Next Article in Journal
On Grain Boundary Engineering for a 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Selective Sulfation Roasting for Cobalt and Lithium Extraction from Industrial LCO-Rich Spent Black Mass
Previous Article in Journal
Progress and Perspective of Ultra-High-Strength Martensitic Steels for Automobile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of a Pyrometallurgical Process to Efficiently Recover Valuable Metals from Commercially Used Lithium-Ion Battery Cathode Materials LCO, NCA, NMC622, and LFP
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermodynamics of Vacuum Chloride Volatilization of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu in Spent Lithium−Ion Battery

1
Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
2
National Engineering Laboratory of Vacuum Metallurgy, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(12), 2183; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122183
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022

Abstract

:
In recent years the chlorination leaching separation process in the field of hydrometallurgy has been developed considerably. However, the development of the chlorination separation process in the field of pyrometallurgy has lagged. In this paper, the thermodynamics of vacuum chlorination volatilization of valuable metals Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu from spent lithium−ion batteries is investigated, and it is found that chlorination helps to achieve the trapping and separation of the singlet metals. With the help of Factsage 8.1, a theoretical map of the stable regions of valuable metal chlorides, the order of separation of each chloride at 10 Pa, and a discussion of the behavior of excess CuCl2 in the system at different temperatures were determined. This paper provides research ideas in the fields of selective separation of alloying elements in the carbothermal reduction products of waste lithium−ion batteries and one−step separation of valuable metals by carbothermal reduction.

1. Introduction

With the shortage of metal resources such as Ni, Co, and Li, the prices of these valuable metals continue to soar. In order to meet the resource requirements for the production of lithium−ion batteries, recycling spent batteries is going to be of increasing importance. The mainstream method for the extraction of valuable metals from waste lithium−ion batteries (LIBs) is to use inorganic acids [1], organic acids [2] or mixed acids [3] to transfer the valuable metals into the solution system, and then use oxalate [4], carbonate [5] and other precipitants to gradually separate the valuable metals Ni, Co, Mn, and Li by adjusting the potential of hydrogen (pH). In this process, nearly pure valuable metal compounds can be recovered [6]. Acid leaching plays an indispensable role in removing valuable metals from spent LIBs, but the problem of treating waste acid and exhaust gas has always impeded its further application.
As a viable solid waste treatment method, the chlorination process is widely used in the treatment and recovery of heavy metals from municipal solid waste [7,8], tailings [9], medical waste [10] and nuclear waste [11]. Hydrochloric acid was gradually replaced by non−volatile chlorinating agents such as CaCl2 [12], NaCl [13], and MgCl2 [14] in order to prevent acid loss and air pollution caused by its volatilization.
According to relevant research [15], nearly half of the studies in the field of lithium−ion battery recycling which use acid leaching technology still use hydrochloric acid as a reducing agent or leaching agent. In order to improve this situation, some studies [16] proposed chlorinating the valuable metal Li in the waste battery using the chlorinating agent CaCl2. This was done by immersing it in water to obtain an aqueous solution of LiCl for subsequent treatment. This process not only separates the valuable metal Li from the lithium battery waste by strictly controlling the conditions, but also has superior selectivity. However, the chlorinating agent used is easily soluble in water and will introduce additional impurity elements; and the obtained by−products will react with water to complicate the solution system, which has brought significant impact and challenges to the ecological environment. Research using the chlorination process is mainly carried out under normal pressure and low temperature [17,18,19]. Therefore, it is particularly pertinent to study the thermodynamics of chloride transformation and volatilization under the coupled vacuum−high temperature condition.
The thermodynamics of vacuum chloride volatilization of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu in spent lithium−ion battery [15] cathode materials were investigated in this paper. Firstly, starting from the elements contained in the waste lithium battery, through thermodynamic calculation, the appropriate chlorinating agent is selected without introducing new impurities. Analyze the thermodynamic equilibrium diagram of the chloride system of each element and determine the possibility and conditions of the reaction from the perspective of theoretical calculation. The method for separating valuable metals by vacuum chlorination, based on pyrometallurgy, solves the problem that these elements are difficult to separate and purify due to their similar physical and chemical properties, and provides a solution for the subsequent treatment of related wastes.

2. Thermodynamic Calculation

The thermodynamic data in this paper were obtained and computed by Factsage 8.1. Pressure has a significant influence on the boiling point (sublimation point) of a substance. Generally, the isothermal equation of Van ‘t Hoff chemical reaction is used. The Gibbs free energy change of the reaction under actual conditions is calculated and deduced. The boiling point of the substance under the corresponding conditions is indirectly determined [20]. Use Equation (2) to calculate the ΔG of the general chemical reaction equation (Equation (1)) and apply the interpolation method to obtain the corresponding temperature when ΔG = 0, which is the boiling point of the substance under the corresponding pressure.
Compound(s, l) = Compound(g)
Δ G = Δ G θ + [ 2.303 R T lg ( p Cl 2 p θ ) ] 1000 + i [ Δ H phi Δ H phi ( T T phi ) ]
In the equation, ΔG is the Gibbs free energy change of the reaction under actual conditions; ΔGƟ is the Gibbs free energy change of the reaction under the standard condition; R = 8.314 J/(mol·K), is the gas constant; T is the actual temperature; p Cl 2 is the partial pressure of Cl2 in the system; pƟ = 101,325 Pa, is the pressure under standard conditions; ΔHphi is the enthalpy change of the phase transition of the substance; Tphi is the temperature at which the substance undergoes phase transition, the unit is K. As shown in Table 1, the melting and boiling points (sublimation points) of the corresponding chlorides of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu are listed, respectively, at 101,325 Pa and 10 Pa. The boiling points of all the chlorides listed, except LiCl and CuCl, are reduced below their melting points at 10 Pa. This property helps to reduce the interaction of the chlorides in the molten state and facilitates the separation between them.
In order to avoid the introduction of new impurity elements, it is necessary to select suitable chlorides as the chlorinating agent in the valuable metals of the waste ternary lithium battery system. The general equation of the chlorination reaction can be described as follows:
2 x Me + Cl 2 ( g ) = MeCl x   ( Me   =   Li ,   Ni ,   Co ,   Mn ,   Al ,   Cu ;   x = 1 ,   2 ,   3 )
Using the classical thermodynamic method, the stoichiometric number 1 of Cl2(g) in the reaction equation was used as the standard to calculate the ΔG−T relationship between Li, Ni, Co, Mn, Al, Cu, and other metal elements reacting with Cl2(g). As shown in Figure 1, graph (a) lists the ΔGƟ−T relationship of each reaction under 101,325 Pa, and graph (b) lists the ΔG−T relationship under the condition of 10 Pa. Figure 1 shows the phase transition point (T), melting point (M), boiling point (B) and sublimation point (S) of each substance under different gas pressures. The boiling point of the substance changes with the pressure in the system: the decrease in pressure will greatly affect the boiling point of the substance [21]. Under 101,325 Pa, only NiCl2 sublimates at 1242.79 K; under 10 Pa, NiCl2 sublimates at 866.15 K; other substances that do not sublime under 101,325 Pa, such as CoCl2, Mn, MnCl2, MnCl3, CuCl2, etc., all have the sublimation phenomenon when the system pressure is 10 Pa. The property that the boiling point (sublimation point) of the substance decreases with the decrease in the gas pressure provides the possibility of realizing the subsequent separation and purification of chlorides in a vacuum environment.
From Figure 1a, in the listed temperature range, CuCl2 can chlorinate almost all the metal elements in the system, and AlCl3 can also chlorinate other metals with the increase in the reaction temperature [22,23]. However, considering that the subsequent reaction is carried out at a system pressure of 10 Pa, referring to Figure 1b, it is found that AlCl3 sublimates at 399.46 K, and is then evacuated from the reaction system by the vacuum system, so it cannot be used as chlorine chemical agent [24]. Since the Gibbs free energy of generating AlCl3 is small, and it is prone to sublimation under vacuum, this feature can be used to separate Al in the system [25]. In Figure 1b, the ΔG−T curves of CuCl2, NiCl2, CoCl2, and MnCl2 are almost parallel when the temperature is in the range of 298–900 K. It shows that in this interval, the temperature has a negligible effect on the thermodynamics of the chlorination reaction. However, under the condition of 10 Pa, CuCl2 decomposes at 644.79 K. In order to avoid its decomposition, the chlorination reaction temperature should be lower than this value.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Analysis of Dominant Area of Ni−Co−Mn−Li−Cl System

Firstly, the decomposition and volatilization of chlorides of the main valuable metals Ni, Co, Mn, and Li contained in waste lithium batteries were analyzed. According to Equation (2), the equilibrium diagrams of Ni−Co−Mn−Li chlorides at 10 Pa, 100 Pa and 101,325 Pa were drawn accordingly. As shown in Figure 2a–d are the equilibrium diagrams of the decomposition reactions of Ni−Cl, Co−Cl, Mn−Cl and Li−Cl systems, respectively. The red, blue, and black lines are the equilibrium lines of the chloride decomposition reaction at 10 Pa, 100 Pa and 101,325 Pa, respectively. Additionally, they are the phase transition divisions of the corresponding components. In the area above the curve, at any temperature, the actual chlorine partial pressure is higher than the equilibrium chlorine partial pressure at the same temperature on the equilibrium line, so the area above the equilibrium line is the stable area of chloride, and the bottom is the stable area of the corresponding metal. The green slashed area in the figure is the actual control area of the experiment [26]. The upper and lower limits of this area correspond to pressures of 100 Pa and 10 Pa, respectively. The boundary on the left is the temperature at which chloride decomposes to produce chlorine gas at the corresponding pressure. The boundary on the right is the temperature at which chloride sublimates or vaporizes at the corresponding pressure. In this range, chloride can be collected as a gas without decomposing Cl2 and the related metal, which is kind to both experimental equipment and the environment.
In the equilibrium diagram, the stable zone is directly related to the phase transition temperature: the left and right sides of the sublimation point are the equilibrium zones of the gas and solid phases of the substance; the melting and boiling point, the equilibrium line and the coordinate axis form the stable zone of the liquid phase. And the left and right sides of the liquid phase stable zone are the equilibrium regions of the gas phase and the solid phase, respectively. According to thermodynamic calculations, NiCl2 sublimes in the studied pressure range; CoCl2 sublimes at 10 Pa and 100 Pa; MnCl2 sublimes only at 10 Pa; and LiCl does not sublimes. The introduction of vacuum will reduce the gasification temperature of the material. Under 101,325 Pa, NiCl2, CoCl2 and MnCl2 enter the gas phase at 1242.79 K, 1371.13 K and 1510.24 K, respectively. They drop to 866.15 K, 852.13 K and 888.29 K at 10 Pa. At the same time, the vacuum reduces the decomposition temperature of chlorides. In the studied temperature range, the decomposition temperatures of NiCl2 and CoCl2 decreased from 1339.50 K and 1408.30 K at 100 Pa to 1225.15 K and 1278.75 K at 10 Pa. Moreover, the decomposition temperature of MnCl2 and LiCl at 100 Pa is beyond the research range. The decomposition occurs at 1447.15 K and 1578.52 K at 10 Pa, respectively.
Combining the green areas in Figure 2a–d into the same figure, we can obtain the control regions where Ni−Co−Mn−Li chlorides are separated one by one in gaseous form. As shown in Figure 3, the corresponding chlorides can be obtained by controlling the reaction conditions in the respective intervals from right to left.

3.2. Analysis of Dominant Area of Al−Cu−Cl System

Figure 4a,b are the equilibrium diagrams of the decomposition reactions of Al−Cl and Cu−Cl chlorides, respectively. The red, blue, and black lines in the figure represent the equilibrium line and the phase transition division of the corresponding components when the system pressure is 10 Pa, 100 Pa and 101,325 Pa, correspondingly. The green slashed area is the actual control area of the experiment. AlCl3 decomposes into Al and Cl2 at 1136.91 K; when the system pressure is 100 Pa, the decomposition temperature of AlCl3 is reduced to 758.82 K; when the system pressure is reduced to 10 Pa, the decomposition temperature of AlCl3 is further reduced to 703.74 K. Under 101,325 Pa, the melting points of CuCl, CuCl2 and Cu are 696.00 K, 871.00 K and 1357.77 K, respectively; at 100 Pa, CuCl and CuCl2 sublime at 1225.40 K and 788.48 K, respectively; at 10 Pa, the sublimation temperatures of CuCl and CuCl2 are down to 1094.66 K and 726.62 K, respectively. In the studied temperature and pressure range, CuCl2 decomposes directly from the solid phase. The decomposition temperatures are 644.79 K, 697.10 K and 888.00 K at 10 Pa, 100 Pa and 101,325 Pa, respectively. Therefore, under the reaction conditions, the system pressure and temperature cannot be changed to obtain gaseous CuCl2.
Combining the green areas in Figure 4a,b into the same figure, we can obtain the control regions where Al−Cu chlorides are separated one by one in gaseous form. As shown in Figure 5, the green and orange areas are the control areas for the gaseous separation of AlCl3 and CuCl, respectively. The reaction conditions are controlled in their respective intervals from right to left, and the corresponding chlorides can be separated from the mixture. It should be noted that, in order to prevent CuCl2 in the system from decomposing Cl2, the left boundary of the AlCl3 control zone corresponds to the temperature at which the decomposition reaction of CuCl2 occurs. Vacuum does not directly affect the equilibrium region of solid and liquid substances but has a more profound impact on the equilibrium region of gaseous substances. Under 101,325 Pa, the ΔGƟ of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu series chloride gasification is inversely proportional to the temperature T, and lg( p Cl 2 /pƟ) ≡ 0 in Equation (2) will not affect the value of ΔGƟ; In a vacuum environment, where lg( p Cl 2 /pƟ) < 0, ΔG is reduced to 0 more quickly, thereby reducing the boiling point of the substance and increasing the gas phase stability zone. If the boiling point is still higher than the melting point after reduction, the liquid−phase stable region will decrease, and the solid−phase stable region will remain unchanged. If the boiling point drops below the melting point, the substance skips the melting process at the corresponding boiling point temperature and sublimates directly. At this time, the liquid phase stable area disappears, and the solid phase stable area decreases.
It has been discussed in Figure 4b that CuCl2 will not produce CuCl2(g) under the pressure of 10–100 Pa but will decompose into CuCl and Cl2(g). As shown in Figure 6, the content of each species at the equilibrium temperature at 10 Pa (Figure 6a) and the ΔG of possible chemical reactions at the corresponding temperatures (644.79 K and 1094.66 K) were discussed separately (Figure 6b). 1 mol CuCl2 was put into the system, and the pressure was set to 10 Pa to ensure that all gas−phase components generated during the reaction were extracted. When the temperature is lower than 644.79 K, the decomposition temperature of CuCl2 is not reached, and the system remains in its initial state. When the temperature reaches 644.79 K, CuCl2 is decomposed into CuCl and Cl2(g) (Equation (4)), the generated Cl2(g) is extracted from the system, and CuCl2 is almost completely converted into CuCl. Although the sublimation temperature of CuCl2 at 10 Pa (726.62 K) has not been achieved at this time, the sublimation of CuCl2 still occurs (Equation (5)), so the total amount of CuCl decomposed is slightly less than 1 mol. When the temperature was elevated to 1094.66 K, CuCl(l) boiled and entered the gas phase (Equation (6)). At the same time, since a large amount of CuCl(g) is contained in the gas phase at this time, a small part of CuCl(g) undergoes a disproportionation reaction before leaving the system to form CuCl2(g) and Cu (Equation (7)).
CuCl2 = CuCl2(g)
2CuCl2 = 2CuCl + Cl2(g)
CuCl = CuCl(g)
2CuCl(g) = CuCl2(g) + Cu

4. Conclusions

In this study, based on the thermodynamic theory of chlorination reactions, the feasibility of chlorinating the valuable metals Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu in spent lithium−ion battery systems was analyzed from a computational point of view, and the vacuum volatilization separation conditions for each chlorination product were deduced. Without introducing additional impurities, CuCl2 has good chlorination capacity and can be used as a suitable chlorinating agent. Keeping the system pressure at 10 Pa, CoCl2, NiCl2, MnCl2 and LiCl in the gas phase were obtained when temperatures reached 852.13 K, 866.15 K, 888.29 K and 996.78 K, respectively. The impurity element Al in the reaction system escapes from the system as AlCl3 at 399.46 K and does not affect the subsequent vacuum volatilization of the valuable metal; the impurity element Cu is mainly converted to CuCl, which is stable under vacuum conditions and does not volatilize into the gas phase until 1094.66 K.
The process enables the chlorination and vacuum volatilization of valuable metals from lithium−ion battery cathode scrap and can be combined with a pyrotechnic pretreatment process for the chlorination and removal of impurity elements. The process helps to shorten the existing recycling process of used lithium−ion batteries, making it possible to recover and separate the valuable metals Ni, Co, Mn, and Li in a single step. At the same time, the chlorination separation process under vacuum conditions provides a solution for the separation and enrichment of valuable metals from low−grade hard−to−enrich minerals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L. and G.H.; methodology, W.L., J.D. and J.W.; validation, W.L., G.H. and J.D.; formal analysis, W.L. and G.H.; resources, J.D. and J.W.; funding acquisition, J.W. and W.M.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L.; writing—review and editing, W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Candidate Talent Training Program of Yunnan Province (grant number 202005AC160041), Kunming University of Science and Technology Student Extracurricular Academic Science and Technology Innovation Fund (grant number 2022KJ194 and 2022ZK106).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chu, H.; Lie, J.; Liu, J. Rapid Leaching of Valuable Metals from Spent Lithium−Ion Batteries with Microwave Irradiation Using Organic and Inorganic Acid. J. Sustain. Metall. 2021, 7, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jung, J.C.; Sui, P.; Zhang, J. A review of recycling spent lithium−ion battery cathode materials using hydrometallurgical treatments. J. Energy Storage 2021, 35, 102217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fu, Y.P.; He, Y.Q.; Chen, H.C.; Ye, C.L.; Lu, Q.C.; Li, R.N.; Xie, W.N.; Wang, J. Effective leaching and extraction of valuable metals from electrode material of spent lithium−ion batteries using mixed organic acids leachant. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 79, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, Q.Q.; Chen, L.L.; Li, X.W.; Chao, Y.H.; Sun, J.; Ji, H.Y.; Zhu, W.S. Sustainable and Convenient Recovery of Valuable Metals from Spent Li−Ion Batteries by a One−Pot Extraction Process. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 13851–13861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gu, S.; Zhang, L.; Fu, B.T.; Wang, X.P.; Ahn, J.W. Feasible route for the recovery of strategic metals from mixed lithium−ion batteries cathode materials by precipitation and carbonation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qiu, R.J.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, J.Y.; Song, Q.B.; Ruan, J.J.; Tang, Y.T.; Qiu, R.L. Energy models and the process of fluid−magnetic separation for recovering cobalt micro−particles from vacuum reduction products of spent lithium ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kurashima, K.; Kumagai, S.; Kameda, T.; Saito, Y.; Yoshioka, T. Heavy metal removal from municipal solid waste fly ash through chloride volatilization using poly(vinyl chloride) as chlorinating agent. J. Mater. Cycles Waste 2020, 22, 1270–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kurashima, K.; Matsuda, K.; Kumagai, S.; Kameda, T.; Saito, Y.; Yoshioka, T. A combined kinetic and thermodynamic approach for interpreting the complex interactions during chloride volatilization of heavy metals in municipal solid waste fly ash. Waste Manag. 2019, 87, 204–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hong, Y.X.; Ning, X.A.; Lu, X.W.; Li, Y.; Lai, X.J.; Zeng, J.; Chen, C.H. Effect of chlorine on the volatilization of heavy metals by roasting iron tailings. China Environ. Sci. 2020, 40, 2276–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shen, W.Q.; Zhu, N.W.; Xi, Y.H.; Huang, J.L.; Li, F.; Wu, P.X.; Dang, Z. Effects of medical waste incineration fly ash on the promotion of heavy metal chlorination volatilization from incineration residues. J. Haz. Mat. 2021, 425, 128037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Okabe, P.; Rappleye, D.; Newton, M.; Simpson, M.F. Development of metallic nuclear material purification process via simultaneous chlorination and volatilization. J. Nucl. Mater. 2021, 543, 152626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grause, G.; Yamamoto, N.; Kameda, T.; Yoshioka, T. Removal of lead from cathode ray tube funnel glass by chloride volatilization. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, J.Y.; Sun, S.Y. Chlorination Transformation and Volatilization of Heavy Metals in Fly Ash from the Incineration during the Disposal Process with Higher Temperature. Environ. Sci. 2012, 33, 3279–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, K.; Jiao, F.; Li, W.; Liu, W.; Qin, W.Q.; Yang, C.R. Using Magnesium Chloride to Volatilize Impurity Metals from Waste Magnesia−Chromium Refractories. JOM 2022, 74, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, G.C.; Hu, N.X.; Wu, J.J.; Ma, W.H. Research progress in recovery of valuable metals in cathode materials for lithium−ion batteries. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met. 2021, 31, 3320–3343. [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, Y.; Shao, P.H.; Yang, L.M.; Zheng, Y.F.; Sun, Z.; Fang, L.L.; Lv, W.G.; Yao, Z.W.; Wang, L.H.; Luo, X.B. Thermochemically driven crystal phase transfer via chlorination roasting toward the selective extraction of lithium from spent LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 174, 105757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, S.R.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, W.S. Effects of chlorine on the volatilization of heavy metals during the co−combustion of sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 2017, 62, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Winkel, S.; Scheunis, L.; Verhaeghe, F.; Blanpain, B.; Malfliet, A. Chlorine Addition to Existing Zinc Fuming Processes: A Thermodynamic Study. J. Sustain. Metall. 2020, 5, 538–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kameda, T.; Fukushima, S.; Grause, G.; Yoshioka, T. Metal recovery from wire scrap via a chloride volatilization process: Poly(vinyl chloride) derived chlorine as volatilization agent. Thermochim. Acta 2013, 562, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khan, M.N.; Tlili, I. Innovative thermodynamic parametric investigation of gas and steam bottoming cycles with heat exchanger and heat recovery steam generator: Energy and exergy analysis. Energy Rep. 2018, 4, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Wei, D.X.; Han, J.H.; Xia, Y.J.; Jiang, J.; Zhong, M.W.; Hirata, A.; Watanabe, K. Vapor phase dealloying kinetics of MnZn alloys. ACTA Mater. 2021, 212, 116916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xing, Z.X.; Cheng, G.J.; Yang, H.; Xue, X.X.; Jiang, P.G. Mechanism and application of the ore with chlorination treatment: A review. Miner. Eng. 2020, 154, 106404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, L.; Zhang, T.A.; Lv, G.Z.; Zhang, J.Z.; Dou, Z.H.; Zhang, W.G.; Pan, X.J.; Wang, Y.X. Thermodynamics Analysis on Process of Pelletizing Chlorination of Fly Ash. In Light Metals 2018; Minerals Metals & Materials, Series, Martin, O., Eds.; Springer: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2018; pp. 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, Q.C.; Wang, P.Y.; Yang, B.; Cui, C.L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C. Carbothermic Reduction and Chlorination of Alumina with Coal in Vacuum. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 443–444, 862–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, W.Z.; Yang, B.; Zhu, F.L.; Jiang, W.L.; Yu, Q.C.; Xu, B.Q. Investigation of chlorination process in aluminum production by carbothermic−chlorination reduction of Al2O3 under vacuum. Vacuum 2012, 86, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moodley, S.; Eric, R.H.; Kucukkaragoz, C.; Kale, A. Chlorination of Titania Feedstocks; Jiang, T., Hwang, J., Masset, P., Yucel, o., Padilla, R., Zhou, G., Eds.; Wiley: Orlando, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 93–104. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. ΔG−T relationship between Li, Ni, Co, Mn, Al, Cu, and other metal elements reacted with Cl2(g): (a) 101,325 Pa; (b) 10 Pa.
Figure 1. ΔG−T relationship between Li, Ni, Co, Mn, Al, Cu, and other metal elements reacted with Cl2(g): (a) 101,325 Pa; (b) 10 Pa.
Metals 12 02183 g001
Figure 2. Equilibrium diagram of chloride decomposition reaction: (a) Ni−Cl system; (b) Co−Cl system; (c) Mn−Cl system; (d) Li−Cl system.
Figure 2. Equilibrium diagram of chloride decomposition reaction: (a) Ni−Cl system; (b) Co−Cl system; (c) Mn−Cl system; (d) Li−Cl system.
Metals 12 02183 g002
Figure 3. Ni−Co−Mn−Li chloride gaseous separation control area.
Figure 3. Ni−Co−Mn−Li chloride gaseous separation control area.
Metals 12 02183 g003
Figure 4. Equilibrium diagram of chloride decomposition reaction: (a) Al−Cl system; (b) Cu−Cl system.
Figure 4. Equilibrium diagram of chloride decomposition reaction: (a) Al−Cl system; (b) Cu−Cl system.
Metals 12 02183 g004
Figure 5. Al−Cu chloride gaseous separation control area.
Figure 5. Al−Cu chloride gaseous separation control area.
Metals 12 02183 g005
Figure 6. (a) 10 Pa, the content of each species at equilibrium temperature (b) ΔG−T diagram of possible chemical reactions during the vacuum decomposition of CuCl2 system.
Figure 6. (a) 10 Pa, the content of each species at equilibrium temperature (b) ΔG−T diagram of possible chemical reactions during the vacuum decomposition of CuCl2 system.
Metals 12 02183 g006
Table 1. Melting and boiling points (sublimation points) of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu corresponding chlorides at 101325 Pa and 10 Pa.
Table 1. Melting and boiling points (sublimation points) of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu corresponding chlorides at 101325 Pa and 10 Pa.
ChlorideMelting Point (K)Boiling Point (K)
101,325 Pa10 Pa
LiCl883.001701.55996.78
NiCl21304.001242.79 *866.15 *
CoCl21010.001371.13852.13 *
MnCl2923.001510.24888.29 *
MnCl3860.00953.96630.15 *
AlCl3465.70623.74399.46 *
CuCl696.001950.801094.66
CuCl2871.001094.04726.62 *
* Sublimation Point.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, W.; Hu, G.; Ding, J.; Wu, J.; Ma, W. Thermodynamics of Vacuum Chloride Volatilization of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu in Spent Lithium−Ion Battery. Metals 2022, 12, 2183. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122183

AMA Style

Luo W, Hu G, Ding J, Wu J, Ma W. Thermodynamics of Vacuum Chloride Volatilization of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu in Spent Lithium−Ion Battery. Metals. 2022; 12(12):2183. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Wen, Guochen Hu, Junshuai Ding, Jijun Wu, and Wenhui Ma. 2022. "Thermodynamics of Vacuum Chloride Volatilization of Ni, Co, Mn, Li, Al, and Cu in Spent Lithium−Ion Battery" Metals 12, no. 12: 2183. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop