3.1. Initial Mechanical Properties and the Influence of Heat Treatments on Microstructure
The addition of Nd and La generally improves the yield strength in tension (TYS) and compression (CYS), but reduces the ductility (elongation and compressive strain CS) compared with the binary Mg-Gd alloy, see
Table 1 (the data is taken from Reference [
5]). The ultimate strength in tension (UTS) and compression (UCS) does not change significantly in the ternary and quaternary alloys, resulting in an increase in a yield to tensile stress ratio, in short, a yield-tensile ratio. Mg10Gd has a yield-tensile ratio of 0.53, which increases for the quaternary alloy system Mg10Gd1Nd1La to a ratio of 0.65. The same trend is seen under compression; Mg10Gd has a yield-compressive ratio of 0.33, and the quaternary alloy system Mg10Gd1Nd1La of 0.41. There is no significant tension-compression yield asymmetry, but because of the preferred loading conditions, there is a much higher UCS.
The micro-hardness (HV1) of samples increases with increasing amounts of alloying elements. La, compared to Nd, shows a more pronounced effect on hardness. Due to the low solubility of La in Mg, the volume fraction of secondary phases is higher than in Mg-Nd. As a result of the complex lattice structure of secondary phases, the hardness is higher, which unfortunately results in a higher brittleness.
A rather small grain size (<24 µm), developed by dynamic recrystallization during extrusion, is described in Reference [
5]. Adding Nd and/or La (see
Table 2) decreases the average grain size down to 13 µm and increases the volume fraction of secondary phases, mainly Mg
5 (Gd,
x), where
x = 0, and/or 1 wt.% Nd, and/or La, which are dispersed in the extrusion direction, see the horizontal alignment in
Figure 1. The secondary phases in the alloys containing La reaches a size of several µm.
During solution heat treatment (T4), most secondary phases are dissolved in Mg10Gd and Mg10Gd1Nd (apart from some cuboid shaped phases of GdH2). The alloys containing La still show remaining secondary phases of globular shape and uniform distribution. The low solubility of the alloying element Nd, and especially of the alloying element La, explains the remaining secondary phases, even after solution heat treatment of 24 h.
T4 increases the grain size significantly, especially for the binary Mg10Gd alloy, where the grains grow from 24 µm to 140 µm (see
Figure 2). Alloying Nd and La hinders grain growth, the secondary phases reduce the grain boundary mobility, and the grain size only increases up to 90 µm. Alloying with Nd rather than alloying with La acts slightly more positively to restricting grain growth—during T4, the grains in Mg10Gd1Nd grow to 106 µm, and in Mg10Gd1La, up to 119 µm.
During precipitation hardening (T6) over 16 h, the grain size does not change greatly, compared to the solution heat-treated condition (
Figure 2). Either the thermal activity is low enough or the precipitates seem to pin grain boundaries, and therefore limits grain boundary mobility. Only in the binary system Mg10Gd do the larger grains grow, see the micrographs in
Figure 3 and the grain size distribution in the histograms in
Figure 4.
Figure 4a shows a shift of counts (number of grains) towards larger grains (grey bars compared to black bars); small grains (up to 20 µm) disappear, and medium and larger grains grow, even occasionally up to a few hundred µm. Such large grains are not found in the higher alloyed systems (
Figure 4b–d).
3.2. Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties: Hardness and Bending Strength
Solution heat treatment (T4) reduces the hardness of all four alloys (
Figure 5). The greatest decrease is found for the binary system Mg10Gd, where the grain growth is the most pronounced and all the secondary phases are dissolved in solid solution. The quaternary alloy Mg10Gd1Nd1La retains the highest hardness. Here, the secondary phases, which are not dissolvable, are affecting the hardness, as well as hindering the grain size and mobility during heat treatment.
The age-hardening response (T6) is the lowest for Mg10Gd (
Figure 5), where, after 12 h, the greatest hardness was found. Apart from an overall higher hardness, adding La alone (as in Mg10Gd1La) does not show any significant effect on increasing the hardness during T6 (peak aged condition after 4 h). Adding Nd on the other hand shows a remarkable increase in hardness during T6 in Mg10Gd1Nd and Mg10Gd1Nd1La, peak aged condition is reached after 12 h for Mg10Gd1Nd and after 10h for Mg10Gd1Nd1La.
Figure 6a shows the bending stress-outer strain curves of extruded Mg10Gd
xNd
xLa in the 3-point bending tests [
5]. The binary alloy Mg10Gd shows the highest outer strain before fracture. Alloying reduces outer strain, especially when La is added. Brittle and coarse secondary phases containing La causes micro cracks, even before the main crack initiates, see
Figure 7b. Unexpectedly, T6 could not improve fracture toughness (
Figure 6b), mostly because of the strong grain growth and low solubility of La in Mg, which does not refine the secondary phases. Due to the strong grain growth in Mg10Gd, the ductility was significantly reduced. However, apart from Mg10Gd, all alloys showed an increased yield strength, especially the alloys containing Nd. Overall, there is no improvement in toughness by precipitation heat treatment, mainly because of the much lower ductility. Mg10Gd1Nd loses ductility the greatest—here, many hydrides are found in the fracture surface.
Crack propagation under 3-point bending, in extruded Mg10Gd and Mg10Gd1Nd, is mostly driven by micro-cracks at the twin boundary (see micro-cracks in the area around the crack tip in Mg10Gd in
Figure 7a and also the images in Reference [
5]). The crack-tip stress field causes micro cracks at twin boundaries nearby. The alloys with La showed a suppressed twinning, but crack initiation and propagation was caused by brittle and coarse precipitates (see area around the crack tip in Mg10Gd1Nd1La in
Figure 7c). The brittle and coarse precipitates fracture (micro cracking) in the plastic deformation zone in front of the crack tip and redirect the crack propagation according to the crack-tip stress field. Comparing
Figure 7d–b, the fracture surface of Mg10Gd1Nd1La shows a high amount of micro cracks along the main crack. The SEM image of Mg10Gd (
Figure 7b) displays the presence of dimples, which are indicative of ductile failure, and a small fraction of cleavage steps. The micrograph of extruded Mg10Gd1Nd1La (
Figure 7c) shows a rather straight line in crack growth, the fraction of cleavage steps has almost disappeared.
Since the brittle and coarse secondary phases, in the La containing alloys, play an important (negative) role in crack initiation, 3-point bending tests were carried out up to a certain outer strain value that did not cause the main crack to initiate (outer strain values of 8%, 10%, and 12% were chosen). The aim was to check whether there are micro cracks prior to the main crack. The micrographs in
Figure 8 show representative images of the areas of the highest tension and compression of the alloy Mg10Gd1Nd1La.
Figure 8a shows a surface area at the tension side of a sample strained to 8%. It can be seen that the large particles are cracked (bottom left) and would initiate the crack in the matrix material by further loading.
At this stage there are not many twinned grains at the tension side. The micrograph in
Figure 8b shows the compression side at 10% strain and reveals many twinned grains. The particles, on the other hand, are not cracked. That indicated that they are only acting in a brittle manner when tensile loading is applied.
Figure 8c,d show micrographs at the tension side at 10 and 12% strain. The amount of cracked particles has increased. It can be seen that the larger particles crack first. Strain twinning is also found, mainly in the coarser grains. Taking these images together explains the reduction in ductility by alloying La; the main crack gets “guided” by cracked particles, giving a path of less resistance to crack propagation.
3.4. Heat Treatment and Corrosion
Figure 10 shows the optical morphology of the samples after corrosion—by immersion and treatment with chromic acid. A difference among the alloys, as well as the material condition, can be clearly seen. Mg10Gd, independent of the heat treatment condition and all alloys in T6 condition, do show some local corrosion, but an almost all-over passive corrosion layer is formed. The film developed is either grey-white in color or appears black. Adding Nd and/or La to Mg10Gd causes a significant proportion of material damage; corrosion of the extruded condition appears all-over and the T4 condition samples still show initial surface areas on the side surface. The corrosion rate, by the immersion of the alloys in T6 condition, is below 0.5 mm/year. Extruded and T4 conditions show very high corrosion rates.
Looking at the extruded condition first, alloying Nd to Mg10Gd increases the corrosion rate from 2.1 mm/year to 17.0 mm/year. Alloying La causes a corrosion rate of 36.8 mm/year and alloying Nd and La brings the corrosion rate slightly down to 30 mm/year. However, these high corrosion rates are not acceptable, and because of the finer grain size, compared to T4 and T6, this was not expected. Even if it was assumed that La was a substitute for Nd that would improve the corrosion resistance, no protective layer could have formed in static immersion in order to cause the highest corrosion rates from this series. Even the grain growth was significant during solution heat treatment; T4 brings the corrosion rates for the ternary and quaternary alloys down to 8.9 mm/year for Mg10Gd1Nd, 11.3 mm/year for Mg10Gd1La, and 22.6 mm/year for Mg10Gd1Nd1La. Only the binary alloy Mg10Gd shows a slight increase in corrosion rate by T4, from 2.1 to 3.5 mm/year, and here the grain growth was most pronounced (up to 140 µm). The role of the grain size is not completely clear yet, but often grain refinement acts positively on the corrosion rate [
17,
18]. However, in this study, other factors might have played a role. Solution heat treatment may have relieved internal stresses from extrusion and large Mg
5Gd particles, which are not at their best distribution, will have dissolved. Precipitation hardening seems to be the favorite heat treatment condition T6 for this alloy series; the grain size does not change significantly, compared to T4, and the formation of finer dispersed Mg
5X particles containing Gd and Nd, which only cause an increase in hardness when containing Nd, improves the corrosion resistance greatly, compared to the solution heat treated condition. It appears that the relationship between finer and coarser particles, as well as solute elements in the matrix in the aged condition, form a protective oxide layer which brings the corrosion rate down to less than 0.5 mm/year.
Just as important as the corrosion rate is the corrosion morphology. In this study, cross-sectional macro and micrographs have been used to evaluate the pit shape, depth, and width. Pits are caused under additional mechanical load stress peaks and are dangerous when they are deeper than they are wide. When corrosion pits under ongoing corrosion overlap, they form wide and shallow pits. Their notch effect is much smaller than in deep corrosion pits.
Figure 11a shows a representative cross-section of Mg10Gd1Nd in T6 condition after immersion testing—there is no corrosion attack at all. The pitting factor in this case is one (deepest pit divided by average corrosion taken from the corrosion rate). Mg10Gd1Nd seems to form an overall protecting and passive layer.
In
Figure 11b,c the cross-section macrographs of Mg10Gd1La after immersion in extruded and T6 conditions are shown.
Figure 11b represents all cross-sections investigated in the ternary and quaternary alloys in extruded and T4 conditions. The pitting factor start from to up to 6.2, see
Table 3. There is a strong correlation between the corrosion rate and the pitting factor. When the corrosion rate is high (alloying with Nd and/or La in extruded and T4 condition), the pitting factor is in a medium range. There are pits, but since they overlap during ongoing corrosion, they are not as deep. Adding La increases the corrosion rate significantly and brings the pitting factor down to 2.1 in the extruded condition, and to 3.7 in the T4 condition. From
Table 3, it can be seen that for Mg10Gd, the pitting factors are the highest due to having a low corrosion rate and an incomplete dense passive layer. The T4 condition shows the smallest value, while the corrosion rate is the highest. As mentioned before, precipitation hardening results in a very low corrosion rate, but apart from Mg10Gd1Nd, the passive layer is non-uniform and deep pits develop (see
Figure 11c for Mg10Gd1La), causing low pitting resistivity with pitting factors at a very high level. The notch effect under a mechanical load would be unacceptable.
Figure 12 shows the current density-potential curves from the polarization tests of Mg10Gd1Nd in different heat treatment conditions in
Figure 12a and in T6 conditions of all alloys in
Figure 12b.
The characteristics of anodic corrosion (
Figure 12a) do not differ much in Mg10Gd in regards to its dependence on the heat treatment condition. Around 250 mV, a slight passivation can be seen, and is most pronounced for T6. The corrosion behavior of the T6 condition of all alloys (
Figure 12b) does not differ much either. However, the binary alloy Mg10Gd does not show any hint of passivation—on the other hand, Mg10Gd1Nd shows the most.
Figure 13 compares the corrosion rate of the immersion tests (
Figure 13a, the values have been discussed already) and the cross-sectional corroded area of the polarization tests (
Figure 13b), which is used here to correlate to the corrosion rate. The difference in corrosion behavior is much smaller in polarization. The La-containing alloys show the largest differences in corrosion rate in immersion tests, but the smallest in polarization. The corrosion rate values, by the immersion of Mg10Gd in different heat treatment conditions, are very close, but scatter the most in polarization. This means that there is a strong dependence on the methodology of the corrosion test; in immersion tests the progress of corrosion damage is here obtained from the immersion length. Since there is no electrochemical load applied, the sample will behave as it would in an open circuit potential measurement and finds its equilibrium. The corrosion layer formed does not need to withstand increasing potential difference. Since, in polarization tests, the potential increases, anodic corrosion is forced, resulting in ongoing anodic corrosion, pseudo passivation, or passivation. The passive layer might break down.
The current density-potential curves shown, and their current density value at a potential of 500 mV, underlines the corrosion ability. In
Figure 12a, it can be seen that the current density value of the extruded Mg10Gd1Nd at 500 mV is the highest, agreeing with the highest corroded cross-sectional area in the diagram in
Figure 13b. T6 shows the lowest value of corroded area, agreeing with the lowest current density value. Similar agreement is found between the current density value at 500 mV and the corroded cross-sectional areas in the T6 condition in all alloys (
Figure 12b). The highest current density value (~30 mA/cm
2) for Mg10Gd agrees with the highest corroded area of 1.55 mm
2 in the cross-section macrograph (see
Figure 13b), Mg10Gd1Nd shows, for both data sets, the lowest value. However, other than in immersion, there seems to be no trend in polarization tests among the alloys and heat treatment conditions. Mg10Gd1Nd1La seems to act independent of the heat treatment condition in polarization tests.
The pitting factors with values around two are much smaller in polarization than in immersion (see
Table 4, evaluated from cross-sectional macrographs in
Figure 14). Due to ongoing anodic corrosion in polarization, pits start to overlap and form a more uniform corrosion morphology. The deepest pits are found around 356 µm in Mg10Gd1Nd (
Figure 14a), but due to a high average corrosion depth, it also causes a pitting factor of only two. Since the corrosion pits in polarization are often wide and shallow, they would not be very dangerous when exposed to an additional load. Pits in immersion samples reach depths up to 1000 µm. The correlation between the corrosion rate and the pitting factor is not seen in the polarization tests.
By taking the better mechanical properties of the extruded alloys Mg10Gd and Mg10Gd1Nd into account, where Mg10Gd1Nd even shows a higher bending yield strength, it can be stated that adding Nd increases the corrosion rate in both immersion (×8) and polarization (×1.15). This increase brings the pitting factor down, even more so in immersion from 15.1 to 3.5, compared to polarization from 2.2 to 2.1. Finally, by adding Nd and/or La, as well as applying different heat treatments, the mechanical and corrosion properties can be tailored. It is difficult to say which is the best condition among the alloys. It is certain however, that precipitation hardening did not improve the toughness, but did improve the corrosion rate. Mg10Gd1Nd has the highest resistivity to pitting corrosion.