Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Legal Profession in the Era of Digital Capitalism: Disruption or New Dawn?
Previous Article in Journal
Seemingly Connected, Obviously Separate: The Parallel Realities of the UN Global Compact and the Multilateral Regimes in Water Governance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reform of the Belgian Justice System: Changes to the Role of Jurisdiction Chief, the Empowerment of Local Managers
Article

Pressure on Judges: How the Budgeting System Can Impact on Judge’s Autonomy

Italian Research Institute on Judicial Systems-National Research Council of Italy (IRSIG-CNR), 40126 Bologna, Italy
Received: 19 November 2018 / Revised: 5 December 2018 / Accepted: 13 December 2018 / Published: 19 December 2018
Performance-based budgeting is a label that groups different budgeting models, developed in the New Public Management era, that link the funding to the performance of agencies. If European justice systems have been unresponsive to apply managerial techniques to courts, this is particularly true for modern budgeting techniques. Courts’ budgets have been, and still are in many cases, drafted only on historical costs, and, although important for the court functioning, it has been one of the most neglected subjects in court administration studies. In recent years, some countries have been developing new approaches to justice systems and court budgeting, using a “performance-based” budget perspective, which relates the courts’ budget to the efficiency results, setting specific performance targets. Although fundamental to ensure transparency, accountability, and proper resource allocation among courts, these approaches have an impact on judicial independence and autonomy, because they may put pressure on judges’ productivity and efficiency, to the detriment of quality. Building on two case studies, Finland and The Netherlands, this paper aims to analyze how, and to what extent, the “performance-based” budgeting system is influencing the functioning of courts and the autonomy of judges. View Full-Text
Keywords: court administration; judicial independence and accountability; judges’ behavior; efficiency; performance-based budget court administration; judicial independence and accountability; judges’ behavior; efficiency; performance-based budget
MDPI and ACS Style

Viapiana, F. Pressure on Judges: How the Budgeting System Can Impact on Judge’s Autonomy. Laws 2018, 7, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7040038

AMA Style

Viapiana F. Pressure on Judges: How the Budgeting System Can Impact on Judge’s Autonomy. Laws. 2018; 7(4):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7040038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Viapiana, Federica. 2018. "Pressure on Judges: How the Budgeting System Can Impact on Judge’s Autonomy" Laws 7, no. 4: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7040038

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop