Next Article in Journal
Novel Opposite Stirring Mode in Bloom Continuous Casting Mould by Combining Swirling Flow Nozzle with EMS
Previous Article in Journal
The Distribution and Severity of Corrosion Damage at Eight Distinct Zones of Metallic Femoral Stem Implants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Evolution of Mg-6 wt % Zn Alloy during Equal-Channel Angular Pressing

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Advanced Metallic Materials, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2018, 8(10), 841; https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100841
Submission received: 17 September 2018 / Revised: 7 October 2018 / Accepted: 16 October 2018 / Published: 18 October 2018

Abstract

:
Equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) was performed on a Mg (6 wt %) Zn alloy at temperatures from 160 to 240 °C and the microstructures and mechanical properties were studied using optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and an electronic universal testing machine. The results showed that ECAP was effective for grain refinement and a bi-modal grain structure formed at low temperatures, which was stable during ECAP from 160 to 200 °C. MgZn2 phase and Mg4Zn7 phase were generated during the ECAP process. The mechanical properties remarkably increased after two repetitions of ECAP. However, the strengths could not be further improved by increasing the plastic deformation, but decreased when ECAP was performed between 200 and 240 °C. The mechanical properties of the ECAP Mg-6Zn alloy was determined by a combination of grain refinement strengthening, precipitation hardening, and texture softening.

1. Introduction

As degradable materials, magnesium and its alloys are widely considered as prospective materials in the biomaterials field [1,2]. Compared with traditional metal implant materials and biodegradable polymers, magnesium alloys have excellent performance and function well as medical apparatuses, and thus have promoted the development of new medical products. Many effective alloying elements for Mg alloys strengthening have to be excluded to avoid the medical risk caused by degradable implants, and only a few elements are sufficiently safe in human bodies, such as zinc. Apart from the required bio-safety, what makes Mg-Zn-based alloy an important class of biodegradable materials is the good mechanical properties and corrosion resistance [3,4].
As a common severe plastic deformation (SPD) process, equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) is effective for grain refinement of magnesium alloys, which improves the alloys’ mechanical properties [5]. For example, a 120% increase in yield strength and 75% increase in elongation of ZE41A alloy was achieved after 32 repetitions of the ECAP process [6]. Previous studies on ultra-fined grain (UFG) magnesium alloys prepared by ECAP were mainly concentrated on grain refinement and texture evolution, and the principles of grain refinement and the mechanism of texture evolution were established [7,8,9]. In the Mg-Zn system, the possible intermetallic phase was hexagonal Laves MgZn2 phase, monoclinic Mg4Zn7 phase, MgZn phase, and Mg7Zn3 phase, depending on the processing conditions [10,11,12]. However, besides a few early studies on as-cast alloys, research on microstructure evolution in Mg-Zn alloys using severe plastic deformation or the conventional deformation process is rare.
In the present work, equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) was performed on a Mg (6 wt %)-Zn alloy at 160 °C, 200 °C, and 240 °C. The mechanical properties during the ECAP process were measured and the precipitation behavior of the alloy during the ECAP process was investigated by analyzing the type and morphology of the intermetallic compounds.

2. Materials and Methods

Raw materials of pure metals Mg (99.95%) and Zn (99.95%) were employed to prepare the cast Mg (6 wt %)-Zn alloy. The melting process was carried out in an electric resistance furnace under the protection of a mixed gas atmosphere of SF6 (1 vol %) and CO2 (99 vol %). The melt was held at 680 °C for 30 min and then poured into a cylindrical iron mold 60 mm in diameter. The as-casted billet was extruded into a round bar with a 15 mm diameter and the extrusion ratio of 16, and then machined into cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 15 mm and height of 80 mm.
ECAP, with a 90 degree internal angle between two channels, was performed via route BC (the specimen was rotated 90° counterclockwise between each pass) [13]. Three levels of experimental temperatures, 160 °C, 200 °C, and 240 °C, were selected for the ECAP process. The temperatures were maintained constant within ±1 °C during ECAP using an automatic temperature controller. ECAP pressing speed was maintained at about 1.5 mm/s. Before ECAP processing, the samples were put into the ECAP mold that had been heated up to experimental temperature and then the samples were held for at least 5 min. The lubricant during ECAP was a mixture of graphite powder and Vaseline with a mixing ratio of 1:1.
The room temperature tensile test was performed at a speed of 1 mm/min using MTS CMT5105 electronic universal testing machine (MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Round tension test specimens with diameter of 6.0 ± 0.1 mm and gauge length of 30.0 ± 0.1 mm were prepared according to ASTM E8M-16a. The mechanical properties were determined on five tension test specimens for each ECAP condition. Microstructural observations of the experimental alloys were carried out via optical microscopy (OM, Leica DMI3000M, Wetzlar, Germany) and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800II, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The phase analysis of the alloy was conducted by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and a field-emission transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Technai G2 20, Field Electron and Ion Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Mechanical Properties

Figure 1 shows the mechanical properties of Mg-6Zn alloys before and after ECAP processing for two, four, and six repetitions at room temperature. The ECAP temperature is an important factor that affects the mechanical properties of the samples after ECAP. At 160 °C, the strengths increased significantly after ECAP. For instance, the yield strength (YS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) increased to 265 MPa and 340 MPa, respectively, after two ECAP passes, about 32.5% and 30.8% higher than the sample before ECAP. At 200 °C, the YS and UTS were 245 MPa and 274 MPa, respectively, after two ECAP passes, both lower than the values at 160 °C. By contrast, a clearly visible decreasing trend in strength was observed in the sample that underwent ECAP at 240 °C. The yield strength of the sample after two passes and six passes of ECAP was 179 MPa and 170 MPa, respectively. However, the elongation of the samples for all the two, four, and six passes of ECAP increased with the increase of temperature, as shown in Figure 1c.
The strengths of the Mg-6Zn alloy did no constantly increase by improving plastic deformation. Both yield strength and ultimate tensile strength were remarkably improved after two passes of ECAP at 160 °C; however, the strengths were nearly unchanged with further plastic deformation (i.e., four passes and six passes of ECAP processing, as shown in Figure 1b,c). When ECAP processing was performed at 200 °C and 240 °C, the strengths decreased with increasing numbers of ECAP passes. The elongation of the samples significantly increased after two passes of ECAP at each temperature; however, it decreased with further plastic deformation at 160 °C but slightly fluctuated at 200 °C and increased a little at 240 °C.

3.2. Microstructure

Figure 2 shows the optical micrographs of the experimental Mg-6Zn alloy, in which the dark contrast phase represents intermetallics. The microstructure of the as-extruded alloy consisted of equiaxed grains with a size of ~15 μm and bulk eutectic structure distributed along the grain boundaries. Significant grain refinement and bi-modal grain structure (i.e., comprised of coarse grains and fine grains) were obtained after ECAP for two passes at 160 °C, as shown in Figure 2b. A heterogenous grain structure was usually produced under the condition of smaller deformation [14,15]. When ECAP passes were gradually increased up to six, the average grain size of the larger grains were ~4 μm and the grain size of the smaller grains mixed with intermetallic particles was ~1 μm, as shown in Figure 2c,d. The grain size of the alloy processed by the same ECAP pass increased with increasing ECAP temperature. At 200 °C, the bi-modal grain structure was also observed until the ECAP passes reached six, as shown in Figure 2e–g. The bi-modal grain structure disappeared when the ECAP temperature was elevated to 240 °C. After two passes of ECAP, the microstructure was no more refined but coarsened with increasing numbers of ECAP passes and the average grain size was ~7 μm after six passes, as shown in Figure 2h–j.
Figure 3 shows the SEM micrographs of the samples before and after the ECAP process. There were two phenomena that changed the appearance of the intermetallics: fragmentation and solution of the bulk eutectic structure, and the desolution of fine precipitation particles. In general, the appearance of the intermetallics was controlled by the deformation amount and pressing temperature during ECAP processing. In the microstructure of as-extruded Mg-6Zn alloy, there were some bulk eutectic structure and a significant amount of fine particles around the eutectic structure, as shown in Figure 3a. At 160 °C, the ECAP processing not only caused eutectic deformation, distortion, and elongation, but also induced the precipitation of massive fine particles, as shown in Figure 3b–d. However, when ECAP was performed at the higher temperature of 200 °C, because of the improvement in zinc solubility, the amount of both broken eutectics and precipitates decreased, compared with that of ECAP at 160 °C, as show in Figure 3e–g. When processed at 240 °C, with an increasing number of ECAP passes, these fine precipitates disappeared completely except for the small amount of dissolved broken eutectics. Through observing the enlarged area in the SEM image, we found the edge of these residue dispersive intermetallics were smooth, likely due to the dissolution of broken eutectic during ECAP, as shown in Figure 3h–j.

3.3. Precipitate Behavior

Figure 4 shows the XRD pattern of the as-extruded and ECAP Mg-6Zn alloy. The as-extruded Mg-6Zn alloy showed only the peaks of α-Mg, as shown in Figure 4a. The XRD curve of the ECAP alloy for two passes at 160 °C was similar to that of the as-extruded alloy. However, through slow scanning within a 2θ angle of 40° to 42°, we found several weak diffraction peaks of the MgZn2 phase, as shown in window No. 1 of Figure 4b. The same approach was used to analyze the specimen processed by four passes, as shown in window No. 2 of Figure 4b, in which a diffraction peak located in the 2θ angle near 41° decomposed into several peaks belonging to the MgZn2 phase and Mg4Zn7 phase. Processed by six passes, the intensity of the diffraction peaks of the Mg4Zn7 phase and MgZn2 phase increased sharply, as shown in Figure 4b. When the ECAP temperature was 200 °C or 240 °C, both the Mg4Zn7 and MgZn2 phases were revealed in the XRD pattern, and their diffraction intensity rose with increasing numbers of ECAP passes, as shown in Figure 4c,d. From the SEM images, a large number of precipitates appeared after two passes of ECAP at 160 °C, as shown in Figure 3b–d, which showed weak diffraction peaks due to low crystallinity. With increasing ECAP processing time, the crystallization of the precipitates increased.
The SEM observations and XRD results suggested that ECAP induced the precipitation of Mg4Zn7 and MgZn2. To further study the precipitation behavior of Mg-6Zn alloy during ECAP, TEM, and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) were used to determinate the morphology and structure of the intermetallics. After ECAP processing for six passes at 160 °C, the aggregation of irregularly shaped particles with diameter of 0.5–1 μm was transformed from the broken eutectic structure, around which a large number of fine particles was distributed, as shown in Figure 5a. These fine particles were spherical or ellipsoid in shape and from 10 to 100 nanometers in diameter, as shown in Figure 5b. The irregularly-shaped particles were identified as Mg4Zn7 phase and the finer particles were identified as MgZn2 by indexing the SAED pattern. These fine particles, varying in size, were located in grains and along grain boundaries. When processed for six passes at 200 °C, the assembled larger particles became regular and smooth in shape, which were also indexed as the Mg4Zn7 phase by SAED, as shown in Figure 5c. By contrast, the concentration of fine particles distributed in the matrix decreased, as shown in Figure 5d. After six passes of ECAP at 240 °C, the larger Mg4Zn7 particles eventually became spherical, as shown in Figure 5e, whereas the finer MgZn2 particles became increasingly sparse, as shown in Figure 5f. The Mg4Zn7 particles were 0.5–1 μm in diameter and MgZn2 particles were about 100 nm.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of ECAP on the Mechanical Properties of Mg-6Zn Alloy

The results of the room temperature tensile test showed that the strengths could not be continuously improved by increasing deformation. At 160 °C, in the beginning of ECAP deformation, the refinement of the microstructure and the formation of massive precipitates caused strengths to increase. However, there was no obvious change in microstructure when further plastic deformation was performed (as shown in Figure 2c,d), which could explain why the strengths roughly remained unchanged in the subsequent ECAP deformation. At above 200 °C, the strengths increased first and then fell with increasing ECAP passes. By comparing the microstructure and XRD patterns, we found that the diffraction peaks intensity of the precipitates increased and the precipitate particles grew in the alloy that underwent ECAP at 200 °C and 240 °C. At 200 °C, the precipitation induced by SPD accompanied by the refinement of grains improved the strength. Then, the fine precipitates either grew or dissolved in the matrix but the coarse particles were reserved in subsequent deformation under the Ostwald ripening effect, which reduced strengthening of the precipitation [16,17]. At the higher temperature of 240 °C, the decreasing strengths were attributed to the obvious dissolution of precipitates and grain growth, although the grains were also refined after ECAP. Yuan et al. [18] studied the effect of heat treatment and deformation temperature on the mechanical properties of ECAP ZK60 alloy, and found that the strength increased with reducing ECAP processing temperature. The authors attributed it to precipitation hardening since more fine metastable MgZn2 phase precipitated at lower temperatures.
Besides grain size and precipitates, texture plays an important role on the mechanical properties. Due to texture softening, AZ31B alloy after ECAP via route BC at 200 °C exhibited a lower strength than the un-ECAP specimen [19]. The strength of ZK60 alloy decreased after four passes of ECAP at 240 °C compared to the as-received alloy, which was also attributed to texture softening [20]. In the present study, the strength of the sample after four passes of ECAP processing at both 200 °C and 240 °C was lower than the as-extruded sample, suggesting that texture softening played an important role. However, the strength of the sample after four passes of ECAP processing at 160 °C increased, although texture softening still occurred, which may be related to precipitation hardening resulting from more fine precipitates. Thus, the mechanical properties of the ECAP Mg-6Zn alloy was determined by a combination of grain refinement strengthening, precipitation hardening, and texture softening. Further study is needed to clarify their effect at different temperatures.

4.2. Formation Mechanism of Inhomogeneous Grain Structure in Mg-6Zn Alloy during ECAP

The experimental results indicated that the fine grains of the bi-modal grain structure mixed with a significant amount of fine precipitates distributed near the eutectic structure. Since a number of precipitates produced in the process of ECAP depend on the solute concentration in the local region and deformation temperature, which determined the saturated solubility of zinc and precipitation nucleation rate. The precipitates chiefly concentrated near the eutectic structure, which was also the zinc-rich region, or the supersaturated solid solution. In addition, these fine particles acted as strong obstacles to the dislocation movement and increased the dislocation density in the subsequent deformation process. Conversely, the dislocations and grain boundary could be not only the nucleation sites for the secondary phase but also for the diffusion channels for solute atoms during precipitation. The fine grains among the bi-modal grain structure formed and remained stable under the combination of dynamic recrystallization and the pinning effect of the fine precipitates on grain boundary. However, the coarse grains primarily formed in the zinc-poor region away from the eutectic structure due to the absence of precipitates. In a previous study, the bi-modal or multi-modal grain structure in the single-phase microstructure was due to the dynamic recrystallization under inhomogeneous deformation, which could transform into a homogeneous grain structure with increasing strain [15,21]. In this work, the inhomogeneous grain structure remained after six passes ECAP at 160 °C and 200 °C, as shown in Figure 2d and Figure 2g, respectively. However, there was no appearance of a bi-modal grain structure in the microstructure of the sample processed at 240 °C, as shown in Figure 2j. Thus, unlike the single-phase microstructure, the essential reason for the formation of the bi-modal grain structure containing fine precipitation with inhomogeneous precipitate distribution was further attributed to the inhomogeneous distribution of the solute.

4.3. Precipitation Behavior of the Intermetallic Phase in the Mg-6Zn during ECAP

In previous reports, the Mg7Zn3(Mg51Zn20) phase in the eutectic structure transformed into MgZn2 phase or Mg4Zn7 phase during SPD [10,11,14]. In addition, the rod-like and plate-like precipitates formed by aging treatment in many Mg-Zn based alloys were determined to be either Mg4Zn7 phase, MgZn2 phase, or both [22,23,24,25,26,27]. These experimental phenomena revealed that the source of MgZn2 phase or Mg4Zn7 phase was not unique. Xie et al. [28] investigated the stability and elastic properties of MgZn2 and Mg4Zn7 using first-principles calculations and they found that the relative stability of MgZn2 and Mg4Zn7 was dependent on their composition and temperature. In this study, after processing by ECAP at 160 °C, the MgZn2 phase was the main new phase after two passes, whereas the Mg4Zn7 phase appeared after four passes of ECAP. With ECAP processing at 160 °C, the precipitation of MgZn2 reduced the zinc concentration in the matrix and then promoted the formation of the Mg4Zn7 phase with a lower Zn/Mg formation ratio in subsequent deformation. At higher temperatures, the precipitation and phase transformation accelerated and the two intermetallic compounds formed quickly. In summary, the diversity of precipitates in Mg-Zn-based alloys is the result of the heterogeneity of the microstructure and the variability of the solute concentration.

5. Conclusions

The mechanical properties and microstructure evolution of the Mg-6 wt % Zn alloy during multi-pass ECAP at temperatures of 160 °C, 200 °C, and 240 °C were systematically investigated. The main conclusions are summarized as follows:
(1)
ECAP was effective for grain refinement in Mg-6Zn alloy. A bi-modal grain structure formed at low temperatures, which was stable during ECAP at 160 °C and 200 °C.
(2)
MgZn2 phase and Mg4Zn7 phase were generated from the Mg-6Zn alloy during the ECAP process.
(3)
The mechanical properties increased after two passes of ECAP. During further deformation, the strengths nearly remained constant when processed at 160 °C but decreased when processed at 200 °C and 240 °C.
(4)
The mechanical properties of the ECAP Mg-6Zn alloy was determined by a combination of grain refinement strengthening, precipitation hardening, and texture softening.

Author Contributions

J.Y. and K.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; Z.Q. and K.Y. performed the experiments; J.Y. analyzed the data; J.Y. and K.Y. wrote the paper. All authors have discussed the results, read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by [the national natural science foundation of China] grant number [51501039] and [51301151] and by [the natural science foundation of Jiangsu province] grant number [BK20151411] and [BK20160869].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zheng, Y.F.; Gu, X.N.; Witte, F. Biodegradable Metals. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2014, 77, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Manivasagam, G.; Suwas, S. Biodegradable Mg and Mg Based Alloys for Biomedical Implants. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Y.; Yan, J.; Wang, Z.; Yu, S.; Wang, X.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, C.; Zheng, Q. In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of Mg-6Zn alloys in the bile. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2014, 42, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jang, Y.; Tan, Z.; Jurey, Z.; Xu, Z.; Dong, Z.; Collins, B.; Yun, Y.; Sankar, J. Understanding corrosion behavior of Mg-Zn-Ca alloys from subcutaneous mouse model: Effect of Zn element concentration and plasma electrolytic oxidation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 48, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Langdon, T.G. Twenty-five years of ultrafine-grained materials: Achieving exceptional properties through grain refinement. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 7035–7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, A.B.; Jiang, J.H.; Saito, N.; Shigematsu, I.; Yuan, Y.C. Improving both strength and ductility of a Mg alloy through a large number of ECAP passes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 513–514, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, C.; Furukawa, M.; Horita, Z.; Langdon, T.G. The evolution of homogeneity and grain refinement during equal-channel angular pressing: A model for grain refinement in ECAP. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 398, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, H.K.; Huang, J.C.; Langdon, T.G. Relationship between texture and low temperature superplasticity in an extruded AZ31 Mg alloy processed by ECAP. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 402, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Figueiredo, R.B.; Langdon, T.G. Principles of grain refinement and superplastic flow in magnesium alloys processed by ECAP. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 501, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, Y.W.; Han, E.H.; Shan, D.Y.; Yim, C.D.; You, B.S. The effect of Zn concentration on the corrosion behavior of Mg–xZn alloys. Corros. Sci. 2012, 60, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, J.H.; Guan, S.K.; Ren, Z.W.; Sun, Y.F.; Zhu, S.J.; Wang, B. Homogeneous corrosion of high pressure torsion treated Mg–Zn–Ca alloy in simulated body fluid. Mater. Lett. 2011, 60, 691–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ying, T.; Zheng, M.Y.; Li, Z.T.; Qiao, X.G.; Xu, S.W. Thermal conductivity of as-cast and as-extruded binary Mg–Zn alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 621, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tong, L.B.; Zheng, M.Y.; Hu, X.S.; Wu, K.; Xu, S.W.; Kamado, S.; Kojima, Y. Influence of ECAP routes on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–Zn–Ca alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 4250–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, K.; Sun, Y.S.; Bai, J.; Xue, F. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZA62 Mg alloy by equal-channel angular pressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 1149–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Figueiredo, R.B.; Langdon, T.G. Grain refinement and mechanical behavior of a magnesium alloy processed by ECAP. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 4827–4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Z.D.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.B.; Shu, D.Y. Effect of predeformation on semi-solid microstructure of ZK60+RE magnesium alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2009, 19, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, S.J.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, Z.D. An investigation of microstructure evolution of RAP processed ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 501, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yuan, Y.C.; Ma, A.B.; Gou, X.F.; Jiang, J.H.; Arhin, G.; Song, D.; Liu, H. Effect of heat treatment and deformation temperature on the mechanical properties of ECAP processed ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 677, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ding, S.X.; Lee, W.T.; Chang, C.P.; Chang, L.W.; Kao, P.W. Improvement of strength of magnesium alloy processed by equal channel angular extrusion. Scr. Mater. 2008, 59, 1006–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, Y.B.; Pan, Q.L.; Qin, Y.J.; Liu, X.Y.; Li, W.B.; Chiu, Y.L.; Chen, J.J. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZK60 alloy processed by two-step equal channel angular pressing. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 492, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Valle, J.A.; Ruano, O.A. Superplasticity in a magnesium alloy prepared with bimodal grain size distributions developed by dynamic recrystallisation. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 3391–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mendis, C.L.; Oh-ishi, K.; Kawamura, Y.; Honma, T.; Kamado, S.; Hono, K. Precipitation-Hardenable Mg–2.4 Zn–0.1 Ag–0.1 Ca–0.16 Zr (at.%) Wrought Magnesium Alloy. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mendis, C.L.; Oh-ishi, K.; Hono, K. Enhanced age hardening in a Mg–2.4 at.% Zn alloy by trace additions of Ag and Ca. Scr. Mater. 2007, 57, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, X.; Nie, J.F. Characterization of strengthening precipitate phases in a Mg–Zn alloy. Scr. Mater. 2007, 56, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gao, X.; Nie, J.F. Structure and thermal stability of primary intermetallic particles in an Mg–Zn casting alloy. Scr. Mater. 2007, 57, 655–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, A.; Tsai, A.P. Structural characteristics of β1′ precipitates in Mg–Zn-based alloys. Scr. Mater. 2007, 57, 941–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wei, L.Y.; Dunlop, G.L.; Westengen, H. The intergranular microstructure of cast Mg-Zn and Mg-Zn-rare earth alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1995, 26A, 1947–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, Y.P.; Wang, Z.Y.; Hou, Z.F. The phase stability and elastic properties of MgZn2 and Mg4Zn7 in Mg–Zn alloys. Scr. Mater. 2013, 68, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanical properties of Mg-6Zn alloys before and after equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) processing: (a) yield strength, (b) ultimate tensile strength and (c) elongation.
Figure 1. Mechanical properties of Mg-6Zn alloys before and after equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) processing: (a) yield strength, (b) ultimate tensile strength and (c) elongation.
Metals 08 00841 g001
Figure 2. Optical micrographs of Mg-6Zn alloys: (a) as-extruded, and ECAP for (b) two passes at 160 °C, (c) four passes at 160 °C, (d) six passes at 160 °C, (e) two passes at 200 °C, (f) four passes at 200 °C, (g) six passes at 200 °C, (h) two passes at 240 °C, (i) four passes at 240 °C, and (j) six passes at 240 °C.
Figure 2. Optical micrographs of Mg-6Zn alloys: (a) as-extruded, and ECAP for (b) two passes at 160 °C, (c) four passes at 160 °C, (d) six passes at 160 °C, (e) two passes at 200 °C, (f) four passes at 200 °C, (g) six passes at 200 °C, (h) two passes at 240 °C, (i) four passes at 240 °C, and (j) six passes at 240 °C.
Metals 08 00841 g002aMetals 08 00841 g002b
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of Mg-6Zn alloys: (a) as-extruded, and after undergoing ECAP for (b) two passes at 160 °C, (c) four passes at 160 °C, (d) six passes at 160 °C, (e) two passes at 200 °C, (f) four passes at 200 °C, (g) six passes at 200 °C, (h) two passes at 240 °C, (i) four passes at 240 °C, and (j) six passes at 240 °C.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of Mg-6Zn alloys: (a) as-extruded, and after undergoing ECAP for (b) two passes at 160 °C, (c) four passes at 160 °C, (d) six passes at 160 °C, (e) two passes at 200 °C, (f) four passes at 200 °C, (g) six passes at 200 °C, (h) two passes at 240 °C, (i) four passes at 240 °C, and (j) six passes at 240 °C.
Metals 08 00841 g003aMetals 08 00841 g003b
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Mg-6Zn: (a) as-extruded, and ECAP at (b) 160 °C, (c) 200 °C, and (d) 240 °C.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Mg-6Zn: (a) as-extruded, and ECAP at (b) 160 °C, (c) 200 °C, and (d) 240 °C.
Metals 08 00841 g004
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of Mg-6Zn alloy processed by ECAP for six passes (a,b) at 160 °C, (c,d) at 200 °C, and (e,f) at 240 °C.
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of Mg-6Zn alloy processed by ECAP for six passes (a,b) at 160 °C, (c,d) at 200 °C, and (e,f) at 240 °C.
Metals 08 00841 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, J.; Qin, Z.; Yan, K. Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Evolution of Mg-6 wt % Zn Alloy during Equal-Channel Angular Pressing. Metals 2018, 8, 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100841

AMA Style

Yan J, Qin Z, Yan K. Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Evolution of Mg-6 wt % Zn Alloy during Equal-Channel Angular Pressing. Metals. 2018; 8(10):841. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Jingli, Zijun Qin, and Kai Yan. 2018. "Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Evolution of Mg-6 wt % Zn Alloy during Equal-Channel Angular Pressing" Metals 8, no. 10: 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop