Leveraging Adventive and Endemic Parasitoids Against Polyphagous Agromyzid Leafminers in Australia

Simple Summary

The larvae of agromyzid leafmining flies (Diptera: Agromyzidae) feed between the epidermal layers of host plant leaves, creating characteristic feeding tunnels or ‘mines’. Three polyphagous agromyzid leafmining flies (Liriomyza huidobrensis, L. sativae, and L. trifolii) have recently arrived in Australia and threaten commercial vegetable and cut flower production. Overseas, outbreaks of these pests have been linked to the widespread use of non-selective insecticides, which disrupt biological control by parasitoid wasps that attack larvae within the leaf mines. An analysis of international records of parasitoids associated with the three Liriomyza species showed that Diglyphus isaea, Neochrysocharis formosa, and Hemiptarsenus varicornis (all already present in Australia) are the most commonly recorded worldwide. Protecting open-field production will require fostering parasitoid populations as part of integrated pest management programs. The high cost of mass-reared parasitoids will likely restrict augmentative releases to greenhouse production, but costs could be reduced if female-only strains can be identified or selected. Biological control should be a key tool for Australian growers to manage Liriomyza pests when minimizing insecticide use.

Abstract

The recent incursions of three agromyzid leafminers (Liriomyza huidobrensis, L. sativae, and L. trifolii) into Australia pose a significant threat to horticultural production. Outbreaks of these polyphagous pests are consistently associated with the disruption of their parasitoids caused by the widespread use of non-selective insecticides and to increasing pesticide resistance in these agromyzids. An analysis of the international literature for records of parasitoids associated with L. huidobrensis, L. sativae, and L. trifolii revealed that they are attacked by a similar profile of parasitoid families: Eulophidae (63% of records), Braconidae (19%), Pteromalidae (9%), and Figitidae (8%). Diglyphus isaea, Neochrysocharis formosa and Hemiptarsenus varicornis (all already recorded in Australia) were the most commonly reported parasitoids worldwide. These species, along with Australia’s broader parasitoid fauna, will play an important role in managing invasive Liriomyza species, provided insecticide use does not disrupt their populations. However, key knowledge gaps remain, especially regarding the taxonomy of local parasitoids, their potential use in conservation biocontrol programs, and the local landscape features that support parasitoid populations. The use of various species in augmentative releases is considered, including constraints and opportunities related to strain selection and the potential use of thelytokous strains for mass-rearing.

1. Introduction

The leafminers Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard), Liriomyza sativae Blanchard and Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) are recognized globally as significant pests of vegetables and ornamental flowers [1]. The global spread of these polyphagous Liriomyza species has occurred largely through international trade of flowers and vegetables [2,3,4]. Liriomyza huidobrensis and L. trifolii present greater control challenges than L. sativae due to their higher levels of resistance to insecticides [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. In the USA, L. trifolii has largely displaced L. sativae in horticultural regions [8], with a similar trend emerging in southern China [8,11,12]. Liriomyza trifolii was first recorded in Kenya in 1976 on chrysanthemum cuttings imported from Florida [3] and later found in South Africa in 1983 [13]. Infested chrysanthemum cuttings from Kenya and Malta are believed to be the source of L. trifolii for its introduction to Europe in the early 1980s [3]. However, L. huidobrensis has emerged as the predominant agromyzid across all elevations in Kenya [14] and is now recognized as the most widespread potato pest in South Africa [15,16]. In Europe, both L. huidobrensis and L. trifolii are major pests of greenhouse-grown vegetables and flowers.

In Australia, all three polyphagous Liriomyza species have now been detected. Liriomyza sativae was first recorded on the Australian mainland at Seisia, near the tip of Cape York, in 2015 [17], following its identification in the Torres Strait in 2008 [18,19]. Ten years on, it remains localized at Seisia. Liriomyza huidobrensis was first confirmed from field-grown vegetables in Sydney in October 2020, and in southern Queensland in November 2020 [20,21]. Liriomyza trifolii was first recorded in the Kununurra region in far northern Western Australia in March 2021 and on Thursday Island, Queensland in May 2021. Additional specimens have since been found in the Northern Peninsula Area of Cape York Peninsula and the Northern Territory [22]. In 2025, L. trifolii was detected for the first time in the Lockyer Valley horticultural region in SE Queensland, 2700 km southeast by road from the known initial outbreak in the Cape York Peninsula [23]. COI haplotypes have now been established for Australian populations of all three species, along with their Wolbachia infection status [24,25].

With the recent incursions of L. huidobrensis and L. trifolii in Australia, it is essential to reassess the parasitoids in Australia that could target these species, as invading Liriomyza populations are often rapidly exploited by local parasitoids [26]. An extensive literature survey [27] highlighted a substantial local endemic and adventive parasitoid community in Australia, primarily consisting of species in the Eulophidae, Pteromalidae and Braconidae, known to attack agromyzids. Surveys of Liriomyza brassicae (Riley), Liriomyza chenopodii (Watt), Phytomyza plantaginis Goreau and Phytomyza syngenesiae (Hardy) and their associated parasitoids have been conducted in eastern Australia [24,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Three cosmopolitan species, Diglyphus isaea (Walker), Hemiptarsenus varicornis (Girault) and Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood), were the most abundant, along with four Australian endemic species, Zagrammosoma latilineatum Ubaidillah, Trigonogastrella parasitica Girault, Closterocerus mirabilis Edwards & La Salle and Opius cinerariae Fischer, about which little is known regarding their biology and ecology.

This review complements the recent synthesis of parasitoids of L. sativae [27] and examines global records of parasitoid wasps reared from L. huidobrensis and L. trifolii to assess whether Australia’s existing assemblage of agromyzid parasitoids may be adequate for control of these newly invasive species. We then discuss the challenges and opportunities for augmentative and conservation biological control of Liriomyza spp. in Australia.

Any compilation of species names derived from scientific literature inherently contains some uncertainty regarding the accuracy of species identifications, and the completeness of any list will depend on the extent of scientific engagement with the issue [35,36,37].

During the 1950s and 1960s, there were widespread difficulties in correctly identifying Liriomyza spp. [38,39]. Accurate identification of their parasitoids is even more difficult, with very few taxonomists available to confirm identifications, even for species that have been formally described. Consequently, reared parasitoids are sometimes only identified to genus level, and some questionable identifications have been published—errors that can be perpetuated in subsequent parasitoid lists [36]. Additionally, there is growing evidence of cryptic species among parasitoids, as in the case of N. formosa [40,41,42] and D. isaea [43,44], which may represent unresolved species complexes. Molecular diagnosis is then required to verify records in different regions, and voucher specimens should be deposited in appropriate insect collections to be databased and available for future reference [45,46].

2. Parasitoids Reared from Liriomyza spp. Worldwide

For this review, we returned to the primary literature sources but used some previous lists as guides. Since 1987, several lists of parasitoids reared from polyphagous Liriomyza spp. have been published (

Table 1. Comprehensive lists of parasitoids recorded from polyphagous Liriomyza species worldwide.

Reference	Description
Waterhouse and Norris (1987) [47]	List of parasitoids of L. huidobrensis, L. sativae and L. trifolii. They differentiate between parasitoids identified to species or only to genus. They also provide lists of parasitoids reared from ‘Liriomyza spp.’ or ‘Liriomyza. sp.’ (implying L. sativae, L. trifolii or L. huidobrensis or mixed populations of two or three of these). Note that they include records of Liriomyza langei Frick from California and Hawaii as L. huidobrensis.
Grenouillet et al. (1993) [35]	A world list of all known parasites and predators of the 26 economically important species of Liriomyza is given. Relatively few records of parasitoids of L. huidobrensis, since the review was completed before the major expansion of L. huidobrensis worldwide. Because of space limitations, the majority of the 69 references listed were not linked by the authors to individual species.
Vega (2003) [48]	Lists of 73 parasitoid species reared from Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach), Liriomyza strigata (Meigen), L. huidobrensis and L. trifolii. No references given and nomenclature is outdated.
Liu et al. (2011) [49]	This review provides a list of 143 parasitoid species recorded from Liriomyza spp. but without references for individual species. Nomenclature is outdated for many species.
Weintraub et al. (2017) [4]	This is a very comprehensive record of parasitoids of L. huidobrensis, with host plant records for nearly all records. Primary references are cited.
Ridland et al. (2020) [27]	Seventy-one parasitoid species recorded from L. sativae worldwide (50 species of Eulophidae; 12 species of Braconidae; 5 species of Pteromalidae; 5 species of Figitidae). Primary references are cited.
UCD Community (2023) [50]	The Universal Chalcidoidea Database provides an exhaustive catalog of Chalcidoidea, with extensive references and up-to-date nomenclature. L. huidobrensis (30 species of Eulophidae; 8 species of Pteromalidae), L. sativae (39 species of Eulophidae; 4 species of Pteromalidae) and L. trifolii (45 species of Eulophidae; 6 species of Pteromalidae; 1 species of Tetracampidae).

). For L. trifolii, all data were retrieved from primary sources (Table S1). For L. huidobrensis, we used data from Weintraub et al. [4] as a foundation, with Supplementary Data added where found (Table S2). Data for L. sativae was based on Ridland et al. [27], again with Supplementary Data added where found (Table S3). Host and location records for parasitoids of each Liriomyza species were combined to prevent overestimating the importance of a particular species, especially in countries with disproportionate research effort (e.g., Japan, Turkey, and China). For example, we listed 10 records of D. isaea attacking L. trifolii in Turkey; these were combined to give a single location record of D. isaea attacking L. trifolii in Turkey. Parasitoids reared from mixed collections of Liriomyza spp. were excluded. Data collection concluded in October 2020.

The parasitoid assemblages for L. huidobrensis, L. sativae, and L. trifolii are very similar in family and sub-family composition (

Table 2. Hymenopteran parasitoids reared from L. huidobrensis (Lh), L. trifolii (Lt) and L. sativae (Ls) worldwide summarized by family and sub-family. Data for all parasitoid species are listed in Table S4.

Family/ Sub-Family		Lh		Lt		Ls		∑ 1	Pooled 2		Overlap 3
	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%
Eulophidae	49	66%	61	66%	50	69%	160	67%	92	63%	68	43%
Eulophinae	27	36%	29	32%	26	36%	82	34%	44	30%	38	46%
Entedoninae	21	28%	28	30%	24	33%	73	31%	44	30%	29	40%
Tetrastichinae	1	1%	4	4%	0	0%	5	2%	4	3%	1	20%
Braconidae	13	18%	13	14%	12	17%	38	16%	27	19%	11	29%
Opiinae	10	14%	10	11%	12	17%	32	13%	22	15%	10	31%
Alysiinae	2	3%	3	3%	0	0%	5	2%	4	3%	1	20%
Braconinae	1	1%		0%	0	0%	1	0%	1	1%	0	0%
Pteromalidae	7	9%	8	9%	5	7%	20	8%	13	9%	7	35%
Miscogastrinae	6	8%	4	4%	4	6%	14	6%	8	6%	6	43%
Pteromalinae	1	1%	4	4%	1	1%	6	3%	5	3%	1	17%
Figitidae	4	5%	9	10%	5	7%	18	8%	11	8%	7	39%
Eucoilinae	4	5%	9	10%	5	7%	18	8%	11	8%	7	39%
Tetracampidae	1	1%	1	1%	0	0%	2	1%	2	1%	0	0%
Tetracampinae	0	0%	1	1%	0	0%	1	0%	1	1%	0	0%
Platynocheilinae	1	1%	0	0%	0	0%	1	0%	1	1%	0	0%
∑	74		92		72		238		145		93

¹ Sum of all named species reared from each Liriomyza host species. ² Pooled species reared from all three Liriomyza species (Note: this total is not the sum of species from each individual Liriomyza species, as some parasitoid species occurred in more than one Liriomyza host species). ³ Overlapping species (∑-pooled), representing those reared from more than one Liriomyza host species.

). Most species (63%) belong to the family Eulophidae, with representation equally split between the Eulophinae and the Entedoninae subfamilies. The Braconidae is the next most abundant family (19%), followed by Pteromalidae (9%) and the Eucoilinae subfamily of the Figitidae (8%).

Parasitoids of agromyzids are typically considered generalists, attacking a range of agromyzid species [26,27]. The degree of overlap in parasitoid species among the three Liriomyza species for the major subfamilies ranged from 46% (Eulophinae) to 31% (Opiinae) (Table 2). About one third of parasitoid species have been recorded from all three Liriomyza host species, while a further 13% have been recorded from two species (

Table 3. Overlap of parasitoid species across agromyzid hosts. Data for all parasitoid species are listed in Table S4.

	L. huidobrensis		L. trifolii		L. sativae
Species Overlap	n	%	n	%	n	%
Lh/Lt/Ls	27	36%	27	29%	27	38%
Lh/Lt	11	15%	11	12%	NA	NA
Lh/Ls	12	16%	NA	NA	12	17%
Lt/Ls	NA	NA	16	17%	16	22%
Lh only	24	32%	NA	NA	NA	NA
Lt only	NA	NA	38	41%	NA	NA
Ls only	NA	NA	NA	NA	17	24%
∑	74		92		72

Lh = L. huidobrensis, Lt = L. trifolii, Ls = L. sativae. NA = not applicable (comparisons not applicable to a particular host species).

). Seventy-nine species have been recorded from a single host species, largely reflecting records of native parasitoids in the region of origin of a given Liriomyza species.

As the international movement of all three Liriomyza spp. is a relatively new phenomenon, endemic parasitoid species often attack the invasive agromyzids [26,51], increasing the level of species overlap. Adventive parasitoids arriving in a country with other invasive agromyzids will also enhance the level of biological control when a new agromyzid species establishes in a country. The unintentional introduction of parasitoids with their invasive hosts is becoming increasingly common due to the increasing volume of global trade [52]. For example, two Asian parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Leptopilina japonica Novković & Kimura (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) and Ganaspis kimorum Buffington (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), under evaluation for possible release in North America, have now established adventitiously in British Columbia [53]. Furthermore, L. japonica has now been recorded parasitizing D. suzukii in cherries in Italy [54], which is the first record from Europe. A similar case was observed with the plane leafminer, Phyllonorycter platani (Staudinger) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). When this insect arrived in the British Isles, it was accompanied by its specialized eulophid parasitoid, Minotetrastichus platanellus (Mercet). This species now causes a higher percentage of parasitism on P. platani than the specialist parasitoids that target native leafmining hosts [55]. However, the parasitoid communities that develop on introduced hosts are generally less diverse and tend to include more generalist species compared to those on native hosts [56]. These groups need time to establish, as native parasitoids must adapt to new host species. Early interactions may involve occasional attacks from species that are not well-suited to the invasive host, which continue only because the invader coexists with native hosts that support the parasitoid populations [56]. This suggests that many groups of parasitoids associated with newly introduced hosts, like Liriomyza species, may not have yet adapted effectively for sustained use of these hosts.

The family and sub-family composition of parasitoid assemblages summarized in Table 2 is reflected in

Table 4. Most commonly recorded parasitoid genera by location records in descending order (pooling all records for a particular location for each Liriomyza species).

Family	Sub-Family	Genus	L. huidobrensis	L. trifolii	L. sativae	∑	% 1
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Diglyphus	48	35	21	104	18%
Braconidae	Opiinae	Opius 2	31	30	17	78	16%
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Chrysocharis	30	19	18	67	11%
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Neochrysocharis	14	34	15	63	11%
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Hemiptarsenus	14	19	11	44	7%
Pteromalidae	Miscogastrinae	Halticoptera	17	12	6	35	6%
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Closterocerus	5	6	5	16	3%
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Pnigalio	6	8	1	15	3%
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Zagrammosoma	4	6	5	15	3%
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Asecodes	3	5	4	12	2%
Figitidae	Eucoilinae	Gronotoma	5	4	2	11	2%
Braconidae	Alysiinae	Dacnusa	9	2	0	11	2%
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Chrysonotomyia	2	7	1	10	2%
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Diaulinopsis	3	4	3	10	2%

¹ Percentage of all location records (588). ² Phaedrotoma has recently been synonymized with Opius [57].

. Here four genera of Eulophidae [Diglyphus (Eulophinae), Chrysocharis (Entedoninae), Neochrysocharis (Entedoninae) and Hemiptarsenus (Eulophinae)], one genus of Braconidae [Opius (Opiinae)] and one genus of Pteromalidae [Halticoptera (Miscogasterinae)] are the six most commonly recorded genera parasitizing the three Liriomyza species worldwide, together accounting for 59% of records.

The four most common parasitoid species recorded parasitizing L. huidobrensis, L. sativae and L. trifolii worldwide (

Table 5. Most commonly recorded parasitoid species of L. huidobrensis, L. trifolii and L. sativae by location records in descending order (excluding specimens only identified to genus; pooling all records for a particular location for each Liriomyza sp.). (Full data set in Table S5).

Family	Sub-Family	Species	L. huidobrensis	L. trifolii	L. sativae	∑
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Diglyphus isaea	15	12	5	32
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Neochrysocharis formosa	7	16	7	30
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Hemiptarsenus varicornis	6	11	9	26
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Chrysocharis pentheus	5	5	5	15
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Diglyphus crassinervis	5	6	2	13
Braconidae	Opiinae	Opius dissitus	4	5	3	12
Pteromalidae	Miscogastrinae	Halticoptera circulus	5	5	2	12
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Neochrysocharis okazakii	3	5	3	11
Braconidae	Opiinae	Opius dimidiatus	2	4	3	9
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Hemiptarsenus zilahisebessi	3	5	1	9
Eulophidae	Eulophinae	Diglyphus begini	4	2	3	9
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Chrysocharis caribea	2	2	4	8
Eulophidae	Entedoninae	Chrysocharis oscinidis	1	4	3	8

) are D. isaea, N. formosa, H. varicornis and Chrysocharis pentheus (Walker).

In Australia, D. isaea and N. formosa are recent adventive species recorded parasitizing Liriomyza spp. in south-eastern Australia [30,32,33]. Hemiptarsenus varicornis is a cosmopolitan species widely distributed in Australia and other parts of the world [33,58]. Chrysocharis pentheus is a common larval-pupal endoparasitoid of Liriomyza spp. in Asia [59,60,61] but has not yet been recorded in Australia. Chrysocharis pubicornis (Zetterstedt) is primarily a pupal parasitoid of agromyzids and is the only representative of the genus in Australia [58] and is not considered an important parasitoid of Liriomyza spp. [29,62]. While several Opius spp. parasitize agromyzids in Australia [63], additional research is needed to elucidate the taxonomy and biology of the opiine braconid complex that target agromyzids in the region.

The local parasitoid assemblage lacks species from the Miscogastrinae, Alysiinae and Eucoilinae taxa. The miscogastrine genus, Halticoptera, is the most common pteromalid genus attacking polyphagous Liriomyza spp. in North and South America [64]. Only two species from the Miscogastrinae are described in Australia: the cosmopolitan Ammeia pulchella Delucchi and the indigenous Rhicnocoelia incisa Boucček. Two additional Australian species, Lamprotatus damia (Walker) and Lamprotatus nicon (Walker) are considered to be incertae sedis as both type species are missing [58]. However, at least one Halticoptera sp. has been recorded in Australia and a second species in Papua New Guinea. These are likely introduced species, but no Australo-Papuan species of Halticoptera have yet been formally described [58].

The adventive alysiine, Dacnusa areolaris (Nees), which exclusively attacks Phytomyza syngenesiae, Phytomyza asteris Hendel and Phytomyza nigra Meigen [65], remains the only Dacnusa species recorded in Australia and New Zealand [66]. The endemic O. cinerariae could be evaluated as a mass-rearing alternative to Dacnusa sibirica Telenga (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) to complement D. isaea releases in protected cropping. Until recently, there were no confirmed records of eucoilines parasitizing agromyzids in Australia [27,67]. However, in 2021, an unidentified eucoiline species was reared from puparia of L. huidobrensis infesting celery crops in Queensland (PM Ridland unpublished data).

Further collections in Queensland may reveal more species in the Eucoilinae and Miscogastrinae, as a few specimens of the eucoiline, Gronotoma domestica Girault, and the pteromalid, Halticoptera sp., have been recorded in that state without host records [58].

The braconid Opius scabriventris Nixon, the eulophid Chrysocharis flacilla (Walker), and the pteromalids Halticoptera arduine (Walker) and Halticoptera helioponi De Santis, are the most abundant species parasitizing L. huidobrensis in Argentina [68,69] and Peru [70]. Note that the sub-genus Phaedrotoma was split from Opius in 1997 [71] but has recently been synonymized with Opius [72]. The first three species have recently been introduced into Kenya for the biological control of L. huidobrensis [73,74,75,76], with O. scabriventris appearing to have established successfully [77]. The long-term outcomes of these releases will provide insights into the utility of importing and releasing exotic parasitoids in a classical biological control program targeting L. huidobrensis.

Before investing in the time-consuming and costly importation of additional exotic parasitoid species [78], the impact of endemic and adventive parasitoids in Australia on invasive Liriomyza spp. needs thorough evaluation in the field. With increased surveying efforts across Australia, together with the recent rise in L. huidobrensis and L. trifolii populations in horticultural areas, the number of identified parasitoid species is likely to increase markedly.

However, detecting candidate parasitoids is only the initial step in developing an effective biological control program for polyphagous Liriomyza species. Key challenges include ensuring that parasitoids are not adversely affected by the overuse of inappropriate insecticides and identifying and managing the reservoirs of both parasitoids and non-target agromyzids [27]. The dispersal of agromyzids and their parasitoids across cropping regions, adjacent non-crop areas, and sequentially planted crops remain poorly understood [27]. In some cases, growers could use augmentoria constructed with fine mesh to allow parasitoids to emerge from mined plant foliage while preventing Liriomyza adults from escaping [27,79].

Generally, the longer a crop remains in the ground before harvest, the greater the control of Liriomyza spp. by parasitoids due to multiple generations of parasitoids. Rapid rotation crops such as spinach and leafy greens, which remain in the ground for only 4–6 weeks, are unlikely to benefit directly from parasitoids, since the crop will be harvested before the parasitoids can develop a second generation, and mined leaves will be harvested. However, high parasitism in other crops and non-crop plants should reduce the invasion pressure of Liriomyza flies on new crops. In intensive lettuce production areas in Arizona, growers rely heavily on insecticides to manage a range of pests, with pest monitoring and the choice of appropriate chemicals the primary pest management tools [80]. Liriomyza trifolii and L. sativae are now only occasional pests in Arizona, largely due to the use of selective insecticides targeting lepidopteran pests and thrips, such as spinetoram and diamides, that preserve the natural enemies of the leafminers [81].

3. Augmentative Releases Overseas

Liriomyza bryoniae emerged as a major pest of tomatoes in north-western European glasshouses in the mid-1970s, following the adoption of rockwool or nutrient film plant cultivation systems [82,83,84]. Previously, winter soil disinfestation effectively eliminated overwintering puparia, so leafminer infestations during the crop’s growth occurred only in spring or summer due to invading flies once the plants were well-established. When this management practice ceased, L. bryoniae emerging from the overwintering puparia could infest crops immediately. The arrival of L. trifolii in European glasshouses in the late 1970s exacerbated problems, as growers were unable to achieve adequate results with conventional insecticides due to resistance. In many crops, insecticide use was curtailed to facilitate biological control of greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporarium (Westwood), by Encarsia formosa Gahan [85]. This decrease in insecticide pressure allowed two endemic species of braconid parasitoids, Dacnusa sibirica and Opius pallipes Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae), to overwinter in glasshouses alongside L. bryoniae puparia, which contributed to early season leafminer control [84]. Later in the season, the endemic eulophid ectoparasitoid, Diglyphus isaea (Walker), arrived in crops from surrounding areas and often controlled leafminer infestations when broad-spectrum insecticide applications were curtailed [86].

In the 1980s, numerous trials were undertaken in tomato glasshouses involving the natural colonization of crops by L. bryoniae and its parasitoids [82,87,88]. The highly variable colonization results prompted trials evaluating experimental releases of mass-reared parasitoids during the early stages of crop development. No systematic selection process was undertaken in Europe to identify the most appropriate species (or strains); instead, endemic species already present in glasshouses were mass reared. The imported eulophid endoparasitoid, Chrysocharis oscinidis Ashmead (previously known as C. parksi), was also assessed in several trials. Although C. oscinidis was an abundant parasitoid of L. sativae in field tomatoes in California [89], its control was inconsistent in trials [90,91,92,93], leading commercial rearing companies to concentrate on producing D. isaea sourced from local populations.

The main mass-reared parasitoid used for controlling Liriomyza spp. is D. isaea, supplemented by D. sibirica early in the season in northern Europe where Liriomyza spp. overwinter in glasshouses [94]. Both species are sold in over 20 countries and rank among the most important invertebrate biological control agents globally in augmentative biological control [95]. Other parasitoids mass-reared for Liriomyza spp. control include N. formosa, available in Asia since 1990, Diglyphus begini (Ashmead), reared in Latin America, and O. pallipes, which continues to be reared in small quantities in Europe [95,96,97].

In Brazil, detailed biological studies found that the endemic parasitoids, Chrysocharis vonones (Walker) and O. scabriventris, achieved total mean parasitism of L. sativae that was comparable to that achieved by D. isaea and N. formosa in Japan [98,99,100]. This demonstrated the great potential in assessing endemic parasitoids for augmentative control of Liriomyza species in invaded areas.

4. Augmentative Releases in Australia

To date, the only Australian work on augmentative releases was undertaken as part of a project on control of agromyzid leafminers in Australia and Indonesia [101]. Hemiptarsenus varicornis were released in the middle of 600 × 4000 mm beds, each planted with three rows of Chinese cabbage seedlings. Parasitoids were detected by placing sentinel Chinese cabbage leaves mined by L. brassicae larvae among the plants. Results showed a high level of parasitoid attack (2–3× greater than control plots), coupled with a similar difference in host mortality due to host feeding. In glasshouse releases of H. varicornis and D. isaea, both species persisted and impacted L. brassicae populations [102].

5. Assessing Candidates for Augmentative Control in Australia

Understanding the lifecycle of the polyphagous Liriomyza spp. is crucial when considering biological control agents in protected cropping. Female flies use their ovipositor to create fan-shaped feeding punctures in the epidermis, from which both female and male flies obtain nourishment through leaf exudate. The feeding punctures create a distinctive stippling on the leaf, indicating the presence of leafminers. In contrast, when the female deposits an egg beneath the leaf epidermis, the oviposition puncture is tubular [103,104].

After hatching, the first-instar larva starts to tunnel beneath the epidermis, creating the distinctive species-specific mine. The third instar exits the mine and drops to the ground to pupariate. When larval densities are high on celery, pupariation has also been seen on leaves, at the base of petioles, as well as on the soil surface [105].

Adult fly eclosion from the puparium begins around sunrise, which is also an important time for Liriomyza spp. management because of (i) mating and oviposition, and (ii) the exit of third-instar larva from mines [106,107,108]. The larval stage only occupies about 31% of the total immature developmental period, averaged over five temperatures from 10 °C to 35 °C. The egg stage accounts for 23% and the pupal stage 46% [109]. The first, second, and third larval instars of L. sativae occupy an average of 38%, 27% and 35%, respectively, of the total larval development time [110], and these periods are likely to be very similar in other Liriomyza species. Parasitoids attacking early third-instar larvae, therefore, have a limited window within the host lifecycle.

5.1. Idiobiont Eulophid Parasitoids

Most eulophid wasps (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitizing agromyzid leafminers are synovigenic idiobionts, meaning that they paralyze their host larva before oviposition or attack sessile stages such as puparia. They cause mortality by host parasitism, feeding, and stinging (where the larva is paralyzed but the female wasp does not oviposit or host feed) [111,112,113,114,115].

5.1.1. Host Parasitism

Paralysis of the agromyzid larva determines the food resource available to parasitoids at the time of oviposition. To maximize resources for wasp larvae, eggs are usually laid in or near the third instar (the oldest larval stage). Ectoparasitoids such D. isaea, H. varicornis, Cl. mirabilis and Z. latilineatum deposit their eggs next to the paralyzed larvae. After hatching, parasitoid larvae feed on the paralyzed host, pupate beside the dead host, and subsequently emerge from the mine. In contrast, idiobiont endoparasitoids, such as Neochrysocharis okazakii Kamijo and N. formosa, also paralyze the host larva but oviposit inside the larva, enabling the parasitoid larvae to feed and pupate within the host before emerging [116].

5.1.2. Host Feeding

Synovigenic idiobiont females emerge with very few eggs and need to feed on the hemolymph of hosts to sustain ovigenesis and egg maturation. Females locate and puncture smaller host larvae within mines. Wasps of both sexes then feed on hemolymph from these punctured larvae, which then die. Host feeding is closely associated with wasp fecundity and longevity [113,114,117].

5.1.3. Host Stinging

Occasionally, females paralyze agromyzid larvae without ovipositing or feeding. This stinging kills the larvae and may serve to protect the wasp’s progeny by preventing other parasitoids from ovipositing in the same host [115].

In the case of idiobiont eulophids, adult wasps emerge from the mine, complicating commercial production, as producers must sell the wasps as adults with a very short shelf life, rather than as pupae. Typically, these wasps are sold in bottles containing either 250 or 500 individuals.

5.1.4. Mass-Rearing Systems for Idiobiont Parasitoids

Systems for mass rearing of several idiobiont eulophid species have been documented, including for D. begini [118], D. isaea [119], H. varicornis [120,121,122], N. formosa [123,124], and N. okazakii [125]. However, apart from D. isaea and D. sibirica, no species has been commercialized on a large scale. Major commercial producers in Europe, Israel and North America have reared leafminer parasitoids for many years but their precise rearing protocols remain closely guarded intellectual property [126].

5.2. Koinobiont Parasitoids

Four braconid wasps parasitizing Liriomyza spp. overseas, namely D. sibirica, O. dissitus, O. pallipes and O. scabriventris, are common koinobiont larval-pupal endoparasitoids. These wasps do not paralyze the host larva at oviposition; the agromyzid larva continues mining until pupation. The parasitoid begins development only after the host larva pupates. The wasp will oviposit into any larval instar, as its development is delayed until host pupation. In most cases, the parasitoid can immunosuppress the host to prevent egg encapsulation by host haemocytes [127]. However, there have been several reports where indigenous parasitoids fail to successfully attack newly introduced agromyzids. In Europe, eggs of O. pallipes, but not those of D. sibirica, were encapsulated by L. trifolii [90]. Consequently, mass rearing and release in Europe focused on D. sibirica [83]. In contrast, the inability of D. sibirica to develop in L. sativae was considered important for the dominance of L. sativae over L. trifolii observed in Japan [128,129].

Mass-rearing techniques for D. sibirica and O. pallipes [130] using L. bryoniae on tomato have been developed, allowing one-week-old puparia to be stored at 5 °C. In the USA, mass rearing and release of Opius dissitus for control of L. sativae has been undertaken for many years at the EPCOT Center, Florida [131]. Liriomyza sativae is reared on bush lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus L. cv. Henderson) [132] and the process of collecting and counting O. dissitus pupae has been mechanized [133]. Dacnusa sibirica is released only in northern Europe during winter when temperatures are too cold for D. isaea to be effective [134].

Banacuniculus (=Ganaspidium) utilis (Beardsley) (Figitidae, Eucoilinae) is a koinobiont larval endoparasitoid. It was introduced into Hawaii from Texas and has become a dominant parasitoid of Liriomyza spp. [135,136]. It was subsequently introduced into Guam and Tonga, where it has apparently become the dominant parasitoid of L. trifolii [137].

6. Constraints Affecting Commercial Production and Deployment Success

Mass-rearing protocols published for several parasitoids of Liriomyza spp. [118,119,138,139,140] consist of three components: plant production, leafminer production and parasitoid production. Steps include:

• Maintaining a supply of host plants;
• Exposing host plants to leafminers for a short time to synchronize leafminer populations;
• Exposing leafminer-infested plants to parasitoids for a short time to synchronize parasitoid populations;
• Collecting leafminer puparia to maintain leafminer cultures;
• Maintaining parasitized leafminers (species-dependent);
• Collecting and packaging parasitoids.

Modelling of the rearing system of D. begini (closely related to D. isaea) has helped optimize production efforts [141,142].

Unfortunately, Diglyphus species are very expensive to rear. In the Philippines, the full cost of rearing 1000 D. isaea was estimated at USD 1132 [119]. Although established commercial insectaries have developed efficient large-scale rearing methods, an internet survey in June 2025 found the median retail unit cost in 2025 was USD 0.26 per wasp (assuming 1:1 sex ratio, the unit cost was USD 0.52 per female). Typically, 3–5 weekly releases are made in glasshouses per crop. Larger enterprises regularly ordering large quantities of wasps likely receive a lower unit cost per wasp. With typical release rates ranging from 0.25 to 1 wasp per m² (equivalent to 2500–10,000 wasps per ha; see

Table 6. Indicative release rates of Diglyphus isaea [Miglyphus^®] [143].

Miglyphus®	Light Infestation	Heavy Infestation
Rate m2/unit (500 wasps)	2000	500
Rate wasps/m2	0.25	1
Rate wasps/ha	2500	10,000
Interval (days)	7	7
Frequency	min. 3×	min. 3×
∑wasps/ha	7500	30,000
Remarks	if >1 larva/10 plants	if >1 larva/3 plants

) and a cost of USD 0.13 per D. isaea wasp, each release can cost between USD 325 to USD 1300 per ha. Given these expenses, augmentative use of commercially reared D. isaea in open-field situations is unlikely to be cost-effective.

Diglyphus isaea and D. sibirica are the major parasitoid species of Liriomyza spp. reared worldwide, with one hundred thousand to millions of individuals sold per week [97]. Production of D. begini (Latin America) and N. formosa (Asia) is in the range of ten thousand to one hundred thousand individuals sold per week. In contrast, small numbers of O. pallipes (hundreds to a few thousand wasps sold per week) are distributed in Europe [97].

6.1. Storage

Production costs remain high because the adult wasps have a very short shelf life, and cold storage can affect a range of fitness-related traits [144]. For mass-reared D. isaea, cold storage has been investigated to extend the storage life and accommodate unpredictable demand. In laboratory trials, D. isaea wasps, stored at 4 °C for 120 days (and fed with honey and sucrose solution solidified in agar), had higher survival and fecundity than wasps stored at 10 °C [145]. In contrast, trials storing D. isaea at 15 °C, 20 °C and 26 °C for one month found optimal performance at 20 °C [146]. Notably, the sex ratio (% males) decreased to 29% at 26 °C, compared with 54% at 15 °C and 44% at 20 °C [146]. Additionally, D. isaea kills many hosts for food, thereby diminishing the yield of parasitoids. For example, at 27 °C, D. isaea females had a mean lifetime fecundity of 126 eggs but caused the death of 319 host larvae (through oviposition, host feeding and host stinging) [113].

To maximize the fertility of H. varicornis for mass rearing, suitable conditions for storing wasps were found to be, in priority: (i) female wasps at 15 °C for 10 days; (ii) female wasps at 15 °C for 20–30 days or 25 °C for 10–15 days; and (iii) 1-day-old pupae at 10 °C for 1–4 weeks [147]. For field releases, where host-killing is more important than fertility, suitable conditions for storing wasps were, in priority: (i) female wasps at 15 °C for 10–30 days or 25 °C for 10–15 days; and (ii) female wasps at 15 °C for 40 days or 1-day-old pupae at 10 °C for 1–4 weeks [147].

6.2. Quality Control of Mass-Reared Natural Enemies

Maintaining high-quality, mass-reared natural enemies is challenging. Selection for traits favoring production efficiency in mass-rearing facilities, such as reduced ability to disperse and high parasitism rates at high host density, can reduce effectiveness in the field, where high dispersal activity and high parasitism levels at low host density are preferred [94,148,149]. To overcome the rapid rate of laboratory adaptation in laboratory cultures, populations destined for field release should be reared under conditions that minimize field fitness loss and/or colonies should be renewed regularly from field material [150]. Quality control protocols for mass-reared arthropods used in augmentative releases in protected cropping have been implemented extensively in commercial insectaries in Europe and the USA [151,152].

6.3. Biased Sex Ratios

A major issue in mass rearing D. isaea is the overproduction of males. For example, samples from commercial insectaries showed a male proportion of 0.77 (n = 241) [153]. Assuming a conservative cost of USD 0.13 per wasp, the cost per female is approximately USD 0.57. This issue can be partly mitigated by manipulating host sizes offered to the wasps [154,155], but this approach adds complexity to the rearing system.

6.4. On-Farm Management

Leafminer damage can occur before parasitoids are able to reduce populations. In glasshouse chrysanthemum crops in the Netherlands, preventative introductions (five-weekly releases) of D. isaea still required an initial treatment with cyromazine (an insect growth regulator) to reduce initial numbers of leafminer larvae [156]. However, multiple cyromazine applications prevented the establishment of D. isaea. Establishing D. isaea was also difficult in winter when growth lights attracted and killed adult parasitoids [156]. Costs could be reduced by redistributing parasitoids produced early in the season to other parts of the glasshouse later in the season, effectively creating a within-crop rearing system [79,157], a method also used successfully in Kenya [158]. Growers can harvest heavily mined and parasitized milk thistle (Sonchus arvensis) plants from outside crops as a source of D. isaea [134]. This requires placing leaf material in small, screened cages (an augmentorium) with a mesh smaller than 625 μm [159,160], allowing parasitoids to exit while retaining leafminer flies.

Management issues for other pests can also drive adoption of leafminer biological control. For example, in Canada, biological control in ornamental crops has increased greatly in recent years due to difficulties controlling western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande) resistant to spinosad [161]. Canadian chrysanthemum and gerbera growers largely rely on D. isaea releases because chemicals registered for control of L. trifolii harm predatory mites used to control thrips, as well as these chemicals becoming ineffective due to increasing resistance issues in L. trifolii [9].

7. Overcoming Barriers to Mass Rearing

Mass-produced agromyzid parasitoids are expensive when needed in large quantities because hosts must be reared and exposed to wasps on living plants. They are expected to be economical for protected cropping, particularly when multiple early releases of idiobiont wasps, such as D. isaea, H. varicornis, or N. formosa, are needed to ensure substantial host killing alongside parasitism. Koinobiont species such as Opius spp. do not host feed, and parasitized Liriomyza larvae continue mining leaves until pupation. In Australia, releasing Opius spp. in protected cropping would only be worthwhile for long-lived crops (where multiple generations of Liriomyza occur) or in situations where Liriomyza spp. overwinter in greenhouses.

Diglyphus isaea is widely reared and used overseas, largely because of its relatively high fecundity. While attempts to mass rear H. varicornis and N. formosa have been made overseas, these are seldom mass reared commercially. Based on the long-term experiences in Europe and the USA, we recommend D. isaea as the prime target parasitoid for mass rearing against L. sativae. Fortuitously, D. isaea is already present in Australia. It was first found in Sydney, NSW, in September 2001 [162] and has since been found in Victoria [30], Tasmania (P.M. Ridland, unpublished data) and the Australian Capital Territory [31], frequently parasitizing P. syngenesiae on sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus) and P. plantaginis on Plantago lanceolata [34]. The species has been cultured in the laboratory in Australia [163] using L. brassicae reared on Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) at 22 °C, with egg-adult development times of 13 days for females and 12 days for males.

As with other adventive biological agents in Australia, such as the aphid parasitoid, Diaeretiella rapae (McIntosh) [164], Australian founding populations of D. isaea likely have reduced genetic diversity compared to global populations. It would be important to test the biological characteristics of D. isaea populations from different Australian regions to select the most suitable strain for mass rearing [165].

While mortality caused by host feeding by idiobiont wasps is important for growers, commercial insectaries must maximize female wasp production from a given batch of host Liriomyza larvae. Male wasps are less useful since they do not paralyze larvae and only host-feed on larvae paralyzed by females [166].

To improve the economics of mass-reared parasitoids, thelytokous strains could be used, since all parasitized hosts will produce only females [167,168,169,170]. This benefits both growers and commercial insectaries since every wasp released will target Liriomyza larvae.

Thelytokous strains may result from endosymbiont infection or through host nuclear changes. Strains would need to be tested to ensure fecundity and longevity match or exceed those of arrhenotokous populations [171].

Thelytokous strains of N. formosa are associated with Rickettsia infection in Japan [172,173,174,175], China [176], and Australia [32,33]. Life table and host killing studies show thelytokous N. formosa have superior biocontrol potential compared to arrhenotokous populations [177]. However, in Japan, the thelytokous strain of N. formosa does not appear to have been widely utilized, with growers relying on D. isaea and D. sibirica imported from Europe [129]. In reported studies of bacterial endosymbionts infecting Eulophidae, Rickettsia infections were much more abundant (53%; n = 379) compared to Wolbachia (3.6%; n = 250) and Cardinium infections (0%; n = 215) [178]. These data come from 36 species from 20 genera, and may be skewed towards testing of observed thelytokous strains, with only a very small number of the >6000 described eulophid species tested [179].

In Australia, three eulophid species parasitizing agromyzids appear to be thelytokous: N. formosa, Proacrias sp. and Aprostocetus sp. [32,33]. All are infected with the endosymbiont Rickettsia; however, none of these species has high fecundity to match D. isaea. More detailed testing is needed to assess the extent of infection within each species and to treat lines with antibiotics to see if Rickettsia removal leads to arrhenotoky [180]. In Queensland, thelytokous N. formosa (infected with Rickettsia) and arrhenotokous N. okazakii (infected with the same Rickettsia and also a Wolbachia strain) were found in the same celery field [33]. Further studies are needed to determine if Wolbachia prevents thelytoky in N. okazakii, or if N. formosa might acquire the same Wolbachia strain. A female-only line of D. isaea could be the ideal, economically sustainable mass-rearing candidate. Transfer of thelytoky-inducing Rickettsia into Australian cultures of D. isaea through microinjection might be possible but is challenging [181].

Thelytoky can result from alleles in the insect’s own genome [182], and these alleles and their associated phenotypes may segregate within and between populations of the same species. For instance, arrhenotokous and thelytokous populations of Anaphes diana Girault, a mymarid parasitoid of Sitona spp., occur sympatrically in the Mediterranean region [167,183]. Recently, a thelytokous strain of Diglyphus wani Liu, Zhu & Yefremova was identified in Chinese horticultural regions, predominantly located at higher latitudes (36–43° N), whereas an arrhenotokous strain was observed at lower latitudes (25° N) [184,185]. This appears to be a case of geographic parthenogenesis [186] and suggests searching for thelytokous strains of species like D. isaea and H. varicornis could be focused on higher latitudes in Australia.

In the case of D. wani, life table analyses showed the thelytokous strain had a higher intrinsic growth rate (r_m) and total host-killing ability than arrhenotokous strains [187]. Although a very low level (0.1%) of Rickettsia was detected in the thelytokous strain, there was no evidence that the endosymbiont induced the observed thelytoky; female wasps consistently produced only female offspring for five generations following tetracycline treatment or heat treatments aimed at eliminating Rickettsia [188,189], indicating that the Rickettsia infection was not responsible. Cytological examination and genetic analyses have confirmed this as the first documented case of apomictic thelytoky in the Eulophidae unrelated to endosymbionts [189].

8. Concluding Remarks

Australia’s rich endemic parasitoid fauna is likely to play a central role in controlling invasive, polyphagous Liriomyza spp. as they continue to spread into horticultural regions. Before considering the importation of exotic parasitoid species, it is essential to thoroughly assess the composition and impact of endemic parasitoid communities. Protecting these natural enemies from the overuse of non-selective insecticides and managing reservoirs of both parasitoids and non-target agromyzids remain critical priorities [27]. These principles apply equally if exotic parasitoids are introduced.

Improved taxonomic resolution of parasitoids attacking Liriomyza spp. and the development of molecular markers will enhance identification and impact assessment. Metabarcoding approaches offer a high-throughput means of screening large numbers of wasp samples and tracking community dynamics.

Advances in mass rearing may come from the identification of thelytokous strains or manipulating parasitoids with endosymbionts to create novel thelytokous strains. The suitability of these strains must be assessed through tests of fecundity, host feeding, thermal biology, endosymbiont status, searching efficiency and parasitism efficiency at low host density [86,187]. Modern genetic and genomic tools also offer opportunities to improve the efficacy of existing and new biocontrol agents [190].

While adventive species like D. isaea are likely to play an important role in biocontrol, potentially valuable endemic species should not be overlooked. For example, the capacity of L. trifolii and L. sativae to encapsulate eggs of endemic Australian Opius species remains unknown [63], despite O. cinerariae being a common parasitoid of L. huidobrensis in Queensland [33]. Opius attack a broad host range of agromyzids in Australia, including L. brassicae, P. plantaginis and P. syngenesiae [27], and O. cinerariae has already been successfully reared in the laboratory using L. brassicae as a host [29]. Likewise, endemic eulophids such as Z. latilineatum and C. mirabilis, and the pteromalid, T. parasitica, warrant closer study for their potential as effective biocontrol agents [27].