Behavioral Responses and Contact Toxicity of Australian Tea Tree Oil and Its Major Constituents Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Plants and Reagents
2.1.2. Insect Rearing
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis
2.2.2. Preparation of Test Solutions
2.2.3. Behavioral Assay
2.2.4. Contact Toxicity Assay
2.2.5. Data Processing and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Chemical Composition of TTO
3.2. Behavioral Effects of TTO and Its Major Components on Adult D. citri
3.3. Contact Toxicity of TTO and Its Components Against D. citri
3.4. Contact Toxicity of TTO vs. Conventional Insecticides
4. Discussion
4.1. Variation in Essential Oil Composition and Activity
4.2. Differential Repellent and Toxic Activities
4.3. Development Prospects of TTO
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| GC-MS | Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry |
| HLB | Huanglongbing |
| TTO | Tea tree oil |
References
- Li, L.Y. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Citrus Huanglongbing Disease Control in Guilin, Guangxi. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J.H.; Huang, Z.D.; Zhang, M.R.; Zhang, N.; Li, P.; Lu, L.; Yang, X. The biological research progress and prevention of Asian citrus psyllid. Plant Quar. 2018, 32, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, Y.C. Sensitivity of Citrus Psyllid Field Population to Insecticides and the Development of Pesticides Selected Kits. Master’s Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.J.; Fang, Y.L.; Sun, H.L.; Zhou, Q. Research progress in insecticide resistance of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Insect Res. Cent. China 2025, 19, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Song, X.B.; Cui, Y.P.; Peng, A.T.; Ling, J.F.; Chen, X. Resistance to commonly used insecticides of Diaphorina citri field populations in Zhaoqing city, Guangdong Province. J. Environ. Entomol. 2021, 43, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, Y.Y.; Sun, Y.; Zou, Z.W.; Huang, S.J. Resistance of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama to five conventional insecticides in Jiangxi province. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2022, 59, 419–425. [Google Scholar]
- Schnee, C.; Köllner, T.G.; Held, M.; Turlings, T.C.J.; Gershenzon, J.; Degenhardt, J. The products of a single maize sesquiterpene synthase form a volatile defense signal that attracts natural enemies of maize herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.M.; Zeng, X.N.; Zaka, S.M.; Cen, Y.J. Influence of the essential oil of guava leaves on the feeding behavior of the Asian citrus psyllid. J. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 32, 483–487. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.Z.; Liu, Y.M.; Li, S.M.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, W. Chemical composition of essential oil of the invasive plant Praxelis clematidea and its repellence and lethality to Diaphorina citri. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2018, 55, 117–125. [Google Scholar]
- Khalil, M.; Khizar, M.; Alshaya, D.S.; Hameed, A.; Muhammad, N.; Binyameen, M.; Azeem, M.; Hussain, M.; Abbas, Q.; Attia, K.A.; et al. Insecticidal and Repellent Activity of Essential Oils from Seven Different Plant Species against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Insects 2024, 15, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedini, S.; Cosci, F.; Tani, C.; Pierattini, E.C.; Venturi, F.; Lucchi, A.; Ioriatti, C.; Ascrizzi, R.; Flamini, G.; Ferroni, G.; et al. Essential Oils as Post-Harvest Crop Protectants against the Fruit Fly Drosophila suzukii: Bioactivity and Organoleptic Profile. Insects 2020, 11, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.M.; Nie, R.R.; Fu, Y.R.; Liao, Y.Y.; Chen, B.K.; Zhang, Q.W.; Ji, Q.H.; Guo, Y.J. Biological Functions of the Active Components of Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil and Their Applications in Agricultural Pest Control. Plant Dis. Pests 2025, 16, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Batish, D.R.; Singh, H.P.; Kohli, R.K.; Kaur, S. Eucalyptus essential oil as a natural pesticide. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palermo, D.; Giunti, G.; Laudani, F.; Palmeri, V.; Campolo, O. Essential oil-based nano-biopesticides: Formulation and bioactivity against the confused flour beetle Tribolium confusum. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 4730:2017; Essential Oil of Melaleuca, Terpinen-4-ol Type (Tea Tree Oil). International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- GB/T 26514-2011; General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China; Standardization Administration of China. Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil, Terpinen-4-ol Chemotype: GB/T 26514-2011. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2011.
- Ye, Z.D.; Lin, Z.Y.; Yang, C.Y.; Cai, H.D.; Han, Q.X. Effect of Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel and Its Volatile Compounds on Behavior of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Its Application. Plant Health Med. 2024, 3, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Y.F.; Qin, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.N.; Chen, B.W.; Liang, Z.Y.; Qin, Y.F.; Yan, C.; Liu, H.L. Essential Oils in Parts of Melaleuca alternifolia Plant. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 35, 957–963. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, L.N.; Zhong, J.M.; Ling, S.Q.; Xu, J.Z.; Ruan, Z.J.; Yang, H.; Hou, C.; Li, Z.Q.; Lin, Z.Y.; Qiu, H.L. Repellent effect of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil on Solenopsis invicta Buren and identification of active components. J. Environ. Entomol. 2024, 46, 1224–1232. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, M. Studies on the Toxicity and Insecticidal Mechanism of the Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil Against Stored-Product Insect Pests. Ph.D. Thesis, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Y.; Zhu, M.; Qiu, B.; Ali, S.; Wu, J. Insecticidal Effect of Lemongrass Essential Oil Against Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall). Agronomy 2025, 15, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mann, R.S.; Kaufman, P.E.; Butler, J.F. Repellency and toxicity of plant-based essential oils and their constituents against Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2012, 136, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziągwa-Becker, M.; Oleszek, M. Is the Biopesticide from Tea Tree Oil an Effective and Low-Risk Alternative to Chemical Pesticides? A Critical Review. Molecules 2024, 29, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regnault-Roger, C.; Vincent, C.; Arnason, J.T. Essential oils in insect control: Low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012, 57, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, M.; Feng, C.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, X.H.; Cai, H.Z.; Zhan, G. Preparation, Characterization and in Vitro Release Characteristics of Sustained-Release Chitosan Microcapsules Containing Tea Tree Oil. Food Sci. 2019, 40, 242–248. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.H.; Chen, H.P.; Cao, C.; Zhao, P.Y.; Li, F.M.; Huang, Q.L.; Cao, L.D. Research progress of nanoemulsion of pesticides. J. Pestic. Sci. 2022, 24, 1340–1357. [Google Scholar]





| Treatment | Conc. 1 (g/L) | Conc. 2 (g/L) | Conc. 3 (g/L) | Conc. 4 (g/L) | Conc. 5 (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTO | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 8.12 | 16.25 | 24.37 | 32.5 | 40.62 |
| γ-Terpinene | 4.29 | 8.58 | 12.88 | 17.17 | 21.46 |
| α-Terpinene | 2.09 | 4.18 | 6.27 | 8.36 | 10.45 |
| α-Terpineol | 1.28 | 2.56 | 5.12 | 5.12 | 6.4 |
| p-Cymene | 1.27 | 2.53 | 3.8 | 5.06 | 6.33 |
| λ-Cyhalothrin | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Abamectin | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Biphenyl·thiamethoxam | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | - |
| No. | Retention Time (min) | Compound | Molecular Formula | Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.174 | Pinene | C10H16 | 3.81 |
| 2 | 8.579 | α-Terpinene | C10H16 | 10.45 |
| 3 | 8.808 | p-Cymene | C10H14 | 6.33 |
| 4 | 8.968 | D-Limonene | C10H16 | 2.35 |
| 5 | 9.071 | 1,8-Cineole | C10H18O | 2.92 |
| 6 | 9.918 | γ-Terpinene | C10H16 | 21.46 |
| 7 | 10.814 | Terpinolene | C10H16 | 2.75 |
| 8 | 14.105 | Terpinen-4-ol | C10H18O | 40.62 |
| 9 | 14.558 | α-Terpineol | C10H18O | 6.40 |
| 10 | 23.579 | Aromadendrene | C15H24 | 2.18 |
| 11 | 25.902 | Ledene | C15H24 | 0.49 |
| 12 | 30.215 | Globulol | C15H26O | 0.24 |
| Treatment | Processing Time (h) | LC50 (g/L) | 95% Confidence Interval (g/L) | Regression Equation (Y=) | χ2 | df | p-Value | Correlation Coefficient (r) | Relative Toxicity (72 h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTO | 24 h | 46.72 | 33.93~57.52 | −8.46 + 5.07x | 2.09 | 3 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.03 |
| 48 h | 33.42 | 20.33~43.73 | −5.92 + 3.89x | 0.81 | 3 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.02 | |
| 72 h | 19.18 | 3.18~28.57 | −4.33 + 3.38x | 3.17 | 3 | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.03 | |
| λ-Cyhalothrin | 24 h | 3.10 | 2.41~5.40 | −1.71 + 3.48x | 0.85 | 3 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.45 |
| 48 h | 2.10 | 1.64~2.76 | −1.18 + 3.66x | 1.06 | 3 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.35 | |
| 72 h | 1.23 | 0.72~1.57 | −0.33 + 3.59x | 1.61 | 3 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.48 | |
| Abamectin | 24 h | 1.77 | 1.29~10.68 | −0.98 + 3.94x | 0.36 | 3 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.80 |
| 48 h | 1.26 | 0.98~2.17 | −0.38 + 3.80x | 0.66 | 3 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.59 | |
| 72 h | 0.93 | 0.76~1.22 | 0.14 + 4.40x | 1.34 | 3 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.63 | |
| Biphenyl·thiamethoxam | 24 h | 1.41 | 0.66~1.81 | −0.54 + 3.66x | 0.86 | 2 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 48 h | 0.74 | - | 0.29 + 2.13x | 1.63 | 2 | 0.44 | 0.80 | 1.00 | |
| 72 h | 0.59 | - | 0.78 + 3.36x | 0.65 | 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yang, F.; Liao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Nie, R.; Fu, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, Q. Behavioral Responses and Contact Toxicity of Australian Tea Tree Oil and Its Major Constituents Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Insects 2026, 17, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17040355
Yang F, Liao Y, Guo Y, Nie R, Fu Y, Chen B, Zhang Q, Ji Q. Behavioral Responses and Contact Toxicity of Australian Tea Tree Oil and Its Major Constituents Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Insects. 2026; 17(4):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17040355
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Fengmei, Yuyun Liao, Yanjun Guo, Ranran Nie, Yourong Fu, Bingkun Chen, Qiwei Zhang, and Qianhua Ji. 2026. "Behavioral Responses and Contact Toxicity of Australian Tea Tree Oil and Its Major Constituents Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama" Insects 17, no. 4: 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17040355
APA StyleYang, F., Liao, Y., Guo, Y., Nie, R., Fu, Y., Chen, B., Zhang, Q., & Ji, Q. (2026). Behavioral Responses and Contact Toxicity of Australian Tea Tree Oil and Its Major Constituents Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Insects, 17(4), 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17040355
