Next Article in Journal
Multidimensional Profiling of Senescence in Eastern Honey Bee, Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Workers: Morphology, Microstructure, and Transcriptomics
Previous Article in Journal
Foraging Behaviors and Comparative Yield Effects of Bumblebee (Bombus terrestris Linnaeus) and Chinese Honeybee (Apis cerana cerana Fabricius) to Cherry (Prunus pseudocerasus ‘Hongdeng’) in Northern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Syntaxin-1A Silencing by RNAi Disrupts Growth and Reproduction in the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri

1
Engineering Research Center of Biocontrol, Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Agricultural Transboundary Pests of Yunnan Province, Agricultural Environment and Resource Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
3
Integrative Microbiology Research Centre, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(9), 901; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090901
Submission received: 2 August 2025 / Revised: 26 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Simple Summary

The Asian citrus psyllid, D. citri, is a major vector of the citrus greening pathogen. This study identified Syntaxin-1A (Syx1A) as a gene expressed throughout all developmental stages of D. citri, with particularly high expression in the salivary glands. RNAi-mediated silencing of Syx1A resulted in 58% mortality in nymphs and 73% in adults, reduced body mass, inhibited oviposition, and led to pronounced ovarian atrophy. These effects are attributed to impaired regulation of yolk proteins critical for oogenesis. Thus, targeted suppression of Syx1A offers a species-specific and environmentally sustainable approach for controlling D. citri and limiting the spread of citrus greening disease.

Abstract

Diaphorina citri is the primary global vector of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”, the bacterium responsible for Huanglongbing. Syntaxin-1A (Syx1A), a member of the Qa-SNARE family, is essential for vesicle fusion and signal transduction, though its function in hemipteran insects remains poorly understood. This study presents the first comprehensive analysis of Syx1A expression in D. citri. Transcripts were detected across all life stages, with peak expression in the salivary glands. RNAi silencing of Syx1A reduced mRNA levels by 39.0% in nymphs and 58.0% in adults, resulting in 58.3% nmortality in nymphs within 5 days and 73.3% in adults within seven days, along with significant weight loss. Treated females showed marked declines in fecundity, ovarian degeneration, and deficient yolk deposition. RT-qPCR confirmed significant downregulation of Vg1, VgA, and VgR. These findings establish Syx1A as a regulator of growth and reproduction in citrus psyllids via modulation of yolk synthesis. RNAi targeting of Syx1A represents a promising strategy for ecologically sound pest control and may contribute to efforts in halting the transmission of the Huanglongbing pathogen CLas.

1. Introduction

Huanglongbing (HLB), or citrus greening, is a phloem-restricted disease that threatens global citrus production. It is caused by the γ-proteobacterium “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” (CLas), which infects all commercial citrus cultivars [1,2]. First identified in Guangdong Province, China, in the early 20th century, HLB was later confirmed in São Paulo, Brazil (2004), and Florida, USA (2005) [1,2]. Since then, it has rapidly spread across the USA, Mexico, Brazil, Belize, Puerto Rico, and Cuba, resulting in billions of dollars in economic losses [3,4]. Under natural conditions, HLB is primarily transmitted via grafting with infected scions and through the vector insect, the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri). The rapid geographic expansion of D. citri throughout Asia and the Americas has significantly contributed to the widespread prevalence of HLB [2]. Currently, no effective method exists to fully eradicate HLB. The inability to detect CLas early and the rapid disease spread pose major challenges to control efforts [5]. Presently adopted management strategies include the use of disease-free seedlings, removal of infected trees, and suppression of the citrus psyllid vector [5]. Among these, D. citri control is considered one of the “three pillars” of integrated HLB management, alongside deploying pathogen-free nursery stock and eliminating infection reservoirs [6,7]. Chemical control remains the dominant approach for reducing D. citri populations, involving the extensive application of pyrethroid, organophosphate, neonicotinoid, and carbamate insecticides [8,9]. However, prolonged reliance on these pesticides has led to widespread resistance in psyllid populations [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In addition, frequent prophylactic applications pose ecological risks, including harm to non-target organisms and potential threats to human health [14]. These concerns underscore the urgent need for sustainable, alternative strategies to manage both D. citri and HLB.
RNA interference (RNAi) is a sequence-specific, post-transcriptional gene silencing mechanism that uses exogenous double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to degrade target messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in pest organisms [15]. This approach enables precise gene function validation and targeted gene suppression of harmful insect species. Its efficacy has been demonstrated across more than 20 economically significant pest species from diverse orders, including Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hemiptera [16,17,18,19]. The utilization of RNAi technology extends beyond laboratory research, with its commercial applications increasingly penetrating the market. Presently, the primary agricultural application of RNAi technology involves pest control via the expression of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in genetically modified plants. This approach, termed Host-Induced Gene Silencing (HIGS), has been effectively implemented in a variety of crops [20,21]. Furthermore, non-transgenic RNAi products, such as Spray-Induced Gene Silencing (SIGS), are emerging as a prominent area of research due to their cost-effectiveness and operational simplicity [22]. However, several factors limit RNAi efficiency: dsRNA stability, insect uptake rates, intracellular RNAi machinery, and systemic spread [23]. For instance, in Lepidoptera insects, such as Ostrinia nubilalis, achieving efficient RNAi is challenging due to the instability of dsRNA in the gut and hemolymph, leading to its rapid degradation by enzymatic activity and a consequent significant reduction in RNAi efficiency [24]. Delivery method is a key determinant of success—while microinjection is suitable for laboratory studies, feeding and spraying are more practical for field applications. Yet in these methods, dsRNA is vulnerable to rapid degradation by nucleases [25,26]. To address this, researchers have developed nanocarriers such as cationic liposomes, chitosan, dendrimers (PDIs), carbon quantum dots (CQDs), and star-shaped polycations (SPc), which enhance both dsRNA stability and cellular uptake [27,28,29,30,31]. In citrus psyllid management, RNAi has shown considerable potential. Recent studies have successfully suppressed target gene expression and significantly reduced psyllid populations via feeding and spray-based dsRNA delivery; the genes targeted in these studies include Wing Disc (WD), cathepsin D, chitin synthase, apoptosis inhibitor GS-K3, hexokinase, V-ATPase-E, and DcCP8, among others [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Due to its high specificity, RNAi enables targeted silencing of essential genes using exogenously applied dsRNA, offering a novel, environmentally responsible, and sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides. Consequently, identifying optimal gene targets and refining sequence design are critical next steps for maximizing RNAi efficacy.
SNARE proteins act as molecular engines driving membrane fusion, thereby regulating cellular secretion and endocytosis, as well as participating in critical biological processes such as neurotransmission, autophagy, and tumorigenesis [38,39,40]. Functional differentiation among SNAREs is dictated by the presence of glutamine (Q-SNARE) or arginine (R-SNARE) residues within their core domains, enabling accurate targeting of membrane fusion sites and integration into broader signaling networks [41,42,43]. In Drosophila melanogaster, over 20 SNARE family members have been identified [44,45]. Among them, the Qa-SNARE Syntaxin 1A (Syx1A), discovered in 1995, is recognized as a multifunctional regulator [46]. Syx1A forms a ternary complex with VAMP2 and SNAP-25, facilitating synaptic vesicle fusion and neurotransmitter release [47,48]. Beyond its neuronal role, Syx1A is involved in embryonic membrane formation, cuticle hardening, and yolk metabolism [46]. Recent studies have further implicated Syx1A in regulating the midgut epithelial integrity of locust nymphs via the insulin/mTOR nutrient-sensing pathway [49].
Current research on the Syn1A gene in insects, aside from Drosophila melanogaster and Locusta migratoria, remains notably limited. In Drosophila, Syn1A has been characterized as a multifunctional regulatory factor involved in various processes, such as synaptic vesicle fusion, neurotransmitter release, cell growth, and protein transport [46,48]. Similarly, in locusts, Syn1A affects feeding behavior, midgut nutrient absorption, and ovarian yolk deposition by modulating the insulin/mTOR pathway, thereby directly influencing reproductive capacity [49,50]. Although these studies offer valuable insights into the function of Syn1A in certain insects, the role and potential functions of this gene in a broader spectrum of insect species warrant further investigation. Addressing this gap, the present study focuses on Diaphorina citri as a model organism. A comprehensive spatiotemporal expression profile of Syx1A was first mapped across diverse tissues and developmental stages. Subsequently, RNA interference (RNAi) was employed to effectively silence Syx1A expression. Knockdown of Syx1A significantly reduced the survival and reproductive capacity of D. citri, underscoring its essential role in growth, development, and fecundity. These findings position Syx1A as a promising RNAi target for the strategic suppression of citrus psyllid populations through the disruption of key physiological processes. This study thus provides both a robust molecular framework and a viable, environmentally sustainable approach for the targeted control of vector insects responsible for citrus greening disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects Rearing and Sample Preparation

A D. citri colony was continuously maintained at the Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University (Guangzhou, China). Insects were reared on orange jasmine (Murraya exotica L.) inside Plexiglas cages (60 × 60 × 60 cm) in a glasshouse maintained at 26 ± 1 °C, 55–65% RH, and a 14 L:10 D photoperiod. To synchronize cohorts, ~100 adults (5–10 days post-eclosion) were allowed to oviposit on fresh M. exotica shoots for 24 h before removal. Eggs were left to hatch, and nymphs developed on the host plant. Target instars and adults were gently collected using a fine camel-hair brush and aspirator, then snap-frozen at −80 °C. Each experiment was conducted with three biological replicates per treatment.

2.2. Identification of Syx1A and Bioinformatic Analysis

The full-length Syx1A cDNA was obtained from our in-house transcriptome (unpublished). Specific primers (Table S2), designed using Primer Premier 5, were used to amplify the open reading frame. PCR was performed in 25 µL reactions using LA Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan), following the cycling parameters described by Guo et al. [51]. PCR products were gel-purified, cloned into the pClone007 Blunt vector (Tsingke, Beijing, China), and sequenced. The deduced amino acid sequence was analyzed in MEGA 7.0, and conserved domains were annotated using SMART (http://smart.embl.de accessed on 15 July 2025) across multiple insect taxa and Homo sapiens. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted in DNAMAN, and a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table S1.

2.3. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity and concentration were evaluated with a NanoDrop One Micro UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Shiga, Japan), following the provided instructions. The resulting cDNA was stored at −80 °C for downstream applications, including conventional PCR, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) synthesis.

2.4. RT-qPCR Analysis

Transcript quantification was performed using a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), following the protocol described by Kong et al. [52]. Primer sequences are listed in Table S2, with D. citri β-actin serving as the endogenous reference gene [8]. Each cDNA sample was diluted 1:10, and 2.5 µL was used in a 15 µL qRT-PCR reaction comprising 7.5 µL SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus, Takara, Shiga, Japan) and 0.3 µM of each primer. Reactions were run in triplicate using the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 55 °C for 30 s. Relative transcript levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. All assays included three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates.

2.5. Syx1A Expression Analysis of Different Developmental and Tissue

For each developmental stage, individuals were pooled per biological replicate as follows: 500 eggs, 300 first-instar, 150 second-instar, 75 third-instar, 40 fourth-instar, 20 fifth-instar nymphs, and 15 freshly emerged females plus 15 males. Three independent replicates were prepared for each stage. To analyze Syx1A expression, tissues were dissected from freshly emerged adults and fifth-instar nymphs under a stereomicroscope on ice in ice-cold 1× PBS. Adult tissues included midgut, salivary glands, hemolymph, testes, ovaries, bacteriome, antennae, legs, head, integument, fat body, and muscle. Nymphal tissues included the same, except with wing buds instead of reproductive organs. Each tissue pool consisted of 150 individuals, and three biological replicates were collected per tissue type. Samples were immediately placed in RNase-free 1.5 mL tubes containing 100 µL RNAiso Plus (Takara, Shiga, Japan), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

2.6. RNA Interference

To investigate the function of Syx1A in Diaphorina citri, RNA interference (RNAi) was employed. dsRNA templates were generated by PCR using gene-specific primers incorporating a 5′ T7 promoter sequence (5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3′). GFP dsRNA served as a negative control. Each 50 µL PCR reaction contained 25 µL of 2× EasyTaq® PCR SuperMix (+dye) (Sangon, Shanghai, China), 1 µL of cDNA, 2 µL of each 10 µM primer, and 20 µL of double-distilled water (ddH2O). PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplified products were transcribed into dsRNA using the T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. dsRNA concentration was determined with a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and integrity was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Primer sequences are listed in Table S2.

2.7. Effect of Syx1A on the Survival Rate and Body Weight of Asian Citrus Psyllid

This study examined the effects of Syx1A knockdown on body mass and mortality in Diaphorina citri nymphs and adults. Freshly molted fifth-instar nymphs (<12 h post-molt) and newly emerged adults (1–2 days post-eclosion) were microinjected with 500 ng µL−1 of dsSyx1A. Each treatment group comprised over 120 individuals. A negative control group received dsGFP. Following injection, viable individuals were transferred to tender shoots of M. exotica. Gene silencing efficiency was assessed 48 h post-injection. Total RNA was extracted from whole insects and reverse-transcribed for RT-qPCR analysis. Four biological replicates were performed, each consisting of ten nymphs or ten adults. Mortality was recorded daily for nymphs (days 1–4) and every other day for adults (days 1, 3, 5, 7). Body mass was measured on day 3 for nymphs and day 5 for adults.

2.8. Effect of on Syx1A Female Fecundity

To evaluate the effect of Syx1A knockdown on female fecundity, dsSyx1A-injected females were paired 1:1 with age-matched males on fresh M. exotica shoots to ensure normal mating and oviposition. dsRNA injections were performed as previously reported [53,54]. And drawing on these studies, along with our previous experimental data, we concluded that a dsRNA concentration of 500 ng/µL achieves optimal RNAi efficiency in D. citri for most target genes. Beginning on day 3 post-injection—when oviposition commenced—shoots were replaced every 48 h. Eggs laid on removed shoots were counted to quantify per-female fecundity through day 11, ensuring sustained RNAi activity throughout the reproductive window. For ovarian phenotyping, females from both treatment groups (dsSyx1A and dsGFP) were dissected two days after mating. Ovaries were excised in sterile 1× PBS under a stereomicroscope and examined for morphological differences. Three independent biological replicates were conducted.

2.9. Effect of Syx1A Silencing on the Expression of Vitellogenin and Its Receptor Genes

The experiments revealed that Syx1A suppression significantly impaired oviposition and ovarian development, implicating this gene in oogenesis. Since vitellogenin (Vg) and its receptor (VgR) are essential for insect reproduction, we assessed transcript levels of D. citri Vg1, VgA, and VgR to determine the impact of Syx1A knockdown. On day 3 post-injection, total RNA was extracted from adult females and analyzed via RT-qPCR as previously described. Primer sequences are listed in Table S2.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Expression patterns of Syx1A were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Tukey’s multiple range test was employed for pairwise comparisons. Independent-samples t-tests were used to analyze gene expression, body weight, and egg production, also with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. All experiments included a minimum of three biological replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Characterization and Phylogenetic Insights into Syx1A

From the Diaphorina citri transcriptome, we successfully cloned the full-length open reading frame of Syx1A, comprising 930 nucleotides. This sequence encodes a 309-amino-acid protein with a predicted molecular mass of 35.72 kDa and an isoelectric point of 5.104. The deduced protein features a canonical SynN domain (amino acids 38–162), a SNARE domain (204–271), and a transmembrane region (283–305), consistent with the typical domain architecture of insect Syx1A proteins (Figure 1B). Multiple sequence alignment revealed that the SNARE domain is highly conserved among insects, with 98–100% identity, while the full-length D. citri Syx1A shares 78.85% identity with orthologues from other species (Figure 1A). Phylogenetic analysis showed that Syx1A proteins from diverse insect orders form a monophyletic clade, with the D. citri sequence clustering closely with hemipteran homologues from Bemisia tabaci and Planococcus citri (Figure 1C).

3.2. Expression Profiles of Syx1A Across Developmental Stages and Tissues

To characterize Syx1A expression, RT-qPCR was performed across all developmental stages of D. citri, from eggs and 1st–5th instar nymphs to newly emerged adult males and females. Syx1A transcripts were detected at every stage, with the highest levels in 4th and 5th instar nymphs, followed by eggs and 3rd instar nymphs. No significant differences were observed between transcript levels in the 1st and 2nd instars and adults (Figure 2A and Figure S1A). Tissue-specific expression analyses were subsequently conducted on 5th instar nymphs and adults within five days post-eclosion. Syx1A expression displayed strong tissue specificity in both life stages. In nymphs, transcript abundance was highest in the salivary glands, followed by the mycetome and midgut, with low expression in the cuticle, antennae, wing buds, hemolymph, fat body, and feet (Figure 2C and Figure S1C). In adults, salivary glands again showed the highest expression, followed by the testes and midgut, while the cuticle, antennae, mycetome, ovaries, head, hemolymph, fat body, and feet exhibited moderate levels. Muscle tissues showed the lowest expression (Figure 2B and Figure S1C).

3.3. Evaluation of dsRNA-Mediated Silencing Efficiency of Exogenous Syx1A in Nymphs and Adults of Diaphorina citri

To assess gene silencing efficiency, newly molted 5th instar nymphs (<12 h post-molt) and synchronously emerged adults were microinjected with 500 ng µL−1 of dsSyx1A; dsGFP served as a negative control. RT-qPCR at 48 h post-injection confirmed a significant knockdown of Syx1A expression: 39.0 ± 2.8% reduction in nymphs (Figure 3A) and 58.0 ± 3.1% in adults (Figure 3B). These results demonstrate that dsRNA treatment effectively and consistently suppresses Syx1A expression in D. citri.

3.4. Effects of Syx1A Silencing on Body Weight and Survival of Diaphorina citri Nymphs and Adults

To investigate the functional role of Syx1A in D. citri development, RNAi experiments were conducted on 5th instar nymphs and newly emerged adults. Survival monitoring revealed significantly increased mortality in dsSyx1A-treated groups: nymph mortality reached 58.3% by day 5 compared to 13.3% in the dsGFP group (Figure 4B), while adult mortality rose to 73.3% by day 7, far exceeding the 16.6% observed in controls (Figure 4D). In parallel, body-weight measurements showed significantly reduced weights in both nymphs and adults following dsSyx1A treatment compared to controls (Figure 4A,D). Collectively, these findings underscore the essential role of Syx1A in the growth, development, and survival of D. citri.

3.5. Impact of Syx1A Silencing on Oviposition and Ovarian Development in Adult Diaphorina citri

Silencing of Syx1A via RNA interference (RNAi) significantly impaired female reproductive performance. Daily fecundity analysis revealed that, beginning on day 3, egg production in the dsSyx1A group consistently lagged behind that of the dsGFP controls, with statistically significant reductions observed at five consecutive time points (days 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11; Figure 5A). As a result, cumulative egg production over the 8-day monitoring period was markedly reduced (Figure 5B), indicating that Syx1A deficiency disrupts oocyte maturation and oviposition. Ovarian morphology supported this interpretation: by day 3, ovaries from dsGFP females contained ovarioles filled with mature, yellow-pigmented oocytes, consistent with normal vitellogenesis. In contrast, ovaries from dsSyx1A females were visibly smaller, exhibited diminished vitellin deposition, and harbored oocytes arrested at early to mid-developmental stages (Figure 5C). Collectively, these results establish that Syx1A is essential for vitellogenesis and ovarian development and is therefore critical for reproductive success in D. citri.

3.6. Influence of Syx1A Silencing on the Expression of Vg1, VgA, and VgR in Adult Diaphorina citri

To investigate the molecular basis underlying Syx1A-mediated reproductive regulation, we quantified key vitellogenic transcripts three days after dsRNA treatment. Compared to dsGFP controls, transcript levels of Vg1, VgA, and VgR were significantly reduced in dsSyx1A females (Figure 6A–C). This coordinated downregulation suggests that Syx1A acts upstream of both vitellogenin synthesis (Vg1/VgA) and receptor-mediated uptake (VgR). Thus, Syx1A silencing decreases vitellogenin availability and hinders its ovarian sequestration, leading to arrested oocyte maturation and reduced egg production. These findings demonstrate that Syx1A regulates female reproductive output in D. citri by modulating the expression of vitellogenic genes.

4. Discussion

In D. melanogaster, Syx1A has been characterized as a multifunctional regulator involved in synaptic vesicle fusion, neurotransmitter release, cell growth, and protein trafficking [46,48]. Similarly, in L. migratoria, Syx1A influences feeding behavior, midgut nutrient absorption, and ovarian yolk deposition through modulation of the insulin/mTOR pathway, directly impacting reproductive capacity [49,50]. Despite these insights, the expression dynamics, functional networks, and hormonal regulation of Syx1A across other insect species remain poorly understood, highlighting the need for broader comparative analyses.
This study is the first to isolate and clone the full-length cDNA of Syx1A from D. citri. Bioinformatic analysis revealed the presence of a SynN domain at the N-terminus and a canonical SNARE domain located proximally to the transmembrane region. Cross-species alignment of the SNARE motif showed high conservation within the insect class, suggesting strong evolutionary pressure to maintain its functional integrity [39,40,41,48]. All SNARE proteins harbor a conserved SNARE motif that adopts a parallel four-helix bundle structure; in synaptic SNARE complexes, SNAP-25 contributes two motifs, while Syntaxin and Synaptobrevin each contribute one, collectively forming a functional unit [55]. The conserved sequence and domain architecture of Syx1A across insects strongly support its role as a core component in membrane fusion machinery.
In L. migratoria, Syx1A is consistently expressed at high levels throughout all developmental stages [49,50], a pattern corroborated in this study for D. citri, suggesting that Syx1A is critical across the hemipteran life cycle. In Drosophila, Syx1A is essential for salivary gland vesicle dynamics during the pupal stage, ensuring proper glandular function [56]. Notably, although Syx1A mRNA levels are low in larval salivary glands, the protein localizes abundantly to the apical membrane of late-stage larvae [57], indicating high protein stability and recycling post-exocytosis via endocytosis and late endosome fusion. In D. citri, Syx1A is ubiquitously expressed across all examined tissues but is particularly elevated in the salivary glands of both nymphs and adults. This expression pattern contrasts with that of Drosophila and may reflect the continuous requirement for effector protein secretion by the salivary glands to suppress plant defense responses and enable sustained phloem feeding. The high transcript abundance of Syx1A likely meets the increased demand for vesicle trafficking and membrane fusion involved in this process [58,59,60]. Thus, the pronounced expression of Syx1A in D. citri salivary glands may represent an adaptive evolutionary strategy aligned with its herbivorous, phloem-feeding lifestyle.
RNA interference (RNAi) has been extensively validated as a functional genomics tool in hemipteran insects, with microinjection recognized as the most reliable method for delivering double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) due to its precise dosage control and high systemic diffusion efficiency [36,37,49,61]. The Diaphorina citri genome contains all core components of the RNAi machinery, and previous studies have demonstrated successful gene silencing using RNAi-based approaches [32]. In this study, dsRNA targeting Syx1A (dsSyx1A) was microinjected into fifth-instar nymphs and newly emerged adults. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis confirmed that Syx1A expression was reduced by 39.0% and 58.0% in nymphs and adults, respectively. These results confirm that dsRNA delivery via microinjection effectively induces stable and efficient gene silencing in D. citri, thereby establishing a technical foundation for investigating the functional role of Syx1A in the insect’s development and reproduction.
Intestinal epithelial cells facilitate digestion by secreting hydrolytic enzymes such as trypsin, carboxypeptidase, and aminopeptidase [62]. Disruption of midgut protease gene function impairs digestive efficiency and nutrient absorption [63]. In Locusta migratoria, microinjection of dsRNA targeting LmSyx1A led to complete mortality in fifth-instar nymphs, accompanied by significant reductions in food intake and body weight [49]. Histological analyses revealed damage to the brush border and disrupted columnar epithelial structure, highlighting the essential role of Syx1A in maintaining midgut integrity [49]. Building on these findings, the present study demonstrates that Syx1A silencing in D. citri significantly reduces body weight in both nymphs and adults, with mortality rates of 58.3% and 73.3%, respectively. These outcomes suggest that Syx1A is critical for nutrient assimilation and growth, providing direct evidence for its utility as a target in RNAi-based pest control strategies.
The involvement of syntaxin proteins in reproduction has been demonstrated in multiple arthropods. For instance, SNAP-25 is essential for reproduction in the tick Amblyomma maculatum [64], while Syx1A regulates ovarian development and reproductive output in both D. melanogaster and L. migratoria [46,50]. Given the high evolutionary conservation of Syx1A, its role in reproduction is likely conserved across insect species. Consistent with this, Syx1A silencing in D. citri significantly reduced egg production. Ovarian dissections revealed impaired yolk deposition in the dsSyx1A-injected group, whereas ovaries in the control group developed normally. These findings indicate that Syx1A is essential for female sexual maturation, likely by facilitating yolk accumulation within developing oocytes.
Vitellogenin (Vg), the precursor of yolk proteins, is synthesized primarily in the fat body and serves as a key marker of reproductive capacity in insects [65]. In locusts, Syx1A is highly expressed in the fat body, and its knockdown significantly reduces Vg transcript levels, implicating Syx1A in nutrient storage and energy metabolism related to reproduction [49,50]. A comparable expression pattern was observed in D. citri, where silencing Syx1A in the fat body led to the downregulation of Vg1, VgA, and their receptor VgR. Previous studies have shown that silencing Vg1/VgA/VgR compromises reproductive output in D. citri [66,67]. Based on these observations, we propose that Syx1A regulates reproductive function by modulating Vg synthesis in the fat body and Vg uptake in the ovaries—an evolutionarily conserved mechanism among hemipteran insects.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that Syx1A plays a pivotal role in the growth, development, and reproduction of D. citri. RNAi-mediated silencing of Syx1A impairs weight gain, increases mortality, and disrupts reproductive processes by downregulating Vg1/VgA/VgR expression, thereby inhibiting yolk synthesis and uptake. These findings establish Syx1A as a promising molecular target for RNAi-based pest management strategies aimed at suppressing D. citri populations and limiting the spread of Huanglongbing. This work lays the groundwork for the development of sustainable, gene-targeted control methods against this critical citrus pest.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16090901/s1. Table S1: Species and GenBank accession numbers of amino acid sequences used for conducting phylogenetic tree; Table S2: Primer sequences used for RNAi and RT-qRCR in this study; Figure S1: Expression of Syx1A at different developmental stages and tissues of Diaphorina citri using RT-qPCR; Figure S2: The heatmap visualizes the developmental stage and tissue specific expression profile of the Syx1A gene in Diaphorina citri; Figure S3. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of Syx1A genes of Diaphorina citri.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.; Data curation, D.D.; Formal analysis, D.D.; Funding acquisition, C.C. and C.G.; Investigation, D.D., X.W. and B.Q.; Methodology, D.D.; Resources, C.C. and C.G.; Software, D.D.; Supervision, C.C.; Validation, D.D., X.W. and B.Q.; Visualization, X.W. and B.Q.; Writing—original draft, D.D.; Writing—review and editing, C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2025A1515011029 and 2022A1515110401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32402352), and the Open Competition Program of Top Ten Critical Priorities of Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation for the 14th Five-Year Plan of Guangdong Province (2023SDZG06). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or in the Supplementary Materials. All scripts used for data processing, statistical modeling, and figure generation are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We extend our profound gratitude to Bao-Li Qiu and Li-He Zhang of Chongqing Normal University for their invaluable support. Additionally, we express our appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, N.; Trivedi, P. Citrus Huanglongbing: A Newly Relevant Disease Presents Unprecedented Challenges. Phytopathology 2013, 103, 652–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bove, J.M. Huanglongbing: A destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 88, 7–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Graham, J.H.; Bassanezi, R.B.; Dawson, W.O.; Dantzler, R. Management of Huanglongbing of Citrus: Lessons from São Paulo and Florida. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2024, 62, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hall, D.G.; Richardson, M.L.; Ammar, E.D.; Halbert, S.E. Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2013, 146, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, X.; Ruan, H.; Zhou, C.; Meng, X.; Chen, W. Controlling Citrus Huanglongbing: Green Sustainable Development Route Is the Future. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 760481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pérez-Hedo, M.; Hoddle, M.S.; Alferez, F.; Tena, A.; Wade, T.; Chakravarty, S.; Wang, N.; Stelinski, L.L.; Urbaneja, A. Huanglongbing (HLB) and its vectors: Recent research advances and future challenges. Entomol. Gen. 2025, 45, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grafton-Cardwell, E.E.; Stelinski, L.L.; Stansly, P.A. Biology and Management of Asian Citrus Psyllid, Vector of the Huanglongbing Pathogens. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 413–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tiwari, S.; Pelz-Stelinski, K.; Stelinski, L.L. Effect of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection on susceptibility of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, to selected insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alquézar, B.; Carmona, L.; Bennici, S.; Miranda, M.P.; Bassanezi, R.B.; Peña, L. Cultural Management of Huanglongbing: Current Status and Ongoing Research. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tiwari, S.; Mann, R.S.; Rogers, M.E.; Stelinski, L.L. Insecticide resistance in field populations of Asian citrus psyllid in Florida. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, X.D.; Neupane, S.; Gossett, H.; Pelz-Stelinski, K.S.; Stelinski, L.L. Insecticide rotation scheme restores insecticide susceptibility in thiamethoxam-resistant field populations of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae), in Florida. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, X.D.; Stelinski, L.L. Resistance Management for Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, in Florida. Insects 2017, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Yuan, C.; Gao, Y.; Fan, J.; Yuan, G.; Wang, J.; Dou, W. Genetic mutations and insecticide resistance in Diaphorina citri: A comparative study across Chinese citrus regions. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025, 81, 4831–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lopez, S.B.G.; Guimarães-Ribeiro, V.; Rodriguez, J.V.G.; Dorand, F.A.P.S.; Salles, T.S.; Sá-Guimarães, T.E.; Alvarenga, E.S.L.; Melo, A.C.A.; Almeida, R.V.; Moreira, M.F. RNAi-based bioinsecticide for Aedes mosquito control. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, N.; Christiaens, O.; Liu, J.; Niu, J.; Cappelle, K.; Caccia, S.; Huvenne, H.; Smagghe, G. Delivery of dsRNA for RNAi in insects: An overview and future directions. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kebede, M.; Fite, T. RNA interference (RNAi) applications to the management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Its current trends and future prospects. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 944774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gamez, S.; Srivastav, S.; Akbari, O.S.; Lau, N.C. Diverse Defenses: A Perspective Comparing Dipteran Piwi-piRNA Pathways. Cells. 2020, 9, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haller, S.; Widmer, F.; Siegfried, B.D.; Zhuo, X.; Romeis, J. Responses of two ladybird beetle species (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to dietary RNAi. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2652–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schvartzman, C.; Fresia, P.; Murchio, S.; Mujica, M.V.; Dalla-Rizza, M. RNAi in Piezodorus guildinii (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): Transcriptome Assembly for the Development of Pest Control Strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 804839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, S.; Jaouannet, M.; Dempsey, D.M.A.; Imani, J.; Coustau, C.; Kogel, K.-H. RNA-based technologies for insect control in plant production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 39, 107463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, W.; Yin, X.; An, S. Application progress of plant-mediated RNAi in pest control. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 963026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cagliari, D.; Dias, N.P.; Galdeano, D.M.; dos Santos, E.Á.; Smagghe, G.; Zotti, M.J. Management of Pest Insects and Plant Diseases by Non-Transformative RNAi. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cooper, A.M.; Silver, K.; Zhang, J.; Park, Y.; Zhu, K.Y. Molecular mechanisms influencing efficiency of RNA interference in insects. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cooper, A.M.W.; Yu, Z.; Biondi, M.; Song, H.; Silver, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, K.Y. Stability of double-stranded RNA in gut contents and hemolymph of Ostrinia nubilalis larvae. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 169, 104672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhu, K.Y.; Palli, S.R. Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges of Insect RNA Interference. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Suzuki, T.; Nunes, M.A.; España, M.U.; Namin, H.H.; Jin, P.; Bensoussan, N.; Zhurov, V.; Rahman, T.; De Clercq, R.; Hilson, P.; et al. RNAi-based reverse genetics in the chelicerate model Tetranychus urticae: A comparative analysis of five methods for gene silencing. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Arjunan, N.; Thiruvengadam, V.; Sushil, S.N. Nanoparticle-mediated dsRNA delivery for precision insect pest control: A comprehensive review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2024, 51, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kolge, H.; Kadam, K.; Ghormade, V. Chitosan nanocarriers mediated dsRNA delivery in gene silencing for Helicoverpa armigera biocontrol. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 189, 105292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yan, S.; Ren, B.; Shen, J. Nanoparticle-mediated double-stranded RNA delivery system: A promising approach for sustainable pest management. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ma, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Chao, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, M.; Shen, J.; Yan, S. Visualization of the process of a nanocarrier-mediated gene delivery: Stabilization, endocytosis and endosomal escape of genes for intracellular spreading. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, Z.; Xia, T.; Zhang, C.; He, Q.; Zhong, H.; Fu, S.; Yuan, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; et al. Characterization of an RR-2 cuticle protein DcCP8 and its potential application based on SPc nanoparticle-wrapped dsRNA in Diaphorina citri. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 6262–6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Shesheny, I.; Hajeri, S.; El-Hawary, I.; Gowda, S.; Killiny, N. Silencing Abnormal Wing Disc Gene of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Disrupts Adult Wing Development and Increases Nymph Mortality. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Galdeano, D.M.; Breton, M.C.; Spotti Lopes, J.R.; Falk, B.W.; Machado, M.A. Oral delivery of double-stranded RNAs induces mortality in nymphs and adults of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pacheco, I.d.S.; Galdeano, D.M.; Maluta, N.K.P.; Lopes, J.R.S.; Machado, M.A. Gene silencing of Diaphorina citri candidate effectors promotes changes in feeding behaviors. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, J.; Lu, Z.; Yu, H. Silencing of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Significantly Inhibits Chitin and Fatty Acid Metabolism in Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, C.; Qiu, J.; Hu, Y.; Xu, P.; Deng, Y.; Tian, L.; Wei, Y.; Sang, W.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, B. Silencing of V-ATPase-E gene causes midgut apoptosis of Diaphorina citri and affects its acquisition of Huanglongbing pathogen. Insect Sci. 2023, 30, 1022–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, S.; Zou, Z.; Xin, T.; Cai, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhong, L.; Xia, B. Knockdown of hexokinase in Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae) by RNAi inhibits chitin synthesis and leads to abnormal phenotypes. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 4303–4313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. D’Agostino, M.; Risselada, H.J.; Lürick, A.; Ungermann, C.; Mayer, A. A tethering complex drives the terminal stage of SNARE-dependent membrane fusion. Nature 2017, 551, 634–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hernandez, J.M.; Stein, A.; Behrmann, E.; Riedel, D.; Cypionka, A.; Farsi, Z.; Walla, P.J.; Raunser, S.; Jahn, R. Membrane Fusion Intermediates via Directional and Full Assembly of the SNARE Complex. Science 2012, 336, 1581–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.; Dang, R.; Zhang, W.; Hong, J.; Li, X. SNARE proteins: Core engines of membrane fusion in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2024, 189148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lobingier, B.T.; Merz, A.J. Sec1/Munc18 protein Vps33 binds to SNARE domains and the quaternary SNARE complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23, 4611–4622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fang, Q.A.-O.; Zhao, Y.; Herbst, A.D.; Kim, B.N.; Lindau, M. Positively charged amino acids at the SNAP-25 C terminus determine fusion rates, fusion pore properties, and energetics of tight SNARE complex zippering. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 3230–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fujimoto, M.; Ebine, K.; Nishimura, K.; Tsutsumi, N.; Ueda, T. Longin R-SNARE is retrieved from the plasma membrane by ANTH domain-containing proteins in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 25150–25158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, J.; Mizrak, A.; Lee, C.-W.; Cicconet, M.; Lai, Z.W.; Tang, W.; Lu, C.; Mohr, S.E.; Farese, R.V.; Walther, T.C. Identification of two pathways mediating protein targeting from ER to lipid droplets. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022, 24, 1364–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Surpin, M.; Zheng, H.; Morita, M.T.; Saito, C.; Avila, E.; Blakeslee, J.J.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Kovaleva, V.; Carter, D.; Murphy, A.; et al. The VTI Family of SNARE Proteins Is Necessary for Plant Viability and Mediates Different Protein Transport Pathways. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2885–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schulze, K.L.; Broadie, K.; Perin, M.S.; Bellen, H.J. Genetic and electrophysiological studies of drosophila syntaxin-1A demonstrate its role in nonneuronal secretion and neurotransmission. Cell 1995, 80, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Irfan, M.; Gopaul, K.R.; Miry, O.; Hökfelt, T.; Stanton, P.K.; Bark, C. SNAP-25 isoforms differentially regulate synaptic transmission and long-term synaptic plasticity at central synapses. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Megighian, A.; Zordan, M.; Pantano, S.; Scorzeto, M.; Rigoni, M.; Zanini, D.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C. Evidence for a radial SNARE super-complex mediating neurotransmitter release at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 3134–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J. Targeting Syntaxin 1A via RNA interference inhibits feeding and midgut development in Locusta migratoria. Insect Sci. 2025, 32, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Q.; He, J.; Ma, C.; Yu, D.; Kang, L. Syntaxin 1A modulates the sexual maturity rate and progeny egg size related to phase changes in locusts. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, C.; Pan, H.; Zhang, L.; Ou, D.; Lu, Z.; Khan, M.M.; Qiu, B. Comprehensive Assessment of Candidate Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies Using RT-qPCR in Tamarixia radiata, a Predominant Parasitoid of Diaphorina citri. Genes 2020, 11, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kong, W.; Lv, X.; Ran, X.; Mukangango, M.; Eric Derrick, B.; Qiu, B.; Guo, C. Comprehensive Assessment of Reference Gene Expression within the Whitefly Dialeurodes citri Using RT-qPCR. Genes 2024, 15, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, J.; Fu, S.; Chen, S.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, H. Vestigial mediates the effect of insulin signaling pathway on wing-morph switching in planthoppers. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, L.; Feng, Q.; Wang, S.; Ghafar, M.A.; Cheng, H.; Zhou, C.; Wang, L. miR-278-3p targets ATG16L1 to modulate autophagy and suppresses CLas proliferation in Diaphorina citri. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 308, 142441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sutton, R.B.; Fasshauer, D.; Jahn, R.; Brunger, A.T. Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 1998, 395, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Farkaš, R.; Beňová-Liszeková, D.; Mentelová, L.; Mahmood, S.; Ďatková, Z.; Beňo, M.; Pečeňová, L.; Raška, O.; Šmigová, J.; Chase, B.A.; et al. Vacuole dynamics in the salivary glands of Drosophila melanogaster during prepupal development. Dev. Growth Differ. 2015, 57, 74–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peng, Y.; Yang, W.; Lin, W.; Lai, T.; Chien, C. Nak regulates Dlg basal localization in Drosophila salivary gland cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 382, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kuang, Y.; Shangguan, C.; Wang, C.; Gao, L.; Yu, X. Salivary effector DcE1 suppresses plant defense and facilitates the successful feeding of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025, 81, 1717–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, S.; Ran, X.; Huang, Y.; Sang, W.; Derrick, B.E.; Qiu, B. Transcriptomic response of citrus psyllid salivary glands to the infection of citrus Huanglongbing pathogen. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2024, 114, 210–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wu, Z.; Qu, M.; Chen, M.; Lin, J. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of saliva and salivary glands from the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. J. Proteom. 2021, 238, 104136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhuo, J.; Xue, J.; Lu, J.; Huang, H.; Xu, H.; Zhang, C. Effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown of NlTOR gene on fertility of male Nilaparvata lugens. J. Insect Physiol. 2017, 98, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zha, X.; Wang, H.; Sun, W.; Zhang, H.; Wen, J.; Huang, X.; Lu, C.; Shen, Y. Characteristics of the Peritrophic Matrix of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori and Factors Influencing Its Formation. Insects 2021, 12, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Isoe, J.; Rascón, A.A.; Kunz, S.; Miesfeld, R.L. Molecular genetic analysis of midgut serine proteases in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Browning, R.; Karim, S. RNA interference-mediated depletion of N-ethylmaleimide Sensitive Fusion Protein and Synaptosomal Associated Protein of 25 kDa results in the inhibition of blood feeding of the Gulf Coast tick, Amblyomma maculatum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2013, 22, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Parthasarathy, R.; Palli, S.R. Molecular analysis of nutritional and hormonal regulation of female reproduction in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, H.; Mo, J.; Wang, X.; Pan, B.; Xu, S.; Li, S.; Zheng, X.; Lu, W. IPS (In-Plant System) Delivery of Double-Stranded Vitellogenin and Vitellogenin receptor via Hydroponics for Pest Control in Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nian, X.; Luo, Y.; He, X.; Wu, S.; Li, J.; Wang, D.; Holford, P.; Beattie, G.A.C.; Cen, Y.; Zhang, S.; et al. Infection with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ improves the fecundity of Diaphorina citri aiding its proliferation: A win-win strategy. Mol. Ecol. 2024, 33, e17214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis of Syx1A in Diaphorina citri. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of Syx1A proteins from different species, including Diaphorina citri (Dc), Nilaparvata lugens (Nl), Aedes albopictu (Ab), Drosophila melanogaster (Dm), Manduca sexta (Ms), Apis mellifera (Am), and Nasonia vitripennis (Nv). Color-coded sequence identity is displayed as follows: perfect matches (100%) in blue, strong similarity (≥75%) in red, moderate similarity (≥50%) in green, and weak similarity (≥30%) in yellow. (B) Structural domain analysis of the Syx1A protein. (C) Phylogenetic analysis of Syx1A proteins across different insect species and Homo sapiens using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0. Syx1A protein sequences from the various insect species examined, together with their GenBank accession numbers, are provided in Table S1. Syx1A is marked with red triangles.
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis of Syx1A in Diaphorina citri. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of Syx1A proteins from different species, including Diaphorina citri (Dc), Nilaparvata lugens (Nl), Aedes albopictu (Ab), Drosophila melanogaster (Dm), Manduca sexta (Ms), Apis mellifera (Am), and Nasonia vitripennis (Nv). Color-coded sequence identity is displayed as follows: perfect matches (100%) in blue, strong similarity (≥75%) in red, moderate similarity (≥50%) in green, and weak similarity (≥30%) in yellow. (B) Structural domain analysis of the Syx1A protein. (C) Phylogenetic analysis of Syx1A proteins across different insect species and Homo sapiens using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0. Syx1A protein sequences from the various insect species examined, together with their GenBank accession numbers, are provided in Table S1. Syx1A is marked with red triangles.
Insects 16 00901 g001
Figure 2. Expression profiles of Syx1A in different life stages of Diaphorina citri and in various tissues of adults and nymphs. (A) Temporal expression of Syx1A across developmental stages. (B) Tissue-specific expression of Syx1A in adult females and males. (C) Tissue-specific expression of Syx1A in fifth-instar nymphs. Relative expression levels were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method. The expression profile of Syx1A is displayed as a heat map (main Figure 2) and a bar chart (Figure S1); color intensity corresponds to expression level, as indicated by the scale bar. All quantitative analyses were performed in SPSS and are presented as mean ± SE. Based on three biological replicates (each with three technical replicates), one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was applied; different letters denote statistically significant differences among developmental stages (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Expression profiles of Syx1A in different life stages of Diaphorina citri and in various tissues of adults and nymphs. (A) Temporal expression of Syx1A across developmental stages. (B) Tissue-specific expression of Syx1A in adult females and males. (C) Tissue-specific expression of Syx1A in fifth-instar nymphs. Relative expression levels were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method. The expression profile of Syx1A is displayed as a heat map (main Figure 2) and a bar chart (Figure S1); color intensity corresponds to expression level, as indicated by the scale bar. All quantitative analyses were performed in SPSS and are presented as mean ± SE. Based on three biological replicates (each with three technical replicates), one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was applied; different letters denote statistically significant differences among developmental stages (p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00901 g002
Figure 3. RNAi efficiency of dsSyx1A in Asian citrus psyllid nymphs (A) and adults (B). Nymphs and adults were separately injected with dsSyx1A or the control dsGFP, and samples were collected 48 h later. Relative expression levels were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method. Data are expressed as mean ± SE from three biological replicates; inter-group differences were analyzed with an independent-samples t-test. Different letters denote significant differences between the treatment and control groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. RNAi efficiency of dsSyx1A in Asian citrus psyllid nymphs (A) and adults (B). Nymphs and adults were separately injected with dsSyx1A or the control dsGFP, and samples were collected 48 h later. Relative expression levels were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method. Data are expressed as mean ± SE from three biological replicates; inter-group differences were analyzed with an independent-samples t-test. Different letters denote significant differences between the treatment and control groups (p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00901 g003
Figure 4. Impact of Syx1A RNAi on the body weight and mortality of Diaphorina citri. (A,B) show weight and mortality in 5th-instar nymphs following Syx1A knockdown, whereas panels (C,D) present the corresponding data for adults. Values are mean ± SE; different letters denote significant differences between treatment and control groups (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Impact of Syx1A RNAi on the body weight and mortality of Diaphorina citri. (A,B) show weight and mortality in 5th-instar nymphs following Syx1A knockdown, whereas panels (C,D) present the corresponding data for adults. Values are mean ± SE; different letters denote significant differences between treatment and control groups (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00901 g004
Figure 5. Impact of Syx1A silencing on reproduction and ovarian development in Diaphorina citri. (A) Daily fecundity per female following Syx1A silencing. (B) Cumulative 8-day fecundity per female after Syx1A silencing. (C) Morphological effects of Syx1A knockdown on ovary development in adult females. Values are mean ± SE; different letters denote significant differences between treatment and control groups (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Impact of Syx1A silencing on reproduction and ovarian development in Diaphorina citri. (A) Daily fecundity per female following Syx1A silencing. (B) Cumulative 8-day fecundity per female after Syx1A silencing. (C) Morphological effects of Syx1A knockdown on ovary development in adult females. Values are mean ± SE; different letters denote significant differences between treatment and control groups (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00901 g005
Figure 6. Effects of Syx1A RNAi on the expression of Vg1, VgA, and VgR in the adult Diaphorina citri. (A) Vg1, (B) VgA, and (C) VgR transcriptional response to Syx1A knockdown. The 2−∆∆Ct method was adopted to calculate the relative expression level. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Different letters denote significant differences between treatment and control groups (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effects of Syx1A RNAi on the expression of Vg1, VgA, and VgR in the adult Diaphorina citri. (A) Vg1, (B) VgA, and (C) VgR transcriptional response to Syx1A knockdown. The 2−∆∆Ct method was adopted to calculate the relative expression level. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Different letters denote significant differences between treatment and control groups (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00901 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, D.; Wang, X.; Qiu, B.; Chang, C.; Guo, C. Syntaxin-1A Silencing by RNAi Disrupts Growth and Reproduction in the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Insects 2025, 16, 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090901

AMA Style

Dong D, Wang X, Qiu B, Chang C, Guo C. Syntaxin-1A Silencing by RNAi Disrupts Growth and Reproduction in the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Insects. 2025; 16(9):901. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090901

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Dingming, Xingmin Wang, Baoli Qiu, Changqing Chang, and Changfei Guo. 2025. "Syntaxin-1A Silencing by RNAi Disrupts Growth and Reproduction in the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri" Insects 16, no. 9: 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090901

APA Style

Dong, D., Wang, X., Qiu, B., Chang, C., & Guo, C. (2025). Syntaxin-1A Silencing by RNAi Disrupts Growth and Reproduction in the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Insects, 16(9), 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090901

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop