Next Article in Journal
BmHR3 Is Essential for Silk Gland Development and Silk Protein Synthesis in Silkworms (Bombyx mori)
Next Article in Special Issue
Habitat Suitability Analysis for Luehdorfia chinensis Leech, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River: A Study Based on the MaxEnt Model
Previous Article in Journal
Species Composition, Ecological Preferences, and Chromosomal Polymorphism of Malaria Mosquitoes of the Crimean Peninsula and the Black Sea Coast of the Caucasus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conservation Genetics of the Endangered Danube Clouded Yellow Butterfly Colias myrmidone (Esper, 1780) in the Last Central European Stronghold: Diversity, Wolbachia Infection and Balkan Connections
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adaptability of Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia to Different Host Plants in Yunan

1
Key Laboratory of Breeding and Utilization of Resource Insects of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Institute of Highland Forest Science, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, China
2
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Breeding and Utilization of Resource Insects, Kunming 650224, China
3
Graduate School, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(4), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040368
Submission received: 3 February 2025 / Revised: 25 March 2025 / Accepted: 27 March 2025 / Published: 1 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Butterfly Diversity and Conservation)

Simple Summary

This research seeks to identify the local host plants of Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia and assess the suitability of various host plants for the butterfly, thereby offering a scientific basis for the conservation of its population in the region. Two documented host plants, two plants with observed larval feeding, and two additional host plants recorded for other butterfly species were selected. Based on tests of adult oviposition and larval feeding preferences, Cynanchum annularium and Cynanchum corymbosum were found to be the most appropriate host plants. These species are also found locally in Yuanjiang. An age-stage, two-sex life table was created to examine physiological indicators after the butterfly uses these host plants, and population dynamics were simulated for the next 60 days. The results confirmed that C. annularium and C. corymbosum are local host plants for D. genutia, with C. annularium being the more suitable of the two.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the local host plant range for Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia (Cramer, 1779) and evaluate the effects of different host plants on its growth, development, and reproductive success. This research assesses adult oviposition preferences and larval feeding tendencies on various host plants. An age-stage, two-sex life table was constructed to analyze the butterfly’s growth, development, reproductive success, survival rates, and other physiological aspects on different host plants. Population dynamics over the next 60 days were simulated to offer a comprehensive evaluation of the host plant suitability for D. genutia. The results indicated that D. genutia adults preferred laying eggs on Cynanchum corymbosum, followed by C. annularium, C. rostellatum, and Asclepias curassavica, with very few eggs laid on Calotropis gigantea and Dregea volubilis. Larval feeding preferences were observed in the order of C. annularium > C. corymbosum > C. rostellatum, with A. curassavica consumed only by first-instar larvae, while C. gigantea and D. volubilis were avoided. Under identical room temperature conditions, larvae feeding on C. annularium and C. corymbosum completed a full generation. Larvae feeding on C. annularium exhibited shorter developmental periods and higher early survival rates compared to those feeding on C. corymbosum, with no significant differences in adult longevity, sex ratio, or number of eggs per female. Female adults did not die immediately after laying eggs. No significant differences in the intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), net reproduction rate (R0), or doubling time (Td) were found between populations feeding on the two host plants. However, the gross reproductive rate (GRR) and mean generation time (T) were significantly lower in the population feeding on C. corymbosum. These results confirm C. annularium and C. corymbosum as host plants for D. genutia larvae and provide a theoretical and scientific basis for the conservation of the Yuanjiang River Valley D. genutia population.

1. Introduction

The common tiger butterfly, Danaus genutia (Cramer, 1779), belonging to the Danaidae family [1], is commonly found in the subtropical and tropical regions of South Asia. The adult butterfly is medium-sized, characterized by reddish-brown forewings, black veins, and black edges. The subapical area displays five large white spots in a row, with smaller white dots along the outer and sub-outer margins. It is known for its slow and graceful flight, which enhances its aesthetic appeal. The Yuanjiang River Valley in Yunnan, China, is home to a wide variety of butterfly species, attributed to its distinct topography, geomorphology, and climate [2]. However, in the past decade, the presence of D. genutia has become increasingly rare across many parts of the valley, and the population density has declined. Although not classified as an endangered species, it has not been designated as a protected species, which has resulted in little focus on its population status. Globally, the known host plants for D. genutia mainly belong to the Apocynaceae family, including species from the Cynanchum genus such as C. otophyllum, C. giraldii, C. taiwanianum, C. rostellatum, C. formosanum, C. wallichii, and C. dalhausiae. Additionally, other plants from the Marsdenia genus, including M. tinctoria and M. formosana, as well as species from the Raphistemma (R. puolchellum and R. lemma) and Pergularia (P. daemia and P. odoratissima) genera, and additional plants from the Asclepias, Ceropegia, Graphistemma, Gymnema, Sarcostemma, Stephanotis, Telosma, and Tylophora genera are also recognized as host plants [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The host plant species, however, vary across different locations. During long-term field surveys in the Yuanjiang River Valley, two unreported Cynanchum species (C. annularium and C. corymbosum) were observed to support D. genutia larvae feeding on their leaves. Thus, identifying the host plant species for the D. genutia population in the Yuanjiang River Valley is of great importance for its conservation.
Life tables serve as a vital tool for depicting population dynamics. As early as 1921, Pearl and Parker utilized life tables to study experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster [10], and in 1954, Morris and Miller applied life tables to analyze natural populations of Choristoneura fumiferana [11]. However, traditional life tables fail to account for the role of males in the population, which limits their ability to fully represent changes in insect populations. The age-stage, two-sex life table addresses this limitation, offering a more accurate depiction of how age differentiation and sex ratio influence population dynamics [12,13,14]. In insect population studies, life tables often rely on individual rearing methods to gather detailed growth and development data for each individual, but this approach ignores interactions between individuals and density-dependent effects [15]. Life table parameters derived from group rearing methods may more effectively reflect the natural population dynamics of D. genutia. Most current insect life table studies focus on integrated pest management in agriculture and forestry [16,17,18], with fewer investigations on rare butterfly populations [19,20].
This study examines the oviposition preferences of adult D. genutia and the feeding preferences of larvae on various host plants. To evaluate the physiological impacts of host plant adaptation, we constructed age-stage, two-sex life tables to analyze key parameters, including growth, development, reproductive capacity, survival rates, and other physiological factors of D. genutia on different host plants. Finally, based on the life table data, this study simulates and predicts population dynamics over the next 60 days. This research offers a comprehensive evaluation of the suitability of different host plants for D. genutia and provides a scientific foundation for the conservation of both the Yuanjiang River Valley D. genutia population and its host plant resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The experiment was carried out in Molangqing, Shanjiao Village, Lijiang Town, Yuanjiang County, Yuxi City, Yunnan Province (coordinates: 101°58′39″ E, 23°33′53″ N, elevation: 556 m).

2.2. Establishment of Near-Natural Experimental Population

Between October and November 2022, adult male and female D. genutia butterflies were collected from the Yuanjiang River Valley and placed into a netted breeding chamber for rearing. The chamber covered an area of 80 m2 (10 m × 8 m) and had an arched roof with a height of 5 m and a ridge height of 1.5 m. A partition layer made of 40-mesh silver-gray nylon netting (with 40 mesh holes per 25.4 mm length) was used to prevent the adults from escaping and to stop predators from entering. To mimic a natural habitat, a variety of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants were planted within the chamber, with a water source also set up for adults to drink from. The ventilation and lighting conditions were designed to replicate natural environmental conditions as closely as possible. Local host plants for D. genutia, such as C. annularium and C. corymbosum, along with nectar plants like Lantana camara, were also included to provide nutritional support.

2.3. Oviposition Preference of Adults on Different Plants

The experiment included two documented host plants (A. curassavica, C. rostellatum) [4,6], two local host plants (C. annularium and C. corymbosum) from Yuanjiang, and two non-D. genutia host plants (Dregea volubilis and Calotropis gigantea). D. volubilis and C. gigantea are known to be host plants for the Tirumala limniace and D. chrysippus populations in Yuanjiang, respectively [4]. The plants were sourced from the Yuanjiang region, except for C. rostellatum, which was introduced from Nantong, Jiangsu Province. Following the methods described by Liao et al. [21] and Jiang et al. [22], six potted plants with similar leaf biomass were arranged in a 2 × 3 rectangular layout at a height of 1.5 m, with 2 m spacing between each plant. A total of 20 pairs of 4–6 day-old adult butterflies were randomly selected from the near-natural experimental population for the test, with L. camara serving as a nectar supplement. After oviposition, the number of eggs laid on each host plant was counted and recorded at 18:00 daily. Subsequently, newly prepared oviposition plants were placed in the same locations. This process was repeated for three days with three replications per day, resulting in a total of 9 observations (n = 9), in a 10 m × 8 m × 6.5 m 40-mesh silver-gray netted room (Figure 1).

2.4. Larval Feeding Preference on Different Plants

The leaf disc method [23,24] was utilized to assess the feeding preference of D. genutia larvae at different developmental stages on six plant species described in Section 2.3. Leaves with similar thickness from the six plant species were chosen, cut to a uniform size, and arranged in sufficient amounts around the circumference of circular plastic baskets with small holes. The leaves were placed randomly with equal spacing to ensure the larvae had adequate access to food during the experiment. A wet towel was positioned at the bottom of each basket to maintain leaf hydration. After a 5 h starvation period, for each instar (1st to 5th), 20 larvae were introduced to the center of the baskets separately, and their feeding preferences were monitored and recorded after 2 h. A larva was considered to have fed on a specific plant if the following conditions were met: (1) it was directly observed chewing the leaf surface or edge; (2) fresh feeding damage (e.g., irregular holes or scraped tissues) was found on the leaf where the larva was located; (3) the larva remained on the leaf for >30 s. The number of larvae feeding on each of the six plant species was recorded individually. Each instar group was tested with three independent replicates, resulting in a total of 15 experimental observations (5 instars × 3 replicates). Smaller baskets (Ø19 cm, h = 5 cm) were used for first- and second-instar larvae, while third- to fifth-instar larvae were placed in larger baskets (Ø25 cm, h = 8 cm). To minimize the effect of larval phototaxis on feeding preferences, all experiments were carried out in a room with blackout curtains.

2.5. Establishment of D. genutia Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table

During the peak oviposition period, C. annularium and C. corymbosum were used as oviposition plants. After 12 h of oviposition by female adults, 100 eggs were collected from each plant as the test insect source and placed in two breeding chambers with the same configuration as described in Section 2.2 for group rearing. The changes in insect stages and survival rates on both plant species were monitored daily at 09:00. Following adult emergence, the number of eggs laid on host plants and other surrounding plants was counted and recorded daily at 18:00. All eggs laid that day were then removed from the breeding chambers. The next day, the same method was used to record the daily egg production of female adults until death. At the conclusion of the experiment, if all male adults had died, the surviving females were paired with an equal number of randomly selected males from the insect source, and the egg production and lifespan of the remaining females were documented. Similarly, if all female adults had died, the surviving males were paired with an equal number of randomly selected females from the insect source, but only the lifespan of the remaining males was documented. The experiment ended when all test insects had died [25]. This study was carried out under natural fluctuating temperatures and humidity (24.0–33.6 °C, 56.4–71.9% RH) in August–September 2024 [26]. Based on the principles of age-stage, two-sex life tables [27,28,29], data from the experiment were used to construct a breeding age-stage, two-sex life table for the D. genutia population. To obtain detailed individual-level data on growth and development (enabling calculation of population parameter means, standard errors, and comparisons between populations feeding on different host plants), the group-reared life table was converted to an individually-reared life table, after which all parameters were calculated [15].
The specific age-stage survival rate Sxj indicates the probability of an individual surviving from egg to age x at stage j; the specific age survival rate lx represents the total survival rate across all life stages at age x; the specific age-stage female adult fecundity fxj denotes the average egg production of female adults at age x and stage j; the specific age fecundity mx refers to the average egg production of the population at age x; the specific age net fecundity lxmx represents the net fecundity of the population at age x; the specific age-stage expected lifespan exj describes the expected survival time of an individual at age x and stage j; and the specific age-stage reproductive value vxj reflects the average contribution of an individual to population growth at age x and stage j. The calculation formulas are as follows:
S xj = n xj n 0 , 1
l x = m j = 1 S xj
f xj = e x n x
m x = j = 1 m S xj   f xj j = 1 m S xj
l x m x = l x × m x
e xj = i = x   m y = j S iy
v xj = e r ( x + 1 ) S xj i = x e - r ( i + 1 ) m y = j S iy f iy
where x denotes age, j represents the stage, m indicates the total number of stages, ex is the total egg production of all female adults at age x, nx is the total number of female adults at age x, and Siy is the probability that an individual survives from age x at stage j to age i at stage y.
Based on these parameters, the life table parameters for D. genutia were also determined, including the following: gross reproductive rate (GRR), intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), net reproduction rate (R0), mean generation time (T), and population doubling time (Td). The formulas for these calculations are as follows:
GRR = m x
r = ln R 0 T
λ = e r
R 0 = x = 0 l x   m x
T = ln R 0 r
T d = ln ( 2 ) r

2.6. Data Analysis

Calculate the plant oviposition rate and the larval feeding preference rate using the following formula: Percentage of eggs on the plant = (number of eggs laid on a particular plant/total number of eggs laid) × 100%. Larval feeding preference rate = (number of larvae feeding on a particular plant/total number of larvae) × 100%. The oviposition preference of D. genutia adults and the feeding preferences of larvae were analyzed using SPSS 24.0, with plant species as the independent variable and the following dependent variables: eggs received per day, percentage of eggs on the plant, and larval feeding preference rate. Data normality was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test (α = 0.05). The homogeneity of variance was then tested. If the assumptions were met, a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05) was used; otherwise, Kruskal–Wallis tests and Dunn’s test were applied. The raw data of the D. genutia life table were processed using TWOSEX-MSChart (Ver. 7/6/2024) [30], yielding population and life table parameters. Average values and standard errors of these parameters were derived through bootstrap techniques involving 100,000 resampling iterations. Differences in developmental and population parameters of D. genutia on various host plants were assessed using the paired bootstrap test [31]. Population dynamics of D. genutia feeding on different host plants over a 60-day period were simulated and predicted using TIMING-MSChart (Ver. 7/6/2024) [32]. Charts were created with Origin 2022.

3. Results

3.1. Oviposition Preference of D. genutia Adults on Different Plants

Significant differences were observed in the oviposition preference of D. genutia adults among six plant species (Table 1). The egg-laying rates recorded on C. corymbosum (34.09%) and C. annularium (31.48%) showed no significant difference, both significantly higher compared to other plants. The lowest egg-laying rates were noted on C. gigantea and D. volubilis, with rates of 3.26% and 1.14%, respectively. Egg-laying rates on C. rostellatum and A. curassavica were 18.62% and 11.40%, also significantly different from other plants. These findings indicate that D. genutia adults exhibited the highest oviposition preference for C. corymbosum, followed by C. annularium, C. rostellatum, and A. curassavica, while minimal egg deposition occurred on C. gigantea and D. volubilis.

3.2. Feeding Preference of D. genutia Larvae on Different Plants

During the larval stage, D. genutia larvae fed exclusively on C. annularium, C. corymbosum, and C. rostellatum. Feeding on A. curassavica was restricted to first-instar larvae, with a feeding rate of only 8.33 ± 2.89%. Neither C. gigantea nor D. volubilis was consumed by the larvae. At the first and second instars, 23.33 ± 2.89% and 10.00 ± 5.00% of the larvae, respectively, did not select any plant for feeding. In the first instar, no significant differences were observed in feeding selectivity among C. annularium, C. corymbosum, and C. rostellatum [26.67 ± 2.89%, 21.67 ± 7.64%, and 20.00 ± 5.00%, respectively]. However, second-instar larvae demonstrated a significantly higher feeding preference for C. annularium [30.67 ± 7.64%] compared to C. rostellatum [23.33 ± 2.89%], though no significant difference was found between C. annularium and C. corymbosum [30.00 ± 5.00%] or between C. corymbosum and C. rostellatum. By the third instar, feeding selectivity for C. annularium was significantly higher than for C. corymbosum and C. rostellatum [45.00 ± 5.00%, 26.67 ± 2.89%, and 28.33 ± 7.64%, respectively]. In the fourth and fifth instars, significant differences in feeding selectivity were evident among the three plants, with C. annularium being the most preferred [41.67 ± 7.64% and 48.33 ± 2.89%, respectively], followed by C. corymbosum [35.00 ± 5.00% and 30.00 ± 5.00%, respectively] (Figure 2). Consequently, the overall feeding preference of D. genutia larvae can be ranked as C. annularium > C. corymbosum > C. rostellatum.

3.3. Life Table Parameters of D. genutia on Two Host Plants

3.3.1. Growth and Development Stages and Population Parameters of D. genutia

Under identical environmental conditions, D. genutia larvae successfully completed their life cycle when feeding on both C. annularium and C. corymbosum. The pre-adult periods for individuals feeding on C. annularium and C. corymbosum were 18.43 d and 18.87 d, respectively, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). This difference was primarily attributed to the larval stage, where the developmental period was shorter on C. annularium (8.18 d) compared to C. corymbosum (8.64 d), although no significant differences were observed in the pupal stage duration. Survival rates during the pre-adult period were significantly higher on C. annularium (0.58) compared to C. corymbosum (0.31). However, no significant differences were identified between the two host plants regarding adult longevity, sex ratio, or the number of eggs laid per female (Table 2).

3.3.2. Survival Rate and Fecundity of D. genutia

The survival rate of D. genutia larvae feeding on the two host plants shows notable variation (Figure 3). Across all life stages, the survival rate is significantly higher for individuals feeding on C. annularium compared to those feeding on C. corymbosum. Larvae reared on both host plants initiated eclosion starting on day 18. The age-stage-specific survival rate (Sxj) curves reveal overlaps among the different life stages of D. genutia, caused by variations in developmental rates among individuals. These overlaps result in the coexistence of different instars at the same time, highlighting the occurrence of overlapping generations in D. genutia.
As time advances, the individuals of D. genutia experience gradual mortality, leading to a decline in the population survival rate curve (lx) (Figure 4). The lx curve serves as a simplified version of the Sxj curve, omitting stage differentiation. Between days 5 and 22, the lx curve for D. genutia feeding on C. annularium exhibits a steady decrease, maintaining a survival rate of 58.0% on day 22, compared to 31.0% for those feeding on C. corymbosum. After day 22, both curves decline at similar rates, terminating on day 59 and day 56, respectively. Analysis of developmental parameters and Sxj curves indicates that the egg, larval, and pupal stages are the most critical periods for mortality. However, larvae and pupae feeding on C. annularium display higher survival rates compared to those feeding on C. corymbosum. Survival during the adult stage is less influenced by the host plant.
The fecundity curves of female adults (fx4), population fecundity (mx), and population net fecundity (lxmx) follow a pattern of initial increase and subsequent decrease, starting from day 24 (Figure 4). The fx4 curve, representing the daily average egg production per female adult on day x, peaks at 8.09 on day 25 (f25,4) for individuals feeding on C. annularium and at 13.10 on day 28 (f28,4) for those feeding on C. corymbosum. A secondary peak in the mx curve is observed for D. genutia feeding on C. annularium between days 52 and 54, caused by oviposition after surviving females were paired with an equal number of randomly selected males, following the death of all males by day 46. Despite the low survival rates of some insect populations, some individuals exhibit high reproductive rates in the adult stage, significantly influencing population growth. The lxmx curve, as a product of lx and mx, effectively reflects the contribution of adult D. genutia to the overall population growth.

3.3.3. Expected Lifespan of D. genutia

The age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) of D. genutia gradually declines with age (Figure 5). Life expectancy during the larval and pupal stages, as well as the overall highest life expectancy, is greater for individuals feeding on C. annularium compared to those feeding on C. corymbosum. However, life expectancy during the adult stage remains relatively consistent between the two host plants. A stabler slope of the exj curve indicates higher environmental suitability, with it approaching a straight line. The exj curves for D. genutia on both host plants initially decline, followed by a subsequent increase, reflecting increased mortality during the pre-adult stage, particularly pronounced during the larval stage. The exj curve for individuals feeding on C. corymbosum exhibits greater fluctuations during the pre-adult stage, signifying higher mortality compared to those feeding on C. annularium.

3.3.4. Reproductive Value of D. genutia

The reproductive values of D. genutia feeding on C. annularium and C. corymbosum reach their respective peaks at 24 days and 26 days (Figure 6). The maximum reproductive value for individuals feeding on C. corymbosum (v26,4 = 45.98) is slightly higher than for those feeding on C. annularium (v24,4 = 43.16). Female adults feeding on C. annularium exhibit a secondary peak in reproductive value on day 52, attributed to egg-laying resuming seven days after the death of male butterflies on day 46, following their replacement by randomly paired males in a 1:1 ratio. Analysis of Figure 3 further demonstrates that female adults do not die immediately after completing their egg-laying phase.

3.3.5. Life Table Parameters of D. genutia

Table 3 indicates that the intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), net reproduction rate (R0), and population doubling time (Td) of D. genutia feeding on both host plants do not show significant differences. However, the gross reproductive rate (GRR) and mean generation time (T) for individuals feeding on C. corymbosum (34.41, 29.03 d) are significantly lower than those feeding on C. annularium (60.92, 30.10 d). The intrinsic rate of increase (r) of both populations (0.092 d−1 and 0.074 d−1) are greater than 0, and the finite rate of increase (λ) (1.096 d−1 and 1.076 d−1) are greater than 1, indicating that D. genutia populations grow exponentially. These results suggest that both C. annularium and C. corymbosum are suitable host plants for supporting the population growth of D. genutia.

3.3.6. Population Prediction of D. genutia

Using age-stage, two-sex life table data and an initial population of 100 eggs, the population dynamics of D. genutia feeding on both host plants was simulated to predict changes over 60 days, revealing age-stage structure and growth trends. Populations feeding on both plants exhibited similar development rates, reaching their lowest numbers within the first 24 days and then increasing rapidly from day 25 onward. By day 60, the total population of D. genutia feeding on C. annularium (3.05 population units) was significantly higher than that of those feeding on C. corymbosum (2.68 population units) (Figure 7). Both populations reached the adult stage in the second generation and entered the egg and larval stages of the third generation by day 60, demonstrating overlapping generations. For populations feeding on C. annularium, the third generation’s eggs, larvae, and second-generation adults reached 2.79, 2.66, and 1.81 population units, respectively, while for populations feeding on C. corymbosum, these values were 2.48, 2.21, and 1.28 population units (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

In the life cycle of phytophagous insects, egg-laying and feeding behaviors are essential for reproduction and the maintenance of populations. These behaviors illustrate the mutual selection, influence, and adaptation between phytophagous insects and plants, as well as the mechanisms involved in insect community formation. To some extent, they determine the strategies used by phytophagous insects to exploit plants, which subsequently impacts the evolution and success of insect populations [33]. The co-evolution of phytophagous insects and plants has led to the development of specific feeding ranges. Phytophagous insects can distinguish between host and non-host plants and select suitable host plants for egg-laying and feeding [34]. Consequently, the choice of appropriate host plants is a significant biological behavior for phytophagous insects [35].
The “Preference-Performance Hypothesis” (PPH) suggests that the limited crawling ability of newly hatched larvae typically prompts female adults to choose host plants where offspring can survive and develop [36,37]. Chen Xiaoming and colleagues confirmed that A. curassavica is a host plant for the Yuanjiang D. genutia population [4], while Chen Zhen et al. observed that D. genutia female adults laid very few eggs on A. curassavica, and larvae did not feed on it [9]. In this study, the egg-laying rate on A. curassavica, which was only consumed by first-instar larvae, was 11.40%, with a feeding preference of 8.33%. This result does not fully align with the hypothesis and previous research. The discrepancy may arise from the fact that A. curassavica functions as both a host plant for larvae and a nectar source for adults. Adults and larvae are influenced by different sensory neurons and sensilla, which affect their behavior. The A. curassavica plants used were flowering individuals, and D. genutia adults did not completely follow the PPH in terms of egg-laying preference, but instead seemed to prioritize their own survival. Janz’s study on the egg-laying preferences and larval adaptability of Vanessa cardui on Cirsium arvense and Urtica dioica highlighted similar issues [38]. In outdoor large mating cages, female adults spent more time searching for host plants in nectar-rich areas, resulting in significantly higher egg-laying on host plants found within these areas. Other researchers have suggested that female adults may adapt their host-seeking strategies to optimize overall fecundity by focusing on nectar-rich regions, rather than risk failing to find the most suitable host plant [39,40].
While C. gigantea and D. volubilis were not consumed by larvae, female adults laid a few eggs on these plants, likely influenced by plant spacing. The process by which phytophagous insects locate host plants generally involves three stages: long-distance chemical searching, short-distance visual localization, and sensory recognition [41,42,43]. There may be some overlap between host and non-host plants, which could lead females to make inaccurate plant choices. However, newly hatched lepidopteran larvae do not passively accept these choices; they possess crawling abilities and can correct the errors made by female adults in plant selection [44]. As a result, even if adult females make incorrect egg-laying decisions in nature, it does not necessarily lead to a reduction in larval survival. The egg-laying rates on C. corymbosum and C. annularium were not significantly different, likely because these two plants are from the same genus and are closely related. They share numerous similar traits in morphology, physiology, ecological adaptations, and chemical composition. The host plant-seeking behavior of the adults made the differences in egg-laying preferences between these two plants less distinct [45,46].
Although D. genutia adults showed the same oviposition preference for C. corymbosum and C. annularium, more larvae preferred to feed on C. annularium, with significant differences in feeding preference observed in third- to fifth-instar larvae. Other research has shown that the feeding preferences of lepidopteran larvae do not always align with the egg-laying preferences of adults [36,47]. In the first and second instars, 23.33% and 10.00% of larvae, respectively, did not choose any plant for feeding, which could be attributed to the limited crawling ability of younger larvae and their restricted range of movement [48].
From the comprehensive analysis of adult egg-laying and larval feeding preferences, C. annularium and C. corymbosum were found to perform better and are also locally distributed in the Yuanjiang region. Therefore, these two plants were chosen as host plants for a near-natural experiment. Under near-natural conditions, a group-reared approach was used to create a two-sex life table and examine various parameters such as growth, development, survival, and reproduction across different stages of the Yuanjiang D. genutia population. The results indicated the developmental periods for Yuanjiang D. genutia were as follows: about 4 days for the egg stage, 8 days for the larval stage, and 6 days for the pupal stage. These durations were considerably shorter than those reported by Chen Zhen and colleagues [9], who studied D. genutia reared on C. otophyllum under greenhouse conditions in Kunming, Yunnan, China (16.5–36.4 °C, average 22.4 ± 3.1 °C). However, our results were closer to those of Chen Zhen’s study under constant 25 °C conditions with C. otophyllum and to Atluri et al.’s research [7] in Visakhapatnam, India, where D. genutia was reared on P. daemia at 28 ± 2 °C. The differences observed may be due to temperature effects [49] and possibly the experimental populations or host plants used. This study found that D. genutia reared on C. annularium had a shorter developmental period compared to those reared on C. corymbosum. The highest mortality occurred in the pre-adult stages, but D. genutia reared on C. annularium exhibited higher survival rates during the pre-adult phase. The sex ratios of adults emerging from the two host plants were 0.76 and 0.82, respectively. Female adults began laying eggs on day 24, with an average egg production per female of 63.44 and 60.36, respectively, consistent with the findings of Chen Zhen et al. [9]. D. genutia’s reproductive values on the two host plants peaked on day 24 and day 26 (43.16 and 45.98), with minimal differences in egg production per female (63.44 and 60.35, respectively). Moreover, D. genutia female adults did not die immediately after completing egg laying. Female adults feeding on C. annularium exhibit a secondary peak in reproductive value on day 52, attributed to egg laying resuming seven days after the death of male butterflies on day 46, following their replacement by randomly paired males in a 1:1 ratio. The spermatophores of male adults provide nutrients for female adults, enhancing their reproductive capacity; the spermatophores of unmated male adults provide more nutrients than those of male adults that have mated [50]. The gross reproductive rate and mean generation time of the D. genutia population reared on C. corymbosum were notably lower than those reared on C. annularium, but no significant differences were observed in the intrinsic rate of increase, finite rate of increase, net reproduction rate, and population doubling time. Additionally, the intrinsic rate of increase was greater than 0 and the finite rate of increase exceeded 1, indicating that the population of D. genutia in the Yuanjiang River Valley could still expand regardless of whether C. annularium or C. corymbosum was used as the host plant. In some lepidopteran species, adults engage in nectar feeding, and nutrient intake during the adult stage plays a crucial role in reproductive behavior [51]. Several studies have demonstrated that different nectar sources significantly influence adult lifespan and reproductive capacity [52,53]. In this experiment, the same type of nectar-rich plants was used to provide additional nutrition for the adults. The findings showed that D. genutia feeding on the two host plants performed similarly across all aspects of the adult stage. This suggests that the impact of host plants on adults may be less significant than that of nectar plants, although further research is necessary to confirm this hypothesis. Using the two-sex life table data, we simulated and projected the population dynamics of D. genutia for the next 60 days. The results indicated that the population growth of D. genutia feeding on C. annularium was faster than that of the population feeding on C. corymbosum, though their developmental rates were similar. By day 60, the third generation of both populations had entered the egg and larval stages.
The suitability of host plants for phytophagous insects includes both the egg-laying preference of adults and the feeding adaptability of larvae. The interaction between these factors is essential to the coevolution between phytophagous insects and their host plants [54]. Therefore, selecting appropriate host plants is vital for the population growth of D. genutia. Important indicators of host suitability include a higher survival rate and a shorter developmental period during the larval stage [55]. According to the results of this study, both C. annularium and C. corymbosum were evaluated comprehensively. The findings showed that both of these locally distributed plants in the Yuanjiang region are suitable for D. genutia, contributing to the population’s reproduction, with C. annularium being the more favorable host. In our an additional survey of D. genutia habitats, it was noted that C. annularium is a shrubby vine locally referred to as “sheep milk vegetable” due to its milky sap, primarily growing in thorny, barren slopes. C. corymbosum, an herbaceous vine, is typically found in riverbank shrubs, valley streams, and sparse, moist forests. Both plants offer medicinal and nutritional benefits [56,57], and excessive human harvesting has led to significant degradation, which may be a major factor contributing to the decline of the D. genutia population in the Yuanjiang River Valley.
Currently, individual rearing is a common approach for studying insect population life tables. While D. genutia adults exhibit scattered oviposition behavior and larvae display solitary habits, they do not live entirely independently in their natural environment. Individual rearing methods often fail to account for interactions and density effects among individuals, and many studies have highlighted the differences between individual and group rearing conditions [25,58]. Thus, the life table data generated through group rearing in a near-natural experimental population in this study provide a more accurate reflection of their natural characteristics. Some findings from experiments conducted in nylon net-covered enclosures may not align perfectly with natural conditions. For example, the absence of natural enemies could influence the survival of D. genutia, and the confined space within the enclosures, along with the physical position in the chamber of the plants selected, might not fully replicate the egg-laying behavior of female adults in the wild [59]. While the population dynamics observed in this study may not completely match real-world conditions, they still offer valuable insights for field-based conservation efforts concerning D. genutia populations.

5. Conclusions

C. annularium and C. corymbosum have been identified as local host plants for the D. genutia population in Yuanjiang. Both plants are capable of supporting the population’s growth after larval feeding. While differences were observed in the pre-adult stages between those feeding on the two host plants, adult performance was largely similar across both plants. Initial findings suggest that the influence of host plants on adults may be weaker than that of nectar plants, though additional research is needed. Based on a thorough evaluation from three experiments in this study, C. annularium is found to be more suitable for D. genutia than C. corymbosum. The excessive exploitation of host plants could be a significant factor contributing to the decline of the D. genutia population in the Yuanjiang River Valley.

Author Contributions

J.Y., C.Z. and L.S. conceived and designed the experiments; J.Y. and T.D. conducted the experiments; J.Y. and Y.L. analyzed the data and prepared the figures; C.Z. and L.S. obtained the funding for the study; J.Y. and C.Z. drafted the manuscript; J.Y., T.D., Y.L., C.Z. and L.S. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Special Research Funds for Basic Scientific Research of the State-level Public Welfare Scientific Research Institutes of the Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFYBB2021SY010); the Revitalize Yunnan Talent Support Program of Yunnan Province (Certificate number: YNWR-CYJS-2020-008); and the Science and Technology Department of Yunnan Province (202449CE340005).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the Yuanjiang Qian Zi Mei Butterfly Artificial Breeding Base, Yunnan Zhonglin Biological Resources Technology Co., Ltd., for providing the experimental site and facilities for this study. Special thanks to Professor Hsin Chi from National Chung Hsing University, for his thoughtful guidance and assistance with the use of the TWOSEX-MSChart software, and to Senior Engineer Wen Handong from Yuanjiang Dry-Hot Valley Ecological Station, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for plant identification in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, Y. Danaidae. Monograph of Chinese Butterflies (Revised Edition), 2nd ed.; Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House: Zhengzhou, China, 2000; pp. 270–271. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, J.; Ou, X.H.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Y.S.; Guo, C.C.; Liu, Q.; Li, S.Q.; Hu, S.H. Insect resource and diversity of Yuanjiang Nature Reserve in the Dry-hot valley of Yunnan. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in China, Changchun, China, 3–5 August 2006; pp. 337–346. [Google Scholar]
  3. Igarashi, S.; Fukuda, H. The Life Histories of Asian Butterflies; Tokai University Press: Tokyo, Japan, 2000; Volume 2, pp. 413–414. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, X.M.; Zhou, C.L.; Shi, J.Y.; Shi, L.; Yi, C.H. Ornamental Butterflies in China; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2008; pp. 43, 209–210. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, C.L. Yunnan Butterfly; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1995; p. 77. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shi, J.Y.; Wang, M.X.; Yao, J.; Pu, Z.Y.; Shi, R.H.; Lei, P. Design, Construction and Management of Butterfly Garden, 1st ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2013; p. 492. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atluri, J.B.; Rayalu, M.B.; Deepika, D.S. Life history and larval performance of the common tiger butterfly, Danaus genutia Cramer (Lepidoptera; Rhopalocera; Danaidae). Bioscan 2010, 5, 511–515. [Google Scholar]
  8. Meyer, C.E. Notes on the life history of Danaus genutia alexis (Waterhouse and Lyell) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Aust. Entomol. 1995, 22, 137–139. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Z.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Zhou, C.L.; Chen, X.M.; Shi, L. Biological characteristics of an experimental population of the common tiger butterfly, Danaus genutia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 54, 279–291. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pearl, R.; Parker, S.L. Experimental studies on the duration of life. I. Introductory discussion of the duration of life in Drosophila. Am. Nat. 1921, 55, 481–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morris, R.F.; Miller, C.A. The development of life tables for the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 1954, 32, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, Y.B.; Chi, H. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)(Diptera: Tephritidae) with a discussion on the problem of applying female age-specific life tables to insect populations. Insect Sci. 2012, 19, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chi, H.; You, M.S.; Atlıha, R.; Smith, C.L.; Kavousi, A.; Salih, M.; Özgökçe, A.G.; Tuan, S.J.; Fu, J.W.; Xu, Y.Y.; et al. Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table: An Introduction to Theory, Data Analysis, and Application. Entomol. Gen. 2020, 40, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chi, H.; Fu, J.W.; You, M.S. Age-stage, two-sex life table and its application in population ecology and integrated pest management. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2019, 62, 255–262. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma, M.; Ren, F.X.; Wang, Y.; Kong, W.N.; Wei, M.F.; Chi, H.; Özgökçe, M.S.; Ma, R.Y. Group-reared life table: Rationales of data analysis and methods of converting to individually-reared life table. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2024, 67, 1147–1162. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cui, J.; Yin, J.X.; Tian, X.Y.; Gao, Y.; Shi, S.S.; Li, W.B. Age–Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis of Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae) Across Different Soybean Varieties. Insects 2024, 15, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, M.N.; Peng, Z.K.; Guo, C.S.; Xiao, Y.; Yin, F.; Yuan, H.B.; Li, Z.Y.; Zalucki, M.P. Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Tables of Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) and Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom) on Different Bean Pods Under Laboratory Conditions: Implications for Their Competitive Interactions. Insects 2024, 15, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Q. Adaptive mechanisms of Locusta migratoria to Four Different Plants. Ph.D. Dissertation, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, X.S.; Zhang, Y.L.; Luo, Y.Q.; Settele, J. Studies on life history, life table, habitat and conservation of Byasa impediens (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Acta Ecol. Sin. 2006, 26, 3184–3197. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, R.L.; Cai, W.J.; Yang, H.; Gu, M.B. The study on life table of Cethosia cyane cyane (Drury) experimental population. J. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 37, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liao, H.J.; Liu, W.F.; Du, T.; Shi, L.; Zhou, C.L.; Deng, J. Effects of host plants on oviposition selectivity and population fitness of Euploea core Cramer. Biot. Resour. 2017, 39, 345–351. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang, T.; Fan, C.L.; Wang, T.T.; Wang, X.Y.; Xu, D.Y.; Jiang, Z.E.; Yang, Z.Q.; Tan, D.J.; Lu, Y.C. Feeding and oviposition preferences of Diaphania caesalis Walker on different plants. Plant Prot. 2024, 50, 211–218. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jermy, T.; Hanson, F.E.; Dethier, V.G. Induction of specific food preferences in lepidopterous larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1968, 11, 211–230. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tang, Q.B.; Wang, C.Z. Leaf disc test used in caterpillar feeding preference study. Chin. Bull. Entomol. 2007, 4, 912–915. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, X.H.; Wang, D.J.; Lei, Z.R.; Wang, H.H. Comparison of Life Tables for Experimental Populations of Individual-Rearing and Group-Rearing Frankliniella occidentalis. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2021, 54, 959–968. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, W.Q.; Zheng, Y.Q.; Chen, B.; Phangthavong, S.; Xiao, G.L. Effects of different host plants on the growth, development and fecundity of potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella based on the age-stage two-sex life table. J. Plant Prot. 2020, 47, 488–496. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Ntomology 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chang, C.; Huang, C.Y.; Dai, S.M.; Atlihan, R.; Chi, H. Genetically engineered ricin suppresses Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on demographic analysis of group-reared life table. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 987–992. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Chi, H. TWOSEX-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis. 2024. Available online: https://www.faas.cn/cms/pages/810640950322870004/attachments/Twosex-MSChart.rar (accessed on 14 August 2024).
  31. Li, J.Y.; Chen, Y.T.; Fu, J.W.; Shi, M.Z.; Chi, H.; You, M.S. Application of the bootstrap technique and the multinomial theorem in the research of age-stage, two-sex life table. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2022, 65, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chi, H. TIMING-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Population Projection Based on Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table. 2024. Available online: https://www.faas.cn/cms/pages/810640950555190004/attachments/TIMING-MSChart.rar (accessed on 14 August 2024).
  33. Tang, Y.C.; Zhou, C.L.; Chen, X.M. Progress in the Oviposition Behavioral Ecology of Herbivorous Insects. For. Res. 2010, 23, 770–777. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lian, W.; Ma, Y.H.; Chen, L.H.; Wei, H.Y. Research Progress in the Influence of Host Plants on the Selection Behaviors of Herbivorous Insects. Biol. Disaster Sci. 2022, 45, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wu, K.M. Host plant selection mechanisms and behavioural manipulation strategies of phytophagous insects. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2008, 28, 5113–5122. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gripenberg, S.; Mayhew, P.J.; Parnell, M.; Roslin, T. A meta-analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13, 383–393. [Google Scholar]
  37. Menacer, K.; Cortesero, A.M.; Hervé, M.R. Challenging the preference–performance hypothesis in an above-belowground insect. Oecologia 2021, 197, 179–187. [Google Scholar]
  38. Janz, N. The relationship between habitat selection and preference for adult and larval food resources in the polyphagous butterfly Vanessa cardui (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Insect Behav. 2005, 18, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boggs, C.L.; Ross, C.L. The effect of adult food limitation on life-history traits in Speyeria mormonia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Ecology 1993, 74, 433–441. [Google Scholar]
  40. Scheirs, J.; Bruyn, L.D.; Verhagen, R. Optimization of adult performance determines host choice in a grass miner. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2000, 267, 2065–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, Q.H.; Ji, L.Z. Chemical ecology of oviposition of herbivorous insects. Chin. J. Ecol. 1994, 13, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  42. Renwick, J.A.A.; Chew, F.S. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1994, 39, 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rausher, M.D. Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in three related butterflies. Ecology 1979, 60, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sadek, M.M. Complementary behaviors of maternal and offspring Spodoptera littoralis: Oviposition site selection and larval movement together maximize performance. J. Insect Behav. 2011, 24, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Janz, N.; Nylin, S. Butterflies and plants: A phylogenetic study. Evolution 1998, 52, 486–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, M.N. Larval Diet Selection of the Rare Butterfly of Teinopalpus aureus and Genetic Diversity of Two Magnoliaceae Hostplants. Master’s Thesis, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  47. Shikano, I.; Akhtar, Y.; Isman, M.B. Relationship between adult and larval host plant selection and larval performance in the generalist moth, Trichoplusia ni. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2010, 4, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, J.J.; Yuan, G.H.; Li, Y.Y.; Guo, X.R.; Wang, Q.; Guo, S.S.; Li, W.Z. Associative learning in early-instar larvae of Helicoverpa armigera in response to several floral volatiles. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 4204–4210. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen, Z.; Zhou, C.L.; Chen, X.M.; Shi, L. Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on the Development of Immature Stages of Danaus genutia. Sichuan J. Zool. 2018, 37, 420–425. [Google Scholar]
  50. Watanabe, M.; Sato, K. A spermatophore structured in the bursa copulatrix of the small white Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) during copulation, and its sugar content. J. Res. Lepid. 1993, 32, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boggs, C.L. Reproductive strategies of female butterflies: Variation in and constraints on fecundity. Ecol. Entomol. 1986, 11, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kong, H.L.; Liang, X.C.; Luo, Y.Z. Effects of Supplementary Nutriments on the Egg Maturation and the Longevity of the Male Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio xuthus Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. 2008, 23, 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang, X.J.; Li, S.; Li, W.Z.; Sheng, Z.Y.; Gao, C.N.; Zhang, S.H.; Yuan, G.H. Effect of different nectar mimics on reproduction of Helicoverpa armigera moths. In Proceedings of the 2020 Central China Insect Academic Symposium, Nanchang, China, 1 October 2020; pp. 295–304. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gratton, C.; Welter, S.C. Oviposition preference and larval performance of Liriomyza helianthi (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on normal and novel host plants. Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27, 926–935. [Google Scholar]
  55. Juárez, M.L.; Schöfl, G.; Vera, M.T.; Vilardi, J.C.; Murúa, M.G.; Willink, E.; Hänniger, S.; Heckel, D.G.; Groot, A.T. Population structure of Spodoptera frugiperda maize and rice host forms in S outh A merica: Are they host strains? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2014, 152, 182–199. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, H.; Qin, Y.; Yuan, X.M. Investigation on the traditional production techniques of Yangnai pickled vegetables in Jianshui County. Rural. Econ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 29, 105–106. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, Y.Y.; Li, H.L.; Li, J.Y.; Bai, Y.Y.; Yan, G.Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, T.; You, J.P. Study on Pharmacognosy of Yao Medicine Cynanchum Corymbosum Wight. Asia-Pac. Tradit. Med. 2024, 20, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gibbs, M.; Lace, L.A.; Jones, M.J.; Moore, A.J. Intraspecific competition in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria: Effect of rearing density and gender on larval life history. J. Insect Sci. 2004, 4, 16. [Google Scholar]
  59. Martin, L.A.; Pullin, A.S. Host-plant specialisation and habitat restriction in an endangered insect, Lycaena dispar batavus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) I. Larval feeding and oviposition preferences. Eur. J. Entomol. 2004, 101, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental setup for evaluating Danaus genutia oviposition preference among six host plants (documented, local, and non-host) under naturally fluctuating room temperatures. 40-mesh silver-gray netted room (10 m × 8 m × 6.5 m) with 20 pairs of 4–6-day-old adults and 2 × 3 plant layout (2 m spacing) with Lantana camara nectar supplementation.
Figure 1. Experimental setup for evaluating Danaus genutia oviposition preference among six host plants (documented, local, and non-host) under naturally fluctuating room temperatures. 40-mesh silver-gray netted room (10 m × 8 m × 6.5 m) with 20 pairs of 4–6-day-old adults and 2 × 3 plant layout (2 m spacing) with Lantana camara nectar supplementation.
Insects 16 00368 g001
Figure 2. Feeding preference performance of D. genutia 1st–5th larvae. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant differences (p ≥ 0.05). The bar values represent standard errors (SDs).
Figure 2. Feeding preference performance of D. genutia 1st–5th larvae. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant differences (p ≥ 0.05). The bar values represent standard errors (SDs).
Insects 16 00368 g002
Figure 3. Age-stage-specific survival rate (Sxj) of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Figure 3. Age-stage-specific survival rate (Sxj) of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Insects 16 00368 g003
Figure 4. Population survival rate and fecundity of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants. lx: population survival rate; fx4: female fecundity; mx: population fecundity; lxmx: population net maternities.
Figure 4. Population survival rate and fecundity of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants. lx: population survival rate; fx4: female fecundity; mx: population fecundity; lxmx: population net maternities.
Insects 16 00368 g004
Figure 5. Age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Figure 5. Age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Insects 16 00368 g005
Figure 6. Age-stage-specific reproductive values (vxj) of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Figure 6. Age-stage-specific reproductive values (vxj) of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Insects 16 00368 g006
Figure 7. Population projection of D. genutia feeding on different host plants (total population size).
Figure 7. Population projection of D. genutia feeding on different host plants (total population size).
Insects 16 00368 g007
Figure 8. Population projection of D. genutia feeding on different host plants (stage-wise population size).
Figure 8. Population projection of D. genutia feeding on different host plants (stage-wise population size).
Insects 16 00368 g008
Table 1. Oviposition preference of D. genutia adults on different plants.
Table 1. Oviposition preference of D. genutia adults on different plants.
PlantEggs Received per DayPercentage of Eggs on the Plant
Cynanchum annularium97.56 ± 8.70 a31.48 ± 3.21 a
Cynanchum corymbosum105.78 ± 7.65 a34.09 ± 2.01 a
Cynanchum rostellatum57.78 ± 6.52 b18.62 ± 2.00 b
Asclepias curassavica35.33 ± 2.40 c11.40 ± 0.87 c
Dregea volubilis3.55 ± 1.57 d1.14 ± 0.50 d
Calotropis gigantea10.11 ± 4.02 d3.26 ± 1.26 d
Note: Eggs received per day met normality and homogeneity of variance, and one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test was used. Kruskal–Wallis tests and Dunn’s test were applied to the analysis of the percentage of eggs on the plant. Data are presented as means ± standard errors (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in post hoc comparisons (p < 0.05).
Table 2. The population parameters of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Table 2. The population parameters of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
ParametersHost Plant
nCynanchum annulariumnCynanchum corymbosump
Egg period (d)874.13 ± 0.04 a724.06 ± 0.03 a0.11
Larval period (d)658.18 ± 0.05 a448.64 ± 0.08 b0.00 *
Pupal period (d)586.05 ± 0.07 a315.97 ± 0.14 a0.60
Pre-adult period (d)5818.43 ± 0.08 a3118.87 ± 0.16 b0.01 *
Pre-adult survival rate1000.58 ± 0.05 a1000.31 ± 0.05 b0.01 *
Adult longevity (d)5817.57 ± 1.05 a3118.74 ± 1.48 a0.52
Female adult longevity (d)2520.96 ± 2.03 a1415.00 ± 1.53 b0.02 *
Male adult longevity (d)3315.00 ± 0.79 a1721.82 ± 2.14 b0.00 *
Sex ratio (Nf/Nm)1000.76 ± 0.21 a1000.82 ± 0.35 a0.79
Number of eggs per female 2563.44 ± 5.95 a1460.35 ± 7.99 a0.76
Data are mean ± SE. Standard errors were estimated using 100,000 bootstrap resampling. The paired bootstrap test was used to detect the differences between different host plants. Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (*: p < 0.05).
Table 3. Life table parameters of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
Table 3. Life table parameters of D. genutia feeding on two different host plants.
ParameterHost Plant
nCynanchum annulariumnCynanchum corymbosump
Gross reproductive rate (GRR)10060.92 ± 8.24 a10034.41 ± 8.45 b0.04 *
Intrinsic rate of increase (r)/d−11000.092 ± 0.007 a1000.074 ± 0.010 a0.11
Finite rate of increase (λ)/d−11001.096 ± 0.007 a1001.076 ± 0.011 a0.11
Net reproduction rate (R0)10015.86 ± 3.12 a1008.45 ± 2.36 a0.06
Mean generation time (T)/d10030.10 ± 0.30 a10029.03 ± 0.28 b0.01 *
Doubling time (Td)/d1007.54 ± 0.59 a1009.43 ± 2.08 a0.14
Data are mean ± SE. Standard errors were estimated using 100,000 bootstrap resampling. The paired bootstrap test was used to detect the differences between different host plants. Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (*: p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, J.; Du, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Shi, L. Adaptability of Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia to Different Host Plants in Yunan. Insects 2025, 16, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040368

AMA Style

Yao J, Du T, Li Y, Zhou C, Shi L. Adaptability of Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia to Different Host Plants in Yunan. Insects. 2025; 16(4):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Jun, Ting Du, Yangyang Li, Chengli Zhou, and Lei Shi. 2025. "Adaptability of Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia to Different Host Plants in Yunan" Insects 16, no. 4: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040368

APA Style

Yao, J., Du, T., Li, Y., Zhou, C., & Shi, L. (2025). Adaptability of Yuanjiang River Valley Danaus genutia to Different Host Plants in Yunan. Insects, 16(4), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop