Next Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution of Bactrocera dorsalis and Thaumatotibia leucotreta in Smallholder Avocado Orchards along Altitudinal Gradient of Taita Hills and Mount Kilimanjaro
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Sporulation and Germination by the Spider Mite Pathogenic Fungus Neozygites floridana (Neozygitomycetes: Neozygitales: Neozygitaceae) Based on Temperature, Humidity and Time
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/insects9020070
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Susceptibility of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Soil-Borne Entomopathogenic Fungi

by
Rafaela F. Amatuzzi
1,*,
Carolina G. Poitevin
1,
Alex S. Poltronieri
2,
Maria A. C. Zawadneak
1 and
Ida C. Pimentel
1
1
Departamento de Patologia Básica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Paraná, Brazil
2
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2018, 9(2), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020070
Submission received: 1 May 2018 / Revised: 8 June 2018 / Accepted: 11 June 2018 / Published: 19 June 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Duponchelia fovealis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is an invasive species that has had a large impact on strawberry crops in Brazil. Pesticides have had limited effectiveness and the use of biological control agents to improve its management is the most appropriate approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathogenicity and virulence of entomopathogenic fungi—isolated from soil—against Duponchelia fovealis larvae under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Pathogenicity screenings were performed for twenty isolates from Beauveria bassiana, Beauveria caledonica, Isaria javanica, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Lecanicillium sp. against third instar larvae of D. fovealis at the concentration of 109 conidia·mL−1. Lethal concentration (LC50) and lethal time (LT50) were determined for the most pathogenic isolates and for one commercial mycoinsecticide. Mortality rates varied from 10 to 89%. The isolates B. bassiana Bea1, Bea110, Bea111 and I. javanica Isa340 were the most pathogenic. The most virulent isolates were B. bassiana Bea111 and I. javanica Isa340 with LC50 values of 2.33 × 106 and 9.69 × 105 conidia·mL−1, respectively. Under greenhouse conditions, the efficacy of LC50 of the isolates I. javanica Isa340 and B. bassiana Bea111 were 45% and 52%, respectively. Our results indicate that these isolates are strong candidates for application in the control of D. fovealis. This study is the first evaluation of soil-borne entomopathogenic fungi against D. fovealis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is a native species from the marshlands of southern Europe and has become one of the most destructive pests of greenhouse and strawberry crops in several countries, including Portugal [1], Italy [2], Turkey [3] and Brazil [4]. The larvae cause economic damage by feeding on the leaves, flowers, and crown, which results in wilting, collapse, and death of the plants and consequently reducing crop quality and yield [4]. Due to the need for daily picking of strawberry fruit and with the increasing awareness of problems associated with pesticide use, development of alternative control strategies have become the main goal in the integrated pest management (IPM) of pests such as D. fovealis [5,6,7]. Biological control is one of the most promising options [4,6,8], although there have been few studies on its application against D. fovealis. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) have attributes that make them strong candidates for use against this pest [9]. They are widespread in terrestrial environments, especially in the soil, which is considered a reservoir [10], and are important natural regulators of insect populations through infection by contact, consequently increasing the potential for epizootics and mortality rates in the pest population [11]. Fungi of the genera Beauveria, Metarhizium, and Isaria are widely known as biological control agents [12,13] and they are safe for farmers, consumers, and the environment [14,15,16]. Thus, preventive methods through integrated pest management can be used as an alternative to the chemical control of D. fovealis.
Traits such as virulence and pathogenicity are considered important properties of entomopathogens used in pest control [17]. Although entomopathogenic fungi have been widely used against a number of insect pests, no data are available on the efficacy of fungi against D. fovealis. This study aims to contribute to the implementation of an improved IPM program for this pest, with the first report of tested EPF isolated from native forest and crop systems soils against D. fovealis larvae under laboratory and greenhouse conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Isolates and Insects

EPFs were isolated from soil samples collected between January and June 2015 from different geographical sites in the state of Parana, Brazil (Table 1). The isolates are deposited at the Paraná State Microbiological Collection Network—TAXONline (CMRP), Department of Basic Pathology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. Tests were conducted on third instar larvae of D. fovealis obtained from a stock colony reared on an artificial diet and maintained under controlled conditions of 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% relative humidity (RH), and a 14-h photophase [18].

2.2. Production of Fungal Conidial Suspensions

Each isolate (Table 1) was cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) medium and incubated at 25 °C in complete darkness for 15 days until sporulation was abundant. Conidia from each isolate were harvested under sterile flow conditions using a sterile steel spatula to scrape them into 30 mL glass tubes with 20 mL of 0.3% (v/v) Tween® 80 solution. Conidial suspensions of each isolate were vortexed for 15 min at 120 rpm and then filtered, using sterile gauze (10 × 15 cm), into new 30 mL glass tubes. Suspensions were prepared independently for each assay and concentrations were adjusted by serial dilution to achieve a comparable number of conidia per milliliter in an aqueous 0.3% Tween® 80 solution. Spore suspensions were used immediately after preparation and concentrations were adjusted using a hemocytometer. Spore viability was determined by direct counting [19,20]. Viability was then determined using a microscope (400× magnification) by visualization of 200 spores; spores that presented germinative tube growth were considered as viable. This procedure was adopted for all isolates and viability ranged from 90 to 95%.

2.3. Pathogenicity Bioassay

Strawberry leaves were disinfected superficially [21] and their petioles were wrapped in cotton and placed in a 20 mL glass tube with autoclaved sterile distilled water and then positioned in acrylic boxes (11 × 11 × 3.5 cm). The experimental design was completely randomized. Each treatment was conducted with five replications. Twenty-four third instar D. fovealis larvae were transferred to each box, so that each box was considered a replication, for a total of 120 larvae tested per treatment. A Sagyma SW776 airbrush (10 lb pol−1) was used to spray 1 mL of a conidial suspension at a concentration of 109 conidia·mL−1 and Tween® 80 at 0.3% over the leaves and larvae. The control treatment received 1 mL of sterile distilled water with 0.3% (v/v) Tween® 80. After spraying, boxes were kept under controlled conditions (25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, and 14-h photophase). Mortality was assessed after 7 days. Moribund individuals or those that did not respond to touch with a paintbrush were considered dead. These specimens were transferred to Petri dishes with moistened filter paper until fungal extrusion to check for postmortem sporulation. The experiment was carried out for 5 weeks.

2.4. Virulence Bioassay and Determination of LC50

Fungal strains that caused high mortality rates of third instar larvae D. fovealis were selected to determine lethal concentration (LC50) and lethal time (LT50). Five concentrations were tested: 1 × 104; 1 × 105; 1 × 106; 1 × 107, 1 × 108 conidia·mL−1. For each concentration, 120 larvae were used, divided into five replicates. The control treatment consisted of sterile distilled water added 0.3% (v/v) Tween® 80. A commercially available biopesticide (Bovemax®) was used for comparison, containing B. bassiana CG716 strain as the active ingredient. Spraying was conducted as described for the pathogenicity bioassay and the samples were monitored daily for 7 days. Mortality assessments were also conducted as described above.

2.5. Greenhouse Assay

The fungi that presented the lowest LC50 (between 1 × 105 and 1 × 106 conidia·mL−1) in the laboratory bioassays were selected for the greenhouse assay. Healthy 3-month-old strawberry seedlings of the ‘Albion’ variety were transferred into 500 mL containers with the Plantmax® potting mix. The plants were kept under natural light and watered twice a day. During the assay, minimum, maximum, and 24-h mean temperatures in the greenhouse were recorded daily with a digital thermometer (Incoterme). The experimental design was completely randomized. Each treatment was tested on 20 seedlings, each considered a replicate. The plant leaves were sprayed with 33 mL of fungal suspension of the selected isolates using a CO2 precision sprayer (Teejet XR11008VS, Spraying Systems Company, Wheaton, IL, USA). This volume corresponds to 200 L ha−1 with a density of 60,000 plants, as recommended by manufacturers of most commercial biopesticides. The control was sprayed with sterile distilled water containing Tween® 80 at 0.3% (v/v). Spraying was carried out from the bottom upwards to ensure coverage of all surfaces. Each plant was then infested with 10 third instar larvae of D. fovealis and isolated in cages covered by voile fabric. To prevent insects from escaping through the soil, they were isolated by a transparent laminated plastic disc (30 cm) covering the entire surface of the pot with a small central opening for the plant stem. Mortality was assessed after 7 days.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

In the pathogenicity test, mean mortality rates (%) were used to calculate fungal efficiency according to Abbott’s equation [22] and the treatments were compared using Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Estimated LC50 and LT50 were calculated by Probit analysis using PoloPlus software [23]. For the greenhouse assay, the mean number of insects per strawberry plant was analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). When differences were significant compared to the control group, efficacy was calculated according to Henderson and Tilton’s formula [24].

3. Results

3.1. Pathogenicity Bioassay

Mortality of D. fovealis larvae varied between 10% and 89% (Figure 1). Of the 20 fungi tested (Table 1), thirteen isolates caused significant mortality compared to the control group (4.76%) (F20,84 = 10.43, p < 0.01). The treatments with B. bassiana (Bea1, Bea3, Bea111), B. caledonica (Bea110), and I. javanica (Isa340) induced the highest mortality rates, which varied between 48% and 89%. For the B. bassiana isolates Bea2, Bea4, and A2B and M. anisopliae 381, 110B, 399A, 399B, and 315, the mortality ranged between 27% and 45%. M. anisopliae isolates 399C, 110C, 110D, 104, 107, Lecanicillium sp. (In), and B. bassiana Bea5 were not significantly pathogenic with mortality rates below 22%. Fungal extrusion was observed in all larvae with various degrees of mycelial growth among the treatments at the end of 7 days of incubation.

3.2. Virulence Bioassay

The proportion of insects infected increased with the conidial concentrations tested in D. fovealis larvae. There was a significant mortality of D. fovealis larvae among isolates for each concentration, 104 (F4,24 = 20.77, p = 0.001), 105 (F4,24 = 20.11, p = 0.001), 106 (F4,24 = 5.40, p < 0.004), 107 (F4,24 = 96.39, p < 0.001), and 108 (F4,24 = 269.96, p < 0.001), although the increased concentrations did not produce the same effect for all fungal isolates (Figure 2). Significant differences in the mortality between B. bassiana Bea111 and I. javanica Isa340 isolates were found in 107 and 108 conidia·mL−1 concentrations. The Beauveria bassiana isolate Bea1 caused the lowest infection rates in larvae compared with the other isolates at all conidial concentrations and Bovemax® obtained mortality similar to I. javanica isolate Isa340 at all concentrations except 107 and 108 conidia·mL−1.
Isolates Isa340 (I. javanica) and Bea111 (B. bassiana) presented the lowest effective concentrations (Table 2) with lethal concentrations and average times of 9.69 × 105 conidia·mL−1 in 6.4 days and 2.33 × 106 conidia·mL−1 in 7.2 days, respectively. The LC50 for the commercial isolate Bovemax® (B. bassiana) was 1.41 × 107 conidia·mL−1 with a similar LT50 (7.5 days). The results for the isolates Bea110 (B. caledonica) and Bea1 (B. bassiana) were less promising with higher lethal concentrations.

3.3. Greenhouse Assay

Isolate Bea111 (B. bassiana) and Isa340 (I. javanica) significantly reduced insect populations. Larval mortality differed significantly between treatments and the control group (F2,48 = 12.04, p < 0.05). The first isolate reduced larval infestation by 52% compared to the control group while the second isolate caused a 45% reduction in the initial population. Fungal extrusion occurred on average after 5 days (Table 3). The mean temperature during the assays was 20.5 °C (18.3–24.0 °C) with a minimum of 16.2 °C (16.0–18.0 °C) and a maximum of 31.2 °C (29.7–33.0 °C).

4. Discussion

Several species of entomopathogenic fungi were evaluated for their potential as pest control agents, with promising results of different pests for several crops that have already been extensively studied [25,26,27,28]. However, studies on the biological control of D. fovealis in strawberry crops are new. Our results have indicated that among the 20 surveyed isolates that are pathogenic for D. fovealis, the mortality rates varied between 10% and 89%. Such variation in mortality rates is expected when several isolates obtained from the environment are tested. A similar result was observed in a previous in vitro study using endophytic fungi against D. fovealis larvae, with mortality rates varying between 30% and 80% (109 conidia·mL−1) [9], reinforcing the argument that the use of entomopathogenic fungi may be effective against this pest. Another study that evaluated B. bassiana and M. anisopliae against larvae of Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) also obtained mortality rates varying between 20% and 94% (108 conidia·mL−1) [29].
Although Beauveria caledonica (Bea110) produced over 57% mortality in the pathogenicity tests, this isolate did not present high virulence on D. fovealis, although it had a shorter LT50 of approximately 5 days. This might be due to the ecology of this species since B. caledonica presents a more restricted host relationship with coleopterans. Beauveria caledonica is naturally found in soil and has already been recorded as being highly pathogenic to weevils with mortality rates between 70% and 90% (107 conidia·mL−1) and an average LT50 between 6 and 8 days for Hylobius abietis [30].
In our study, Metarhizium anisopliae isolates induced mortality rates between 10% and 43%, unlike studies on biological control with isolates of M. anisopliae, which reported high mortality rates [31,32]. The low performance of M. anisopliae may be due to the selectivity of certain strains to particular hosts as targets [33]. Other studies using other Lepidoptera species obtained similar results [29].
The isolate Bea111 presented a low value of LC50 compared with the commercial strain Bovemax®. The LC50 found in the present study was similar to other virulence studies using B. bassiana where an average LC50 between 104 and 106 conidia·mL−1 was found [25,34].
Isaria javanica Isa340 presented the lowest LC50 value among all evaluated isolates, reinforcing the great potential of this entomopathogenic genus for pest control. The genus Isaria is considered highly virulent for hosts of several orders of insects [35]. Studies on Isaria fumosorosea against larvae of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) [36] and Isaria poprawskii against nymphs of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) [37] showed LC50 close to the values observed in our study.
Most entomopathogenic fungi perform notably well under laboratory conditions and high levels of mortality can be observed for most insect targets under such controlled conditions. An unfortunate consequence of such reports is that this establishes unrealistic expectations regarding the performance of these agents in the field. Variations in temperature, humidity, and exposure to UV-irradiation are amongst some of the important abiotic factors that can significantly impact the efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi in field applications [15]. Our results under greenhouse conditions also confirmed the performance of isolates Bea111 and Isa340, which induced mortality rates between 45% and 52%. In addition, the behavior presented by larvae of D. fovealis, which lodges itself at the base of the strawberry plants [4], along with the plant structure itself, may construct a favorable habitat that contributes to the effectiveness of the pathogens [38]. Several species of entomopathogenic fungi have been evaluated as pest control agents under laboratory and greenhouse conditions or directly in the field, with promising results in different pests of several crops that were already widely studied [25,26,27,28,39]. However, this is the first report on evaluations of soil-borne entomopathogens against D. fovealis in these conditions.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our results indicate that isolates Beauveria bassiana Bea111 and Isaria javanica Isa340 are strong candidates for further evaluation in the control of Duponchelia fovealis and present good potential for the development of products as mycoinsecticides. Our results represent the first report of entomopathogenic fungi isolated from soil infecting D. fovealis, and the basis for future studies to design a biological control program in strawberry crops.

Author Contributions

R.F.A., A.S.P., I.C.P. conceived and designed the experiments; R.F.A. and C.G.P. performed the experiments; R.F.A. and A.S.P. analyzed the data; I.C.P., M.A.C.Z. and A.S.P. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; R.F.A., A.S.P., I.C.P., M.A.C.Z. and C.G.P. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Bioagro, Araucária-PR for providing seedlings; PROEXT MEC Sesu and CNPq for financial support; and CAPES Foundation for the fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Franco, C.M.; Baptista, M. Duponchelia fovealis Zeller-nova praga em Portugal. Revista Frutas, Legumes e Flores 2010, 110, 34–35. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonsignore, C.P.; Vacante, V. Emerging insects and pests in southern Italy. Protezione delle Colture 2009, 4, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  3. Efil, E.; Özgür, O.; Efıl, F. New pest, Duponchelia fovealis Zeller on strawberries in Turkey—Damage, distribution and parasitoid. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2014, 2, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zawadneak, M.A.C.; Gonçalves, R.B.; Pimentel, I.C.; Schuber, J.M.; Santos, B.; Poltronieri, A.S.; Solis, M.A. First record of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in South America. Idesia 2016, 34, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. CABI International. Available online: http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/20168 (accessed on 14 March 2018).
  6. Stocks, S.D.; Hodges, A. A European Pepper Moth or Southern European Marsh Pyralid Duponchelia fovealis (Zeller). 2014. Available online: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN91000.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2017).
  7. Zawadneak, M.A.C.; Botton, M.; Schuber, J.M.; Santos, B.; Vidal, H.R. Pragas do morangueiro. In Como Produzir Morangos, 1st ed.; Zawadneak, M.A.C., Schuber, J.M., Mógor, A.F., Eds.; Editora UFPR: Curitiba, Brazil, 2014; pp. 101–145. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rodrigues, R.; Jaras, L.I.; Poltronieri, A.S.; Pimentel, I.C.; Zawadneak, M.A.C. Seletividade de inseticidas reguladores de crescimento e botânico no parasitismo de três espécies de Trichogramma em ovos de Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). EntomoBrasilis 2017, 10, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amatuzzi, R.F.; Cardoso, N.; Poltronieri, A.S.; Poitevin, C.G.; Dalzoto, P.; Zawadeneak, M.A.; Pimentel, I.C. Potential of endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Duponchelia fovealis (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Braz. J. Biol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Keller, S.; Zimmermann, G. Mycopathogens of Soil Insects, 1st ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1989; pp. 240–270. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gonzalez, F.; Tkaczuk, C.; Dinu, M.M.; Fiedler, Z.; Vidal, S.; Zchori-Fein, E.; Messelink, G.J. New opportunities for the integration of microorganisms into biological pest control systems in greenhouse crops. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. McCoy, C.W. Entomogenous fungi as microbial pesticides. In New Directions in Biological Control; Baker, R.R., Dunn, P.E., Alan, R.L., Eds.; Wiley-Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 139–159. [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberts, D.W.; Leger, R.J. Metarhizium spp., cosmopolitan insect-pathogenic fungi: Mycological aspects. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alves, S.B.; Lopes, R.B.; Vieira, A.S.; Tamai, M.A. Fungos entomopatogênicos usados no controle de pragas na América Latina. In Controle Microbiano de Pragas na América Latina—Avanços e Desafios, 1st ed.; Alves, S.B., Lopes, R.B., Eds.; Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2008; pp. 69–110. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ortiz-Urquiza, A.; Luo, Z.; Keyhani, N.O. Improving mycoinsecticides for insect biological control. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lacey, L.A. Microbial Control of Insect and Mite Pests from Theory to Practice, 1st ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; p. 482. [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomas, S.R.; Elkinton, J.S. Pathogenicity and virulence. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2004, 85, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zawadneak, M.A.C.; Gonçalves, R.B.; Poltronieri, A.S.; Santos, B.; Bischoff, A.M.; Borba, A.M.; Pimentel, I.C. Biological parameters of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) reared in the laboratory on two diets. Eur. J. Entomol. 2017, 114, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alves, S.B.; Moraes, S.A. Quantificação de inoculo de patógenos de insetos. In Controle Microbiano de Inseto, 2nd ed.; Alves, S.B., Ed.; Piracicaba Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz: Piracicaba, Brazil, 1998; Volume 1, pp. 765–778. [Google Scholar]
  20. Goettel, M.S.; Inglis, G.D. Fungi: Hyphomycetes. In Manual of Techiniques in Insect Pathology, 1st ed.; Lacey, L.A., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1997; pp. 213–250. [Google Scholar]
  21. Peixoto, N.P.A.S.; Azevedo, J.L.; Araújo, W.L. Microrganismos Endofíticos Revista Biotecnologia Biotecnologia; Ciência & Desenvolvimento: Brasília, Brazil, 2002; pp. 62–76. [Google Scholar]
  22. Abbott, W.S.A. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 58, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. LeOra Software. Polo Plus Probit and Logit Analysis; Version 1.0; LeOra Software: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  24. Henderson, C.F.; Tilton, E.W. Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 1955, 48, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wraight, S.P.; Ramos, M.E.; Avery, P.B.; Jaronski, S.T.; Vandenberg, J.D. Comparative virulence of Beauveria bassiana isolates against lepidopteran pests of vegetable crops. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2010, 103, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Batta, Y.S. Efficacy of endophytic and applied Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch.) Sorokin (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against larvae of Plutella xylostella L. (Yponomeutidae: Lepidoptera) infesting Brassica napus plants. Crop Prot. 2013, 44, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reddy, G.V.P.; Zhao, Z.; Humber, R.A. Laboratory and field efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi for the management of the sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 122, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Castro, T.; Mayerhofer, J.; Enkerli, J.; Eilenberg, J.; Meyling, N.V.; Moral, R.A.; Demétrio, C.G.B.; Delalibera, I. Persistence of Brazilian isolates of the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and M. robertsii in strawberry crop soil after soil drench application. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 233, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Godonou, I.; Jamesa, B.; Atcha-Ahowéa, C.; Vodouhèb, S.; Kooymanc, C.; Ahanchédéb, A.; Koriea, S. Potential of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae isolates from Benin to control Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Crop. Prot. 2009, 28, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Glare, T.R.; Reay, S.D.; Nelson, T.L.; Moore, R. Beauveria caledonica is a naturally occurring pathogen of forest beetles. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hussain, A.; Tian, M.Y.; He, Y.R.; Ahmed, S. Entomopathogenic fungi disturbed the larval growth and feeding performance of Ocinara varians Walker (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) larvae. Insect Sci. 2009, 16, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nussenbaum, A.L.; Lecuona, R.E. Selection of Beauveria bassiana sensu lato and Metarhizium anisopliae sensu lato isolates as microbial control agents against the boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) in Argentina. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 110, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schrank, A.; Vainstein, M.H. Metarhizium anisopliae enzymes and toxins. Toxicon 2010, 56, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Quesada-Moraga, E.; Maranhao, E.A.A.; Valverde-García, P.; Santiago-Álvarez, C. Selection of Beauveria bassiana isolates for control of the whiteflies Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum on the basis of their virulence, thermal requirements and toxicogenic activity. Biol. Control 2006, 36, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zimmermann, G. The entomopathogenic fungi Isaria farinosa (formerly Paecilomyces farinosus) and the Isaria fumosorosea species complex (formerly Paecilomyces fumosoroseus): Biology, ecology and use in biological control. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2008, 18, 865–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, Z.; Ali, S.; Ren, S.X.; Wu, J.H. Effect of Isaria fumosoroseus on mortality and fecundity of Bemisia tabaci and Plutella xylostella. Insect Sci. 2010, 17, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cabanillas, H.E.; Jones, W.A. Pathogenicity of Isaria poprawskii (Ascomycota: Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) against the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), under laboratory conditions. Crop Prot. 2013, 50, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shipp, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Hunt, D.W.A.; Ferguson, G. Influence of humidity and greenhouse microclimate on the efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) for control of greenhouse arthropod pests. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 1154–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Senthil, K.C.M.; Jacob, T.K.; Devasahayam, S.; D’Silva, S.; Nandeesh, P.G. Characterization and virulence of Beauveria bassiana associated with auger beetle (Sinoxylon anale) infecting allspice (Pimenta dioica). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016, 139, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 09 00070 g001 550
Figure 1. Adjusted mortality rate (mean ± SE) of third instar larvae of D. fovealis 7 days after inoculation with conidial suspensions (109 conidia·mL−1) of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates from different soils. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different according to the Tukey test (p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Adjusted mortality rate (mean ± SE) of third instar larvae of D. fovealis 7 days after inoculation with conidial suspensions (109 conidia·mL−1) of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates from different soils. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different according to the Tukey test (p < 0.01).
Insects 09 00070 g001
Insects 09 00070 g002 550
Figure 2. Adjusted mortality of third instar larvae of Duponchelia fovealis after inoculation with varying concentrations of conidia of five strains of entomopathogenic fungi: B. bassiana Bea1 and Bea111, B. caledonica Bea110, I. javanica Isa340, and Bovemax CG716. Error bars represent confidence intervals at 95%. Tukey test was performed separately for each concentration and bars with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Adjusted mortality of third instar larvae of Duponchelia fovealis after inoculation with varying concentrations of conidia of five strains of entomopathogenic fungi: B. bassiana Bea1 and Bea111, B. caledonica Bea110, I. javanica Isa340, and Bovemax CG716. Error bars represent confidence intervals at 95%. Tukey test was performed separately for each concentration and bars with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.001).
Insects 09 00070 g002
Table
Table 1. Entomopathogenic fungi isolates tested against Duponchelia fovealis and the GenBank accession numbers for their respective ITS sequences.
Table 1. Entomopathogenic fungi isolates tested against Duponchelia fovealis and the GenBank accession numbers for their respective ITS sequences.
SpeciesIsolateGenBankSoil SourceCoordinates and Sites
Beauveria bassianaBea1KY471,648Conventional corn (Zea mays) crop systems25°53′190″ S, 49°43′195″ W Araucária
Bea2KY471,649
Bea3KY471,650
Bea4KY471,651
Bea5KY471,652
Beauveria caledonicaBea110KY471,655Conventional strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) crop systems25°53′376″ S, 49°44′654″ W Araucária
Beauveria bassianaBea111KY471,653Conventional corn (Zea mays) crop systems
A2BKY471,654
Lecanicillium sp.In1KY471,666Organic strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) crop systems25°74′010″ S, 49°89′425″ W Lapa
Metarhizium anisopliae104KY471,656Native forest25°34′154″ S, 48°90′083″ W Morretes
107KY471,657
Isaria javanicaIsa340KY488,507
Metarhizium anisopliae110BKY471,658Banana trees (Musa spp.) in native forest25°38′776″ S, 48°86′026″ W Morretes
110CKY471,659
110DKY471,660
315KY471,661
381KY471,662
399AKY471,663
399BKY471,664
399CKY471,665
Table
Table 2. Probit regression analysis of the mortality and log-concentration for different entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates against third instar larvae of D. fovealis.
Table 2. Probit regression analysis of the mortality and log-concentration for different entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates against third instar larvae of D. fovealis.
TreatmentBea1Bea110Bea111Isa340CG716
Number of larvae601557609645432
LC509.5 × 1083.85 × 1082.33 × 1069.69 × 1051.41 × 107
Slope (SE)0.24 ± 0.060.25 ± 0.050.51 ± 0.040.37 ± 0.030.21 ± 0.05
95% FL3.7 × 108–5.09 × 1095.13 × 107–5.6 × 1098.88 × 105–5.34 × 1065.79 × 105–3.12 × 1064.48 × 106–8.38 × 107
χ2 (df = 4)2.561.273.652.770.29
LT50 (Days)7.15.37.26.47.5
Slope (SE)
95% FL		2.10 ± 0.27
6.0 to 9.0		2.16 ± 0.25
4.6 to 6.2		3.13 ± 0.38
6.4 to 8.6		2.81 ± 0.30
5.4 to 8.3		2.75 ± 0.39
6.4 to 9.6
Table
Table 3. Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Bea111) and Isaria javanica (Isa340) after 7 days of treatment on third instar larvae of Duponchelia fovealis in strawberry plants in greenhouse conditions. Values followed by the same letters are not significantly different according to the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Bea111) and Isaria javanica (Isa340) after 7 days of treatment on third instar larvae of Duponchelia fovealis in strawberry plants in greenhouse conditions. Values followed by the same letters are not significantly different according to the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
TreatmentN° Initial Larvae% Efficacy (SE)
Bea111 (2 × 106) *19752.68 (6.23) a
Isa340 (9 × 105) *19645.83 (7.79) a
Control19917.41 (3.11) b
* Concentration (conidia·mL−1).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amatuzzi, R.F.; Poitevin, C.G.; Poltronieri, A.S.; Zawadneak, M.A.C.; Pimentel, I.C. Susceptibility of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Soil-Borne Entomopathogenic Fungi. Insects 2018, 9, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020070

AMA Style

Amatuzzi RF, Poitevin CG, Poltronieri AS, Zawadneak MAC, Pimentel IC. Susceptibility of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Soil-Borne Entomopathogenic Fungi. Insects. 2018; 9(2):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amatuzzi, Rafaela F., Carolina G. Poitevin, Alex S. Poltronieri, Maria A. C. Zawadneak, and Ida C. Pimentel. 2018. "Susceptibility of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Soil-Borne Entomopathogenic Fungi" Insects 9, no. 2: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020070

APA Style

Amatuzzi, R. F., Poitevin, C. G., Poltronieri, A. S., Zawadneak, M. A. C., & Pimentel, I. C. (2018). Susceptibility of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Soil-Borne Entomopathogenic Fungi. Insects, 9(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop