Next Article in Journal
The Anisotropic Stress-Induced Diffusion and Trapping of Nitrogen in Austenitic Stainless Steel during Nitriding
Previous Article in Journal
Deformation Behavior Causing Excessive Thinning of Outer Diameter of Micro Metal Tubes in Hollow Sinking
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of a High-Alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy by Ce Addition and Aging Treatment

1
Laboratory of Advanced Light Alloy Materials and Devices, Postdoctoral Workstation of Nanshan Group Co., Ltd., Yantai Nanshan University, Longkou 265713, China
2
School of Materials & Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
3
Hang Xin Material Technology Co. Ltd., Longkou 264006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2020, 10(10), 1318; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101318
Submission received: 19 August 2020 / Revised: 19 September 2020 / Accepted: 24 September 2020 / Published: 1 October 2020

Abstract

:
The corrosion resistance (exfoliation corrosion and inter-granular corrosion) and mechanical properties (strength and hardness) of a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr alloy were improved by the synergistic effect of Ce addition and aging treatment. Ce addition promotes the morphology change of grain boundary precipitates from continuous form to discontinuous form at T6 temper. But the Cu content in grain boundary precipitates became much lower than that in Ce-free alloy, owing to a large amount of Cu being trapped in AlCuCe phase. Hence retrogression and re-aging (RRA) treatment were then adopted. The Cu content in grain boundary precipitates was improved, which can be attributed to the removal of Cu from solid solution during high temperature aging and its subsequent incorporation into grain boundary precipitates. In addition, the size and the distribution discontinuity of the grain boundary precipitates can be further increased and the main intra-grain phases of RRA alloy are still fine η′ phase similar to T6 temper. Therefore, the alloy at RRA temper obtains the optimal corrosion resistance without loss of high strength.

1. Introduction

Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy have been extensively used in aerospace applications due to its excellent specific strength [1,2]. With the increasing demands for superior strength, development of these alloys tends to high-alloying for the enrichment of precipitations [3]. However, increased Zn and Mg content would greatly reduce the corrosion resistance of these alloys [4,5]. For instance, high strength can be easily obtained in T6 peak-aged temper, but the corrosion performance is greatly weakened [6]. Even though the corrosion resistance can be increased on T7x over-aged temper, the trade-off is to sacrifice 10–15% strength [7].
At present, extensive attempts have been made to obtain the combination of high strength and favorable corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Based on breaking the continuity and increasing the inter-precipitate distance along grain boundaries, and maintaining microstructures consisted of fine precipitates within the grains at the same time, a series of aging treatment are being conducted, such as the retrogression and re-aging (RRA) [11], non-isothermal ageing (NIA) [12], and high temperature pre-precipitation heat treatments (HTPP) [13] etc. Inhibiting recrystallization is also beneficial to improve the corrosion resistance and strength of the Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys by increasing the proportion of low angle grain boundaries, as there is no obvious precipitates free zone (PFZ) formed at sub-grain boundaries and fine-grain strengthening, etc. [14,15]. In addition, higher copper content in the grain boundary phase can also contribute to the improvement of corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys [16]. In particular, the chemical composition of precipitates can affect the anodic polarization behavior because the alloy element Cu can shift the corrosion potential to the noble direction [17]. Therefore, we can consider using the synergistic effect of microalloying and heat treatment to achieve the effective control of the microstructures mentioned above.
Ce addition in Al alloy can promote the surface Al2O3 film to be transformed to Ce oxide film in corrosive environments, which has better corrosion inhibition effect than other rare earth oxides such as La2O3, Nd2O3, Pr2O3, Y2O3, etc. [18]. Besides, Ce addition also modifies the intra-grain precipitate shape from spherical to needle-like in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys and improves the tensile strength by about 10% [19]. Moreover, improved recrystallization resistance of Al-Cu-Li-Zr alloy through Ce addition has been observed [20]. Ce easily interacts with other elements in the alloy to form intermetallic species [21], which would change the chemical composition and morphology of grain boundary precipitates, thus affecting the corrosion properties of the alloy. Therefore, the addition of small amounts of Ce in a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy can be used as a method to improve the corrosion resistance and strength simultaneously.
Nevertheless, so far there is little information available in the literature about the corrosion performance and mechanical properties of a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr-Ce alloy. The purpose of the article is to investigate the effect of Ce addition and aging treatment on the microstructure, inter-granular corrosion, exfoliation corrosion and strength of a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr alloy.

2. Materials and Methods

Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr (Ce-free alloy) and Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr-Ce (Ce-containing alloy) alloys were prepared by a casting metallurgy method. Industrial high purity Al (99.87 wt%), Mg (99.92 wt%) and Zn (99.94 wt%), and Al-Cu (51.51 wt%), Al-Zr (3.29 wt%), and Al-Ce (10.01 wt%) master alloys were taken as the starting raw materials. The experimental alloys were melted by induction heating, and then cast into Cu moulds to produce billets with 190 mm in length, 130 mm in width and 24 mm in thickness. The composition measured by means of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) method using a BAIRD PS-6 instrument (Thermo Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA) is shown in Table 1.
The as-cast ingots were homogenized at 435 °C for 8 h and 470 °C for 32 h (H), followed by air cooling to room temperature. The ingots were converted into plates of 4.5 mm in thickness by hot rolling at 400–450 °C. The hot-rolled plates were held at 430 °C for 1.5 h and then cooled to room in the furnace. Finally, these plates were cold rolled to a thickness of approximately 2.2 mm. The solid solution treatments were performed at 450 °C for 50 min and subsequently 485 °C for 30 min (SS) in a salt bath furnace with an accuracy of ±2 °C. The samples were water-quenched at room temperature. At last, the experimental alloy went through a series of aging treatment: the peak-aging which means being artificially aged at 120 °C for 24 h (T6); the over-aging, which means being artificially aged at 120 °C for 24 h, followed by high temperature 160 °C for 8 h (T7); and the RRA which means being treated at 120 °C for 24 h, followed by retrogression process at 190 °C for 1 h, and then being artificially aged at 120 °C for 24 h. The heat treatment procedures applied in this study have been separately given in the Table 2.
Tensile tests were performed at a loading speed of 2 mm/min with an Instron3369 machine (INSTRON, Boston, MA, USA). The accelerated intergranular corrosion (IGC) testing was performed in an aqueous solution consisting of 30 g/L NaCl and 10 mL/L HCl (PH:0.85) at 35 ± 1 °C, according to the IGC test standard of GB7998-2005 [22]. Exfoliation corrosion testing (EXCO-testing) was carried out in an aqueous solution consisting of 234 g/L NaCl, 50 g/L KNO3 and 6.5 mL/L HNO3 (PH:0.4) at 25 ± 2 °C, according to the Chinese HB5455-90 specification [22].
Effect of Ce addition on recrystallization inhibition during solid solution treatment was observed by optical microscopy under polarized light and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD, FEI-Nova Nano SEM 450, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The gathered EBSD data were analyzed using TSL OIM Analysis 7 software (EDAX Inc., Mahwah, NJ, USA). In order to clarify the dissolution of intermetallic phases during solid solution, the sample before solid solution was performed by using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, DSC1/700, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA, JXA-8230, JEOL Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and/or scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI-Nova-Nano SEM450, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to characterize the segregation of the main element in Ce-enrichment phase after homogenization and solid solution respectively. The phases of the Ce-containing alloy after homogenization and solid solution were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku D/max-2400, Ultima IV, Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Conductivity test was carried out on a SIGMATEST 2069 eddy current conductivity meter (Institut Dr. Foerster GmbH & Co. KG, Reutlingen, Germany). The samples were processed into 30 mm × 30 mm × 2 mm blocks. The conductivity of the alloy was characterized by international annealed copper standard (IACS). The experimental results were converted into % IACS value. The distribution of precipitates along grain/sub-grain boundaries and in grain was analyzed on a JEOL-2100F transmission electron microscopy (STEM) system (JEOL Corp., Tokyo, Japan). In order to study the change in chemical composition of grain boundary phase, elemental mapping was also conducted by using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurements (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The existing form of Ce and its influence on the segregation of other main elements after homogenization (H) and solid solution treatment (SS) in Ce-containing alloy are shown in Figure 1. The elements mappings of Al, Cu, Ce, Zn and Mg are observed after homogenization (Figure 1a). Cu segregates with Zn, Ce or Mg at dendrite boundaries. The Cu atoms fixed in the insoluble Ce-containing phase or CuMg phase in dendritic interface after homogenization are seriously deficient in dendritic matrix according to the Cu mapping. On the contrary, more Zn and Mg atoms solubilize in dendritic matrix. To be more specific, the chemical composition of the bright phase marked as A, dark phase marked as B and matrix Al marked as C in Figure 1a are presented in Table 3 by using quantitative X-ray wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) analysis. According to the XRD analysis results in Figure 2, the main phases after homogenization are Al8Cu4Ce and Al2CuMg, so the bright phase enrichment with Cu, Ce and Zn is an insoluble Al8Cu4Ce phase with some Zn dissolved in it [23,24]. The dark intermetallic phases enrichment with Cu and Mg are thought to be the Al2CuMg phase because the Cu to Mg ratio is close to 1:1 in this phase [25]. Cu is mainly locked by Al8Cu4Ce and Al2CuMg phases which are insoluble during homogenization with the upper temperature of 470 °C, while only the fine residual phase distributing along rolling streamline is observed after rolling and solid solution treatment (Figure 1b). These fine residual phases are only Al8Cu4Ce without Zn in it according to EDS (Figure 1a) and XRD results (Figure 2). Therefore, it can be inferred that Zn originally trapped in crushed Al8Cu4Ce phase is also diffused into the matrix and the Al2CuMg particles are almost completely dissolved due to the ultrahigh solid solution temperature at 485 °C and being smashed during the severe rolling process. These results are also well confirmed by DSC plots before and after solid solution treatment in Figure 3. Two endothermic peaks, sited at 477.9 °C and 498.4 °C respectively, are observed before solid solution. The endothermic peak at 477.9 °C is mainly attributed to the melting of T(Mg32(Al,Zn)49) phase [26]. The endothermic peak at 498.4 °C attributed to the dissolution of Al2CuMg phase [25] is nearly eliminated after solid solution treatment. Yet some Cu atoms are still locked by the insoluble Al8Cu4Ce phase, so it is difficult for them to get into the super-saturated solid solution, let alone subsequently precipitate from it and then diffuse to the precipitates in the grain and grain boundaries during aging.
The recrystallization degree of the Ce-free and Ce-containing alloys after solid solution treatment (SS) is illustrated in Figure 4. Although almost complete recrystallization can be observed in Ce-free alloy (Figure 4a), there are still large areas of unrecrystallized or fiber grain structures in local area of the Ce-containing alloy even when the solid solution temperature is up to 485 °C (Figure 4b). In addition, grain orientation in Ce-containing can be clearly observed by using EBSD, as shown in Figure 4c,d. A considerable amount of partial recrystallization zone, which consists of subgrains with a high proportion of low-angle grain boundaries, clearly remained. Accordingly, a large number of low angle grain boundaries in fine grain are also observed by TEM (Figure 4e). Small Ce addition can inhibit recrystallization of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy during solid solution and improve the proportion of low angle grain boundary. Similar results have also been found in Al-Cu-Li-Zr alloy by Ce addition [20]. Because a large number of spherical Al8Cu4Ce phases tend to form in the Al3Zr dispersoid-free bands owing to the opposite microsegregation patterns of Ce and Zr in Al alloy. Even nano-scaled AlCuCe dispersoids showing high-temperature stability have been observed in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr-Ce alloy in our previous work [22]. So uniform coverage of dispersoids achieved through joint addition of Zr and Ce in Al alloy can inhibit recrystallization and improve the proportion of low angle grain boundary.
The precipitates distributed along the grain and/or subgrain boundaries at different aging treatment of the experimental alloys are shown in Figure 5. Equilibrium small η (MgZn2) phases with a hexagonal lattice [27] in Ce-free alloy at T6 temper are distributed on the grain boundaries continuously and close to each other, as shown in Figure 5a, while discontinuous grain boundary phase characteristics are observed on both grain boundaries and subgrain boundaries in Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper (Figure 5c,d). In addition, there are no obvious precipitates free zone (PFZ) formed on both grain boundaries and subgrain boundaries. Small Ce addition can lead to more obvious discontinuity of precipitates at grain boundaries. This phenomenon has also been found in other Ce additional Al alloys [19]. Then the T6 temper sample was further aged at higher temperature 160 °C for 8 h and the over aging state T7 temper was obtained. The results show that the grain boundary precipitates of the Ce-containing alloy is sparse and extremely coarsen (size: 30–40 nm), and the width of the precipitated zone (PFZ) is increased to 30–50 nm (Figure 5e). It is noted that even though sufficient element diffusion occurs at T7 temper, the Cu content of the grain boundary precipitated phase in the Ce-containing alloy is still much lower than that in the Ce-free alloy at T6 temper, as shown in Figure 5b,f.
To obtain both high strength and good corrosion resistance at the same time, a retrogression and re-ageing (RRA) treatment was carried out. The microstructures consist of relatively coarser precipitates distributed discontinuously on the grain boundaries (size: 20–30 nm, interparticle spacing: 20–45 nm) and fine precipitates within the grains. Although the interspace and size of precipitates at grain boundaries are smaller than those of T7 state, the relative Cu content of precipitated phase in grain boundary increases obviously (Figure 5h). These results can be attributed to the removal of Cu from solid solution during high temperature aging and its subsequent incorporation into grain boundary phase at RRA temper [17]. In addition, the chemical composition of the grain boundary phase marked as A in Figure 4a, marked as B in Figure 5e and marked as C in Figure 5g are presented in Table 4 by using STEM-EDS analysis. The Cu content of grain boundary precipitate in Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper is increased to be close to that of Ce-free alloy after short-time high-temperature aging.
The maximum depth of attack on the experimental alloy in the IGC test for 24 h is illustrated in Figure 6. The maximum depth of attack for T6 temper is 290.82 µm in Ce-free alloy (Figure 6a). For Ce-containing alloy, it can be seen that the maximum depth of attack for T6 temper is slightly reduced to 234.69 µm (Figure 6b), while the maximum depth of attack for T7 and RRA temper is only 81.63 µm and 100.01 µm respectively (Figure 6c,d). Although the inter-granular corrosion attack was retarded due to Ce addition, the corrosion resistance property still needs, to a large extent, to be optimized through T7 and RRA aging treatment. Results of EXCO evaluations after being exposed for 12 h are showed in Figure 7. The corrosion pattern on the surface of alloy changed from the EC (Exfoliation) state (notable layering and intense penetration into the metal) in Ce-free alloy to the EA (Exfoliation) state (slight layering and penetration into the metal) in the Ce-containing alloy. Moreover, the corrosion pattern changed from EA to PC (Pitting) state (superficial pitting and slight penetration into the metal) when the Ce-containing alloy was treated at T7 and RRA temper. The corrosion resistance (exfoliation corrosion and inter-granular corrosion) of a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr alloy was improved by the synergistic effect of Ce addition and aging treatment.
The mechanical properties and conductivity of the Ce-containing alloy at T6, T7 and RRA temper are shown in Figure 8. It can be seen that the ultimate strength (UTS), 0.2% yield strength (YS) and hardness of the alloy with RRA are similar to those of T6 temper, and do not decline obviously. The electrical conductivity varies with precipitate size of Al alloy, which has an effect on the chemical potential between intra-grain/grain boundary phases, and corrosion channels along grain boundaries.
Therefore, to some extent, the electrical conductivity can reflect corrosion resistance of the alloy in different heat treatment states [28]. The electrical conductivity of alloy at T6 temper is the lowest, which is 31.6% IACS, and its corrosion resistance is the worst. After T7 and RRA heat treatment, the electrical conductivity of the alloy increases significantly to more than 40% IACS, and the corrosion resistance is significantly improved. The degree of recrystallization and grain boundary precipitation characteristics are the main factors that affect the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys [2,6]. The morphology and distribution of grain boundary precipitates can be easily affected by Ce addition and aging process, and hence the corrosion properties can be changed. Compared with Ce-free alloy at T6 temper, a considerable amount of partial recrystallization zone and more discontinuous grain boundary phase characteristics on both grain and subgrain boundaries in Ce-containing alloy are observed, but the Cu content of the grain boundary precipitated phase becomes lower. Because the unique electrochemical behaviour of η phase (MgZn2) has been determined to be such that when η phase is present in an Al alloy, η phase is polarised anodically, hence preferentially dissolving in aqueous electrolytes [29,30]. The substitution of Zn with of Cu in η phase minimises the extent of anodic polarisation of η phase, owing to a decreased electrochemical potential difference between the Cu-containing η phase and the alloy matrix [29,31]. Therefore, the enhancement of corrosion resistance such as IGC and EXCO is inadequate. After over aging and regression and re-aging treatment, the grain boundary precipitates coarsen and the spacing increases significantly. Especially, the Cu content of grain boundary precipitate is increased after short-time high-temperature aging at RRA temper. Hence the parameters of IGC (the maximum depth of attack from 290.82 µm to 100.01 µm) and EXCO (pattern changed from EC to PC) are significantly improved, which indicates the significant corrosion resistance improvement of the Ce-containing alloy at RRA.
The main strengthening mechanism of the experimental alloys was precipitates. The movement of the dislocations could be effectively blocked by the precipitates and the strain field around the precipitates.
Figure 9 shows the intragrain precipitates and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of the Ce-containing alloy at various aging tempers. Figure 9a,b show that the main strengthening phases of the alloy at T6 temper are coherent GP zone and fine semi coherent η′(MgZn2) phase with a metastable hexagonal lattice [27], only 2–5 nm. At this time, the shear stress increment is positively correlated with the volume fraction and the radius of the precipitates [28], which means, the strengthening effect can be enhanced by increasing the radius of GP zone and fine η′ phase until peak aging. So, the strength of the Ce-containing alloy at T6 peak-aged temper reaches its maximum at the peak aging (σb: 653 MPa, σ0.2: 611 MPa, δ: 10% and HV0.5: 207).
However, as the aging degree goes any further, the main precipitate size grows larger and more and more η′ phase is transformed into extreme coarsening equilibrium η phase (size: 14–26 nm), as shown in Figure 9c,d. At this time, the interaction between dislocations and strengthening phases is dominated by bypass mechanism [28]. That is to say, the strength of the alloy will decrease rapidly with the increase of the precipitate size. Therefore, the strength (σb: 588 MPa, σ0.2: 541 MPa, δ: 12% and HV0.5:183.7) of the alloy decreases sharply to 588 MPa due to the aggregation and growth of precipitates, and the dissolution of a small amount of unstable η′ phase during over aging at T7 temper. For the RRA temper, the fine precipitates (size: 5–10 nm) distributed homogenously within the matrix and the main strengthening phases of RRA alloy are fine η′ phase and only a small amount of η phase (Figure 9e,f), which is basically similar to that of T6 temper alloy, and thus also has high strength (σb: 640 MPa, σ0.2: 598 MPa, δ: 12% and HV0.5:203). Therefore, the alloy at RRA temper obtains the optimal corrosion resistance without the loss of high strength.

4. Conclusions

Enhancing corrosion resistance and mechanical properties in a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr alloy by Ce addition and RRA treatment was investigated. Ce addition can enhance the proportion of low angle grain boundaries and promote the morphology of grain boundary precipitates to change from continuous to discontinuous at T6 temper. Additional aging treatment as retrogression and re-aging (RRA) was adopted, the size and the distribution discontinuity of the grain boundary precipitates were further increased, and the Cu content in grain boundary precipitates was obviously improved. In addition, the main strengthening phases of RRA alloy are fine η′phase, similar to that of T6 temper. Therefore, the optimal corrosion resistance without the loss of high strength is obtained in a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr by Ce addition and RRA treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y.; methodology, X.S. and H.D.; validation, X.Y.; investigation, X.D.; resources, C.L. and J.Z.; data curation, Z.Z. and D.S.; writing—original draft, X.Y.; supervision, X.Y.; project administration, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number 2020M671987 and Longkou science and technology research and development plan project, grant number 2019KJJH021.

Acknowledgments

This research study was supported by Yantai double hundred talent plan 2019, 2020 Yantai University and local integration project (platform creation), Post doctoral innovation project of Shandong Province in 2020 and doctoral fund of Yantai Nanshan University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Williams, J.C.; A Starke, E. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems11The Golden Jubilee Issue—Selected topics in Materials Science and Engineering: Past, Present and Future, edited by S. Suresh. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 5775–5799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yuan, D.; Chen, K.; Chen, S.; Zhou, L.; Chang, J.; Huang, L.; Yi, Y. Enhancing stress corrosion cracking resistance of low Cu-containing Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys by slow quench rate. Mater. Des. 2019, 164, 107558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Wen, K.; Xiong, B.; Li, Z.; Yan, L.; Yan, H.; Liu, H.; Li, Y. Effect of recrystallization on plasticity, fracture toughness and stress corrosion cracking of a high-alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Mater. Lett. 2020, 275, 128074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, J.-T.; Zhang, Y.-A.; Li, X.-W.; Li, Z.-H.; Xiong, B.Q.; Zhang, J.-S. Thermodynamic calculation of high zinc-containing Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 1481–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dursun, T.; Soutis, C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.; Deng, Y.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J. Effect of gradient grain structures on corrosion resistance of extruded Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 832, 154911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chemingui, M.; Khitouni, M.; Jozwiak, K.; Mesmacque, G.; Kolsi, A. Characterization of the mechanical properties changes in an Al-Zn-Mg alloy after a two-step ageing treatment at 70 °C and 135 °C. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 3134–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.; Ni, D.; Ma, Z. Effect of pre-strain and two-step aging on microstructure and stress corrosion cracking of 7050 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 494, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, G.; Chen, K.; Chen, S.; Fang, H. Influence of repetitious-RRA treatment on the strength and SCC resistance of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 4014–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, Y.-P.; Pan, Q.-L.; Li, W.-B.; Liu, X.-Y.; He, Y. Influence of retrogression and re-aging treatment on corrosion behaviour of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 2149–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reda, Y.; Abdel-Karim, R.; El Mahallawi, I. Improvements in mechanical and stress corrosion cracking properties in Al-alloy 7075 via retrogression and reaging. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 485, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, D.; Liu, Y.; Liang, S.; Xie, W. The effects of non-isothermal aging on the strength and corrosion behavior of Al Zn Mg Cu alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 681, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, L.; Chen, K.; Li, S. Influence of grain-boundary pre-precipitation and corrosion characteristics of inter-granular phases on corrosion behaviors of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2012, 177, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, Y.; Yin, Z.; Zhao, K.; Duan, J.; Hu, J.; He, Z. Effects of Sc and Zr microalloying additions and aging time at 120 °C on the corrosion behaviour of an Al–Zn–Mg alloy. Corros. Sci. 2012, 65, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, Y.; Pan, Q.; Li, M.; Huang, X.; Li, B. Effect of Sc and Zr additions on corrosion behaviour of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 612, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meng, Q.; Frankel, G.S. Effect of Cu Content on Corrosion Behavior of 7xxx Series Aluminum Alloys. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, B271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, S.; Chen, K.; Peng, G.; Jia, L.; Dong, P. Effect of heat treatment on strength, exfoliation corrosion and electrochemical behavior of 7085 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 2012, 35, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arnott, D.R.; Hinton, B.R.W.; Ryan, N.E. Cationic-Film-Forming Inhibitors for the Protection of the AA 7075 Aluminum Alloy Against Corrosion in Aqueous Chloride Solution. Corros. Sci. 1989, 45, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chaubey, A.K.; Mohapatra, S.; Jayasankar, K.; Pradhan, S.K.; Satpati, B.; Sahay, S.S.; Mishra, B.K.; Mukherjee, P.S. Effect of cerium addition on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2009, 62, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, X.; Dai, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, C.; Liu, W. Improved Recrystallization Resistance of Al–Cu–Li–Zr Alloy through Ce Addition. Metals 2018, 8, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bo, H.; Jin, S.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Liu, L.; Zheng, F.; Jin, Z. Thermodynamic assessment of Al–Ce–Cu system. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 484, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fang, H.; Chao, H.; Chen, K. Effect of recrystallization on intergranular fracture and corrosion of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu–Zr alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 622, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, X.; Sun, J.; Li, Z.; Dai, H.; Fang, H.-J.; Zhao, J.; Yin, D.-F. Solidification behavior and elimination of undissolved Al2CuMg phase during homogenization in Ce-modified Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Rare Met. 2018, 39, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Shi, D.; Dai, H.; Sun, J.; Dong, X. Enhanced High-Temperature Mechanical Properties of Al⁻Cu⁻Li Alloy through T1 Coarsening Inhibition and Ce-Containing Intermetallic Refinement. Materials 2019, 12, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Deng, Y.; Yin, Z.; Cong, F. Intermetallic phase evolution of 7050 aluminum alloy during homogenization. Intermetallics 2012, 26, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deng, Y.; Yin, Z.; Duan, J.; Zhao, K.; Tang, B.; He, Z. Evolution of microstructure and properties in a new type 2mm Al–Zn–Mg–Sc–Zr alloy sheet. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 517, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Z.; Xiong, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Wang, F.; Liu, H. Investigation of microstructural evolution and mechanical properties during two-step ageing treatment at 115 and 160 °C in an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy pre-stretched thick plate. Mater. Charact. 2008, 59, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wen, K.; Fan, Y.; Wang, G.; Jin, L.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, B. Aging behavior and precipitate characterization of a high Zn-containing Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy with various tempers. Mater. Des. 2016, 101, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kairy, S.K.; Turk, S.; Birbilis, N.; Shekhter, A. The role of microstructure and microchemistry on intergranular corrosion of aluminium alloy AA7085-T7452. Corros. Sci. 2018, 143, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Birbilis, N.; Buchheit, R.G. Electrochemical characteristics of intermetallic phases in aluminium alloys: An experimental survey and discussion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, B140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ramgopal, T.; Schmutz, P.; Frankel, G.S. Electrochemical behaviour of thinfilm analogs of Mg (Zn,Cu,Al)2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, B348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The existing form of Ce and its influence on the segregation of other main elements in the Ce-containing alloy: (a) after homogenization; (b) after solid solution treatment.
Figure 1. The existing form of Ce and its influence on the segregation of other main elements in the Ce-containing alloy: (a) after homogenization; (b) after solid solution treatment.
Metals 10 01318 g001
Figure 2. XRD analysis of the Ce-containing alloy after homogenization and solid solution.
Figure 2. XRD analysis of the Ce-containing alloy after homogenization and solid solution.
Metals 10 01318 g002
Figure 3. DSC curves of the Ce-containing alloy before and after solid solution treatment.
Figure 3. DSC curves of the Ce-containing alloy before and after solid solution treatment.
Metals 10 01318 g003
Figure 4. The recrystallization degree of the experimental alloys after solid solution treatment: (a) Optic micrography images of the Ce-free alloy; (b) OM images of the Ce-containing alloy; (c) EBSD image (d) grain boundary orientation angle distribution and (e) TEM image of the Ce-containing alloy.
Figure 4. The recrystallization degree of the experimental alloys after solid solution treatment: (a) Optic micrography images of the Ce-free alloy; (b) OM images of the Ce-containing alloy; (c) EBSD image (d) grain boundary orientation angle distribution and (e) TEM image of the Ce-containing alloy.
Metals 10 01318 g004
Figure 5. The precipitates distributed along the grain boundaries and elemental mapping of Al, Cu, Zn and Mg in grain boundary phase at different aging treatment of the experimental alloys: (a,b) Ce-free alloy at T6 temper; (c,d) Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper; (e,f) Ce-containing alloy at T7 temper; (g,h) Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper.
Figure 5. The precipitates distributed along the grain boundaries and elemental mapping of Al, Cu, Zn and Mg in grain boundary phase at different aging treatment of the experimental alloys: (a,b) Ce-free alloy at T6 temper; (c,d) Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper; (e,f) Ce-containing alloy at T7 temper; (g,h) Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper.
Metals 10 01318 g005
Figure 6. The maximum depth of attack on the experimental alloy in the IGC test for 24 h: (a) Ce-free alloy at T6 temper; (b) Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper; (c) Ce-containing alloy at T7 temper; (d) Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper.
Figure 6. The maximum depth of attack on the experimental alloy in the IGC test for 24 h: (a) Ce-free alloy at T6 temper; (b) Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper; (c) Ce-containing alloy at T7 temper; (d) Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper.
Metals 10 01318 g006
Figure 7. Results of EXCO evaluations after exposed for 12 h: (a) Ce-free alloy at T6 temper; (b) Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper; (c) Ce-containing alloy at T7 temper; (d) Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper.
Figure 7. Results of EXCO evaluations after exposed for 12 h: (a) Ce-free alloy at T6 temper; (b) Ce-containing alloy at T6 temper; (c) Ce-containing alloy at T7 temper; (d) Ce-containing alloy at RRA temper.
Metals 10 01318 g007
Figure 8. The mechanical properties and conductivity of the Ce-containing alloy at T6T7 and RRA temper: (a) tensile properties; (b) micro hardness and conductivity.
Figure 8. The mechanical properties and conductivity of the Ce-containing alloy at T6T7 and RRA temper: (a) tensile properties; (b) micro hardness and conductivity.
Metals 10 01318 g008
Figure 9. Intragrain precipitates and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of the Ce-containing alloy at various aging tempers: (a,b) T6; (c,d) T7; (e,f) RRA.
Figure 9. Intragrain precipitates and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of the Ce-containing alloy at various aging tempers: (a,b) T6; (c,d) T7; (e,f) RRA.
Metals 10 01318 g009
Table 1. Chemical composition of investigated alloys (at%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of investigated alloys (at%).
AlloyZnMgCuZrFeSiCeAl
Ce-free3.912.430.970.030.030.04-Bal.
Ce-containing3.902.410.980.030.030.090.02Bal.
Table 2. Heat treatment procedure of experimental alloy.
Table 2. Heat treatment procedure of experimental alloy.
Heat Treatment ConditionProcedures
HHomogenization435 °C/8 h + 470 °C/32 h
SSSolid solution450 °C/50 min + 485 °C/30 min
T6Aging120 °C/24 h
T7120 °C/24 h + 160°C/8 h
RRA120 °C/24 h + 190 °C/1 h + 120 °C/24 h
Table 3. Chemical composition of intermetallic phases in Figure 1a (at%).
Table 3. Chemical composition of intermetallic phases in Figure 1a (at%).
PointAlZnMgCuCePhases
A56.84458.76351.242525.10836.5830Al8Cu4(Ce, Zn)
B51.18371.216025.650221.92700.0230Al2CuMg
C94.57613.06121.96760.38010.0001Matrix
Table 4. Chemical composition of grain boundary precipitates in Figure 5 (at%).
Table 4. Chemical composition of grain boundary precipitates in Figure 5 (at%).
PointAlCuZnMgPhase
A56.19.720.713.5η (Mg(Zn,Cu)2)
B64.34.019.012.6η (Mg(Zn,Cu)2)
C59.67.819.613.0η (Mg(Zn,Cu)2)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Shi, D.; Dong, X.; Shi, X.; Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Dai, H. Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of a High-Alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy by Ce Addition and Aging Treatment. Metals 2020, 10, 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101318

AMA Style

Yu X, Zhao Z, Shi D, Dong X, Shi X, Li C, Zhao J, Dai H. Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of a High-Alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy by Ce Addition and Aging Treatment. Metals. 2020; 10(10):1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Xinxiang, Zhiguo Zhao, Dandan Shi, Xiaoyan Dong, Xianli Shi, Caiqiong Li, Junfeng Zhao, and Han Dai. 2020. "Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of a High-Alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy by Ce Addition and Aging Treatment" Metals 10, no. 10: 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101318

APA Style

Yu, X., Zhao, Z., Shi, D., Dong, X., Shi, X., Li, C., Zhao, J., & Dai, H. (2020). Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of a High-Alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy by Ce Addition and Aging Treatment. Metals, 10(10), 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop