaw circulation was taken. The freezing temperature ranges from −20 °C to −18 °C. The freezing duration is 4 h and the thawing duration is 4 h.

2.3.4. Microstructure Tests

The paste samples were prepared for microstructure tests. After reaching a specific age, the hydration of the paste was terminated with anhydrous ethanol for 24 h, and then the samples were dried in the oven at 60 °C for 24 h. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted using an Empyrean X-ray diffractometer, manufactured by Panaco in the Netherlands. The scanning range was 5°~50° and the step size was 4°/min. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) test was performed by JSM-7500F field emission scanning electron microscope, which was produced by Japan Electronics Company. Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) was tested using Nicolet6700 made by ThermoFisher Scientific, (Waltham, MA, USA). The test was conducted in the middle infrared region with a spectral range of 4000~400 cm−1 and a resolution of 2 cm−1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Activators on the Strength of Blended Paste

3.1.1. Effect of Na2SO4 Content on the Strength

Figure 3 shows the effect of Na2SO4 on the compressive strength of the blended paste. As can be seen from the figure, with the content of Na2SO4 increasing from 1% to 5%, the compressive strength of the paste at each age first increased and then decreased. The activating effect is not obvious when the content of Na2SO4 is low. Since the w/b ratio of paste in the group with Na2SO4 was higher than that in the control group, the activating effect of a small amount of Na2SO4 was not obvious, and hence the strength of the paste was lower than that of the control group. With increasing Na2SO4 content, the reaction of GBFS and SS is activated and the strength of the hardened paste increases. When the content of Na2SO4 was 3%, the 28 d compressive strength reached 47.8 MPa, which was 9.4% higher than the control group. This indicates that SO42− can effectively activate the surface of SS, and promote the dissolution of vitreous structure in SS [39]. The hydration of steel slag produces calcium hydroxide, which can activate the pozzolanic reaction of GBFS. Under the combining activation effects of SS and SO42−, slag can participate in hydration and react with CH to form ettringite and C-A-S-H gel. Ettringite and C-A-S-H gel intertwines with each other, rendering the paste structure more compact and ensuring the steady growth of its mechanical strength. When the content of Na2SO4 exceeds 3%, the activation effect of Na2SO4 is too strong, which can accelerate the setting speed of the paste. This makes the paste hard to compact during cast, resulting in a decrease in the strength of the paste. Therefore, the optimal dosage of Na2SO4 was determined to be 3%. It should be noted that when the dosage of Na2SO4 was 3%, although the 7 d and 28 d compressive strength of the paste was higher than that of the control group, the 3 d compressive strength of the paste was still lower than the control group. This indicates that Na2SO4 as an activator shows limited promotion on the early strength development of the paste.

3.1.2. Effect of Na2CO3 Content on the Strength

Figure 4 shows the effect of Na2CO3 activation on the compressive strength of composite cementitious paste. It can be seen that with the content of Na2CO3 increasing from 1% to 5%, the compressive strength of the paste first increase and then decrease for all ages. When the content of Na2CO3 was 4%, the 28 d compressive strength reached 44.6 MPa, which was 2.1% higher than the control group. This is because the incorporation of Na2CO3 can provide CO32− ions, which can combine with calcium ions in pore solution to form a large number of calcite and aragonite minerals [40]. This can promote the refinement of the pore structure and densification of the paste. When the content of Na2CO3 is too high, however, CaCO3 crystals can generate fast and agglomerate, resulting in the rapid setting of cementitious paste. This is easy to form harmful large pores in the hardened paste and is negative to its strength development. Therefore, the still increase of Na2CO3 content leads to decreasing strength of the composite paste. It should be noted that at the optimal addition of Na2CO3, the performance improvement of the activated paste is also negligible compared with the control group. Therefore, Na2CO3 shows little engineering application value in activating the GBFS-SS blended paste.

3.1.3. Effect of Na2SiO3 Content on the Strength

Figure 5 shows the effect of Na2SiO3 addition on the mechanical strength of the blended paste. As shown in the figure, the compressive strength of the paste first increases and then decreases, as the content of Na2SiO3 increases from 1% to 5%, regardless of age. At the content of 3%, the 28 d compressive strength of the paste reaches the highest value of 50.6 MPa, which is 15.8% higher than the control group. Compared with Na2SO4 and Na2CO3 activators, Na2SiO3 further improves the strength of hardened paste. This implies that Na2SiO3 is more suitable for activating the reaction of GBFS-SS composite materials. This is because the SiO32− ions released from Na2SiO3 not only can improve the alkalinity of the pore solution to depolymerize aluminosilicate skeleton in GBFS and SS, but also can participate in the generation of C-A-S-H gel [41]. The hydration of SS can produce calcium hydroxide, which can promote the pozzolanic reaction of GBFS and react with SiO32− and Al3+ ions to form more C-A-S-H gel. Therefore, the synergistic effect of the Na2SiO3 activation and SS reaction can improve the compactness of the hardened paste. When the content of Na2SiO3 exceeds 3%, the alkalinity of the paste is too high and the hardening speed is too fast, which is not conducive to the densification of the paste. Therefore, further addition of Na2SiO3 would result in decreasing strength of the blended paste.

3.1.4. Effect of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 Combination on the Strength

The above experiments show that both Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 have a good activating effect on the GBFS-SS composite paste. Hence, this section studies the combination of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 on the compressive strength of the composite paste. At the basis of 3% Na2SiO3 addition, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0% and 2.5% of Na2SO4 were further added into the paste, respectively, in order to study the effect of combined activation. Detailed mixing proportion is given in Table 6.
Figure 6 shows the effect of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 combined activation on the compressive strength of the composite blended paste. It can be seen from the figure that, as the content of Na2SO4 increases from 0% to 2.5%, the compressive strength of the paste at all ages increases first and then decreases. When the content of Na2SO4 is 1%, the compressive strength reaches the highest value, meaning the optimal incorporating content is 3% for Na2SiO3 and 1% for Na2SO4. The 7 d and 28 d compressive strength of the Si3S1 group paste increased by 1.6% and 1.5% compared to the control group, respectively. This indicates that the combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 can further promote the hydration of GBFS-SS paste and, hence, improve its compressive strength [42,43]. It can be seen that the 3 d compressive strength of the Si3S1 group paste is evidently reduced compared with the control group, indicating that the addition of Na2SO4 would retard the early strength development of the paste [44]. This is the same as the law when in a single Na2SO4-activated sample.

3.2. Effect of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 Combination on the Microstructure of GBFS-SS Composite Paste

3.2.1. X-ray Diffraction

Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns of the 3 d and 28 d aged composite pastes activated with both Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3. As shown in the figure, under the combined activation of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3, the main hydration products of the composite pastes are ettringite (AFt), portlandite (CH) and amorphous C-A-S-H gel. Additionally, a small amount of zoisite was also produced. However, the inert mineral components in SS, such as the RO phase and C2F, are reacted very slowly. The relative intensities of their diffraction peaks remain unchanged [45]. With the extension of hydration age, the relative strength of diffraction peaks of C2S and C3S gradually decreases, while that of portlandite gradually increases, indicating that portlandite and C-S-H gel are produced during the hydration. As compared with the control group, the relative strength of ettringite diffraction peaks increased significantly after the addition of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3, because the addition of both provides a large amount of SO42− and SiO32− in the system. Under the synergic activation of SiO32− and SO42−, the surface of slag particles dissolved and depolymerization occurred. Active silicate tetrahedra [SiO4] and aluminate tetrahedra [AlO4] were formed, which further promoted the production of C-A-S-H gel and ettringite. Moreover, the relative strength of ettringite diffraction peaks increases with the extension of hydration age, indicating that ettringite is continuously generated in the paste. Meanwhile, a large number of silicates hydrolyzed to produce H3SiO4− and OH, which could maintain the alkalinity of the paste and promote the continuous polymerization of silicate tetrahedra.

3.2.2. Fourier Transform Infrared

Figure 8 shows the FTIR spectra of the combined activated GBFS-SS composite pastes at a hydration age of 3 d and 28 d. Among them, the sharp peak around 3644 cm−1 is the stretching vibration peak of the free OH bond, indicating that a small amount of portlandite is generated after 3 d of hydration. This is because under the activation of SO42−, the SS hydrated produces portlandite. As the amount of Na2SO4 increases, more hydration products had been generated in the system, and these hydration products would react with portlandite to form C-A-S-H gel. Around 3443 cm−1 and 1642 cm−1 are the stretching and bending vibration peaks of the H-O-H bond of the bonded water in hydration products, respectively, indicating that a large number of amorphous C-A-S-H gel are generated in the paste. With an increased amount of Na2SO4 or the extension of hydration, the corresponding transmitted waves gradually shift towards the high wave number. This indicates that the degree of polymerization of hydration products increases gradually. However, 1425 cm−1 and 875 cm−1 are caused by the asymmetric stretching vibration and buckling vibration of CO32−, respectively, which may be due to the carbonation of f-CaO in SS or portlandite [46]. The band near 1108 cm−1 and 618 cm−1 is the vibration band of SO42− in ettringite. With the higher content of Na2SO4, the SO42− vibration band becomes more pronounced, indicating an increasing amount of ettringite generation.

3.2.3. Scanning Electronic Microscopy

Figure 9 shows the 3 d, 7 d and 28 d micrographs of hydrated GBFS-SS composite paste with 3% Na2SiO3 and 1% Na2SO4 activation. As can be seen from the figure, when the hydration age reaches 3 d, a large number of C-A-S-H gel-like fiber networks and a small amount of hexagonal-shaped portlandite sheet have been generated in the system. At this age, the sample structure is loose, with a higher proportion of pores, and the hydration products are isolated. With the progression of hydration, the amount of hydration products increases and their crystallinity is gradually enhanced. The fibrous C-A-S-H gel gradually developed into clusters and intertwined with ettringite and portlandite to form a three-dimensional network structure, refining the pore structure and improving the compactness of the paste.

3.3. The Performance of GBFS-SS Composite Pavement Concrete

Based on the investigation of the strength and microstructure of GBFS-SS composite pastes, this section studies the influence of different activators on the performance of composite materials concrete. The w/b ratio of the concrete sample with activators is set to 0.3 and the sand ratio is set at 0.43. The water–binder ratio and sand rate of the concrete in the control group was set as 0.29 and 0.42. The mixing proportion of concrete was shown in Table 7, where the addition of superplasticizer was modified to make the concrete have proper workability.

3.3.1. Workability and Compressive Strength

Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the workability and mechanical strength of concrete samples. It can be observed that the slump is higher than 200 mm and the slump flow is between 500–600 mm for each concrete group, showing their good workability. The 3 d, 28 d and 60 d compressive strengths of GBFS-SS pavement concrete activated with Na2SO4 are 34.3 MPa, 59.2 MPa and 69.4 MPa, respectively. The early compressive strengths are lower than those of the control group, but the 28 d and 60 d compressive strengths are increased by 2.4% and 4.8%, respectively. Under the activation of Na2SiO3, the compressive strength of GBFS-SS pavement concrete at 3 d, 28 d and 60 d increased by 6.1%, 4.5% and 7.7% compared to the control group, respectively. The 3 d, 28 d and 60 d compressive strengths of concrete with combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 are 46.3 MPa, 61.7 MPa and 73.5 MPa, respectively, showing the highest mechanical strength. The results show that the combined activation has benefit to the strength development of concrete than the activation of Na2SiO3 or Na2SO4 alone.

3.3.2. Dry Shrinkage

Figure 12 shows the drying shrinkage of composite pavement concrete mixed with different activators. It can be seen from the figure that the shrinkage of the control group was 25 × 10−6 at 1 d. The shrinkage of concrete activated with different activators was reduced compared with the control group. Under the activation of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3, the early drying shrinkage decreased by 90% and 80%, respectively. This indicates Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 can both reduce the dry shrinkage of the composite concrete. The reason for Na2SO4 addition reducing early shrinkage reduction of concrete is due to the compensated shrinkage effect of ettringite formation, while Na2SiO3 addition can reduce shrinkage of composite concrete due to the rapid development of its early strength and the enhancing resistance to deformation. The combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 reduced the early drying shrinkage by 86%, which shows a moderate effect in reducing the dry shrinkage. At the age of 60 d, the shrinkage of the control group concrete was 240 × 10−6, while that for the Na2SO4 activated group was 220 × 10−6. The shrinkage of the Na2SiO3-activated group was 285 × 10−6, which is 18.75% higher than the control group. This shows that Na2SO4 activation can continuously reduce the dry shrinkage of the concrete, whereas Na2SiO3 would enlarge the shrinkage of the concrete sample at an elderly age. The reason for the evident shrinkage in Na2SiO3 activated group at the later stage may be caused by its alkali activation [47]. The volume of mesopore (<50 nm) in the alkaline activated materials was about one time higher than the ordinary Portland cement paste, resulting in their significant capillary pore shrinkage. With respect to Na2SO4 activation, it can compensate for the shrinkage of concrete through ettringite formation during all of the hydration ages. At 60 d, the shrinkage of the Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 combined activation group is 270 × 10−6, with an increase of 12.5% compared to the control group. This indicates that under Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 combination, the formation of ettringite promoted by Na2SO4 can still play a role in shrinkage compensation, and the problem of later-stage shrinkage caused by Na2SiO3 activator can be effectively moderated.
The shrinkage of each concrete group hydrated for 60 d is still lower than 300 με, which meets the requirement of pavement concrete. This could be attributed to the internal curing effect of high titanium heavy slag sand [48]. In the concrete sample with Na2SO4 addition, the internal curing water can promote the formation and expansion of ettringite, which can further reduce the volume shrinkage.

3.3.3. Interconnected Porosity

Figure 13 shows the interconnected porosity of concrete with different activators addition. It can be seen that, for all groups of samples, the decrease of interconnected porosity of concrete from 3 d to 28 d is significantly greater than that from 28 d to 60 d, the decrease of the former is 26.76%, while the decrease of the latter is only 7.69%. This is because the hydration of the concrete is faster in the early stage. The pores are quickly filled with hydration products. The hydration degree of the late-age system is high. Most of the connected pores in the hardened paste have been filled, and the pore structure has been optimized and improved. It is difficult to further substantially refine the pores, so the porosity reduction is minor. Compared with the control group, when salt or alkali activators are added, the interconnected porosity of concrete at each age is significantly reduced. This is because the hydration degree of the composite cementitious system will be further improved with the extension of the age, and the generated hydration products continue to fill the connected pores in the concrete, so the interconnected porosity gradually decreases. The variation of the interconnected porosity of concrete with different activators is negatively correlated with its compressive strength; that is, the higher the compressive strength of concrete, the lower the interconnected porosity. This is because the addition of an activator promotes hydration of the cementitious materials, which forms more amount of hydration products, and improves the compressive strength of concrete when the hydration products fill the capillary pores. Therefore, increasing mechanical strength is also accompanied by the reduction of interconnected porosity.

3.3.4. Abrasion Performance

Figure 14 shows the abrasion loss and abrasion resistance of concrete activated with different activators. As shown in the figure, the abrasion resistance of composite pavement concrete activated by Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 has been improved by 15.2% and 22.4% compared to the control group concrete, respectively. Accordingly, the abrasion loss of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3-activated concrete samples is 13.1% and 18.3% lower than the reference group, respectively. The combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 shows the most obvious effect on the abrasion performance of concrete. The abrasion resistance of concrete is 28.32 h/(kg/m2), which is 32.9% higher than that of the control group. The abrasion loss is 2.542 kg/m2, which is 24.7% lower than the control group. There is a good correlation between the abrasion resistance test results and the compressive strength test results of concrete. This implies that the combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 effectively promotes the hydration of paste, and more hydration products are formed to make concrete denser, so its wear resistance is greatly increased.

3.3.5. Freeze–Thaw Resistance

Table 8 shows the mass loss and compressive strength loss of concrete with different activators under different freeze–thaw cycles. As can be seen from the table, the freeze–thaw resistance of concrete is greatly improved as the Na2SO4 is added. Its mass loss ratio and strength loss ratio of the concrete sample after 100 times of freeze–thaw cycles is 0.80% and 9.51%, respectively. As compared with the control group, the mass loss and strength loss decreased by 20.8% and 19.9%, respectively. The mass loss and strength loss of the concrete activated by Na2SiO3 were 0.84% and 9.38% after 100 freeze–thaw cycles, respectively, which decreased by 16.8% and 21.0%, compared with the control group. The combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 shows the best freezing–thawing resistance. The mass loss and strength loss for the combined activated sample are 0.73% and 8.74%, respectively. As compared with the other sample, the combined activated sample has the lowest mass loss and strength loss after freeze–thaw cycling. The freeze–thaw resistance of concrete samples is consistent with their compressive strength. This is because the failure of GBFS-SS composite pavement concrete under freeze–thaw cycle is originated from the expansive crystallization stress of water in the pore solution. In the freezing stage, micro-cracks occur due to the crystallization stress of the pore solution, and in the melting stage, more water is absorbed through micro-cracks. Subsequently, more ice crystals are produced in the next freezing stage, resulting in further increasing crystallization stress. Therefore, reducing the initial porosity of concrete can improve its freeze–thaw resistance. The combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 can promote the hydration of composite paste. This causes more hydration product formation and filling of the capillary pores. Therefore, the freeze–thaw resistance of the pavement concrete is improved as its compressive strength increases.

4. Conclusions

This work prepared GBFS-SS composite concrete with different activators. The effect of activators on the compressive strength of GBFS-SS composite paste was studied to obtain their optimal content. Then, the mechanical properties, dry shrinkage, interconnected porosity, abrasion resistance and freeze–thaw resistance of GBFS-SS composite concrete were studied. Microscopic testing techniques of XRD, FTIR and SEM were implemented to elucidate the activation mechanisms. Conclusions can be made as follows:
(1)
Both Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 can promote the strength development of the GBFS-SS composite. The composite paste with 3% of Na2SO4 addition has a 28 d compressive strength of 47.8 MPa, which is 9.4% higher than the control group. The composite paste with 3% of Na2SiO3 addition has a compressive strength of 50.6 MPa, which is 15.8% higher than the control group. Na2CO3 shows a limited effect on the strength development of GBFS-SS composite paste. At the optimal Na2CO3 content of 4%, the 28 d compressive strength of the composite paste is only 44.6 MPa, which is 2.1% higher than the control group.
(2)
As compared with Na2SiO3 or Na2SO4 single activation, the combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 shows a better improving effect on the strength development of the composite paste. The GBFS-SS composite concrete with 3% of Na2SiO3 and 1% of Na2SO4 addition has a 60 d compressive strength of 73.5 MPa, a 60 d drying shrinkage of 270 × 10−6, a 60 d interconnected porosity of 6.85%, and the 28 d abrasion resistance of 28.32 h/kg/m2.
(3)
All the GBFS-SS composite paste contains the hydration products of ettringite, portlandite and amorphous C-A-S-H gel. The Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 activated paste has an extra hydration product of zoisite. SO42− can accelerate the depolymerization of the aluminosilicate network in GBFS and SS. SiO32− not only facilitates the pozzolanic reaction of GBFS and SS, but also participates in the hydration to form more C-A-S-H gel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y. and Q.D.; methodology, G.Z.; software, L.L.; validation, G.Z.; funding acquisition, J.Y.; investigation, X.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Outstanding Youth in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province (2022AH030036), Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials (JZCL2202ZR) and the Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures (Wuhan University of Technology) (SYSJJ2022-22).

Data Availability Statement

The data is available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feiz, R.; Ammenberg, J.; Baas, L.; Eklund, M.; Helgstrand, A.; Marshall, R. Improving the CO2, performance of cement, part i: Utilizing life-cycle assessment and key performance indicators to assess development within the cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 98, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nassar, R.; Soroushian, P.; Ghebrab, T. Field investigation of high-volume fly ash pavement concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 73, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kenzhebek, A.; Nazerke, B.; Ina, P. The Effect of Mechanical Activation of Fly Ash on Cement-Based Materials Hydration and Hardened State Properties. Materials 2023, 16, 082959. [Google Scholar]
  4. Han, Y.; Lin, R.S.; Wang, X.Y. Performance and sustainability of quaternary composite paste comprising limestone, calcined Hwangtoh clay, and granulated blast furnace slag. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 43, 102655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marathe, S.; Mithanthaya, I.R.; Shenoy, R.Y. Durability and microstructure studies on Slag-Fly Ash-Glass powder based alkali activated pavement quality concrete mixes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 287, 123047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.; Li, S. Study on processability, compressive strength, drying shrinkage and evolution mechanisms of microstructures of alkali-activated slag-glass powder cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 344, 128196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sha, F.; Liu, P.; Ding, Y. Application investigation of high-phosphorus steel slag in cementitious material and ordinary concrete. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 2074–2091s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lian, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S. Experimental study on dynamic mechanical properties of fly ash and slag based alkali-activated concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 364, 129912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mu, X.; Zhang, S.; Ni, W. Performance optimization and hydration mechanism of a clinker-free ultra-high performance concrete with solid waste based binder and steel slag aggregate. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 63, 105479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, G.X.; Zhang, J.B.; Sun, H.J. Application of Iron Ore Tailings and Phosphogypsum to Create Artificial Rockfills Used in Rock-Filled Concrete. Buildings 2022, 12, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, L. Influence of waste residue treatment in metallurgical iron and steel plant on environmental protection. China Metal Bull. 2020, 1, 191–192, In Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Q.; Yan, P.Y. Hydration properties of basic oxygen furnace steel slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Furlani, E.; Tonello, G.; Maschio, S. Recycling of steel slag and glass cullet from energy saving lamps by fast firing production of ceramics. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 1714–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Fu, H.; Yan, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, P. Research status of comprehensive utilization of steel slag. China Nonferrous Metall. 2021, 50, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, T.S.; Yu, Q.J.; Wei, J.X.; Li, J.X. Investigation on mechanical properties, durability and micro-structural development of steel slag blended cements. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 110, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, W.H.; Zhou, W.T.; Lyu, X.J. Comprehensive utilization of steel slag: A review. Powder Technol. 2023, 422, 118449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Soni, A.; Das, P.K.; Hashmi, A.W. Challenges and opportunities of utilizing municipal solid waste as alternative building materials for sustainable development goals: A review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 27, 100706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fisher, L.V.; Barron, A.R. The recycling and reuse of steelmaking slags: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Martins, A.C.P.; De Carvalho, J.M.F.; Costa, L.C.B. Steel slags in cement-based composites: An ultimate review on characterization, applications and performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 291, 123265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, S.G.; Wang, H.X.; Zhang, G.Z.; Ding, Q.J. Bonding and abrasion resistance of geopolymeric repair material made with steel slag. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, J.W.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Zhuang, S.Y.; He, W. Hydration properties and microstructure characteristics of alkali–activated steel slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 118141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, J.H.; Wang, D.M.; Yan, P.Y.; Zhang, D.W.; Wang, H. Self-cementitious property of steel slag powder blended with gypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 113, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, S.; Niu, D. Hydration and mechanical properties of cement-steel slag system incorporating different activators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 363, 129981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, G.X.; Xu, K.J.; Zhu, M.Q. Experimental Study on Alkali Stimulating-Steel Slag Cementitious Materials. Int. Conf. Civ. Eng. Build. Mater. 2011, 261–263, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.; Wang, D. Influence of steel slag-silica fume composite mineral admixture on the properties of concrete. Powder Technol. 2017, 320, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, Q. Steel slag for roadway construction: A review of material characteristics and application mechanisms. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2022, 34, 3122001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aziz, M.M.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Yaacob, H.; Ali, Z.; Chang, F.L.; Adnan, A.M. Characterisation and utilisation of steel slag for the construction of roads and highways. Mater. Res. Innov. 2014, 18, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, O.; Han, S.; Liu, Y. Experimental investigation surface abrasion resistance and surface frost resistance of concrete pavement incorporating fly ash and slag. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2020, 22, 1858–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cao, W.; Yang, Q. Properties of a carbonated steel slag-slaked lime mixture. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 2015, 27, 04014115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, D.; Yan, P. Hydration heat evolution and kinetics of blended cement containing steel slag at different temperatures. Thermochim. Acta 2015, 605, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Phoo-Ngernkham, T.; Maegawa, A.; Mishima, N.; Hatanaka, S.; Chindaprasirt, P. Effects of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions on compressive and shear bond strengths of FA-GBFS geopolymer. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 91, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nguyen, H.A.; Chang, T.P.; Thymotie, A. Enhancement of early engineering characteristics of modified slag cement paste with alkali silicate and sulfate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 230, 117013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adesina, A.; Kaze, C.R. Physico-mechanical and microstructural properties of sodium sulfate activated materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 295, 123668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. GB/T 18046-2017; cement, mortar, concrete ground granular blast furnace slag. Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2017; In Chinese.
  35. ASTM C131; Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1961.
  36. Li, P.Q.; Chen, D.Y.; Jia, Z.R.; Li, Y.L.; Li, S.J.; Yu, B. Effects of Borax, Sucrose, and Citric Acid on the Setting Time and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag. Materials 2023, 16, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. TG E30-2005; Test Regulations for Cement and Cement Concrete for Highway Engineering. Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2005; In Chinese.
  38. GB/T 50082-2009; Standard for Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete. Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2009; In Chinese.
  39. Qian, H.; Hua, S.D.; Gao, Y.A.; Qian, L.Y.; Ren, X.J. Synergistic effect of EVA copolymer and sodium desulfurization ash on the printing performance of high volume blast furnace slag mixtures. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 46, 102183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Angulo-Ramirez, D.E.; De-Gutierrez, R.M.; Puertas, F. Alkali-activated Portland blast-furnace slag cement: Mechanical properties and hydration. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 140, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xue, L.L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, H. Hydration mechanisms and durability of hybrid alkaline cements (HACs): A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 266, 121039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, W.T.; Wei, Q.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, Z.W. Effect of CO32− and Ca2+ on self-healing of cementitious materials due to “build-in” carbonation. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 56, 104781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Z.K.; Yue, J.C.; Pang, G.H.; Li, R.X.; Zhang, P.; Xu, S.T. Influence of the Activator Concentration and Solid/Liquid Ratio on the Strength and Shrinkage Characteristics of Alkali-Activated Slag Geopolymer Pastes. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 11, 6631316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, W.W.; Jiang, Z.L.; Lu, M.Y.; Long, W.J.; Xing, F.; Liu, J. Effects of Seawater, NaCl, and Na2SO4 Solution Mixing on Hydration Process of Cement Paste. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2021, 33, 0899–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yan, J.J.; Wu, S.P.; Yang, C.; Zhao, Z.G.; Xie, J. Influencing mechanisms of RO phase on the cementitious properties of steel slag powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 350, 128926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, X.F.; Zheng, K.R.; Chen, L.; Prateek, G.; Yuan, Q. An approach to improve the reactivity of basic oxygen furnace slag: Accelerated carbonation and the combined use of metakaolin. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 379, 131218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Atis, C.D.; Bilim, C.; Celik, O. Influence of activator on the strength and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ding, Q.J.; Deng, C.; Yang, J.; Zhang, G.Z.; Hou, D.S. Preparation of Heavyweight Ultra-high Performance Concrete Using Barite Sand and Titanium-rich Heavy Slag Sand. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2021, 36, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD pattern of SS, cement and GBFS.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of SS, cement and GBFS.
Buildings 13 01590 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of cementitious materials. (a) Particle size distribution; (b) cumulative particle size distribution.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of cementitious materials. (a) Particle size distribution; (b) cumulative particle size distribution.
Buildings 13 01590 g002
Figure 3. Influence of Na2SO4 content on the compressive strength.
Figure 3. Influence of Na2SO4 content on the compressive strength.
Buildings 13 01590 g003
Figure 4. Influence of Na2CO3 content on the compressive strength.
Figure 4. Influence of Na2CO3 content on the compressive strength.
Buildings 13 01590 g004
Figure 5. Influence of Na2SiO3 content on the compressive strength.
Figure 5. Influence of Na2SiO3 content on the compressive strength.
Buildings 13 01590 g005
Figure 6. Influence of Na2SO4-Na2SiO3 combination on the compressive strength.
Figure 6. Influence of Na2SO4-Na2SiO3 combination on the compressive strength.
Buildings 13 01590 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of the composite paste with Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 combined activation; (a) 3 d; (b) 28 d.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of the composite paste with Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3 combined activation; (a) 3 d; (b) 28 d.
Buildings 13 01590 g007
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of GBFS-SS composite pastes activated with Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4; (a) 3 d; (b) 28 d.
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of GBFS-SS composite pastes activated with Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4; (a) 3 d; (b) 28 d.
Buildings 13 01590 g008
Figure 9. The SEM images of GBFS-SS composite paste activated with 3% Na2SiO3 and 1% Na2SO4; (a) 3 d; (b) 7 d; (c) 28 d.
Figure 9. The SEM images of GBFS-SS composite paste activated with 3% Na2SiO3 and 1% Na2SO4; (a) 3 d; (b) 7 d; (c) 28 d.
Buildings 13 01590 g009
Figure 10. Influence of activators on the workability of concrete.
Figure 10. Influence of activators on the workability of concrete.
Buildings 13 01590 g010
Figure 11. Influence of activators on the mechanical strength of concrete.
Figure 11. Influence of activators on the mechanical strength of concrete.
Buildings 13 01590 g011
Figure 12. Influence of activators on the dry shrinkage of pavement concrete.
Figure 12. Influence of activators on the dry shrinkage of pavement concrete.
Buildings 13 01590 g012
Figure 13. Influence of activators on the interconnected porosity of pavement concrete.
Figure 13. Influence of activators on the interconnected porosity of pavement concrete.
Buildings 13 01590 g013
Figure 14. Influence of activators on the abrasion performance of pavement concrete.
Figure 14. Influence of activators on the abrasion performance of pavement concrete.
Buildings 13 01590 g014
Table 1. Chemical compositions of cement, GBFS and SS (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of cement, GBFS and SS (wt.%).
Raw MaterialSiO2Al2O3CaOFe2O3MgOMnOP2O5SO3OtherLoss of Ignition
SS14.746.5136.1315.189.212.731.161.058.424.87
GBFS31.0314.9240.850.278.030.470.012.481.600.34
Cement20.244.1162.923.062.540.070.142.311.433.18
Table 2. Grain grading of 5–10 mm basalt crushed stones.
Table 2. Grain grading of 5–10 mm basalt crushed stones.
Aperture Size/mm0~2.362.36~4.754.75~9.509.50~13.2
Grading/%0.46.192.01.5
Table 3. Grain grading of 10–20 mm basalt crushed stones.
Table 3. Grain grading of 10–20 mm basalt crushed stones.
Aperture Size/mm0~2.362.36~4.754.75~9.509.50~13.213.2~16.016.0~19.0
Grading/%0.20.27.983.94.63.2
Table 4. Grain grading of high titanium heavy slag sand.
Table 4. Grain grading of high titanium heavy slag sand.
Aperture Size/mm<0.150.15~0.30.3~0.60.6~1.181.18~2.362.36~4.75≥4.75
Grading/%1.74.523.325.728.216.60
Table 5. Mixing proportions of the blended pastes (wt.%).
Table 5. Mixing proportions of the blended pastes (wt.%).
No.SSGBFSCementNa2SO4Na2CO3Na2SiO3Boraxw/b
Ratio
Superplasticizer
C365410----0.253.2
S13654101--0.20.283.2
S23654102--0.20.283.2
S33654103--0.20.283.2
S43654104--0.20.283.2
S53654105--0.20.283.2
C1365410-1-0.20.283.2
C2365410-2-0.20.283.2
C3365410-3-0.20.283.2
C4365410-4-0.20.283.2
C5365410-5-0.20.283.2
Si1365410--10.20.283.2
Si2365410--20.20.283.2
Si3365410--30.20.283.2
Si4365410--40.20.283.2
Si5365410--50.20.283.2
Table 6. Combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 (wt.%).
Table 6. Combined activation of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 (wt.%).
No.SSGBFSCementNa2SiO3Na2SO4Borax
Si3S0.536541030.50.2
Si3S136541031.00.2
Si3S1.536541031.50.2
Si3S236541032.00.2
Si3S2.536541032.50.2
Table 7. Mixing proportion of GBFS-SS composite pavement concrete (kg/m3).
Table 7. Mixing proportion of GBFS-SS composite pavement concrete (kg/m3).
No.GBFSSSCementBasalt StoneSandWaterSuperplasticizer
/%
Borax
/%
Activators and
Content/%
Cc324216609566921563.6--
S3c324216609407081622.40.23% Na2SO4
Si3c3.23% Na2SiO3
Si3S1c3.83% Na2SiO3
+1% Na2SO4
Table 8. The freeze–thaw cycling resistance of concrete with different activators.
Table 8. The freeze–thaw cycling resistance of concrete with different activators.
No.Mass Loss Ratio/%Compressive Strength Loss
Ratio/%
Classification
25 Times50 Times100 Times25 Times50 Times100 Times
Cc0.520.711.015.248.0111.87>D100
S30.370.540.803.866.129.51>D100
Si30.380.500.843.726.269.38>D100
Si3S10.340.470.733.365.928.74>D100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Q.; Sun, X. The Preparation of Ground Blast Furnace Slag-Steel Slag Pavement Concrete Using Different Activators and Its Performance Investigation. Buildings 2023, 13, 1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071590

AMA Style

Yang J, Liu L, Zhang G, Ding Q, Sun X. The Preparation of Ground Blast Furnace Slag-Steel Slag Pavement Concrete Using Different Activators and Its Performance Investigation. Buildings. 2023; 13(7):1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jun, Li Liu, Gaozhan Zhang, Qingjun Ding, and Xiaoping Sun. 2023. "The Preparation of Ground Blast Furnace Slag-Steel Slag Pavement Concrete Using Different Activators and Its Performance Investigation" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop