Next Article in Journal
Development and Performance Evaluation of a Mechanical Connection for Steel and Shape Memory Alloy Bars
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Nickel Content on the Formation of an Interaction Zone during Contact Melting of Titanium with Copper-Nickel Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Fundamental Study on the Preparation of Sodium Tungstate from Wolframite via the Smelting Process

1
School of Metallurgical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
2
National Rare Earth Functional Materials Innovation Center, Ganzhou 341100, China
3
Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2024, 14(3), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/met14030299
Submission received: 2 February 2024 / Revised: 27 February 2024 / Accepted: 29 February 2024 / Published: 1 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Processes in Metallurgical Technologies)

Abstract

:
Tungsten is a high-value resource with a wide range of applications. The tungsten metal is produced via ammonium paratungstate, which is a multi-stage process including leaching, conversion, precipitation, calcination, and reduction. A short process to produce tungsten metal from the electrolysis of molten sodium tungstate has been demonstrated. However, sodium tungstate cannot be directly produced from wolframite in the conventional hydrometallurgical process. There was no information reported in the literature on producing sodium tungstate directly from tungsten concentrates. The present study proposed a simple and low-cost process to produce sodium tungstate by high-temperature processing of wolframite. The mixtures of wolframite, sodium carbonate, and silica were melted in air between 1100 and 1300 °C. High-density sodium tungstate was easily separated from the immiscible slag, which contained all impurities from wolframite, flux, excess sodium oxide, and dissolved tungsten oxide. The slag was further water leached to recover sodium tungstate in the solution. Effects of Na2CO3/Ore and SiO2/Ore ratios, temperature, and reaction time on the recovery of tungstate and the purity of sodium tungstate were systematically studied. Sodium tungstate containing over 78% WO3 was produced in the smelting process, which is suitable for the electrolysis process. The experimental results will provide a theoretical basis for the direct production of sodium tungstate from wolframite. The compositions of the WO3-containing slags and sodium tungstate reported in the present study fill the knowledge gap of the tungsten-containing thermodynamic database. Further studies to use complex and low-grade tungsten concentrates to produce sodium tungstate are underway.

1. Introduction

Tungsten is one of the most strategical minerals due to its special properties, wide applications, lack of potential substitutes, and geographically concentrated production [1,2,3]. Tungsten and alloys are widely used in metalworking, cutting tools, automotive and aircraft production, electronics manufacturing, oil and gas drilling, and defense [4,5,6]. Many tungsten-bearing minerals have been discovered. However, only scheelite (CaWO4) and wolframite ((Fe,Mn)WO4) are abundant and easy to concentrate for extraction [4,6,7,8]. In current industry practices, the concentrates of scheelite, wolframite, or their mixtures are decomposed in a leaching process by soda or/and caustic soda to produce soluble sodium tungstate. Then, the sodium tungstate solution undergoes a purification and a conversion process to obtain pure ammonium paratungstate (APT), which is an important intermediate compound for producing tungsten metal and alloys [4,6,9,10]. Tungsten metal is produced by the decomposition of APT and the reduction of WO3 by hydrogen. Carburization of fine tungsten powder at high temperatures will obtain tungsten carbide. The leaching residue containing valuable elements needs to be further treated to maximize the value of the resource [11,12,13,14,15]. If arsenic-containing ore is used, the leaching residue requires proper harmless treatment to fix the arsenic [16,17]. In the processes of purification and conversion of sodium tungstate solution, a large number of effluents are generated, which need to be treated at a high cost [18]. As a hydrometallurgical process, the digestion of tungsten minerals requires high-grade and fine particle concentrates, which results in a low recovery rate in the mineral processing stage.
To improve the efficient utilization of the limited tungsten resource and overcome the disadvantages of the hydrometallurgical process, a high-temperature-solvent extraction technique has been proposed [19,20,21]. In the H2O-free process, wolframite or scheelite concentrate, sodium carbonate, sodium metasilicate, and/or sodium chloride are melted at temperatures above 1100 °C to obtain two immiscible liquids. The sodium chloride–sodium tungstate phase is used directly for producing tungsten metal or alloys by reduction or electrolysis. The silicate phase containing the oxides of calcium, iron, manganese, and sodium can be further treated to recover valuable elements. Gomes et al. [19] melted a mixture of high-grade wolframite, NaCl, and Na2SiO3 at 1050 to 1100 °C for 2 h. More than 99% of the tungsten was recovered in the halide–tungstate phase, which contained 29.8% WO3, 0.24% FeO, and 0.30% MnO. The rest of the components are NaCl and Na2O. Using similar conditions, Malyshev et al. [20] studied the effects of NaCl and Na2SiO3 concentrations on the recovery of tungsten into the halide–tungstate phase. A 99% recovery rate was achieved by a combination of 45 wt% NaCl and 20 wt% Na2SiO3. The produced halide–tungstate phase contained 31.2% WO3, 0.21% FeO, and 0.33% MnO. Gostishchev V.V. and Boiko V. F. [21] used a mixture of NaCl–NaF–NaCO3 to decompose a scheelite concentrate containing 55 wt% WO3. Up to 93 wt% tungsten was recovered in the halide–tungstate phase after reaction at 850–900 °C for 1 h. If a mixture of NaCl–NaCO3–Na3AlF6 was used at 900–947 °C, 95 wt% recovery could be achieved. The compositions of the produced halide–tungstate phase were not given [21]. In these studies [19,20,21], sodium halides were used as one of the raw materials, which resulted in a halide–tungstate phase to collect tungsten. The halide–tungstate phase contained only 30% WO3, which is much lower than that in sodium tungsten (78.8%) and not suitable for the electrolysis process. Phase equilibrium studies in the system Na2O-SiO2-WO3 show that two immiscible liquids, sodium tungstate and sodium silicate, can be obtained [22,23]. The phase diagrams reported in these studies indicated that the high-temperature-solvent extraction technique can be applied without sodium halides. In a recent study, Xu and Zhao [24] demonstrated by thermodynamic calculations and high-temperature experiments that NaCO3 and SiO2 can decompose wolframite completely at 1050–1200 °C. Over 99% of tungsten can be recovered in the sodium tungstate solution. High NaCO3 and low SiO2 concentrations are beneficial for the decomposition and recovery of tungsten. Although the formation of two liquids was observed, it was not attempted to obtain the sodium tungstate directly from the melt [24]. No information was found in the literature to produce sodium tungstate directly from tungsten concentrates. In the present study, experimental results on high-temperature preparation of sodium tungstate are reported. Effects of NaCO3, SiO2, temperature, and reaction time on recovery of tungsten and purity of the sodium tungsten are discussed.

2. Experimental Procedure

A commercial wolframite concentrate (particle size less than 0.075 mm) was used in the present study, and its dry composition is shown in Table 1. Analytical grades of sodium carbonate and silica were used for the decomposition of the wolframite. WO3, FeO, and MnO are the major components of wolframite.
The experimental procedure used in the present study is shown in Figure 1. The underline words indicate the raw materials, intermediate and final products. An amount of 10 g of wolframite concentrate was well mixed with the required sodium carbonate and silica in an agate mortar. The mixture was pelletized and placed in an alumina crucible (OD 35 mm, ID 30 mm, H 60 mm). A muffle furnace was used for all experiments in the air. The sample was heated to the required temperature with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. After the high-temperature reaction, the sample was cooled to room temperature in the furnace. The crucible was broken carefully to remove the sample inside. High-density sodium tungstate on the bottom of the crucible was covered by the low-density smelting slag. The sodium tungstate was carefully separated from the slag for further analysis. The slag was ground and leached in water at 50 °C for 120 min. The water-to-slag ratio was 5:1, and the WO3-containing leachate was separated from the residue by filtration. The compositions of the sodium tungstate, smelting slag, and leaching residue were analyzed by XRF (PANalytical Axios XRF spectrometer, PANalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands).
The variable parameters used in the extraction of the wolframite included Na2CO3/Ore ratio, SiO2/Ore ratio, temperature, and reaction time. The detailed experimental plan is shown in Table 2. The Na2CO3/Ore and SiO2/Ore ratios are in the range of 0.3 to 1.1. The temperature is in the range of 1100 to 1300 °C and the reaction time is between 30 and 120 min.

3. Results and Discussion

Wolframite reacts with sodium carbonate and silica at high temperatures:
(Fe,Mn)WO4 + Na2CO3 + SiO2 + O2 → Na2WO4 + slag + CO2
Tungsten oxide forms liquid sodium tungstate with sodium oxide, and oxides of iron and manganese from the wolframite form slag with silica and sodium oxide. Immiscible slat (sodium tungsten) and slag are all liquid and separated into two layers due to different densities. Low-density slag is on top of the high-density salt. From the compositions of the reactants listed in Table 2 and the compositions of the sodium tungstate, slag, and leaching residue, mass balance calculations can give the weights of the generated sodium tungstate, slag, and leaching residue. The recovery of WO3 in sodium tungstate and total recovery of WO3 can be calculated from the following equations:
R e c o v e r y   o f   W O 3   i n s o d i u m   t u n g s t a t e = m a s s   o f   W O 3   i n s o d i u m   t u n g s t a t e m a s s   o f   W O 3   i n   t h e   o r e   ×   100
T o t a l   r e c o v e r y   o f   W O 3 = 1 m a s s   o f   W O 3   i n   l e a c h i n g   r e s i d u e m a s s   o f   W O 3   i n   t h e   o r e   ×   100
The total recovery of WO3 calculated from Equation (3) includes the WO3 present in the sodium tungstate and leachate.
The compositions of the slag, sodium tungstate, and leaching residue analyzed by XRF are given in Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5, respectively. The weights of the slag, sodium tungstate, and leaching residue obtained from mass balance are also given in the tables. It can be seen from Table 3 that the loss of WO3 in the slag is in the range of 4–16.9%, indicating that direct recovery of WO3 in the sodium tungsten is in the range of 83.1–96%. FactSage is a powerful thermodynamic model to predict the high temperature reactions of slag and salt [25]. However, tungsten oxides are not included in the slag phase of the current FactSage database. The slag compositions given in Table 3 will provide useful information for the development of a WO3-containing thermodynamic database. In addition to Fe2O3, MnO, and SiO2, 10.3–39.6% Na2O is also present in the slag. The weights of the slag increase with increasing Na2CO3/Ore and SiO2/Ore ratios.
Table 4 shows that WO3 in the sodium tungstate is in the range of 70.2–79.8%, which is close to that in the pure Na2WO4 (78.9 wt%). The WO3 content in the salt of the present study is much higher than those obtained in the previous works [19,20,21]. Most of the NaCl used in these studies [19,20,21] was present in the halide–tungstate phase, resulting in a low WO3 content (≈30%). Up to 2.7 and 0.9 wt% SiO2 and sulfur are present in the sodium tungstate as Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 have similar properties as Na2WO4. The presence of Fe2O3 and MnO in the sodium tungstate indicates that undecomposed wolframite can form a solid solution with Na2WO4. No solid solution information is available for the sodium tungstate in the current database of FactSage 8.3 [25]. It is difficult to accurately predict high-temperature reactions with only pure compounds. The compositions of the sodium tungstate given in Table 4 will support the development of a WO3-containing thermodynamic database. The purity of Na2WO4 in the sodium tungstate depends on the decomposition of wolframite and the dissolution of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4. The weights of the sodium tungstate are relatively constant, between 8.2 and 8.9 g.
WO3 in the leaching residue determines the total recovery of tungsten. It can be seen from Table 5 that up to 99.8% total recovery can be achieved at the optimum conditions. Fe2O3, MnO, SiO2, and Na2O are the major components of the leaching residue. The lowest WO3 in the leaching residue is 0.2 wt%, which is much lower than that in the conventional processes [11,12,13,14,15].
In the conventional extraction process of tungsten from the concentrate, the intermediate product is a water solution of sodium tungstate and sodium hydroxide, which has limited applications. The product of the smelting extraction proposed in the present study is sodium tungstate, which has more direct applications. Direct recovery of tungsten in the form of sodium tungstate can be as high as 96%. However, the total recovery of tungsten is also important because it is a high-value element. High-WO3 in the sodium tungstate indicates a low level of impurities. Effects of the reaction parameters such as Na2CO3/Ore ratio, SiO2/Ore ratio, temperature, and reaction time on the direct and total recovery of tungsten and WO3 in the sodium tungstate are discussed in the following sections.

3.1. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on Recovery of WO3 and Composition of Sodium Tungstate

Figure 2 shows the direct recovery of WO3 in the form of sodium tungstate and WO3 content in the sodium tungstate as a function of Na2CO3/Ore ratio. It can be seen from Figure 2a that initially, the direct recovery of WO3 increases with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio. The maximum recovery of 96% was reached at a Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 0.5 and then the direct recovery of WO3 decreases with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio. This trend can be explained by Figure 2b. It is shown in Table 4 that the weights of the sodium tungstate are relatively constant. The direct recovery of WO3 is a function of WO3 content in the sodium tungstate. It can be seen from Figure 2b that WO3 content in the sodium tungstate decreases with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio. However, it can be seen from Table 4 that although the WO3 content in the sodium tungstate is 79.8% in W11 (Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 0.3), the weight of the salt is lower than W10 (Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 0.5). The direct recovery of WO3 in W11 is lower than that in W10. High Fe2O3 and MnO contents in the salt of W11 indicate that the Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 0.3 is not enough to fully decompose the wolframite. High WO3 in the salt does not guarantee a high purity Na2WO4. The salt in W10 contains lower WO3 (78.3%) than that in W11 (79.8%). However, the content of the Na2WO4 in W10 is higher than that in W11. Figure 2b shows that SiO2 content in the sodium tungstate increases with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio, resulting in a decreased WO3 content.
Figure 3 shows the WO3 content in the leaching residue and the total recovery of WO3 as a function of Na2CO3/Ore ratio. Low WO3 in the residue indicates a high recovery of tungsten, according to Equation (3). It can be seen from Figure 3 that the WO3 content in the leaching residue decreases, and the total recovery of tungsten increases with the increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio. A maximum total recovery of 99.7% is achieved at the Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 1.1.
Figure 4 shows that the effect of the Na2CO3/Ore ratio on the direct recovery of WO3 is different from the total recovery. The direct recovery of WO3 in the form of sodium tungstate has a maximum (96%) at Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 0.5. The total recovery is only 97% at this Na2CO3/Ore ratio. If the Na2CO3/Ore ratio is increased to 1.1, the total recovery of WO3 is increased to 99.7%. However, the direct recovery of WO3 in the form of sodium tungstate is only 84.1% at a Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 1.1. It has been explained in Figure 2 that a minimum amount of Na2CO3 is required to fully decompose the wolframite. However, excess Na2CO3 can cause competitive dissolution of Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 into the sodium tungstate, resulting in a lower recovery of WO3 in the sodium tungstate. On the other hand, more Na2O in the smelting slag increases the basicity of the smelting slag which enables more Na2WO4 to be formed and leached into water. Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 provide options for the industry to decide the operating parameters according to their requirements.

3.2. Effect of SiO2/Ore on Recovery of WO3 and Composition of Sodium Tungstate

When the Na2CO3/Ore ratio is fixed, the effect of the SiO2/Ore ratio on the direct recovery of WO3 and WO3 content in the sodium tungstate is shown in Figure 5. It can be seen from Figure 5a that the direct recovery of WO3 increases continuously with increasing SiO2/Ore ratio. An increase in the SiO2/Ore ratio from 0.3 to 1.1 resulted in an increase in the direct recovery from 84.1 to 93.2%. Figure 5b shows that the WO3 content in the sodium tungstate initially increases and then decreases with increasing SiO2/Ore ratio. The maximum WO3 content in the sodium tungstate is obtained at the SiO2/Ore ratio of 0.7. It can be seen from Table 4 that the SiO2 and sulfur contents in the sodium tungstate also decrease with increasing SiO2/Ore ratio. Therefore, both high recovery and purity of Na2WO4 can be obtained by high SiO2/Ore ratio. However, the total recovery of tungsten must be considered to determine the optimum parameters.
Figure 6 shows the WO3 content in the leaching residue and the total recovery of WO3 as a function of SiO2/Ore ratio. As expected, the trend of total recovery of WO3 is opposite to that for the WO3 content in the leaching residue. It can be seen from Figure 6 that the total recovery of tungsten initially decreases and then increases with increasing SiO2/Ore ratio. However, at higher SiO2/Ore ratios (0.9 and 1.1), the total recovery of WO3 is still below 94%.
Figure 7 shows the effect of SiO2/Ore ratio on the direct recovery and total recovery of WO3. Although both direct recovery and total recovery of WO3 increase with increasing SiO2/Ore ratio at higher SiO2/Ore ratios (above 0.7), the total recovery of WO3 is too low. Unless the high recovery and purity of Na2WO4 are more important than the total recovery of WO3, the SiO2/Ore ratio is better to be controlled at a lower level. A low SiO2/Ore ratio can also reduce the slag and residue weights.

3.3. Effect of Temperature on Recovery of WO3 and Composition of Sodium Tungstate

When both Na2CO3/Ore and SiO2/Ore ratios are fixed, the temperature can affect the direct recovery of WO3 and WO3 content in the sodium tungstate. It can be seen from Figure 8 that, at Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, the direct recovery of WO3 and WO3 content in the sodium tungstate increases with increasing temperature. The direct recovery of WO3 increases from 83.4 to 85%, and WO3 content in the sodium tungstate increases from 70.9 to 72.5% when the temperature is increased from 1100 to 1300 °C. It seems that the direct recovery of WO3 and WO3 content in the sodium tungstate are not very sensitive to the temperature. On the other hand, it can be seen from Table 4 that the SiO2 and MnO contents also increase with increasing temperature. Therefore, high-temperature operation can cost high energy and reduce the purity of the Na2WO4.
Figure 9 shows a clear but not significant effect of temperature on the WO3 content in the leaching residue and total recovery of WO3. The WO3 content in the leaching residue increases, and the total recovery of WO3 decreases with increasing temperature. It can be seen that the total recovery of WO3 decreases from 99.8 to 99.5% when the temperature is increased from 1100 to 1300 °C. Low-temperature smelting seems to be more efficient in recovering tungsten from the wolframite. The WO3 content in the leaching residue is below 0.2 wt% at 1100 °C.
Figure 10 shows that temperature has the opposite effect on the direct recovery and total recovery of WO3. However, the extent of the effect is different in the direct recovery and total recovery of WO3. When the temperature is increased from 1100 to 1300 °C, the total recovery of WO3 only decreases from 99.8 to 99.5%. The same increment of the temperature increases the direct recovery of WO3 increases from 83.4 to 85%.

3.4. Effect of Reaction Time on Recovery of WO3 and Composition of Sodium Tungstate

When other parameters are fixed, the effect of reaction time on the recovery of WO3 and the composition of the sodium tungstate are shown in Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13. It can be seen from Figure 11 that extending the reaction time from 30 to 120 min decreases the WO3 content in the slag from 11.3 to 10.2 and increases the direct recovery of WO3 from 83.1 to 84.5%. The WO3 content in the sodium tungstate increases from 70.2 to 72.5% when the reaction time is increased from 30 to 120 min.
The reaction time has little effect on the WO3 content in the leaching residue and the total recovery of WO3. It can be seen from Figure 12 that the WO3 content in the leaching residue decreases, and the total recovery of WO3 increases slightly with increasing reaction time. Considering the productivity and energy consumption, 60 min is enough to complete the smelting reaction of wolframite.
Figure 13 shows the effect of reaction time on the direct recovery and total recovery of WO3. The total recovery is around 99.7% when the reaction time is between 30 and 120 min. The direct recovery of WO3 is increased from 84.1 to 84.5% when the reaction time is extended from 60 to 120 min.

4. Conclusions

Sodium tungstate is a potential raw material to produce tungsten metal via electrolysis. Direct production of sodium tungstate from wolframite has not been reported. The present study demonstrated that high-purity sodium tungstate can be directly produced from wolframite with a high recovery. Effects of Na2CO3/Ore ratio, SiO2/Ore ratio, temperature, and reaction time on the direct and total recovery of tungsten and WO3 in sodium tungstate were investigated systematically. The compositions of the WO3-containing slags and sodium tungstate reported in the present study fill the knowledge gap of the tungsten-containing thermodynamic database. The important findings include the following:
  • Direct recovery of tungsten can be achieved in the form of Na2WO4 initially increasing and then decreasing with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio. The SiO2/Ore ratio increases the direct recovery of tungsten continuously. Temperature and reaction time slightly increase the direct recovery of tungsten. At a Na2CO3/Ore ratio of 0.5 and SiO2/Ore ratio of 0.3, 96% tungsten can be directly recovered as sodium tungstate.
  • The WO3 content in sodium tungstate decreases with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio and has a maximum with SiO2/Ore ratio. Temperature and reaction time can slightly increase the WO3 content in sodium tungstate. A percentage of 78% WO3 in sodium tungstate (≈99% sodium tungstate) can be obtained at a range of Na2CO3/Ore and SiO2/Ore ratios.
  • Total recovery of tungsten increases with increasing Na2CO3/Ore ratio. The SiO2/Ore ratio initially decreases and then increases the total recovery of tungsten. The total recovery of tungsten decreases slightly with increasing temperature and is almost independent of the reaction time above 30 min.
  • Up to 11.3 wt% WO3 was reported in the silicate slag. Up to 2.7% SiO2, 0.9 wt% SO3, 2.1 wt% Fe2O3, and 3.6 wt% MnO were reported in the sodium tungstate. These experimental data will support the development of a WO3-containing thermodynamic database.

Author Contributions

Methodology, B.Z. and L.X.; Validation, B.Z. and L.X.; Formal analysis, L.X. and B.Z.; Resources, B.Z.; Data curation, L.X.; Writing—original draft, L.X.; Writing—review and editing, B.Z. and L.X.; Supervision, B.Z.; Project administration, B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Han, Z.; Golev, A.; Edraki, M. A Review of Tungsten Resources and Potential Extraction from Mine Waste. Minerals 2021, 11, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tkaczyk, A.H.; Bartl, A.; Amato, A.; Lapkovskis, V.; Petranikova, M. Sustainability evaluation of essential critical raw materials: Cobalt, niobium, tungsten and rare earth elements. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 203001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.Y.; Ye, Y.Q.; Zhang, F.L.; Wang, D. Recommended Management Strategies and Resources Status of Chinese Tungsten in the New Period. Mod. Min. 2018, 34, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lassner, E.; Schubert, W. Tungsten-Properties, Chemistry, Technology of the Element, Alloys, and Chemical Compounds, 1st ed.; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 283–374. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurlov, A.S.; Gusev, A.I. Tungsten Carbides-Structure, Properties and Application in Hardmetals, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shen, L.; Li, X.; Lindberg, D.; Taskinen, P. Tungsten extractive metallurgy: A review of processes and their challenges for sustainability. Miner. Eng. 2019, 142, 105934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gedgagov, E.I.; Besser, A.D.; Yanakov, V.Y.; Smolyarchuk, V.P. Analyzing the raw materials market and methods for processing tungsten concentrates to obtain competitive products. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2009, 43, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Premchand. Processing of low grade tungsten ore concentrates by hydrometallurgical route with particular reference to India. Bull. Mater Sci. 1996, 19, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gaur, R.S. Modern Hydrometallurgical Production Methods for Tungsten. JOM 2006, 58, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baimbetov, B.; Moldabayeva, G.; Yeleuliyeva, A.; Jumankulova, S.; Taimassova, A.; Adilzhan, A.; Baisultanov, R.; Yakob, E.; Serikbayev, V. Prospects of Processing Tungsten Ores from the Akchatau Deposit. Processes 2024, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, K.; Ma, X.D.; Zhao, B.J. Harmless Treatment and Valuable Metals Recovery of Tungsten Leaching Residues: A Thermodynamic and Experimental Study. JOM 2021, 73, 1937–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.; Ma, X.D.; Su, K.; Liao, C.F.; Zhao, B.J. Fundamental studies for high temperature processing of tungsten leaching residues for alloy formation. Tungsten 2020, 2, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, H.; Liu, H.L.; Nie, C.X. Comprehensive Treatments of Tungsten Slags in China: A Critical Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhu, X.R.; Liu, X.H.; Chen, X.Y.; Li, J.T.; He, L.H.; Zhao, Z.W. Comprehensive utilization and development trend of tungsten smelting slag. Conserv. Util. Miner. Resour 2019, 39, 119. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai, Y.Y.; Zhong, H.; Zong, H.Y. Novel process for preparation of mangano-manganic oxide from tungsten residue. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met. 2012, 22, 1242. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, Y.L.; Guo, X.Y.; Wang, Q.M.; Tian, H.Q.; Huang, S.B.; Zhang, J.X. Tungsten and arsenic substance flow analysis of a hydrometallurgical process for tungsten extracting from wolframite. Tungsten 2021, 3, 348–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xie, H.; Zhao, Z.W.; Cao, C.F.; Liang, Y.; Li, J.T. Behavior of arsenic in process of removing molybdenum by sulfide method. J. Cent. South Univ. 2012, 42, 435–439. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao, Z.W. Tungsten Metallurgy: Fundamentals and Applications, 1st ed.; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 230–270. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gomes, J.M.; Raddatz, A.E.; Carnahan, T.G. Preparation of tungsten carbide by gas sparging tungstate melts. J. Met. 1985, 37, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malyshev, V.V.; Uskova, N.N.; Gab, A.I. High-temperature selective extraction of Tungsten from Tungsten concentrates in ionic melts. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 47, 1622–1623. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gostishchev, V.V.; Boiko, V.F. Obtaining Tungsten Powder from the Scheelite Concentrate in ion melts. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2008, 42, 728–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stemprok, M. Geological significance of immiscibility in fused silicate systems containing tungsten and molybdenum. Int. Geol. Rev. 1975, 17, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, B.J.; Su, K.; Ma, X.D. Experimental Determination of Phase Equilibria in the Na2O-SiO2-WO3 System. Metals 2021, 11, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, L.Q.; Zhao, B.J. Extraction of Sodium Tungstate from Tungsten Ore by Pyrometallurgical Smelting. Metals 2023, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bale, C.W.; Bélisle, E.; Chartrand, P.; Decterov, S.A.; Eriksson, G.; Gheribi, A.E.; Hack, K.; Jung, I.H.; Kang, Y.B.; Melançon, J.; et al. FactSage thermodynamic software and databases 2010–2016. Calphad 2016, 55, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental procedure in the present study.
Figure 1. Experimental procedure in the present study.
Metals 14 00299 g001
Figure 2. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Figure 2. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on total recovery of WO3, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Figure 3. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on total recovery of WO3, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g003
Figure 4. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Figure 4. Effect of Na2CO3/Ore on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g004
Figure 5. Effect of SiO2/Ore on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Figure 5. Effect of SiO2/Ore on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g005
Figure 6. Effect of SiO2/Ore on total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Figure 6. Effect of SiO2/Ore on total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g006
Figure 7. Effect of SiO2/Ore on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Figure 7. Effect of SiO2/Ore on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, 1200 °C, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g007
Figure 8. Effect of temperature on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 60 min.
Figure 8. Effect of temperature on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g008
Figure 9. Effect of temperature on total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 60 min.
Figure 9. Effect of temperature on total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g009
Figure 10. Effect of temperature on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 60 min.
Figure 10. Effect of temperature on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 60 min.
Metals 14 00299 g010
Figure 11. Effect of reaction time on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C.
Figure 11. Effect of reaction time on (a) direct recovery of WO3 and (b) WO3 and SiO2 contents in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C.
Metals 14 00299 g011
Figure 12. Effect of reaction time on total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C.
Figure 12. Effect of reaction time on total recovery of WO3, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C.
Metals 14 00299 g012
Figure 13. Effect of reaction time on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3 and WO3 content in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C.
Figure 13. Effect of reaction time on direct recovery and total recovery of WO3 and WO3 content in sodium tungstate, Na2CO3/Ore = 1.1, SiO2/Ore = 0.3, 1200 °C.
Metals 14 00299 g013
Table 1. Composition of wolframite used in this study (wt%).
Table 1. Composition of wolframite used in this study (wt%).
WO3CaOFeOMnOSiO2S
78.0 1.1 10.7 7.9 1.7 0.6
Table 2. Experimental conditions of wolframite smelting in air.
Table 2. Experimental conditions of wolframite smelting in air.
Exp NoOre (g)Temp (°C)Time (min)Na2CO3 (g)SiO2 (g)
W11012006073
W21012006093
W310120060113
W410120060115
W510120060117
W610120030113
W7101200120113
W810110060113
W910130060113
W101012006053
W111012006033
W1210120060119
W13101200601111
Table 3. Weights and compositions of smelting slag and WO3 loss in the slag.
Table 3. Weights and compositions of smelting slag and WO3 loss in the slag.
Exp NoWeight
(g)
Composition (wt%)WO3 Loss
in Slag (%)
Fe2O3SiO2MnOSO3WO3Na2O
W18.3 18.240.110.70.04.526.45.2
W29.6 15.734.49.20.15.734.97.6
W310.9 13.728.97.70.110.638.915.9
W413.2 11.340.36.70.16.135.511.1
W515.2 9.948.35.80.15.130.810.6
W610.9 13.628.87.90.211.338.316.9
W711.0 13.929.77.40.210.238.515.5
W810.9 14.029.27.80.111.037.916.6
W911.0 13.729.27.30.29.939.615.0
W107.1 20.846.711.00.34.117.14.0
W116.3 20.253.67.70.08.210.37.2
W1216.9 9.154.85.10.13.327.67.8
W1318.7 8.259.64.60.12.625.06.8
Table 4. Weights and compositions of sodium tungstate and direct recovery of WO3.
Table 4. Weights and compositions of sodium tungstate and direct recovery of WO3.
Exp NoWeight
(g)
Composition (wt%)Direct Recovery of WO3 (%)
Fe2O3SiO2MnOSO3WO3Na2O
W18.8 0.00.20.00.978.320.694.8
W28.6 0.00.50.00.977.321.492.4
W38.5 0.22.10.30.871.225.484.1
W48.3 0.00.50.00.877.721.088.9
W58.2 0.00.10.00.978.420.689.4
W68.6 0.32.70.40.870.225.683.1
W78.4 0.11.60.40.872.524.684.5
W88.5 0.11.20.10.770.927.083.4
W98.5 0.22.20.60.872.523.685.0
W108.9 0.40.00.80.778.319.796.0
W118.4 2.10.13.60.479.814.092.8
W128.6 0.00.00.00.578.021.492.2
W138.7 0.00.00.00.677.222.193.2
Table 5. Weights and compositions of leaching residue and total recovery of WO3.
Table 5. Weights and compositions of leaching residue and total recovery of WO3.
Exp
No
Weight
(g)
Composition (wt%)Total Recovery of WO3 (%)
Fe2O3SiO2MnOSO3WO3Na2O
W18.1 18.941.411.20.02.226.297.5
W28.6 18.237.210.70.00.932.998.9
W36.9 31.130.517.60.00.320.599.7
W412.4 12.042.67.10.14.533.792.3
W514.9 10.049.55.90.14.629.990.6
W66.6 36.624.722.10.00.316.299.7
W77.5 29.627.818.00.00.224.399.7
W87.3 29.828.718.50.00.222.899.8
W97.2 30.530.615.40.00.523.099.5
W106.9 21.447.311.30.13.116.797.0
W116.2 20.854.27.90.07.19.993.9
W1216.8 8.955.35.10.13.127.592.7
W1318.5 8.160.24.70.12.624.393.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Zhao, B. A Fundamental Study on the Preparation of Sodium Tungstate from Wolframite via the Smelting Process. Metals 2024, 14, 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14030299

AMA Style

Xu L, Zhao B. A Fundamental Study on the Preparation of Sodium Tungstate from Wolframite via the Smelting Process. Metals. 2024; 14(3):299. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14030299

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Liqiang, and Baojun Zhao. 2024. "A Fundamental Study on the Preparation of Sodium Tungstate from Wolframite via the Smelting Process" Metals 14, no. 3: 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14030299

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop