Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Simulation of Solidification of Ti-Containing Steels with Consideration for Possibility of Peritectic Transformation and Second Phase Precipitation
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the First Metallic Works That Represented a Geometric Innovation in Their Architectural Application: The Origin of the Architecture-Engineering Dichotomy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Hydrogen-Induced Plastic Damage Response of 7085-T7651 High-Strength Aluminum Alloy

1
Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute, Luoyang 471023, China
2
Henan Key Laboratory of Technology and Application Structural Materials for Ships and Marine Equipments, Luoyang 471023, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2023, 13(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010040
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022

Abstract

:
The hydrogen-induced plastic loss behavior of titanium alloys is often reported, but there are relatively few studies on high-strength aluminum alloys. In this article, the hydrogen-induced plastic damage behavior of 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy was investigated using a tensile specimen with pre-charging hydrogen, and the microstructure was characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. The results showed that 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy material has certain hydrogen embrittlement sensitivities, and with the increase of hydrogen-charging time, the hydrogen content and sensitivity of the material increases significantly. For the first time, the theoretical analysis and intuitive quantitative characterization of the hydrogen-induced plastic loss behavior mechanism on 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy is stated as the formation of Mg and H segregation formed at the crystal boundary, which will result in the weakening of the crystal boundary.

1. Introduction

The 7xxx high-strength aluminum alloy belongs to the ultra-high-strength aluminum alloy Al-Zn-Mg-Cu series. This alloy is a newly developed high-performance aluminum alloy with excellent comprehensive properties such as high strength, high hardenability and high damage tolerance [1,2,3]. It has been widely used in aerospace, shipbuilding and other fields [4,5,6]. Generally speaking, there are two main failure behaviors of high-strength aluminum alloys. One is stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) caused by corrosion [7] and stress, and the other is environment-induced hydrogen and hydrogen-induced damage. There are many studies on stress-corrosion cracking of high-strength aluminum alloys [8,9,10,11,12]. However, there are relatively few studies on environmentally induced hydrogen and hydrogen-induced damage to high-strength aluminum alloys. Swapnar et al. [13] showed that, at intermediate strain rates, the film interfered and reduced hydrogen entry at intermediate strain rates, while hydrogen embrittlement was significant at the slowest strain rates. Komazaki [14] revealed that hydrogen was absorbed into the alloy by flux treatment and hydrogen content tended to increase with increasing exposure time. However, hydrogen is difficult to detect, and has strong diffusivity in materials. At present, most elemental analysis equipment cannot characterize and quantitatively analyze hydrogen intuitively, and most research on hydrogen interaction mechanisms and damage behavior is inferences, and there is no intuitive evidence. In particular, hydrogen-induced plastic damage behavior of 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy is still unclear.
In this paper, the influence of hydrogen on the plasticity of materials was studied by pre-filling hydrogen in tensile specimens for different time periods, and the depth of hydrogen action was analyzed using a hardness test. Meanwhile, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) was used to observe the hydrogen distribution visually and quantitatively near and far from the fissure.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials

The studied 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy has high strength, good resistance to exfoliation corrosion and stress-corrosion resistance. The aluminum alloy ingot was homogenized at 450~480 ℃ for 24 h, and then free forging was carried out. Three-level enhanced solid solution was used to heat treatment. The measured composition of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy was Al-7.3Zn-1.5Mg-1.5Cu-0.10Zr.
Samples were cut from the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy ingot and polished using silicon carbide grinding papers from 180 to 2000 grit. Microstructures were analyzed using an optical microscope (OM, equipment model: Leica DMI5000M, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and transmission electron microscope (TEM: equipment model: JEM-2100, JEOL, Tokyo Japan). The metallographic structure of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy was α (Al) + dispersed phase + compound phase. The grain size of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy was relatively uniform with a grade of 5.0. The compound phase wasMgZn2, which precipitated along the grain boundary, as shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Pre-Charge Hydrogen

The selected electrochemical cathode hydrogen permeation method was pre-charge hydrogen. The sample and a carbon rod were used as the cathode and anode, respectively. Before pre-charge hydrogen, a calibrated DC-regulated power supply was selected. The electrolyte component was an aqueous ammonium sulfate solution. During hydrogen permeation, the current density was controlled at 2 mA/cm2, the solution concentration was 5%, and the hydrogen-charging time was 5 days, 10 days, and 20 days, respectively. To avoid long-term storage of hydrogen-charged samples in the atmosphere, all samples were stretched within 2 h.
The hydrogen content was measured by German EltraONH-2000 analyzer and the GB/T 223.82-2018 standard [15]. The crucible was a heating body, and impurities were removed by degassing at high temperature. The sample was first removed from the surface hydrogen in a carrier gas (argon), and then melted. The hydrogen was detected by a thermal conductivity detector for detection. The penetration depth of hydrogen in the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy was measured by microhardness tester (VH3300, Wilson, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the ASTM 384 standard [16].
TOF-SIMS technology performed intuitive and quantitative analysis of hydrogen in materials [17,18]. The TOF-SIMS equipment is produced by Czech Tesken.

2.3. Plastic Loss Behavior

Plastic loss behavior was comprehensively reflected by the elongation and fracture morphology of the tensile specimen. The selected sample size is shown in Figure 2 and the test method reference was the standard ASTM E8 [19]. The fracture of the tensile specimen was observed by FEI QUANTA650 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Multiple tensile 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy samples were processed on the same ingot. The surface of each sample was polished to reduce the surface roughness and keep the roughness as consistent as possible. Among them, the uncharged samples were numbered #1, and the samples charged with hydrogen for 5 days, 10 days, and 20 days were numbered #2, #3 and #4, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Hydrogen-Induced Plastic Damage

The properties of all samples after stretching are shown in Table 1. The elongation rate of sample #1 is about 4.9%; the elongation rate of #2, #3 and #4 is about 2.9%, 1.8% and 1.0%, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the elongation rate of all hydrogen-charged samples is significantly reduced. This suggests that the sample charged with hydrogen could cause obvious damage to the plasticity of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy. Meanwhile, with the increase of hydrogen-charging time, the strength also increases slightly.
To study the hydrogen content of the tensile sample under different hydrogen-charging time, a sample with 50 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm was also charged under the same hydrogen-charging conditions. Three parallel samples were selected for the test samples. The average hydrogen content in a blank sample was only 1.1 ppm, while the samples after 5 days, 10 days and 20 days hydrogen charging were about 3.1 ppm, 5.2 ppm and 5.9 ppm, respectively. Therefore, the hydrogen content in the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy samples increases with the hydrogen-charging time.
From the test results, the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy has similar characteristics to steel and titanium alloys. It has a certain solubility for hydrogen, and with the extension of hydrogen-charging time, the hydrogen content in the material increases. Meanwhile, damage behavior is also the same as other metals, i.e., there is obvious hydrogen-induced plastic damage behavior in high-strength aluminum alloys.

3.2. Section Analysis

Figure 3 shows the morphology of different areas on the tensile section of the blank sample without hydrogen charging. Many dimples can be observed, while no obvious brittle fracture features can be found on the entire section.
With the increase of hydrogen content, the fracture brittleness is gradually enhanced. The tensile fracture morphology with different regions after 5 days of hydrogen charging is shown in Figure 4a,b. There were obvious intergranular fracture characteristics in some areas of the cross-section, but the main morphological characteristics are still parabolic dimples. The tensile fracture morphology with different regions after 10 days of hydrogen charging is shown in Figure 5a,b. Compared with the sample with 5 days hydrogen charging, the intergranular fracture area is significantly increased. Furthermore, the parabolic dimples of the crystal plane are reduced, and the dimple openings are smooth. Therefore, the shape of the dimple is slightly inconspicuous. The tensile fracture morphology with different regions after 20 days of hydrogen charging is shown in Figure 6a,b, where there are more intergranular fracture areas on the entire cross-section. After the crystal plane enlargement, no obvious parabolic dimple morphology is observed, and a brittle ridge fracture is mainly observed.

3.3. Hardness Analysis

Watson et al. [20] researched the effects of catholically charged hydrogen on the mechanical properties. The results showed that hydrogen charging could reduce the ductility, increase the tensile strength in tensile tests and form a severely hardened surface region due to increased dislocation density. The hardness surface region quickly saturated, and further charging increased the depth of this region. Hence, the depth of hydrogen infiltration can be determined according to the microhardness change in the material from surface to core. To further verify the influence of hydrogen on the alloy, a hardness analysis on the samples charged with hydrogen for 20 days was conducted. The American Wilson VH3300 microhardness meter used in the hardness test and parameter setting had a test force of 10 g, hardness point intervals of 10 microns, and the hardness test was on the straight line from surface to core. The sudden change point on the hardness change curve is taken to be the hydrogen infiltration depth.
The microhardness gradient of hydrogen-filled samples was analyzed from surface to core. The result is shown in Figure 7. The microhardness of the hydrogen-charged sample changed significantly from the surface to the core, and the hardness turning point was at about 210 μm from the surface. Therefore, charging hydrogen in a 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy at a current density of 2 mA/cm2 for 20 days could make the penetration depth of hydrogen approximately 210 μm, and the surface hardness of the hydrogen-permeable area significantly increased.
For metals, hydrogen permeation can improve the strength of materials. The hardness test results of hydrogen-filled materials also prove that the high-strength aluminum alloy after hydrogen filling has a strengthening effect.

3.4. Hydrogen Analysis

The intuitive and quantitative analyses of hydrogen were performed on tensile samples after pre-charge for 20 days by TOF-SIMS. The peak area was obtained by pseudo-Voigt fitting of the hydrogen peak positions in TOF-SIMS, which is proportional to the hydrogen content. Therefore, we can obtain the relative hydrogen content of different regions of the same sample under the same test conditions by calculating the hydrogen peak area. The test results of hydrogen near the fracture and far from the fracture were shown in Figure 8. The values near the fracture and far from the fracture are 0.000019 and 0.000003, respectively. It can be deduced that the content of hydrogen near the fracture is higher than that far from the fracture.

3.5. Mechanism Analysis

Through test analysis, it can be found that the strength and plasticity of the material were obviously reduced when hydrogen was introduced into materials. In addition, with the increase of hydrogen content, the plasticity of the material decreased more obviously. Generally speaking, the index of hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility (HEI) was calculated according to the following formula [21]:
HEI = φ F φ C φ F
where φF and φC represent the elongation rate of hydrogen-free specimen and hydrogen-charged specimen, respectively.
The calculation results show that the HEI of the samples charged with hydrogen for 5 days, 10 days, and 20 days was about 40.82%, 63.27% and 79.59%, respectively. It concluded that 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy material has a certain hydrogen embrittlement sensitivity, and with the increase of hydrogen-charging time, the hydrogen content of the material increases significantly, and the hydrogen embrittlement sensitivity also increases.
The tensile fracture shows that the samples without hydrogen filling have mainly dimple fracturing, but, after hydrogen charging, they are mainly characterized by intergranular fracture. Moreover, with the prolongation of hydrogen-charging time, the intergranular fracture characteristics of the material become more obvious, and the dimple fracture characteristics gradually disappear. This morphology change, from dimple to intergranular, is a typical characteristic caused by hydrogen in materials [22,23]. In addition, the fracture characteristics along the grain also prove that hydrogen acts mainly at the grain boundary of the material.
Since the aluminum alloy has a face-centered cubic structure and the solubility of hydrogen in aluminum is extremely small, it is considered that hydrogen embrittlement does not exist in the aluminum alloy for a long period of time. However, with the deepening of research, it can be found that hydrogen embrittlement is also one of the common failure modes in high-strength aluminum alloys. Meanwhile, Song et al. [10] reported that hydrogen-induced cracking behavior exists in high-strength aluminum alloys and proved that Mg and H segregation formed at the grain boundary, which leads to the grain boundary weakening and initiates intergranular cracking.

4. Conclusions

(1)
7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy has a certain hydrogen-absorption capacity, which might cause hydrogen-induced plastic damage behavior in the service process.
(2)
The hydrogen-induced plastic damage behavior of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy is mainly characterized by intergranular fracture, which is due to the formation of Mg and H segregation formed at grain boundaries, leading to the embrittlement of the material.
(3)
Hydrogen-induced plastic damage and hydrogen-induced cracking behavior of 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy can be intuitively and quantitatively characterized using the TOF-SIMS method.
(4)
To further understand the effect of hydrogen on high-strength aluminum alloy, we will continue to research the characterization technology of micro–nano structures and the distribution of hydrogen at the crystal boundary.

Author Contributions

X.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; X.Y. and X.Z. (Xianfeng Zhang) performed the experiments; X.Y., X.Z. (Xianfeng Zhang), Z.W. and X.L. analyzed the data; J.C., X.Z. (Xinyao Zhang) and L.G. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; X.Y. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Williams, J.C.; Starke, E.A., Jr. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 5775–5799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Staley, J.T.; Liu, J. Aluminum alloys for aero structures. Adv. Mater. Process. 1997, 152, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Heinz, A.; Haszler, A.; Keidel, C.; Moldenhauer, S.; Benedictus, R.; Miller, W.S. Recent development in aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2000, 280, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prabhu, T. An overview of high-performance aircraft structural Al alloy-AA7085. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 2015, 28, 909–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhou, B.; Liu, B.; Zhang, S. The advancement of 7xxx series aluminum alloys for aircraft structures: A review. Metals 2021, 11, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dursun, T.; Soutis, C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kairy, S.K.; Turk, S.; Birbilis, N.; Shekhter, A. The role of microstructure and microchemistry on intergranular corrosion of aluminium alloy AA7085-T7452. Corros. Sci. 2018, 143, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, S.Y.; Chen, K.H.; Dong, P.X.; Ye, S.P.; Huang, L.P. Effect of heat treatment on stress corrosion cracking, fracture toughness and strength of 7085 aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 2320–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Amoush, A.S. Investigation of corrosion behavior of hydrogenated 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 443, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, R.G.; Dietzel, W.; Zhang, B.J.; Liu, W.J.; Tseng, M.K.; Atrens, A. Stress corrosion cracking and hydrogen embrittlement of an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 4727–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rao, A.U.; Vasu, V.; Govindaraju, M.; Srinadh, K.S. Stress corrosion cracking behavior of 7xxx aluminum alloys: A literature review. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2016, 26, 1447–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, S.Y.; Chen, K.H.; Peng, G.S.; Liang, X.; Chen, X.H. Effect of quenching rate on microstructure and stress corrosion cracking of 7085 aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 2012, 22, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dey, S.; Chattoraj, I. Interaction of strain rate and hydrogen input on the embrittlement of 7075 T6 Aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 661, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Komazaki, S.I.; Kobayashi, K.; Nakayama, T.; Kohno, Y. Evaluation of Susceptibility to Hydrogen Embrittlement of 7075 Aluminum Alloy by Hydrogen Addition Using Flax-Treatment Method. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 1994–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. GB/T 223.82-2007; Steel and Iron—Determination of Hydrogen Content—Inert Gas Impulse Fusion Heat Conductivity Method. Chinese Technical Standard: Beijing, China, 2007.
  16. E384-09; Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials. ASTM Standards: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.
  17. Yang, X.; Luo, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Gao, L. Characterization of hydrogen in ahigh strength aluminum alloy. Mater. Test. 2020, 62, 962–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hamada, S.; Ohnishi, K.; Nishikawa, H.A.; Oda, Y.; Noguchi, H. SIMS analysis of low content hydrogen in commercially pure titanium. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 5692–5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. E8/E8M-16a; Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM Standards: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  20. Watson, J.W.; Meshii, M.; Shen, Y.Z. Effect of cathodic charging on the mechanical properties of aluminum. Metall. Trans. A 1988, 19, 2299–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, P.; Nan, Y.; Yang, G.; Song, X. Effect of solution-treated temperature on hydrogen embrittlement of 17-4 PH stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 703, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bechtle, S.; Kumar, M.; Somerday, B.P.; Launey, M.E.; Ritchie, R.O. Grain-boundary engineering markedly reduces susceptibility to intergranular hydrogen embrittlement in metallic materials. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 4148–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Eliaz, N.; Shachar, A.; Tal, B.; Eliezer, D. Characteristics of hydrogen embrittlement, stress corrosion cracking and tempered martensite embrittlement in high-strength steels. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2002, 9, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microstructure of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy: (a) OM morphology and (b) TEM morphology and diffraction spots of the precipitated phase.
Figure 1. Microstructure of the 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy: (a) OM morphology and (b) TEM morphology and diffraction spots of the precipitated phase.
Metals 13 00040 g001
Figure 2. The dimensions of the tensile specimens (mm).
Figure 2. The dimensions of the tensile specimens (mm).
Metals 13 00040 g002
Figure 3. Tensile fracture morphology of blank sample without hydrogen charging: (a) 500× and (b) 2000×.
Figure 3. Tensile fracture morphology of blank sample without hydrogen charging: (a) 500× and (b) 2000×.
Metals 13 00040 g003
Figure 4. Tensile fracture morphology of hydrogen-charged sample for 5 days: (a) 2000× and (b) 5000×.
Figure 4. Tensile fracture morphology of hydrogen-charged sample for 5 days: (a) 2000× and (b) 5000×.
Metals 13 00040 g004
Figure 5. Tensile fracture morphology of hydrogen-charged sample for 10 days: (a) 2000× and (b) 4000×.
Figure 5. Tensile fracture morphology of hydrogen-charged sample for 10 days: (a) 2000× and (b) 4000×.
Metals 13 00040 g005
Figure 6. Tensile fracture morphology of hydrogen-charged sample for 20 days: (a) 2000×and (b) 5000×.
Figure 6. Tensile fracture morphology of hydrogen-charged sample for 20 days: (a) 2000×and (b) 5000×.
Metals 13 00040 g006
Figure 7. The hardness change inthe hydrogen-charged sample.
Figure 7. The hardness change inthe hydrogen-charged sample.
Metals 13 00040 g007
Figure 8. The integrated area of hydrogen peak.
Figure 8. The integrated area of hydrogen peak.
Metals 13 00040 g008
Table 1. The properties and hydrogen content of 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy in different states.
Table 1. The properties and hydrogen content of 7085-T7651 high-strength aluminum alloy in different states.
Sample No.Hydrogen Content (ppm)Properties
Rm (MPa)A (%)
10.8, 1.3, 1.1 (σ: 0.25)444, 448, 443 (σ: 2.65)5.2, 5.0, 4.5 (σ: 0.36)
22.8, 3.1, 3.3 (σ: 0.25)472, 465, 470(σ: 3.61)2.6, 2.9, 3.2 (σ: 0.30)
35.4, 5.1, 5.2 (σ: 0.15)475, 478, 478(σ: 1.73)2.1, 1.5, 1.7(σ: 0.31)
45.6, 6.1, 6.0 (σ: 0.26)488, 472, 477(σ: 8.19)1.0, 0.8, 1.2 (σ: 0.20)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Gao, L. Study of Hydrogen-Induced Plastic Damage Response of 7085-T7651 High-Strength Aluminum Alloy. Metals 2023, 13, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010040

AMA Style

Yang X, Zhang X, Chen J, Wang Z, Li X, Zhang X, Gao L. Study of Hydrogen-Induced Plastic Damage Response of 7085-T7651 High-Strength Aluminum Alloy. Metals. 2023; 13(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Xiao, Xianfeng Zhang, Jieming Chen, Zhenzhong Wang, Xuefeng Li, Xinyao Zhang, and Lingqing Gao. 2023. "Study of Hydrogen-Induced Plastic Damage Response of 7085-T7651 High-Strength Aluminum Alloy" Metals 13, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop