Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigation as a Quarantine Treatment for the Control of Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in Wood
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fumigant, Insect, and Wood
2.2. Sulfuryl Fluoride Concentration and Determination of Ct (Concentration Time) Product
2.3. Efficacy of SF for the Fumigation of Reticulitermes speratus in Laboratory Trials
2.4. Sulfuryl Fluoride Sorption with Different Loading Ratios of Dry and Wet Wood
2.5. Penetration Tests Based on R. speratus Mortality in Wooden Cubes
2.6. Scale-Up (0.5 m3) Fumigation Using SF on R. speratus
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Efficacy of SF on Reticulitermes speratus in Laboratory Trials
3.2. Sulfuryl Fluoride Sorption with Various Loading Ratios for Dry and Wet Wood
3.3. Penetration Test Based on Reticulitermes speratus Mortality in a Wooden Cube
3.4. Scaled-Up Fumigation Using Sulfuryl Fluoride on Reticulitermes speratus
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, X.; Wheeler, M.M.; Oi, F.M.; Scharf, M.E. Inhibition of termite cellulases by carbohydrate-based cellulase inhibitors: Evidence from in vitro biochemistry and in vivo feeding studies. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2008, 90, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, S.-M.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.-G.; Shin, C.-H.; Shin, S.-C.; Park, I.-K. Fumigant antitermitic activity of plant essential oils and components from ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi), allspice (Pimenta dioica), caraway (Carum carvi), dill (Anethum graveolens), geranium (Pelargonium graveolens), and litsea (Litsea cubeba) oils against Japanese termite (Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6596–6602. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- JoongAngIlBo. A Termite, ‘Wooden Building Killer’, Attacks. Available online: https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25199381 (accessed on 15 April 2024).
- DongAIlBo. ‘Termites’ That Destroy Houses Appear in Gangnam?… “If True, It’s Serious.”. Available online: https://www.donga.com/news/Society/article/all/20230518/119365380/2 (accessed on 15 April 2024).
- Kim, S.-H.; Chung, Y.-J. Analysis of factors affecting termite damage to wooden architectural heritage buildings in Korea. Forests 2022, 13, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, S.-M.; Kim, J.; Kang, J.; Koh, S.-H.; Ahn, Y.-J.; Kang, K.-S.; Park, I.-K. Fumigant toxicity and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of 4 Asteraceae plant essential oils and their constituents against Japanese termite (Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 113, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, N.-Y. Novel technologies for subterranean termite control. Sociobiology 2002, 40, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
- APQA. Phytosanitary Disinfestation Guidelines. Available online: http://www.qia.go.kr/plant/disinpect/listXdclbzWebAction.do (accessed on 28 March 2024).
- APQA. Domestic and International Trends in Disinfection Research. Available online: https://www.qia.go.kr/plant/disinpect/plant_sterilize_study.jsp (accessed on 28 March 2024).
- Unep. Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 12th ed.; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2018; p. 918. [Google Scholar]
- IPPC. Recommendation on: Replacement or Reduction of the Use of Methyl Bromide as a Phytosanitary Measure; IPPC: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, J.; Cha, W.; Park, M.-G. Evaluation of the effect of photoplethysmograms on workers’ exposure to methyl bromide using second derivative. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1224143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, J.; Hong, Y.-S.; Cha, W.; Mo, H.-h.; Park, M.-G. Heart rate variability analysis in workers exposed to methyl bromide as a quarantine treatment. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021, 63, e32–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.-G.; Choi, J.; Hong, Y.-S.; Park, C.G.; Kim, B.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Lim, H.-J.; Mo, H.-h.; Lim, E.; Cha, W. Negative effect of methyl bromide fumigation work on the central nervous system. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.; Kim, K.W.; Park, M.-G.; Roh, G.-H.; Cha, D.H.; Lee, B.-H. New feasible quarantine disinfestation using ethyl formate for termites and ants on imported lumber. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2021, 24, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, K.-S.; Kim, H.K.; Lee, B.-H.; Kim, B.-S.; Yang, J.-H.; Koo, H.-N.; Kim, G.-H. Fumigant toxicity of phosphine to the Japanese termite, Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2014, 57, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.; Sung, B.; Hong, K.; Lee, B.; Ren, Y. The efficacy of ethanedinitrile to control wood related insect pests. In Proceedings of the 2005 Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, CA, USA, 3–6 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Jeon, J.-C.; Kim, H.-K.; Koo, H.-N.; Kim, B.-S.; Yang, J.-O.; Kim, G.-H. Synergistic Effect of Cold Treatment Combined with Ethyl Formate Fumigation against Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Insects 2022, 13, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- APQA. Efforts to Develop and Expand Use of Methyl Bromide (MB) Substitutes. Available online: https://www.qia.go.kr/viewwebQiaCom.do?id=56555&type=6_18_1bdsm (accessed on 12 February 2024).
- Su, N.-Y.; Scheffrahn, R.H. Field comparison of sulfuryl fluoride susceptibility among three termite species (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae) during structural fumigation. J. Econ. Entomol. 1986, 79, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mühle, J.; Huang, J.; Weiss, R.; Prinn, R.; Miller, B.; Salameh, P.; Harth, C.; Fraser, P.; Porter, L.; Greally, B. Sulfuryl fluoride in the global atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114, D05306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barak, A.V.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, G.; Wu, Y.; Xu, L.; Huang, Q. Sulfuryl fluoride as a quarantine treatment for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in regulated wood packing material. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 1628–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IPPC. Phytosanitary Treatments for Regulated Pests; ISPM 28; FAO/IPPC: Rome, Italy, 2007; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Y.L.; Lee, B.H.; Padovan, B. Penetration of methyl bromide, sulfuryl fluoride, ethanedinitrile and phosphine into timber blocks and the sorption rate of the fumigants. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.-G.; Ren, Y.L.; Lee, B.-H. Preliminary study to evaluate ethanedinitrile (C2 N2) for quarantine treatment of four wood destroying pests. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 5213–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Don-Pedro, K. Mode of action of fixed oils against eggs of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Pestic. Sci. 1989, 26, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajendran, S. Alternatives to methyl bromide as fumigants for stored food commodities. Pestic. Outlook 2001, 12, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
- NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards: Sulfury Fluoride. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0581.html (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- Osbrink, W.L.; Scheffrahn, R.H.; Su, N.-Y.; Rust, M.K. Laboratory comparisons of sulfuryl fluoride toxicity and mean time of mortality among ten termite species (Isoptera: Hodotermitidae, Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1987, 80, 1044–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.-G.; Park, C.-G.; Yang, J.-O.; Kim, G.-H.; Ren, Y.; Lee, B.-H.; Cha, D.H. Ethyl Formate as a Methyl Bromide Alternative for Phytosanitary Disinfestation of Imported Banana in Korea with Logistical Considerations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.-H.; Hong, K.-J.; Park, M.-G. The Efficacy, Phytotoxicity, and Safety of Liquid Ethyl Formate Used to Control the Grape (Campbell Early) Quarantine Pest Pseudococcus comstocki. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.-G.; Lee, B.-H.; Yang, J.-O.; Kim, B.-S.; Roh, G.H.; Kendra, P.E.; Cha, D.H. Ethyl Formate as a Methyl Bromide Alternative for Fumigation of Citrus: Efficacy, Fruit Quality, and Workplace Safety. J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 2290–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwon, T.-H.; Cho, J.-H.; Kim, D.-B.; Kwon, G.-M.; Hong, K.-J.; Ren, Y.; Lee, B.-H.; Park, M.-G. Ethyl Formate Fumigation for Control of the Scale Insect Asiacornococcus kaki, a Quarantine Pest on Sweet Persimmon, Diospyros kaki: Efficacy, Phytotoxicity and Safety. Insects 2023, 14, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barreau, T.; Hoshiko, S.; Kreutzer, R.; Smorodinsky, S.; Talarico, J. Sulfuryl fluoride poisonings in structural fumigation, a highly regulated industry—Potential causes and solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Temp (°C) | No. of Termites | LCt50 a (95% CI, mg h/L) | LCt99 a (95% CI, mg h/L) | SE b | df c | X2 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23 | 418 | 30.87 (29.65–32.02) | 42.53 (39.71–47.49) | 16.7 2.1 | 25 | 63.61 |
5 | 480 | 151.62 (140.78–162.90) | 401.9 (343.69–499.79) | 5.5 0.5 | 25 | 120.8 |
Temp (°C) | Loading Ratio (v/v %) | Ct Products (mg h/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dry | Wet * | p | ||
23 | 10 | 665.74 ± 5.89 | 712.90 ± 20.95 | 0.214 |
30 | 692.68 ± 40.96 | 743.16 ± 6.04 | 0.387 | |
50 | 732.25 ± 13.96 | 757.34 ± 26.50 | 0.339 | |
p | 0.250 | 0.336 | ||
F | 1.761 | 1.313 | ||
5 | 10 | 900.05 ± 38.78 | 781.23 ± 38.76a | 0.081 |
30 | 880.84 ± 5.13 | 779.23 ± 28.46ab | 0.094 | |
50 | 805.57 ± 42.36 | 985.32 ± 61.68ac | 0.202 | |
p | 0.187 | 0.028 | ||
F | 2.250 | 6.877 |
No. of Termites | LCt50 a (95% CI, mg h/L) | LCt99 a (95% CI, mg h/L) | SE b | df c | X2 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
540 | 31.59 (30.47–32.70) | 53.34 (49.22–59.63) | 0.91 | 22 | 127.2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, S.-Y.; Choi, N.-R.; Park, M.-G. Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigation as a Quarantine Treatment for the Control of Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in Wood. Insects 2024, 15, 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060379
Kim S-Y, Choi N-R, Park M-G. Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigation as a Quarantine Treatment for the Control of Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in Wood. Insects. 2024; 15(6):379. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060379
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, So-Yeon, Na-Ra Choi, and Min-Goo Park. 2024. "Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigation as a Quarantine Treatment for the Control of Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in Wood" Insects 15, no. 6: 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060379