Next Article in Journal
Evolutionary Dynamics of Glycoside Hydrolase Family 1 Provide Insights into Insect–Plant Interactions in Lepidoptera
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Trehalase on the Gene Expression of the Reproductive Regulation Pathway Network and Triglyceride Metabolism in Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Six Brassica napus Cultivars on the Life Table Parameters of the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

1
College of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northwestern the Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2025, 16(7), 726; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070726
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Revised: 7 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 17 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Physiology, Reproduction and Development)

Simple Summary

Oilseed rape, Brassica napus L., is the third-largest oil crop in the world, and it is susceptible to being infected by different pests, especially aphids. However, only a few studies have reported the effects of rapeseed cultivars on the life table of Myzus persicae. In this study, the life history parameters of M. persicae in six B. napus cultivars were analyzed by using an age-stage, two-sex life table. The results showed that the population parameters of M. persicae are higher in three cultivars (Xinong 18, Aiyouku 999, and Aiganyou 558) and lower in Mianxinyou 78 and Zhongshuang 11 compared to Zhongyou 821. This study concluded that B. napus cultivars affect the developmental duration, survival rate, and fecundity of M. persicae and provide information for choosing a suitable rapeseed cultivar.

Abstract

The contents of glucosinolates and erucic acid clearly vary in Brassica napus seeds, but a few studies still focus on the effects of B. napus cultivars on the life table parameters of Myzus persicae. In this study, the life history parameters of M. persicae in six B. napus cultivars were examined at 25 ± 1 °C, 50 ± 10% RH, and a photoperiod of 14 h of light/10 h of dark under laboratory conditions. The results showed that significant differences exist in the life table parameters of M. persicae in six B. napus cultivars. The female fecundity, net reproductive rate, intrinsic rate of increase, finite rate of increase, and total longevity of M. persicae were higher in Xinong 18, Aiganyou 558, and Aiyouku 999. However, the intrinsic rate of increase in M. persicae was significantly lower in Zhongshuang 11 (rm = 0.28 ± 0.006) and Mianxinyou 78 (rm = 0.23 ± 0.007), suggesting the host-induced suppression of M. persicae population growth. Among all the cultivars mentioned above, Zhongshuang 11 and Mianxinyou 78 were recommended for planting for decreasing M. persicae population numbers. Additionally, more attention should be paid to Xinong 18, Aiyouku 999, and Aiganyou 558 to control M. persicae populations, and we conclude that Brassica napus cultivars affect the developmental duration and the population dynamics of M. persicae.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Brassica napus L., which is a Brassicaceae plant, is the third-largest oil crop in the world according to the FAO data in 2024. The planting area and average yield of oilseed rape has increased in China over the years [1]. Oilseed rape comprises three main varieties: B. campestris, B. napus, and B. juncea, and B. napus is the main cultivated species in China due to its exuberant nutritional growth, adaptability, and high yield [2]. However, oilseed rape is infected by different pests, and aphids are identified as the most serious pests affecting oilseed rape in China [1,3,4]. Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were the main aphid species [5]. Myzus persicae is a polyphagous pest that damages many economical plants, and its host range includes over 400 plant species [6]. Myzus persicae can seriously damage plants through feeding on plant phloem, excreting honeydew, and transmitting plant pathogenic viruses [7,8,9]. The management of M. persicae predominantly relies on chemical insecticides. However, the widespread use of insecticides has led to the high resistance of M. persicae and negative effects on biodiversity [10]. Consequently, screening aphid-resistant plant cultivars is a viable long-term integrated pest management strategy [11].
Numerous studies indicate that the glucosinolates in plants play an important role in plant–insect interactions [12,13]. The high-glucosinolate content in Brassicaceae leaves has been identified as unsuitable for the growth and reproduction of insects, such as Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) [14]. The seeds of B. napus have different erucic acid and glucosinolates contents [15,16,17]. China’s national standard verifies that B. napus seeds, with an erucic acid content of less than 5% and a glucosinolate content of less than 45 µmol/g in each rapeseed cake, are considered low erucic acid and low glucosinolate content in the B. napus variety as food oil [18]. China’s national standard verifies that B. napus seeds with an erucic acid content higher than 43% are considered a high-erucic acid variety [19]. Rapeseed oil has high content of erucic acid, which is not easily digested or absorbed by the human body [20,21]. However, high-erucic acid rapeseed is the most important source for producing industrial erucic acid, which is widely used in the field of chemistry [15]. Therefore, in Brassica napus seeds, scientists are working to enhance the erucic acid content of seeds to serve industrial materials, while reducing the erucic acid content of seeds to ensure the food oil safety of that produced by rapeseed [20]. However, the impact of B. napus cultivars in that their seeds have different glucosinolate contents on the population dynamics of M. persicae is still underreported under indoor conditions.
The host plant quality can directly affect the fecundity of herbivorous insects [20]. Population life tables are essential for research on arthropod population ecology, pest management, and host plant resistance [11,22,23]. The age-stage, two-sex life table theory integrates both sexes and various developmental stages of insects, thus providing more detailed population parameters [24,25,26]. And, the age-stage, two-sex life table theory can be used in thelytoky insects, such as Myzus persicae [11,24]. This study conducted a comparative analysis of the effects of different B. napus cultivars on the survival, developmental duration, and reproduction of M. persicae using age-stage, two-sex life tables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects and Plants Cultures

The origin colony of M. persicae was reared in the Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province, China. The Myzus persicae population was maintained on B. napus seedlings in a plastic pot (15 cm diameter) in a 30 × 30 × 30 cm cage, and then housed in an artificial climate incubator (Zhejiang Tupu Yunnong Science and Technology Co., Hangzhou, China), where the climate condition was 25 ± 1 °C, with a photoperiod of 14 L: 10 D and relative humidity of 50 ± 10%. A new and clean 35-day-old B. napus plant was added to the insect cage every week. The oldest plants were removed from the cage according to the plant’s condition. The Myzus persicae population was adapted on each rapeseed cultivar over two generations before the experiments.
Six B. napus cultivars were used in this experiment, and all of them were purchased from a market (Table 1). The high-erucic acid and high-glucosinolate cultivar Zhongyou 821 (ZY821) was used as a control, and the low-erucic acid and low-glucosinolate cultivars were Zhongshuang 11 (ZS11), Mianxingyou 78 (MXY78), Aiganyou 558 (AGY558), Xinong 18 (XN18), and Aiyouku 999 (AYK999). Plastic pots (15 cm diameter × 7 cm height) were used to cultivate the plants using commercial nutrient soil with an organic matter content above 35% and a neutral pH value (Xinluyuan Seedling Substrate Co., Ltd. Liaocheng, China). All plants were grown in an air-conditioned room with a photoperiod of 14 L:10 D, at 25 ± 3 °C, and a relative humidity of 50 ± 10%. All healthy B. napus plants with two to five true leaves were used in the subsequent test (about 35 d).

2.2. Life Table Study of M. persicae

Thirty-five-millimeter Petri dishes with 0.01 g/L agar medium were prepared. Brassica napus leaves were cut and placed adaxial side up on each Petri dish. Ten M. persicae adults were put on the backs of the leaves to lay new brown nymphs. After the emergence of new nymphs, at least 30 individuals were selected, and each was maintained in a separate Petri dish separately. The developmental duration, survival number, number of nymphs, and longevity of each individual was recorded every 24 h until death, and a Petri dish with fresh leaves and new agar medium was replaced every two days to ensure food quality and clean environmental conditions during the period. All test individuals were maintained in an artificial climate incubator as previously described. The life tables of M. persicae in different B. napus cultivars were completed from March to July in 2023. There were 64, 47, 68, 67, 63, and 62 replications in the ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78 cultivars, respectively.

2.3. Data Analysis

All raw data of M. persicae were analyzed by using the TWOSEX-MSChart program and based on the theory of the age-stage, two-sex life table [25,26,27]. The mean value and standard error of each parameter were analyzed using the bootstrap method with 100,000 repetitions, and a paired-bootstrap test was adopted to compare the significance of each parameter (p < 0.05) [28,29,30]. All figures were drawn using Sigmaplot 12.5.
In all the data, x means age and j means the stage of M. persicae; i indicates age and y means the stage of M. persicae in the theory condition to calculate life expectancy. The age-stage specific survival rate (sxj), the age-stage specific fecundity (fxj), the age-specific survival rate (lx), the cohort age-specific fecundity (mx) and the age-specific maternity (lxmx) were calculated. The following formula was used:
m x = m j = 1 m s x j   f x j / j = 1 m s x j
The population parameters were also calculated, including the intrinsic rate of increase (r), the finite rate of increase (λ), the net reproductive rate (R0), the mean generation time (T), the mean female fecundity (F), and doubling time (DT) [24]. For age-stage specific life expectancy (exj),  S i y  is the probability that an individual of age x and stage j would survive to age i and stage y, assuming that  S i y  = 1 [24]. The age-stage reproductive value (vxj) is defined as the contribution of individuals at age x and stage j to the future population [31]. Finally, the relative fitness (Rf) was calculated: Rf > 1 shows that the net reproductive rate of the treated groups increased, while Rf < 1 shows that the fitness costs of the control groups increased [32]. The parameters were calculated as follows:
x = 0 e r ( x + 1 ) l x m x = 1
λ = er
R 0 = x = 0 l x m x
F = x = 1 N f E x N f
T = (lnR0)/r
DT = (In2)/r
e x j = i = x n y = j m S i y
v x j = e r ( x + 1 ) S x j i = x e r ( i + 1 ) y = j m S i y f i y
Rf = R0 value of the treatment groups/R0 value of the control groups.

3. Results

3.1. Survival Rate of M. persicae on Six B. napus Cultivars

The age-stage specific survival rates (Sxj) of M. persicae from birth to death can be found in six B. napus cultivars in Figure 1. M. persicae, from first nymphs to adults, was divided into first nymphs, second nymphs, third nymphs, fourth nymphs, and adults. The M. persicae were reproduced via parthenogenesis in this study, so we just showed female data. The curves of different instar stages of M. persicae overlapped, which was caused by the varied growth rates of M. persicae individuals. We found that the survival rate of M. persicae at the adult stage was relatively high, although the data from M. persicae in MXY78 decreased in the second half of life, but the survival time was longer (Figure 1F).

3.2. Developmental Duration of M. persicae on Six B. napus Cultivars

The developmental duration of each stage, female longevity, and the total longevity of M. persicae were significantly different on the six B. napus cultivars (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The developmental duration of M. persicae was significantly shorter in XN18 and AYK999 compared to the other four B. napus cultivars. Cultivar ZS11 delayed the preadult duration by 1.33 days compared to Cultivar AYK999 (p < 0.05). Cultivar AYK999 (20.30 days) survived for a longer time of 4.47 days compared to Cultivar ZS11. Furthermore, the average total longevity of M. persicae changed from 21.7 days to 24.81 days when feeding on all B. napus species.

3.3. The Population Survival Rate and Fecundity of M. persicae in Six B. napus Cultivars

There were significant variations in the population survival rate and fecundity of M. persicae in the six B. napus cultivars (Figure 2). The population survival rate continuously decreased. An initial increase followed by a decrease in the female fecundity and age-specific reproduction of M. persicae occured in six B. napus cultivars. Because M. persicae are thelytoky insects, the female fecundity and population fecundity partly overlapped in M. persicae, since it has thelytoky reproduction (Figure 2). The age-specific fecundity (mx) had peak values at D9, D8, D9, D11, D8, and D9 on the ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AYG558, AYK999, and MXY78 Cultivars, respectively. The highest mx values were at 4.07, 3.75, 6.03, 5.97, 5.98, and 1.96 on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AYG558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively (Figure 2).

3.4. The Population Parameters of M. persicae in Six B. napus Cultivars

The population parameters of M. persicae showed significant differences in the six B. napus cultivars (Table 3). The parameters of M. persicae in AYK999 were higher than those observed in those feeding on five other B. napus cultivars. The mean generation time of M. persicae was shorter at 10.47 days in AYK999, and it produced a 1.19-fold delay in MXY78 comapred to that in AYK999. The intrinsic rate of increase (0.40), net reproductive rate (63.43), the finite rate of increase (1.49), and Rf value (1.60) were the largest, and the double time (1.75) was the lowest in AYK999. Oppositely, the parameters of M. persicae in MXY78 were relatively lower, and the double time (3.04) of M. persicae in MXY78 was the longest.
Since the intrinsic rate of increase can accurately and comprehensively reflect the data on insect population growth, reproduction, and survival rate, it is used as an indicator to compare population growth and an important parameter to identify breed resistance. Considering all parameters, MXY78 had the lowest r value, indicating that the MXY78 variety is the most resistant to aphids. The r value of AYK999 was the highest, so it was the least resistant to M. persicae.

3.5. Life Expectancy of M. persicae in Six B. napus Cultivars

The life expectancy of M. persicae in six B. napus cultivars was the greatest at age 0. The highest exj values at age 0 for M. persicae feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78 were 23.70, 21.77, 24.40, 23.61, 24.81, and 22.11 days, respectively (Figure 3). Then, the life expectancy of M. persicae at each stage gradually decreased with the prolonged aphid lifespan.

3.6. Reproductive Value of M. persicae in Six B. napus Cultivars

The reproductive value of M. persicae at each stage was gradually increased and finally declined as the lifespan increased in the six B. napus cultivars (Figure 4). The female adult stage of M. persicae had the maximum contribution in all populations numbers.

3.7. Principal Component Analysis of Different Brassica napus Seeds and Developmental Duration and Fecundity of Other M. persicae in Six B. napus Cultivars

The erucic acid and glucosinolate content in six B. napus seeds and the M. persicae individual and population indexes in six B. napus seedlings were analyzed via PCA (Figure 5). PCA revealed that the data could be divided into two principal components (PCs): the first PC accounted for 76.29% and the second PC accounted for 19.75% of the variation. The cultivars (AYK999, AGY558, and XN18) were clusterd, and MXY78 and ZS11 were clearly separated from ZY821 and other plant cultivars (Figure 5A).
Meanwhile, the doubling time, preadult duration, and mean generation time showed a strong negative correlation. Conversely, the total longevity, intrinsic rates of increase, finite rates of increase, adult female longevity, fecundity, and net reproductive rate exhibited a strong positive correlation (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

Brassica napus is one of the most important crops in China. However, the occurrence of pests and diseases has increased in B. napus fields [1]. In the study, M. persicae showed higher fecundity and intrinsic rates of increase on three double-low B. napus cultivars (XN18, AGY558, and AYK999) compared to the double-high B. napus cultivar ZY821. In contrast, a weaker fecundity and lower intrinsic rate of increase were observed in ZS11 and MXY78. Different B. napus cultivars significantly affected the population parameters of M. persicae. These results were consistent with a previous report. Li et al. (2023) have reported that B. napus varieties can have high or low resistance to aphids [33].
The host plants can affect the survival rate, developmental duration, and fecundity of many insects [11,14,34]. Glucosinolates are vital in secondary metabolites, found in cruciferous crops, and have defensive functions in plant–insect interactions [33]. When plant tissue is damaged, such as by a chewing insect or through mechanical injury, the intact glucosinolates stored in the vacuole come into contact with the enzyme myrosinase, leading to the production of isothiocyanate, nitrile, and oxazolidinethione [10,11]. Glucosinolates are favored by the chewing–feeding insects Lepidoptera for feeding and oviposition, but do not contribute to expanding phloem-feeding insects [13,35]. Evidence showed that the glucosinolate levels of different Arabidopsis genotypes affect host plant suitability and insect performance for generalist and specialist herbivores, and that the number of aphids was negatively related to the constitutive glucosinolate content of the plant [36]. The generalist aphid M. persicae and specialist aphid B. brassicae infested the plants and significantly increased the glucosinolate levels in Arabidopsis. However, direct evidence regarding how the glucosinolate content of plants affects the growth and development of aphids remains relatively scarce [37].
The seeds of B. napus have different glucosinolate contents [13]. Can different B. napus cultivars with seeds have different glucosinolate contents and affect aphid resistance? One previous article discovered the relationship between bird damage and the glucosinolate content of seeds in B. napus, where the bird damage increased in B. napus plants with a glucosinolate content of lower than 23 µmol/g in the seed stage [37]. Li (2006) suggests that increasing the glucosinolate content in B. napus leaves could enhance the resistance of the plant to disease and pests [38]. The aphid resistance of rapeseed in our results was consistent with the point of Mewis et al. [35]. Nonetheless, it is essential to acknowledge that various factors like host plant species, nitrogen contents, temperature, water, and soil conditions influence insect population dynamics in the field [39,40,41]. Therefore, further field trials are needed to comprehensively compare aphid resistance among different B. napus cultivars.
Our current study in laboratory conditions lays the groundwork for more advanced research to assess practical applications in real and complex field environments. Under field conditions, multiple trophic interactions and the attack sequence of insects can significantly influence plant–aphid interactions. In the agricultural ecosystem, growing different B. napus cultivars can naturally suppress M. persicae populations, reducing reliance on chemical pesticides. Integrating cultivar selection into pest management strategies can achieve sustainable crop protection while supporting ecological balance, and promote the development of organic farming [42].

5. Conclusions

This study found that six B. napus cultivars affected the population of M. persicae based on the age-stage, two-sex life table method. Cultivars ZS11 and MXY78 were the least suitable hosts, as evidenced by the lowest net reproductive rate and highest mean generation time. So, two B. napus cultivars (ZS11 and MXY78) were unfavorable for raising the M. persicae numbers. Three B. napus cultivars (XN18, AGY558, and AYK999) in the seed stage with a low glucosinolate content posed a higher risk of increasing the M. persicae population. Due to the erucic acid content and glucosinolate content of seeds varying in B. napus, choosing the suitable rapeseed cultivar is important for pest management, and we should to pay more attention to the pest management strategies of double-low rapeseed cultivars in agriculture ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.; Methodology, M.T. and S.-Z.Z.; Formal analysis, M.T., L.-K.L. and F.Z.; Visualization, M.T.; Writing—Original Draft, M.T., L.-K.L. and F.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.T. and L.-K.L.; Investigation, M.T., L.-K.L. and F.Z.; Resources, S.-Z.Z.; Methodology, S.-Z.Z.; Supervision, S.-Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Doctor Foundation of Southwest University of Science and Technology [grant numbers: 22zx7143]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers: 32302440]; the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, China [grant numbers: 2024NSFSC1319]; and the Talent Foundation of Southwest University of Science and Technology [grant numbers: 3510000218].

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to some colleagues at the College of Life Science and Agri-forestry for helping to finish the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yang, Q.P.; Liu, W.C.; Huang, C. Statistics and analysis of oilseed rape losses caused by main diseases and insect pests in recent 10 years. Plant Prot. 2018, 44, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu, X.M.; Chen, B.Y.; Lu, G.Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z. Descriptors and Data Standard for Rapeseed (Brassca spp.); China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2007; pp. 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zheng, X.; Koopmann, B.; Ulber, B.; von Tiedemann, A. A global survey on diseases and pests in oilseed rape—Current challenges and innovative strategies of control. Front. Agron. 2020, 2, 590908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hausmann, J.; Heimbach, U.; Gabriel, D.; Brandes, M. Effects of regional crop rotations on autumn insect pests in winter oilseed rape. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 2371–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hao, Z.P.; Zhan, H.X.; Gao, L.L.; Huang, F.; Zhu, L.N.; Hou, S.M. Possible effects of leaf tissue characteristics of oilseed rape Brassica napus on probing and feeding behaviors of cabbage aphids Brevicoryne brassicae. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2020, 14, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bass, C.; Puinean, M.; Zimmer, C.T.; Denholm, I.; Field, L.M.; Foster, S.P.; Williamson, M.S. The evolution of insecticide resistance in the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 353, 1677–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stará, F.; Horská, T.; Zuskováb, E.; Kocourek, F. Pyrethroid and carbamate resistance in Czech populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) from oilseed rape. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 2342–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bera, S.; Arena, G.D.; Ray, S.; Flannigan, S.; Casteel, C.L. The potyviral protein 6K1 reduces plant proteases activity during Turnip mosaic virus infection. Viruses 2022, 14, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Basu, S.; Clark, R.E.; Bera, S.; Casteel, C.L.; Crowder, D.W. Responses of pea plants to multiple antagonists are mediated by order of attack and phytohormone crosstalk. Mol. Ecol. 2021, 30, 4939–4948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kirkland, L.S.; Babineau, M.; Ward, S.E.; Van Rooyen, A.R.; Chirgwin, E.; Mata, L.; Umina, P.A. Assessing the risk of resistance to flonicamid and afidopyropen in green peach aphid (Hemiptera: Myzus persicae) via in-vivo selection. Crop Prot. 2024, 184, 106783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, K.X.; Lin, C.Y.; Liu, H.P.; Haq, I.U.; Quandahor, P.; Gou, Y.P.; Liu, C.Z. Drought reduced the adaptability of Myzus persicae on drought-tolerant potato cultivars. Entomol. Gen. 2024, 44, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hopkins, R.J.; van Dam, N.M.; van Loon, J.J.A. Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009, 54, 57–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, C.Z.; Lou, Y.G. Insect-Plant Interactions; Science Publishing Press: Beijing, China, 2023; pp. 433–454. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaleel, W.; Saeed, S.; Saeed, Q.; Naqqash, M.N.; Sial, M.U.; Aine, Q.U.; Lu, L. Effects of three different cultivars of cruciferous plants on the age-stage, two-sex life table traits of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Entomol. Res. 2019, 49, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, N.; Tang, T.Z.; Fan, Q.X.; Meng, D.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, T. Breeding and application of Mianyou series of high-erucic acid rapeseed varieties. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2017, 18, 2049–2052. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tian, E.T.; Liang, H.L.; Wang, J.J.; Guo, J.; Cao, H.; Lin, S. Variation and correlation of erucic acid, oleic acid and glucosinolate contents in Brassica rapa seeds. Guizhou Agric. Sci. 2017, 45, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, T.Y.; Yu, K.J.; Wang, W.; Ye, B.T.; Khattak, A.N.; Yang, R.Q.; Tian, E.T. Variation and correlation analysis of erucic acid and glucoside content in Germplasm Groups of Brassica napus. Seed 2020, 39, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  18. NY/T 1795-2009; Grades and Specifications of Double Low Rapeseed. Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2009.
  19. NY/T 1990-2011; High Erucic acid Rapeseed. Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2011.
  20. Wang, P.D.; Xiong, X.J.; Zhang, X.B.; Wu, G.; Liu, F. A review of erucic acid production in Brassicaceae oilseeds: Progress and prospects for the genetic engineering of high and low-erucic acid rapeseeds (Brassica napus). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 899076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Galanty, A.; Grudzinska, M.; Pazdziora, W.; Paśko, P. Erucic acid–both sides of the story: A concise review on its beneficial and toxic properties. Molecules 2023, 28, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Awmack, C.S.; Leather, S.R. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 817–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chi, H.; You, M.S.; Smith, C.L.; Kavousi, A.; Özgökçe, M.S.; Güncan, A.; Gökçe, A. Age-stage two-sex life table: An introduction to theory, data analysis, and application. Entomol. Gen. 2020, 40, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chi, H.; Su, H.Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull Inst Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rate among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chi, H. TWOSEX-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis. Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fujian, China, 2024. Available online: https://www.faas.cn/cms/sitemanage/index.shtml?siteId=810640925913080000 (accessed on 24 December 2024).
  28. Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap; Chapman & Hall Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang, Y.B.; Chi, H. Life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): With an invalidation of the jackknife technique. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, J.Y.; Chen, Y.T.; Fu, J.W.; Shi, M.Z.; Chi, H.; You, M.S. Application of the bootstrap technique and the multinomial theorem in the research of age-stage, two-sex life table. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2022, 65, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tuan, S.J.; Lee, C.C.; Chi, H. Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 805–813, Erratum in Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1936. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ullah, F.; Gul, H.; Tariq, K.; Desneux, N.; Gao, X.; Song, D. Acetamiprid resistance and fitness costs of melon aphid, Aphis gossypii: An age-stage, two-sex life table study. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 171, 104729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, Y.H.; Cai, L.; Ding, T.; Tian, E.; Yan, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular basis of Brassica napus in response to aphid stress. Plants 2023, 12, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ali, M.Y.; Naseem, T.; Arshad, M.; Ashraf, I.; Rizwan, M.; Tahir, M.; Liu, T.X. Host-plant variations affect the biotic potential, survival, and population projection of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects 2021, 12, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mewis, I.; Appel, H.M.; Hom, A.; Raina, R.; Schultz, J.C. Major signaling pathways modulate arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 1149–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, W.J.; Liu, L.; Zhu, B.F.; Wang, C.Z.; Wang, H.X.; Ma, Y.X.; Wang, S.S. Effects of glucosinolates on the growth, survival and protective enzymes of pea aphid (Acythosiphon pisum). Acta Agrestia Sin. 2021, 29, 1675–1681. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, Y.G.; Jiang, M.X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Lu, G.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, X. Bird damage and glucosinolates of canola (Brassica napus L.). Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2016, 38, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, P.W. Glucosinolate and Their Relationship Between Leaves and Seeds in Brassica napus. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ahmed, N.; Darshanee, H.L.C.D.; Khan, I.A.; Zhang, Z.F.; Liu, T.X. Host selection behavior of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, in response to volatile organic compounds and nitrogen contents of cabbage cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ahmed, N.; Darshanee, H.L.C.; Fu, W.Y.; Hu, X.S.; Fan, Y.; Liu, T.X. Resistance of seven cabbage cultivars to green peach aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Casteel, C.L.; De Alwis, M.; Bak, A.; Dong, H.; Whitham, S.A.; Jander, G. Disruption of ethylene responses by Turnip mosaic virus mediates suppression of plant defense against the green peach aphid vector. Plant Physiol. 2015, 69, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Parizad, S.; Bera, S. The effect of organic farming on water reusability, sustainable ecosystem, and food toxicity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 71665–71676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The age-stage survival rate of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars. (AF) The survival rate of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively. N1, N2, N3, N4, and females represent the first–fourth instar nymphs and female stage of M. persicae.
Figure 1. The age-stage survival rate of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars. (AF) The survival rate of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively. N1, N2, N3, N4, and females represent the first–fourth instar nymphs and female stage of M. persicae.
Insects 16 00726 g001
Figure 2. Population survival rate and fecundity of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars. lx represents population survival rate; fx5 represents female fecundity; mx represents population fecundity; and lxmx represents population maternity. (AF) Population survival rate and fecundity of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively.
Figure 2. Population survival rate and fecundity of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars. lx represents population survival rate; fx5 represents female fecundity; mx represents population fecundity; and lxmx represents population maternity. (AF) Population survival rate and fecundity of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively.
Insects 16 00726 g002
Figure 3. Life expectancy of M. persicae in each developmental stage feeding on different B. napus cultivars. (AF) The life expectancy of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively. N1, N2, N3, N4, and female represent first–fourth instar nymphs and female stages of M. persicae.
Figure 3. Life expectancy of M. persicae in each developmental stage feeding on different B. napus cultivars. (AF) The life expectancy of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively. N1, N2, N3, N4, and female represent first–fourth instar nymphs and female stages of M. persicae.
Insects 16 00726 g003
Figure 4. Reproductive value of M. persicae in each developmental stage feeding on different B. napus cultivars. (AF) The reproductive value of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively. N1, N2, N3, N4, and female represent first–fourth instar nymphs and female stages of M. persicae.
Figure 4. Reproductive value of M. persicae in each developmental stage feeding on different B. napus cultivars. (AF) The reproductive value of M. persicae after feeding on ZY821, ZS11, XN18, AGY558, AYK999, and MXY78, respectively. N1, N2, N3, N4, and female represent first–fourth instar nymphs and female stages of M. persicae.
Insects 16 00726 g004
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) for different B. napus cultivars based on two substance contents in Brassica napus seeds and nine M. persicae population indexes. (A) PC scores of six rapeseed cultivars. (B) Loading plot was each index of M. persicae and erucic acid and glucosinolate content in six B. napus seeds. The factors included erucic acid: erucic acid content (%), glucosinolate: glucosinolate (µmol/g/rapeseed cake), doubling time, preadult duration (d), mean generation time (d), total longevity (d), intrinsic rates of increase (d), finite rates of increase (d), adult female longevity (d), fecundity (d), and net reproductive rate.
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) for different B. napus cultivars based on two substance contents in Brassica napus seeds and nine M. persicae population indexes. (A) PC scores of six rapeseed cultivars. (B) Loading plot was each index of M. persicae and erucic acid and glucosinolate content in six B. napus seeds. The factors included erucic acid: erucic acid content (%), glucosinolate: glucosinolate (µmol/g/rapeseed cake), doubling time, preadult duration (d), mean generation time (d), total longevity (d), intrinsic rates of increase (d), finite rates of increase (d), adult female longevity (d), fecundity (d), and net reproductive rate.
Insects 16 00726 g005
Table 1. Information of erucic acid, glucosinolate, and oil content in different B. napus seeds on commercial package.
Table 1. Information of erucic acid, glucosinolate, and oil content in different B. napus seeds on commercial package.
Cultivar
Name
Abbreviation NameErucic Acid Content (%)Oil Content (%)Glucosinolate (µmol/g/
Rapeseed Cake)
‘Zhongyou 821’ZY82145.45%_113.5
‘Zhongshuang 11’ZS11049.04%18.84
‘Xinong 18’XN18041.20%23.19
‘Aiganyou 558’AGY5580.2%49.23%21.07
‘Aiyouku 999’AYK9991.08%41.04%28.04
‘Mianxingyou 78’MXY780.4%46.18%20.31
Note: All erucic acid, glucosinolate, and oil contents in B. napus seeds from the commercial package. The part information (ZS11, MXY78, XN18, and AYK999) also can be found on website (http://www.zys.moa.gov.cn/, accessed on 7 July 2025), but the information of ZY821 and Aiganyou 558 cultivar cannot be found on this website.
Table 2. Developmental duration and longevity of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars.
Table 2. Developmental duration and longevity of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars.
Duration (d)ZY821ZS11 XN18AGY558AYK999MXY78
1st-instar duration/d1.66 ± 0.08 bc2.36 ± 0.12 a1.38 ± 0.06 d1.86 ± 0.08 b1.57 ± 0.07 c1.72 ± 0.06 bc
2nd-instar duration/d1.33 ± 0.06 ab1.41 ± 0.08 ab1.35 ± 0.06 ab1.30 ± 0.06 bc1.15 ± 0.05 c1.52 ± 0.08 a
3rd-instar duration/d1.60 ± 0.07 a1.45 ± 0.08 ab1.43 ± 0.06 ab1.60 ± 0.07 a1.32 ± 0.07 b1.59 ± 0.08 a
4th-instar duration/d1.37 ± 0.06 cd1.75 ± 0.11 ab1.52 ± 0.07 bc1.32 ± 0.06 d1.58 ± 0.06 b1.88 ± 0.07 a
Preadult duration/d5.95 ± 0.10 b6.95 ± 0.13 a5.66 ± 0.06 c6.11 ± 0.08 b5.63 ± 0.87 c6.71 ± 0.13 a
Adult female longevity/d18.10 ± 0.59 bc15.93 ± 0.47 d19.55 ± 0.86 ab19.16 ± 0.82 ab20.30 ± 0.06 a16.76 ± 0.68 cd
Total longevity/d23.72 ± 0.67 ab21.70 ± 0.79 b24.40 ± 0.95 a23.61 ± 1.04 ab24.81 ± 1.04 a22.11 ± 0.96 ab
Note: Data are represented as mean ± SE and analyzed using TWOSEX-MSChart program. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, considering the paired-bootstrap test.
Table 3. Populational parameters of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars.
Table 3. Populational parameters of M. persicae feeding on different B. napus cultivars.
ParametersZY821ZS11XN18AGY558 AYK999MXY78
Intrinsic rates of increase (r)/d−10.34 ± 0.005 c0.28 ± 0.006 d0.39 ± 0.006 ab0.37 ± 0.007 b0.40 ± 0.006 a0.23 ± 0.007 e
Finite rates of increase (λ)/d−11.40 ± 0.008 c1.33 ± 0.008 d1.47 ± 0.009 ab1.45 ± 0.010 b1.49 ± 0.008 a1.26 ± 0.008 e
Net reproductive rate (R0)39.69 ± 1.83 b29.04 ± 1.67 c62.16 ± 3.14 a63.19 ± 3.57 a63.43 ± 2.99 a17.19 ± 1.33 d
Mean generation time/d10.92 ± 0.17 bc11.97 ± 0.20 a10.71 ± 0.15 cd11.22 ± 0.14 b10.47 ± 0.13 d12.47 ± 0.25 a
Fecundity40.32 ± 1.74 b31.02 ± 1.33 c65.03 ± 2.80 a68.29 ± 3.04 a66.60 ± 2.52 a18.38 ± 1.28 d
Doubling time (DT)2.062.461.801.881.753.04
Relative fitness (Rf)10.731.571.591.600.43
Note: Data are mean ± SE and analyzed using TWOSEX-MSChart program. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, considering the paired-bootstrap test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, M.; Li, L.-K.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, S.-Z. The Effects of Six Brassica napus Cultivars on the Life Table Parameters of the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects 2025, 16, 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070726

AMA Style

Tian M, Li L-K, Zhu F, Zhang S-Z. The Effects of Six Brassica napus Cultivars on the Life Table Parameters of the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects. 2025; 16(7):726. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Mi, Lin-Kui Li, Feng Zhu, and Shi-Ze Zhang. 2025. "The Effects of Six Brassica napus Cultivars on the Life Table Parameters of the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)" Insects 16, no. 7: 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070726

APA Style

Tian, M., Li, L.-K., Zhu, F., & Zhang, S.-Z. (2025). The Effects of Six Brassica napus Cultivars on the Life Table Parameters of the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects, 16(7), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop