# The Impacts of Symmetry in Architecture and Urbanism: Toward a New Research Agenda

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Definition and Background

## 3. Classes of Symmetry

**reflectional**(Figure 1a and Figure 2a), in which one geometric configuration is reflected across an axis. For example, in many Classical buildings, the axis is the centreline of the building, and the façade as it appears on one side of the axis is exactly reproduced on the other in a matching progression (identical geometries moving to left as moving to right). It is common to say that one side is the “mirror image” of the other. In nature, a reflection in a body of water has a vertical reflectional symmetry with the scene above it, across the axis of the horizon.

**rotational**(Figure 1b and Figure 2b), in which a configuration is symmetrical as it rotates about a point. A perfect circle has a rotational symmetry about the centre point of the circle. Many structures in nature have rotational symmetry at least in part: planetary bodies, the iris of the human eye, an inflated balloon (except where its nozzle distorts the shape) and so on. In the case of the inflated balloon, the symmetry of its shape is a product of the symmetry of the pressures radiating outward from within the balloon.

**translational**symmetry (Figure 1c and Figure 2c) is a correspondence between different shapes that may not be otherwise symmetrical about an axis. For example, a repeated figure has a translational symmetry with itself. In architecture, one part of a repeated motif has a translational symmetry with another part. A child’s blue eyes can be said to express a translational symmetry with its parents’ identical blue eyes (and the child may have partial translational symmetries in other respects, e.g., shape of the face, etc.)

**scaling**symmetry (Figure 1d and Figure 2d) is similar to a translational symmetry, but instead of symmetry across positions, the symmetry occurs also across sizes. The most familiar example is the so-called fractal pattern, in which the same geometry is visible at multiple scales.

**Symmetry breaking,**though not strictly speaking a class of symmetry in its own right, is an important process of symmetry formation and transformation, and therefore it is included as an important element in this list. When existing symmetries are perturbed or “broken,” they often produce new symmetries at smaller scales, or new compound structures combining smaller symmetries and partial asymmetries (Figure 3). For example, a tubular structure, which is symmetrical about its axis, may break at some point along the axis, producing a new form of mirror symmetry. It is now understood that many classes of biological morphogenesis rely on broken symmetries to generate new compound symmetries, and importantly, complex body geometries as well as functionalities in organisms [20]. Symmetry breaking also plays a large role in recent theories of physics and cosmology [21,22]. It may be that symmetry, together with the process of its breaking and recombining into new complex forms, is a fundamental aspect of the evolving structure of the Universe at many different scales.

**information**symmetry is a symmetry that is not per se between geometric forms, but has some other more abstract correspondence. At its most fundamental level, mathematics is a representation of symmetries, or preserved correspondences, in the transformation of mathematical constructs [23]. The familiar “equal” sign in a formula expresses just such a symmetry. As forms of information, these constructs can therefore be described as a major class of “information symmetry.” One can also describe an “information symmetry” between the pattern of a DNA sequence and the complex protein that it generates, which in turn allows the “information” to be further transmitted, e.g., through inheritance. In the realm of human technology, one could describe an information symmetry between the pattern of grooves in a vinyl audio recording and the changes in air pressure at the microphone or speaker, corresponding to the sounds that are made or heard (Figure 4). Any language or code can be said to contain information symmetries as well, for example, the symmetries between a symbol and its referent, or a map and its territory. In the case of literature, information symmetries can take the form of analogies or metaphors. In the case of the built environment, they can take the form of literal signs or symbols.

**Compound**symmetries, which combine other kinds of symmetry into more complex forms, are what is experienced most commonly in natural and human environments. Many classic tile patterns and motifs combine reflectional and translational symmetry, in what is known as a glide reflection (Figure 5): a figure is repeated, then reflected across a glide axis [24]. The three basic plane symmetries, plus their 14 possible combinations, form 17 symmetry groups in two dimensions (called “wallpaper groups”). The familiar kaleidoscope pattern is also a compound symmetry in two dimensions (Figure 6).

## 4. Theories of Symmetry in History

“…a proper agreement between the members of the work itself, and relation between the different parts and the whole general scheme, in accordance with a certain part selected as standard. Thus, in the human body there is a kind of symmetrical harmony … and so it is with perfect buildings.”[29] (Book 2, Chapter 2)

“Beauty is a kind of concord and mutual interplay of the parts of a thing. This concord is realized in a particular number, proportion, and arrangement demanded by harmony, which is the fundamental principle of nature… There are three basic things which contain everything that we seek: number, what I have called proportion, and arrangement (numerus, finitio, collocatio). But besides these there is something else which originates from the linking and mutual relationship of these things, and which makes the surface of beauty glisten with a marvelous brilliance; this thing we call harmony (concinnitas).”[31] (Book 9, Section 5, pp. 337–340)

## 5. Modern Developments

## 6. The Role of Symmetry in Biology

## 7. The Role of Symmetry in Human Biology

## 8. Evidence for the Health Impacts of Symmetry and Its Absence

## 9. Applications of Symmetry to Built Environments: Art in Service to Life

- “Create many linked symmetries of different types as a response to activities on distinct scales (but don’t impose a global overall symmetry)…
- “Implement approximate spatial correlations using similarities at a distance and scaling symmetries (i.e., similarity under magnification)...” [56] (p. 52)

- Levels of Scale (similar figures at a range of scales)
- Strong Centers (prominent geometrical zones in between others)
- Boundaries (geometrical zones that bound others, e.g., centers)
- Alternating Repetition (patterns that repeat with some alternating variation)
- Positive Space (a geometric region that does not have excessively acute sub-regions)
- Good Shape (a geometric region that is coherent and interrelated)
- Local Symmetries (groups of regions that are internally symmetrical but may not be externally symmetrical)
- Deep Interlock and Ambiguity (patterns that inter-relate in complex ways)
- Contrast (adjacent figures that are starkly different from one another)
- Gradients (figures whose characteristics gradually transition)
- Roughness (figures with many small-scale asymmetrical characteristics)
- Echoes (figures that repeat some aspect from other figures)
- The Void (areas where few or no figures are present)
- Simplicity and Inner Calm (overall figures that are highly unified and harmonious)
- Not-separateness (connectedness of all figures to one another and to the viewer)

- Levels of Scale (scaling symmetries)
- Strong Centers (rotational, reflectional symmetries)
- Boundaries (rotational, reflectional symmetries)
- Alternating Repetition (compound symmetries)
- Positive Space (net convex symmetrical spaces)
- Good Shape (coherent symmetrical shapes)
- Local Symmetries (reflectional symmetries within symmetry breaking)
- Deep Interlock and Ambiguity (translational symmetries)
- Contrast (reflectional symmetries)
- Gradients (translational symmetries)
- Roughness (translational symmetries)
- Echoes (deep translational symmetries)
- The Void (symmetry void)
- Simplicity and Inner Calm (symmetry simplicity ratio)
- Not-separateness (ultimate symmetry, with symmetry breaking, of all things)

“…life, as I have defined it, is mathematical. By this I mean that it arises because of the mathematics of space itself. Since living structures arise primarily as symmetries and structures of symmetries, their presence and their density can, in principle, be calculated for any given configuration.”[55] (p. 469)

## 10. A Basic Distinction

- The immense structures of the physical world, with their vastly complex geometric properties;
- One’s innate experiences of these structures, which are conditioned by humans’ evolution as complex neurological organisms; and
- One’s own synthetic mental constructs, which sometimes interact with these physical symmetries and one’s experiences of them, and sometimes go into other directions, creating linguistic or artistic symbols, metaphors, allegories, artworks, and other constructions.

## 11. Tentative Conclusions and Hypotheses for a New Research Agenda

**Hypothesis 1.**

**Hypothesis 2.**

**Hypothesis 3.**

**Hypothesis 4.**

**Hypothesis 5.**

**Hypothesis 6.**

## 12. Discussion

## 13. Conclusions

- A clarified understanding of the ways that people are impacted by buildings and urban environments containing varying forms of symmetry under varying circumstances, and the lessons to draw about likely shared reactions and evaluations.
- A clarified understanding of the measurable impacts of symmetry on different aspects of human health and well-being, and the conditions under which these impacts occur.
- A clarified understanding of the role that symmetry might play in achieving other urban goals, including walkability, active public space, social capital, urban resilience, low-carbon living, and mitigation of loneliness.
- A better articulated understanding of the different forms and combinations of symmetry, including “deep symmetry” (as initially outlined herein), and how they combine and interact to produce human impacts.
- New methods for defining and measuring these forms of symmetry, building on the work of Alexander, Salingaros, and others, and providing useful diagnostic and design guidance tools.
- Articulation of the philosophical framework of “symmetric structuralism” described herein, in order to provide a comprehensible and useful model of the relationships between these issues.
- Finally, and perhaps most controversially—but supported by evidence—new normative and practical guidance for inclusion of these geometric characteristics in building design so as to enhance positive user impacts and attenuate negative ones, as part of responsible professional practice.

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Salvadori, M. Can there be any relationships between mathematics and architecture? In Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future: Volume I: From Antiquity to the 1500s; Williams, K., Ostwald, M.J., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 25–29. [Google Scholar]
- Padovan, R. Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Mehaffy, M.W.; Salingaros, N.A. Design for a Living Planet: Settlement, Science, and the Human Future; Sustasis Press: Portland, OR, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, N. Aesthetic judgement and environmental design: Is it entirely subjective? Town Plan. Rev.
**1994**, 65, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cold, B. Aesthetics, Well-Being and Health: Abstracts on Theoretical and Empirical Research within Environmental Aesthetics; Norsk Form: Oslo, Norway, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Stamps, III; Arthur, E. Formal and nonformal stimulus factors in environmental preference. Percept. Mot. Ski.
**1994**, 79, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ulrich, R.S. Aesthetic and Emotional Influences of Vegetation: A Review of the Scientific Literature; Swedish Council for Building Research: Stockholm, Sweden, 1985; Volume 22. [Google Scholar]
- Berg, A.E.V.D.; Koole, S.L.; Van Der Wulp, N.Y. Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? J. Environ. Psychol.
**2003**, 23, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dosen, A.S.; Ostwald, M.J.; Dawes, M.J. Environmental preference and spatio-visual geometry: A method for combining isovists and psychological testing. In Proceedings of the 47th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, Hong Kong, China, 13–16 November 2013; pp. 653–662. [Google Scholar]
- Hagerhall, C.M.; Purcell, T.; Taylor, R. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J. Environ. Psychol.
**2004**, 24, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Weyl, H. Symmetry; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Lockwood, E.H.; Macmillan, R.H. Geometric Symmetry; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Petitjean, M. Chirality and symmetry measures: A transdisciplinary review. Entropy
**2003**, 5, 271–312. [Google Scholar] - Jaynes, E.T. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev.
**1957**, 106, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Collier, J. Information originates in symmetry breaking. Symmetry Cult. Sci.
**1996**, 7, 247–256. [Google Scholar] - Marijuán, P.C. Information and symmetry in the biological and social realm: New avenues of inquiry. Symmetry Cult. Sci.
**1996**, 7, 281. [Google Scholar] - Bekenstein, J.D. Black holes and information theory. Contemp. Phys.
**2004**, 45, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Zurek, W.H. Cosmology: The shards of broken symmetry. Nature
**1996**, 382, 296–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mainzer, K. Symmetry and Complexity: The Spirit and Beauty of Nonlinear Science; World Scientific: Singapore, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Isaeva, V.V.; Kasyanov, N.V.; Presnov, E.V. Topological singularities and symmetry breaking in development. Biosystems
**2012**, 109, 280–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Weinberg, S. Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking: An addendum. Phys. Rev. D
**1979**, 19, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Albrecht, A.; Steinhardt, P.J. Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1982**, 48, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stewart, I. Why Beauty Is Truth: A History of Symmetry; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Salingaros, N.A. The patterns of architecture. In T3XTURE No. 3; Burke, L., Sovich, R., Purcell, C., Eds.; CreateSpace: Scotts Valley, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hodgson, D. The first appearance of symmetry in the human lineage: Where perception meets art. Symmetry
**2011**, 3, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Rossi, C. Architecture and Mathematics in Ancient Egypt; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Maor, E. The Pythagorean Theorem: A 4,000-Year History; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2007; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
- Kahn, C.H. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans; Hackett Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Pollio, M.V. The Ten Books on Architecture; Rowland, I., Howe, T., Eds. and Translators; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Hon, G.; Goldstein, B.R. From proportion to balance: The background to symmetry in science. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A
**2005**, 36, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alberti, L.B. On the Art of Building in Ten Books; Rykwert, J., Leach, N., Tavernor, R., Translators; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Birkhoff, G. Aesthetic Measure; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1933. [Google Scholar]
- Eysenck, H.J. The experimental study of the ‘good Gestalt’—A new approach. Psychol. Rev.
**1942**, 49, 344–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher, Y. Fractal Image Compression: Theory and Application; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Dafni, A.; Lehrer, M.; Keyan, P.G. Spatial flower parameters and insect spatial vision. Biol. Rev.
**1997**, 72, 239–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ushimaru, A.; Hyodo, F. Why do bilaterally symmetrical flowers orient vertically? Flower orientation influences pollinator landing behaviour. Evol. Ecol. Res.
**2005**, 7, 151–160. [Google Scholar] - Manuel, M. Early evolution of symmetry and polarity in metazoan body plans. Comptes Rendus Biol.
**2009**, 332, 184–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rensing, S.A. (Why) does evolution favour embryogenesis? Trends Plant Sci.
**2016**, 21, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Watson, P.J.; Thornhill, R. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol.
**1994**, 9, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Enquist, M.; Arak, A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature
**1994**, 372, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Grammer, K.; Thornhill, R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. J. Comp. Psychol.
**1994**, 108, 233. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] - Rhodes, G.; Proffitt, F.; Grady, J.M.; Sumich, A. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon. Bull. Rev.
**1998**, 5, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Jacobsen, T.; Schubotz, R.I.; Höfel, L.; Cramon, D.Y.V. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage
**2006**, 29, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ulrich, R. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science
**1984**, 224, 420–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kellert, S.R.; Wilson, E.O. The Biophilia Hypothesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Kellert, S.; Heerwagen, J.; Mador, M. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Louv, R. Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder; Algonquin Books: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Grinde, B.; Patil, G.G. Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
**2009**, 6, 2332–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kellert, S.R. Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations; Kahn, P.H., Jr., Kellert, S.R., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Zeki, S. Beauty in Architecture: Not a Luxury—Only a Necessity. Archit. Des.
**2019**, 89, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zeki, S.; Chén, O.Y.; Romaya, J.P. The biological basis of mathematical beauty. Front. Hum. Neurosci.
**2018**, 12, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Salingaros, N.A. Symmetry gives meaning to architecture. Symmetry Cult. Sci.
**2020**, 31, 231–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alexander, C. The Nature of Order: Book One; Center for the Environmental Structure: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Salingaros, N.A. Adaptive versus random complexity. New Des. Ideas
**2018**, 2, 51–61. [Google Scholar] - Whitehead, A.N. Process and Reality; MacMillan and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1929. [Google Scholar]
- Whitehead, A.N. Modes of Thought; MacMillan and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1938. [Google Scholar]
- Salingaros, N.A. Life and complexity in architecture from a thermodynamic analogy. Phys. Essays
**1997**, 10, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mehaffy, M.W. Quality of Life by Design: The Science of a Structuralist Revolution. The Athens Dialogues E-Journal, November 2010. Available online: http://athensdialogues.chs.harvard.edu/cgibin/WebObjects/athensdialogues.woa/1/wo/4p9LWXBiTLKVYfuLNs10mM/2.0.57.5.1.1.3 (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Zeki, S.; Romaya, J.P.; Benincasa, D.M.; Atiyah, M.F. The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Front. Hum. Neurosci.
**2014**, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Mehaffy, M.W. Architectural education: Still training tailors for the empire’s new clothes. New Des. Ideas
**2019**, 3, 154–158. [Google Scholar] - Trope, Y.; Liberman, N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev.
**2010**, 117, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Mehaffy, M.W.; Salingaros, N.A. Geometrical Fundamentalism. Plan Net Online Architectural Resources (Website), November 2001. Available online: https://patterns.architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-172613 (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Mehaffy, M.W.; Salingaros, N.A. Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, not People. Shareable (Website), 5 October 2011. Available online: https://www.shareable.net/architectural-myopia-designing-for-industry-not-people/ (accessed on 6 November 2020).

**Figure 1.**Examples of (

**a**) reflectional, (

**b**) rotational, (

**c**) translational and (

**d**) scaling symmetries in natural forms (tiger face, sun corona, mother and baby ducks, and fern leaves). Left image: S Taheri via Wikimedia Commons. Other images in public domain.

**Figure 2.**Examples of (

**a**) reflectional, (

**b**) rotational, (

**c**) translational and (

**d**) scaling symmetries in human architectural forms (Classical façade, stained glass window, archway tile motif, repeating arch shapes at different sizes). Images: Ryan Kaldari (left) and Thomas Ledi (second from left) via Wikimedia Commons. Other images in public domain.

**Figure 3.**An example of symmetry breaking in a drop of milk as it collides with a thin sheet of milk, shown in a famous series of photos by Harold Edgerton. The new structure is not a disordered mess, but in fact exhibits new forms of symmetry at smaller scales. Such processes are thought to be fundamental to the generation of structure in biological and natural systems. Images: courtesy of the Edgerton Digital Collections.

**Figure 4.**Two examples of information symmetries, one in human technologies—the encoding of audio information on a vinyl record (

**a**), and one in biological systems—the genetic code for the synthesis of proteins and other complex molecules in an organism (

**b**). Images: MIK81 (left), TBraunstein (center) via Wikimedia Commons. Image on the right in public domain.

**Figure 5.**A simple glide reflection (

**a**), and a more complex “wallpaper group” (

**b**). A figure is repeated, then reflected again along a glide axis. This process may be repeated to produce larger groups. Images: Kelvinsong and Martin von Gagern via Wikimedia Commons.

**Figure 6.**A view through a kaleidoscope, which seems to exhibit rotational symmetry (

**a**) In fact, it exhibits a compound form of reflectional symmetries (

**b**) created by mirrors within the kaleidoscope tube, which together form multiple reflectional planes (blue lines on the right). When aggregated together, they appear as rotational symmetry, also compounded together with many translational symmetries as well. This example also cleverly makes use of the reflectional sub-symmetries in the shell patterns, also producing scalar symmetries. Such patterns are widely regarded as beautiful. Images: public domain.

**Figure 7.**Most environments exhibit compound symmetries, including reflectional, rotational, translational, scaling, and broken symmetries. Humans are adept at perceiving these symmetries and the order that they manifest. Image: Sebastien Gabriel via Unsplash.

**Figure 8.**Fractal patterns generated by remarkably simple recursive mathematical formulas. Images: public domain.

**Figure 9.**The human face incorporates many classes of symmetry in compound and interrelated forms, as can be seen in the markings at right. Reflectional symmetry occurs across the dotted lines, rotational symmetry occurs in the circles or arcs around the points, translational symmetry occurs in the repeated curve patterns, and scalar symmetry occurs in the repetition of patterns at smaller scales, e.g., hairline-eyebrow-eyelash, etc. Finally, information symmetry occurs between the subject and the viewer’s instinctive ability to read biological signals of health (e.g., in clear skin, etc.) Images: the author.

**Figure 10.**Two urban environments in London, UK. The environment on the left includes literal natural forms as well as their properties, notably reflectional, scaling, translational and scaling symmetries. The environment on the right has few such characteristics. Images: the author.

**Figure 11.**Alexander’s “fifteen properties” of geometric order in human and natural environments. Illustration: the author.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Mehaffy, M.W.
The Impacts of Symmetry in Architecture and Urbanism: Toward a New Research Agenda. *Buildings* **2020**, *10*, 249.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120249

**AMA Style**

Mehaffy MW.
The Impacts of Symmetry in Architecture and Urbanism: Toward a New Research Agenda. *Buildings*. 2020; 10(12):249.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120249

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Mehaffy, Michael W.
2020. "The Impacts of Symmetry in Architecture and Urbanism: Toward a New Research Agenda" *Buildings* 10, no. 12: 249.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120249