Next Article in Journal
Development of a New Trapping System with Potential Implementation as a Tool for Mosquito-Borne Arbovirus Surveillance
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Differentiation Reconfiguration in the Midgut of Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Based on Transcriptomics: Multilayer Enrichment Analysis and Topological Network Interpretation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation Is Effective Against Drosophila suzukii in Sweet Cherry

1
Chinese Academy of Quality and Inspection & Testing, Institute of Equipment Technology, Beijing 100123, China
2
Technology Innovation Center of Animal and Plant Product Quality, Safety and Control, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100123, China
3
Chengdu Customs District, Chengdu 610041, China
4
College of Environmental and Life Science, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Perth 6150, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(6), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060635
Submission received: 16 May 2025 / Revised: 6 June 2025 / Accepted: 10 June 2025 / Published: 17 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Simple Summary

Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera, Drosophilidae), a destructive invasive pest, poses a threat to global soft fruit production. This study evaluates low-temperature (3 °C) phosphine (PH3) fumigation as an eco-friendly alternative to chemical insecticides for controlling D. suzukii larvae in cherries. Results demonstrate high efficacy across all life stages of the pest in three cherry varieties, while maintaining fruit quality and shelf-life parameters. The treatment minimizes environmental impact and pesticide residues, addressing quarantine requirements and postharvest management challenges. By validating PH3 fumigation as a sustainable phytosanitary solution, this research advances practical, scalable pest control strategies for soft fruit industries, aligning with global demands for food safety and ecological preservation.

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii, classified as a quarantine pest in some countries, poses a serious threat to global trade due to its ability to damage berries and cherries. Recent studies indicate that low-temperature phosphine (PH3) fumigation effectively controls this pest without compromising fresh produce quality. However, the specific protocol for managing D. suzukii larvae in cherries using this method remains underexplored. This study evaluates the efficacy of low-temperature PH3 fumigation in controlling D. suzukii larvae across three cherry varieties at 3 °C and investigates potential effects on key quality metrics. Tolerance assessments revealed that 3rd instar larvae exhibit the highest resistance to PH3 among all developmental stages. A concentration of 800 mL/m3 PH3 for 84 h at 3 °C achieved phytosanitary efficacy for 0.99997 with no negative effect on the quality attributes of the tested cherry varieties. These results support low-temperature PH3 fumigation as a viable postharvest treatment for D. suzukii management in sweet cherries.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Sweet cherry (Prunus avium (L.) Moench) belongs to the Rosaceae, plants of the genus Prunus, cherry. Native to the region bordering the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea in Eurasia, it has been cultivated for centuries [1,2]. Research indicates it was introduced to Europe from Turkey and later introduced to North America by immigrants. Cherries are prized by consumers for their sweet flavor, attractive appearance, and nutritional value, including anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, and vitamin C [3]. Global cherry production has grown steadily in recent decades, reaching 4.594 million tons in 2021 and 4.687 million tons in 2022. With approximately 266,700 hectares (ha) of cherry orchards nationwide—including 233,300 ha dedicated to sweet cherries—China now leads the world in sweet cherry cultivation area (https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/ (accessed on 1 Augest 2019)). Major production regions include Shandong Province and areas along the Longhai Railway. However, this fruit species is highly susceptible to pest infestations, particularly by Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (spotted wing drosophila, SWD), a quarantine pest classified under the Drosophilidae family (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha). This invasive fly poses a significant threat to cherry production in multiple countries, including the United States (USA), Canada, and European nations [4,5]. Therefore, phytosanitary treatment under quarantine conditions is required prior to export.
D. suzukii is native to Southeast and East Asia but has emerged as a destructive invasive pest in the USA and Europe [6,7]. Unlike most Drosophila, D. suzukii females possess serrated, rigid ovipositors that enable egg-laying directly into the epidermis of ripe, fresh fruit [8]. Larvae feeding within the fruit pulp induces softening, browning, and rotting, ultimately causing premature fruit drop and substantial yield losses [9,10]. Controlling D. suzukii is challenging due to its rapid reproduction, broad host range, and ability to infest a wide variety of thin-skinned, juicy fruits [11]. Over the past few years, researchers have explored different postharvest treatments for D. suzukii. Irradiation with a dose of 40 gray (Gy) can prevent 1st and 2nd instar larvae from developing into adults, while a dose of 80 Gy is necessary to prevent late pupae from emerging as adults that would produce the F1 generation of larvae [12]. Kim et al. (2016) further suggested that a higher dose of 150 Gy could induce adult infertility, aiding in the control of the spread of D. suzukii [13]. Chemical treatments, such as fumigation with ethyl formate at specific concentrations and temperatures, have also shown promise in controlling egg-stage D. suzukii without compromising blueberry quality [7]. Additionally, Yang et al. (2018) reported successful control of D. suzukii eggs and larvae using nitric oxide (NO) fumigation at different concentrations and temperatures [14]. Despite these advancements, the application of these methods often comes with drawbacks, including high costs, concerns over food safety, and potential negative impacts on fruit quality. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop alternative treatment strategies that are both effective and safe.
Phosphine (PH3) has served as the primary fumigant for protecting stored bulk grains globally for decades, with its significance amplified in key applications following the phasing out of methyl bromide—a compound classified as ozone-depleting under the Montreal Protocol [15]. In recent years, the application of phosphine in different pest controls was conducted for exploration. Numerous reports show that PH3 fumigation at low temperature effectively controls various insect pests, such as the Bactrocera tau (at 5 °C) [16], Bactrocera correcta (at 5 °C) [17], Frankliniella occidentalis (at 3 °C; 5 °C) [18,19], and Bactrocera dorsalis (at 8 °C) [20]. But to also explore the effect of phosphine fumigation on fresh food quality, research has shown that low-temperature phosphine fumigation has no obvious phytotoxicity to lettuce (at 2 °C) [21], broccoli, asparagus, strawberry (at 2 °C) [22], white chrysanthemum (at 2 °C) [23], and the oriental lily (at 5 °C) [19]. However, adapting this methodology to control D. suzukii larvae in cherries requires careful consideration of various factors, including temperature, exposure time, and dose rates. Moreover, the effectiveness of this method against different stages of D. suzukii larvae and its potential impact on cherry quality need thorough investigation.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of low-temperature phosphine fumigation in controlling D. suzukii larvae at 3 °C in cherries, while also investigating its impact on cherry quality parameters. By conducting detailed experiments, we seek to identify an optimal fumigation schedule suitable for cherry exports. The insights gained from this study will contribute to the development of more effective and sustainable pest management strategies for cherry production, thereby fostering the development of specialized trade and ensuring the sustainability of agricultural endeavors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect, Fumigant, and Fruit

Insect: A D. suzukii colony was obtained from the Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. This colony was originally collected from cherry, grape, and other fruit orchards of Shandong Province in 2022. Additionally, a wild population was collected for regular (<12 months) rejuvenation. D. suzukii were cultured on artificial diets. This culturing was performed under controlled laboratory conditions at 26 ± 2 °C with 75–85% relative humidity and a 12:12 h light–dark cycle at the Laboratory of Phytosanitary Treatment and Equipment, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine.
Fumigant: The ammonia-free PH3 gas was generated by reacting aluminum phosphide tablets (Nippon Kasei Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a water solution, as previously described by Zou et al. (2024) [15].
Fruit: Cherry (country of origin: Shandong province) were purchased from the fruit market.

2.2. Developmental Duration Test

One hundred cherries were soaked in sterile water, washed, dried, and stored under laboratory conditions for 24 h to maintain temperature equilibrium. Then, they were put into the insect cage for natural infection for 12 h at room temperature, followed by incubation. From Day 1 (D1) to Day 11 (D11) after egg collection, ten cherries were dissected every 24 h to observe the developmental stages of D. suzukii. The experiment was conducted in three independent replicates.

2.3. Tolerance Comparison Test

Thirty cherry fruits were kept in D. suzukii rearing cages for 12 h. Each group of 6 fruits was subjected to rearing conditions for varying durations—12 h, 36 h, 60 h, 84 h, and 132 h—to obtain the various developmental stages of D. suzukii. The cherries were then placed in a 6 L fumigation chamber that had been chilled to 3 °C for 24 h beforehand. Subsequently, cherries infected with different developmental stages of D. suzukii were exposed to 100 mL/m3 of PH3 for 4 h at 3 °C.
Modified 6 L glass desiccators were utilized for the fumigation procedure. Each desiccators contained 6 infested cherries, with each fruit bearing 24–26 eggs (loading rate: roughly 0.8%). Desiccators were pre-equilibrated to 3 °C in an environmentally controlled chamber (KBF720, WTC Binder, Binder GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) for 24 h prior to gas exposure. After being hermetically sealed, precise amounts of PH3 gas were injected into the desiccators through Swagelok snap fittings (304, 3/8 in. i.d. × 8 mm, Shanghai Yihao Co., Shanghai, China), using a gas-tight syringe. For precision, measurements of the PH3 concentration were taken both 30 min post-injection and again 10 min prior to ventilation, employing a gas chromatograph (GC6890, Agilent Technology Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA) fitted with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Post-fumigation, the desiccators were opened for ventilation for 2 h, and subsequently, the cherries were maintained under optimal rearing conditions for differing durations.
For 12 h eggs, treated cherries were maintained for 72 h and incubated to the 2nd instar stage for survival statistics. 36 h eggs (1st instar larvae) were held for 48 h to reach the 3rd instar stage before analysis. The number of pupae was counted after the 60 h post-treatment eggs (2nd instar larvae) were kept at room temperature for 72 h. For 84 h eggs (3rd instar larvae), the number of pupae was counted after 48 h of incubation at room temperature. For the 132 h eggs (pupae), treated cherries were maintained for 120 h to record the number of adults. Larvae that did not respond when prodded with a blunt probe were considered dead. Mortality was calculated as the number of dead insects divided by the total number of insects. Because the total number of eggs at 12 h and 36 h was difficult to determine, the total number of 2nd instar larvae in control group was used for calculation.

2.4. Toxicity Assay

Based on the findings of the tolerance comparison test, cherries infested with the 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii underwent fumigation with PH3 at a temperature of 3 °C. The fumigation, conducted for 4 h, was at varying concentrations of PH3, ranging from 50 to 1600 mL/m3, increasing by multiples of 2, to identify the optimal concentration for effectively controlling D. suzukii under low-temperature conditions. Following this, the infested fruits were treated with PH3 at the determined optimal concentration for durations from 0 h to 48 h at 3 °C, and the mortality rate of 3rd instar D. suzukii was recorded. For each test, 6 cherries, harboring approximately 130 larvae in total, underwent the specified fumigation procedure and then transferred to rearing conditions. Each treatment was replicated three times.

2.5. Large-Scale Test

After obtaining the results of the toxicity assay, the potential fumigation protocol underwent a validation test. In this experiment, 120 cherries were infested with D. suzukii in three rearing cages for 12 h. Subsequently, the cherries were kept in standard rearing conditions for 72 h to monitor the infestation levels. Additionally, 100 control cherries were randomly selected and maintained under the rearing conditions. Prior to evaluating the effectiveness of the fumigation, a larval count was conducted on both the treated and control cherries to accurately assess the fruit infestation rate [20].
A total of 660 cherries, infested with pests along with 152 healthy cherries intended for quality assessment, were placed into a 175 L stainless steel fumigation chamber with dimensions of 72 cm × 45 cm × 54 cm, which has been cooled to 3 °C for 24 h in a precisely controlled environmental chamber (KBF720, WTC Binder) to ensure optimal conditions for the fumigation process. During the fumigation process, the concentrations of PH3 and CO2 were measured 30 min following the initial injection and then periodically every 0.5 h, employing the identical methodology and equipment detailed earlier for PH3 analysis. When the fumigation was complete, the chambers underwent ventilation for 4 h in a fume hood. The infected cherries were kept under regular rearing conditions and underwent a thorough dissection 72 h later. Any larvae exhibiting movement or pupation were categorized as survivors. Concurrently, a control group of 76 untreated cherries was maintained at the fumigation temperature for 168 h.

2.6. Postharvest Quality Evaluation

Following the fumigation treatment, three varieties of cherry samples (Citrine, Red light, Mei zao) were randomly selected from both the treated and control groups at various intervals of 1 d, 7 d, and 14 d during storage at 3 °C. Samples were subjected to analyses to assess fruit appearance, respiration rate, relative conductivity, firmness, soluble solid content (SSC), and titratable acidity (TA). All experiments were conducted with three independent replicates.

2.6.1. Visual Quality or Appearance

The appearances of cherries were recorded by a Canon camera (EOS 2000D, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) after 14 days of treatment with low-temperature PH3 fumigation.

2.6.2. Respiration Measurement

The respiration experiment adhered to a protocol published by Zou et al. [15]. Nine randomly selected samples of cherries from three different varieties (Citrine, Red light, Mei zao) were placed in 6 L glass containers. After incubating the samples at 0 h and after 4 h, a 0.4 mL gas sample was extracted. The concentration of CO2 in these samples was measured using gas chromatography (GC), and the respiration rates were calculated accordingly, expressed in milliliters per gram per hour (mL·g−1·h−1).

2.6.3. Determination of Relative Conductivity

A double-edged blade was used to cut the peel of cherry fruit into a 1 mm thickness, with 1 g peel placed into a 50 mL beaker, followed by 20 mL distilled water. The solution was stirred at 25 °C for 20 min, and its electrical conductivity (D1) was measured with a DDS-307A (Rex Electric Chemical, Shanghai, China) conductivity meter. Then, the peel and the extract were boiled for 30 min. After cooling, distilled water was added to 25 mL, and the electrical conductivity (D2) was determined after mixing evenly. Relative conductivity was then calculated using the formula: Relative Conductivity = (D1/D2) × 100%. Five cherries were measured in each group and the experiment was repeated 3 times.

2.6.4. Fruit Firmness, SSC and TA

For each treatment, 3 cherries were selected for firmness measurements using a TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK), following the methodology outlined by Cai et al. (2006) [24]. The probe, with a 5 mm diameter, was inserted 4 mm deep into the cherry flesh at a rate of 1 mm/s.
Following the firmness assessments, juice samples were extracted from the same 3 cherries used earlier. The soluble solid content (SSC) was determined using a handheld refractometer (GMK-701R, G-won Hitech Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea), while the titratable acidity (TA) was measured with an acidity meter (GMK-855, G-won Hitech Co., Ltd., Republic of Korea).

2.7. Data Analysis

Mortality rates were corrected using Abbott’s formula. The means and standard error (SE) of three replicates were arranged and categorized using Excel (2021) statistical software. SPSS 16.0 software from IBM Corporation was employed to identify differences between the tolerance test and the toxicity test treatment group and the control group. The Tukey HSD test analysis was used to compare treatment means at a significance level of p < 0.05. Probit analysis was performed using Polo Plus software (Version: 2.0), using time as the independent variable and the mortality probability value as the dependent variable (LeOra Software, Berkeley, CA, USA). The estimated efficacy (1 − Pu), was determined using a designated formula,
1 P u = ( 1 C ) 1 / n
where C represents the level of confidence and n denotes the quantity of test insects involved [25].

3. Results

3.1. Development of D. suzukii in Cherry Fruit

The proportion of each developmental stage is shown in Figure 1 for D. suzukii cultured in naturally infected cherry for 24 h to 264 h. Eggs began to hatch after 24 h, and by 48 h, most of the 1st instar larvae were observed, with a few having developed into the 2nd instar. By 72 h, about 70% of the larvae had reached the 2nd instar stage. From 96 h to 120 h, the larvae were mainly in their 3rd instar, while from 144 h to 216 h, they were concentrated in the pupal stage. At 240 h, the first adults emerged, and by 264 h, 50% of the pupae had emerged as adults.

3.2. Third Instar Larvae Exhibit Highest Tolerance to PH3 Fumigation in D. suzukii

The survival rates of D. suzukii at different developmental stages under phosphine fumigation at 3 °C are shown in Table 1. Egg stage and pupal stage were the most sensitive to phosphine fumigation, followed by second and 1st instar larvae. The results showed that the 3rd instar D. suzukii larvae in cherry fruits had the strongest tolerance. These larvae were used for the subsequent toxicity test.

3.3. Toxicity Test-Screening for Optimal Phosphine Treatment Concentration

Phosphine treatment with different concentrations at 3 °C was used to determine the optimal fumigation concentration. In the range of 0 mL/m3 to 800 mL/m3, the mortality rate of the 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii increased with the increase in concentration. However, compared to 800 mL/m3, there was no significant difference in mortality at 1600 mL/m3, indicating that 800 mL/m3 is the optimal fumigation concentration of phosphine (Table 2).
The phosphine concentration of 800 mL/m3, which can effectively control the 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii, was used for treatment. The probit analysis results showed that the heterogeneity value of the probit model was small (<1), indicating a good fit between estimation and data. Based on the resulting probit 9 value of 90.979 h (95% CI:72.38~118.44), 84 h was selected as a potential treatment schedule for further validation tests (Table 3).
According to statistics, the infection rate of 3rd instar D. suzukii was 21–27 larvae/cherry. As shown in Table 4, 31,186, 30,166, and 30,635 larvae from different varieties of cherry were treated according to the infection rate; no survivors were found, and the treatment efficiency reached 0.9997.

3.4. Quality Evaluation of Cherries

3.4.1. Visual Quality

Based on the results of toxicity test, we evaluated the effects of PH3 treatment at 3 °C for 84 h on the appearance quality of three cherry cultivars. As shown in Figure 2, there was no visible difference in the appearance of the three types of cherries 14 days after fumigation, compared to the control group.

3.4.2. Firmness

As can be seen from Figure 3a–c, there are differences in the hardness of cherries among different varieties, with the Citrine varieties being softer than that of the Mei zao and Red light varieties. However, the hardness test results indicated that the hardness of the three kinds of cherries remained unchanged after fumigation.

3.4.3. Soluble Solids

Figure 3d–f shows that the changes in the soluble solids content of three cherry varieties after fumigation. The levels of soluble solids in the three varieties were basically consistent, and the fumigation treatment did not have a negative effect on them.

3.4.4. Titrable Acidity

By measuring acidity, it can be observed that Citrine varieties exhibited the highest-level titrable acidity, followed by Mei zao. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the titrable acidity of the three cherry varieties after 14 days of fumigation compared to the control (Figure 3g–i).

3.4.5. Respiration Rate

As shown in Figure 3g–l, the change in respiration rate is more obvious than other indicators. The Citrine varieties and Red light varieties showed a significant increase in respiration rate during the first day and again on the seventh day. In contrast, the control group’s respiration rate remained relatively stable. After treatment, the respiration rate of Citrine varieties increased but returned to normal levels by the 14th day. The Meizao varieties also showed a significant increase in respiration rate on the first day, but it had recovered to normal levels by the seventh day.

3.4.6. Relative Conductivity

In Figure 3m–o, the conductivity of the three kinds of cherries, when fumigated, has not changed significantly.

4. Discussion

Phosphine (PH3), widely used as a fumigant for pest control in stored grains and commodities, is particularly effective when combined with carbon dioxide, decomposing into harmless phosphates [26,27,28]. Its advantages encompass effective pest penetration, absence of residue, and low cost, despite the consideration that long-term exposure may pose a drawback [9,29,30]. Low temperatures, primarily utilized for disinfecting stored agricultural products from pests or for quarantine purposes, have also demonstrated effectiveness against pests such as Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha suspensa [31,32]. Furthermore, they can significantly reduce adult emergence in fruits like blueberries and strawberries, thereby extending their shelf life [33]. Thus, low temperatures present a viable option not only for pest control but also for maintaining the marketability of fruits [33,34]. The objective of this research was to identify the most tolerant life stage of D. suzukii to phosphine fumigation under low-temperature conditions; to determine mortality trends across various phosphine concentrations; to evaluate the impact of treatment conditions on the quality of cherry fruits; and to establish a safe and practical fumigation protocol. This research is critical to managing the economically crucial fruit fly pest and provides a fresh perspective and scientific rationale for developing innovative pest control strategies.
In examining D. suzukii tolerance to low-temperature phosphine fumigation across developmental stages, we observed a phenomenon running counter to common perceptions. While the pupal stage is generally regarded as the most tolerant insect stage to fumigants, our findings indicate that the final instar larval stage exhibits the highest tolerance to low-temperature phosphine treatment (Table 1). This result contrasts with previous studies, including work by S. Manivannan (2015), who found that the pupal stage of Tribolium castaneum exhibited the greatest resistance to low-temperature phosphine fumigation [35]. However, our findings are more consistent with those of Ma et al. (2024), who observed that among the different developmental stages of B. dorsalis, the 3 L stage shows a higher tolerance to phosphine [36], which may be related to specific physiological mechanisms and metabolic pathways in the larvae. In view of this phenomenon, we think that the late-stage larvae may accumulate certain stress resistant substances or mechanisms during development, so that they can resist the toxic effects of low-temperature phosphine. This echoes the findings of C. Austin et al. (2019), who found that the late larval stage of Drosophila melanogaster is more adaptive to temperature changes than the pupal stage [37]; similarly, Kathrine E. Pedersen et al. (2020) also observed that the final larval stage of the beetle Tenebrio molitor is more tolerant to insecticide than the pupal stage due to differences in uptake, elimination, and detoxifying enzyme activity [38].
When examining the relationship between phosphine concentration and D. suzukii mortality, we observed a dose-dependent increase in mortality across the 200–800 mL/m3 range, but the mortality plateaued at 1600 mL/m3 (Table 2). This finding is similar to some previous research; for example, Evagelia Lampiri (2021) found that high concentrations of phosphine can have a paralyzing effect on insects, and there exists a “sweet spot” where mortality does not increases with increasing concentration [39]. Additionally, the influence of the insect supercooling point effect cannot be ruled out. According to J. Mckenzie et al., the supercooling point temperature of D. melanogaster is around 13 °C [40]. Meanwhile, Štětina et al. (2019) reported that supercooling triggers the immune response in Drosophila larvae that enhances their stress resistance [41]. Therefore, it is speculated that phosphine treatment at 3 °C might cause the internal temperature of insects to plummet, triggering the mechanism of the supercooling point, and thereby improving their tolerance to fumigants. However, this situation may need to be considered by examining the interaction between the cold tolerance mechanism of insects and the toxicity of phosphine. In order to more accurately understand this phenomenon, further studies will be carried out to explore the physiological response and adaptive mechanism of insects under low temperature stress and phosphine treatment.
To further explore and refine control methods for D. suzukii, we carried out systematic experiments and analyses. By evaluating the toxicity of phosphine at different developmental stages of the insect and applying probit analysis, we established treatment indexes for effectively managing D. suzukii (Table 3). The indexes, which take into account specific phosphine concentrations and precise temperature conditions, provide a crucial basis for developing a practical and effective fumigation protocol. Our approach is similar to that of Zou et al. (2024) [15], who established an experimental system to assess the impact of fumigants on pest control. Furthermore, we also assessed the impact of the treatment conditions on cherry fruit quality. By examining key quality indicators, including appearance, firmness, acidity, and electrical conductivity, we confirmed that low-temperature phosphine treatment effectively controls D. suzukii without compromising cherry fruit quality (Figure 2 and Figure 3). These results align with Liu’s (2008) findings that low-temperature phosphine fumigation efficiently controls pests of perishable commodities without compromising berry quality [42]. However, caution is warranted in interpreting these results, as fumigation efficacy may vary considerably depending on ecological factors including fruit species, maturity stage, and the presence of biotic competitors or natural enemies.
In summary, this study identified the late larval stage as the most tolerant instar during low-temperature phosphine fumigation for controlling D. suzukii, as well as examined mortality trends and potential underlying causes across various phosphine concentrations. These findings not only provide an interesting contrast and complement to previous research but also serve as a crucial reference for the fruit industry to develop more sustainable and effective pest management strategies. Future research should focus on refining this fumigation technique and exploring its applicability in other crops and geographical regions. Additionally, in order to fully understand the response mechanism of insects to fumigants, it is necessary to deepen the exploration and research into their stress resistance mechanism and physiological adaptability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z., L.L. and T.L.; methodology, L.L., B.L., J.Z., Y.X., Y.R., J.H. and W.C.; resources, T.L. and Y.R.; formal analysis, H.Z. and B.L.; investigation, L.L., J.Z. and T.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z., L.L. and J.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.Z., L.L., B.L., J.Z., Y.X., Y.R., J.H., W.C. and T.L.; supervision, L.L., Y.R. and T.L.; project administration, T.L.; funding acquisition, T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (project code: 2023YFE0207400), entitled “Cooperative research on international standards for the biosecurity disposal of several quarantine pests of cross-border trade concerns” and the Science and Technology Project of the State Administration for Market Regulation, the Technical Support Fund on Postharvest Control of Biological Contaminants of the State Administration for Market Regulation (No. 2025).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rednicka-Tober, D.; Ponder, A.; Hallmann, E.; Gowacka, A.; Rozpara, E. The Profile and Content of Polyphenols and Carotenoids in Local and Commercial Sweet Cherry Fruits (Prunus avium L.) and Their Antioxidant Activity In Vitro. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zun-Ying, L.; Shi-Yuan, D.; Ming-Yong, Z.; Ya-Nan, D.U. Effects of 1-MCP on the post-harvested decay and quality of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruits. Food Sci. Technol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clayton-Cuch, D.; Yu, L.; Mcdougal, D.; Burbidge, C.A.; Bruning, J.B.; Bradley, D.; Bttcher, C.; Bulone, V. Biochemical and in silico characterization of glycosyltransferases from red sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) reveals their broad specificity toward phenolic substrates. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2024, 8, 100193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Murphy, K.A.; Unruh, T.R.; Zhou, L.M.; Zalom, F.G.; Shearer, P.W.; Beers, E.H.; Walton, V.M.; Miller, B.; Chiu, J.C. Using comparative genomics to develop a molecular diagnostic for the identification of an emerging pest Drosophila suzukii. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2015, 105, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mackey, B.; Swedman, A.; Follett, P.A. Effect of Low-Oxygen Conditions Created by Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Radiation Tolerance in Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Sweet Cherries. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 11, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, G.H. Synergistic Effect of Cold Treatment Combined with Ethyl Formate Fumigation against Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Insects 2022, 13, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kwon, T.H.; Park, C.G.; Lee, B.H.; Zarders, D.R.; Cha, D.H. Ethyl formate fumigation and ethyl formate plus cold treatment combination as potential phytosanitary quarantine treatments of Drosophila suzukii in blueberries. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2021, 24, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bing, X.L.; Gerlach, J.; Loeb, G.; Buchon, N. Nutrient-Dependent Impact of Microbes on Drosophila suzukii Development. mBio 2018, 9, mbio.02199-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Biondi, A.; Traugott, M.; Desneux, N. Special issue on Drosophila suzukii: From global invasion to sustainable control. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 603–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goodhue, R.E.; Bolda, M.; Farnsworth, D.; Williams, J.C.; Zalom, F.G. Spotted wing drosophila infestation of California strawberries and raspberries: Economic analysis of potential revenue losses and control costs. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1396–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deans, C.; Hutchison, W. The Protein Paradox: Elucidating the Complex Nutritional Ecology of the Invasive Berry Pest, Spotted-Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophila suzukii). Front. Insect Sci. 2021, 1, 787169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Follett, P.A.; Swedman, A.; Prices, D.K. Postharvest irradiation treatment for quarantine control of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in fresh commodities. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, J.S.; Kim, M.J.; Choi, D.S.; Kim, I. Complete mitochondrial genome of the spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 222–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, X.; Liu, Y.-B. Nitric Oxide Fumigation for Control of Spotted Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Strawberries. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1180–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zou, H.; Li, L.; Li, B.; Ren, Y.; Liu, T. Phosphine and phosphine plus ethyl formate for controlling papaya mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on succulents. J. Econ. Entomol. 2024, 118, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, L.; Liu, T.; Li, B.; Zhang, F.; Dong, S.; Wang, Y. Toxicity of Phosphine Fumigation Against Bactrocera tau at Low Temperature. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, T.; Li, L.; Zhang, F.; Gong, S.; Li, T.; Zhan, G.; Wang, Y. Effect of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation on the Survival ofBactrocera correcta(Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 1624–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.B. Low-temperature phosphine fumigation of chilled lettuce under insulated cover for postharvest control of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera:Thripidae). J. Asia-Pac Entomol. 2011, 14, 323–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Ren, L.; Gong, S.; Liu, T. Low temperature phosphine fumigation for postharvest control of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on oriental lily. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 100, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, T.; Li, L.; Li, B.; Zhan, G.; Wang, Y. Evaluation of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Control of Oriental Fruit Fly in Loquat Fruit. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.-B. Low-Temperature Fumigation of Harvested Lettuce Using a Phosphine Generator. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1171–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Y.-B. Low Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Postharvest Control of Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on Lettuce, Broccoli, Asparagus, and Strawberry. J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1786–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, T.; Li, L.; Li, T. Effects of low temperature phosphine fumigation on postharvest quality of white chrysanthemum ‘Dabaiju’. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 142, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cai, C.; Chen, K.S.; Xu, W.P.; Zhang, W.S.; Li, X.; Ferguson, I. Effect of 1-MCP on postharvest quality of loquat fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 40, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Couey, M.H.; Victor, C. Confidence Limits and Sample Size in Quarantine Research. J. Econ. Entomol. 1986, 79, 887–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alzahrani, S.M.; Ebert, P.R. Pesticidal Toxicity of Phosphine and Its Interaction with Other Pest Control Treatments. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 2461–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bolonhezi, S.; Athié, I.; Gomes, R.A.; Valentini, S.R.; De Castro, M.P.M. Effects of carbon dioxide and phosphine mixtures on resistant populations of stored-grain insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1998, 34, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  28. Constantin, M.; Jagadeesan, R.; Chandra, K.; Ebert, P.; Nayak, M.K. Synergism Between Phosphine (PH3) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2): Implications for Managing PH3 Resistance in Rusty Grain Beetle (Laemophloeidae: Coleoptera). J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 1999–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Andreadis, S.S.; Athanassiou, C.G. A review of insect cold hardiness and its potential in stored product insect control. Crop Prot. 2017, 91, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chaudhry, M.Q. Phosphine resistance. Pestic. Outlook 2000, 11, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De Lima, C.P.; Jessup, A.J.; Mansfield, E.R.; Daniels, D. Cold treatment of table grapes infested with Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) Diptera: Tephritidae. N. Z. J. Crop. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 39, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Benschoter, C.A. Low-Temperature Storage as a Quarantine Treatment for the Caribbean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Florida Citrus. J. Econ. Entomol. 1984, 77, 1233–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saeed, N.; Tonina, L.; Battisti, A.; Mori, N. Postharvest short cold temperature treatment to preserve fruit quality after Drosophila suzukii damage. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2020, 66, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. El-Ramady, H.R.; Domokos-Szabolcsy, V.; Abdalla, N.A.; Taha, H.S.; Fári, M. Postharvest Management of Fruits and Vegetables Storage; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Manivannan, S. Toxicity of phosphine on the developmental stages of rust-red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst over a range of concentrations and exposures. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 6810–6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, Y.; Li, L.; Li, B.; Liu, Q.; Ren, Y.L.; Wang, P.; Liu, T. Phosphine fumigation followed by forced hot-air treatment for postharvest control of Bactrocera dorsalis in dragon fruit. J. Pest Sci. 2024, 98, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Austin, C.J.; Moehring, A.J. Local thermal adaptation detected during multiple life stages across populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 2019, 32, 1342–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pedersen, K.E.; Pedersen, N.N.; Meyling, N.V.; Fredensborg, B.L.; Cedergreen, N. Differences in life stage sensitivity of the beetle Tenebrio molitor towards a pyrethroid insecticide explained by stage-specific variations in uptake, elimination and activity of detoxifying enzymes—ScienceDirect. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 162, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lampiri, E.; Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G. Delayed mortality, resistance and the sweet spot, as the good, the bad and the ugly in phosphine use. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mckenzie, J.A. The Influence of Low Temperature on Survival and Reproduction in Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. Aust. J. Zool. 1975, 23, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Štětina, T.; Poupardin, R.; Moos, M.; Šimek, P.; Šmilauer, P.; Koštál, V. Larvae of Drosophila melanogaster exhibit transcriptional activation of immune response pathways and antimicrobial peptides during recovery from supercooling stress. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 105, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, B. Advances in Postharvest Pest Control on Perishable Commodities Using Ultralow Oxygen Treatment and Low Temperature Phosphine Fumigation. In Proceedings of the Controlled Atmosphere & Fumigation in Stored Products International Conference, Chengdu, China, 21–26 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Proportions of various developmental stages (egg, first instar larva, second instar larva, third instar larva, pupa and adult) of D. suzukii in infested cherry incubated at 26 ± 2 °C for 0–264 h. Data are expressed as means ± SE.
Figure 1. Proportions of various developmental stages (egg, first instar larva, second instar larva, third instar larva, pupa and adult) of D. suzukii in infested cherry incubated at 26 ± 2 °C for 0–264 h. Data are expressed as means ± SE.
Insects 16 00635 g001
Figure 2. Effects of 800 mL/m3 PH3 fumigation for 84 h at 3 °C on the appearance of three cherry varieties: (a) Citrine, (b) Red light, (c) Mei zao. CK: control group; T: treatment group.
Figure 2. Effects of 800 mL/m3 PH3 fumigation for 84 h at 3 °C on the appearance of three cherry varieties: (a) Citrine, (b) Red light, (c) Mei zao. CK: control group; T: treatment group.
Insects 16 00635 g002
Figure 3. (ac) Firmness, (df) soluble solids, (gi) titrable acidity, (jl) respiration rate, and (mo) relative conductivity of Citrine, Red light, and Mei zao after fumigation with 800 mL/m3 PH3 for 84 h at 3 °C. Data are presented as mean ± SE (standard error), with significant differences denoted by different letters based on a Tukey HSD test at p < 0.05 (ns: p > 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). CK represents the control cherries.
Figure 3. (ac) Firmness, (df) soluble solids, (gi) titrable acidity, (jl) respiration rate, and (mo) relative conductivity of Citrine, Red light, and Mei zao after fumigation with 800 mL/m3 PH3 for 84 h at 3 °C. Data are presented as mean ± SE (standard error), with significant differences denoted by different letters based on a Tukey HSD test at p < 0.05 (ns: p > 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). CK represents the control cherries.
Insects 16 00635 g003
Table 1. Survival rate of different life cycles of D. suzukii following a 4 h exposure to 400 mL/m3 PH3 at 3 °C.
Table 1. Survival rate of different life cycles of D. suzukii following a 4 h exposure to 400 mL/m3 PH3 at 3 °C.
Instar4 h
No. of InsectsMortality ± SE (%)No. of InsectsCorrected Mortality ± SE (%)
Egg43610.43% a53390.77% a
1st instar Larva (1 L)3298.31% ab37262.41% b
2nd instar Larva (2 L)3226.53% ab35771.36% b
3rd instar Larva (3 L)3591.69% b27820.09% c
Pupa1301.70% b52090.19% a
ANOVAF = 6.83; df = 4, 10; p < 0.01F = 181.22; df = 4, 10; p < 0.001
Distinct letter denote statistical variations in the mean survival across various insect stages (p < 0.05). SE, standard error.
Table 2. Mortality of 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii exposed to different concentrations of PH3 at 3 °C for 4 h.
Table 2. Mortality of 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii exposed to different concentrations of PH3 at 3 °C for 4 h.
PH3 (mL/m3)4 h
No. of InsectsMortality ± SE (%)Corrected Mortality ± SE (%)
01600.61 ± 0.86 d0.00 ± 0.00 f
5041923.16 ± 3.08 e22.70 ± 2.67 e
10031833.61 ± 4.03 d31.75 ± 1.95 d
20019541.90 ± 1.47 c41.71 ± 1.47 c
40023472.56 ± 4.52 b73.22 ± 4.3 b
80026782.70 ± 1.93 a82.58 ± 2.1 a
160018285.83 ± 2.84 a85.72 ± 2.97 a
ANOVAF = 243.16; df = 6, 14; p < 0.001F = 339.08; df = 6, 14; p < 0.001
Distinct letter denote statistical variations in the mean mortality across various insect stages (p < 0.05). SE, standard error.
Table 3. Probit analysis of 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii treated with 800 mL/m3 PH3 at 3 °C.
Table 3. Probit analysis of 3rd instar larvae of D. suzukii treated with 800 mL/m3 PH3 at 3 °C.
TreatmentnSlope ± SEHetero. aLT50 (95% CI)
(Lower–Upper)
LT90 (95% CI)
(Lower–Upper)
LT99 (95% CI)
(Lower–Upper)
LT99.9968 (95% CI)
(Lower–Upper)
Low
Temperature
PH3 fumigation
27322.513 ±
0.097
0.942.33
(2.11~2.56)
10.51
(9.49~11.77)
19.63
(17.18~22.29)
90.98
(72.38~118.44)
a Heterogeneity.
Table 4. Efficacy analysis of a large-scale test of D. suzukii on three cherry varieties (Citrine, Red light, Mei zao).
Table 4. Efficacy analysis of a large-scale test of D. suzukii on three cherry varieties (Citrine, Red light, Mei zao).
TimeTemperatureConcentration of PH3Variety of CherryNumber of LarvaePhytosanitory Treatment
Efficacy
84 h3 °C800 mL/m3Citrine31,1860.9997
Red light30,1660.9997
Mei zao30,6350.9997
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Xiao, Y.; Ren, Y.; Huang, J.; Chen, W.; Liu, T. Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation Is Effective Against Drosophila suzukii in Sweet Cherry. Insects 2025, 16, 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060635

AMA Style

Zou H, Li L, Zhang J, Li B, Xiao Y, Ren Y, Huang J, Chen W, Liu T. Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation Is Effective Against Drosophila suzukii in Sweet Cherry. Insects. 2025; 16(6):635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060635

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Hang, Li Li, Jun Zhang, Baishu Li, Yu Xiao, Yonglin Ren, Ju Huang, Wei Chen, and Tao Liu. 2025. "Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation Is Effective Against Drosophila suzukii in Sweet Cherry" Insects 16, no. 6: 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060635

APA Style

Zou, H., Li, L., Zhang, J., Li, B., Xiao, Y., Ren, Y., Huang, J., Chen, W., & Liu, T. (2025). Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation Is Effective Against Drosophila suzukii in Sweet Cherry. Insects, 16(6), 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060635

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop