Next Article in Journal
Effects of Red and Blue Laser Irradiation on the Growth and Development of Ostrinia furnacalis
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Citizen Science and Field Sampling into Next-Generation Early-Warning Systems for Vector Surveillance: Twenty Years of Municipal Detections of Aedes Invasive Mosquito Species in Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Isolation and Quantification of L-Tryptophan from Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis Larvae as a Marker for the Quality Control of an Edible Insect Extract

Korean Medicine (KM) Application Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daegu 41062, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(9), 905; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090905
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 15 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Physiology, Reproduction and Development)

Simple Summary

Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis (Kolbe, 1886; Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea), commonly called white-spotted flower chafer larvae and traditionally used in East Asian medicine, are gaining attention as edible insects with functional properties. However, their broader application is limited by the insufficient identification of marker compounds. In this study, a major component of the 70% ethanol extract of P. brevitarsis was isolated and identified as L-tryptophan, an essential amino acid. A high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) method was developed for its accurate quantification, confirming that L-tryptophan is a consistently detectable and analytically reliable constituent. These results indicate that L-tryptophan may serve as a quality marker, contributing to the standardization and quality control of insect-derived functional materials.

Abstract

Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis (Kolbe, 1886) larvae have traditionally been used in East Asian medicine and have recently attracted attention as functional food ingredients because of their pharmacological potential. However, chemical investigations remain limited, and no marker compounds have been established for quality control. This study aimed to isolate and identify a primary constituent from the 70% ethanol extract of P. brevitarsis (PBE) and to develop an analytical method for its quantification. Among the solvent-partitioned fractions, the n-butanol fraction (PBE-B) exhibited a major peak in HPLC analysis. The compound was purified through a combination of vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC), medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC), and recycling preparative HPLC. Its structure was identified as L-tryptophan based on HR-ESI-MS and NMR spectroscopy. Quantitative analysis was conducted using HPLC-DAD under optimized analytical conditions, employing a Thermo Scientific™ Acclaim™ Polar Advantage II column and an acidified mobile phase (0.1% formic acid in water and methanol) to improve resolution. The method demonstrated excellent linearity (r2 > 0.9999), and the L-tryptophan content in PBE was determined to be 1.93 ± 0.05 μg/mg. The analyte was well separated with minimal interference, supporting the reproducibility of the method. These results indicate that L-tryptophan is a promising candidate Q-marker for the quality control of P. brevitarsis extracts.

1. Introduction

Edible insects are increasingly recognized as a sustainable source of protein, offering high nutritional value with a lower environmental footprint. Compared to conventional livestock, they require substantially less land, water, and feed and emit fewer greenhouse gases [1,2]. Their protein content may reach up to 77% (composition can vary depending on species, developmental stage, and nutrition) on a dry weight basis and is accompanied by a balanced profile of essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals [3,4,5]. These characteristics support their potential as an alternative to conventional animal proteins in addressing global nutritional demands. Beyond their macronutrient value, edible insects also contain functional compounds such as peptides, antioxidants, and chitin, which have been linked to physiological benefits, including immune modulation and gut health enhancement [6,7]. It is important to note that chitin may cause allergic reactions. Additionally, insect-derived peptides have been reported to exert antihypertensive, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities, supporting their potential application as functional food ingredients [8,9].
Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis (Kolbe, 1886) larvae are regarded as a representative edible insect and have been traditionally used in East Asian countries, such as Korea and China, for managing conditions including liver disease, urinary dysfunction, breast cancer, and inflammation [10,11,12].
Pharmacological studies have reported that ethanol extracts of P. brevitarsis prevent bone loss and inhibit osteoclastogenesis, supporting their anti-osteoporotic potential [13]. Additional findings include neuroprotective effects against trimethyltin-induced damage [14], amelioration of benign prostatic hyperplasia [15], and improvement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [16].
Despite increasing interest in its pharmacological effects and industrial potential, chemical studies on P. brevitarsis are still limited. Recent research has identified bioactive constituents, including unsaturated fatty acids, amino acid derivatives, and small molecules such as quinoxaline and dopamine derivatives, some of which show tyrosinase inhibitory activity [17,18]. In addition, several indole alkaloids isolated from P. brevitarsis larvae have been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation and exert antithrombotic effects, suggesting further therapeutic potential [19]. However, research on the isolation and quantification of specific marker compounds remains insufficient. To date, no constituent has been widely recognized for use in quality control, and standardized protocols for compositional analysis have yet to be established. This may limit the reproducibility and consistency of extract evaluation. Further research is necessary to identify reliable candidates suitable for quantitative assessment and standardization.
In this study, we isolated a primary constituent from P. brevitarsis, elucidated its structure, and developed a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) method for its quantification. Given its relatively high yield, well-characterized structure, and precise quantification, this compound is a promising candidate as a quality marker (Q-marker) for the quality control and standardization of P. brevitarsis, which is a compound selected to represent the chemical characteristics of a complex biological or natural product for the purpose of quality control and standardization. Q-markers are typically chosen based on their abundance, stability, reproducibility across production batches, and relevance to the biological or functional properties of the material. In this regard, the use of standardized samples produced under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions, with demonstrated high reproducibility across independent production batches, is critical to ensuring batch-to-batch consistency and the reliability of quality control procedures. This approach reinforces the validity of compositional analyses and facilitates the establishment of robust quality standards for P. brevitarsis. Accordingly, the present work not only addresses the current lack of well-defined marker compounds for this species but also provides a reproducible analytical framework that can support future pharmacological and industrial applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Procedures

For column chromatography (CC), normal-phase silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 70–230, and 230–400 mesh; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 and RP-18 F254S plates (0.25 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). A 10% (v/v) aqueous sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solution was used as a spray reagent to visualize the TLC spots.
Medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) was carried out on an Isolera One system fitted with SNAP KP-SIL and SNAP Ultra C18 cartridges (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden). Recycling preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (Recycling preparative HPLC) was performed using an LC-9130G NEXT instrument equipped with a JAI GEL-GS310 column (20 × 500 mm; Japan Analytical Industry Co., Tokyo, Japan). Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained using a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer (1H at 400 MHz, 13C at 100 MHz; Bruker Biospin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) was conducted using a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system and a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA).
EP-grade solvents used for extraction, fractionation, and isolation were obtained from DAEJUNG Chemicals & Metals Co., Ltd. (Siheung, Republic of Korea). HPLC- and MS-grade methanol (MeOH), acetonitrile (ACN), water, and formic acid (FA) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Deuterium oxide (D2O), the deuterated solvent for NMR analysis, was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The L-tryptophan reference standard (≥98% purity) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Edible Insect Material

The freeze-dried powder of P. brevitarsis larvae used in this study was provided by the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences at the Rural Development Administration (Wanju, Republic of Korea). The production and processing methods for the powder have been described in detail in a previous study [13]. For preparation of the 70% ethanol (EtOH) extract, the freeze-dried powder of P. brevitarsis larvae was entrusted to the Food Research Center at the Jeonnam Bioindustry Foundation (Naju, Republic of Korea). Extracts were produced under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions (1:10 v/v; 75 °C; 6 h; one-time extraction; freeze-drying). Reproducibility under the standardized production process was confirmed through analysis of three independent production batches (Figure S1). A voucher specimen (KIOM-AP-LH-407) was deposited in the herbarium of the KM Application Center at the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (Daegu, Republic of Korea).

2.3. Isolation of the Major Compound

Preliminary HPLC screening of the P. brevitarsis ethanol extract (PBE) revealed a prominent peak corresponding to a major compound in the extract. The fractionation and isolation workflow is illustrated in Scheme 1. To isolate this major compound, 100 g of the 70% ethanol extract (PBE) was first suspended in distilled water and then successively partitioned with equal volumes of n-hexane, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and n-butanol (n-BuOH). This procedure yielded the following fractions: n-hexane fraction (PBE-H, 1.37 g), EtOAc fraction (PBE-E, 1.40 g), n-BuOH fraction (PBE-B, 6.81 g), and the remaining aqueous fraction (58.11 g, PBE-W). Among them, PBE-B, which showed the most prominent peak in HPLC chromatograms, was selected for further isolation. Fraction PBE-B (6.81 g) was further subjected to vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) on a silica gel column (12.0 × 12.0 cm). A total of six fractions (A–F) were obtained using a stepwise elution with chloroform/methanol (CHCl3:MeOH, v/v) mixtures at 10:1, 8:1, 6:1, 4:1, 2:1, and finally 100% MeOH. Fraction E was further separated by MPLC on a SNAP Ultra C18 cartridge using a gradient elution of MeOH–H2O (10–50% MeOH, v/v), yielding three sub-fractions (Frs. EA–EC). Sub-fraction EB was further purified using recycling preparative HPLC under isocratic elution with MeOH–H2O (10% MeOH, v/v), resulting in the isolation of the major compound (70.0 mg).
The structural elucidation of the isolated major compound was performed using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer at room temperature, using deuterated methanol (CD3OD) as the solvent. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the solvent signal, and coupling constants (J) are given in Hertz (Hz). The NMR data were used to confirm the chemical structure of the isolated compound.
L-Tryptophan: White amorphous powder; C11H12N2O2; HR-MS m/z 205.0973 [M + H]+ (calcd. 205.0971); 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 7.68 (1H, dt, J = 8.1, 1.1 Hz, H-4), 7.49 (1H, dt, J = 8.1, 1.1 Hz, H-7), 7.26 (1H, s, H-2), 7.23 (1H, ddd, J = 8.1, 7.0, 1.1 Hz, H-6), 7.15 (1H, ddd, J = 8.1, 7.0, 1.1 Hz, H-5), 3.99 (1H, m, H-9), 3.44 (1H, dd, J = 15.3, 4.8 Hz, H-8), 3.25 (1H, dd, J = 15.3, 8.1 Hz, H-8); 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O) δ 174.5 (C-10), 136.3 (C-7a), 126.6 (C-3a), 125.0 (C-2), 122.1 (C-6) 119.5 (C-5), 118.4 (C-4), 111.9 (C-7), 107.4 (C-3), 55.0 (C-9), 26.4 (C-8).

2.4. Preparation of Standard Solutions and Samples

A stock solution of the standard compound was prepared by dissolving it in MeOH to a concentration of 1000 μg/mL. For sample preparation, PBE and PBE-B were dissolved in MeOH at final concentrations of 20 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL, respectively. Prior to analysis, all solutions were filtered through a 0.22 μm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany).

2.5. Chromatographic Conditions

Quantitative analysis of L-tryptophan in the PBE and PBE-B samples was performed using a Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a binary pump, auto-sampler, column oven, and diode array detector (DAD). Chromatographic data were collected and processed using the Chromeleon™ 7 chromatography data system (version 7.2.2.6394; Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Thermo Acclaim™ Polar Advantage II column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The column temperature was maintained at 30 °C, and the injection volume was set to 5 µL. UV detection was performed at 280 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% (v/v) FA in water (solvent A) and MeOH (solvent B), with gradient elution programmed as follows: 0–10 min, 0.2% B; 10–20 min, 0.2–6.5% B; 20–25 min, 6.5–30% B; 25–35 min, 30–100% B; and 35–40 min, 100% B. The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL/min. Following each run, the column was re-equilibrated to the initial conditions for 10 min prior to the next injection.
The chromatographic method was validated in accordance with ICH (Q2) guidelines. Standard solutions of L-tryptophan were subsequently diluted in MeOH to obtain final concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL. Calibration curves for the quantification of L-tryptophan were prepared using these standards. Linearity over this range was evaluated by calculating the correlation coefficient (r2) for each curve. The calibration curves were obtained by plotting the peak area versus the corresponding analyte concentration, and the regression equations were expressed as y = ax ± b, where y is the peak area and x is the analyte concentration. Quantification of L-tryptophan in the PBE and PBE-B samples was performed based on the external standard method, using the established calibration curve. Each sample was analyzed in quintuplicate (n = 5), and the results were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 and 10, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analytical Characterization of a Major Compound from PBE

Freeze-dried P. brevitarsis larvae powder was extracted with 70% EtOH to obtain a crude ethanol extract (PBE), which was subsequently fractionated using n-hexane, EtOAc, and n-BuOH, yielding the PBE-H, PBE-E, and PBE-B fractions, respectively. To identify the primary constituents of P. brevitarsis larvae, HPLC analysis was performed on the PBE and its fractions. According to the chromatographic profiles presented in Figure S2, both the PBE and PBE-B showed a major peak at approximately 26 min, with PBE-B exhibiting the highest intensity of this peak. These results suggest that the main component of P. brevitarsis larvae is predominantly enriched in fraction PBE-B. To further confirm the identity of the major peak, HR-MS analysis was performed to determine its exact molecular mass. The target peak detected in PBE-B yielded a protonated molecular ion at m/z 205.0973 [M + H]+ (calcd. 205.0971 for C11H13N2O2), corresponding to the molecular formula C11H12N2O2 (Figure S4). The observed m/z value and the associated elemental composition suggested that the compound was likely an amino acid. The major component of PBE-B, as identified by HPLC and MS analyses, was subsequently isolated and purified.

3.2. Isolation and Structural Characterization

Chromatographic separation of PBE-B (6.81 g) by VLC on silica gel yielded six fractions (A–F), among which fraction E was further separated by MPLC to yield three sub-fractions (EA–EC). Subsequent purification of sub-fraction EB by recycling preparative HPLC yielded a single compound (70.0 mg), corresponding to the major peak previously observed in the PBE-B fraction.
NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the chemical structure of the isolated compound. The 1H NMR spectrum (400 MHz, D2O) exhibited characteristic signals for an indole moiety, including a singlet at δH 7.26 (H-2), along with four aromatic protons between δH 7.15 and 7.68 (H-4 to H-7), consistent with a five-substituted indole ring. Aliphatic proton signals appeared at δH 3.99 (H-9, methine) and δH 3.44/3.25 (H-8, methylene), corresponding to the α- and β-protons of tryptophan. The 13C NMR data further confirmed the presence of 11 carbon signals, including a carboxylic acid carbon at δC 174.5 (C-10), indole carbons between δC 107.4 and 136.3, and aliphatic carbons at δC 55.0 (C-9) and 26.4 (C-8) (Figures S5 and S6). Based on detailed spectroscopic analysis and comparison with reported literature data [17], the compound was identified as L-tryptophan, and its chemical structure is depicted in Figure 1.

3.3. Optimization of HPLC Conditions for Quantitative Analysis

Prior to establishing the optimized analytical conditions, the identity of the isolated compound was confirmed by comparing its retention time and UV spectrum with those of the L-tryptophan reference standard using HPLC-DAD analysis. These results are shown in Figure 2, which presents the HPLC chromatograms of the reference L-tryptophan standard (A), the isolated compound (B), the PBE (C), and PBE-B (D). After confirming the identity of the main compound, the same HPLC platform was optimized for its quantitative analysis in the PBE. This procedure was designed to enable the reliable detection of the marker compound and to support the establishment of content criteria for the quality control and standardization of PBE.
Optimized HPLC-DAD conditions for the quantification of L-tryptophan in PBE were established as follows: To improve chromatographic resolution, 0.1% (v/v) FA was added to the aqueous phase, and MeOH was used as the organic phase under a gradient elution program [20]. FA acidified the mobile phase, enhancing the ionization of L-tryptophan and reducing peak tailing by minimizing interactions between the analyte and the stationary phase. As a result, peak symmetry and resolution were improved, leading to increased detection sensitivity and reproducibility. To further improve the resolution of the highly polar compound L-tryptophan, a Thermo Scientific™ Acclaim™ Polar Advantage II (PA2) column was employed. This column features a polar-embedded stationary phase that enhances selectivity and retention for polar analytes under reversed-phase conditions. It is compatible with 100% aqueous mobile phases and remains stable over a broad pH range (1.5–10), allowing for efficient separation of acidic, basic, and neutral compounds with minimal peak tailing. In this study, the combination of an optimized mobile phase and a PA2 column effectively separated L-tryptophan and improved peak shape and resolution, thereby enhancing analytical sensitivity and reproducibility.

3.4. Quantitative Determination of L-Tryptophan in PBE

The developed method enabled accurate quantification and reliable identification of the marker compound in PBE. As shown in Figure 2, it was well separated with excellent resolution within 40 min, and interference from other components was minimal. The analysis was performed at 280 nm, the characteristic absorption wavelength of L-tryptophan. The peak was identified by comparing its retention time (tR; 26.28 min for standard, 26.27 min for isolated compound, 26.30 min for PBE, and 26.31 min for PBE-B), UV spectrum, and chromatographic profile with those of the standard compound.
As shown in Table 1, L-tryptophan was successfully quantified in the PBE sample using the established calibration curve, which exhibited excellent linearity over the tested range (r2 > 0.9999, n = 5). The LOQ and LOD were calculated based on a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 10 and 3, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the calculated LOD was 3.28 μg/mL, and the LOQ was 9.95 μg/mL. The relatively high LOD and LOQ values observed in this study are attributable to the use of UV detection, which is inherently less sensitive than mass spectrometry- or fluorescence detection-based methods [21]. These observations are similar to those of previous studies on amino acids, including L-tryptophan [22]. Nonetheless, UV detection offers advantages in terms of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and operational simplicity, making it suitable for routine quality control. The RSD at the LOQ level was 1.42%, remaining well within the accepted threshold of 2%, thereby indicating the adequate precision and analytical robustness of the method. These results support the application of the method to quantitative analysis of L-tryptophan in PBE. Based on the resulting regression equation, the content of L-tryptophan was determined to be 1.93 ± 0.05 μg/mg (with the yield of L-tryptophan as 0.193 ± 0.005% of crude extract), with an RSD of 0.72% (n = 3).
The analyte was clearly detected without interference, and the results demonstrated high reproducibility across replicates.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, L-tryptophan was selected as a quality control (QC) marker for Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larval extracts produced under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions. This selection was based on repeated fractionation and compositional analyses, which consistently revealed L-tryptophan as the most abundant low-molecular-weight compound with minimal batch-to-batch variation across three independent production lots from a GMP-certified facility designated by the Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea. While L-tryptophan is a common amino acid and not unique to P. brevitarsis, its high abundance, stability under standardized production conditions, and reproducibility in quantitative analysis make it a practical marker for routine QC testing. In other functional food materials, widely distributed compounds such as resveratrol and chlorogenic acid are similarly used as QC markers when they demonstrate such characteristics. We acknowledge that additional studies are needed to assess its correlation with functional properties, stability under suboptimal processing or storage conditions, and variability across different rearing environments. These aspects will be addressed in future collaborative research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16090905/s1: Figure S1: HPLC-DAD chromatograms of the reference L-tryptophan standard, the isolated compound, and the three batches of the 70% EtOH extract of P. brevitarsis larvae (PBE); Figure S2: HPLC-DAD chromatograms of PBE and its fractions (PBE-H, PBE-E, PBE-B, and PBE-W) derived from P. brevitarsis larvae; Figure S3: Overlaid HPLC-DAD chromatograms of the reference L-tryptophan standard, the isolated compound, the 70% EtOH extract of P. brevitarsis larvae (PBE), and the n-BuOH fraction (PBE-B), with an enlarged view of the highlighted region; Figure S4: HR-ESI-MS spectrum of the major peak in the PBE-B fraction; Figure S5: 1H NMR spectrum of the isolated compound (400 MHz, D2O); Figure S6: 13C NMR spectrum of the isolated compound (100 MHz, D2O).

Author Contributions

H.J.Y.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation; W.L.: supervision, resources, writing—review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea (RS-2024-00392136).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. van Huis, A. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 563–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Halloran, A.; Roos, N.; Eilenberg, J.; Cerutti, A.; Bruun, S. Life cycle assessment of edible insects for food protein: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rumpold, B.A.; Schlüter, O.K. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 802–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Payne, C.L.; Scarborough, P.; Rayner, M.; Nonaka, K. Are edible insects more or less ‘healthy’ than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dobermann, D.; Swift, J.A.; Field, L.M. Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutr. Bull. 2017, 42, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Williams, J.P.; Williams, J.R.; Kirabo, A.; Chester, D.; Peterson, M. Chapter 3—Nutrient Content and Health Benefits of Insects. In Insects as Sustainable Food Ingredients; Dossey, A.T., Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jantzen da Silva Lucas, A.; Menegon de Oliveira, L.; da Rocha, M.; Prentice, C. Edible insects: An alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds. Food Chem. 2020, 311, 126022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xavier, J.R.; Sanjay, B.S.; Gupta, D.; Mehta, S.; Chauhan, O.P. Bioactive compounds of foods: Phytochemicals and peptides. Food Humanit. 2024, 3, 100354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferrazzano, G.F.; D’Ambrosio, F.; Caruso, S.; Gatto, R.; Caruso, S. Bioactive Peptides Derived from Edible Insects: Effects on Human Health and Possible Applications in Dentistry. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yeo, H.; Youn, K.; Kim, M.; Yun, E.Y.; Hwang, J.S.; Jeong, W.S.; Jun, M. Fatty Acid Composition and Volatile Constituents of Protaetia brevitarsis Larvae. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 18, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Suh, H.J.; Kang, S.C. Antioxidant activity of aqueous methanol extracts of Protaetia brevitarsis Lewis (Coleoptera: Scarabaedia) at different growth stages. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kang, M.; Kang, C.; Lee, H.; Kim, E.; Kim, J.; Kwon, O.; Lee, H.; Kang, H.; Kim, C.; Jang, H. Effects of fermented aloe vera mixed diet on larval growth of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis (Kolbe) (coleopteran:Cetoniidae) and protective effects of its extract against CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in Sprague–Dawley rats. Entomol. Res. 2012, 42, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choi, R.-Y.; Kim, I.-W.; Ji, M.; Paik, M.-J.; Ban, E.-J.; Lee, J.H.; Hwang, J.S.; Kweon, H.; Seo, M. Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larvae ethanol extract inhibits RANKL-stimulated osteoclastogenesis and ameliorates bone loss in ovariectomized mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 165, 115112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, S.; Seo, Y.H.; Song, J.H.; Kim, W.J.; Lee, J.H.; Moon, B.C.; Ang, M.J.; Kim, S.H.; Moon, C.; Lee, J.; et al. Neuroprotective Effect of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis’ Water Extract on Trimethyltin-Induced Seizures and Hippocampal Neurodegeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Seo, Y.S.; Shin, N.R.; Nam, H.H.; Song, J.H.; Cheol Moon, B.; Choi, G.; Shin, I.S.; Kim, J.S. Effects of larval extracts from identified Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis against benign prostatic hyperplasia induced by testosterone in rats. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 5361–5369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Im, A.R.; Yang, W.K.; Park, Y.C.; Kim, S.H.; Chae, S. Hepatoprotective Effects of Insect Extracts in an Animal Model of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nutrients 2018, 10, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, J.; Hwang, I.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, M.A.; Hwang, J.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Na, M. Quinoxaline-, dopamine-, and amino acid-derived metabolites from the edible insect Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2017, 40, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yoon, C.H.; Jeon, S.H.; Ha, Y.J.; Kim, S.W.; Bang, W.Y.; Bang, K.H.; Gal, S.W.; Kim, I.S.; Cho, Y.S. Functional Chemical Components in Protaetia brevitarsis Larvae: Impact of Supplementary Feeds. Food. Sci. Anim. Resour. 2020, 40, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, J.; Lee, W.; Kim, M.A.; Hwang, J.S.; Na, M.; Bae, J.S. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombosis by indole alkaloids isolated from the edible insect Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis (Kolbe). J. Cell Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. la Cour, R.; Jørgensen, H.; Schjoerring, J.K. Improvement of Tryptophan Analysis by Liquid Chromatography-Single Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry Through the Evaluation of Multiple Parameters. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dai, Z.; Sun, S.; Chen, H.; Liu, M.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Wu, G. Analysis of Tryptophan and Its Metabolites by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. In Amino Acid Analysis: Methods and Protocols; Alterman, M., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 2030, pp. 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eid, S.M.; Farag, M.A.; Bawazeer, S. Underivatized Amino Acid Chromatographic Separation: Optimized Conditions for HPLC-UV Simultaneous Quantification of Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Threonine, Histidine, Valine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Tryptophan, and Tyrosine in Dietary Supplements. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 31106–31114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Fractionation and isolation scheme of the 70% EtOH extract of P. brevitarsis larvae (C: chloroform; M: methanol; EtOAc: ethyl acetate; n-BuOH: butanol; VLC: vacuum liquid chromatography; C.C: column chromatography; MPLC: medium-pressure liquid chromatography).
Scheme 1. Fractionation and isolation scheme of the 70% EtOH extract of P. brevitarsis larvae (C: chloroform; M: methanol; EtOAc: ethyl acetate; n-BuOH: butanol; VLC: vacuum liquid chromatography; C.C: column chromatography; MPLC: medium-pressure liquid chromatography).
Insects 16 00905 sch001
Figure 1. Chemical structure of L-tryptophan isolated from P. brevitarsis larvae.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of L-tryptophan isolated from P. brevitarsis larvae.
Insects 16 00905 g001
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms showing the retention time comparison among (A) the reference L-tryptophan standard, (B) the isolated compound, (C) the 70% EtOH extract of P. brevitarsis larvae (PBE), and (D) the n-BuOH fraction (PBE-B).
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms showing the retention time comparison among (A) the reference L-tryptophan standard, (B) the isolated compound, (C) the 70% EtOH extract of P. brevitarsis larvae (PBE), and (D) the n-BuOH fraction (PBE-B).
Insects 16 00905 g002
Table 1. Analytical parameters and L-tryptophan content in PBE through HPLC-DAD.
Table 1. Analytical parameters and L-tryptophan content in PBE through HPLC-DAD.
AnalyteRange
(µg/mL)
Linear Regression
Equation 1
Correlation Coefficient
(n = 5)
RSD 2 (%)LOD
(μg/mL)
LOQ
(μg/mL)
Content
(μg/mg)
L-Tryptophan25–400y = 0.1551x + 0.64520.99991.42%3.289.951.93 ± 0.05
1 y: peak area; x: concentration (μg/mL); 2 %RSD reflects repeatability at the LOQ level, indicating acceptable precision.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, H.J.; Li, W. Isolation and Quantification of L-Tryptophan from Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis Larvae as a Marker for the Quality Control of an Edible Insect Extract. Insects 2025, 16, 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090905

AMA Style

Yang HJ, Li W. Isolation and Quantification of L-Tryptophan from Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis Larvae as a Marker for the Quality Control of an Edible Insect Extract. Insects. 2025; 16(9):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Hye Jin, and Wei Li. 2025. "Isolation and Quantification of L-Tryptophan from Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis Larvae as a Marker for the Quality Control of an Edible Insect Extract" Insects 16, no. 9: 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090905

APA Style

Yang, H. J., & Li, W. (2025). Isolation and Quantification of L-Tryptophan from Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis Larvae as a Marker for the Quality Control of an Edible Insect Extract. Insects, 16(9), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop