Next Article in Journal
How Can I Trust You if You Don’t Know Who You Are? The Consequences of a Fluid Identity on Cross-Racial Organizing between African American Women and Latinas in Atlanta
Next Article in Special Issue
On Footwear and Disability: A Dance of Animacy?
Previous Article in Journal
White Women Wanted? An Analysis of Gender Diversity in Social Justice Magazines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beadwork and the Plasticity of Disability: (Un)Making Bodily Difference, Gender and Apprenticeship in Kinshasa, DR Congo
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Societies 2016, 6(2), 14;

Considering Material Culture in Assessing Assistive Devices: “Breaking up the Rhythm”

Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, 302 Human Ecology Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2N1, Canada
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2N1, Canada
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 prom Sir-William-Osler, Montréal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Gregor Wolbring
Received: 24 December 2015 / Revised: 5 March 2016 / Accepted: 14 April 2016 / Published: 19 April 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [1785 KB, uploaded 19 April 2016]   |  


This paper reports on a project that looked at the meaning stroke survivors assigned to assistive devices. Material culture theory served as a framework to help stroke survivors explicitly consider [dis]ability as a discursive object with a socially constructed meaning that influenced how they thought about themselves with impairment. Material culture theory informed the design (taking and talking to their peers about photos of anything that assisted) and analysis of the meaning of the assistive devices project. In our analysis of the narratives, survivors assigned three types of meanings to the assistive devices: markers of progress, symbolic objects of disability, and the possibility of independent participation. Notably, the meaning of assistive devices as progress, [dis]ability, and [poss]ability was equally evident as participants talked about mobility, everyday activities, and services. We discuss how considering [dis]ability as a discursive object in the situation might have enabled stroke survivors to participate. View Full-Text
Keywords: disability; material culture; stroke; assistive devices disability; material culture; stroke; assistive devices

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Anderson, S.; Kaiser Gladwin, K.; Mayo, N. Considering Material Culture in Assessing Assistive Devices: “Breaking up the Rhythm”. Societies 2016, 6, 14.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Societies EISSN 2075-4698 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top