Next Article in Journal
Effects of Corcyra cephalonica Egg Consumption on Population Fitness and Reproduction of the Whitefly Predator Serangium japonicum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Decoding Biodiversity in Baiyangdian Lake: A DNA Barcode Reference Library for Aquatic Insects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of Biological Control in Management of Invasive Exotic Arthropod Pests and Weeds in India

by
Rangaswamy Muniappan
1,*,
Kesavan Subaharan
2,
Krishnan Selvaraj
2,
Muthusamy Sampathkumar
2 and
Satya Nand Sushil
2
1
Center for International Research, Education, and Development, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bellary Road, Bengaluru 560024, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2026, 17(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010061
Submission received: 13 November 2025 / Revised: 17 December 2025 / Accepted: 25 December 2025 / Published: 1 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Simple Summary

Invasive species can cause loss of biodiversity and agricultural productivity, adversely affecting human and environmental health. Biological control of exotic invasive insect pests and weeds has been practiced for more than two centuries in India. It has provided control in the categories of excellent (16), substantial (9), and partial (4) of exotic insect pests and weeds. Further, biological control in association with other components of integrated pest management has contributed to the decline in use of chemical pesticides in the past decade and a half in India, leading to sustainable development and environmental safety.

Abstract

Classical biological control of exotic invasive weeds first took place in India in 1795. Thus far, a total of 174 natural enemies have been imported into India, and out of these, 77 have established themselves in the field. Twelve exotic insect pests and four weeds were successfully controlled with a combination of classical, augmentative, and conservation biological control. Additionally, eight insect pests and one weed were substantially controlled. Augmentative biological control has been adopted as per the needs and availability of resources. Conservation biological control is ubiquitous and has been facilitated by the adoption of integrated pest management. In the past, biological control activities were sporadic; however, since 1977, the Indian Council of Agricultural Research—National Bureau for Agricultural Insect Resources has been regularly implementing classical biological control of invasive agricultural insect pests of economic importance. Unfortunately, the importance given to invasive weeds and insect pests of natural resources has fallen behind in recent years.

1. Introduction

Biological invasions pose a serious threat to biodiversity, agricultural productivity, human health, and environmental stability [1]. The socio-economic impact of biological invasions is staggering. India incurred losses between USD 127.3 billion and USD 182.6 billion from 1960 to 2020, averaging USD 2.1 to USD 3 billion annually. These costs stem from damage to agriculture, forestry, and ecosystems, as well as the expense of managing invasive species [2]. Invasive species often arrive without their natural enemies, giving them a competitive edge over native species. Despite quarantine regulations, their entry continues to rise due to globalization, climate change, migration, plant and animal trade, and other factors. Quarantine measures may delay invasions, but they rarely prevent them. The documentation of common prickly pear Opuntia monocantha (Wildenow) (Haworth) (Cactaceae) from northern India dates to the 1780s. Subsequently, erect prickly pear, Opuntia stricta (Haworth) and red-flower prickly pear, Opuntia elatior (Miller) established in southern India. Lantana (Lantana camara L.) (Verbenaceae) in 1809, Siam weed, Chromolaena odorata (L.) (King and Robinson) (Asteraceae) in the 1840s, and water fern, Salvinia molesta (D.S. Mitchell) (Salvinaceae) were introduced in 1955 [3].
Early records of invasive insect pests accidentally introduced were woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in 1889, coffee green scale, Coccus viridis Green (Hemiptera: Coccidae) in the 1890s, potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea opercullela (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in 1906, San Jose scale, Comstockaspis (=Quadraspidiotus) perniciosa (Comstock) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in 1910, diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in 1914, and cottony cushion scale, Icerya purchasi Maskell (Hemiptera: Monophlebidae) in 1928. In a recent review, Sushil et al. [4] listed 36 invasive insect species in India. To highlight the increase in incidence of invasive species in the past 20 years (2006–2025), a list of 25 species is given in the Supplementary File (Table S1).
Biological control plays a major role in the management of invasive species, and all three strategies of biological control—classical, augmentative, and conservation—have been involved. Classical biological control is a favored frontline strategy for managing invasive species, particularly when their associated natural enemies are present in the native habitats, where these species typically pose no threat. Augmentative control has two strategies: inoculative and inundated release of natural enemies. Agents for augmentative biological control are selected based on their efficacy, biology, ease of rearing, cropping situation, seasonality, and cultural practices. It is adopted to suppress pests after they have established themselves by releasing laboratory-reared natural enemies. Both introduced and native natural enemies, based on their efficacy in tackling a target insect pest or weed, are utilized in this strategy. Conservation biological control involves preserving native, naturalized, and introduced natural enemies by selective use of insecticides, environmental modification by enhancing vegetational diversity, and habitat management [5,6]. While the management of a few species of invaded insect pests could be attributed to conservation biological control, it has most often been associated with classical and augmentative biological control. Here, we present a brief history of biological control action plans implemented in India over the past two centuries. We addressed invasive arthropod pests and weeds, natural enemies introduced, local natural enemies involved, augmentative and conservation biological control activities, notable successes, lessons learned, existing gaps in the system, and potential opportunities for future interventions.

2. Biological Control

2.1. History

Classical biological control of invasive weeds has a long history in India. In 1795, control of O. monocantha) with the introduction of the cochineal insect Dactylopius ceylonicus (Green) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae), which was originally introduced for production of cochineal dye, was serendipitously recognized. This was the first documented record of biological control of an invasive plant in the world [7]. Based on this achievement, D. ceylonicus was formally shipped from India to Sri Lanka for biological control of O. monocantha in 1865, resulting in the first documented intentional transfer of an agent for classical biological control [8]. In the early 1900s, recognizing the seriousness of invasive weeds, the Government of India deputed Mr. Ramachandra Rao from 15 November 1916 to 31 March 1919 to study the distribution and natural enemies of L. camara throughout India and Myanmar [9]. He reported 148 local herbivores, including two fortuitously introduced ones. Subsequently, the lantana pod fly, Ophiomyia lantanae (Froggatt) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) from Hawaii was introduced in 1921 [10]. In 1926, another cochineal insect Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae), was introduced to India from Sri Lanka for control of O. stricta and O. elatior [11]. Afterwards, biological control of invasive weeds was carried out sporadically [12] by the forestry department, the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control (CIBC) (now, the Center for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)) station in India and institutions of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). However, relatively little work has been completed on new introductions of bioagents against weeds since the 1980s [13].
Classical biological control of invasive insect pests in India started when coffee green scale Coccus viridis Green (Hemiptera: Coccidae) was accidentally introduced to southern India in the 1890s. In 1898, Howard O. Newport, a planter and an amateur entomologist from Lower Pulneys, Madurai district in southern India, introduced Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from Australia with the support of the United Planters’ Association of Southern India and the Government of Madras [14] to control C. viridis. In addition to the targeted pest, it has proven to be an effective agent for controlling mealybugs and soft scales [15,16]. In 1929, for control of cottony cushion scale I. purchasi, the Australian lady beetle Novius (Rodolia) cardinalis (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) was introduced via South Africa [17]. The parasitoid, Aphelinus mali (Haldimann) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), was introduced from England in 1930 for control of woolly apple aphid, E. lanigerum [18]. Two parasitoids, Bracon gelechiae (Ashm.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Trichogramma australicum Gir. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), were introduced in 1944 and 1948, respectively, for control of potato tuber moth, P. operculella [17]. From 1957 to 1987, the CIBC sub-station in Bengaluru carried out classical biological control research activities in India, and in 1977, the All India Coordinated Research Project on Biological Control of Crop Pests and Weeds was started, which eventually morphed into ICAR–National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR) to carry out biological control programs. As of 2022, there are 361 biological control laboratories in India, consisting of 35 Central Integrated Pest Management Centers (CIPMCs) and 38 State Biological Control Laboratories (SBCLs) of the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage (DPPQS), 49 Indian Council of Agricultural Research laboratories, 98 state agricultural university laboratories, and 141 private laboratories [19].

2.2. Invasive Insect Pests

Exotic insects and weeds introduced to India are presented below in chronological order of their introduction, with a brief review of exotic natural enemies introduced for their control, and local natural enemies recruited.
Woolly apple aphid, E. lanigerum, native to China, was accidentally introduced to India in 1889. It infests members of the family Rosaceae, with apple being the preferred host. An exotic parasitoid, Aphelinus mali was introduced from England in 1930 [18]. Indian natural enemies of this aphid are Coccinella septempunctata L., Coccinella transversoguttata Faldermann, Priscibrumus uropygialis (Mulsant), Harmonia dimidiata (L.), Chilocorus infernalis Mulsant, Adalia tetraspilota (Hope), Hippodamia variegata (Goeze), Oenopia conglobata L., (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Syrphus spp. (Dipitera: Syrphidae), and Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersons), Chrysopa nigricornis Burmeister (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) [20,21,22]. The exotic parasitoid, A. mali, in association with native natural enemies, is providing substantial suppression of woolly apple aphid.
Coffee green scale, C. viridis, believed to be a native of Brazil, was introduced to southern India in the 1890s. It is a polyphagous pest affecting coffee, avocado, citrus, tea, mango, cassava, guava, and others. To control this pest, Mr. Howard O. Newport introduced C. montrouzieri in 1898 from Australia [14]. No follow-up work was taken up as Mr. Newport left India in 1899; however, in 1951, Puttarudriah et al. [23] found larvae and pupae of C. montrouzieri on the trunks of Araucaria pines around Bengaluru. Later, they also found C. montrouzieri specimens in the collections of the Mysore State Entomology Division that were taken from mealybugs in 1940 in Bengaluru. Indigenous parasitoids observed on C. viridis were Coccophagus ceroplastae (Howard), C. cowperi Girault, and Coccophagus sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphilinidae), Anicetus annulatus (Timberlake), Encyrtus lecaniorum (Mayr), Metaphycus helvolus (Compere), M. lichtensiae (Howard), and M. maculatus Agarwal (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) [24]. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, in association with local natural enemies, has given excellent control of coffee green scale.
Potato tuber moth, P. operculella, a native of the Andes, South America, was introduced to Bangladesh in 1906 on potato seed, imported from Italy [25,26]. It is a major pest of potatoes in both the field and storage. A parasitoid Bracon gelechiae (Ashm.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) was imported from Canada in 1944. In 1948, T. australicum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) (Origin: not known) was released in Nanjangud, Karnataka and Coonoor, Tamil Nadu [17]. In 1964 and 1965, five species of larval parasitoids, namely, Agathis unicolor (Schr.), Apanteles scutellaris Mues., Orgilus lepidus Muesebeck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Campoplex haywardi Blanch., Temelucha sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), and one egg-larval parasitoid, Copidosoma uruguayensis Tach. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from South America and the larval parasitoid Apanteles subandinus Blanchard (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from North America, were introduced from the California (USA) station of CIBC [17]. Additional parasitoids Orgilus parcus (Turner) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and Diadegma stellenboschense Cameron from South Africa and Diadegma raoi Gupta (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from Cyprus were also introduced (year not known) [17]. In 1968, Diadegma turcator Aubert (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from Cyprus was introduced [27]. Chelonus kellieae Marsh (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from Costa Rica in 1978, Copidosoma koehleri (Blanchard) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from Australia in 1976, and Copidosoma desantis (Annecke and Mynhardt) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Peru were introduced [28]. The parasitoid, Chelonus blackburni (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), was introduced from the USA in 1976 by CIBC India [29]. A native parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and the introduced parasitoid C. blackburni are used in augmentative releases for control of P. operculella. Substantial control of potato tuber moth has been achieved with the introduced and native parasitoids.
San Jose scale, C. perniciosa, is native to northern China and North Korea [15]. It appeared in India in 1910, possibly introduced along with the Japanese ornamental plant Chaenomeles (Cydonia) japonica (Thunb.) (Rosaceae) [30]. It is a pest of deciduous fruit trees. Exotic natural enemies introduced were Aphytis diaspidis Howard from the USA in 1960, Aphytis sp. nr. diaspidis How. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) from Japan via USA in 1966, and Encarsia perniciosi (Tower) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), California strain from USA in 1958 and 1959, Chinese and Illinois (USA) strains via Switzerland in 1960, and Russian strain via France in 1960 [27]. Additionally, Chilochorus kuwane Silv. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) (Origin: Japan) and Cybocephalus gibbulus Erickson (Origin: Japan) (Coleoptera: Cybocephalidae) were imported from the CIBC station in Trinidad [17]. Of the two introduced parasitoids, only E. perniciosi was recovered from the field. However, Aphytis sp. proclia group was recorded from field surveys even though it was not intentionally introduced [31]. Local natural enemies, Chilocorus circumdatus Gyllenhal, C. infernalis Mulsant, C. septempunctata, Sticholotis marginalis Crotch (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Aphytis lingnanensis (Compere), Aphytis paramaculicornis (DeBach and Rosen) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), and Azotus kashmirensis Narayanan (Hymenoptera: Azotidae) were reported on this pest from India [31]. Inoculative release of the parasitoids E. perniciosi, A. sp. proclia group, and the coccinellid C. infernalis at the beginning of the spring season has given excellent control of San Jose scale [15,31].
Diamondback moth, P. xylostella, a native of either Europe or South Africa, has established itself all over the world. The moth is a pest of cruciferous crops. It was first reported from India in 1914 [32]. The parasitoid, Diadegma semiclausum (Hellén) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) was introduced to India from Taiwan in 1994. Two egg parasitoids, Trichogrammatoidea bactrae (Nagaraja) from Taiwan [15] and Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) from Canada were introduced in 1992 and 2005, respectively [33]. Exotic parasitoids introduced for other pests, Trichogramma evanescens Westwood, Trichogramma brasiliensis (Ashmead), and Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) were reported to parasitize P. xylostella in India. Cotesia vestalis (Holiday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Oomyzus sokolowskii Kurdjumov (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Diadromus collaris (Gravenhorst), and D. semiclausum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) are the key parasitoids of diamondback moth [27]. These introduced parasitoids have given substantial control of diamondback moth.
Lantana bug/Kew bug (Insignorthezia insignis (Browne)) (Hemiptera: Ortheziidae), a native of the neotropics introduced by accident to Nilgiris, southern India, from Sri Lanka in 1915 [9]. It is a pest of coffee, citrus and several other fruit and vegetable crops. It is also found to colonize weeds such as L. camara, C. odorata, Mikania micrantha Kunth (Asteraceae), and others. The coccinellid beetle, C. montrouzieri, has been reported to feed on this pest [15]. The release of Hyperaspis pantherina Fürsch (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in St. Helena, Hawaii, four African countries and Peru has resulted in substantial control of I. insignis [34,35].
Cottony cushion scale, I. purchasi, native to Australia, was introduced to India in 1928 via Sri Lanka [36]. It is a polyphagous pest of woody plants, notably the genus Citrus. The lady beetle, N. cardinalis, was introduced in 1930 (Origin: Australia) by receiving one consignment from South Africa, and a second one from California (USA) through the Commonwealth Institute of Entomology and a third one from Egypt. Shipments of the parasitoid Cryptochetum iceryae (Williston) (Diptera: Cryptochetidae) were received from California (Origin: Australia) in 1947 and 1948 and its field release did not result in establishment [17]. Local natural enemies found attacking I. purchasi were Novius (Rodolia) fumidus (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) [37], and Stathmopoda melanochra Meyr. (Lepidoptera: Stathmopodidae) [36]. Excellent control of I. purchasi was provided by N. cardinalis in association with local natural enemies.
Codling moth, Laspeyresia (Cydia) pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), native to Europe and Northwestern Asia, was introduced to the Ladakh area of India in 1972 from the northwestern border of Pakistan and Afghanistan [38,39]. It is a serious pest of apple, pear, apricot, and walnut and is still confined to the union territory Ladakh. The egg parasitoid Trichogramma embyrophagum (Hartig) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) was introduced from Germany and France in 1993 and 2007, respectively [33]. Egg parasitoids introduced for other pests including T. evanescens, T. pretiosum [40], and Trichogramma cacoeciae Marchal (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) [39] have also been reported to parasitize this pest.
Brown peach aphid, Pterochloroides persicae (Cholodkovsky) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) a native of China, established in the state of Punjab and the union territory Kashmir in 1970 [41]. Local natural enemies recorded were Harmonia eucharis (Mulsant), C. septempunctata, H. variegata, Oenopia conglobata (L.), Priscibrumus uropygialis (Mulsant), and A. tetraspilota (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and C. zastrowi sillemi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) [42].
Citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hemiptera: Pseudoccocidae) is Asiatic in origin but pantropical in distribution and found in some sub-tropical regions. It was reported from India in 1987 [43]. A parasitoid, Leptomastrix dactylopii Howard (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) of Brazilian origin was introduced to India from Trinidad in 1983 [15]. An indigenous parasitoid Coccidoxenoides peregrinus (Timberlake) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), along with the introduced coccinellid C. montrouzieri were found attacking this mealybug. These three natural enemies have given excellent control of P. citri.
Leucaena psyllid, Heteropsylla cubana (Crawford) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), is a native of Central America introduced to India from Sri Lanka in 1988 [44]. It is a pest of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit (Fabaceae); considered by some to be an invasive plant and others a beneficial fodder plant. Soon after finding H. cubana in India, Curinus coeruleus (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) (Origin: Mexico) was introduced from Thailand in 1988 [45]. Native predators, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Pantala flavescens (Fabricius) (Odonata: Libellulidae), were also reported to feed on this psyllid [46]. Curinus coeruleus alone has given excellent control of H. cubana.
American serpentine leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), a native of the eastern part of the USA was introduced to India in 1990 [47]. The parasitoid, Diglyphus begini (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) was introduced to India from California but it did not establish [48]. Local parasitoids Hemiptarsenus varicornis (Girault) and Chrysonotomyia rexia (Narendran, Galande and Mote) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) have been reported on L. trifolii in India [49]. This pest is under control by the indigenous natural enemies.
Coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a native of West Africa introduced to India from Sri Lanka in 1990 [50]. Two parasitoids, Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem and Prorops nasuta Waterston (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) were imported from Mexico in 1995. Phymastichus coffea LaSalle (Hymenoptera: Eulopidae) and P. nasuta were imported from Colombia in 1999 [51]. Efficacy of these introduced parasitoids is yet to be evaluated.
Spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a native of Central America and the Caribbean region was reported from India in 1994 [52]. Fortuitously introduced parasitoids reported on it are Encarsia guadeloupae Viggiani (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), Encarsia (?) haitiensis (Dozier), and Encarsia dispersa Polaszek (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Viraktamath [48] and Mani and Krishnamoorthy [53] reported native predators Axinoscymnus puttarudriahi Kapur & Munshi, C. sexmaculata, Chilocorus nigrita (Fabricius), C. montrouzieri, Pseudoaspidimerus trinotatus (Thunberg), Serangium parcesetosum Sicard, Scymnus nubilus Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Cybocephalus sp. (Coleoptera: Cybocephalidae), Acletoxenus indicus (Malloch) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Apertochrysa astur (Banks), Mallada boninensis (Okamoto), C. zastrowi sillemi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and Notiobiella sp. (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). Spiralling whitefly has been successfully suppressed by the exotic and native natural enemies.
Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa (Fisher and La Salle) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), is a native of Australia that invaded Villuppuram district of Tamil Nadu, India in 2001 [54]. The parasitoid Quadrastichus mendeli Kim and La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) was imported from Israel in 2008 and field released in 2010 in various parts of India. Also, native parasitoids Megastigmus viggianii (Narendran and Sureshan), Megastigmus dharwadicus (Narendran, Girish Kumar, and Vastrad) (Hymenoptera: Torymidae), and Aprostocetus gala (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) were recorded from Karnataka [54,55,56,57]. Introduced and native parasitoids have effectively suppressed L. invasa.
Sugarcane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera (Zehntner) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a native of Southeast Asia, established in West Bengal in 1958 and later in northeast India [58]. It invaded western India starting with Maharashtra in 2002, and subsequently reached southern India [59]. In 2004, Encarsia flavoscutellum Zehntner (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) was collected from Assam and released in Karnataka and other south Indian states. Local predators Dipha aphidivora (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Micromus igorotus (Banks) (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) and Eupeodes confrater Weidemann (Diptera: Syrphidae) were also recorded [60]. This aphid has been well managed by utilizing native natural enemies.
Erythrina gall wasp, Quadrastichus erythrinae (Kim) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) is a native of Africa. Tanzania is the putative source of the population that invaded Asia and the Pacific. It invaded Kerala, India in 2005 causing galls on leaves and tender stems of Erythrina stricta Roxb, (Fabaceae) [61]. In India, a species of Aprostocetus, previously misidentified as Aprostocetus gala Walker (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), has been recorded as a potential parasitoid of the erythrina gall wasp. The parasitoid, Eurytoma erythrinae (Gates and Delvare) (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) was introduced to Hawaii, where it has provided effective control of the erythrina gall wasp [62]. Considering its host specificity and proven effectiveness, the possibility of introducing it to India may be considered if the damage by erythrina gall wasp persists.
Cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is a native of USA and it reached Punjab, India in 2006 [63] via Pakistan. It is a serious pest of cotton and has been reported on over 200 host plants. A parasitoid Aenasius arizonensis (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from the native region of this mealybug was fortuitously introduced to India in 2009 which provided effective control of this pest [64]. Local natural enemies recorded on this mealybug are Hyperaspis maindroni (Sicard), Brumoides suturalis (Fabricius), C. sexmaculata, C. septempunctata, H. variegata, Nephus regularis (Sicard, Scymnus coccivora (Ayyar), C. montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), C. zastrowi sillemi, Mallada sp., (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Encyrtus aurantii (Geoffroy), Anagyrus mirzai (Agarwal and Alam), Anagyrus kamali Moursi, Anagyrus dactylopii (Howard), Homalotylus albiclavatus (Agarwal), Metaphycus sp., (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), Aprostocetus bangaloricus Narendran (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Chartocerus kerrichi (Agarwal) (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), Pachyneuron leucopiscida (Mani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) [64,65]. Aenasius arizonensis alone has successfully suppressed cotton mealybug infestations.
Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara de Willink) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), native to Mexico, was accidentally introduced to India in 2008 [66]. It is a pest of papaya, mulberry, cassava, and several other crops. Three parasitoids from Puerto Rico of Mexican origin, Acerophagus papayae (Noyes and Schauff), Anagyrus loeckei (Noyes and Menezes), and Pseudleptmastix mexicana (Noyes and Schauff) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), were introduced in 2010, of which A. papayae proved to be effective in suppressing this pest. Local predators Spalgis epius (Westwood) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), C. montrouzieri, Scymnus coccivora Ramakrishna (Ayyar), Nephus regularis (Sicard), and Slipinskiscymnus saciformis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Gitonides sp. (Diptera: Drosophilidae), and chrysopid species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) were reported on this pest [67]. Acerophagus papayae has successfully suppressed papaya mealybug.
Jack Beardsley mealybug, Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (Gimpel and Miller) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is a native of the neotropics recorded in Tamil Nadu, India in 2012 [68]. It is a polyphagous pest of fruit, vegetables, and ornamental crops. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, S. coccivora, N. regularis, S. saciformis and Scymnus spicatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Mallada boninensis (Okamoto) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and S. epius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) have been reported to provide substantial control of this mealybug negating the need for classical biological control [69].
Madeira mealybug, Phenacoccus madeirensis (Green) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is a native of neotropics introduced to India in 2012 [70]. It is a polyphagous pest attacking many ornamental and fruit crops and weeds. Native and naturalized natural enemies recorded were Nephus regularis (Sicard) [71], C. montrouzieri, C. sexmaculata, Scymnus sp., Jauravia sp., Novius (Rodalia) sp., Chilocorus sp. Nephus regualris Sicard (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), S. epius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), C. zastrowi sillemi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Cacoxenus (Gitonides) perspicax (Knab) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Diadiplosis sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) [72], Allotropa sp., (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae), Anagyrus amnestos (Rameshkumar, Noyes, Poorani and Chong), Anagyrus qadrii (Hayat, Alam and Agarwal), A. loecki and Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope (Noyes and Menezes) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) [69]. A combination of both native and naturalized natural enemies are providing substantial control of Madeira mealybug.
Banana skipper, Erionota torus Evans (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) is a native of Southeast Asia. It invaded southern India in 2012 [73]. Egg parasitoids Ooencytus pallidipes (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), Agiommatus sp. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), Anastatus sp. (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), and Telenomus sp. (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae); larval parasitoids Elasmus brevicornis Gahan (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Pediobius sp. nr. elasmi (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Tetrastichus sp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Acropimpla sp. nr. nigroscutis (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), Cotesia sp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae); and the pupal parasitoids Senometopia sp., Winthemia sumatrana (Townsend), and Drino (Palexorista) sp., (Diptera: Tachinidae), Megaselia scalaris (Loew) (Diptera: Phoridae); Brachymeria lasus (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) and an unidentified species of Tachinidae were reported from southern India [74,75]. It is another example of local natural enemies managing an invasive pest.
South American tomato leafminer, Phthorimaea (=Tuta) absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is a native of South America that reached Pune, India in 2014 [76]. Native and naturalized natural enemies of this leafminer recorded were Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae), Trichogramma achaeae (Nagaraja and Nagarkatti), T. pretiosum and T. bactrae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Habrobracon sp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Goniozus sp. (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) [77].
Solanum whitefly, Aleurotrachelus (=Aleurothrixus) trachoides (Back) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is of neotropical origin and a pest of Solanaceae, Verbenaceae, and Convolvulaceae plants, and it was introduced to India in 2014 [78]. Accidentally introduced parasitoid Encarsia cubensis (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) has been recorded on this whitefly [79] and it is providing substantial control.
Tobacco thrips, Thrips parvispinus (Karny) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), a native of southeast Asia, reached India in 2015 [80]. It is polyphagous but causes serious damage to pepper and other crops. A natural enemy Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) has been recorded to feed on this pest [81].
Rugose spiralling whitefly, A. rugioperculatus is a native of Central America that invaded southern India in 2016 [82]. The accidentally introduced parasitoids E. dispersa and Encarsia guadeloupae Viggiani (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) were found parasitizing this pest. Local predators observed on this pest were A. astur (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Cybocephalus sp. (Coleoptera: Cybocephalidae), Diadiplosis sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), Jauravia pallidula Motschulsky, C. sexmaculata, and Stethorus sp. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) [83,84]. This whitefly has been successfully controlled by the exotic and local natural enemies.
Bondar’s nesting whitefly, Paraleyrodes bondari Peracchi (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), of neotropical origin, was reported from India in 2018 [85]. No parasitoids were reported on this whitefly in India [86]. Predators Cybocephalus indicus (Tian and Ramani), Cybocephalus nipponicus Endrödy-Younga (Coleoptera: Cybocephalidae) and Delphastus catalinae (Horn) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) were reported feeding on it [87].
Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), native to the Americas, was introduced to India in 2018 via Africa [88]. Even though it is a polyphagous pest, the population that reached India preferred maize the most. A parasitoid Telenomus remus Nixon (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) introduced from Papua New Guinea to India in 1963 [16] for control of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Achaea janata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) has become a major natural enemy of S. fugiperda, supporting the theory of ‘New Association’ proposed by Hokkanen and Pimentel [89]. In addition, native and naturalized parasitoids include T. chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), C. blackburni, Chelonus formosanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Odentepyris sp. (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), Aleiodes sp., Bracon brevicornis (Wesmael), Coccygidium luteum (Brullé), Coccygidium melleum (Roman), Coccygidium sp., Coccygidium transcaspicum (Kokujev), Glyptapanteles creatonoti (Viereck), Meteorus pulchricornis (Wesmael), Microplitis demolitor (Wilkinson), Snellenius manilae (Ashmead), Euplectrus sp.nr. xanthocephalus Girault (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), Campoletis chlorideae (Uchida), Charops bicolor (Szepligeti), Eriborus sp., Ichneumon promissorius (Erichson), Metopius rufus Ashmead, Netelia sp., Temelucha sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), Exorista sorbillans (Wiedemann), and Exorista xanthaspis (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tachinidae), and predators include Polistes cf. olivaceus (De Geer), Ropalidia brevita (Das and Gupta) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), Cicindela sp. (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae), Brumoides sututralis (F.), C. sexmaculata, Coccinella transversalis (F.), Cycloneda sanguinea (L.), Harmonia octomaculata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Paederus fuscipes Curtis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), Forficula sp. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), Orius sp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), Andrallus spinidens (F.), Eucanthecona furcellata (Wolff), Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), Cosmolestes sp., Rhynocoris fuscipes (F.), Rhynocoris marginatus (F.) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), Oxyopes birmamicus Thorell (Araneae: Oxyopidae), Lycosa sp. (Araneae.: Lycosidae), Marpissa sp., and Rhene flavicomans (Simon) (Araneae: Salticidae) [90]. A combination of native and naturalized natural enemies are providing substantial suppression of the fall armyworm.
Palm infesting whitefly, Aleurotrachelus atratus Hempel (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a native of Brazil reported from India in 2019 [91]. It colonizes more than 110 plant species with preference to plants belonging to the family Arecaceae. The parasitoid E. cubensis, a native of the neotropics accidentally introduced to India, was reported to parasitize this whitefly [92]. Predators, A. astur (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Cybochephalus spp. (Coleoptera: Cybocephalidae), C. nigrita and J. pallidula (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) have been reported [91].
Woolly whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a native of the neotropics reported from India in 2019 [93]. It is a polyphagous species, globally known to feed on 20 different plant families with a preference for citrus and guava. Parasitoid, E. cubensis has been reported on this whitefly [79]. Predators, A. astur (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Acletoxenus indicus (Malloch) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), C. montrouzieri and Scymnus nr. utilis (Hoang) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) have been reported [94]. These natural enemies are providing substantial control of woolly whitefly.
Cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti (Matile-Ferrero) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a native of Brazil was introduced to India in 2020 [95]. The parasitoid Anagyrus lopezi De Santis (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) of South American origin was imported from Benin in 2021 and field released in 2022 [96,97]. Local natural enemies encountered were Hyperaspis maindroni (Sicard), C. sexmaculata, Scymnus coccivora Ramakrishna Ayyar (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), S. epius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), Stathmopoda sp. (Lepidoptera: Stathmopodidae), Nola sp. (Lepidoptera: Nolidae), Anatrachyntis sp. (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae), Mallada desjardinsi (Navas), Aspertochrysa (=Pseudomallada) astur (Banks), (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Carpophilus mutilates (Erichson) (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae), Cardiastethus sp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Indoxysticus sp. (Araneae: Thomisidae) [98]. Introduction of A. lopezi immediately after observing the establishment of P. manihoti resulted not only in successful control of the mealybug but also curtailing associated economic losses.
Walnut leaf miner, Caloptilia roscipennella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), is a leaf-mining moth native to Central and Southern Europe that was recorded from Kashmir, infesting walnut crops and causing leaf damage ranging from 15% to 20% [99]. Several parasitoid species were reared from infested mines, notably of the genus Chrysocharis Förster (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Itoplectis maculator (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). These parasitoids provided effective control of the walnut leaf miner, with parasitization rates reaching up to 70%.
Annona whitefly, Aleurotrachelus anonae (Corbett) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of neotropical origin, was reported from Karnataka, India in 2024 [100]. Parasitism by Encarsia sp. and Eretmocerus sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and predation by Scymnus latemaculatus Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) were reported [100].

2.3. Invasive Weeds

Common prickly pear, O. monocantha, native to southern Brazil and Uruguay, was introduced to India in the 1780s and it became invasive from Punjab to Assam. Introduction of the cochineal insect Dactylopius ceylonicus (Green) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in 1795 from Brazil resulted in successful control of the weed. It became the first documented record of biological control of an alien invasive plant anywhere in the world [7].
Erect prickly pear, O. stricta, originated from Florida and West Indies region, was introduced to India in the mid-1800s. Intentional introduction of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) from Sri Lanka in 1926 resulted in its successful control in Southern India [11].
Red-flower prickly pear, O. elatior is a native of tropical South America, and it was introduced around 1872 (specimen deposited in the Kew Gardens). In 1926, D. opuntiae was intentionally introduced from Sri Lanka for O. elatior control, but this also resulted in successful control of O. stricta [11].
Lantana, L camara is a pantropical weed native to the tropical Americas. It was introduced to India in 1809. Ramachandra Rao (1920) [9] surveyed India and Burma and reported occurrence of 148 local insects on lantana, of which Lantanophaga pusillidactylus (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) and Aspondylia lantanae Felt (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) are fortuitously introduced insects. Muniappan and Viraktamath [101] reported fortuitous establishment of Epinotia lantana (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a native of Mexico in southern India. Exotic natural enemies introduced were Ophiomyia lantanae (Froggatt) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) from Hawaii (Origin: Mexico) in 1921, Teleonemia scrupulosa Stål (Hemiptera: Tingidae) from Australia in 1941, Uroplata girardi Pic. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in 1969, Octotoma scabripennis Guerin (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from Australia in 1971 [101]. These natural enemies have provided only partial control of lantana due to various abiotic and biotic factors.
Crofton weed, Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) (King and Robinson) (Asteraceae) is a native of Central America, and it was introduced to India in the early twentieth century. A gall fly Procecidochares utilis (Stone) (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Mexico was introduced to India in 1963 [17]. It has established in hill stations in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal and spread from India to Nepal [102] and even crossed the Himalaya and reached China in 1984 [103]. Despite heavy parasitism by indigenous natural enemies, it has provided partial control of Crofton weed [104].
Siam weed, C. odorata, is a native of the neotropics introduced to India in the early 1840s through the botanical garden in Kolkata. A coffee planter Mr. Kalappa in Coorg upon finding C. odorata in his estate convinced Government of Karnataka to support a biological control project to manage it. At the request of Government of Karnataka, CIBC initiated a project resulting in the introduction of Parachaetes pseudoinsulata (Rego Barros) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) into Karnataka, India in 1970 from Trinidad [105]. Additionally, a shipment P. pseudoinsulata was received from Sri Lanka in 1984, cultured and field released [106]. Sporadic occurrence of P. pseudoinsulata and defoliation of C. odorata have been reported from Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu [107,108]. The eriophyid mite, Acalitus adoratus (Keifer) (Acari: Eriophyidae) was fortuitously introduced to India in 2000 [109]. The gall fly Cecidochares connexa (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae) was introduced into Karnataka in 2002 from Indonesia [110]. Later it was introduced to Kerala and Chhattisgarh [111]. Orimyrus orientalis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Ormyridae) has been found to parasitize C. connexa at moderate to high levels [112]. Parachaetes pseudoinsulata and C. connexa have partially suppressed the Siam weed.
Parthenium, Parthenium hysterophorus L. (Asteraceae), is a native of Mexico, introduced to India in the 1950s. The natural enemy Calligrapha (=Zygogramma) bicolorata (Pallister) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was introduced to Bengaluru in 1984 [113]. It has spread all over India and moved to neighboring countries Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Fortuitously introduced Winter rust Puccinia abrupta var. partheniicola (Pucciniaceae) has been reported to occur sporadically in southern India from the 1980s [114]. Calligrapha bicolorata has substantially controlled parthenium, however, introduction of additional natural enemies should be considered for effective suppression.
Water hyacinth, Pontederia (=Eichhornia) crassipes (Pontederiaceae) is a native of Brazil and it was introduced to Calcutta Botanical Gardens in 1890 as an ornamental plant. Currently, it has spread to all water bodies and rivers in India [115]. Three natural enemies Neochetina bruchi Hustache, Neochetina eichhorniae (Warner) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Orthogalumna terebrantis Wallwork (Acarina: Galumnidae) of South American origin were introduced to India from USA [116]. The mite and weevils were released in 1982 and 1983, respectively. These natural enemies have partially suppressed water hyacinth.
Water fern, S. molesta, is an aquatic weed, and it is a native of south-eastern Brazil [117]. It was first observed in the 1955 in Vali Lake, Trivandrum, Kerala in India [15,118]. A grasshopper, Paulinia acuminata De Geer (Orthoptera: Acrididae) was introduced from Trinidad in 1974 but was not effective [117,119]. The weevil Cyrtobagous salviniae (Calder and Sands) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) of Brazilian origin was imported from Australia to Bengaluru in 1982 and field released in Kerala, Jammu and Kashmir, Bhubaneshwar, and Hyderabad in 1983 [15]. Further releases of C. salviniae were made in Padua village of Katni district in December 2019 [120] and Satpura water reservoir at Sarni in October 2022 [121] in Madhya Pradesh; Chandpur and Gadchiroli districts in Maharashtra in January 2022 [122]; and Tulpuri lake in Durg district, Chhattisgarh [120]. Excellent control of S. molesta was achieved by introducing C. salviniae.
Water lettuce, Pistia stratioides L. (Araceae), has unknown origin, and it has been speculated to be from Africa, Asia, or South America. It is a monocotyledonous aquatic weed and occurs in water bodies and rivers all over India. A local insect, Spodoptera pectinicornis (Hampson) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), native to South Asia, has been reported to cause extensive damage to this weed in Kerala, India [27]. It has been mass-reared and released in the fields for control of this weed in Thailand [123]. In 1982, a weevil Neohydronomus affinis (Hustache) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) was introduced to Australia from Brazil and it has provided effective control [124]. India may introduce N. affinis if P. stratioides is still considered as a problem.
Mile-a-minute vine, Mikania micrantha (Kunth) (Asteraceae), is a native of Caribbean islands introduced through Kew to Kolkata botanical garden in the early 1900s [125]. A rust fungus Puccinia spegazzinii (Uredinales: Pucciniaceae) was released in Assam and Kerala in July 2005 but failed to establish even though it established in Taiwan, Papua New Guinea, and Fiji [126,127].
Giant sensitive plant, Mimosa diplotricha C. (Wright ex Saivalle) (Mimosaceae), is a native of Central America to Brazil and it has been reported from Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Assam, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Nagaland, and Tripura in India [128,129]. No classical biological control action has been taken on this weed in India. It has been successfully controlled with the introduction of a natural enemy Heteropsylla spinulosa (Muddiman, Hodkinson and Hollis) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in some Pacific Island countries and Australia [130].

2.4. Classical Biological Control

Successful control of the invasive weeds includes control of O. monocantha in northern India by the serendipitous introduction of D. ceylonicus in 1795 led to the idea of using insects for control of weeds [7]. Subsequently, control of the cactuses, O. stricta and O. elatior in southern India was achieved by the intentional introduction of D. opuntiae from Sri Lanka in 1926 [11]. The invasive water fern, S. molesta was successfully controlled in the states of Kerala, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra by the introduction of the weevil C. salviniae from Australia in 1982 [118]. Substantial control of the weed parthenium P. hysterophorus has been achieved by introducing C. bicolorata [131]. Only partial control of the weeds, A. adinophora, C. odorata and P. crassipes have been achieved.
Invasive pests of temperate fruit crops, woolly apple aphid E. lanigerum, and San Jose scale C. perniciosa are under control by the introduced natural enemies, but there is a need for inoculative release of their natural enemies early in the spring to catch up with the host population that emerges from diapause. Invasive pests of tropical crops, coffee green scale C. viridis, cottony cushion scale I. purchasi, Leucaena psyllid H. cubana, citrus mealybug P. citri, eucalyptus gall wasp L. invasa, papaya mealybug P. marginatus, and cassava mealybug P. manihoti, are successfully controlled by the intentionally introduced natural enemies requiring minimal or no additional efforts [15,45,54,67]. Successful control of cotton mealybug P. solenopsis has been achieved by the fortuitously introduced parasitoid A. arizonensis [64]. Additionally, accidentally introduced parasitoids E. cubensis, E. dispersa, E. guadeloupae, and E. haitiensis have been providing effective control of invasive whiteflies spiralling whitefly A. dispersus, and rugose spiralling whitefly A. rugioperculatus, and substantial control of solanum whitefly A. trachoides, and woolly whitefly A. floccosus [48,79,83,84,132]. Substantial control of potato tuber moth P. operculella, and diamondback moth, P. xylostella were achieved with the introduced natural enemies [22,26,28,31]. Palm infesting whitefly A. atratus, Madeira mealybug P. madeirensis and Jack Beardsley mealybug P. jackbeardsleyi are substantially controlled by accidentally introduced and native natural enemies [69,72,79,92]. There has always been varying degrees of association between local natural enemies and introduced natural enemies in managing invasive insect pests. Number of natural enemies intentionally and fortuitously introduced and local natural enemies attacking various invasive insect pests and weeds are given in Table 1.
Within India, parasitoids, E. flavoscutellum and O. pallidipes intentionally transferred from the northeastern region to the southern region for control of sugarcane woolly aphid, C. lanigera and banana skipper, E. torus, respectively, have given satisfactory control of both pests [60,74].
Few of the introduced natural enemies have extended their host range beyond their intended target(s) controlling additional introduced exotic pests. The coccinellid beetle C. montrouzieri introduced for control of coffee green scale C. viridis is also providing control of several introduced and native mealybugs and scale insects, spherical mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead), hibiscus mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), coffee mealybug Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell), striped mealybug Ferrisia virgata Cockerell, mango mealybug Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green), fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, eggplant mealybug Coccidohystrix insolita (Green), passionvine mealybug Planococcus minor (Maskell), longtailed mealybug Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), green shield scale Pulvinaria psidii (Maskell), wax scale Drepanococcus chiton (Green), cottony citrus scale Pulvinaria polygonata (Cockerell), hemispherical scale Saissetia coffeae (Walker), Fistulococcus pokfulamensis (Hodgson and Martin) (Hemiptera: Coccidae) and Uhleria araucariae (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) [15,133]. An exotic parasitoid T. remus, introduced for control of S. litura and A. janata in 1963 [17], has proven to be one of the effective agents for controlling fall armyworm S. frugiperda that invaded India in 2018 [90]. Exotic parasitoids introduced, T. evanescens for stem borers, and T. brasiliensis and T. pretiosum for Helicoverpa sp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) have been reported to parasitize diamondback moth P. xylostella in India [28,33].

2.4.1. Successes

Until 2004, a total of 166 exotic natural enemies of insect pests and weeds were imported and studied in India. Out of these, 71 species established in the field resulting in six, excellent; seven, substantial; and four, partial control of invasive insect pests and weeds [15]. By 2018, a total of 22 species of natural enemies of weeds established in the field, of which, seven, four, and nine agents provided excellent, substantial, and partial control, respectively [134]. Since 2004, eight exotic natural enemies were imported, of which six established in the field, one did not establish, and one has yet to be released in the field. We found either intentionally or fortuitously introduced natural enemies provided fifteen, excellent; nine, substantial; and four, partial control of invasive insect pests and weeds (Table 2).

2.4.2. Constraints

Biotic constraints such as local hyper parasitoids attacking introduced parasitoids; and parasitoids attacking predators of invasive insect pests and introduced natural enemies of invasive weeds have reduced efficacy of the introduced natural enemies. The parasitoid, A. arizonensis of cotton mealybug P. solenopsis is attacked by hyper parasitoids Promuscidea unfasciativentris (Girault), Myiocnema comperei (Ashmead), Prochiloneurus albifuniculus (Hayat, Alam and Agarwal), Prochiloneurus pulchellus (Silvestri), Prochiloneurus aegyptiacus (Mercet) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Marietta leopardina (Motschulsky) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) [64]. Lantana camara natural enemies, O. lantanae is attacked by eight species of chalcidoid parasitoids ([135] and T. scrupulosa by an egg parasitoid, Erythmelus teleonemiae (Subba Rao) (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) [136]. Four parasitoids, Diameromicrus kiesenwetteri (Meyr) (Hymenoptera: Torymidae), Syntomopus sp. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), Bracon sp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and Eurytoma sp. (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) identified on P. utilis impacted its efficacy on control of Crofton weed A. adenophora [104]. The parasitoid, Ormyrus orientalis Walker (Hymenoptera: Ormyridae) has been observed to attack C. connexa, the natural enemy of Siam weed C. odorata in Bengaluru [112]. Parasitoids Aprostocetus sp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Homalotylus turkmenicus (Myartseva), H. flaminus Dalman (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and Metastenus concinnus (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) attack immature stages of the ladybeetle Hyperaspis maindroni (Sicard) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Tetrastichus sp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Brachycyrtus sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) parasitize larvae of Mallada desjardinsi (Navas) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) [69]. The parasitoid Palexorista sp. (Diptera: Tachinidae) and predators, Andrallus spinidens (F), Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and Sycanus pyrrhomelas (Walker) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), were reducing the population of the leaf feeding beetle C. bicolorata introduced for control of parthenium [137].

2.4.3. Gaps

There are gaps in implementing classical biological control of introduced insect pests and weeds. For example, invasive insects I. insignis and Q. erythrinae were effectively controlled by introduced natural enemies in other countries [35,36,70] and India could consider introducing them. Similarly, effective natural enemies used to control invasive weeds M. diplotricha and P. stratioides in other countries could be considered for introduction [124,130]. Efforts made to manage M. micrantha by introducing the rust fungus should be followed up [127]. Some agents introduced for control of invasive weeds are yet to be distributed widely in India. For example, Octotoma scabripennis was established in northern India in 1971 but has not yet been introduced to southern India. Furthermore, C. connexa, established in the Bengaluru area in 2002, has not been released in northeastern India, where C. odorata is a serious problem. While addressing biological control of invasive insect pests has been streamlined, the same for invasive weeds requires strengthening.

2.4.4. Impact Assessment

Only a few reports are available on assessing economic impact of controlling invasive insect pests and weeds by introduced exotic natural enemies in India. Myrick et. al. [138] estimated that India benefited from USD 540 million to USD 1.34 billion by introducing the parasitoid A. papayae for control of papaya mealybug P. marginatus. According to Selvaraj et. al. [139] adoption of biological control strategies for management of rugose spiralling whitefly on coconut and oil palm plantations resulting in a saving of Indian Rs 9500/ha. Ballal [16] reported release of C. salviniae for control of S. molesta resulting in savings (on labor alone) of Indian Rs 6.9 million annually. Impact assessment is essential to understand the benefits of the projects as well as to gain support of donors and policy makers.

2.5. Augmentative Biological Control

Trichogrammatids are the most used agents in inundated augmentative biological control. According to Jalali [33], there are 19 introduced exotic species and 32 locally identified species of Trichogramma in India of which, T. chilonis, T. japonicum, T. achaeae, T. embryophagum, T. pretiosum, T. brasiliensis, and T. bactrae are commonly used in augmentative control, mostly for the lepidopteran pests. To cite a few examples, Krishnamoorthy et al. [140] recommended release of either one of the local parasitoids T. bactrae, T. chilonis or the exotic parasitoid T. brassicae at the rate of 50,000 adults per hectare per week for the effective control of P. xylostella. Singh [28] recommended release of T. embryophagum at 2000 adults/tree at weekly intervals, starting when the first moth is caught in the pheromone trap for codling moth L. pomonella management. Additionally, Singh [28] has given a list for augmentative releases of T. brasiliensis, T. chilonis, T. pretiosum, A. mali, L. dactylopii, N. cardinalis, C. montrouzieri, and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and their dosages for control of various vegetable and fruit crop insect and mite pests in India. However, India lags far behind European countries in commercial production and utilization of natural enemies for augmentative control especially in macrobials.

2.6. Conservation Biological Control

Conservation biological control plays a major role in successes of classical and augmentative biological control by enhancing the efficacy of natural enemies. Indiscriminate pesticide use is a major negative factor in conservation biological control [141]; however, pesticide use in India is low at 0.4 kg/ha compared to 1.83 kg/ha in China. Additionally, pesticide use has declined from 0.44 kg/ha in 1990 to 0.37 kg/ha by 2021 [142] due to implementation of integrated pest management (IPM). There are 36 Central Integrated Pest Management Centers (CIPMC) located in 28 states and two union territories are promoting the use of biopesticides and natural enemies and emphasizing conservation biological control. It is a positive and encouraging development, which strengthens conservation biological control and enhances environmental safety in India.
There are several instances of successful conservation biological control due to creation of safer environment for natural enemies. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri introduced for management of C. viridis provided control of several mealybugs and scale insects [15]. Native and naturalized natural enemies successfully managed South American tomato leaf miner, P. absoluta, banana skipper E. torus, American serpentine leafminer L. trifolii, Jack Beardsley mealybug P. jackbeardsleyi, Madeira mealybug P. madeirensis, fall armyworm S. frugiperda, and some of the recently introduced whiteflies.

3. Way Forward

Even though varying degrees of success in managing invasive insect pests and weeds has been achieved by adopting biological control, it would be worthwhile to explore natural enemies of some of the exotic pests of economic and environmental importance, such as mango fruit borer Citripestis eutraphera (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), red banded mango caterpillar Deanolis sublimbalis Snellen (Crambidae: Lepidoptera), tobacco thrips T. parvispinus, western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), legume feeding whitefly Tetraleurodes acaciae (Quaintance) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Bondar’s nesting whitefly Paraleyrodes bondari Peracchi (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), apple leaf blotch miner Leucoptera malifoliella (O. Costa) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), cactus mealybug Hypogeococcus pungens (Granara de Willink) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), pit scale Hyalococcus striatus (Russell) (Hemiptera: Asterolecaniidae), mango soft scale Fistulococcus pokfulamensis (Hodgson and Martin) (Hemiptera: Coccidae), and others that have already established in India. When no effective natural enemies are found, effective alternate IPM components should be explored and implemented.
An invasive insect pest of coconut trees and a native of Southeast Asia, the hispine beetle Brontispa longissima (Gestro) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), has established in the neighboring countries Maldives and Myanmar [143,144]. As such, India should take necessary quarantine measures to prevent its introduction and to take appropriate control measures when it invades. One of the options available is the introduction of the parasitoids Asecodes hispinarum Boucĕk and Tetrastichus brontispae (Ferrière) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) that have had successful results in several Asia–Pacific countries [144]. Giant sensitive tree, Mimosa pigra L. (Leguminosae), an invasive weed native to the neotropics, has established in Myanmar and Sri Lanka [145]. The report of its occurrence in India by Welgama et al. [146] is an error. It also requires quarantine measures to prevent introduction and appropriate control measures to be taken when it gets introduced.

4. Conclusions

The first documented biological control of a weed took place in India in 1795, leading to the initiation of biological control programs around the world. However, until the start of the Project Directorate of Biological control in 1977 (presently, ICAR–National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources), most of the activities were sporadic and lacked systematic implementation and follow up. Successful control was achieved of the weeds, O. monacantha, O. stricta, O. elatior, and S. molesta, and insect pests, A. dispersus, C. viridis, A. rugioperculatus, C. perniciosa, H. cubana, I. purchasi, L. invasa, P. marginatus, P. manihoti, and P. solenopsis, by adopting classical biological control. The coccinellid beetle, C. montrouzieri, introduced from Australia in 1898, has contributed to control of several species of mealybugs and scale insects. Partial control was achieved of L. camara, C. odorata, E. lanigerum, A. atratus, A. floccosus, and P. hysterophorus. Augmentative control was adopted using both exotic and local natural enemies for E. lanigerum, P. opercullela, P. xylostella, L. pomonella, P. absoluta, and S. frugiperda. Efficacy of some of the introduced natural enemies of weeds was reduced by the local parasitoids, predators of insect pests by parasitoids, and parasitoids by hyperparasitoids. In general, India has benefited to the tune of billions of dollars by managing invasive species and safeguarding the environment through adaptation of biological control programs. The declining trend in use of chemical pesticides in recent years is a step in the right direction for sustainable development. With the development of human resources in employing cutting-edge technologies, such as molecular tools, artificial intelligence, and machine learning, biological control of invasive species activities could be substantially improved.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects17010061/s1, Table S1. List of invasive insect pests recorded in the past 20 years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.; formal analysis, R.M. and K.S. (Kesavan Subaharan); investigation, R.M., K.S. (Kesavan Subaharan), K.S. (Krishnan Selvaraj) and M.S.; supervision, R.M. and K.S. (Kesavan Subaharan); writing original draft, R.M. and K.S. (Kesavan Subaharan); writing, review, and editing, R.M., K.S. (Kesavan Subaharan), M.S., K.S. (Krishnan Selvaraj) and S.N.S.; organizing and management, R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Center for International Research, Education, and Development at Virginia Tech and Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Bureau for Agricultural Insect Resources for the support provided to the authors. We appreciate comments and suggestions provided by the two anonymous reviewers which immensely improved the rigor of this article. Thanks to Joshua Anderson for language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ramakrishnan, P.S. Ecology of Biological Invasion in the Tropics; International Scientific Publications: New Delhi, India, 1991; 197p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bang, A.; Cuthbert, R.N.; Haubrock, P.J.; Fernandez, R.D.; Moodley, D.; Diagne, C.; Turbelin, A.J.; Renault, D.; Dalu, T.; Courchamp, F. Massive economic costs of biological invasions despite widespread knowledge gaps: A dual setback for India. Biol. Invasions 2022, 24, 2017–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Muniappan, R.; Reddy, G.V.P.; Raman, A. Biological Control of Tropical Weeds Using Arthropods; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; 495p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sushil, S.N.; Sampathkumar, M.; Shylesha, A.N.; Subaharan, K. Invasive Insect Pest Threats to Indian Agriculture: Present status, Challenges and Way Forward. Indian. J. Plant Prot. 2024, 52, 73–90. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ehler, L.E. Conservation biological control: Past, present, and future. In Conservation Biological Control; Barbosa, P., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferro, D.N.; McNeil, J.N. Habitat enhancement and conservation of natural enemies of insects. In Conservation Biological Control; Barbosa, P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998; pp. 123–132. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zimmermann, H.; Moran, C.; Hoffmann, J. Invasive cactus species (Cactaceae). In Biological Control of Tropical Weeds Using Arthropods; Muniappan, R., Reddy, G.V.P., Raman, A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 108–129. [Google Scholar]
  8. Goeden, R.D. A capsule history of biological control of weeds. Biocontrol News Info. 1988, 9, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ramachandra Rao, Y. Lantana insects in India. Mem. Dep. Agric. India Entomol. Ser. 1920, 5, 239–314. [Google Scholar]
  10. Subramanyam, T.V. The Lantana seed fly in India, Agromyza (Ophiomyia) lantanae Froggatt. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 1934, 4, 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kunhikannan, K. The introduction of a new insect into Mysore (India). Agric. J. 1928, 8, 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  12. Muniappan, R. Opportunities and constraints for classical weed biocontrol in developing countries. In Proceedings of the XV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Engelberg, Switzerland, 26–31 August 2018; pp. 59–61. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20203127165 (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  13. Sushilkumar; Anokhe, A.; Singh, N.; Deeksha, M.G. Climate change effect on the efficacy of biological control agents of terrestrial and aquatic invasive weeds. Indian J. Weed Sci. 2024, 56, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mayne, W.W. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant in South India. Nature 1953, 172, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, S.P. Some Success Stories in Classical Biological Control of Agricultural Pests in India; Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok, Thailand, 2004; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ballal, C. Success stories in biological control: Lessons learnt. Vantage: J. Themat. Anal. 2022, 3, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rao, V.P.; Ghani, M.A.; Sankaran, T.; Mathur, K.C. A Review of the Biological Control of Insects and Other Pests in South-East Asia and the Pacific Region; Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Technical Communication No. 6; Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: England, UK, 1971; p. 149. [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh, S.P. Achievements of AICRP on Biological Control; Technical Bulletin No. 2; Biological Control Centre, National Centre for Integrated Pest Management: Faridabad, India, 1989; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mathew, I.L.; Singh, D. Biological control: The origins and the Indian scenario. Intern. J. Entomol. Res. 2022, 7, 98–101. [Google Scholar]
  20. Asante, S.K. Natural enemies of the woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): A review of the world literature. Plant Prot. Quart. 1997, 12, 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasool, I.; Lone, G.M.; Wani, A.R.; Pathania, S.S.; Sharma, M.K.; Khan, N.A.; Nazir, N.; Hussain, S. Natural Enemies fauna associated with woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum Hausmann in Kashmir. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2019, 7, 798–803. [Google Scholar]
  22. Singh, S.; Sharma, J.H.; Udikeri, A.; Ansari, H. Invasive insects in India. In Invasive Species—Introduction Pathways, Economic Impacts, and Possible Management Options; El-Shafie, H.A.F., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  23. Puttarudriah, M.; Channabasavanna, G.P.; Krishna Murti, B. Discovery of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (coccinellidae, Coleoptera, Insecta) in Bangalore, South India. Nature 1952, 169, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Srinivasa, M.V. New parasites and host plants of coffee green scale (Coccus viridis (Green)) Homoptera: Coccidae in south India. J. Coffee Res. 1987, 17, 122–123. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lefroy, H.M. The potato tuber moth. Indian Agric. J. 1907, 2, 294–295. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chandel, R.S.; Vashisth, S.; Soni, S.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, V. The Potato Tuber Moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) in India: Biology, Ecology, and Control. Potato Res. 2020, 63, 15–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sankaran, T. Natural enemies introduced in recent years for biological control of agricultural pests in India. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 1974, 44, 425–433. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh, S.P. Fifteen Years of AICRP on Biological Control; Project Directorate of Biological Control: Bangalore, India, 1994; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nagarkatti, S.; Singh, S.P. Importation and establishment of new natural enemies of Heliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) into India. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Biological Control of Heliothis: Increasing the Effectiveness of Natural Enemies, New Delhi, India, 11–15 November 1985; Far Eastern Regional Research Office, U.S. Department of Agriculture: New Delhi, India, 1989; pp. 375–385. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fotidar, M.R. The San Jose scale and its control in Kashmir. Indian Farming 1941, 2, 234–237. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gupta, R.P. Biological control of San Jose scale in India—An overview. Acta Hortic. 2005, 696, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fletcher, T.B. Some South Indian Insects and Other Animals of Importance Considered Especially from an Economic Point of View; Superintendent Government Press: Madras, India, 1914; 565p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jalali, S.K. Natural occurrence, host range and distribution of trichogrammatid egg parasitoids. In Biological Control of Insect Pests Using Egg Parasitoids; Sithanantham, S., Ballal, C.R., Jalali, S.K., Bakthavatsalam, N., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  34. Booth, R.G.; Cross, A.E.; Flower, S.V.; Shaw, R.H. The biology and taxonomy of Hyperaspis pantherina (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and the classical biological control of its prey, Orthezia insignis (Homoptera: Ortheziidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1995, 85, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fowler, S.V. Biological control of an exotic scale, Orthezia insignis Browne (Homoptera: Ortheziidae), saves the endemic gumwood tree, Commidendrum robustrum (Roxb.) DC. (Asteraceae) on the island of St. Helena. Biol. Control 2004, 29, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ramachandra Rao, Y.; Cherian, M.C. The fluted scale, Icerya purchasi Mask., as a pest of wattle in south India, and its control by biological method. Madras Agric. J. 1944, 31, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patel, N.M.; Patel, N.B.; Raghunandan, B.L. Report of Novius fumidus Mulsant (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera); A potential predator of Egyptian cottony cushion Scale (Icerya aegyptiaca Douglas) infesting Casuarina equisetifolia in Gujarat, India. Biol. Forum-Intern. J. 2022, 14, 190–192. [Google Scholar]
  38. Malik, R.A.; Punjabi, A.A.; Bhat, A.A. Survey study of insect and non-insect pests in Kashmir. Horticulture 1972, 3, 29–44. [Google Scholar]
  39. Opinion and Editorial. Scourge of Codling Moth in Ladakh and Its Management. Greater Kashmir. 8 June 2018. Available online: https://www.greaterkashmir.com/opinion/scourge-of-codling-moth-in-ladakh-and-its-management/ (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  40. Kaushik, H.D.; Arora, R.K. Trichogramma: Research and use in India. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Trichogramma and Other Egg Parasitoids, Cali, Colombia, 4–7 March 1998; Hassan, S.A., Ed.; Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Darmstadt, Germany, 1998; pp. 155–176. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bindra, O.S.; Bakhetia, D.R.C. The chemical control of the peach stem aphid, Pterochlorus persicae (Cholodkovsky). J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 1970, 7, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mahendiran, G.; Akbar, S.A.; Dar, M.A. The invasive aphid Pterochloroides persicae (Cholodkovsky, 1899) (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea: Lachninae) recorded on important fruit trees in Kashmir valley, India. J. Threat. Taxa 2018, 10, 11672–11678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mani, M.; Thontadarya, T.S. Record of mealybug species on grapevine in Karnataka. Curr. Sci. 1987, 56, 1192. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gopalan, M.; Jayaraj, S.; Ariavanam, M.; Pillai, K.; Subba Rao, P.V. New record of Heteropsylla cubana Crawford (Psyllidae: Homoptera) on soobabul Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit in India. Curr. Sci. 1988, 57, 1124–1125. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jalali, S.K.; Singh, S.P. Release and recovery of an exotic coccinellid predator, Curinus coeruleus (Muls.) on subabul psyllid, Heteropsylla cubana Crawf. in India. J. Insect Sci. 1989, 2, 158–159. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rajagopal, D.; Naik, S.; Munegowda, M.K. Subabul psyllid and its outbreak in Karnataka. Curr. Res. 1990, 19, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  47. Viraktamath, C.A.; Tiwari, G.C.; Srinivasan, K.; Gupta, M. American serpentine leaf miner is new threat to crops. Indian Farming 1993, 43, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  48. Viraktamath, C.A. Alien invasive insect and mite pests and weeds in India and their management. Micrones. Suppl. 2002, 6, 67–83. [Google Scholar]
  49. Durairaj, C. Bio-Ecology and IPM for Serpentine Leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii Burgess with Special Reference to Cowpea and Tomato; ICAR Ad Hoc Scheme Completion Report, Centre for Plant Protection Studies; Tamil Nadu Agricultural University: Coimbatore, India, 2007; 110p. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kumar, P.K.V.; Prakasan, C.B.; Vijayalakshmi, C.K. Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): First record from India. J. Coffee Res. 1990, 3, 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  51. Central Coffee Research Institute. Integrated Management of Coffee Berry Borer; Feriva, S.A., Ed.; Central Coffee Research Institute: Cali, Colombia, 2002; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
  52. David, B.V.; Regu, K. Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera) a whitefly pest, new to India. Pestology 1995, 19, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mani, M.; Krishnamoorthy, A. Classical biological control of the spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell—An appraisal. Insect Sci. Applic. 2002, 22, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yousuf, M.; Singh, S.; Ikram, M.; Singh, R.B. An overview on outbreak of Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Northern India. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2017, 5, 496–501. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ramanagouda, S.H.; Vastrad, A.S.; Narendran, T.C.; Basavngoud, K.; Virktamath, S. Current status of eucalyptus gall wasp and its native parasitoids in Karnataka. J. Biol. Control 2011, 25, 193–197. [Google Scholar]
  56. Shylesha, A.N. Final Project Report: Classical Biological Control of Eucatyptus Gall Wasp Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle; National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects: Bangalore, India, 2008; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shylesha, A.N.; Kumar, P.S.; Sreedevi, K.; Ballal, C.R. Biocontrol Rescues the Paper Industry: Management of Eucalyptus Gall Wasp, Leptocybe invasa; ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources: Bengaluru, India, 2018; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  58. Basu, A.N.; Banerjee, S.N. Aphids of economic plants of West Bengal. Indian Agric. 1958, 2, 89–112. [Google Scholar]
  59. Baitha, A.; Triparthi, G.M.; Singh, M.R.; Roy, S. Status of invasive woolly aphid management on sugarcane in India. Hexapoda 2019, 28, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  60. Srikanth, J.; Singaravelu, B.; Kurup, N.K.; Mukunthan, N.; Santhalakshmi, G.; Nirmala, R. Predators as natural and applied biocontrol agents of sugarcane woolly aphid Ceratovacuna lanigera in India: An appraisal. J. Sugarcane Res. 2015, 5, 51–72. [Google Scholar]
  61. Faizal, M.H.; Prathapan, K.D.; Anith, K.N.; Mary, C.A.; Lekha, M.; Rini, C.R. Erythrina gall wasp Quadrastichus erythrinae, yet another invasive pest new to India. Curr. Sci. 2006, 90, 1061–1062. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kaufman, L.; Yalemar, J.; Wright, M.G. Classical biological control of the erythrina gall wasp, Quadrastichus erythrinae, in Hawaii: Conserving an endangered Habitat. Biol. Control 2020, 142, 104161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Suresh, S.; Kavitha, P.C. New records of Coccoidea in India, p. 155. In Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Scale Insect Studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 24–27 September 2007; Branco, M., Franco, J.C., Hodgson, C.J., Eds.; ISA Press: Lisbon, Portugal, 2008; p. 322. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ram, P.; Saini, R.K. Biological control of solenopsis mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on cotton: A typical example of fortuitous biological control. J. Biol. Control 2010, 24, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fand, B.B.; Suroshe, S.S. The invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, a threat to tropical and subtropical agricultural and horticultural production systems—A review. Crop Prot. 2015, 69, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Muniappan, R.; Shepard, B.M.; Watson, G.W.; Carner, G.R.; Saritami, D.; Rauf, A.; Hammig, M.D. First report of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Indonesia and India. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 2008, 25, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Poorani, J.; Anuradha, C.; Thanigairaj, R.; Prashina, M.P. Coccinellid predators of mealybugs infesting banana in South India, including a new species and a new record of Scymnus Kugelann (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), with notes on other natural enemies. Zootaxa 2024, 5419, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mani, M.; Joshi, S.; Kalyanasundaram, M.; Shivaraju, C.; Krishnamoorthy, A.; Asokan, R.; Rebijith, K.B. A new invasive Jack Beardsley mealybug, Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on papaya in India. Flor. Entomol. 2013, 96, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mani, M.; Shylesha, A.N. Invasive mealybugs and their management in India: Past, present and future. Hexapoda 2021, 28, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shylesha, A.N.; Joshi, S. Occurrence of Madeira mealybug, Phenacoccus madeirensis Green (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India and record of associated parasitoids. J. Biol. Control 2012, 26, 272–273. [Google Scholar]
  71. Nandudkar, S.V.; Santhakumar, M.V.; Chavan, S.S.; Jadhav, A.D. Biology of Nephus regularis (Sicard) on the invasive mealybug, Phenacoccus madeirensis (Green) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Res. Perspect. Biol. Sci. 2025, 2, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lepakshi, N.M. Studies on the Bio-Ecology of Mealybug, Phenacoccus madeirensis Green (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) with Special Reference to Cotton. Master’s Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India, 2015; p. 51. [Google Scholar]
  73. Soumya, K.C.; Sajeev, T.V.; Maneetha, T.K.; Vijayan, K.; Mathew, G. Incidence of Erionota thrax (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) as a pest of banana in Kerala. Entomon 2013, 38, 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  74. Poorani, J.; Padmanaban, B.; Sharanabasappa, D.; Thanigairaj, R.; Ragesh, G. A review of the pest status and natural enemy complex of banana skipper Erionota torus Evans in South India and its management. Indian J. Entomol. 2020, 82, 479–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Abdul-Jaleel, K.; Ghosh, S.M.; Jacob, S.; Anangh, M.K. Megaselia scalaris (Loew) (Diptera: Phoridae)—A new pupal parasitoid of the invasive banana skipper Erionota torus Evans from India confirmed by COI gene barcoding. J. Adv. Zool. 2024, 45, 181–190. Available online: https://jazindia.com (accessed on 24 December 2025).
  76. Sridhar, V.; Chakravarthy, A.K.; Asokan, R.; Vinesh, L.S.; Rebijith, K.B.; Vennila, S. New record of the invasive tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in India. Pest Manag. Hort. Ecosys. 2014, 20, 148–154. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ballal, C.; Gupta, A.; Mohan, M.; Lalitha, Y.; Verghese, A. The new invasive pest Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in India and its natural enemies along with elevation of trichogrammatids for its biological control. Curr. Sci. 2016, 110, 2155–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dubey, A.K.; Sundararaj, R. A new combination and first record of the genus Aleurothrixus Quaintance and Baker (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from India. Biosystmatica 2015, 9, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  79. Yadav, G.A.K.; Vasundhara, J.; Sumalatha, B.V.; Rameskumar, A.; Selvaraj, K. Occurrence of exotic parasitoid Encarsia cubensis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) on neotropical woolly whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus and solanum whitefly Aleurotrachelus trachoides in India. Phytoparasitica 2025, 53, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tyagi, K.; Kumar, V.; Singha, D.; Chakraborty, R. Morphological and DNA barcoding evidence for invasive pest thrips, Thrips parvispinus (Thripidae: Thysanoptera), newly recorded from India. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Thorat, S.S.; Sisodiya, D.B.; Gangwar, R.K. Invasive thrips, Thrips parvispinus (Karny) an invasive threat: A review. Environ. Ecol. 2022, 30, 2170–2175. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sundararaj, R.; Selvaraj, K. Invasion of rugose spiraling whitefly, Aleurodicus rugiosperculatus Martin (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) a potential threat to coconut in India. Phytoparasitica 2017, 45, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Selvaraj, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Venkatesan, T.; Ballal, C.R.; Jalali, S.K.; Gupta, A.; Mrudula, H.K. Potential natural enemies of the invasive rugose spiraling whitefly, Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin in India. J. Biol. Control 2016, 31, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Poorani, J.; Thanigairaj, R. First report of Encarsia dispersa Polaszek (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) as a parasitoid of rugose spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a recent invasive pest in India, with notes on its predators. J. Biol. Control 2017, 31, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Josephrajkumar, A.; Mohan, C.; Babu, M.; Krishna, A.; Krishnakumar, V.; Hegde, V.; Chowdappa, P. First record of the invasive Bondar’s nesting whitefly, Paraleyrodes bondari Peracchi on coconut from India. Phytoparasitica 2019, 47, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sadhana, V.; Senguttuvan, K.; Murugan, M.; Suriya, S. Review on exotic Bondar’s nesting whitefly, Paraleyrodes bondari Peracchi infestation on multiple cropping system. Phytoparasitica 2023, 51, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sadhana, V.; Senguttuvan, K.; Murugan, M. Taxonomy of whiteflies’ natural enemies in Tamil Nadu cotton ecosystem. J. Curr. Crop Sci. Technol. 2022, 109, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  88. Shylesha, A.N.; Jalali, S.K.; Gupta, A.; Varshney, R.; Venkatesan, T.; Shetty, P.; Ojha, R.; Ganiger, P.C.; Navik, O.; Subaharan, K.; et al. Studies on new invasive pest Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its natural enemies. J. Biol. Control 2018, 32, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hokkanen, H.; Pimentel, D. New approach for selecting biological control agents. Can. Entomol. 1984, 116, 1109–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Muniappan, R.; Sah, L.P.; Nyaupane, S.; Bhandari, G.; Tiwari, S.; Bajracharya, A.S.R.; Gupta, A.; Subaharan, K. Insect parasitoids of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Africa and Asia and their adoption in integrated pest management of maize in Nepal. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2024, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Selvaraj, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Sumalatha, B.V. Invasion of the palm infesting whitefly, Aleurotrachelus atratus Hempel (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in the Oriental region. Phytoparasitica 2019, 47, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Selvaraj, J.; Rameshkumar, A.; Sumalatha, B.V.; Swathi, H.D.; Sardar, S.; Kazmi, S.I. First report of Encarsia cubensis Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) an exotic parasitoid on the neotropical whitefly Aleurotrachelus atratus Hempel (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in India. Phytoparasitica 2023, 51, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sundararaj, R.; Selvaraj, K.; Kalleshwaraswamy, C.M.; Ranjith, M.; Sumalatha, B.V. First record of the invasive woolly whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) from India. Indian J. Entomol. 2020, 82, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Selvaraj, K.; Sumalatha, B.V. Distribution, biology and population dynamics of Aleurothrixus floccosus on guava. Indian J. Plant Prot. 2021, 49, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
  95. Joshi, S.; Pai, S.G.; Deepthy, K.B.; Ballal, C.R.; Watson, G.W. The cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Maltie-Ferrero (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Pseudococcidae) arrives in India. Zootaxa 2020, 4772, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sampathkumar, M.; Mohan, M.; Shylesha, A.N.; Joshi, S.; Venkatesan, T.; Gupta, A.; Vennila, S.; Venkatachalam, S.R.; Vijayakumar, M.; Subramanian, M.; et al. Occurrence of cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera), a new invasive pest on cassava in India and prospects for its classical biological control. Curr. Sci. 2021, 120, 432–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sampathkumar, M.; Mohan, M.; Shylesha, A.N.; Joshi, S.; Gupta, A.; Saravanan, P.A.; Venkatachalam, S.R. Mass Production and Release Technique of Anagyrus lopezi Wasp for Classical Biological Control of Invasive Cassava Mealybug in Cassava (tapioca) Plantations; ICAR-NBAIR Publication: Bengaluru, India, 2022; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  98. Gupta, A.; Sampathkumar, M.; Mohan, M.; Shylesha, A.N.; Venkatesan, T.; Shashank, P.R.; Dhanyakumar, O.; Ramkumar, P. Assessing adverse impact of the native biological control disruptors in the colonies of the recent invasive pest Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in India. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 32, e01878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mir, S.H.; Nugnes, F.; Bernardo, U. First record of the invasive walnut leaf miner Caloptilia roscipennella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Kashmir, India. J. Appl. Entomol. 2024, 148, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Selvaraj, K.; Yadav, G.A.K.; Vasundhara, J.; Sumalatha, B.V.; Sundararaj, R.; Sushil, S.N. Record of the invasive Annona whitefly Aleurotrachelus anonae (Corbett) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from India. Curr. Sci. 2025, 128, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Muniappan, R.; Viraktamath, C.A. Status of biological control of the weed, Lantana camara in India. Trop. Pest Manag. 1986, 32, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sharma, K.C.; Chhetri, G.K.K. Reports on studies on the biological control of Eupatorium adenophorum. Nepal. J. Agric. 1977, 12, 135–157. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wan, T.; Wang, R. Achivements of biological weed control in the world and its prospects in China. Chin. J. Biol. Control 1991, 7, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
  104. Swaminathan, S.; Raman, A. On the morphology of the stem-galls of Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng. (Compositae) and the natural enemies of the cecidozoan, Procecidochares utilis Stone (Tephritidae, Diptera). Curr. Sci. 1981, 50, 294–295. [Google Scholar]
  105. Giriraj, C.N.; Bhat, K.V. Supply of Natural Enemies of the “Siam Weed” Eupatorium odoratum (for Nigeria and Malaysia); Annual Report; Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control: Kampala, Uganda, 1970; 112p. [Google Scholar]
  106. Chacko, M.J.; Narasimham, A.U. Biocontrol attempts against Chromolaena odorata in India—A review. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Biological Control of Chromolaena odorata, Bangkok, Thailand, 29 February–4 March 1988; pp. 65–74. [Google Scholar]
  107. Arjun, C.P.; Sarojkumar, V.; Sooraj, V.R.; Jaisankar, R.; Joseph, A. Reoccurrence of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros (Arctiidae: Lepidoptera) population in Thiruvananthapuram district of Kerala, India: A biological control agent of the weed, Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae). J. Biol. Control 2016, 30, 195–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Balaji, R.K.; Chitra, N.; Daniel, A.J.; Muthukumar, M.; Divya, R. Occurrence of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros, 1956 (Arctiinae: Erebidae: Lepidoptera) in Pulney hills, Tamil Nadu. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci. 2019, 27, 306–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Muniappan, R.; Bamba, J. Biological control of Chromolaena odorata: Successes and failures. In Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Bozeman, MT, USA, 4–14 July 1999; Spencer, N.R., Ed.; Montana State University: Bozeman, MT, USA, 2000; pp. 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  110. Bhumannavar, B.S.; Ramani, S.; Rejeshwari, S.K. Field release and impact of Cecidochares connexa (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and Robinson. J. Biol. Control 2007, 21, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  111. Sushilkumar. History, progress and prospects of classical biological control in India. Indian J. Weed Sci. 2015, 47, 306–320. [Google Scholar]
  112. NBAIR. Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros; ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, India, 2013; 1p. Available online: https://databases.nbair.res.in/Featured_insects/Pareuchaetes-pseudoinsulata.php (accessed on 24 December 2025).
  113. Jayanth, K.P. Introduction and establishment of Zygogramma bicolorata on Parthenium hysterophorus at Bangalore, India. Curr. Sci. 1987, 56, 310–311. [Google Scholar]
  114. SreeramaKumar, P. The exotic rust fungus Puccinia abrupta var. partheniicola on the invasive alien weed Parthenium hysterophorus in India: Rediscovery and first report of an epiphytotic. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2024, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shah, N.C. Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae): An exotic aquatic menace in India and its possible uses. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 2018, 42, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  116. Jayanth, K.P.; Visalakshy, P.N.K. Establishment of the exotic mite Orthogalumna terebrantis Wallwork on Water hyacinth in Bangalore, India. J. Biol. Control 1989, 3, 75–76. [Google Scholar]
  117. Waterhouse, D.F.; Norris, K.R. Biological Control Pacific Prospects; Inkata Press: Melbourne, Australia, 1987; 454p. [Google Scholar]
  118. Joy, P.J. Ecology and Control of Salvinia (African Payal) the Molesting Weed of Kerala; Technical bulletin No. 2; Kerala Agricultural University: Thrissur, India, 1978; p. 40. [Google Scholar]
  119. Joy, P.J.; Varghese, K.C.; Abraham, C.C. Studies on biology and host range of Paulinia acuminata de Geer (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and its efficiency for the control of Salvinia molesta Mitchell an aquatic floating weed in Kerala. In Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bangalore, India, 22–29 November 1981; pp. 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  120. ICAR (Indian Council of Agricultural Research). Biological Control of Alien Invasive Weed Salvinia molesta in Central India. 2022. Available online: https://www.icar.org.in/en/node/5865 (accessed on 27 July 2025).
  121. ICAR (Indian Council of Agricultural Research). Biological Control of Salvinia molesta in Satpura Water Reservoir at Sarni, Madhya Pradesh. 2024. Available online: https://www.global-agriculture.com/india-region/biological-control-of-salvinia-molesta-in-satpura-water-reservoir-at-sarni-madhya-pradesh/ (accessed on 27 July 2025).
  122. Pinjarkar, V. 6 Weed-Infested Lakes in Chanda, G’Chiroli on Verge of Revival. Times of India/April 15, 2023. Available online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/6-weed-infested-lakes-in-chanda-gchiroli-on-verge-of-revival/articleshow/99506759.cms (accessed on 27 July 2025).
  123. Napompeth, B. Biological control research and development in Thailand. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Plant Protection in the Tropics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1–4 March 1982; pp. 301–323. [Google Scholar]
  124. Waterhouse, D.F. Biological Control of Weeds: Southeast Asian Prospects; Monograph; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra, Australia, 1994; Volume 26, 302p. [Google Scholar]
  125. Jayaraj, N. Biocontrol Agents as a Solution for Invasive Species; Mongabay: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2025; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  126. Ellison, C.; Day, M. Current status of release of Puccinia spegazzinii for Mikania micrantha control. Biocontrol News Info 2010, 32, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  127. Sankaran, K.V.; Ellison, C.A.; Suresh, T.A. Biological control of Mikania micrantha in India: Opportunities and constraints. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Biology, Control and Manage. Chromolaena odorata and other Eupatorieae, Nairobi, Kenya, 1–2 November 2010; Zachariades, C., Strathie, L.W., Day, M.D., Muniappan, R., Eds.; ARC-PPRI: Pretoria, South Africa, 2013; p. 158. [Google Scholar]
  128. Muniappan, R.; Viraktamath, C.A. Invasive alien weeds in the Western Ghats. Curr. Sci. 1993, 64, 555–558. [Google Scholar]
  129. Priyadarshini, S.; Sahu, S.A. New note on the distribution of Mimosa diplotricha C. Wright (Fabaceae) in Eastern India. Vegetos 2025, 38, 1591–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kuniata, L.S. Mimosa diplotricha C. Wright ex Sauvalle (Mimosaceae). In Biological Control of Tropical Weeds Using Arthropods; Muniappan, R., Reddy, G.V.P., Raman, A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kumar, S. Biological control of parthenium in India: Status and prospects. Indian J. Weed Sci. 2009, 41, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  132. Selvaraj, K.; Gupta, A.; Venkatesan, T.; Jalali, S.K.; Sundararaj, R.; Ballal, C.R. First record of invasive rugose spiraling whitefly Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) along with parasitoids in Karnataka. J. Biol. Control 2017, 31, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sampathkumar, M.; Mohan, M.; Joshi, S.; Shylesh, A.N.; Varshney, R.; Sushil, S.N. Managing the Invasive Mango Soft Scale in India—Cryptolaemus Swings into Action. ICAR-NBAIR Video Documentary. 2024. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Gbhhr-UDo (accessed on 24 December 2025).
  134. Kumar, S.; Ray, P. Weed biological control research in India: Progress and prospects. In Fifty Years of Weed Research in India; Kumar, S., Misra, J.S., Eds.; Indian Society of Weed Science: Jabalpur, India, 2018; pp. 331–349. [Google Scholar]
  135. Beeson, C.F.C.; Chatterjee, N.C. Possibilities of control of lantana (Lantana aculeata Linn.) by indigenous insect pests. Indian For. Rec. 1940, 3, 50–84. [Google Scholar]
  136. Jayanth, K.P.; Visalakshy, P.N.G. Suppression of the lantana bug, Teleonemea scrupulosa by Erythmelus teleonemiae in Bangaluru, India. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 1992, 40, 164. [Google Scholar]
  137. NBAIR. Zygogramma bicolorata Pallister; ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources: Bengaluru, India, 2013; 1p, Available online: https://databases.nbair.res.in/Featured_insects/Zygogramma-bicolorata.php (accessed on 24 December 2025).
  138. Myrick, S.; Norton, G.W.; Selvaraj, K.N.; Natarajan, K.; Muniappan, R. Economic impact of classical biological control of papaya mealybug in India. Crop Prot. 2014, 56, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Selvaraj, K.; Sumalatha, B.V.; Venkatesan, T.; Shylesha, A.N.; Kandan, A.; Chalapathi Rao, N.B.V.; Visalakshi, M.; Sushil, S.N. Biological Control of Invasive Rugose Spiraling Whitefly Aleurodicus rugioperculatus on Coconut and Oil Palm; Technical Bulletin No. 02/2021; ICAR-NBAIR: Bengaluru, India, 2024; p. 44. [Google Scholar]
  140. Krishnamoorthy, A.; Mani, M.; Visalakshy, P.N.G. Egg parsitoids in vegetable crops ecosystem: Research status and scope for utilization. In Biological Control of Insect Pests Using Egg Parasitoids; Sithanantham, S., Ballal, C.R., Jalali, S.K., Bakthavatsalam, N., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 397–422. [Google Scholar]
  141. Gurr, G.; Wratten, S. Biological Control: Measures of Success; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; p. 429. [Google Scholar]
  142. Reddy, A.A.; Reddy, M.; Mathur, V. Pesticide use, regulation and policies in Indian agriculture. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Shafia, A. Integrated control of coconut hispid beetle Brontispa longissimia (Gestro) in the Maldives. In Proceedings of the Report of the Expert Consultation on Coconut Beetle Outbreak in APPPC Member Countries, Bangkok, RAP Publication, Bangkok, Thailand, 26–27 October 2004; pp. 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  144. Rethinam, P.; Singh, S.P. Current Status of the Coconut Beetle Outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific Region. Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/ag117e/AG117E04.htm (accessed on 29 October 2025).
  145. Marambe, B.; Amarasinghe, L.; Silva, K.; Gamage, G.; Dissanayake, S.; Seneviratne, A. Distribution, biology and management of Mimosa pigra in Sri Lanka. In Research andmanagement of Mimosa pigra; CSIRO Entomology: Canberra, Australia, 2014; pp. 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  146. Welgama, A.; Florentine, S.; Roberts, J. A global review of the woody invasive alien species Mimosa pigra (giant sensitive plant): Its biology and management implications. Plants 2022, 11, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Intentionally and fortuitously introduced and local natural enemies attacking various invasive insect pests and weeds.
Table 1. Intentionally and fortuitously introduced and local natural enemies attacking various invasive insect pests and weeds.
Invasive Insect Pests and WeedsCountry/Region of OriginYear of Introduction to IndiaYear of First Natural Enemy IntroducedNo. of Exotic Natural Enemies Introduced and EstablishedNo. of Fortuitously Introduced Natural EnemiesLocal Natural Enemies or Ones Introduced for Other Pests
Eriosoma lanigerumChina188919301 11
Coccus viridisBrazil1890s18981 8
Comstockaspis perniciousaChina191019604 7
Phthorimaea operculellaSouth America via Italy1906194417 1
Plutella xylostellaEurope/South Africa19141994333
Icerya purchasiAustralia192819291 2
Laspeyresia pomonellaEurope and Northwestern Asia197219931 3
Paracoccus marginatusMexico200720103 7
Heteropsylla cubanaCentral America198819881 2
Hypothenemus hampeiWest Africa199019953
Quadrastichus erythrinaeAfrica 2005 1
Phenacoccus solenopsisUSA20062009 119
Leptocybe invasaAustralia 200120081 3
Phthorimaea absolutaSouth America2014 7
Liriomyza trifoliiFlorida, USA199019971 (did not establish) 2
Ceratovacuna lanigeraSoutheast Asia1958—West Bengal. 2002—Maharashtra and southern India---4
Aleurodicus dispersusCentral America and the Caribbean region1994--213
Aleurodicus rugioperculatusCentral America2016--26
Aleurotrachelus trachoidesNeotropical2014--1-
Tetraleurodes acaciaeCentral America and the Caribbean2017--1-
Paraleyrodes bondariNeotropical2017---3
Spodoptera frugiperdaAmericas2018---46
Aleurotrachelus atratusBrazil2019--14
Aleurothrixus floccosusNeotropics2019--14
Aleurotrachelus anonaeNeotropics2024--21
Erionota torusNorthern India to Southern China2012 in Southern India---14
Phenacoccus manihotiSouth America202020221-12
Phenacoccus madeirensisNeotropics2012-- 17
Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyiNeotropics2012---7
Ageratina adenophoraCentral AmericaEarly 20th century19631--
Chroromolaena odorataNeotropicsEarly 1840s197221-
Lantana camaraTropical America18091921431
Opuntia monocanthaSouth America1700s17951--
Opuntia strictaNorth AmericaMid-180019261 -
Opuntia elatiorSouth America187219261--
Parthenium hysterophorusNeotropics1950s198311-
Pistia stratiotesSoutheastern United States --1
Pontederia crassipesSouth AmericaBefore 190019823--
Salvinia molestaBrazil195519822--
Table 2. Invasive species of insects and weeds suppressed by intentionally or fortuitously introduced exotic natural enemies in India.
Table 2. Invasive species of insects and weeds suppressed by intentionally or fortuitously introduced exotic natural enemies in India.
NumberExcellentSubstantialPartial
1Aleurodicus dispersus Russell
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
Aleurotrachelus trachoides (Back)
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
Ageratina adenophora (Spreng.) King and H. Rob.
(Asteraceae)
2Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell)
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R. M. King and H. Rob. (Asterales: Asteraceae)
3Coccus viridis (Green)
(Hemiptera: Coccidae)
Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann)
(Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Lantana camara L.
(Verbenaceae)
4Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock)
(Hemiptera: Diaspididae)
Parthenium hysterophorus L.
(Asteraceae)
Pontederia crassipes Mart.
(Pontederiaceae)
5Heteropsylla cubana (Crawford)
(Hemiptera: Psyllidae)
Phenacoccus madeirensis (Green)
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
6Icerya purchasi Maskell
(Hemiptera: Monophlebidae)
Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller)
(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)
7Leptocybe invasa (Fisher and La Salle) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus)
(Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)
8Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara de Willink)
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (Gimpel and Miller)
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
9Planococcus citri (Risso)
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
10Phenacoccus manihoti (Matile-Ferrero) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
11Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
12Opuntia elatior (Miller)
(Cactaceae)
13Opuntia monacantha (Haw.)
(Cactaceae)
14Opuntia stricta (Haw.)
(Cactaceae)
15Salvinia molesta (S.D. Mitchel)
(Salviniaceae)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muniappan, R.; Subaharan, K.; Selvaraj, K.; Sampathkumar, M.; Sushil, S.N. Role of Biological Control in Management of Invasive Exotic Arthropod Pests and Weeds in India. Insects 2026, 17, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010061

AMA Style

Muniappan R, Subaharan K, Selvaraj K, Sampathkumar M, Sushil SN. Role of Biological Control in Management of Invasive Exotic Arthropod Pests and Weeds in India. Insects. 2026; 17(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muniappan, Rangaswamy, Kesavan Subaharan, Krishnan Selvaraj, Muthusamy Sampathkumar, and Satya Nand Sushil. 2026. "Role of Biological Control in Management of Invasive Exotic Arthropod Pests and Weeds in India" Insects 17, no. 1: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010061

APA Style

Muniappan, R., Subaharan, K., Selvaraj, K., Sampathkumar, M., & Sushil, S. N. (2026). Role of Biological Control in Management of Invasive Exotic Arthropod Pests and Weeds in India. Insects, 17(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop