Next Article in Journal
Microstructure Evolution in Homogenization Heat Treatment of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Vacuum Brazing of 6061 Aluminum Using Al-Si-Ge Filler Metals with Different Si Contents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Kinetics of Carbothermic Reduction of Stainless Steel Dust by Walnut Shell Biochar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Selective Oxygen Pressure Leaching for Zinc Extraction from Hemimorphite in Acid-Free Solutions

1
School of Metallurgy and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650106, China
2
Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for New Processes of Ironmaking and Steel Making, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
3
Yunnan Academy of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Kunming 650100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2025, 15(8), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080858 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 May 2025 / Revised: 24 June 2025 / Accepted: 24 July 2025 / Published: 31 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Separation, Reduction, and Metal Recovery in Slag Metallurgy)

Abstract

A novel acid-free oxygen pressure leaching for the extraction of zinc from hemimorphite was proposed in this study. Green vitriol (FeSO4·7H2O), as one of the important industrial by-products, was used as the leaching reagent to separate zinc from silicon and iron. The effect of leaching conditions, including Fe/Zn molar ratio, leaching temperature, pressure, and reaction time, on the leaching efficiency of zinc, Fe, and Si was investigated systematically. The results showed that the molar ratio of Fe/Zn and leaching temperature play a pivotal role in determining the leaching efficiency rate of Zn. Under the optimized leaching conditions (Fe/Zn molar ratio = 6:1, 150 °C, 1.8 × 106 Pa, and leaching time of 2 h), the leaching efficiency of Zn reached 98.80% and the leaching efficiencies of Fe and Si were 0.76% and 16.80%, respectively. In addition, the shrinking core model was established to represent the relationship between the rate control step and the leaching conditions. The leaching process was controlled by chemical reaction and diffusion, and the activation energy of the leaching process is 97.14 kJ/mol.

1. Introduction

Zinc (Zn) is thought to be one of the pivotal non-ferrous metals. Due to the effective separation of sulfides from gangue by conventional flotation techniques, it is predominantly derived from zinc sulfide ores [1,2]. However, the accelerated consumption of zinc has led to a rapid depletion of zinc sulfide ores. This burgeoning interest is propelled not only by the diminishing availability of zinc sulfide ores but also by escalating restrictions on sulfur emissions [3,4].
Hemimorphite, which accounts for approximately 30% of the oxidized ore, is the main mineral component of zinc oxide ore with commercial value [3]. At present, pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy have been extensively studied to treat these ores [2,4,5,6]. Compared with pyrometallurgical processes, hydrometallurgy has more economic efficiency. In practice, there are various acid or alkaline leaching lixiviants used in hydrometallurgical processes [7,8,9,10]. Sulfuric acid is the most versatile leaching agent used for leaching high-grade zinc oxide ore [11,12]. However, impurities such as iron can be significantly dissolved [5,13]. Thus, researchers proposed some processes of leaching with an alkaline solution. In practice, the dissolution of SiO2 in an alkaline solution will increase the load of leachate purification. Moreover, SiO2 dissolved from hemimorphite would consume too much of the alkaline leaching reagent [14,15,16]. Rao et al. [17] employed iminodiacetic acid for the leaching of hemimorphite, achieving a zinc leaching rate of 88.15%. Meanwhile, iminodiacetic acid can be reused by adding dilute sulfuric acid, underscoring the environmentally sustainable nature of this method. The recovery of zinc in hemimorphite reached 97.15% by trichloroacetic acid (TCAA) leaching [18]. The utilization of organic acids as leaching reagents not only maintained the leaching solution at a low acidity level but also mitigated the risk of environmental contamination by waste acids. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that the costs associated with organic acids for zinc leaching surpass those of inorganic acids. Therefore, it is considered imperative to explore an environmentally friendly leaching reagent with excellent selectivity and lower costs for the zinc leaching from hemimorphite.
Due to the acid leaching process, acidic waste will be produced; environmentally friendly leaching processes should be developed. Given the notable hydrolytic capabilities exhibited by Fe3+ or Fe2+ ions, an appropriate acidic environment can be maintained by controlling the hydrolytic degree. The acidic environment engendered through the hydrolysis of ferric ions serves to curtail acid consumption and alleviate the burden on waste acid treatment. In the industrial production process, plenty of by-products containing acidic iron are produced, which can be applied to leach hemimorphite. Babu, M.N. et al. [19] investigated the oxidative leaching of zinc from sphalerite concentrate using ammonium, sodium, and potassium persulfates in a sulfuric acid medium. Under optimized conditions (333 K, 5% (v/v) H2SO4, and 20% (w/v) ammonium persulfate (APS)), 95% of zinc was extracted from the −150 μm concentrate within 5 h. Souza, A.D. et al. [20] investigated the dissolution kinetics of iron-rich zinc sulfide concentrate in acidic ferric sulfate media, revealing a distinct two-stage leaching mechanism: an initial surface chemical reaction-controlled stage followed by a subsequent diffusion-controlled stage through elemental sulfur layers. At present, acidic ferric salts such as ferric chloride and ferric sulfate have been used as inorganic lixiviants for leaching sphalerite [21,22,23,24,25]. It is widely acknowledged that the erosion of the sphalerite by ferric sulfate plays a crucial role in the whole process [26]. The reactivity of sphalerite is contingent upon its iron content in the solution; a higher iron concentration renders the sphalerite lattice more susceptible to opening [27]. It is due to the ferric iron having a high oxidation potential of 0.77 V, which can serve as an oxidant during the sphalerite leaching process. However, if the acidic ferric salts are used to treat hemimorphite, the zinc leaching mainly depends on the hydrogen ions generated by the dissociation of water molecules. In this context, iron ions act as a hydrolytic agent to produce an acidic solution.
To verify the viability of employing acidic ferric salts as an environmentally friendly leaching agent for hemimorphite treatment, the industrial by-product Green vitriol (FeSO4·H2O) was used to leach zinc from hemimorphite by the oxidative pressure leaching method. Herein, the parameters of the ferrous sulfate-to-hemimorphite mass ratio, leaching temperature, leaching duration, and reaction pressure were investigated to assess their effects on the leaching efficiency of Zn. The leaching efficiency of Fe and Si was also measured to evaluate the potential for the separation of iron and zinc. In addition, a kinetic model was established, which is beneficial to interpret the reaction mechanism and provide a theoretical basis.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Procedure

The mineral hemimorphite concentrate was obtained from Yunnan Province, China. The chemical composition analysis results of the ore samples, as determined by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, Rigaku, Japan), were presented in Table 1. The mineral phase of hemimorphite was identified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Rigaku). The microstructure and element distribution of the sample were identified by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS, Apreo S HiVac, USA). The XRD pattern was shown in Figure 1a, revealing hemimorphite as the predominant mineral phase, accompanied by cordierite (Mg2Al4Si5O18), quartz (SiO2), and hematite (Fe2O3) identified as principal gangue components. As shown in Figure 1b, the size distribution of hemimorphite particles was measured by a laser particle size analyzer (LPS; Malvern MasterSizer2000, UK). It is indicated that the size of the particles ranged from 1.290 μm to 40.306 μm (d10–d90). The measured value of the mean diameter of the ore powder (dm) was 5.012 μm, while the median diameter of the ore powder (d50) is 6.148 μm. The SEM-EDS analysis displayed in Figure 1c indicated that the hemimorphite ore exhibited an irregular morphology with particle sizes ranging approximately from 5 to 20 μm. EDS analysis revealed that Zn was predominantly enriched together with Si and O, suggesting that the main mineral phase present was hemimorphite. Additionally, the co-enrichment of Mg, Al, Si, and O indicated the presence of cordierite as the main impurity phase. These observations were fully consistent with the results obtained from both PSD analysis and XRD pattern, thereby corroborating the mineralogical composition and phase identification of the sample. The leaching reagent ferrous sulfate (FeSO4·7H2O) used in the experiment was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
The experimental equipment is shown in Figure 2. Oxygen was pumped into the leaching solution through a dedicated tube, with pressure regulated by a pressure valve. The temperature of the solution was set by a platinum resistance thermometer with an accuracy of ±0.1 °C. For each experiment, 10 g of finely ground hemimorphite powder and a certain amount of FeSO4·7H2O (mass calculated according to the Fe/Zn molar ratio was 3.2, 3.6, 4.0, 4.8, and 6.0) were added into the reactor with 100 mL of distilled water. Subsequently, the sealed reactor was heated to the presupposed temperature and stirred at 500 rpm. When the temperature was reached, the oxygen was bubbled into the reactor with controlled oxygen partial pressure and leaching for the required period. After the experiment, the reactor was cooled by water to collect the slurry. The leachate and the leaching residue were separated by filtration (S/L) separation. The leaching residue obtained from the separation process was oven-dried for further analysis. The content of Zn, Fe, and Si leached in solution was detected by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) [28] or inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) methods.

2.2. Analysis and Characterization

The concentration of zinc in the leachate was detected by the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) titration method with methyl orange as the indicator [28]. The concentrations of Si and Fe in the leach solutions were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, Optima 5300 DV, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The leaching efficiency of zinc and the leaching efficiency of Fe or Si in the leachate can be obtained as follows:
η = CZn × V/MZn × 100%
λi = Ci × V/Mi × 100%
where CZn is the concentration of Zn in the leachate (g·L−1), Ci is the concentration of Fe or Si, V is the volume of the leachate (L), MZn is the weight of Zn in the ground hemimorphite powders added in the reactor (g) as determined by EDTA method, and Mi is the content of Si in the ore powders or the total amount of Fe existing in the ore powder plus the FeSO4·7H2O added in the reactor (g).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Feasibility Assessment

Due to the experiment being conducted in a sealed reactor, real-time monitoring of pH during the reaction was unfeasible. Therefore, pH measurements were conducted only at the initial stage (pH = 3.3) and the termination point (pH = 1.1) of the reaction. To further explore the thermodynamic behavior of hemimorphite treated with ferrous sulfate, the E-pH diagram of the Fe-S-H2O system was analyzed. This thermodynamic analysis can not only systematically explain the reaction mechanisms under different conditions but also provide a theoretical basis for determining the optimal leaching parameters, thereby ensuring efficient zinc extraction. Figure 3 shows the potential E-pH diagram of the Fe-S-H2O system. In the low-potential region (E < −0.5 V), iron was stable as Fe, and sulfur was predominantly in the form of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). In the moderate-potential region (−0.5 V < E < 0 V), iron formed FeS2 and FeS. In the high-potential region (E > 0 V), iron corroded to form Fe2+ or Fe2O3, and sulfur was present as HSO4. In this region, Fe2+ changed to Fe2O3 as the potential increased [29].
During the oxygen pressure leaching process, the primary reactions conducted can be expressed as the following equations. Firstly, FeSO4·7H2O dissolved in distilled water and dissociated into Fe2+ and SO42− (Equation (4)). Meanwhile, a portion of Fe2+ underwent oxidation either by dissolved O2 (aq) (Equation (3)) in the solution or by pumped O2 (g) bubbles (Equation (5)), converting into Fe3+. Subsequently, according to Figure 3, Equations (6) and (7) were achievable under experimental conditions. The generated Fe3+ was further hydrolyzed in water and produced a significant quantity of H+ ions and Fe2O3 (Equations (6) and (7)). The resultant H+ ions contributed to the development of pronounced acidity in the leachate, which was beneficial for the zinc in hemimorphite to leach in lixivium (Equation (8)). Meanwhile, zinc can be separated from silicon simultaneously due to the silica in silicate ores being dissolved first and then agglomerated into colloidal silica by adjusting the pH value to 4–5.5 [2]. Therefore, zinc can be extracted from hemimorphite using Green vitriol as a selective leaching reagent. The entire complex process was aptly elucidated through the reaction Equation (9). It should be noted that there are some secondary reactions conducted in the intricate leaching process, which would generate some by-products as shown in Equations (10) and (11). Compared with the general acid leaching, the FeSO4·7H2O leaching process was more economical and environmentally friendly.
O2(g) = O2(aq) (3)
FeSO4·7H2O = Fe2+ + SO42− + 7H2O (4)
4Fe2+ + O2(g) + 4H+ = 4Fe3+ + 2H2OΔrGmθ = 0.25944T − 401.301 kJ/mol(5)
2Fe3+ + 3H2O = Fe2O3 + 6H+ΔrGmθ = −0.0514T − 180.617 kJ/mol(6)
4Fe2+ + 4H2O + O2(g) = 2Fe2O3 + 8H+ΔrGmθ = 0.15664T − 762.534 kJ/mol(7)
Zn4(Si2O7)(OH)2 + 8H+ = 4Zn2+ + 2H4SiO4 + H2OΔrGmθ = 0.044T − 363.78 kJ/mol(8)
4Fe2+ + O2(g) + Zn4(Si2O7)(OH)2 = 4Zn2+ + 2SiO2 + H2O + 2Fe2O3ΔrGmθ = 0.158T − 1116.70 kJ/mol(9)
H4SiO4 = 2H2O + SiO2ΔrGmθ = 4.811 − 0.0232T kJ/mol(10)
M2SO4 + 3Fe2(SO4)3 + 12H2O = 2MFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 + 6H2SO4 (M = K,Na) (11)

3.2. Effect of the Fe/Zn Molar Ratio

Due to the acidity of the solution being mainly determined by the hydrolysis of FeSO4·7H2O, the content of FeSO4·7H2O was very critical for the Zn leaching process. According to Equations (6)–(8), the leaching process was performed at 150 °C for 2 h with leaching pressure at 1.5 MPa. The influence of the Fe/Zn molar ratio on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si was illustrated in Figure 4. The leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si was calculated according to Equations (1) and (2). The leaching efficiency of Zn increased from 71.29% to 94.8% as the Fe/Zn molar ratio elevated from 3.2 to 4.0. Beyond this point, a plateau was discerned, signifying that despite the Fe/Zn molar ratio further increasing from 4.0 to 4.8, the leaching efficiency of Zn stabilized. This phenomenon arose from the fact that the concentration of H+ generated through the hydrolysis of Fe2+ or Fe3+ became insufficient to facilitate the decomposition of the hemimorphite concentrate. With the increase in the Fe/Zn molar ratios, a greater participation of Fe2+ or Fe3+ in the hydrolysis reaction occurred, thereby fostering the production of H+. It is beneficial for the leaching of Zn from hemimorphite concentrate particles. Meanwhile, the decomposition of hemimorphite would liberate zinc and silica simultaneously, leading to the formation of silica gel, which would wrap the concentrate particles and prevent the decomposition from continuing. Whereas, it should be noted that the leaching efficiency of Si remarkably increased when the Fe/Zn molar ratio increased from 4.0 to 4.8. It can be attributed to the bonding of silica gel, which may be broken to release monomeric silica in a strong acidic solution. In addition, the leaching efficiency of iron exhibited a discernible increase, particularly notable at a Fe/Zn molar ratio of 6. A possible explanation for this observation lies in the fact that the hydrolysis reaction could not be conducted continuously when most of the hemimorphite had decomposed. It led to excessive FeSO4·7H2O dissolved in solution and the leaching efficiency of Fe increased.
The leaching residues were characterized via XRD which is shown in Figure 5. The main mineral phases in the leaching residues were hematite and jarosite. Moreover, there are discernible diffraction peaks corresponding to unreacted hemimorphite (Zn4Si2O7(OH)2), cordierite (Mg2Al4Si5O18), and formed SiO2. With the increase in the Fe/Zn molar ratio, the intensity of the diffraction peaks corresponding to hemimorphite decreased, indicating that the decomposition of hemimorphite increased as the Fe/Zn molar ratio rose. It can be attributed to the oxidation and hydrolysis of Fe2+ would generate H+, which can largely improve the acidity of the solution and promote the decomposition of hemimorphite. Meanwhile, the intensity of hematite increased correspondingly, indicating that most of the Green vitriol (FeSO4·7H2O) was converted into hematite simultaneously with the help of the dissolution of hemimorphite (Equation (9)), which is consistent with Figure 5.

3.3. Effect of the Leaching Temperature

To investigate the effect of temperature on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si, the experiments at different temperatures were conducted at 1.5 MPa for 2 h with a Fe/Zn molar ratio of 6. The results were shown in Figure 6, it was indicate that the leaching efficiency of Zn increased obviously from 94.80% to 95.58% when the leaching temperature ranged from 120 °C to 150 °C. It may be due to the high temperature being conducive to the hydrolysis of Green vitriol, resulting in an increased generation of H+. However, the leaching efficiency of Zn decreased slightly above 150 °C. The reason was that the crystallization of FeSO4·7H2O occurred when the temperature further increased, which inhibited the oxidative hydrolysis of Fe2+ to a certain extent and caused the concentration of H+ in the solution to fluctuate. However, this change was relatively inconspicuous when compared to the variation of leaching efficiency of Fe and Si, which decreased from 2.81% to 1.12% and from 17.57% to 10.19%, respectively. It can be attributed to the high temperature being advantageous for the transformation of jarosite and cordierite into Fe2O3 and SiO2, leading to a noticeable decrease in the leaching efficiency of Fe and Si in the leachate.
The XRD patterns of the leaching residue were depicted in Figure 7. This indicated that Fe was mainly deposited as jarosite and yellow iron oxide at temperatures ranging from 120 °C to 150 °C. However, as the temperature reached 180 °C, the diffraction peak intensity of Fe2O3 increased while the diffraction peaks of jarosite and Fe2O3·H2O gradually weakened. It indicates that these metastable precipitates (jarosite and iron oxide yellow) would convert into stable hematite (Fe2O3) at relatively high leaching temperatures. In addition, the diffraction peak intensity of SiO2 increased correspondingly, suggesting that more gangue cordierite was decomposed into SiO2 with the rising temperature. It is consistent with the change trend shown in Figure 6.

3.4. Effect of the Reaction Pressure

The influence of the reaction pressure on the leaching process of hemimorphite was investigated under leaching conditions at 150 °C for 2 h and a Fe/Zn molar ratio of 6. The leaching efficiency of Zn, as depicted in Figure 8, indicated that almost all the leaching efficiencies exceeded 96%, showing minimal variation under different reaction pressures. However, the leaching efficiency of Fe and Si exhibited a slight increase with the rising reaction pressure. It might be attributed to the fact that the reaction pressure was primarily related to the oxygen partial pressure. The acidity of the solution will improve due to the augmentation of oxygen partial pressure, which will enhance the hydrolytic degree of Fe ions. It is beneficial for the decomposition of formed precipitates such as jarosite and SiO2, leading to the leaching efficiency of Fe and Si increasing slightly.
The XRD patterns of the corresponding leaching residues were displayed in Figure 9. It is indicated that the main precipitates were jarosite, hematite, and SiO2 at comparatively low pressure (1.0–1.5 MPa). As the reaction pressure increased from 1.5 MPa to 2.0 MPa, the diffraction peaks corresponding to jarosite and SiO2 disappeared, while some weak diffraction peaks indexed to yellow iron oxide emerged. It is suggested that the decomposition of jarosite prefers to convert into yellow iron oxide rather than hematite at high reaction pressure.

3.5. Effect of the Leaching Time

The oxygen leaching of hemimorphite was performed at 150 °C with a Fe/Zn molar ratio of 6 and a reaction pressure of 1.5 MPa for different leaching times. The results were depicted in Figure 10. It was observed that the leaching efficiency of Zn and Fe remained stable with the extension of leaching time, ranging from 96.54% to 98.12% and from 0.72% to 1.61%, respectively. However, the leaching efficiency of Si exhibited a noticeable decreasing trend with the extension of leaching time, varying from 33.32% to 10.90%. It might be due to the silicate in gangue dissolving and forming silicic acid in acid solution, which is further converted into SiO2 as the leaching time is extended. In addition, impurity ions such as Mg and Al may react with the dissolved Si to form some undissolved silicate, contributing to the decrease in the leaching efficiency of Si.
The XRD patterns of the leaching residues are presented in Figure 11. It is evident that the primary phases were jarosite and iron oxide yellow at 0.5 h. With the extension of the reaction time beyond 1 h, the diffraction intensity of Fe2O3 enhanced while the diffraction peaks of jarosite and Fe2O3·H2O gradually weakened. It is indicated that these phases will convert into hematite. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that the diffraction peak intensity of SiO2 initially increased with prolonged reaction time, showing an enhancement after 2 h, but subsequently decreased with further extension of leaching time. It is attributed to the fact that during the initial leaching stage (within 2 h), the decomposition of hemimorphite released Si4+, which formed silica gel encapsulating the mineral particle surfaces in the weakly acidic system, leading to increased silicon content in the leach residue. When the leaching time exceeded 2 h, the acidity of the solution intensified, causing the silica gel to gradually dissociate and regenerate Si2+ that returned to the leaching solution.

3.6. Analysis of Leaching Kinetics

Based on the aforementioned analysis, it is known that leaching temperature was the primary factor influencing the dissolution of FeSO4 [24]. To explore the reaction mechanism of FeSO4 leaching of hemimorphite, the influence of reaction temperatures on zinc leaching efficiency as a function of reaction time was investigated under a molar ratio of 6:1. The results were depicted in Figure 12.
The results showed that the reaction temperature exerted a predominant influence on zinc leaching. The leaching efficiency increased with a rise in leaching temperature. For instance, at 135 °C, a 75.21% zinc leaching efficiency was achieved in 30 min, which escalated to 84.85% by increasing the temperature to 180 °C in just 5 min. The effects of temperature on zinc leaching efficiency varied significantly within the first 10 min, while the changes became more gradual beyond this initial period. Hence, it is reasonable to affirm that the majority of zinc leaching occurred within the initial 10 min, emphasizing the significance of the leaching kinetics for zinc during this initial period, which had a crucial impact on the entire process.
Many authors consider that the shrinking core model can explain the heterogeneous kinetics of acidic leaching of most metals [23]. For the solid reactant particles, the chemical reaction was gradually promoted from the outside to the inside, and there is a shrinking core composed of unreacted substances in the ore until the end of the reaction. The product layer was attached to the reactants, and the shape and volume of the product layer were almost the same as that of the raw ore, which can be negligible. Based on the shrinking core model theory, the reaction rate was mainly determined by two aspects: the chemical reaction at the reaction interface (chemical reaction control) and the diffusion of the fluid phase in the boundary layer and product layer (diffusion control).
Figure 13 shows the SEM images of samples obtained after leaching for 2 min at 150 °C under the condition of a molar ratio of 3.2. It is known from Figure 13a that Zn was surrounded by Si and Fe, and the part of the Si and Fe product layer in contact with Zn4(Si2O7)(OH)2 formed the reaction interface. This indicated that hemimorphite was decomposed with the help of an acid solution generated by the hydrolysis of Fe3+ according to Equation (8). Figure 13b shows the variation of the compositions of the main elements in different layers of the obtained samples tested by EDS spectra. It is indicated that the content of Zn gradually increased as the line scanning direction changed to reach a stable state. The content of Si gradually decreased near Zn4(Si2O7)(OH)2. The overall content of Fe was also reduced with some fluctuation. It is due to the hydrolysis of Fe3+ to generate H2SO4 and Fe2O3, and some of the generated Fe2O3 was mixed into H4SiO4. As a result, the Fe content exhibited fluctuations, although they were not as pronounced as the decreasing trend of Si.
Based on the above analysis and in conjunction with the SEM image in Figure 13, it is reasonable to confirm that the leaching process of Zn4(Si2O7)(OH)2 in hemimorphite by FeSO4·7H2O was a typical shrinking core model. The solid products SiO2 and Fe2O3 will gradually wrap around the reactants, and the size of the unreacted Zn4(Si2O7)(OH)2 will gradually decrease.
To further explain the kinetics of the leaching process, the reaction rate constant and apparent activation energy can be obtained by establishing the kinetic equations, which is an essential method to optimize the leaching conditions.
When the reaction rate is restricted by the diffusion of the reagents within the boundary layer or reaction product layer, the zinc leaching efficiency at any time can be described by Equations (12) and (13):
1 − (1 − α)2/3 = k1t
1−2/3α − (1 − α)2/3 = k2t
The zinc leaching efficiency at any time, under a system, is limited by the chemical reaction and can be obtained as Equation (14):
1 − (1 − α)1/3 = k3t
When the regime is constrained by the diffusion and chemical reaction simultaneously, the zinc leaching efficiency at any time can be calculated according to Equation (15):
1/3ln((1 − α)) − [1 − (1 − α)−1/3] = k4t
where α is the zinc recovery (%); t is the reaction time (min); k1, k2, k3, and k4 represent the apparent rate constants (min−1).
Regarding kinetic analysis, various rate-controlling steps within the shrinking core model were estimated. The values of the apparent rate constant (k) and the correlation coefficient (R2) obtained by fitting the unreacted shrinking core model for different control processes (Equations (12)–(15)) are exhibited in Table 2. The results derived from the data presented in Table 2 demonstrated that the leaching kinetics governing the dissolution of hemimorphite conformed to the mixed control model as delineated by Equation (15). The study demonstrated that this rate was determined by both chemical reaction kinetics and reagent diffusion. The rate of this intricate process reflected the reaction order regarding the hydrolysis of Fe3+ and the decomposition of hemimorphite.
The fitting results derived from the application of the mixed control model are shown in Figure 14. It is discernible that the slope of the fitting line (k) experienced an increase with an elevation in temperature. This phenomenon was attributable to the positive correlation between the apparent rate constant, the reaction rate constant, and the diffusion coefficient. Both the reaction rate and diffusion exhibited an upward trend with increasing leaching temperatures.
To determine the activation energy (Ea), the relationship between the apparent rate constant (k) and temperature (T) is calculated according to the Arrhenius formula (Equation (16)) [26], in which the plot of lnk against 1/T forms a straight line with a slope of −Ea/R and the intercept of ln k (Figure 15).
l n k = E a R T + l n A
where k is the apparent rate constant, A is the pre-exponential factor, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the reaction temperature [26].
Thus, the leaching process of Zn from hemimorphite by FeSO4·7H2O conformed to the shrinking core model of mixed control. And the activation energy ( E a ) was 97.14 kJ/mol. The equation elucidating the leaching kinetics of hemimorphite can be expressed as follows:
1/3ln((1 − α)) − [ 1 − (1 − α)−1/3] = 8.965 × 109 e−97142/RT t
This study revealed that the leaching of hemimorphite in ferrous sulfate (FeSO4·7H2O) solution exhibited a high activation energy of 97.14 kJ/mol, significantly exceeding values reported for acidic and alkaline leaching systems [30,31,32]. From a kinetic perspective, such a high activation energy indicated that the dissolution of hemimorphite in ferrous sulfate solution was thermodynamically more challenging. This characteristic may lead to slower Zn extraction rates, potentially affecting overall production efficiency in industrial applications. However, from a sustainability standpoint, the ferrous sulfate leaching system offered distinct advantages. First, it eliminated the need for strong acids commonly used in conventional leaching processes, significantly reducing environmental hazards. Second, ferrous sulfate was an economical and widely available industrial by-product, ensuring cost-effectiveness. Moreover, this approach aligned with the principles of green metallurgy, as it operated under mild conditions with minimal environmental impact. These features made ferrous sulfate leaching a promising method for future zinc leaching efficiency processes.

4. Conclusions

Industrial by-product Green vitriol (FeSO4·7H2O) was used as the leaching reagent; Zn was selectively extracted from hemimorphite in acid-free solution by the oxygen pressure leaching method. The leaching parameters, such as leaching reagent amount, leaching temperature, and reaction pressure of oxygen, exerted a significant influence on the zinc leaching efficiency. The optimum reaction conditions were a Fe/Zn molar ratio of 6:1, 150 °C, 1.8 MPa, and a leaching time of 2 h. In those conditions, the leaching efficiency of Zn reached 98.80% and the leaching efficiencies of Si and Fe were only 0.76% and 16.80%, respectively. Hence, Green vitriol proved to be a viable and economic leaching agent. In addition to the high selective leaching efficiency of Zn, a more important benefit of using Green vitriol to leach hemimorphite is that the leaching process is environmentally protective.
Moreover, the shrinking core model was established to express the relationship between the rate-controlling steps and the leaching conditions. The leaching process was controlled by chemical reaction and diffusion, and the activation energy of the leaching process is 97.14 kJ/mol. This research will present a novel idea and provide a theoretical foundation for the efficient environmental extraction of Zn from other oxidized zinc ores.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and H.N.; Methodology, T.W. and W.M.; Software, Y.Z.; Validation, C.C.; Formal Analysis, Y.Z.; Investigation, C.C.; Data Curation, S.Z.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.Z. and S.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, T.W., Y.Z. and W.M.; Visualization, T.W. and Y.Z.; Supervision, W.M.; Project Administration, Y.L. and H.N.; Funding Acquisition, Y.L. and H.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52374344, U23A20606).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Analytical & Testing Center of Wuhan University of Science and Technology for the help on analysis. We would also like to thank Huiyuan Yang from Yunnan Academy of Ecological and Environmental Sciences for the help on resource and method.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Xing, Y.; Liu, H.; Deng, Z.; Wei, C.; Li, X.; Li, M.; Yang, Y. Dissolution behavior of ferrous sulfate in the hematite process. Hydrometallurgy 2021, 200, 105561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Terry, B.; Monhemius, A.J. Acid dissolution of willemite (Zn, Mn)2 SiO4) and hemimorphite (Zn4Si2O7(OH)2 H2O). Metall. Trans. B 1983, 14, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, T.; Zhang, X. Leaching of hemimorphite in NH3–(NH4)2SO4–H2O system and its mechanism. Hydrometallurgy 2012, 125–126, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiong, L.Z.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, X.; He, Z.; Yin, Z. Preparation of high purity zinc from zinc oxide ore by vacuum carbothermic reduction. Vacuum 2017, 146, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, A.; Li, M.; Qian, Z.; Ma, Y.; Che, J.; Ma, Y. Hemimorphite Ores: A Review of Processing Technologies for Zinc Extraction. JOM 2016, 68, 2688–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaya, M.; Hussaini, S.; Kursunoglu, S. Critical review on secondary zinc resources and their recycling technologies. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 195, 105362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Atia, T.A.; Spooren, J. Microwave assisted chloride leaching of zinc plant residues. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 398, 122814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hussaini, S.; Kursunoglu, S.; Top, S.; Ichlas, Z.T.; Kaya, M. Testing of 17-different leaching agents for the recovery of zinc from a carbonate-type Pb-Zn ore flotation tailing. Miner. Eng. 2021, 168, 106935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kursunoglu, S.; Kursunoglu, N.; Hussaini, S.; Kaya, M. Selection of an appropriate acid type for the recovery of zinc from a flotation tailing by the analytic hierarchy process. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ehsani, I.; Üçyıldız, A.; Obut, A. Leaching behaviour of zinc from a smithsonite ore in sodium hydroxide solutions. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2018, 55, 407–416. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, K.; Zhang, Q.; He, X.; Hu, H.; Liu, Y. Efficient separation of smithsonite and cerussite via mechanical ball milling-triggered selective leaching in the aqueous solution containing Pb chloride or Pb nitrate. Hydrometallurgy 2021, 202, 105589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, H.; Wu, D.; Wang, Z. Investigation of the Leaching Kinetics of Zinc from Smithsonite in Ammonium Citrate Solution. Metals 2024, 14, 105589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yin, Z.; Ding, Z.; Hu, H.; Liu, K.; Chen, Q. Dissolution of zinc silicate (hemimorphite) with ammonia–ammonium chloride solution. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 103, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dou, A.-C.; Yang, T.-Z.; Yang, J.-X.; Wu, J.-H.; Wang, A. Leaching of low grade zinc oxide ores in Ida2−-H2O system. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 2548–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rao, S.; Yang, T.; Zhang, D.; Liu, W.; Chen, L.; Hao, Z.; Xiao, Q.; Wen, J. Leaching of low grade zinc oxide ores in NH4Cl–NH3 solutions with nitrilotriacetic acid as complexing agents. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 158, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, T.; Rao, S.; Zhang, D.; Wen, J.; Liu, W.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X. Leaching of low grade zinc oxide ores in nitrilotriacetic acid solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 161, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rao, S.; Zhang, D.; Yang, T.; Ling, H.; Liu, W.; Chen, L. Recovery of zinc and the regeneration of the complexation agent from the NH4Cl-NH3-NTA system. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Q.; Wen, S.; Wu, D.; Feng, Q.; Li, S. Dissolution kinetics of hemimorphite in trichloroacetic acid solutions. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 1645–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Babu, M.N.; Sahu, K.K.; Pandey, B.D. Zinc recovery from sphalerite concentrate by direct oxidative leaching with ammonium, sodium and potassium persulphates. Hydrometallurgy 2002, 64, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Souza, A.; Pina, P.; Leão, V.; Silva, C.; Siqueira, P. The leaching kinetics of a zinc sulphide concentrate in acid ferric sulphate. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 89, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dutrizac, J.E. The dissolution of sphalerite in ferric sulfate media. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2006, 37, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muravyov, M.; Panyushkina, A. Comparison of sphalerite concentrate leaching by chemical and microbially produced ferric sulfate. Miner. Eng. 2022, 187, 107792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Harahsheh, M.; Kingman, S. The influence of microwaves on the leaching of sphalerite in ferric chloride. Chem. Eng. Process.—Process Intensif. 2007, 46, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, C.; Wei, C.; Xu, H.-S.; Li, M.; Li, X.; Deng, Z.; Fan, G. Oxidative pressure leaching of sphalerite concentrate with high indium and iron content in sulfuric acid medium. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 102, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muravyov, M.; Panyushkina, A. Comparison of sphalerite, djurleite, and chalcopyrite leaching by chemically and biologically generated ferric sulfate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2023, 219, 106067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tian, L.; Yu, X.Q.; Gong, A.; Wu, X.G.; Zhang, T.A.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.F. Kinetic models of zinc dissolution from artificial sphalerite with different iron contents in oxygen pressure leaching. Can. Metall. Q. 2020, 59, 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Crundwell, F.K. The impact of light on the rate and mechanism of dissolution and leaching of natural iron-containing sphalerite, (Zn,Fe)S. Miner. Eng. 2021, 160, 106702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Raba, J.; Fontan, C.A.; Cortinez, V.A. 4-(3,5-Dichloro-2-pyridylazo)-1-3-diaminobenzene-graphite paste electrode for end-point detection in the automatic potentiometric titration of zinc(II) with EDTA. Talanta 1994, 41, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Townsend, H.E. Potential-pH diagrams at elevatedtemperature for the system Fe-H2O. Corros. Sci. 1970, 10, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, A.; Zhao, Z.W.; Jia, X.; Long, S.; Huo, G.; Chen, X. Alkaline leaching Zn and its concomitant metals from refractory hemimorphite zinc oxide ore. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 97, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, H.; Wei, C.; Li, C.X.; Deng, Z.G.; Li, M.T.; Li, X.B. Kinetic Study and Mathematical Model of Hemimorphite Dissolution in Low Sulfuric Acid Solution at High Temperature. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2014, 45, 1622–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ding, Z.; Yin, Z.; Hu, H.; Chen, Q. Dissolution kinetics of zinc silicate (hemimorphite) in ammoniacal solution. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 104, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characterization of ore samples: (a) XRD, (b) particle size distribution, (c) SEM-EDS.
Figure 1. Characterization of ore samples: (a) XRD, (b) particle size distribution, (c) SEM-EDS.
Metals 15 00858 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of the 250 mL Hastelloy autoclave.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of the 250 mL Hastelloy autoclave.
Metals 15 00858 g002
Figure 3. E-pH diagram of Fe-S-H2O system at 200 °C.
Figure 3. E-pH diagram of Fe-S-H2O system at 200 °C.
Metals 15 00858 g003
Figure 4. The influence of Fe/Zn molar ratio on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si.
Figure 4. The influence of Fe/Zn molar ratio on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si.
Metals 15 00858 g004
Figure 5. The XRD patterns of leaching residues obtained at different Fe/Zn molar ratios.
Figure 5. The XRD patterns of leaching residues obtained at different Fe/Zn molar ratios.
Metals 15 00858 g005
Figure 6. The influence of temperature on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si.
Figure 6. The influence of temperature on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si.
Metals 15 00858 g006
Figure 7. The XRD patterns of leaching residues obtained at different temperatures.
Figure 7. The XRD patterns of leaching residues obtained at different temperatures.
Metals 15 00858 g007
Figure 8. The influence of pressure on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si.
Figure 8. The influence of pressure on the leaching efficiency of Zn, Fe, and Si.
Metals 15 00858 g008
Figure 9. The XRD patterns of leaching residues acquired at different pressures.
Figure 9. The XRD patterns of leaching residues acquired at different pressures.
Metals 15 00858 g009
Figure 10. The influence of reaction time on the leaching efficiency of Fe and Si.
Figure 10. The influence of reaction time on the leaching efficiency of Fe and Si.
Metals 15 00858 g010
Figure 11. The XRD patterns of leaching residues obtained at different leaching times.
Figure 11. The XRD patterns of leaching residues obtained at different leaching times.
Metals 15 00858 g011
Figure 12. Leaching efficiency curves of Zn at different temperatures.
Figure 12. Leaching efficiency curves of Zn at different temperatures.
Metals 15 00858 g012
Figure 13. SEM images and distribution mappings of Fe, Si, and Zn (a) EDS surface scanning, (b) EDS line scanning.
Figure 13. SEM images and distribution mappings of Fe, Si, and Zn (a) EDS surface scanning, (b) EDS line scanning.
Metals 15 00858 g013
Figure 14. Plots of representative kinetics models versus initial 10 min reaction time.
Figure 14. Plots of representative kinetics models versus initial 10 min reaction time.
Metals 15 00858 g014
Figure 15. Arrhenius plot between lnk and 1000/T.
Figure 15. Arrhenius plot between lnk and 1000/T.
Metals 15 00858 g015
Table 1. The main chemical composition of hemimorphite.
Table 1. The main chemical composition of hemimorphite.
CompositionsZnOSiMgFeAlCaKLOI *
contents38.2437.378.773.853.773.281.461.052.21
* LOI: Loss of Ignition.
Table 2. Relevant parameters under different kinetic controlling steps.
Table 2. Relevant parameters under different kinetic controlling steps.
Controlling Step1 − (1 − α)2/31 − 2/3α − (1 − α)2/31 − (1 − α)1/31/3ln(1 − α) − [1 − (1 − α)−1/3]
Correlation Coefficient/Rate ConstantR2k1R2k2R2k3R2k4
135 °C0.8190.03250.9390.003320.8370.01820.9570.0026
150 °C0.8200.05620.9640.01070.8650.03540.9930.0137
165 °C0.7140.05920.9170.01300.7790.03900.9950.0208
180 °C0.7650.08080.9680.02660.9010.06810.9950.0526
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, T.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chen, C.; Li, Y.; Ma, W.; Ni, H. A Novel Selective Oxygen Pressure Leaching for Zinc Extraction from Hemimorphite in Acid-Free Solutions. Metals 2025, 15, 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080858

AMA Style

Wang T, Zeng Y, Zhang S, Chen C, Li Y, Ma W, Ni H. A Novel Selective Oxygen Pressure Leaching for Zinc Extraction from Hemimorphite in Acid-Free Solutions. Metals. 2025; 15(8):858. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Tong, Yubo Zeng, Shuang Zhang, Chen Chen, Yang Li, Wenhui Ma, and Hongwei Ni. 2025. "A Novel Selective Oxygen Pressure Leaching for Zinc Extraction from Hemimorphite in Acid-Free Solutions" Metals 15, no. 8: 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080858

APA Style

Wang, T., Zeng, Y., Zhang, S., Chen, C., Li, Y., Ma, W., & Ni, H. (2025). A Novel Selective Oxygen Pressure Leaching for Zinc Extraction from Hemimorphite in Acid-Free Solutions. Metals, 15(8), 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080858

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop