Next Article in Journal
First Morpho-Functional Assessment of Immature Stages of Pelecocera Species (Diptera: Syrphidae) Feeding on False Truffles
Previous Article in Journal
Pentastiridius leporinus (Linnaeus, 1761) as a Vector of Phloem-Restricted Pathogens on Potatoes: ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Various Nectar and Pollen Plants on the Survival, Reproduction, and Predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus

1
Key Laboratory of Oasis Agricultural Pest Management and Plant Protection Resources Utilization, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(3), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15030190
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 11 March 2024 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 / Published: 13 March 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Floral resources have been increasingly utilized in conservation-based biological control to support the natural enemies of insect pests or pest mites. The native predatory mite Neoseiulus bicaudus, found in Xinjiang, plays a crucial role in the integrated pest management of agricultural crops. The aim of this experiment was to compare the impacts of floral resources on the longevity, fecundity, and predation ability of N. bicaudus. Finally, a comparative analysis of the adaptation of eight nectar and pollen plants to N. bicaudus was performed, as well as further investigation into the effect of pollen from these nectar and pollen plants on the predation ability of predatory mites. The obtained results have significant implications for the utilization of nectar and pollen plants for eco-friendly pest mite control in farmland.

Abstract

Neoseiulus bicaudus is a predatory mite species that could potentially be used for the biological control of spider mites and thrips. Floral resources can provide excellent habitats and abundant nutrients for natural enemies. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of eight floral resources on the longevity, fecundity, and predation ability of N. bicaudus. Among the considered plants, Cnidium monnieri led to the highest longevity (24 days) and fecundity (13.8 eggs) of N. bicaudus, while Tagetes erecta resulted in the lowest longevity (7 days) and fecundity (0.1 eggs) observed in the predatory mites. By comparing the effects of three nectar and pollen plants on the predation of predatory mites, it was observed that N. bicaudus still exhibited a type II functional response to Tetranychus turkestani. In the presence of pollen, the predation efficacy (a/Th) of N. bicaudus exhibited a lower value, compared to that in the absence of pollen (Control: a/Th = 24.00). When pollen was supplied, the maximum consumption (1/Th) of predatory mites was higher than in its absence (Control: 1/Th = 9.90 d−1), with the highest value obtained in the presence of B. officinalis pollen (B. officinalis: 1/Th = 17.86 d−1). The influence coefficient of predation of N. bicaudus on T. turkestani in the presence of pollen was compared in the presence of three nectar and pollen plants: Cnidium monnieri, Centaurea cyanus, and Borago officinalis. At low prey densities, the influence coefficient of C. cyanus exceeded that of B. officinalis, and the overall influence coefficient values were negative (i.e., the presence of pollen reduced predatory mite feeding on T. turkestani). They exhibited similar values at high prey densities, and all of the influence coefficient values were close to 0 (i.e., the presence of pollen had no effect on predatory mite feeding on T. turkestani). The findings revealed that diverse plant species exert differential impacts on N. bicaudus, with some influencing its lifespan and others affecting its reproductive capabilities. Furthermore, the presence of nectar and pollen plants had a significant impact on predatory mite feeding on T. turkestani at low prey densities; however, this effect diminished as the prey density increased. Therefore, we recommend planting C. monnieri, C. cyanus, and B. officinalis in the field to ensure an ample population of predatory mites. The obtained results hold significant implications for the utilization of nectar and pollen plants in eco-friendly pest management strategies within agricultural contexts.

1. Introduction

In agro-ecosystems, predatory and parasitic natural enemies are a valuable biological control resource for major pests; however, optimizing their effective control often requires additional resources [1]. The “Predator-in-First” (PIF) strategy aims to enhance the abundance of natural enemies by capitalizing on their broad dietary preferences and ability to sustain and reproduce using the resources provided by plants in the absence of pest organisms. This strategy can be considered as an agro-ecosystem management technique that utilizes functionally attractive plants to serve as resource reservoirs supporting natural enemies [2,3,4]. Functional plants refer to a category of plant species that possesses the ability to perform essential ecological functions within agricultural and forestry ecosystems. In recent years, nectar and pollen plants—as a specific type of functional plant—have garnered significant attention and interest [5,6]. These plants may serve as a source of pollen and nectar for prey, while simultaneously providing alternative food and shelter for natural enemy insects or pollinators [7].
In nature, there exists a diverse array of over 200,000 species of flowering plants, which serve as exceptional habitats and sources of abundant nutrients for natural enemies [8]. In situations where the targeted prey is absent or scarce, these natural enemies can sustain themselves by consuming pollen or nectar from alternative plant sources, which are frequently limited in agricultural systems [9]. The presence of flowering plants ensures the availability of essential resources to sustain natural enemy populations throughout the entire duration of the season [10]. Parasitoids have been documented to derive benefits from a diverse range of nectar and pollen plants, such as those in the Polygonaceae, Umbelliferae, Cruciferae, Boraginaceae, Solanaceae, and Rosaceae families. These plant species are frequently selected as nectar resources in field studies, due to their ability to extend the lifespan of parasitoids [11]. Furthermore, studies on the effects of integrated traits have revealed that plants exhibiting a compound umbel or raceme inflorescence form and shallow corolla have the highest impact on parasitoid longevity [12]. Similar to parasitoids, hoverflies are strictly dependent on floral resources during their adult stage. For instance, the presence of Lobularia maritima attracts hoverflies, thereby enhancing their abundance and contributing to pest population reduction [13]. Malva sylvestris can serve as a valuable floral resource for hoverflies due to its high glycogen content, with its nectar playing a crucial role in promoting the proliferation of hoverfly populations [14,15]. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that predatory arthropods, such as ladybeetles and spiders, exhibit omnivorous feeding behaviors [16,17]. The inclusion of pollen and nectar significantly influenced their longevity, particularly in situations where the availability of prey was limited. The presence of Perilla frutescens flowers mixed with prey positively influenced the survival and early reproductive success of Harmonia axyridis [18,19]. In addition, members of the Miridae family also feed on pollen and nectar when prey is scarce; for example, it has been found that Sesamum indicum is ideally suited for planting on the edges of rice paddies to promote the biological control of rice pests by Cyrtorhinus lividipennis [20].
The Phytoseiidae family, commonly employed as biological control agents, comprises numerous omnivorous species that rely on both prey and floral resources, such as pollen and nectar, for their survival [21,22]. The oviposition of female adult mites has been found to be enhanced, likely due to the provision of pollen as a source of proteins and amino acids, thereby augmenting the fecundity of the predatory mites [23,24,25]. For instance, Viburnum tinus can provide pollen and oviposition sites for Neoseiulus californicus, thereby increasing the fecundity of this predatory mite [10]. When N. californicus consumed pistachio pollen, its fecundity was significantly enhanced [26]. Significant variations in the longevity and population parameters of predatory mites have been observed across different pollen types [27]. A number of scholars have conducted comparative analyses of the nutritional composition of pollen from Prunus amygdalis, Zea mays, and Helianthus annuus. They highlighted that variations in protein, lipid, and carbohydrate content among these pollens significantly influence the developmental timeline and reproductive capabilities of predatory mites [28]. Thus, the identification of suitable nectar and pollen plants is beneficial for the maintenance of predatory mite populations in agricultural fields.
The predatory mite Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) has a wide distribution across several countries, encompassing Russia, Greece, Iran, Spain, Italy, Tajikistan, Cyprus, and the United States [29,30,31]. It is a facultative predator with generalist feeding habits, capable of regulating the populations of various pest species including spider mites, whiteflies, and thrips [32,33]. N. bicaudus has demonstrated effective control against low densities of Tetranychus turkestani on bean and cotton crops [34,35]. However, the prophylactic release of predatory mites is prone to escape or mortality due to insufficient food availability. Therefore, improving the resilience of released predatory mites is worth considering in order to achieve efficient and sustainable pest management [36].
Nectar and pollen plants can create suitable habitats for predatory mites, thereby enhancing their presence in agro-ecological environments and facilitating long-term pest control. For this study, we selected eight economically valuable nectar and pollen plant species that are cultivable in Xinjiang for screening purposes [37]. Cnidium monnieri (Umbelliferae) has a compound umbellate inflorescence that blooms from May to July. It has a distinctive fragrance, possesses ornamental properties, and can serve as a functional plant for corn, cotton, and other crops. Furthermore, it is a Chinese herbal medicine [38]. Tagetes erecta and Centaurea cyanus are herbaceous plants belonging to the Asteraceae family, having flowering periods from July to September and from April to May, respectively. The nectar they produce serves as a resource for crop pest predators and parasitic wasps. Additionally, both of these plants possess medicinal properties [39]. The annual herb Borago officinalis (Boraginaceae) exhibits cymes, blooming from May to October and yielding fruit from July to November. The flower possesses an ample amount of pollen, thus serving as a readily available protein source for insects [40]. Interestingly, B. officinalis also has a variety of edible, medicinal, ornamental, and cosmetic properties. In addition, the selection of Brassica napus and L. maritima (as plants in the family Brassicaceae) in this study is justified by their significant economic and ornamental value [41,42]. Capsicum annuum and Medicago sativa, which have the potential to serve as biological control agents, were selected as test plants [43,44]. M. sativa has a high nutritional value and is commonly used as the primary feed for livestock. C. annuum can be processed into food and spices, and is also used as a raw material in medicine, the chemical industry, and so on.
The availability of abundant pollen and nectar resources from nectar and pollen plants can positively influence the conservation of predatory mites. This phenomenon may preventively establish predatory mite populations before a target pest infests crops, thereby facilitating their colonization in the field and enhancing pest control efficiency. Consequently, this approach effectively mitigates the release of predatory mites, minimizes ecological risks, and addresses the limitations associated with conventional biological control [45]. Our objectives were to (1) assess the conservation role of nectar and pollen plants with respect to N. bicaudus and (2) evaluate the impact of pollen on T. turkestani predation by predatory mites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Cultures

Eight species of plants were tested: C. monnieri (Umbelliferae), L. maritima (Brassicaceae), T. erecta (Asteraceae), C. cyanus (Asteraceae), B. officinalis (Boraginaceae), B. napus (Brassicaceae), C. annuum (Solanaceae), and M. sativa (Leguminosae). These species were cultivated at the Experimental site of the Agricultural College of Shihezi University in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, in 2023 (E 85°57′, N 44°19′). Sowing took place on 18 April 2023 and watering was carried out fortnightly using drip irrigation tapes. No chemical pesticides were employed; only regular fertilizers and water management practices were implemented. Relevant plants producing nectar and pollen were utilized during their respective flowering periods. All plants bloomed from July through September 2023.

2.2. Mite Cultures

T. turkestani was from a laboratory colony. The colony was cultivated on cotton plants from the Experimental Station of Shihezi University. Green bean seedlings were planted in a pot first and the T. turkestani was assessed 10–15 days later. Transfer the T. turkestani to fresh beans when the bean seedlings have wilted and feed continuously for no less than 30 generations. All colonies were maintained in a growth chamber under controlled conditions of 26 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod.
N. bicaudus were collected from Ili, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, in 2013. They were reared on Tyrophagus putrescentiae. Bran (30% bran + 60% water + 10% yeast extract fermentation) was mixed in a box, then mixed with T. putrescentiae, followed by N. bicaudus, and reared for no less than 30 consecutive generations. The boxes were then placed in a growth chamber under controlled conditions of 30 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% relative humidity, and a 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod for over 30 generations [46].

2.3. Effect of Different Nectar and Pollen Plants on Adult Longevity and Fecundity of Neoseiulus bicaudus

One newly hatched post-fertilized N. bicaudus female (a male mite having been provided for mating) was transferred onto the leaf surface in each chamber using a brush. The test chambers (5 cm × 5 cm × 0.3 cm) were constructed using three square transparent acrylic boards. A 2.5 cm diameter hole was cut in the center of the middle piece of the acrylic board, and the bean leaves were covered with a piece of filter paper that was longer than the chamber. Then, they were placed on the side of the holes and fixed to both sides of the chamber using clips [30]. In this experiment, the treatment group was set up by removing one flower of the selected plants (e.g., C. monnieri or L. maritima) with forceps. If the flowers were too large, the pistil was taken with forceps, and petals and leaves of the same size (1 cm × 1 cm) were cut using a scalpel (e.g., T. erecta, C. cyanus, B. officinalis, B. napus, C. annuum, and M. sativa). Only flower tissue was placed in the test chamber to provide food for predatory mites. The control group was set up—15 adult females reared on T. turkestani. The experimental chambers were placed in a growth chamber under controlled conditions; namely, temperature maintained at 26 ± 1 °C, relative humidity set at 60 ± 5%, and a 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod. The survival and fecundity of N. bicaudus reared on different diets were recorded once every 24 h until the death of all individuals. The chambers were regularly replaced, and fresh food was provided on a daily basis. Each treatment was replicated over 30 times.

2.4. Effect of Pollen from Nectar and Pollen Plants on the Predation Ability of Neoseiulus bicaudus

In this experiment, we reared predatory mites with a mixture of pollen from nectar and pollen plants and T. turkestani. The treatment groups were set up using newly hatched N. bicaudus feeding on T. turkestani + C. cyanus pollen, T. turkestani + B. officinalis pollen, and T. turkestani + C. monnieri pollen. The control group was N. bicaudus feeding on T. turkestani in the absence of pollen. The density of female adult spider mites was manipulated—5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 35 per chamber in the B. officinalis and C. monnieri treatment groups for prey—with each density replicated ten times. To improve the fit of the predation function curves, the density of female adult mites was manipulated—5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 35, and 40 per chamber in C. cyanus treatment groups—with each density replicated ten times. At the same time, a sufficient amount (30 ± 10 mg) of the corresponding pollen was added to each chamber (the pollen used was obtained from flowers of nectar and pollen plants, collected by gently shaking them over clean petri dishes using a brush, and utilized on the same day of collection). This experiment required prior starvation of N. bicaudus in the test chamber. The experimental specimens were placed in a growth chamber at 26 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod. The N. bicaudus adults were kept with the prey for 24 h, after which the number of consumed T. turkestani individuals was quantified.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The effects of different nectar and pollen plants on the longevity and fecundity of N. bicaudus were assessed by analyzing survival rate and fecundity data [47,48,49]. The raw data of the whole cohort were used to calculate the age stage-specific survival rate (sxj) (where x = age in days and j = stage), age stage-specific fecundity (fxj), age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific maternity (lxmx), and age-specific fecundity (mx), according to the following equations:
l x = j = 1 k s xj ,
where k is the number of stages (1 age stage of female adult mites in this study);
m x = ( j = 1 k s xj f xj ) / ( j = 1 k s xj )
The functional response of N. bicaudus was analyzed using the ‘frair’ package in the Rstudio 4.0I software [50]. Logistic regression was performed to assess the type of functional response. The equation used was
N e N 0 = exp ( p 0 + p 1 N 0 + p 2 N 0 2 + P 3 N 0 3 ) 1 + exp ( p 0 + p 1 N 0 + p 2 N 0 2 + P 3 N 0 3 ) ,
where Ne is the number of prey consumed and N0 represents the initial density of prey. The type of functional response was determined by the signs of the linear (P1) and quadratic (P2) coefficients. If the linear coefficient was significantly negative, the predator displayed a type II functional response. When the linear coefficient was positive and the quadratic coefficient was negative, the predator displayed a type III functional response.
The results of logistic regression indicated that the functional response of N. bicaudus was type II. Therefore, Rogers’ random predator model was used to fit the relationship between the number of prey consumed and initial prey density [51], using the following equation:
N e = N 0 [ 1 exp ( a N e T h aT ) ] ,
where a represents the attack rate, T represents the total predation time (1 d), and Th represents the handling time. The attack rate (a) and handing time (Th) were obtained using the function “frair_fit” from the “frair” package in Rstudio. The significance of the attack rate (a) and handing time (Th) among different treatments was analyzed by employing “frair_compare” from the “frair” package in Rstudio. Handling time (Th) is the time spent attacking and consuming a prey before search is resumed [52]. The a/Th value reflects the feeding ability of predatory mites [53].
The influence coefficient of predation on T. turkestani in the presence of pollen was determined with reference to Manly’s preference index [54], calculated using the following equation:
α = n α n β n β
where α represents the influence coefficient of predators, nα is the number of prey consumed in the presence of pollen, and nβ is the number of prey consumed when there is no pollen. Negative values of the influence coefficient represent the negative effect of pollen on T. turkestani (decreasing), while positive values represent a positive effect (increasing comsumption). No effect was observed near zero. The larger the absolute value, the greater the effect.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Different Nectar and Pollen Plants on Adult Longevity of Neoseiulus bicaudus

The age-specific survival rate (lx) provides a simplified overview of the survival rate (Figure 1). All N. bicaudus individuals exhibited 100% survival within 48 h after initiation, regardless of the (control or treatment) group. The lx curve of the control group declined on the 13th day. In addition, a higher lx of N. bicaudus was observed in the the C. monnieri, L. maritima, and C. cyanus treatment groups from 16 to 36 days, whereas a lower lx of N. bicaudus was observed under T. erecta and C. annuum treatments from 7 to 22 days.
Adult longevity under C. monnieri (24 days) was significantly longer than that of the control group (F8,289 = 18.712, p < 0.001) (Figure 2). There were no significant differences in the longevity under L. maritima, C. cyanus, M. sativa, B. officinalis, and B. napus treatments, compared with the control (p > 0.05). Longevity under C. annuum and T. erecta treatments exhibited a significant decrease compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The effect of T. erecta on the longevity of N. bicaudus (7 days) was lower than that of the other plants.

3.2. Effect of Different Nectar and Pollen Plants on Fecundity of Neoseiulus bicaudus

The age-specific fecundity (mx) and age-specific maternity (lxmx) of N. bicaudus exhibited variations across feeding on Tetranychus turkestani and the various nectar and pollen plants (Figure 3). N. bicaudus reared on T. turkestani, at an age of 4 days, exhibited the highest age-specific fecundity in female adults (mx = 1.9 eggs per female) and age-specific maternity (lxmx = 1.9 eggs per individual). N. bicaudus reared on C. annuum (mx = 1.45 eggs per female) and B. officinalis (mx = 1.4 eggs per female) diets exhibited significantly higher mx values in all treatments, while N. bicaudus reared on L. maritima (mx = 0.19 eggs per female) and T. erecta (mx = 0.05 eggs per female) diets exhibited the lowest mx values.
The fecundity serves as an indicator of the total number of eggs deposited per N. bicaudus female (Figure 4). The comparison of N. bicaudus fecundity under different treatments revealed a significantly higher fecundity, when reared on T. turkestani, compared to nectar and pollen plants (F8,289 = 47.168, p < 0.001). The fecundity under C. monnieri and C. cyanus treatments exceeded that of other plants, with 13.8 eggs and 13.4 eggs, respectively. In contrast, the impacts of L. maritima (2.1 eggs) and T. erecta (0.1 eggs) on the fecundity of N. bicaudus were lower compared to the control group and other plants.
The ANOVA results revealed the significant impact (p < 0.001) of pollen derived from diverse families and species on the oviposition rate and longevity of adult N. bicaudus females (Table 1).

3.3. Effect of Pollen from Nectar and Pollen Plants on the Predation Ability of Neoseiulus bicaudus

The predation of Tetranychus turkestani by Neoseiulus bicaudus varied with the density of prey in the presence of pollen (Table 2). For each treatment group and the control group, the consumption of T. turkestani gradually increased with increasing prey density. When the prey density was 5, 10, or 15 individuals/chamber, the results for all treatment groups were significantly lower than that of the control group (density 5: F3,41 = 4.478, p < 0.05; density 10: F3,39 = 7.024, p < 0.05; density 15: F3,47 = 4.729, p < 0.05). When the prey density reached 20 individuals/chamber, the predation rate of N. bicaudus was significantly lower than that of the control, only when pollen from B. officinalis and C. cyanus was added to the chamber (F3,46 = 11.049, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the control and treatment groups when the prey density was 25 or 35 individuals/chamber (density 25: F3,42 = 0.054, p > 0.05; density 35: F3,47 = 0.273, p > 0.05).
The logistic regression analysis revealed a significant negative linear coefficient P1 across all treatments (p < 0.001). This suggested that the predatory functional response of N. bicaudus to T. turkestani fits the type II response when provided with C. cyanus pollen, B. officinalis pollen, and C. monnieri pollen (Table 3). The predation amount of N. bicaudus gradually increased and subsequently reached a stable level in response to the rise in prey density (Figure 5).
The presence of pollen significantly decreased the attack rate (a) of N. bicaudus on T. turkestani compared to the absence of pollen (B. officinalis vs. Control: z = 3.5254, p < 0.05; C. cyanus vs. Control: z = 3.4145, p < 0.05; C. monnieri vs. Control: z = 2.8557, p < 0.05). Compared with the treatment groups after pollen addition, it was found that the female adult N. bicaudus had the highest attack rate (a = 2.41) on T. turkestani in the presence of pollen. The handing time (Th) of N. bicaudus without pollen (Th = 0.10 d) exhibited a longer duration, compared to that observed in the presence of pollen. The predation efficacy (a/Th) of N. bicaudus on T. turkestani was significantly higher than that with pollen (a/Th = 24.00), whereas the maximum consumption (1/Th) was lower than that in the presence of pollen (1/Th = 9.90 d−1) (see Table 3).
The influence coefficient (α) results demonstrated that the presence or absence of pollen had an effect on the predation of T. turkestani by N. bicaudus (Figure 6). The influence coefficient of predatory mites predation exhibited the highest absolute value in the presence of C. cyanus pollen, while it was observed to be the lowest in the presence of B. officinalis pollen. The overall value under C. monnieri treatment surpassed those for B. officinalis and C. cyanus. The value for C. cyanus surpassed that of B. officinalis at low densities, while they presented comparable values in later stages. Specifically, when the prey density was 5, 10, 15, or 20 individuals/chamber, the influence coefficients were all less than 0. When the prey density was 25 individuals/chamber, the influence coefficient was close to 0. However, when the prey density increased to 35 individuals/chamber, the value for C. cyanus exhibited a significant increase above 0, while the values for B. officinalis and C. monnieri approached 0.

4. Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the effects of eight different flowering plants on the longevity and reproduction rate of N. bicaudus. Additionally, we tested how their pollen influenced its predation ability.
Extending the lifespan of natural enemies enables their prolonged survival in the field, thereby contributing to the maintenance of natural enemy populations [55]. Our findings demonstrate that supplementing N. bicaudus with C. monnieri significantly enhanced its longevity, compared to only feeding it with T. turkestani, indicating the positive impact of C. monnieri in terms of sustaining N. bicaudus populations in agricultural environments. Similarly, Passiflora edulis prolonged the longevity of Cotesia chilonis and Perilla frutescens and had beneficial effects on the longevity of Harmonia axyridis [6,18]. On the contrary, C. annuum and T. erecta accelerated mortality in the predatory mites, suggesting that their utilization as nectar and pollen plants for biocontrol may not be suitable within agricultural environments.
The fecundity of N. bicaudus is significantly influenced by their ability to sustain a high reproductive capacity when provided with petals, pollen, nectar, and other tissues from flowering plants. This has crucial implications for evaluating the suitability of pollen and nectar plants. In this study, the production of N. bicaudus after the provision of flowering plants was as follows: C. monnieri > C. cyanus > B. officinalis > M. sativa > B. napus > C. annuum > L. maritima > T. erecta. The C. monnieri and C. cyanus treatment groups presented continuous egg-laying, indicating their sustained reproductive capacity, which is advantageous for the successful establishment of N. bicaudus in natural habitats. However, despite the provision of different flowering plants, the predatory mites exhibited a significantly reduced egg production compared to those fed T. turkestani. This phenomenon may be attributed to the necessity of a high-protein food source for successful reproduction, as well as the more favorable composition of the target prey in terms of reproductive potential. These findings are similar to those presented in previous research demonstrating that alyssum can serve as a resource subsidy for the anthocorid Orius majusculus during periods of prey scarcity in natural environments [56]. Orius majusculus exhibited continuous oviposition in the presence of L. maritima L.; however, maximum fecundity was only observed when prey were simultaneously present. Similarly, the total fecundity of the coccinellid Stethorus gilvifrons was not as high as in the presence of its natural prey, T. turkestani, when date palm pollen, maize pollen, or bee pollen were added to its diet [57,58].
In this study, we found that the family and species of nectar pollen plants were key factors influencing the longevity and fecundity of predatory mites. The observed variations in performance among different species were evidently significant. Among them, C. monnieri, C. cyanus, and B. officinalis exhibited superior qualities as nectar and pollen plants. Belonging to the Umbelliferae family, C. monnieri has umbrella-shaped, fragrant flowers and many nectaries, which effectively facilitate the conservation of diverse insects or predatory mites. B. officinalis, from the Boraginaceae family, is covered with white hairs for shelter and is high in nutrients, potentially explaining its attractiveness to predatory mites [59]. In the present study, it was found that C. cyanus, a member of the Asteraceae family, also enhanced the longevity and reproduction capacity of predatory mites. This phenomenon can be attributed to its high abundance of pollen and nectar, which are rich in essential nutrients such as sugars, fats, proteins, and flavonoids, among others [41]. The findings of this study showed that, although T. erecta belongs to the Asteraceae family, similar to C. cyanus, it led to poor survival and reproductive rates in N. bicaudus, possibly due to the presence of certain secondary compounds with adverse effects [60]. Similar observations were made with respect to B. napus and L. maritima, both of which are members of the Brassicaceae family. It is evident that plants from the same family but from different species have varying impacts on predatory mite populations. These results are consistent with previous research indicating that some flowering plant pollens are unsuitable for Amblyseius swirskii growth [26,61].
It has been reported that pollen can be used as a suitable food source for the long-term rearing of predatory mites [21,62]. It is of great significance to assess whether the presence of pollen interferes with the predation ability of predatory mites on pests. To further explore the impact of pollen on N. bicaudus cultivation, this study examined the functional response of N. bicaudus when preying upon T. turkestani in the presence of pollen [63]. The results showed that the predatory functional response of N. bicaudus to T. turkestani still fits the type II response when provided with C. cyanus pollen, B. officinalis pollen, and C. monnieri pollen, thereby indicating that the addition of pollen did not alter the feeding model [64,65]. This is consistent with a previous study [66], in which the presence of Typha orientalis pollen did not alter the functional response type of Neoseiulus cucumeris.
By analyzing the a/Th and 1/Th values of N. bicaudus in the presence and absence of pollen, it was found that the predatory efficiency of N. bicaudus on T. turkestani was highest when pollen was absent, while its maximum consumption was lowest. This result is consistent with the influence coefficient results, which were less than 0 (i.e., presence of pollen reduces predatory mite feeding on T. turkestani). The addition of pollen decreased the predatory ability of N. bicaudus, suggesting that N. bicaudus also feeds on a certain amount of pollen when pollen and prey coexist [67]. A similar phenomenon has been observed, in that providing pollen in mixed diets with high-quality prey resulted in a significant decrease in prey consumption [68]. We found that the presence of pollen had a negative impact on predation by pest mites at low prey densities; however, as the number of pest mites increased, the effect of pollen on predatory mite feeding decreased. When pests were available in large numbers, the predatory mites exhibited a preference for selecting pest mites, thus achieving optimal biological control effects. Moreover, when prey are scarce, pollen can serve as a supplementary food source to sustain the population of N. bicaudus. Similar findings have been observed when comparing the impact of plant and animal diets on various biological parameters of the phytoseiid mite, Neoseiulus cucumeris [69].
In summary, the presence of nectar and pollen plants, such as C. monnieri, C. cyanus, and B. officinalis, demonstrated positive effects on N. bicaudus, enhancing the life span and fecundity of this natural enemy species. Moreover, the preventive release of predatory mites to feed on food from nectar and pollen plants increases their survival during periods when prey is locally scarce. However, with an increase in the number of pests, the presence of pollen will not affect the effective control of predatory mites. At the same time, the considered nectar and pollen plants have aesthetic value, thus enhancing the agricultural environment. These findings establish a scientific foundation for incorporating nectar and pollen plants around target crops to effectively manage T. turkestani infestations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H., Y.L., J.Z. and J.S.; methodology, Y.H. and J.S.; validation, Y.H., J.S. and J.Z.; formal analysis, Y.H. and W.L. (Wurigemu Lipeizhong); investigation, Y.H., W.L. (Wurigemu Lipeizhong), X.L., W.L. (Weiru Liu) and J.D.; resources, J.Z. and Z.C.; data curation, Y.H. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.H., J.Z., J.S. and S.W.; visualization, Y.H.; supervision, J.Z., J.S., S.W. and Y.L.; project administration J.Z. and J.S.; funding acquisition, Y.L., J.Z. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1400300), The Major Science and Technology Projects in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022A02005-3), the Key Research and Development Project of Autonomous Region (2022B02043), the Guiding Science and Technology Plan Project of Xinjiang (2022ZD053), the State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology Open Fund (CB2022A18), and the Major Science and Technology Project of Autonomous Region (2023A02009).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Feng Ge for his extensive theoretical foundation and technical support for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Moretti, E.; Jones, C.; Schmidt-Jeffris, R.J.E.; Acarology, A. Alternative food sources for Amblydromella caudiglans (Phytoseiidae) and effects on predation. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2023, 89, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Landis, D.A.; Wratten, S.D.; Gurr, G.M. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000, 45, 175–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramakers, P.J.B.S. Manipulation of phytoseiid thrips predators in the absence of thrips. Bull. SROP 1990, 13, 169–172. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao, J.; Guo, X.; Tan, X.; Desneux, N.; Zappala, L.; Zhang, F.; Wang, S. Using Calendula officinalis as a floral resource to enhance aphid and thrips suppression by the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shimales, T.; Mendesil, E.; Zewdie, B.; Ayalew, B.; Hylander, K.; Tack, A.J.M. Management intensity affects insect pests and natural pest control on Arabica coffee in its native range. J. Appl. Ecol. 2023, 60, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, P.; Liang, R.; Qin, Y.; Xu, H.; Zou, Y.; Johnson, A.C.; Zhang, F.; Gurr, G.M.; Lu, Z. Extrafloras and floral nectar promote biocontrol services provided by parasitoid wasps to rice crops. Entomol. Gen. 2023, 43, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Q.-F.; Ouyang, F.; Men, X.-Y.; Ge, F. Functional plants: Current uses and future research. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2020, 57, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stoner, K.; Nurse, A.; Koethe, R.; Hatala, M.; Lehmann, D. Where Does Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Pollen Come from? A Study of Pollen Collected from Colonies at Ornamental Plant Nurseries. Insects 2022, 13, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. van Rijn, P.C.J.; Tanigoshi, L.K. The contribution of extrafloral nectar to survival and reproduction of the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans on Ricinus communis. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1999, 23, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parolin, P.; Bresch, C.; Poncet, C.; Suay-Cortez, R.; Van Oudenhove, L. Testing basil as banker plant in IPM greenhouse tomato crops. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2015, 61, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Russell, M. A meta-analysis of physiological and behavioral responses of parasitoid wasps to flowers of individual plant species. Biol. Control 2015, 82, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, P.; Zheng, X.; Xie, G.; Chen, G.; Lu, Z.; Gurr, G. Relevance of the ecological traits of parasitoid wasps and nectariferous plants for conservation biological control: A hybrid meta-analysis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 1881–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ribeiro, A.L.; Gontijo, L.M. Alyssum flowers promote biological control of collard pests. Biocontrol 2017, 62, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pinheiro, L.A.; Torres, L.; Raimundo, J.; Santos, S.A.P. Effect of floral resources on longevity and nutrient levels of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae). Biol. Control 2013, 67, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. van Rijn, P.C.J.; Wackers, F.L. Nectar accessibility determines fitness, flower choice and abundance of hoverflies that provide natural pest control. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 53, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schuldiner-Harpaz, T.; Coll, M. Estimating the effect of plant-provided food supplements on pest consumption by omnivorous predators: Lessons from two coccinellid beetles. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Eggs, B.; Sanders, D. Herbivory in spiders: The importance of pollen for orb-weavers. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hatt, S.; Osawa, N. The role of Perilla frutescens flowers on fitness traits of the ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis. Biocontrol 2019, 64, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, X.; Sigsgaard, L. A Floral Diet Increases the Longevity of the Coccinellid Adalia bipunctata but Does Not Allow Molting or Reproduction. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, P.; Lu, Z.; Heong, K.; Chen, G.; Zheng, X.; Xu, H.; Yang, Y.; Nicol, H.I.; Gurr, G.M. Selection of Nectar Plants for Use in Ecological Engineering to Promote Biological Control of Rice Pests by the Predatory Bug, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis, (Heteroptera: Miridae). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ansari-Shiri, H.; Fathipour, Y.; Hajiqanbar, H.; Riahi, E.; Riddick, E.W. Quality control of the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii during long-term rearing on almond Prunus amygdalus pollen. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2022, 16, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, D.-Y.; Zhou, D.; Zhi, J.-R.; Yue, W.-B.; Li, S.-X. Effects of Different Parts of the Rose Flower on the Development, Fecundity, and Life Parameters of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Insects 2023, 14, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Avery, P.B.; Kumar, V.; Xiao, Y.; Powell, C.A.; McKenzie, C.L.; Osborne, L.S. Selecting an ornamental pepper banker plant for Amblyseius swirskii in floriculture crops. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2014, 8, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gurr, G.M.; Wratten, S.D.; Landis, D.A.; You, M. Habitat Management to Suppress Pest Populations: Progress and Prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017, 62, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kumar, V.; Xiao, Y.; McKenzie, C.L.; Osborne, L.S. Early establishment of the phytoseiid mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on pepper seedlings in a Predator-in-First approach. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 65, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Eini, N.; Jafari, S.; Fathipour, Y.; Zalucki, M.P. How pollen grains of 23 plant species affect performance of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus. Biocontrol 2022, 67, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goleva, I.; Zebitz, C.P.W. Suitability of different pollen as alternative food for the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2013, 61, 259–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Riahi, E.; Fathipour, Y.; Talebi, A.A.; Mehrabadi, M. Pollen quality and predator viability: Life table of Typhlodromus bagdasarjani on seven different plant pollens and two-spotted spider mite. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 21, 1399–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asali Fayaz, B.; Khanjani, M.; Uckermann, E. Description of immature stages and re-description of female and male of Neoseiulus bicaudus(Wainstein, 1962) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from West of Iran. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 2011, 46, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Su, J.; Liu, M.; Fu, Z.-S.; Zhu, A.-D.; Zhang, J.-P. Effects of alternative and natural prey on body size, locomotion and dispersal of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2019, 24, 1579–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, B.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X. Re-description of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) newly recorded from Xinjiang, China. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 20, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Su, J.; Dong, F.; Liu, S.-M.; Lu, Y.-H.; Zhang, J.-P. Productivity of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Reared on Natural Prey, Alternative Prey, and Artificial Diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 2604–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sun, W.; Xia, L.; Wu, Y. Life Histories and Functional Responses of Two Predatory Mites Feeding on the Stored-Grain Pest Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Insects 2023, 14, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Y.-N.; Guo, D.-D.; Jiang, J.-Y.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Zhang, J.-P. Effects of host plant species on the development and reproduction of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Phytoseiidae) feeding on Tetranychus turkestani (Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 21, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dong, F.; Fu, Z.-S.; Wang, J.-Y.; Su, J.; Chen, J.; Lu, Y.-H.; Zhang, J.-P. Evaluation of Control Effect of Releasing Neoseiulus bicaudus Wainstein on the Tetranychus turkestani(Ugarov et Nikolskii). Xinjiang Agric. Sci. 2019, 56, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pan, M.-Z.; Liu, T.-X. Banker-plant system for biological control of pests in greenhouse-grown crops. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2019, 56, 917–926. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ding, R.-F.; Wang, X.-L.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.-B.; Wang, F.; Wang, D.; Sun, S.-L. The Effect of Honey Plants on Arthropod Community in Apricot and Wheat Intercropping Orchard. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 45, 960–963. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, X.; Ouyang, F.; Su, J.; Li, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Sun, Y.; Sarkar, S.C.; Xiao, Y.; Ge, F. Intercropping flowering plants facilitate conservation, movement and biocontrol performance of predators in insecticide-free apple orchard. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 340, 108–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guillemin, J.-P.; Alrustom, B.; Darmency, H. Estimated effects of cornflower presence on winter wheat. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2022, 38, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thom, M.D.; Eberle, C.A.; Forcella, F.; Gesch, R.; Weyers, S. Specialty oilseed crops provide an abundant source of pollen for pollinators and beneficial insects. J. Appl. Entomol. 2018, 142, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hoarau, C.; Campbell, H.; Prince, G.; Chandler, D.; Pope, T. Biological control agents against the cabbage stem flea beetle in oilseed rape crops. Biol. Control 2022, 167, 104–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tiwari, S.; Sharma, S.; Wratten, S.D. Flowering alyssum (Lobularia maritima) promote arthropod diversity and biological control of Myzus persicae. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2020, 23, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Barloggio, G.; Tamm, L.; Nagel, P.; Luka, H. Selective flowers to attract and enhance Telenomus laeviceps (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae): A released biocontrol agent of Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2019, 109, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kumar, V.; McKenzie, C.L.; Avery, P.B.; Osborne, L.S. Suitability of Ornamental Pepper Cultivars as Banker Plants for the Establishment of Predatory Mite Amblyseius swirskii in Controlled Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pemberton, R.W. Plant Resource Use and Pattern of Usage by the Naturalized Orchid Bee (Euglossa dilemma: Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Florida. Insects 2023, 14, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hu, H.; Tang, S.; Fang, C.; Mu, K.; Su, J.; Zhang, J. Presence of nontarget prey, Tetranychus truncatus, affected the predation by Neoseiulus bicaudus on Tetranychus turkestani. J. Econ. Entomol. 2023, 116, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chi, H.; Su, H.Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ning, S.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Feng, J. Development of insect life tables: Comparison of two demographic methods of Delia antiqua (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) on different hosts. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pritchard, D.W.; Paterson, R.A.; Bovy, H.C.; Barrios-O’Neill, D. FRAIR: An R package for fitting and comparing consumer functional responses. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017, 8, 1528–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rogers, D. Random search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 1972, 66, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Longstaff, B.C. The functional response of a predatory mite and the nature of the attack rate. Aust. J. Ecol. 1981, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yan, Y.-J.; Wu, Z.-F. Predation on Nilaparvata lugens by Erigonidium graminicolum and their simulation models. J. Fujian Agric. Coll. 1989, 3, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  54. Manly, B.J.B. A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics 1974, 30, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, Q.-F.; Ouyang, F.; Men, X.-Y.; Ge, F. Discovery and utilization of a functional plant, rich in the natural enemies of insect pests, in northern China. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2018, 55, 942–947. [Google Scholar]
  56. Pumarino, L.; Alomar, O. The role of omnivory in the conservation of predators: Orius majusculus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on sweet alyssum. Biol. Control 2012, 62, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ebrahimifar, J.; Shishehbor, P.; Rasekh, A.; Riddick, E.W. Effect of factitious diets on development and reproduction of the ladybird beetle Stethorus gilvifrons, a predator of tetranychid mites. Biocontrol 2020, 65, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiang, S.; Li, H.; He, L.; Wu, K. Population Fitness of Eupeodes corollae Fabricius (Diptera: Syrphidae) Feeding on Different Species of Aphids. Insects 2022, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sigsgaard, L.; Betzer, C.; Naulin, C.; Eilenberg, J.; Enkegaard, A.; Kristensen, K. The effect of floral resources on parasitoid and host longevity: Prospects for conservation biological control in strawberries. J. Insect Sci. 2013, 13, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jakubowska, M.; Dobosz, R.; Zawada, D.; Kowalska, J. A review of crop protection methods against the twospotted spider mite—Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)—With special reference to alternative methods. Agriculture 2022, 12, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Schoeller, E.N.; McKenzie, C.L.; Osborne, L.S. Chilli thrips rose management using an Amblyseius swirskii or Amblydromalus limonicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) pepper banker plant. J. Appl. Entomol. 2022, 146, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De Clercq, P. Plants in the rearing of arthropod predators and parasitoids: Benefits, constraints, and alternatives. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2023, 61, 101139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Holling, C.S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism1. Can. Entomol. 1959, 91, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thao, N.T.P.; Thuy, N.T.; Quyen, H.L. Effects of Different Diets on Biological Characteristics of Predatory Mite Amblyseius Eharai (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Insects 2023, 14, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, P.; He, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, R. Functional Response and Intraspecific Competition of Three Ladybird Species Feeding on Aphids on Goji Berry Plants in Laboratory and Semi-Field Conditions. Insects 2023, 14, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, Q.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, X. Effect of Short-Term High-Temperature Stimuli on the Functional Response of Trichopria drosophilae (Matsumura). Insects 2023, 14, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Samaras, K.; Pappas, M.L.; Pekas, A.; Waeckers, F.; Broufas, G.D. Benefits of a balanced diet? Mixing prey with pollen is advantageous for the phytoseiid predator Amblydromalus limonicus. Biol. Control 2021, 155, 104531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, D.; Zhou, X.; Jin, L. Functional Response and Control Potential of Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on Tea Thrips (Dendrothrips minowai Priesner). Insects 2021, 12, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sarwar, M. Comparative life history characteristics of the mite predator Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on mite and pollen diets. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2016, 62, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Age-specific survival rate (lx) of Neoseiulus bicaudus feeding on Tetranychus turkestani or nectar and pollen plants.
Figure 1. Age-specific survival rate (lx) of Neoseiulus bicaudus feeding on Tetranychus turkestani or nectar and pollen plants.
Insects 15 00190 g001
Figure 2. Adult longevity of Neoseiulus bicaudus feeding on different nectar and pollen plants. The values are means ± SE. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, SPSS 26.0.
Figure 2. Adult longevity of Neoseiulus bicaudus feeding on different nectar and pollen plants. The values are means ± SE. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, SPSS 26.0.
Insects 15 00190 g002
Figure 3. Age-specific fecundity of the total population (mx) and age-specific maternity (lxmx) of Neoseiulus bicaudus feeding on Tetranychus turkestani and nectar and pollen plants.
Figure 3. Age-specific fecundity of the total population (mx) and age-specific maternity (lxmx) of Neoseiulus bicaudus feeding on Tetranychus turkestani and nectar and pollen plants.
Insects 15 00190 g003
Figure 4. The fecundity of Neoseiulus bicaudus on different nectar and pollen plants. The values are means ± SE. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, SPSS 26.0.
Figure 4. The fecundity of Neoseiulus bicaudus on different nectar and pollen plants. The values are means ± SE. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, SPSS 26.0.
Insects 15 00190 g004
Figure 5. The predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus on Tetranychus turkestani in the presence of pollen. The shaded part in green are 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5. The predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus on Tetranychus turkestani in the presence of pollen. The shaded part in green are 95% confidence intervals.
Insects 15 00190 g005
Figure 6. The influence coefficient of predation on T. turkestani by N. bicaudus in the presence of various pollens.
Figure 6. The influence coefficient of predation on T. turkestani by N. bicaudus in the presence of various pollens.
Insects 15 00190 g006
Table 1. ANOVA results of oviposition and adult longevity of Neoseiulus bicaudus females in the presence of pollen from different families or species.
Table 1. ANOVA results of oviposition and adult longevity of Neoseiulus bicaudus females in the presence of pollen from different families or species.
OvipositionAdult Longevity
SourcesdfFpdfFp
Nectar and pollen plantsFamily518.048<0.00158.500<0.001
Species735.475<0.001719.727<0.001
Table 2. Predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus on Tetranychus turkestani in the absence (control) or presence of different pollens. Data are means ± SE. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between the same treatments, different prey densities (p < 0.01); different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the different treatments, same prey densities (p< 0.05).
Table 2. Predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus on Tetranychus turkestani in the absence (control) or presence of different pollens. Data are means ± SE. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between the same treatments, different prey densities (p < 0.01); different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the different treatments, same prey densities (p< 0.05).
TreatmentPrey Density (Individuals/Chamber)
5101520253540
T. turkestani (Control)3.9 ± 1.04 Ca5.9 ± 1.58 BCa7.2 ± 1.99 ABa8.3 ± 1.68 ABa8.3 ± 2.10 ABa8.5 ± 2.06 Aa-
T. turkestani + B. officinalis2.4 ± 1.50 Cb3.2 ± 1.47 BCc4.3 ± 2.29 BCb4.9 ± 1.08 Bb8.1 ± 3.35 Aa8.4 ± 2.25 Aa-
T. turkestani + C. cyanus1.8 ± 1.57 Cb3.8 ± 0.60 BCbc5.2 ± 1.07 Bb5.3 ± 1.81 Bb7.8 ± 2.41 Aa8.9 ± 2.51 Aa8.6 ± 2.09 A
T. turkestani + C. monnieri2.3 ± 0.96 Db4.6 ± 1.50 Cb5.5 ± 1.50 BCb7.0 ± 1.86 ABa8.1 ± 2.40 Aa8.2 ± 2.11 Aa-
Table 3. Estimates of functional response of Neoseiulus bicaudus to female adult mites of Tetranychus turkestani in the presence of pollen. Data are mean ± SE. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Estimates of functional response of Neoseiulus bicaudus to female adult mites of Tetranychus turkestani in the presence of pollen. Data are mean ± SE. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05).
TreatmentMaximum Likelihood EstimateAttack RateHanding TimePredation
Efficacy
Maximum
Consumtion
P1 ± SEzpa ± SETh ± SE(a/Th)(1/Th)
T. turkestani (Control)−0.0637 ± 0.0072−8.901<0.0012.41 ± 0.53 a0.10 ± 0.01 a24.009.90
T. turkestani + B. officinalis−0.0184 ± 0.0066−2.795<0.0010.51 ± 0.09 b0.06 ± 0.02 b9.1817.86
T. turkestani + C. cyanus−0.0222 ± 0.0046−4.786<0.0010.58 ± 0.09 b0.06 ± 0.018 b9.4416.39
T. turkestani + C. monnieri−0.0351 ± 0.0063−5.527<0.0010.84 ± 0.14 b0.08 ± 0.018 a11.0813.16
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, Y.; Lipeizhong, W.; Liang, X.; Cai, Z.; Liu, W.; Dou, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Su, J. Effects of Various Nectar and Pollen Plants on the Survival, Reproduction, and Predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus. Insects 2024, 15, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15030190

AMA Style

Han Y, Lipeizhong W, Liang X, Cai Z, Liu W, Dou J, Lu Y, Zhang J, Wang S, Su J. Effects of Various Nectar and Pollen Plants on the Survival, Reproduction, and Predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus. Insects. 2024; 15(3):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15030190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Yue, Wurigemu Lipeizhong, Xinqi Liang, Zhiping Cai, Weiru Liu, Jifei Dou, Yanhui Lu, Jianping Zhang, Shaoshan Wang, and Jie Su. 2024. "Effects of Various Nectar and Pollen Plants on the Survival, Reproduction, and Predation of Neoseiulus bicaudus" Insects 15, no. 3: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15030190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop