You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sports
  • Review
  • Open Access

11 January 2017

Soccer and Relative Age Effect: A Walk among Elite Players and Young Players

,
,
and
1
Physical Education Department, Teaching Training Faculty, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
2
Physical Education Department, Teaching Training Faculty, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45004 Toledo, Spain
3
Department of Physical Education Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, Catholic University of Temuco, 02950 Rudecindo Ortega, Temuco, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Performance in Soccer

Abstract

Grouping people according to chronological age is popular in fields such as education and sport. Athletes who are born in the first months of the year usually have cognitive and physical development differences in contrast to those born in the last months of the same year. That is why competitive teams tend to select older players more often than youngsters. Age differences between athletes born in the same year as well as an over-representation of older players are known as the Relative Age Effect. This effect is extensively described in young and elite team sports such as basketball, volleyball or, ice-hockey, as well as in soccer. The purpose of this study is to examine the state-of-the-art of the Relative Age Effect in youth and elite soccer players. This review summarizes recent research articles on the Relative Age Effect related to competitive soccer from 2010 to 2016. The systematic literature search was conducted in four databases: SPORTDiscus, Medline, EBSCO host and Google Scholar. Although causes and final solutions have not been clearly achieved yet, it is necessary to continue investigating this phenomenon in order to provide a starting point for future research.

1. Introduction

Educators and trainers tend to group players by chronological age in order to ensure equal opportunities of success, which is achieved by establishing an “activity year” [1]. The teams are often organized into annual age-groups, for which 1 January is normally used as the cut-off date [2,3]. This concept is named ‘Relative Age’. It refers to the differences among the birth-months of the players during the same year. The consequences of this term are named ‘Relative Age Effect’ (RAE) [4,5]. In this regard, an over-representation of players born during the first two quarters of the year and an under-representation of players born during the last two quarters of the same year [3,6,7,8,9] is observed. RAE is especially relevant during the adolescence years, due to the fact that physical characteristics are related to an increased chronological age [10]. Then, athletes born earlier in the year have an advantage over those born later in the same year when they encounter a similar task or exercise [11]. However, RAE decreases after the adolescent period. This is explained by physical maturation being less determinant [10].
The Relative Age Effect has been identified in many strength-, endurance-, and technique-related sports, as well as in competitive forms [3] such as baseball [12], ice hockey [6], tennis [13] or soccer [11]. Although, this phenomenon has been observed in education as well [14], it is suggested that children who were born in January will have a whole year of maturation advantage compared to children born in December [15]. However, the RAE has not shown a serious impact during formal education or adulthood employment [16]. RAE has been investigated widely in male sports compared to female sports [17].
The first study about RAE and sport was supported by Barnsley and Thompson (1985) [18]. These authors analyzed the birthdates of hockey players in the United States. This study showed that players who were born during the first months of the year had advantages in comparison with those born during the last months, due to their participation in the competition. As a result, this could cause that the youngest players feel frustrated and finally leave their team. The first study about RAE and soccer was conducted by Barnsley, Thompson and Legault in 1992 [1]. They investigated under-20 and under-17 players who participated in the 1990 World Football Cup. Results indicated that those players born in the first months (quarters) of the year were over-represented, while those born in the last months of the same year were under-represented.
The Relative Age Effect in soccer has been identified among young and elite soccer players in several countries including Belgium, Denmark, England, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden [11], Germany [19], Spain [20], Brazil [21], the United States [22] and Australia [23]. However, in sports where physical attributes such as size and body mass might be less likely to influence performance, for instance golf, the RAE has not been identified [24]. On the other hand, ‘inverse’ RAE (an over-representation of players in the final part of the year and an under-representation of players at the beginning of the same year) was found in non-physical sports activities including shooting sports [25].
It is possible to identify two types of factors which influence the degree of incidence of RAE in a specific sport. First, extrinsic factors, such as socioeconomic determinants, may increase competitiveness in access and opportunities during talent identification. Second, intrinsic factors, such as physical and psychological characteristics, may connect sport experience with talent [26]. For this reason, coaches are an important social agent of RAE biased selection of children with physical and maturation advantages [15]. That is also why researchers have wanted to know whether coaches are aware of RAE. The latest studies highlighted the importance of coach education in all fields of RAE, including the decision-making process during talent detection as well as various practical and managerial recommendations on coach organization [26,27,28,29].
For all the above, it is necessary to identify the presence of RAE in different contexts and at different ages. In this sense, the aim of this manuscript is to analyze the RAE in young football players (from 6 to 18 years old) and elite football players (more than 18 years old) as well as its possible solutions derived from the most recent studies. The main hypothesis is formulated as a significant increase of RAE on competitive soccer players from 2010 to 2016 around the world.

2. Methods

In this paper, results, conclusions and implications about RAE in young and elite soccer players during the last years were analyzed. In order to make a thorough review, the manuscript also follows some systematic review and meta-analysis recommendations [30].

2.1. Problem Formulation

This paper is a bibliographic review that tries to answer the questions below:
-
Is RAE maintained across age categories?
-
Is RAE present in female soccer players?
-
Is RAE influenced by the player position on the pitch?
-
Is RAE related to physical advantages of the older players in contrast to the young players born in the same year?
-
Is RAE increasing during 2010 to 2016 around the world or is it influenced by the size of the country? Is there any solution which helps to reduce RAE?
Consequently, the main objective is to observe the presence of RAE in the latest studies as well as to assess which topics are related with this effect in order to explain possible solutions.
The hypothesis is formulated as an increase of RAE on competitive soccer players during the last years around the world due to the physical advantages that players born in the first months of the year have got in contrast to players born in the last part of the same year.

2.2. Procedures and Research Selection

The main method used to do a systematic literature search was the use of four reference databases—SPORTDiscus, Medline, EBSCO host and Google Scholar—which include journal papers found in scientific journals related to Sports and Education. The keywords used, as is shown in Figure 1, were ‘Relative Age Effect’, ‘Soccer’, ‘Elite Soccer Players’ and ‘Young Soccer Players’. Additionally, English Boolean data type ‘and’, ‘not’ and ‘or’ were used.
Figure 1. Keywords and Boolean data type used in our search.
Papers for this review were included according to the following criteria:
(1)
Published in English or Spanish.
(2)
Published from 2010 to 2016. Articles which define the first concept of RAE were included.
(3)
Included information about the RAE among young soccer players and/or elite soccer players.
(4)
Included information about the RAE related to maturation, anthropometric characteristics, and physical fitness.
(5)
Included information about RAE in several representative countries from all of the five continents.
Review and opinion articles as well as articles focusing on other sports were excluded from this review. Articles which have similar information about the effect in the same country were excluded due to the great amount of papers about RAE around the world.

2.3. Bibliographic Selection Process

First, an analysis of the first RAE article was carried out in order to achieve the first definition and its hypothesis [18]. Second, a revision of two review articles [31,32] was carried out to check how RAE increased through several sports as well as how to proceed with the review investigation of this effect. Third, a revision of original papers published by authors that had investigated this effect in soccer during the last six years was performed.
Articles published before 2010 were automatically excluded. On the other hand, articles which compare the RAE between international competitions as well as physical or cognitive characteristics were also analyzed in order to see the relationship between RAE and other factors in young and elite soccer players and to enrich the manuscript. Although the largest number of researchers study RAE and male soccer players, two articles which investigate the effect among female soccer players were included.
According to the criteria selection, 28 manuscripts were chosen. At least two studies were carried out in every year of publication. A table has been drawn up in order to organize the topic as well as to facilitate the comparison between each research paper.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the summary of the recent RAE research in elite male and female young soccer players reviewed. Format and design, including the author and the year of publication, the purpose of the study, the participants, the data, the result of the investigation and the relevant conclusions or final discussion are included.
Table 1. Summary of the investigations related to the RAE.

4. Discussion

The results of the present review confirm the presence of RAE among lower soccer age categories and elite soccer categories around the world. The first date when a RAE study was developed and noted was 1985 [18]. In this line, recent studies reveal that this effect is still present in several sports and has increased in the last two decades [31], especially in popular sport such as soccer [51]. The effect has been examined around the world: America [40,47], Europe [5,7,26,20,29,44] and also in Asia [36,48]. RAE is also investigated alongside several topics (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Summary of the topics affected by RAE and its impacts.

4.1. RAE among Age Categories

Several studies were observed which compared RAE effects between age categories. RAE seems to decrease at older groups (U-17 and U-18) compared to younger groups [54]. RAE could be due to the minimal differences between players born in the same year in physical and anthropometric variables [51,52]. In this sense, some authors tend to assess the presence of RAE in youth teams using the national population of the country investigated [20,44,47]. However, there are many elite players that come from others inferior teams. So, using global population to observe the RAE in elite clubs could affect the distribution and distort the final results [7]. In these cases, it could be useful to compare the significant participants with the licensed soccer players.

4.2. RAE in Female Soccer

Soccer attracts more attention in the male population and competitions are likely to be most popular among male players than female athletes [34]. That is why there is a great amount of studies on RAE in male sports in contrast to studies on RAE in female sports. In this research, two studies which investigate RAE in French and Swiss soccer players were included. Both of them confirm traditional RAE distribution. The effect is also present in the FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup held in 2008 and 2010 [17]. However, RAE varied among geographical zones. An inverse RAE existed in some parts of Africa, such as Ghana or Nigeria, but not in South Africa [17]. The lack of RAE was also found in Israel [55]. This could be explained by the fact that the number of female players is low [55], as well as the difficulties found to collect data in some African countries [39]. RAE is related to the player position on the pitch [39]. RAE is widely extended in female goalkeepers and defenders due to the physical requirements for these positions [39].
A biased distribution of dropout players was found in the lower categories of age [20]. An over-representation of Q3 and Q4 players, who leave their teams, is influenced by the anthropometric characteristics such as physical growth during the young categories. More investigations are needed in female sport, especially in soccer [34,39].

4.3. RAE on the Pitch

RAE in soccer has also been studied depending on player positions. Thus, RAE is more visible at several positions than others. Positions in competition are influenced by specific physical and maturational characteristics. Consequently midfielders, defenders and goalkeepers have been observed as being over-represented by athletes who were born in the first part of the year [26,44]. However, forwards and defenders have been identified as the positions most influenced by RAE in some countries such as Spain [5,45]. In the last years, a change of RAE has been observed in goalkeepers tending to forwards. Children feel more attracted by “more spectacular and amusing” positions, such as midfielders, forwards or defenders. Due to this fact, a great demand of players in these positions has been noted in comparison to others such as goalkeepers [5]. However, defender is the only position in which the RAE effect has been observed permanently. It is explained by the importance of the physical resistance and maturation attributes in this position [5].

4.4. Physical Advantages and RAE

In order to observe whether RAE and physical advantages are related to the player selection process, different studies have used several physical tests on soccer players [50,53]. This relationship is suggested to be crucial to determine whether being older means having an advanced biological maturation status (increasing the possibilities to be joined to an important team) [43]. It also helps to explain the great number of players born earlier in the selection year [41]. For example, players who were born in the first part of the year have shown better results in the 15 m test, proving to be faster and more skilled players than athletes who were born in the last quartile of the same year [4]. In addition, older players have revealed an advanced skeletal maturation, were taller, heavier and had long legs. This is also an advantage in competition [46]. However, the use of several physical tests such as the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1, does not suggest a significant advantage in terms of soccer-specific endurance among players [41].

4.5. RAE around the World. RAE during History

Nations are another topic that has been related with RAE. Every study collects a national or international sample. So, it has been analyzed whether RAE is present everywhere including international competitions. RAE was observed during ten years in male FIFA U17 World Cup teams [56], as well as in the FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup [17]. It was also observed in the 2012 European Soccer Championship [49], as well as in the FIFA U17 World Cup Emirates 2013 [48].
The size of the country has been revealed as an important factor. In a small country such as Israel, where RAE was not observed, a small number of players interested in a specific sport was noted [36]. Thus, flexible policies (“open doors for everybody”) are suggested in order to recruit players. Amazingly, some African countries that won international competitions had an inversed birthdate distribution (an over-representation of players born in the last month of the year) [48]. This result could be explained by the emphasis on the tactical aspects versus the physical characteristics, although this new hypothesis needs to be assessed. Occidental countries tend to focus on final results, such as long legs or body mass for better technical–tactical aspects, meanwhile other countries seem to value more emotional aspects such as motivation, to the detriment of physical maturation.
In other parts of the world, RAE is increased over the years [40]. In the 2000/01 season, RAE was not observed in Spain and Portugal. However, in the 2010/11 season, only Portugal was observed to avoid RAE [42]. Furthermore, more historical investigations at international competitions are needed in order to observe whether clubs that present high RAE have more probabilities of winning the competition [53].

4.6. Practical Application

The findings of this review indicate that the player selection process is unavoidable in a popular sport such as soccer [38]. Coaches usually select players according to an immediate own-need during the season, not taking into account the process of development of the athlete [33]. This could favor the over-representation of the physically advantaged players because younger players, who differ from their older peers, are at risk of leaving their teams [33,35]. Thus, clubs focus on the older players who try to develop as professional players [46]. Although RAE has been identified in the final stage of the competition [38], it does not guarantee success [48]. Indeed, coaches should be properly trained in order to create a homogenous birth-month distribution that prevents dropouts in sport [29]. Coaches hold specific stereotypes about physical size and positive performance attributes among players born in the same year but in different months [15].
In order to make the system more efficient and equal, trainers should be instructed in several important aspects [3,37]. Firstly, they should be sure that the talent promotion is to develop individual potential for elite performance in the future. For instance, tactical skills related to positioning [57]. Secondly, they should be aware of the player perspectives and pay less attention to the momentary level of performance [38]. There are other factors that influence growth and maturation, such as status at birth, household environment, familial correlation, family size, diet and probably others [57].
RAE represents a bias distribution among young players which seems to decrease among elite players. Solutions should be shown for those professionals who participate in the soccer talent selection as well as in the development process [1,54]. Here, as can be seen in Figure 3, we present some recommendations observed in the manuscripts review to reduce the RAE [20,32]:
A)
To alter or rotate the annual cut-off date, which normally is on 31 December, in order to offer different groups of players with a relative age advantage. That could balance the system season after season [6] as well as being fairer [3].
B)
To create alternative ways of grouping children for competition based on anthropometric attributes such as height and weight instead of isolated age [1] in order to reduce the maturational effect [49].
C)
To develop internal changes in soccer academies as well as improving some rules in the competition. In these cases, clubs could lower the pressure on players taking part in a youth competition in order to avoid dropout players [35], classifying teams according to quarterly periods.
D)
To educate coaches and inform parents that the genuine potential of a soccer player comes at the end of the maturation process [20,49].
E)
To improve the selection test which guarantees a real evaluation of technical and tactical aspects [28,49] as well as enhancing the playing time for all players, which increases the motivation [52].
F)
To design smaller competition groups at young categories as well as group categorized players according to the level of ability which ensures greater opportunity of participation and increases motivation [42,49].
G)
To assign numbers on players’ shirts according to their relative age allows coaches to be aware of the personal characteristics of each player. On one hand, this helps coaches to adapt their training to the needs of each player. Conversely, this helps players become aware of skill differences as a result of the relative age differences of their peers [58].
H)
To develop corrective adjustments between datasets could help improve the validity of the player’s evaluation and selection process [59].
Figure 3. Brief recommendations to avoid RAE in soccer.
On the other hand, the bio-banding is the process of grouping players according to their growth and their maturity attributes rather than age [60]. This process could be applicable at competitions, as well as talent identification. Thus, non-invasive methods for estimating maturity status, such as body mass, height, parental height and weight, may allow young talent detection programs to organize players by maturing status rather than chronological age. This could equalize competition and could be a process to avoid RAE [61].
Finally, manuscripts analyzed showed that RAE was observed more often in youth teams in contrast with elite clubs. More research is needed in African countries, where RAE was observed to be lower. More studies about female players have to be studied as well. It is important to improve coaches’ teaching training programs. It could equalize the talent selection system as well as avoiding that high skilled players are named as ‘non-talented’ [28].

5. Conclusions

The hypothesis is confirmed: RAE is increasing during the last years in youth elite competition. However, no significant RAE was found in elite soccer teams due to the fact that physical advantages do not exist in older players. It has been observed that RAE depends on several factors, such as physical advantages, the player position on the pitch, the size of the country and the talent detection process. Although recommendations to avoid RAE were proposed, more investigations are needed in order to carry out an effective tool which might reduce RAE. Future research should also focus on the physical characteristics related to sport performance in order to minimize the RAE and balance the quarter distribution during the same year in teams.

Author Contributions

Sixto González-Víllora Conceived and designed the review; Manuel Jacob Sierra-Díaz, Sixto González-Víllora, Juan Carlos Pastor-Vicedo and Jaime Serra-Olivares performed the review, analyzed the data and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Manuel Jacob Sierra-Díaz and Sixto González-Víllora wrote the paper; Manuel Jacob Sierra-Díaz, Sixto González-Víllora, Juan Carlos Pastor-Vicedo and Jaime Serra-Olivares provided comments and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations were used in this manuscript:
Age at peak height velocity(APHV)
Birth quarters(Q)
Counter movement jump(CMJ)
Fédération Internationale de Football Association(FIFA)
Multivariate analysis of covariance(MANCOVA)
Standing broad jump(SBJ)
Under n° years old(U-n°)

References

  1. Barnsley, R.H.; Thompson, A.H.; Legault, P. Family planning: Football style. The relative age effect in football. Int. Rev. F Sociol. Sport 1992, 27, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cobley, S.; Baker, J.; Wattie, N.; McKenna, J. Annual age-grouping and athlete development. A meta-analytical review of relative age effect in sport. Sports Med. 2009, 39, 235–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Müller, L.; Hildebrandt, C.; Schnitzer, M.; Raschner, C. The role of a relative age effect in the 12th Winter European Youth Olympic Festival in 2015. Percept. Motor Skill. 2016, 122, 701–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gil, S.M.; Badiola, A.; Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I.; Zabala-Lili, J.; Gravina, L.; Santos-Concejero, J.; Lekue, J.A.; Granados, C. Relationship between the relative age effect and anthropometry, maturity and performance in young soccer players. J. Sports Sci. 2013, 32, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Prieto-Ayuso, A.; Pastor-Vicedo, J.C.; Serra-Olivares, J.; González-Víllora, S. Relative age effect in Spanish Football: The 2013/14 season. Apunts 2015, 121, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnsley, R.H.; Thompson, A.H. Birthdate and success in minor hockey: The key to the NHL. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 1988, 20, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Delorme, N.; Boiché, J.; Raspaud, M. Relative age effect in elite sports: Methodological bias or real discrimination? Eur. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 10, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Steingröver, C.; Wattie, N.; Baker, J.; Schorer, J. Does relative age affect career length in North American professional sports? Sports Med. Open 2016, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Macedo-Penna, E.; Túlio-de-Mello, M.; Melo-Ferreira, R.; Couto-de-Albuquerque-Morales, L.C.; da-Costa, V.T. Relative age effect on the reaction time of soccer players under 13 years old. Motriz Revista Educação Física 2015, 21, 194–199. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgess, D.; Naughton, G. Talent development in adolescent team sports: A review. Int. J. Sports Physciol. Perform. 2010, 5, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
  11. Helsen, W.F.; Winckel, J.V.; Williams, A.M. The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. J. Sports Sci. 2005, 23, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thompson, A.H.; Barnsley, R.H.; Stebelsky, G. “Born to play a ball”: The relative age effect and Major League Baseball. Sociol. Sport J. 1991, 8, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Edgar, S.; O’Donoghue, P. Season of birth distribution of elite tennis player. J. Sports Sci. 2005, 23, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dixon, J.; Horton, S.; Weir, P. Relative age effects: Implications for leadership development. Int. J. Sport Soc. 2011, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Furley, P.; Memmert, D. Coaches’ implicit associations between size and giftedness: Implications for the relative age effect. Int. J. Sports Sci. 2015, 34, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pehkonen, J.; Viinikainen, J.; Böckerman, P.; Pulkki-Råback, P.; Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.; Raitakari, O. Relative age at schoolentry, school performance and long-term labour market outcomes. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2015, 22, 1345–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romann, M.; Fuchslocher, J. Influences of player nationality, playing position, and height on relative age effects at women’s under FIFA World Cup. J. Sports Sci. 2013, 31, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Barnsley, R.H.; Thompson, A.H.; Barnsley, P.E. Hockey success and birthdate: The relative age effect of the Canadian Association of Health. Phys. Educ. Recreat. 1985, 51, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cobley, S.P.; Schorer, J.; Baker, J. Relative age effect in professional German Soccer: A historical analysis. J. Sports Sci. 2008, 26, 1531–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gutierrez-Díaz-Del-Campo, D.; Pastor-Vicedo, J.C.; González-Víllora, S.; Contreras-Jordán, O.R. The relative age effect in youth soccer players from Spain. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2010, 9, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Costa, V.T.; Simim, M.A.; Noce, F.; Costa, I.T.; Samulski, D.M.; Moraes, L.C. Comparison of relative age of elite athletes participating in the 2008 Brazilian soccer championship series A and B. Motricidade 2009, 5, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vincent, J.; Glamser, F. Gender differences in the relative age effect among US Olympic development program youth soccer players. J. Sports Sci. 2006, 24, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Van-Den-Honert, R. Evidence of the relative age effect in football in Australia. J. Sports Sci. 2012, 30, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Côté, J.; Macdonald, D.J.; Baker, J.; Abernethy, B. When “where” is more important than “when”: Birthplace and birthdate effects on the achievements of sporting expertise. J. Sports Sci. 2006, 24, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Delorme, N.; Raspaud, M. Is there an influence of relative age on participation in non-physical sports activities? The Example of Shooting Sports. J. Sports Sci. 2009, 27, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lesma, M.L.; Pérez-González, B.; Salinero, J.J. Relative Age Effect in Spanish Football League. J. Sport Health Res. 2011, 3, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  27. Helsen, W.F.; Hodges, N.J.; Winckel, J.V.; Starkes, J.L. The roles of talent, physical precocity and practice in the development of soccer expertise. J. Sports Sci. 2000, 18, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hill, B.; Sotiriadou, P. Coach decision-making and the relative age effect on talent selection in football. Eur. Sport. Manag. Q. 2016, 16, 292–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mulazimoglu, O. The relative age effect in youth and professional soccer players in Turkey. Anthropologist 2014, 18, 391–398. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sánchez-Meca, J. Cómo realizar una revisión sistemática y un meta-análisis. Aula Abierta 2010, 38, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wattie, N.; Schorer, J.; Baker, J. The relative age effect in sport: A developmental systems model. Sports Med. 2015, 45, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gutiérrez-Díaz-Del-Campo, D. Review of relative age effects and potential ways to reduce them in sport and education. Retos 2013, 23, 51–63. [Google Scholar]
  33. Coelho-E-Silva, M.J.; Figueiredo, A.J.; Simões, F.; Seabra, A.; Natal, A.; Vaeyens, R.; Philippaerts, R.; Cumming, S.P.; Malina, R.M. Discrimination of U-14 soccer players by level and position. Int. J. Sports Med. 2010, 31, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Delorme, N.; Boiché, J.; Raspaud, M. Relative age effect in female sport: A diachronic examination of soccer players. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010, 20, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Delorme, N.; Boiché, J.; Raspaud, M. Relative age and dropout in French Male Soccer. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 28, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lidor, R.; Côté, J.; Arnon, M.; Zeev, A.; Cohen-Maoz, S. Relative age and birthdate effects in Division 1 players—Do they exist in a small country? Talent Dev. Excell. 2010, 2, 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wiium, N.; Atle-Lie, S.; Ommundsen, Y.; Enksen, H.R. Does relative age effect exist among Norwegian Professional Soccer players? Int. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2010, 22, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
  38. Augste, C.; Lames, M. The relative age effect and success in German elite U-17 soccer teams. J. Sports Sci. 2011, 29, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Romann, M.; Fuchslocher, J. Influence of the selection level, age and playing position on relative age effects in Swiss women’s soccer. Talent Dev. Excell. 2011, 3, 239–247. [Google Scholar]
  40. Teoldo, I.; Albuquerque, M.R.; Garganta, J. Relative age effect in Brazilian soccer players: A historical analysis. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 2012, 12, 563–570. [Google Scholar]
  41. Deprez, D.; Vaeyens, R.; Coutts, A.J.; Lenoir, M.; Philippaerts, R. Relative age effect and Yo-Yo IR1 in youth soccer. Int. J. Sports Med. 2012, 33, 987–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Helsen, W.F.; Baker, J.; Michiels, S.; Schorer, J.; Van-Winckel, J.; Williams, A.M. The relative age effect in European professional soccer: Did ten years of research make any difference? J. Sports Sci. 2012, 30, 1665–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Deprez, D.; Coutts, A.J.; Fransen, J.; Deconinck, F.; Lenoir, M.; Vaeyens, R.; Philippaerts, R. Relative age, biological maturation and anaerobic characteristics in elite youth soccer players. Int. J. Sports Med. 2013, 34, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Romann, M.; Fuchslocher, J. Relative age effects in Swiss junior soccer and their relationship with playing position. Eur. J. Sports Sci. 2013, 13, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salinero, J.J.; Pérez, B.; Burillo, P.; Lesma, M.L. Relative age effect in European professional football. Analysis by position. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2013, 8, 966–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fragoso, I.; Massuca, L.M.; Ferreira, J. Effect of birth month on physical fitness of soccer players (Under-15) according to biological maturity. Int. J. Sports Med. 2014, 36, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Massa, M.; Caldas-Costa, E.C.; Moreira, A.; Rogérin-Thiengo, C.; Rodrigues-de-Lima, M.; Quispe-Marquez, W.; Saldanha-Aoki, M. The relative age effect in soccer: A case study of the São Paulo Football Club. Braz. Rev. Bras. Cineantropom. Desempenho. Hum. 2014, 16, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Andrade-Souza, V.A.; Moniz, F.; Teoldo, I. Relative age effect in FIFA U17 Emirates 2013 World Cup: Analysis of player who effectively participated in the matches. Motriz Revista Educação Física 2015, 4, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. González-Víllora, S.; Pastor-Vicedo, J.C.; Cordente, D. Relative age effect in UEFA Championship Soccer players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2015, 29, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lovell, R.; Towlson, C.; Parkin, G.; Portas, M.; Vaeyens, R.; Cobley, S. Soccer player characteristics in English Lower-League development programmes: The relationships between relative age, maturation, anthropometry and physical fitness. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mikulič, M.; Gregora, P.; Benkovský, L.; Peráček, P. The relative age effect on the selection in the Slovakia National Football Teams. Acta Fac. Educ. Phys. Univ. Comen. 2015, 55, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arve-Sæther, S. Presence of the relative age effect and its effect on playing time among under-20 players in the Norwegian premier league Tippeligaen—A four-year follow up. Monten. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2016, 5, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  53. Skorski, S.; Skorski, S.; Faude, O.; Hammes, D.; Meyer, T. The relative age effect in German Elite Youth Soccer: Implications for a successful career. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2016, 11, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mujika, I.; Vaeyens, R.; Matthys, S.P.; Santisteban, J.; Goiriena, J.; Philippaerts, R. The relative age effect in a professional football club setting. J. Sports Sci. 2009, 27, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lidor, R.; Arnon, M.; Maayan, Z.; Gershon, T.; Côté, J. Relative age effect and birthplace effect in Division 1 female ballgame players—The relevance of sport-specific factors. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2014, 12, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Williams, J. Relative age effect in youth soccer: Analysis of the FIFA U17 World Cup competition. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010, 20, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Malina, R.M.; Rogol, A.D.; Cumming, S.P.; Coelho-e-Silva, M.J.; Figueiredo, A.J. Biological maturation of youth athletes: Assessment and implications. Br. J. Sports Med. 2015, 49, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mann, D.L.; Van-Ginneken, P.J. Age-ordered shirt numbering reduces the selection bias associated with the relative age effect. J. Sports. Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Romann, M.; Cobley, S. Relative age effect in athletic sprinting and corrective adjustments as a solution for their removal. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Malina, R.M.; Ribeiro, B.; Aroso, J.; Cumming, S.P. Characteristics of youth soccer players aged 13–15 years classified by skill level. Br. J. Sports Med. 2007, 41, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Malina, R.M.; Cumming, S.P.; Morano, P.J.; Barron, M.; Miller, S.J. Maturity status of youth football players: A noninvasive estimate. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2005, 37, 1044–1052. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.