Next Article in Journal
Recent Hydrometallurgical Investigations to Recover Antimony from Wastes
Previous Article in Journal
Metallic Metamaterials for Reducing the Magnetic Signatures of Ships
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Heat Treatment Temperature on the Electrochemical Properties of Cold-Rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe Medium-Manganese Steel

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2025, 15(3), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030275
Submission received: 30 December 2024 / Revised: 18 February 2025 / Accepted: 21 February 2025 / Published: 3 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Corrosion and Protection)

Abstract

The microstructure evolution, polarization curve and impedance of cold-rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel under heat treatment temperatures of 600–800 °C holding 10 min were tested. The results show that the cold-rolled texture of the steel does not completely disappear at 600 °C and 650 °C, exhibiting high charge transfer resistance Rc and corresponding corrosion potential Ecorr. When the heat treatment temperature rises to 700 °C, the texture begins to be eliminated and the Rc begins to decrease, indicating a decrease in corrosion resistance. When the heat treatment temperature rises to 750 °C and 800 °C, it was found that the proportion of austenite begins to increase and the number of grain boundaries decreases, resulting in an increase in Rc and an improvement in the corrosion resistance of the steel. Compared to 6.5 Mn steel, the higher Mn content in 8.5 Mn steel results in better corrosion resistance after high-temperature heat treatment.

1. Introduction

The use of medium-manganese steel in car body manufacturing leads to greater fuel efficiency due to its light weight and excellent mechanical properties. Its dual advantages in cost and performance make it the most promising advanced high-strength steel for the next generation of automobiles [1,2]. In recent years, a large number of scholars have studied the design of medium-manganese steel alloy composition [3], control of rolling process [4] and optimization of heat treatment process [5], achieving a series of important results that have greatly promoted the development of medium-manganese steel [6,7,8]. For instance, Li et al. [9] studied the heat treatment of medium-manganese steel. The results show that the ultimate tensile strength of 1380 MPa and elongation of 39% was obtained after intercritical hardening at 630–650 °C and tempered at 200 °C.
On the other hand, corrosion performance has also become an important consideration in the industrial application of medium-manganese steel [10,11,12]. After production, the car body must undergo anti-corrosion treatment to prevent defects caused by corrosion that could result in a decline in performance. Research has shown that steel is less prone to corrosion when subjected to small deformation, exhibiting strong corrosion resistance. However, as the deformation increases to a large extent, it can lead to a decrease in corrosion resistance [13,14]. Furthermore, studies suggest that the presence of Mn in medium-manganese steel can affect the corrosion rate, which is influenced by other chemical elements. For instance, Su et al. [15] investigated the influence of Mn on the corrosion behavior of medium-manganese steels. The results show that the steels exhibit lower corrosion resistance due to the enrichment of MnFe2O4.
However, there are still very few reports on the electrochemical properties of cold-rolled medium-manganese steel, especially the influence of subsequent heat treatment on the electrochemical properties of cold-rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe. This work discusses the heat treatment of two cold-rolled medium-manganese steels with different Mn contents: 0.2%C–3%Al–6%Mn–Fe (6 Mn) and 0.2%C–3%Al–8.5%Mn–Fe (8.5 Mn). The microstructure evolution of the heat-treated samples was observed. Electrochemical experiments were conducted on the cold-rolled and heat-treated samples to investigate the factors influencing the corrosion performance of medium-manganese steel, providing theoretical guidance for the process design of medium-manganese steel.

2. Materials and Methods

The composition of experimental steels is given in Table 1. The steel ingots were heated at 1200 °C for 2 h in a vacuum induction furnace and then hot-forged into a bar with a cross-sectional size of 100 mm × 30 mm using a Ø450 × 450 two-high reversing hot mill, followed by air-cooling to room temperature. The bar was then soaked at 1200 °C for 2 h followed by 7 passes of hot rolling into a 4 mm-thick strip within a temperature range of 1150–850 °C and air-cooled to room temperature.
After holding the hot-rolled plate at 770–800 °C for 1 h, it was quenched and tempered at 200 °C for 20 min. A 1:3 mixture of hydrochloric acid and water was employed to acid-wash the heat-treated steel plate, followed by cold-rolling using a four-high cold mill with hydraulic tension. After several rolling passes, the thickness was reduced to 1 mm. The cold-rolled samples underwent heat treatment in a furnace, heating to 600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C, respectively, were held for 10 min, and then were subjected to water cooling.
The microstructure was analyzed with the help of a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI NOVA NANOSEM 450). To analyze the austenite content in the figures, the percentage of area occupied by austenite was calculated using ImageJ 1.5.4 software [16] to quantify the amount of austenite.
The electrochemical measurements were carried out at room temperature using an electrochemical work station (PARSTAT 2273) with Pt as the counter electrode, saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode, and the heat-treated samples as the working electrode. For comparative purposes, the as-cold-rolled samples were also tested. A surface area of 1 cm2 for each sample was exposed to an electrolyte solution of 3.5% NaCl. The test started by testing the open circuit potential curve with an experimental time set to 3600 s. The impedance spectra were obtained at the open circuit potentials. The frequency range was from 100,000 to 0.01 Hz with a sinusoidal excitation signal of 10 mV. Polarization curves were measured from −1.1 to −0.1 V at a constant rate of potential change of 10 mV·s−1. Subsequently, EIS Spectrum Analyser 1.0 software was used for fitting analysis of the electrochemical impedance spectra curve to obtain a simulated equivalent circuit diagram.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure Evolution

A type of light-weight medium-manganese steel, 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe has a dual phase (ferrite and austenite). Figure 1 shows the microstructure of 6 Mn steel after different heat treatment temperatures. It can be observed that after heat treatment at 600 °C and 650 °C, the 6 Mn steel still retains a cold-rolled texture.
As the heat treatment temperature increases to 700 °C and 750 °C, the dual phase of the matrix gradually becomes clearer, with the light-colored protrusions being the austenite phase, appearing in fine stripes, and the dark-colored recesses being the ferrite. The results indicate that with a heat treatment temperature of 700 °C, the austenite area percentage is 32.74%, as shown in Figure 1c. At 750 °C, the austenite area percentage is 43.75% (Figure 1d). At 800 °C, the austenite area percentage is highest, reaching 54.81% (Figure 1e). This is because the heat treatment temperature remains within the two-phase region of the iron–carbon phase diagram. When the temperature reaches 800 °C, the amount of austenite gradually increases, changing from a striped to a granular shape, and begins to grow gradually. This is because of austenite stability increased with increasing temperature [17].
Figure 2 shows the microstructure of 8.5 Mn steel after different heat treatments. It can be observed that 8.5 Mn steel still retains the strip texture from cold-rolling at a heat treatment temperature of 600 °C. As the heat treatment temperature increases to above 650 °C, the texture begins to disappear. At 700 °C, the dual phase gradually appears in the matrix. While the temperature reaches 800 °C, the austenite area percentage is 64.54%. A comparison between Figure 2e and Figure 1e reveals that after heat treatment at 800 °C, the proportion of austenite in 8.5 Mn steel is higher than that in 6 Mn steel.

3.2. Electrochemical Analysis

Polarization curve measurements were conducted on samples of cold-rolled and heat-treated metal, with the experimental results shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a shows the polarization curves of 6 Mn steel at different heat treatment temperatures. Compared to the cold-rolled steel, the passivation zones of all anodic polarization curves after heat treatment have become shorter, indicating the absence of a passivation film on the metal surface. Figure 3b depicts the polarization curves of 8.5 Mn steel at different heat treatment temperatures. By extrapolating the polarization curves, the corrosion current density Icorr, the corresponding corrosion potential Ecorr, and the pitting potential Epit can be obtained, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
The parameters from Table 2 and Table 3 indicate that the heat treatment temperature has a certain influence on the Ecorr, Icorr, and Epit. In Table 1, the Ecorr of the cold-rolled 6 Mn steel is −0.82 V. After heat treatment, the Ecorr of the steel begins to decrease. For example, it decreases to −0.89 V at 600 °C and to the lowest value of −0.93 V at 750 °C. According to electrochemical theory, the more negative Ecorr, the greater the material’s corrosion tendency, and the more positive Ecorr, the smaller the corrosion tendency. The above results indicate that the increase in heat treatment temperature weakens the corrosion resistance of the medium-manganese steel. In Table 3, compared with the cold-rolled 8.5 Mn steel, the Ecorr of the 8.5 Mn steel also shows a decreasing trend overall after heat treatment, but it is not significant.
In Table 2, the Icorr of cold-rolled 6 Mn steel is 1.349 × 10−5 A/cm2. After being subjected to a heat treatment at 600 °C, Icorr begins to decrease to 1.0 × 10−5 A/cm2. Subsequently, with an increase in the heat treatment temperature, Icorr starts to rise, but overall, it shows a gradual decrease. It reaches the lowest value of 9.120 × 10−6 A/cm2 at 800 °C. In Table 3, the Icorr of 8.5 Mn steel also shows an overall decreasing trend, reaching the lowest value of 1.445 × 10−5 A/cm2 at 750 °C. Although the cold-rolled 6/8.5 Mn steel has a smaller tendency to corrode, its Icorr is the highest, resulting in a higher corrosion rate. After heat treatment, it is possible to reduce the corrosion rate, which is beneficial for improving the steel’s corrosion resistance.
Furthermore, observing Table 2, it can be noted that with the increase in heat treatment temperature, the Epit of 6 Mn steel reaches its lowest value of −0.70 V at 600 °C, and a relatively higher Epit of −0.64 V at 800 °C. Thermodynamically, this indicates a poorer tendency for pitting at this treatment temperature.
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe medium-manganese steel is shown in Figure 4. It can be observed from the figure that the electrochemical impedance spectra at different heat treatment temperatures all exhibit capacitive arcs. The larger the radius of the capacitive arc, the greater the charge transfer resistance at the metal–solution interface, indicating better corrosion resistance of the metal. With the increase of the heat treatment temperature, the radius of the capacitive arc gradually decreases, reaching the minimum value at 700 °C. When the temperature rises above 750 °C, the radius of the capacitive arc begins to increase again. Therefore, the change trend of the capacitive arc radius indicates that the increase in heat treatment temperature first weakens and then strengthens its corrosion resistance. The corrosion resistance of 6 Mn steel is optimal at 750 °C, while the corrosion resistance of 8.5 Mn steel is optimal at 800 °C.
Figure 5 shows the relationship between the modulus |Z| and frequency (Figure 5a,c), as well as the phase angle and frequency relationship (Figure 5b,d). It can be seen that at high frequencies, the modulus |Z| of 6/8.5 Mn medium-manganese steel is basically the same as that of the heat-treated. In the frequency range of 10−2 Hz to 10 Hz, there are significant fluctuations. The |Z| of 6 Mn steel is larger when annealed at 750 °C, and in the Bode phase diagram, it has only one maximum phase angle (>50°), indicating relatively good corrosion resistance. Similarly, the |Z| of 8.5 Mn steel is larger when heat-treated at 800 °C, and in the Bode phase diagram, its phase angle also has only one maximum value (>50°).
Using the EIS Spectrum Analyser 1.0 software, the Nyquist plots obtained for all samples in 3.5% NaCl solution were fitted and analyzed. Figure 6 is a simplified model that provides a rough estimate of the corrosion mechanism. The physical meanings of the components in the equivalent circuit diagram are as follows: Rs is the solution resistance, Rc is the charge transfer resistance, and the constant phase element (CPE) represents the double-layer capacitance at the electrode surface. P is the parameter for CPE, and n is the exponent of CPE, with a value range between 0.5 and 1. The magnitude of Rc can be used as a standard to measure the difficulty of electrochemical reactions in the corrosion system, making it a crucial parameter for evaluating the corrosion reaction rate of metals in this corrosion system.
From Table 4 and Table 5, it can be seen that the value of index n is between 0.6 and 0.8, indicating that the fitting results of the equivalent circuit are relatively accurate. Deviation from ideality indicates that this electrochemical process is a mixed behavior between ideal resistance and ideal capacitance. As the temperature of heat treatment increases, the value of Rc first decreases and then increases. The value of Rc is much larger than Rs, indicating that the corrosive solution itself has little influence on the electrochemical reaction in the corrosion system, and the corrosion rate is mainly determined by Rc. The Rc value of 6 Mn steel is the highest at a heat treatment temperature of 750 °C, reaching 1041.1 Ω·cm2. The Rc value of 8.5 Mn steel is the highest at a heat treatment temperature of 800 °C, reaching 1073.41 Ω·cm2. This indicates that at higher heat treatment temperatures, the corrosion resistance of the cold-rolled steel can be improved or restored.

4. Discussion

After cold-rolling, steel will form a texture with a higher ability to resist corrosion and a higher Ecorr [18,19,20,21]. After being heat-treated at 600 °C, the texture begins to break down, causing the Ecorr to decrease to −0.89 V (6 Mn) and −0.92 V (8.5 Mn). However, these traces of texture are not completely eliminated when annealed at lower temperatures (600 °C and 650 °C), as seen clearly in Figure 1a,b and Figure 2a,b showing the microstructure in a streaked texture state. As the temperature further increases to 700 °C, the texture disappears and its impact on corrosion begins to decrease, causing the Ecorr to further decrease and the Rc to decrease as well.
When the influence of texture begins to weaken, the influence of grain size and phase becomes apparent. Due to the higher energy of grain boundaries compared to the matrix, grain boundaries can increase diffusion rates, reduce atomic coordination, enhance electron activity, lower surface work function, and increase Rc, making the surface more prone to electron loss or adsorption [22,23]. This can lead to corrosion at the grain boundaries. At heat treatment of 700 °C, the fine grains of medium-manganese steel result in an excessive number of grain boundaries, and the chemical reactivity of these boundaries starts to be released. This leads to the lowest Rc at this temperature among all the samples (see Table 4 and Table 5), causing the Ecorr to decrease and the Icorr to increase, making corrosion easily occur. In Figure 5, both 6 Mn steel and 8.5 Mn steel exhibit the lowest impedance arc radius.
As the heat treatment temperature increases to 750 °C and 800 °C, the material undergoes recovery and recrystallization, causing the grain size to begin increasing and the number of grains to decrease. Previous research results also indicate that with the increase in heat treatment temperature, the grain size of medium-manganese steel begins to increase [24,25], indicating a decrease in the quantity of grain boundaries. A reduced number of grain boundaries is beneficial for the corrosion resistance of the steel. Therefore, at 750 °C and 800 °C, the transfer resistance of 6 Mn and 8.5 Mn steel begins to increase, indicating an improvement in corrosion resistance.
As the temperature of the heat treatment increases, the volume fraction of austenite also begins to increase (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). Research has shown that ferrite is more susceptible to corrosion, while austenite is less prone to corrosion [26,27]. This is also the reason for the continuous increase in the Rc of medium-manganese steel under heat treatment conditions of 750 °C and 800 °C. Due to the increase in austenite content and fewer grains, deformation-induced medium-manganese steel still exhibits good corrosion resistance even in the absence of a textured structure. An increased Mn content contributes to the stability of austenite [28,29]. Furthermore, the increase in Mn also leads to a rise in manganese-containing oxides (such as MnO and Mn2O3) [30], thereby improving the density of the passivation film. Therefore, it can be observed that under the same heat treatment conditions, the Rc of 8.5 Mn steel is significantly higher than that of 6 Mn steel.
In summary, it can be seen that due to changes in the microstructure, several influencing factors (mainly phase, texture, and grain boundaries) interact and restrict each other, resulting in varying degrees of changes in the electrochemical performance. At low temperatures, texture plays a major role, while at high temperatures, grain boundaries and phase are important factors in improving the corrosion resistance of medium-manganese steel.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the electrochemical properties of cold-rolled 6 Mn and 8.5 Mn medium-manganese steels after undergoing heat treatment at different temperatures. With the increase in heat treatment temperature, the Ecorr of both steels generally shows a decreasing trend. The trend of Rc initially decreases and then increases. At 700 °C, the Rc of both 6 Mn and 8.5 Mn decrease to the minimum value and then begin to increase again. At a heat treatment temperature of 750 °C, the Rc of 6 Mn steel reaches a maximum of 1041.1 Ω·cm2, while 8.5 Mn steel reaches a maximum of 1073.41 Ω·cm2 at 800 °C. The change trend is driven by the interplay of texture, phase, and grain boundaries at various stages. Texture plays a significant role during low-temperature heat treatment, leading to a decrease in Rc as it becomes disrupted. In contrast, high-temperature heat treatment eliminates texture entirely, making phase composition the primary factor influencing Rc. Moreover, an increase in the volume fraction of austenite results in a subsequent rise in Rc.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.; methodology, H.Z.; software, J.L.; validation, J.L.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, J.L.; resources, J.L.; data curation, J.L. and H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, J.L.; visualization, J.L. and H.Z.; supervision, J.L.; project administration, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the guidance and experimental assistance provided by Zhichao Li and Lijie Yue and the Yibo Zhao and Yanping Wang from the School of Materials Science and Engineering at Shandong University of Science and Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mohapatra, S.; Poojari, G.; Das, S.; Das, K. Insights into the dynamic impact behavior of intercritically annealed automotive-grade Fe–7Mn–4Al−0.18C steel. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 2023, 887, 145769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leták, R.; Jirková, H.; Kučerová, L.; Jeníček, Š.; Volák, J. Effect of forming and heat treatment parameters on the mechanical properties of medium manganese steel with 5% Mn. Materials 2023, 16, 4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dykas, J.; Samek, L.; Grajcar, A.; Kozłowska, A. Modelling of phase diagrams and continuous cooling transformation diagrams of medium manganese steels. Symmetry 2023, 15, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, T.; Dong, Y.; Qin, D.; Wu, H.; Gao, X.; Du, L. Effect of rolling temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of medium manganese steel. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 2023, 863, 144547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mou, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Misra, D.; He, L.; Li, H. Design of an effective heat treatment involving intercritical hardening for high strength/high elongation of 0.2C–3Al–(6–8.5)Mn–Fe TRIP steels: Microstructural evolution and deformation behavior. Metals 2019, 9, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, Z.; Fu, H. Effect of Si Content on Microstructure and Properties of Low-Carbon Medium-Manganese Steel after Intercritical Heat Treatment. Metals 2024, 14, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Z.; Li, X.; Mou, Y.; Cai, Z.; Misra, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, H. The significance of microstructural evolution on governing impact toughness of Fe–0.2C–6Mn–3Al medium-Mn TRIP steel studied by a novel heat treatment. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 112, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qiao, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, H.; Long, J.; Han, P. Recent progress in microstructural evolution, mechanical and corrosion properties of medium-Mn steel. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2023, 30, 1463–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Mou, Y.; Cai, Z.; Misra, D.; He, L.; Li, H.; Ding, H. Design of an effective heat treatment involving intercritical hardening for high-strength–high elongation of 0.2C–1.5Al–(6–8.5)Mn-Fe TRIP steels: Microstructural evolution and deformation behavior. Mater. Sci. Tech. 2020, 36, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, X.; Kang, S.; Xu, M.; Li, P. Corrosion Product Film of a Medium-Mn Steel Exposed to Simulated Marine Splash Zone Environment. Materials 2021, 14, 5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohapatra, S.; Palai, D.; Satpathy, B.; Das, S.; Das, K. Electrochemical study of intercritically annealed Fe–0.18C–7Mn–4Al steel. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 34, 105282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, G.; Yu, C.; Zheng, H.; Gao, X.; Xie, H.; Huo, M.; Wu, H.; Xu, J.; Du, L.; Jiang, Z. The wet–dry cycling corrosion behavior of low-carbon medium manganese steel exposed to a 3.5% NaCl solution environment. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 31, 7856–7869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choudhary, S.; Nanda, V.; Shekhar, S.; Garg, A.; Mondal, K. Effect of microstructural anisotropy on the electrochemical behavior of rolled mild steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2017, 26, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Zhang, L. Effects of cold deformation on electrochemical corrosion behaviors of 304 stainless steel. Anti-Corros. Methods Mater. 2017, 64, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Su, G.; Gao, X.; Du, L.; Zhang, D.; Hu, J.; Liu, Z. Influence of Mn on the corrosion behaviour of medium manganese steels in a simulated seawater environment. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 9447–9461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bara, M.; Niedźwiedź, M.; Skoneczny, W. Influence of anodizing parameters on surface morphology and surface-free energy of Al2O3 layers produced on EN AW-5251 Alloy. Materials 2019, 12, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Poling, W.A.; Moor, D.E.; Speer, J.G.; Findley, K.O. Temperature effects on tensile deformation behavior of a medium manganese TRIP Steel and a quenched and partitioned steel. Metals 2021, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arafin, M.A.; Szpunar, J.A. A new understanding of intergranular stress corrosion cracking resistance of pipeline steel through grain boundary character and crystallographic texture studies. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.; Lin, N.; Zou, J.; Lin, X.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, S.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Chen, W.; et al. Super-hydrophobicity and corrosion resistance of laser surface textured AISI 304 stainless steel decorated with Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane (HDTMS). Opt. Laser. Technol. 2020, 127, 106146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shkatulyak, N.M.; Tkachuk, O.M. A role played by the crystallographic texture in the process of corrosion of hot-rolled rods made of carbon steel. Mater. Sci. 2012, 48, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, P.; Ma, L.; Cheng, X.; Li, X. Comparative effect of (111) and (110) crystallographic orientation on the passive behavior of low alloy steels in bicarbonate solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 561, 150066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soleimani, M.; Mirzadeh, H.; Dehghanian, C. Effect of grain size on the corrosion resistance of low carbon steel. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 016522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mishra, R.; Balasubramaniam, R. Effect of nanocrystalline grain size on the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of nickel. Corros. Sci. 2004, 46, 3019–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Q.; Sun, Y.; Zuo, H.; Feng, J.; Li, Z.; Cai, Z.; He, L.; Li, H. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of light medium manganese steel: Different rolling directions during warm stamping. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2024, 33, 14119–14133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Z.; Ding, H.; Misra, R.D.K.; Cai, Z.; Li, H. Microstructural evolution and deformation behavior in the Fe–(6,8.5)Mn–3Al–0.2C TRIP steels. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 672, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsai, W.; Chen, J. Galvanic corrosion between the constituent phases in duplex stainless steel. Corros. Sci. 2007, 49, 3659–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, P.; Zheng, W.; Dai, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y. Prominent role of reversed austenite on corrosion property of super 13Cr martensitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 22, 1753–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, B.; Zheng, Q.; Lu, Y.; Jia, C.; Liang, T.; Zheng, C. Stabilizing austenite via intercritical Mn partitioning in a medium Mn steel. Scr. Mater. 2023, 225, 115162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ding, R.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H. Mechanistic role of Mn heterogeneity in austenite decomposition and stabilization in a commercial quenching and partitioning steel. Acta Mater. 2023, 250, 118869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bernard, M.; Golf, A.H.; Thi, B.V. Electrochromic reactions in manganese oxides. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1993, 140, 3065–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM of 0.2%C–3%Al–6%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 600 °C; (b) 650 °C; (c) 700 °C; (d) 750 °C; (e) 800 °C.
Figure 1. SEM of 0.2%C–3%Al–6%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 600 °C; (b) 650 °C; (c) 700 °C; (d) 750 °C; (e) 800 °C.
Metals 15 00275 g001
Figure 2. SEM of 0.2%C–3%Al–8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 600 °C; (b) 650 °C; (c) 700 °C; (d) 750 °C; (e) 800 °C.
Figure 2. SEM of 0.2%C–3%Al–8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 600 °C; (b) 650 °C; (c) 700 °C; (d) 750 °C; (e) 800 °C.
Metals 15 00275 g002
Figure 3. Polarization curves of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 6 Mn; (b) 8.5 Mn.
Figure 3. Polarization curves of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 6 Mn; (b) 8.5 Mn.
Metals 15 00275 g003
Figure 4. Nyquist diagrams of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 6 Mn; (b) 8.5 Mn.
Figure 4. Nyquist diagrams of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a) 6 Mn; (b) 8.5 Mn.
Metals 15 00275 g004
Figure 5. Bode curves of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a,b) 6 Mn; (c,d) 8.5 Mn.
Figure 5. Bode curves of 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe steel with different heat treatment temperatures. (a,b) 6 Mn; (c,d) 8.5 Mn.
Metals 15 00275 g005
Figure 6. Equivalent circuit for the tested steel in 3.5% NaCl solution.
Figure 6. Equivalent circuit for the tested steel in 3.5% NaCl solution.
Metals 15 00275 g006
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) of the two steels.
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) of the two steels.
SteelCAlMnFe
6 Mn0.203.206.090.60
8.5 Mn0.193.118.488.30
Table 2. The polarization curves parameters of 6 Mn steel derived from Figure 3a.
Table 2. The polarization curves parameters of 6 Mn steel derived from Figure 3a.
SamplesEcorr (V) (Mode)Icorr (A/cm2)Epit (V) (Mode)
Cold-rolled−0.821.349 × 10−5−0.44
600 °C−0.891.0 × 10−5−0.70
650 °C−0.841.288 × 10−5−0.65
700 °C−0.861.023 × 10−5−0.70
750 °C−0.933.548 × 10−5−0.68
800 °C−0.909.120 × 10−6−0.64
Table 3. The polarization curves parameters of 8.5 Mn steel derived from Figure 3b.
Table 3. The polarization curves parameters of 8.5 Mn steel derived from Figure 3b.
SamplesEcorr (V) (Mode)Icorr (A/cm2)Epit (V) (Mode)
Cold-rolled−0.766.025 × 10−6-
600 °C−0.927.943 × 10−5−0.49
650 °C−0.881.995 × 10−5−0.62
700 °C−0.904.786 × 10−5−0.65
750 °C−0.891.445 × 10−5−0.65
800 °C−0.922.238 × 10−5-
Table 4. Fitting parameters acquired from Nyquist diagrams of 6 Mn in Figure 4a.
Table 4. Fitting parameters acquired from Nyquist diagrams of 6 Mn in Figure 4a.
SamplesRs (Ω·cm2)CPERc (Ω·cm2)% Error
P (Ω−1·s−n·cm−2)n
Cold-rolled7.631.09 × 10−30.69760.51≤4.66
600 °C6.557.58 × 10−40.70521.97≤3.67
650 °C9.911.58 × 10−30.64433.78≤4.22
700 °C8.091.20 × 10−30.65338.74≤7.51
750 °C7.551.52 × 10−30.711041.10≤4.31
800 °C6.171.02 × 10−30.65766.51≤4.44
Table 5. Fitting parameters acquired from Nyquist diagrams of 8.5 Mn in Figure 4b.
Table 5. Fitting parameters acquired from Nyquist diagrams of 8.5 Mn in Figure 4b.
SamplesRs (Ω·cm2)CPERc (Ω·cm2)% Error
P (Ω−1·s−n·cm−2)n
Cold-rolled6.798.13 × 10−40.66730.95≤2.68
600 °C8.812.38 × 10−30.73974.33≤7.99
650 °C9.621.31 × 10−30.60772.31≤6.27
700 °C7.913.42 × 10−30.51436.55≤5.52
750 °C7.272.34 × 10−30.56813.37≤4.94
800 °C9.861.13 × 10−30.571073.41≤10.31
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, J.; Zuo, H. Influence of Heat Treatment Temperature on the Electrochemical Properties of Cold-Rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe Medium-Manganese Steel. Metals 2025, 15, 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030275

AMA Style

Luo J, Zuo H. Influence of Heat Treatment Temperature on the Electrochemical Properties of Cold-Rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe Medium-Manganese Steel. Metals. 2025; 15(3):275. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Jihui, and Huixin Zuo. 2025. "Influence of Heat Treatment Temperature on the Electrochemical Properties of Cold-Rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe Medium-Manganese Steel" Metals 15, no. 3: 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030275

APA Style

Luo, J., & Zuo, H. (2025). Influence of Heat Treatment Temperature on the Electrochemical Properties of Cold-Rolled 0.2%C–3%Al–6/8.5%Mn–Fe Medium-Manganese Steel. Metals, 15(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop