Next Article in Journal
Sea-Level Rise, Human Rights, and State Responsibility: Advisory Opinions in an Interdependent International Legal Order
Next Article in Special Issue
Dialogue with the Disabled “Other”: Expanding Legal Frameworks of Civil-Civic Engagement to Enhance Inclusion of Individuals with Down Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Law in Transition: A Scoping Review and Doctrinal Comparative Analysis of Ukraine and Lithuania
Previous Article in Special Issue
Who Protects Religious Liberty? Judicial Power, Free Exercise, and Civic Thought
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Political Economy as Civic Education: A Contested-Principles Approach to New Statutory Requirements in Ohio

The Ashbrook Center, Ashland University, Ashland, OH 44805, USA
Laws 2026, 15(4), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040070
Submission received: 4 May 2026 / Revised: 2 July 2026 / Accepted: 7 July 2026 / Published: 10 July 2026

Abstract

The Advance Ohio Higher Education Act of 2025 legally requires public universities in Ohio to teach students specific economics content but bans instructors from addressing controversial topics in a biased manner. Rather than avoid controversial issues, civic education should focus on contested fundamental economic principles for two reasons. First, it is a safer strategy for legal compliance. Second, teaching contested principles is a pedagogical boon for the education of citizens in which no single disciplinary perspective can be authoritative. There are both practical dilemmas and pedagogical upsides to the new regulatory environment that are unforeseen in the scholarly literature related to law and economics and the economics of civic education. The contested-principles approach to civics-focused economic education, developed here, is relevant beyond Ohio: to new public institutes of civic education across the United States, to universities that anticipate similar legal requirements, and to anyone interested in unforeseen pedagogical benefits of higher-education law.
Keywords: civic education; educational policy; financial literacy; law and economics; political economy; Adam Smith civic education; educational policy; financial literacy; law and economics; political economy; Adam Smith

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wyllie, R. Political Economy as Civic Education: A Contested-Principles Approach to New Statutory Requirements in Ohio. Laws 2026, 15, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040070

AMA Style

Wyllie R. Political Economy as Civic Education: A Contested-Principles Approach to New Statutory Requirements in Ohio. Laws. 2026; 15(4):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wyllie, Robert. 2026. "Political Economy as Civic Education: A Contested-Principles Approach to New Statutory Requirements in Ohio" Laws 15, no. 4: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040070

APA Style

Wyllie, R. (2026). Political Economy as Civic Education: A Contested-Principles Approach to New Statutory Requirements in Ohio. Laws, 15(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop