Next Article in Journal
pH Sensing for Early Detection of Septic Inflammation Based on Intrinsic Titanium β-Alloy Nanotubular Oxides
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Dynamics Research on Fe Precipitation Behavior of Cu95Fe5 Alloys during Rapid Cooling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inverse Magnetocaloric Effect in Heusler Ni44.4Mn36.2Sn14.9Cu4.5 Alloy at Low Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement in the Hydrogen Storage Properties of MgH2 by Adding NaAlH4

1
Division of Advanced Materials Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
2
Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Research Center, Engineering Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Energy Storage/Conversion Engineering of Graduate School (BK21 FOUR), Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2024, 14(2), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/met14020227
Submission received: 28 December 2023 / Revised: 28 January 2024 / Accepted: 9 February 2024 / Published: 13 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallic Functional Materials: Development and Applications)

Abstract

:
Milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-50NaAlH4, and MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 samples were prepared by milling in a planetary ball mill in hydrogen atmosphere (reactive mechanical milling, RMM). Decomposition temperatures of milled MgH2, NaAlH4, MgH2-10NaAlH4, and MgH2-30NaAlH4 were examined in a Sieverts-type hydrogen absorption and release apparatus, in which the hydrogen pressures were kept nearly constant during hydrogen absorption or release. As the content of NaAlH4 in the sample increased, the temperature at the highest peak in the ratio of increase in released hydrogen quantity to increase in temperature versus temperature curve decreased. Hydriding in 12 bar hydrogen and dehydriding in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K of MgH2-30NaAlH4 are performed by the reversible reactions MgH2 ⇔ Mg + H2 and 17MgH2 + 12Al ⇔ Mg17Al12 + 17H2. MgH2-30NaAlH4 was the best Mg-based composite among Mg-based alloys in which an oxide, a halide, a fluoride, or a complex hydride was added, with a high hydrogen absorption rate for 2.5 min (2.20 wt% H/min) and a large effective hydrogen storage capacity (7.42 wt% H).

1. Introduction

Clean alternative energies have drawn interest in preventing air pollution and climate change. One of the clean alternative energies is hydrogen energy, which is the energy produced by the reaction of hydrogen with oxygen, producing water as a by-product. The problems to be solved for applying hydrogen energy to practical use are hydrogen production and storage.
Hydrogen is usually stored in a gaseous state under high pressure and in a cryogenic liquid state. Storing gaseous hydrogen has disadvantages such as safety issues, high cost, and hydrogen embrittlement of storage tank materials. Storage of hydrogen in a cryogenic liquid state has drawbacks such as thermal losses in the case of an open system, safety, and cost of liquefaction.
Another method to store hydrogen is solid-state hydrogen storage using materials such as metal hydrides. Metal hydrides have advantages such as high gravimetric and volumetric storage capacities and safety, as metal hydrides can absorb and release hydrogen at relatively low pressures. Hydrogen is bound by chemical or physical forces in hydrogen storage based on solid-state materials. The technique of storing hydrogen in a solid state has become very attractive and is the subject of studies by many researchers. We are interested in synthesizing metal hydrides based on a metal, magnesium (Mg). Mg-based hydrides have relatively high reaction rates and high hydrogen storage capacities.
Complex hydrides such as LiBH4 and NaAlH4 have been studied by many researchers because they have high theoretical hydrogen storage capacities [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Many works were performed to improve the hydriding and dehydriding kinetics of Mg [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Researchers were interested in improving the hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 by adding NaAlH4 with a high hydrogen storage capacity [17,18,19,20,21]. Ali and Ismail [17] reviewed the hydrogen storage properties of the Mg–Na–Al system. The complex hydride NaAlH4 releases hydrogen via three-step reactions:
At 458 − 503 K,  3NaAlH4 → Na3AlH6 + 2Al + 3H2
At 533 K,     Na3AlH6 → 3NaH + Al + (3/2)H2
At 708 K,    3NaH → 3Na + (3/2)H2
Ali and Ismail [17] reported that the addition of NaAlH4 could destabilize the MgH2 effectively and the hydrogen storage properties of NaAlH4 could also be improved by adding MgH2. The MgH2-NaAlH4 system exhibited much better dehydriding properties than unary MgH2 and NaAlH4.
Ismail et al. [20] reported that the following reaction takes place within the temperature range from 443 to 485 K:
NaAlH4 + MgH2 → NaMgH3 + Al + (3/2)H2
A mixing decomposition of the reaction of MgH2 with Al (4) and the decomposition of the excessive MgH2 (5) occurs reversibly between 553 K and 603 K [20].
17MgH2 + 12Al ⇔ Mg17Al12 + 17H2
MgH2 ⇔ Mg + H2
They also reported that NaMgH3 decomposes between 603 K and 633 K by the following reversible reaction:
NaMgH3 ⇔ NaH + Mg + H2
NaH decomposes between 633 K and 648 K by the following reversible reaction [20]:
NaH ⇔ Na + (½)H2.
In the present work, samples with various compositions were prepared and many phenomena were examined such as decomposition temperatures, phase formation, hydrogen absorption and release rates, and hydrogen storage capacity. In addition, the hydrogen storage properties of the prepared samples were compared with those of other Mg-based alloys. In particular, the decomposition temperatures were measured in the Sieverts-type hydrogen absorption and release apparatus, in which the samples were hydrided and dehydrided, by heating the samples at a constant heating rate and simultaneously measuring the released hydrogen quantity. In other researchers’ work, the decomposition temperatures were usually measured in thermal analysis instruments such as thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4 (with a composition of 90 wt% MgH2 + 10 wt% NaAlH4), MgH2-30NaAlH4 (70 wt% MgH2 + 30 wt% NaAlH4), MgH2-50NaAlH4 (50 wt% MgH2 + 50 wt% NaAlH4), and MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 (88 wt% MgH2 + 2 wt% Ni + 10wt% NaAlH4) samples were prepared by milling in a planetary ball mill in hydrogen atmosphere (reactive mechanical milling, RMM). Decomposition temperatures of milled MgH2, NaAlH4, MgH2-10NaAlH4, and MgH2-30NaAlH4 were examined by heating at a rate of 5∼6 K/min in a Sieverts-type hydrogen absorption and release apparatus and phase formation in cycled MgH2-50NaAlH4 were investigated.

2. Experimental Procedures

As starting materials, we used MgH2 (magnesium hydride, purity 98%, Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA), NaAlH4 (hydrogen storage grade, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and Ni (average particle size 2.2–3.0 μm, purity 99.9% metal basis, C typically < 0.1%, Alfa Aesar).
Reactive mechanical milling (RMM) was carried out in a planetary ball mill (Planetary Mono Mill; Pulverisette 6, Fritsch). A mixture with the planned composition (total weight = 8 g) was mixed in a stainless steel container (with 105 hardened steel balls, total weight = 360 g) sealed hermetically, the sample-to-ball weight ratio being 1/45. All samples were handled in a glove box in an argon atmosphere. The disc revolution speed was 400 rpm. The mill container (volume of 250 mL) was then filled with high-purity hydrogen gas of about 12 bar. The RMM was performed for 6 h (by repeating milling for 15 min and pausing for 5 min 24 times). Hydrogen was refilled every 2 h (every eight milling times).
The absorbed or released hydrogen quantity was measured as a function of time by a volumetric method, using the Siverts-type hydrogen absorption and release apparatus previously described [16]. The hydrogen pressure in the reactor was kept at 12 bar during hydriding by dosing the quantity of hydrogen absorbed from a reservoir of known volume. The hydrogen pressure in the reactor was kept at 1.0 bar during dehydriding by removing the quantity of hydrogen released from the reactor to a reservoir of known volume. 0.5 g of the samples was used for these measurements. Samples after hydrogen absorption release cycling were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Ka radiation, using a Bruker D8 Advance (Karlsruhe, Germany) powder diffractometer.

3. Results

The quantity of released hydrogen, Hr (wt% H), was calculated using the sample weight as a standard.
Figure 1 shows the quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature (T) curves and the ratio of increase in Hr to increase in T, dHr/dT, versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 5∼6 K/min in 1.0 bar hydrogen. Table 1 presents the temperatures (K) at peaks in the dHr/dT versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples. The highest peaks appear at 638, 600, 592, and 455 K, respectively, for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4.
Figure 2 shows the quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature (T) curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 5∼6 K/min in 1.0 bar hydrogen. The points 1, 2, 3, and 4 were marked so that they correspond to the beginning and ending points of the peaks in Figure 1. Table 2 presents the temperatures (K) at the marked points in the Hr versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples.
Hydrogen release begins at 627 K for the as-milled MgH2. Hydrogen release from the NaAlH4 begins at 438 K and the slope of the Hr versus T curve then changes at 488, 495, and 625 K. MgH2-10NaAlH4 begins to release hydrogen at 508 K and slopes of the Hr versus T curves change at 525 K and 550 K. MgH2-30NaAlH4 begins to release hydrogen at 480 K and slopes of the Hr versus T curves change at 541, 562, and 633 K.
As the content of NaAlH4 in the sample increases, the temperature at the highest peak decreases. The higher content of NaAlH4 is believed to strengthen the effects of reactive mechanical grinding, lowering the temperatures for the reaction. The effects of reactive mechanical milling are thought to be the creation of defects, making clean surfaces and cracks, and decreasing particle sizes.
The XRD pattern of MgH2-50NaAlH4 dehydrided after the number of cycles, n, of 4 at 593 K is shown in Figure 3. The sample contains Al, MgO, Al3Mg2, NaH, and Mg17Al12. Al, formed from the reaction (4), is believed to react with Mg (formed by the decomposition of MgH2) and form Al3Mg2 and Mg17Al12. The Mg17Al12 phase belongs to the body-centered cubic system with a space group of I-43m (No. 217). Samples were easily ignited on exposure to the oxygen in the air to obtain the XRD pattern. This led to the formation of a strong peak of MgO and relatively weak peaks of other phases. The broad peak of MgO shows that the particles of MgO are very fine. The large width of the peaks also suggests that the sample has many defects. In the XRD pattern of pure MgH2, MgO was not found. However, in the XRD pattern of MgH2-50NaAlH4 after cycling four times, MgO was observed. It is thought that MgO is formed when the sample is exposed to air to obtain the XRD pattern because the particles of the sample are very fine and the surface of the particles are very clean and reactive.
Liu et al. [22] reported that when the temperature is increased to 633 K, a large amount of hydrogen is released, and two new phases, Mg17Al12 and Mg, are formed while the preformed Al and Al3Mg2 disappear.
Figure 4 shows the change of Ha versus time t curve at 593 K in 12 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4. The effective hydrogen storage capacity is defined as the quantity of hydrogen absorbed for 60 min (wt% H). As n increases from one to two, the hydrogen absorption rate for 1 min increases. From n = 2 to n = 4, the hydrogen absorption rate for 1 min decreases. In a similar way, the effective hydrogen storage capacity increases as n increases from one to two, and from n = 2 to n = 4, the effective hydrogen storage capacity decreases. The activation is considered to have been completed after n = 2. At n = 2, MgH2-30NaAlH4 absorbs 4.09 wt% H for 1 min, 7.17 wt% H for 10 min, and 7.42 wt% H for 60 min.
The change of the Hr versus t curve at 593 K in 1.0 bar hydrogen with n for MgH2-30NaAlH4 is shown in Figure 5. As the number of cycles (n) increases from one to four, the hydrogen release rate for 1 min decreases. The hydrogen release rate for 1 min at n = 1 and n = 2 are very similar. The quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min increases as n increases from one to two, and from n = 2 to n = 4 the quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min decreases. At n = 2, MgH2-30NaAlH4 releases 1.31 wt% H for 1 min, 4.95 wt% H for 10 min, and 7.34 wt% H for 60 min.
Figure 6 shows changes in the Ha versus time t curve at 593 K in 12 bar hydrogen and Hr versus t curve at 593 K in 1.0 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4. The curves show that activation is completed after n = 2, showing the highest hydrogen absorption rate, the highest hydrogen release rate, the largest effective hydrogen storage capacity, and the largest quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min. The curves after completion of activation show that MgH2-30NaAlH4 has good reversibility and round-trip energy efficiency.
The Ha versus t curves in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K or 623 K at n = 1 and n = 2 for MgH2-50NaAlH4 are shown in Figure 7. Because the hydrogen absorption rate was low, experiments were performed several times. Even though the samples were handled in an Ar atmosphere, the samples were ignited partly, leading to low hydrogen absorption rates and low effective hydrogen storage capacities. For n = 1 at 593 K, the MgH2-50NaAlH4 sample does not absorb hydrogen. For n = 2 at 623 K, the MgH2-50NaAlH4 sample does not absorb hydrogen either, probably because the difference between the applied hydrogen pressure (12 bar) and the equilibrium plateau pressure at 623 K (6.38 bar [23]) of the Mg-H system is small. At n = 2, the MgH2-50NaAlH4 sample absorbs 0.99 wt% H for 1 min, 1.36 wt% H for 10 min, and 3.19 wt% H for 60 min at 593 K.
Figure 8 shows the Hr versus t curves in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K or 623 K at n = 1∼4 for MgH2-50NaAlH4. Hydrogen release rates are low and the quantities of hydrogen released for 60 min are small. As n increases, the initial hydrogen release rate and the quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min increase slightly. At n = 2, the MgH2-50NaAlH4 sample releases 1.03 wt% H for 5 min and 1.29 wt% H for 60 min at 593 K. When the temperature increases from 593 K to 623 K, the initial hydrogen release rate and the quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min increase slightly. Partial ignition in the samples led to low initial hydrogen release rates and small quantities of hydrogen released for 60 min.
During hydrogen absorption (Figure 3) and release (Figure 4), reactions (5) and (6) are believed to occur.
Ha versus t curves in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 [24,25], activated Mg-10TaF5 [26,27], and activated Mg-10VCl3 [28] are shown in Figure 9. The Mg-10Fe2O3 [24,25], Mg-10TaF5 [26,27], and Mg-10VCl3 [28] samples were also prepared by RMM under conditions similar to those for preparing MgH2-30NaAlH4 and MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4. MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 did not require activation after reactive mechanical milling (RMM). The Ha versus t curve of MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM is used for comparison with the Ha versus t curves of other activated samples. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the highest hydrogen absorption rate for 2.5 min, followed in order by MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the highest effective hydrogen storage capacity, followed in order by activated Mg-10VCl3, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, and activated Mg-10TaF5. MgH2-30NaAlH4 has a much higher hydrogen absorption rate for 2.5 min (2.20 wt% H/min) and a much larger effective hydrogen storage capacity (7.42 wt% H) than the other samples.
Figure 10 shows Hr versus t curves in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 [24,25], activated Mg-10TaF5 [26,27], and activated Mg-10VCl3 [28]. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the highest hydrogen release rate for 2.5 min, followed in order by activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10TaF5, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the largest quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min, followed in order by activated Mg-10VCl3, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3, and activated. MgH2-30NaAlH4 has a much higher hydrogen release rate for 2.5 min (0.86 wt%/min) and a much larger quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min (7.34 wt% H) than the other samples.
Table 3 shows hydrogen absorption properties in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 [24], activated Mg-10TaF5 [26], and activated Mg-10VCl3 [28]. Numbers in parentheses indicate rankings. Ha (x min) (wt% H) means the quantity of hydrogen absorbed for x min. The initial hydrogen absorption rate is defined as the hydrogen absorption rate during 2.5 min and calculated by dividing Ha (2.5 min) by 2.5 min. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the highest initial hydrogen absorption rate, followed in order by MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, and activated Mg-10VCl3 have relatively large values of Ha (10 min). Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the highest effective hydrogen storage capacity, followed in order by MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, and activated Mg-10TaF5.
Table 4 shows hydrogen release properties in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 [24], activated Mg-10TaF5 [26], and activated Mg-10VCl3 [28]. Hr (x min) (wt% H) means the quantity of hydrogen released for x min. The initial hydrogen release rate is defined as the hydrogen release rate during 2.5 min and calculated by dividing Hr (2.5 min) by 2.5 min. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the highest initial hydrogen release rate, followed in order by activated Mg-10VCl3 and activated Mg-10TaF5. The initial hydrogen release rates of MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM and activated Mg-10Fe2O3 are zero. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has a large value of Hr (10 min). Activated Mg-10TaF5, activated Mg-10VCl3, and MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM have relatively large values of Hr (10 min). Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the largest Hr (60 min), followed in order by MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3.
Table 5 summarizes reversibility, cyclability, round-trip energy efficiency, and general practicability for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3. Reversibility (%) is defined as 100 × Hr (60 min)/Ha (60 min) after activation. Cyclability (wt% H/cycle) is defined as the increase in Ha (60 min) per cycle from n =1 to n = 4. Round-trip energy efficiency is defined as Hr (60 min)/Ha (60 min) after activation. General practicability is indicated in ranking by considering all the properties in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5. Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the best reversibility, cyclability, and round-trip energy efficiency, followed in order by MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3. The cyclability of activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 is positive, showing that Ha (60 min) increases roughly from n = 1 to n = 4.
Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has the best general practicability, followed in order by MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10VCl3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10Fe2O3. MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM has a slightly better general practicability than activated Mg-10VCl3.
Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has an initial hydrogen absorption rate of 2.20 wt% H/min (vs. 1.26 wt% H/min for activated Mg-10VCl3), Ha (10 min) of 7.17 wt% H (vs. 5.15 wt% H for activated Mg-10VCl3), an effective hydrogen storage capacity of 7.42 wt% H (vs. 5.56 wt% H for activated Mg-10VCl3).
Activated MgH2-30NaAlH4 has an initial hydrogen release rate of 0.95 wt% H/min (vs. 0.08 wt% H/min for activated Mg-10VCl3), Hr (10 min) of 4.95 wt% H (vs. 1.32 wt% H for activated Mg-10VCl3), an Hr (60 min) of 7.34 wt% H (vs. 5.42 wt% H for activated Mg-10VCl3).
Cyclability in Table 4 is examined only from n = 1 to n = 4. The cyclability of a sample MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 was examined from n = 1 to n = 30 under 12 bar for hydrogen absorption and 1.0 bar H2 for hydrogen release at 593 K. MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 had Ha (60 min) values of 5.62 wt% H at n =1 and 5.36 wt% H at n = 30, showing the good cyclability of −0.009 wt% H/cycle. The lifetimes of the samples were not investigated. We will examine the lifetimes of the samples in future research.

4. Discussion

From the results of Figure 2, it is believed that for the NaAlH4, reaction (1) (decomposition of NaAlH4) begins to occur at 438 K, and reaction (2) (decomposition of Na3AlH6) begins to occur at 495 K. For the MgH2-10NaAlH4 sample, it is believed that reaction (4) occurs between point 1 (508 K) and point 2 (525 K), reactions (5) and (6) begin to occur after point 3 (550 K), and then reaction (7) and reaction (8) occur consecutively. For the MgH2-30NaAlH4 sample, it is believed that reaction (4) occurs between point 1 (480 K) and point 2 (541 K), reactions (5) and (6) begin to occur after point 3 (562 K), and then reaction (7) and reaction (8) occur consecutively. The reaction (4) for the MgH2-30NaAlH4 begins to occur at 28 K lower temperature than that for the MgH2-10NaAlH4.
Samples were easily ignited on exposure to air, making the obtention of XRD patterns difficult and leading to the formation of a strong peak of MgO and relatively weak peaks of other phases. Liu et al. [22] reported that when the temperature is increased to 633 K, the preformed Al and Al3Mg2 disappear. In Figure 3 (the XRD pattern of MgH2-50NaAlH4 dehydrided after the number of cycles, n, of 4 at 593 K), the Al3Mg2 phase is observed. The dehydriding temperature (593 K) lower than that in the work of Liu et al. [22] is believed to have led to this result.
As the content of NaAlH4 in the sample increases, the temperature at the highest peak in the ratio of increase in Hr to increase in T, dHr/dT, versus T curve decreases. The higher content of NaAlH4 is believed to strengthen the effects of reactive mechanical milling. However, too much content of NaAlH4 (as in MgH2-50NaAlH4) leads to worse hydrogen storage properties (hydrogen absorption rate, hydrogen release rate, and hydrogen storage capacity).
From the results of this work and the reported study [20], it is believed that hydriding in 12 bar hydrogen and dehydriding in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K of MgH2-30NaAlH4 are performed by the reversible reactions MgH2 ⇔ Mg + H2 and 17MgH2 + 12Al ⇔ Mg17Al12 + 17H2.
In a planetary ball mill, each jar is located on a circular platform (sun wheel). When the sun wheel turns, the jar rotates around its own axis in the opposite direction. The resulting centrifugal and acting acceleration forces lead to strong grinding effects. RMM can break thin surface oxides and expose fresh metallic surfaces, which are reactive. RMM can also introduce defects and cracks. The propagation of cracks, due to additives acting as the center of stress, makes the particles finer. Defects can be used as the sites active for nucleation. The exposed fresh metallic surfaces and created cracks and surfaces have high reactivity. A decrease in particle size reduces the diffusion distance of hydrogen atoms. The added materials and formed phases are believed to strengthen the effects of RMM. The expansion of the lattice due to hydrogen absorption and the contraction of the lattice due to hydrogen release causes effects similar to those of RMM. However, the effects of lattice expansion and contraction will be weaker than those of RMM. The MgH2-30NaAlH4 sample has a higher hydrogen absorption rate for 2.5 min, a larger effective hydrogen storage capacity, a higher hydrogen release rate for 2.5 min, and a larger quantity of hydrogen released for 60 min than the other samples, showing that the effects of RMM and hydrogen absorption release cycling are stronger in the MgH2-30NaAlH4 sample, compared with those for the other samples. Reportedly, nucleation can be facilitated by creating active nucleation sites by mechanical treatment and/or alloying with additives [29]; the diffusion distance of hydrogen can also be decreased by the mechanical treatment and/or alloying of Mg with additives, thereby reducing the magnesium particle size [30]. In addition, hydrogen mobility can be improved by additives that create microscopic paths of hydrogen [30]; a rough surface of magnesium particles having many cracks and defects is thus considered more advantageous for hydrogen absorption [31].
In our future work, milled NaAlH4 will be prepared by reactive mechanical milling. The quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature T curve and the ratio of increase in Hr to increase in T, dHr/dT, versus the T curve for the milled NaAlH4, will be obtained and studied in detail. Behaviors of the milled NaAlH4, which are different from those of NaAlH4, are expected.
As shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10, the additional effects of NaAlH4, oxide, halides, or fluoride on MgH2 or Mg are different. Which kinds of properties such as physical properties (hardness, toughness, surface area, microstructure, etc.) and chemical properties affect the hydrogen storage properties will be investigated in future work.

5. Conclusions

In the present work, milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4 (with a composition of 90 wt% MgH2 + 10 wt% NaAlH4), MgH2-30NaAlH4 (70 wt% MgH2 + 30 wt% NaAlH4), MgH2-50NaAlH4 (50 wt% MgH2 + 50 wt% NaAlH4), and MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 (88 wt% MgH2 + 2 wt% Ni + 10wt% NaAlH4) samples were prepared by reactive mechanical milling (RMM). Effects of the NaAlH4 content on the temperatures of intermediate reactions were studied for MgH2-NaAlH4 composites. Phase formation in the cycled MgH2-50NaAlH4 was investigated. The hydrogen storage properties of MgH2-30NaAlH4 were compared with those of Mg-based alloys in which oxide, halides, or fluoride were added. Hydrogen release begins at 627 K for the as-milled MgH2. MgH2-30NaAlH4 begins to release hydrogen at 480 K and slopes of the Hr versus T curves change at 541, 562, and 633 K. As the content of NaAlH4 in the sample increased, the temperature at the highest peak in the ratio of increase in Hr to increase in T, dHr/dT, versus T curve decreased. The higher content of NaAlH4 is believed to have strengthened the effects of reactive mechanical milling. MgH2-50NaAlH4 dehydrided after four cycles contained Al, MgO, Al3Mg2, NaH, and Mg17Al12. Hydriding in 12 bar hydrogen and dehydriding in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K of MgH2-30NaAlH4 are performed by the reversible reactions MgH2 ⇔ Mg + H2 and 17MgH2 + 12Al ⇔ Mg17Al12 + 17H2. Activation of MgH2–30NaAlH4 was completed after two hydrogen absorption release cycles. MgH2–30NaAlH4 was the best Mg-based composite among Mg-based alloys in which an oxide, a halide, a fluoride, or a complex hydride was added, with a high hydrogen absorption rate for 2.5 min (2.20 wt% H/min) and a large effective hydrogen storage capacity (7.42 wt% H).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-J.K., M.-Y.S. and K.-T.L.; methodology, Y.-J.K., M.-Y.S. and K.-T.L.; formal analysis, Y.-J.K., M.-Y.S. and K.-T.L.; investigation, Y.-J.K., M.-Y.S. and K.-T.L.; data curation, Y.-J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.K. and M.-Y.S.; writing—review and editing—Y.-J.K., M.-Y.S. and K.-T.L.; project administration, Y.-J.K. and K.-T.L.; funding acquisition, Y.-J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1C1C2009103). This work was also supported by Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korean government (MOTIE) (20213030040110).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author, M.-Y.S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pratthana, C.; Aguey-Zinsou, K.F. Surfactant Induced Synthesis of LiAlH4 and NaAlH4 Nanoparticles for Hydrogen Storage. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Si, T.; Zhang, Q. Enhanced Low-Temperature Hydrogen Storage in Nanoporous Ni-Based Alloy Supported LiBH4. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Feng, L.; An, C.; Wang, Y. High-loading LiBH4 Confined in Structurally Tunable Ni Catalyst-decorated Porous Carbon Scaffold for Fast Hydrogen Desorption. Chem. Asian J. 2023, 18, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.; Sun, Y.; Xu, T.; Ye, J.; Xia, G.; Sun, D.; Yu, X. Reversible Hydrogen Storage Performance of 2LiBH4-MgH2 Enabled by Dual Metal Borides. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 10501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, W.; Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Wong, J.W.; Yao, Z.; Chen, M.; Zheng, J.; Hu, Z.; Chen, L. Extreme high reversible capacity with over 8.0 wt% and excellent hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 combined with LiBH4 and Li3AlH6. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 50, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, X.; Xiao, X.; He, Y.; Yao, Z.; Ye, X.; Kou, H.; Chen, C.; Huang, T.; Fan, X.; Chen, L. Probing an intermediate state by X-ray absorption near-edge structure in nickel-doped 2LiBH4–MgH2 reactive hydride composite at moderate temperature. Mater. Today Nano 2020, 12, 100090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, S.; Liao, W.; Cao, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Ouyang, L. Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 with the co-addition of LiBH4 and YNi5 alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 178, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shang, Y.; Pistidda, C.; Milanese, C.; Girella, A.; Schökel, A.; Le, T.T.; Hagenah, A.; Metz, O.; Klassen, T.; Dornheim, M. Sustainable NaAlH4 production from recycled automotive Al alloy. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Yu, J.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D.M.; Wang, C.Y.; Si, T.Z.; Li, Y.T.; Zhang, Q.A. Coupling of nanoconfinement with metallic catalysis in supported NaAlH4 for low-temperature hydrogen storage. J. Power Sources 2021, 491, 229611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Li, C.; Chen, W.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; Xia, G. Tailoring reversible hydrogen storage performance of NaAlH4 through NiTiO3 nanorods. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 971, 172689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reilly, J.J.; Wiswall, R.H. Reaction of hydrogen with alloys of magnesium and nickel and the formation of Mg2NiH4. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 2254–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Karty, A.; Genossar, J.G.; Rudman, P.S. Hydriding and dehydriding kinetics of Mg in a Mg/Mg2Cu eutectic alloy: Pressure sweep method. J. Appl. Phys. 1979, 50, 7200–7209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Akiba, E.; Nomura, K.; Ono, S.; Suda, S. Kinetics of the reaction between Mg-Ni alloys and H2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1982, 7, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bobet, J.-L.; Akiba, E.; Nakamura, Y.; Darriet, B. Study of Mg–M (M = Co, Ni and Fe) mixture elaborated by reactive mechani cal alloying-hydrogen sorption properties. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huot, J.; Ravnsbæk, D.B.; Zhang, J.; Cuevas, F.; Latroche, M.; Jensen, T.R. Mechanochemical synthesis of hydrogen storage materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2013, 58, 30–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Song, M.Y.; Ahn, D.S.; Kwon, I.H.; Ahn, H.J. Development of Hydrogen storage Alloys by Mechanical Alloying Mg with Fe and Co. Met. Mater. Int. 1999, 5, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ali, N.A.; Ismail, M. Advanced hydrogen storage of the Mg–Na–Al system: A review. J. Magnes. Alloys 2021, 9, 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Plerdsranoy, P.; Meethom, S.; Utke, R. Dehydrogenation kinetics, reversibility, and reaction mechanisms of reversible hydrogen storage material based on nanoconfined MgH2−NaAlH4. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2015, 87, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rafi-ud-din; Xuanhui, Q.; Ping, L.; Zhang, L.; Ahmad, M.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Rafique, M.Y.; Farooq, M.H. Enhanced hydrogen storage performance for MgH2–NaAlH4 system—The effects of stoichiometry and Nb2O5 nanoparticles on cycling behaviour. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 4891–4903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ismail, M.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, X.B.; Mao, J.F.; Dou, S.X. The hydrogen storage properties and reaction mechanism of the MgH2–NaAlH4 composite system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 9045–9050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bendyna, J.K.; Dyjak, S.; Notten, P.H.L. The influence of ball-milling time on the dehydrogenation properties of the NaAlH4–MgH2 composite. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 4200–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Dong, Z.; Ge, H.; Li, S.; Yan, M. Hydrogen Desorption Properties of the MgH2–AlH3 Composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stampfer, J.F.; Molley, C.E.; Suttle, J.F. The Magnesium-Hydrogen System1-3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 3504–3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, M.Y.; Kwon, I.H.; Kwon, S.N.; Park, C.G.; Hong, S.-H.; Bae, J.-S.; Mumm, D.R. Hydrogen-storage properties of Mg–oxide alloys prepared by reactive mechanical grinding. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 415, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, M.Y.; Kwon, S.N.; Park, H.R. Pressure-Composition Isotherms and Cycling Properties of Mg-xFe2O3-yNi Alloys. Korean J. Met. Mater. 2013, 51, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kwak, Y.J.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.R.; Song, M.Y. Review Paper: Hydriding and Dehydriding Reactions of Mg-xTaF5 (x=0, 5, and 10) Prepared via Reactive Mechanical Grinding. Korean J. Met. Mater. 2014, 52, 957–962. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kwak, Y.J.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.R.; Song, M.Y. Hydrogen Storage Characteristics of Mg, Mg-5TaF5, and Mg-5NbF5 Prepared via Grinding in a Hydrogen Atmosphere. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 10508–10514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, M.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Mumm, D.R. Fe2O3, MnO, and VCl3-added Mg composites by reaction involving grinding processing for hydrogen storage. J. Ceram. Proc. Res. 2018, 19, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hjort, P.; Krozer, A.; Kasemo, B. Hydrogen sorption kinetics in partly oxidized Mg films. J. Alloys Comp. 1996, 237, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zaluska, A.; Zaluski, L.; Ström-Olsen, J.O. Nanocrystalline magnesium for hydrogen storage. J. Alloys Comp. 1999, 288, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vigeholm, B.; Kjoller, J.; Larsen, B.; Pedersen, A.S. Formation and decomposition of magnesium hydride. J. Less-Common Met. 1983, 89, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature (T) curves and dHr/dT versus T curves for (a) milled MgH2, (b) MgH2-10NaAlH4, (c) MgH2-30NaAlH4, and (d) NaAlH4 samples. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 5∼6 K/min in 1.0 bar hydrogen.
Figure 1. Quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature (T) curves and dHr/dT versus T curves for (a) milled MgH2, (b) MgH2-10NaAlH4, (c) MgH2-30NaAlH4, and (d) NaAlH4 samples. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 5∼6 K/min in 1.0 bar hydrogen.
Metals 14 00227 g001
Figure 2. Quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature (T) curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 5∼6 K/min in 1.0 bar hydrogen. The points 1, 2, 3, and 4 were marked so that they correspond to the beginning and ending points of the peaks in Figure 1.
Figure 2. Quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus temperature (T) curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 5∼6 K/min in 1.0 bar hydrogen. The points 1, 2, 3, and 4 were marked so that they correspond to the beginning and ending points of the peaks in Figure 1.
Metals 14 00227 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of MgH2-50NaAlH4 dehydrided after number of cycles, n, of 4 at 593 K. Arrows and bars have the same color as that of a phase.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of MgH2-50NaAlH4 dehydrided after number of cycles, n, of 4 at 593 K. Arrows and bars have the same color as that of a phase.
Metals 14 00227 g003
Figure 4. Change in quantity of absorbed hydrogen (Ha) versus time t curve at 593 K in 12 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4.
Figure 4. Change in quantity of absorbed hydrogen (Ha) versus time t curve at 593 K in 12 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4.
Metals 14 00227 g004
Figure 5. Change in quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus t curve at 593 K in 1.0 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4.
Figure 5. Change in quantity of released hydrogen (Hr) versus t curve at 593 K in 1.0 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4.
Metals 14 00227 g005
Figure 6. Changes in Ha versus t curve at 593 K in 12 bar hydrogen and Hr versus t curve at 593 K in 1.0 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4.
Figure 6. Changes in Ha versus t curve at 593 K in 12 bar hydrogen and Hr versus t curve at 593 K in 1.0 bar hydrogen with cycle number, n, for MgH2-30NaAlH4.
Metals 14 00227 g006
Figure 7. Ha versus t curves in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K or 623 K at n = 1 and n = 2 for MgH2-50NaAlH4.
Figure 7. Ha versus t curves in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K or 623 K at n = 1 and n = 2 for MgH2-50NaAlH4.
Metals 14 00227 g007
Figure 8. Hr versus t curves in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K or 623 K at n = 1∼4 for MgH2-50NaAlH4.
Figure 8. Hr versus t curves in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K or 623 K at n = 1∼4 for MgH2-50NaAlH4.
Metals 14 00227 g008
Figure 9. Ha versus t curves in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3.
Figure 9. Ha versus t curves in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3.
Metals 14 00227 g009
Figure 10. Hr versus t curves in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3.
Figure 10. Hr versus t curves in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3.
Metals 14 00227 g010
Table 1. Temperatures (K) at peaks in the dHr/dT versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples.
Table 1. Temperatures (K) at peaks in the dHr/dT versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples.
PeakHighest PeakPeakPeak
Milled MgH2 638
MgH2-10NaAlH4513600
MgH2-30NaAlH4512592
NaAlH4 455552631
Table 2. Temperatures (K) at the marked points in the Hr versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples.
Table 2. Temperatures (K) at the marked points in the Hr versus T curves for milled MgH2, MgH2-10NaAlH4, MgH2-30NaAlH4, and NaAlH4 samples.
Marked Points1234
Milled MgH2627673
MgH2-10NaAlH4508525550
MgH2-30NaAlH4480541562633
NaAlH4438488495625
Table 3. Hydrogen absorption properties in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 (adapted from Ref. [24]), activated Mg-10TaF5 (adapted from Ref. [26]), and activated Mg-10VCl3 (adapted from Ref. [28]). Rankings are indicated in parentheses.
Table 3. Hydrogen absorption properties in 12 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 (adapted from Ref. [24]), activated Mg-10TaF5 (adapted from Ref. [26]), and activated Mg-10VCl3 (adapted from Ref. [28]). Rankings are indicated in parentheses.
SampleInitial Hydrogen Absorption Rate
(wt% H/mn)
Ha (10 min)
(wt% H)
Effective Hydrogen Storage Capacity
(wt% H)
Activated MgH2-30NaAlH42.20 (1)7.17 (1)7.42 (1)
MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM1.31 (2)5.43 (2)5.60 (2)
Activated Mg-10Fe2O30.95 (5)4.28 (4)5.16 (4)
Activated Mg-10TaF51.17 (4)3.82 (5)4.51 (5)
Activated Mg-10VCl31.26 (3)5.15 (3)5.56 (3)
Table 4. Hydrogen release properties in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 (adapted from Ref. [24]), activated Mg-10TaF5 (adapted from Ref. [26]), and activated Mg-10VCl3 (adapted from Ref. [28]). Rankings are indicated in parentheses.
Table 4. Hydrogen release properties in 1.0 bar hydrogen at 593 K for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3 (adapted from Ref. [24]), activated Mg-10TaF5 (adapted from Ref. [26]), and activated Mg-10VCl3 (adapted from Ref. [28]). Rankings are indicated in parentheses.
SampleInitial Hydrogen Release Rate
(wt% H/mn)
Hr (10 min)
(wt% H)
Hr (60 min)
(wt% H)
Activated MgH2-30NaAlH40.95 (1)4.95 (1)7.34 (1)
MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM0 (4)1.21 (4)5.46 (2)
Activated Mg-10Fe2O30 (4)0.23 (5)0.83 (5)
Activated Mg-10TaF50.03 (3)1.56 (2)4.01 (4)
Activated Mg-10VCl30.08 (2)1.32 (3)5.42 (3)
Table 5. Reversibility, cyclability, round-trip energy efficiency, and general practicability for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3. Rankings are indicated in parentheses.
Table 5. Reversibility, cyclability, round-trip energy efficiency, and general practicability for activated MgH2-30NaAlH4, MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM, activated Mg-10Fe2O3, activated Mg-10TaF5, and activated Mg-10VCl3. Rankings are indicated in parentheses.
SampleReversibility (%)Cyclability
(wt% H/Cycle)
Round-Trip Energy EfficiencyRanking in General
Practicability
Activated MgH2-30NaAlH499 (1)0.29 (1)0.99 (1)1
MgH2-2Ni-10NaAlH4 after RMM98 (2)−0.04 (2)0.98 (2)2
Activated Mg-10Fe2O316 (5)−0.117 (5)0.16 (5)5
Activated Mg-10TaF589 (4)−0.075 (4)0.89 (4)4
Activated Mg-10VCl397 (3)−0.065 (3)0.97 (3)3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kwak, Y.-J.; Song, M.-Y.; Lee, K.-T. Improvement in the Hydrogen Storage Properties of MgH2 by Adding NaAlH4. Metals 2024, 14, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14020227

AMA Style

Kwak Y-J, Song M-Y, Lee K-T. Improvement in the Hydrogen Storage Properties of MgH2 by Adding NaAlH4. Metals. 2024; 14(2):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14020227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kwak, Young-Jun, Myoung-Youp Song, and Ki-Tae Lee. 2024. "Improvement in the Hydrogen Storage Properties of MgH2 by Adding NaAlH4" Metals 14, no. 2: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14020227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop