Next Article in Journal
Correction: Fan et al. First Evidence of CpGV Resistance of Codling Moth in the USA. Insects 2022, 13, 533
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Anopheles funestus in Western Kenya Based on Mitochondrial DNA Marker COII
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Spodoptera exigua Population: Does the Nutritional Status Matter?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Polymorphism and Phylogenetics of Aedes aegypti from Sudan Based on ND4 Mitochondrial Gene Variations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Population Genetics of Anopheles pretoriensis in Grande Comore Island

1
Vector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
2
Malaria Control Program, Moroni, Comoros
3
Mosquito Control Research Laboratory, Kearney Research and Extension Center, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Parlier, CA 93648, USA
4
Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 200 9th St SE, Vero Beach, FL 32962, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010014
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biology, Genetics and Evolution of Mosquitoes)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this study, we assessed phylogenetics of 24 Anopheles species and the genetic structure of Anopheles pretoriensis populations on Grande Comore Island. Our study is the first to report the whole mitochondria genome of A. pretoriensis and the first to inform on the genetic relationship of this species’ populations, both within the island of Grande Comore and between the island and continental Africa. Studies on secondary vectors of malaria, such as A. pretoriensis, are significant because they have been reconsidered in regard to their role in sustaining malaria transmission after primary vectors are controlled.

Abstract

Anopheles pretoriensis is widely distributed across Africa, including on oceanic islands such as Grande Comore in the Comoros. This species is known to be mostly zoophylic and therefore considered to have low impact on the transmission of human malaria. However, A. pretoriensis has been found infected with Plasmodium, suggesting that it may be epidemiologically important. In the present study, we sequenced and assembled the complete mitogenome of A. pretoriensis and inferred its phylogenetic relationship among other species in the subgenus Cellia. We also investigated the genetic structure of A. pretoriensis populations on Grande Comore Island, and between this island population and sites in continental Africa, using partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Seven haplotypes were found on the island, one of which was ubiquitous. There was no clear divergence between island haplotypes and those found on the continent. The present work contributes knowledge on this understudied, yet abundant, Anopheles species.

1. Introduction

Malaria is a life-threatening disease caused by protozoa in the genus Plasmodium and is transmitted to humans by female mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles. There are 465 Anopheles species officially recognized worldwide, only 70 of which are known to transmit human malaria parasites [1]. These species differ in geographic distribution and can be classified as primary vectors, those that contribute the most to malaria transmission in a specific area, or as alternative vectors, those with secondary importance in malaria epidemiology. The latter are often overlooked, but studies have shown that these species may sustain malaria transmission after primary vector populations are suppressed or eliminated [2,3,4].
Malaria is endemic in the Union of the Comoros, a nation composed of three volcanic islands in the Indian Ocean: Grande Comore, Mohéli, and Anjouan. In 2010, the country reached its record in malaria cases, when over 100,000 cases were reported [5]. In the following years, a combination of preventative and control measures caused a substantial decline in malaria incidence [6]. These efforts placed Grande Comore Island within the WHO control phase in the path toward malaria-free status and placed the remaining islands in the pre-elimination phase [5,7].
Seven species of Anopheles have been reported to be present in the Comoros: the primary vectors include A. gambiae s.s. (hereafter A. gambiae), A. merus, and A. funestus; and secondary vector/non-vector species present are A. coustani, A. maculipalpis, A. mascarensis and A. pretoriensis [5,8,9]. It is unknown if the latter species play a significant role in malaria transmission in the Comoros. However, A. coustani and A. pretoriensis have been found to host P. falciparum sporozoites elsewhere in Africa [2,4,10]. Here, we present a new mitogenome assembly for A. pretoriensis and describe the genetic structure of populations on Grande Comore Island and their relationship with neighboring mainland populations. This study improves the state of knowledge of this potential malaria vector.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

Grande Comore is the largest (1148 sq. km) and youngest island in the Comoros archipelago which lies roughly midway between Madagascar and Mozambique in the Indian Ocean. The island has a tropical climate with a hot and rainy season (rainfall ranging from 1500 to 2000 mm) occurring between November and April and a cool and dry season (rainfall ranging from 500 to 800 mm) between May and October. There is an active volcano, Mount Karthala (2361 m), in the south-central part of the island that forms a belt of higher elevation (>500 m) running north to south. Watercourses are absent in Grande Comore due to the highly permeable volcanic substrate which led to widespread construction of large water cisterns for domestic use. These cisterns are the main breeding sites for mosquitoes on the island (reviewed in [5]). Grande Comore is home to the capital city of Moroni and is the most populated of the three islands that constitute the Union of the Comoros.

2.2. Mosquito Sampling

Immature stages of mosquitoes were collected from 20 sites from Grande Comore in March 2020 (Figure 1, Table S1). Breeding sites were predominantly in outdoor cisterns followed by pools of standing water in roads and near villages. A subset of samples was reared to the adult stage, and these were morphologically identified to species in the field. All samples were preserved individually in 1.5 ml tubes filled with 80% ethanol and archived at the Vector Genetics Laboratory, at the University of California, Davis. Individual mosquito DNA was extracted using a Qiagen Biosprint machine following our established protocol [11]. Molecular identification was performed using the ITS2 region following an established protocol [2].

2.3. Mitogenome Sequencing and Analysis

The whole sequence of A. pretoriensis mitochondria was assembled using total genomic sequencing from one female adult specimen. Following extraction DNA yield was measured using a dsDNA high sensitivity assay kit on a Qubit instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The KAPA HyperPlus Kit (Roche Sequencing Solutions, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used for library preparation using 10 ng DNA as input, as described in [12]. Library size selection and clean-up was performed using AMPure SPRI beads (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The library was sequenced for 150 bp paired-end reads using a HiSeq 4000 instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at Novogene Corporation, Sacramento, CA. Raw-sequencing reads were used to assemble the mitogenome using NOVOPlasty version 2.6.7 [13]. The final contig was annotated with MITOS [14] using the invertebrate genetic code under default settings.
Phylogenetic analyses included the newly assembled A. (Cellia) pretoriensis mitogenome, 20 additional species also in the subgenus Cellia, and three species, each from a different subgenus: Anopheles (A. coustani), Nyssorhyncus (A. darlingi) and Kerteszia (A. cruzii) (accession numbers in Table S2). Protein coding sequences were used for multiple alignment of mitogenomes using Muscle v3.8 [15] built-in Geneious Prime 2022.2 (https://www.geneious.com, accessed on 28 November 2022). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood (ML) inference with 1000 bootstrap replicates using a general time reversible (GTR) mode in PhyML 3.3 [16].

2.4. COI Sequencing and Analysis

Partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified and sequenced from 84 A. pretoriensis specimens from Grande Comore Island (Table S3). Universal primer pair (LCO1490: 5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′; HCO2198: 5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′) was used to amplify this region [17]. Amplification of COI was performed in a 25 μl PCR mixture consisting of 10 pmol of each primer and 12.5 μl of GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA) and 1 μl of DNA template. Thermocycler conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; and a final extension step of 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were visualized by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Positive amplicons were then purified using AMPure SPRI beads (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA), following manufacturers protocol. Amplicons were sent for Sanger sequencing at the UC Davis DNA Sequencing facility.
COI sequences were combined in a multiple sequence alignment using Muscle v3.8 [15] with default parameters and used to build a haplotype network using TCS network in PopArt [18]. Genetic diversity within A. pretoriensis populations in Grande Comore Island was determined by haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) as estimated using DnaSP v6 [19]. An additional 10 A. pretoriensis COI sequences from mainland Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia) were retrieved from GenBank and included in a ML phylogenetic tree using GTR mode in PhyML 3.3 [16], with 1000 bootstrap replications.

3. Results

3.1. Mosquito Identification and Abundance

A total of 923 specimens were collected, preserved, and molecularly identified from 20 sites in Grande Comore Island. Two species of Anopheles were identified: A. pretoriensis and A. gambiae. Anopheles pretoriensis was ubiquitous on the island and accounted for 81.6% of specimens collected during this study (Figure 1, Table S1). Anopheles gambiae was present in 8 of the 20 sites sampled. Its distribution was limited to southern and central western sites in Grande Comore (Figure 1). There was a difference of about 70 bp in the length of ITS2 region between A. gambiae and A. pretoriensis, confirmed by Sanger sequence (accession numbers OP851349 and OP851350, respectively); therefore, we used ITS2 PCR for species identification.

3.2. Anopheles Pretoriensis Mitogenome Phylogeny

The complete mitogenome of A. pretoriensis (Genbank: ON479654) has a length of 15,712 bp. Thirteen protein coding genes (PCGs), 22 tRNA genes and 2 rRNA genes were annotated in the mitogenome and its AT content was 77.2%, which is comparable to other species in the subgenus Cellia [20].
The phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2) contains 24 terminals from the genus Anopheles, representing four subgenera (Kerteszia, Nyssorhyncus, Anopheles and Cellia) with four series within the subgenus Cellia (Myzomyia, Neocellia, Neomyzomyia and Pyretophorus). Relationships among subgenera and series within the subgenus Cellia were resolved with significant support using ML analysis (ML > 70) and these were for the most part concordant with conventional morphological classifications. However, relationships within the series Neocellia and Neomyzomyia were unresolved. Anopheles (Kerteszia) cruzii was used to root the phylogeny. Anopheles (Nyssorhyncus) darlingi was recovered as the earliest branching lineage and is sister to a clade of subgenera Anopheles plus Cellia (Figure 2). Subgenus Anopheles was recovered as a sister clade to Cellia. The series Pyretophorus was recovered as the earliest branching lineage within the Cellia clade and is a monophyletic sister clade to Myzomyia + Neocellia + Neomyzomyia (Figure 2). The series Neomyzomyia was recovered as a sister clade to Neocellia + Myzomyia (Figure 2). Myzomyia was recovered as a monophyletic clade and is sister to the clade of Neocellia (Figure 2).

3.3. Anopheles pretoriensis Population Genetics

Following DNA extraction and ITS2 PCR molecular diagnostic, specimens of A. pretoriensis the COI fragment were sequenced (GenBank accession on Table S3). All COI sequences matched (>99% percent identity) previously reported A. pretoriensis sequences deposited in NCBI (as of 27 May 2022). Analysis of COI sequences from 84 A. pretoriensis specimens yielded 7 haplotypes, distinguished by 9 informative variable sites and 1 singleton (Figure 3A). One haplotype, H1, was present in all but one site (Bangoi Hambou) in Grande Comore Island (Figure 3B). The overall haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) of A. pretoriensis were 0.56 and 0.0025, respectively.
The ML phylogeny constructed using the partial COI gene region (final length of 611 bp) represents 20 terminals from the genus Anopheles and three species: A. gambiae, A. stephensi and A. pretoriensis. Anopheles pretoriensis specimens included 7 unique haplotypes from Grande Comore Island and sequences retrieved from GenBank from continental Africa: Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa and Zambia. Relationships among A. pretoriensis samples within the COI phylogeny were mostly unresolved using ML analysis (ML > 70, Figure 3C). Anopheles gambiae from Grande Comore Island (OP620446) was used to root the phylogeny and we recovered A. stephensi (MN329060) from India as sister to the A. pretoriensis clade. We recovered two individual A. pretoriensis (MK628505 and MK625502) as the earliest branching lineages to the unresolved polyphyletic clade comprised of the remaining A. pretoriensis (Figure 3C).

4. Discussion

Anopheles pretoriensis was first described in 1903 by Theobald [21]. The species name is based on the location of its discovery in Pretoria, South Africa. This species’ geographic distribution is widespread in Africa, being present in over 30 continental countries [22,23] and in islands such as Cape Verde [24], Comoros [8], Madagascar [25] and Mayotte [26]. Anopheles pretoriensis has also been reported in Saudi Arabia [27] and Yemen [28]. Taxonomic classification places A. pretoriensis within the series Neocellia in the subgenus Cellia. Our phylogenetic analysis is concordant with this taxonomic arrangement, grouping A. pretoriensis with other members of Neocellia series included here (A. maculatus, A. splendidus and A. stephensi).
In the Comoros, A. pretoriensis has been found on all three islands as reported by a field expedition in 1949 by Lavergne [29]. Similarly, our collection in Grande Comore identified the presence of only two anophelines: A. gambiae and A. pretoriensis. Marsden et al. [8] reported consistent differences in wing markings between A. pretoriensis specimens found in the Comoros and continental Africa, indicating local divergence not detected in our COI sequence analysis. Seven COI haplotypes were uniquely found in Grande Comore; however, our phylogenetic analysis revealed unsupported divergence between those haplotypes and the ones from mainland Africa. There was no population structure of A. pretoriensis on Grande Comore Island, with haplotype H1 being predominant (present in 17 out of 18 sites). Genetic diversity was lower than other species from mainland [10,30,31] as expected under island biogeography theory [32]. The most ancestral population were from the continental African country of Ethiopia, suggesting an east African origin of A. pretoriensis.
Anopheles pretoriensis has been generally considered as a non-vector of human malaria, due to its zoophylic behavior [22]. However, a recent study detected positive Plasmodium infections in several Anopheles species considered as non-vectors, including A. pretoriensis [2]. This suggests that control strategies that suppress or eliminate the major vector, A. gambiae, may result in the elevation of A. pretoriensis to major malaria vector status on Grande Comore. Additional studies on Plasmodium infectivity would expand our knowledge of the vectorial competence and capacity of A. pretoriensis. The present study was the first to sequence and assemble the mitogenome of A. pretoriensis, as well as to conduct population genetics investigation of this species on Grande Comore Island.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14010014/s1, Table S1: Number of A. gambiae and A. pretoriensis specimens collected on each site in Grande Comore. Table S2: GenBank accession number of Anopheles mitogenomes included in the phylogenetic analysis. Table S3: Metadata of partial sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and respective GenBank accession number.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C., N.P. and C.M.; Data curation, M.C., N.P., C.M., H.G., M.W.C., A.T., Y.A., A.J.C. and Y.L.; Investigation, A.T., Y.A., A.J.C., Y.L. and G.C.L.; Methodology, M.C., N.P., C.M., H.G. and M.W.C.; Formal analysis, M.C. and R.E.D.; Funding acquisition, G.C.L.; Project administration, M.C.; Resources, N.P., C.M., H.G., Y.L., A.J.C., A.T. and Y.A.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.C.; Writing—review and editing, N.P., C.M., H.G., M.W.C., R.E.D., A.T., Y.A., A.J.C., Y.L. and G.C.L.; Supervision, G.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the UC Irvine Malaria Initiative Program (A17-0209) and Open Philanthropy (A20-3521).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in GenBank: mitochondrial genome (accession number ON479654); COI sequences (accession on Table S3).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Christine Coleman for reviewing the manuscript. We thank the National Malaria Control Program personnel from the Comoros for facilitating field collections in the islands.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sinka, M.E.; Bangs, M.J.; Manguin, S.; Rubio-Palis, Y.; Chareonviriyaphap, T.; Coetzee, M.; Mbogo, C.M.; Hemingway, J.; Patil, A.P.; Temperley, W.H.; et al. A global map of dominant malaria vectors. Parasit Vectors 2012, 5, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lobo, N.F.; St Laurent, B.; Sikaala, C.H.; Hamainza, B.; Chanda, J.; Chinula, D.; Krishnankutty, S.M.; Mueller, J.D.; Deason, N.A.; Hoang, Q.T.; et al. Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: Implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Antonio-Nkondjio, C.; Kerah, C.H.; Simard, F.; Awono-Ambene, P.; Chouaibou, M.; Tchuinkam, T.; Fontenille, D. Complexity of the malaria vectorial system in Cameroon: Contribution of secondary vectors to malaria transmission. J. Med. Entomol. 2006, 43, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Braack, L.; Bornman, R.; Kruger, T.; Dahan-Moss, Y.; Gilbert, A.; Kaiser, M.; Oliver, S.V.; Cornel, A.J.; Lee, Y.; Norris, D.E.; et al. Malaria Vectors and Vector Surveillance in Limpopo Province (South Africa): 1927 to 2018. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chakir, I.; Said, A.I.; Affane, B.; Jambou, R. Control of malaria in the Comoro Islands over the past century. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kassim, S.; James, P.; Alolga, R.; Assanhou, A.; Kassim, S.; Bacar, A.; Silai, R.; Tian, L.; Li, H.; Ma, A. Major decline in malaria morbidity and mortality in the Union of Comoros between 2010 and 2014: The effect of a combination of prevention and control measures. S. Afr. Med. J. 2016, 106, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Attoumane, A.; Silai, R.; Bacar, A.; Cardinale, E.; Pennober, G.; Herbreteau, V. Changing Patterns of Malaria in Grande Comore after a Drastic Decline: Importance of Fine-Scale Spatial Analysis to Inform Future Control Actions. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marsden, C.D.; Cornel, A.; Lee, Y.; Sanford, M.R.; Norris, L.C.; Goodell, P.B.; Nieman, C.C.; Han, S.; Rodrigues, A.; Denis, J.; et al. An analysis of two island groups as potential sites for trials of transgenic mosquitoes for malaria control. Evol. Appl. 2013, 6, 706–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lanzaro, G.C.; Campos, M.; Crepeau, M.; Cornel, A.; Estrada, A.; Gripkey, H.; Haddad, Z.; Kormos, A.; Palomares, S. Selection of sites for field trials of genetically engineered mosquitoes with gene drive. Evol. Appl. 2021, 14, 2147–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ciubotariu, I.I.; Jones, C.M.; Kobayashi, T.; Bobanga, T.; Muleba, M.; Pringle, J.C.; Stevenson, J.C.; Carpi, G.; Norris, D.E. Genetic Diversity of Anopheles coustani (Diptera: Culicidae) in Malaria Transmission Foci in Southern and Central Africa. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 1782–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nieman, C.C.; Yamasaki, Y.; Collier, T.C.; Lee, Y. A DNA extraction protocol for improved DNA yield from individual mosquitoes. F1000Research 2015, 4, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Yamasaki, Y.K.; Nieman, C.C.; Chang, A.N.; Collier, T.C.; Main, B.J.; Lee, Y. Improved tools for genomic DNA library construction of small insects. F1000Research 2016, 5, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dierckxsens, N.; Mardulyn, P.; Smits, G. NOVOPlasty: De novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Juhling, F.; Externbrink, F.; Florentz, C.; Fritzsch, G.; Putz, J.; Middendorf, M.; Stadler, P.F. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  18. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. Popart: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P.; Ramos-Onsins, S.E.; Sánchez-Gracia, A. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, J.; Yan, Z.T.; Fu, W.B.; Yuan, H.; Li, X.D.; Chen, B. Complete mitogenomes of Anopheles peditaeniatus and Anopheles nitidus and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Anopheles inferred from mitogenomes. Parasit Vectors 2021, 14, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Theobald, F.V. A Monograph of the Culicidae of the World; British Museum (Natural History): London, UK, 1903; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gillies, M.T.; De Meillon, B.A. The Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Ethiopian Zoogeographical Region). S. Afr. Inst. Med. Res. Johannesbg. 1968, 54, 3–343. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kyalo, D.; Amratia, P.; Mundia, C.W.; Mbogo, C.M.; Coetzee, M.; Snow, R.W. A geo-coded inventory of anophelines in the Afrotropical Region south of the Sahara: 1898–2016. Wellcome Open Res. 2017, 2, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pires, S.; Alves, J.; Dia, I.; Gómez, L.F. Susceptibility of mosquito vectors of the city of Praia, Cabo Verde, to Temephos and Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tedrow, R.E.; Rakotomanga, T.; Nepomichene, T.; Howes, R.E.; Ratovonjato, J.; Ratsimbasoa, A.C.; Svenson, G.J.; Zimmerman, P.A. Anopheles mosquito surveillance in Madagascar reveals multiple blood feeding behavior and Plasmodium infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Le Goff, G.; Goodman, S.M.; Elguero, E.; Robert, V. Survey of the mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Mayotte. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Al-Sheik, A.A. Larval habitat, ecology, seasonal abundance and vectorial role in malaria transmission of Anopheles arabiensis in Jazan Region of Saudi Arabia. J. Egypt Soc. Parasitol. 2011, 41, 615–634. [Google Scholar]
  28. Al-Eryani, S.M.A.; Kelly-Hope, L.; Harbach, R.E.; Briscoe, A.G.; Barnish, G.; Azazy, A.; McCall, P.J. Entomological aspects and the role of human behaviour in malaria transmission in a highland region of the Republic of Yemen. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jacques, B. Les moustiques de l’archipel Comores. Sér. Entomol. Médicale Parasitol. 1977, 15, 153–170. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gutiérrez, L.A.; González, J.J.; Gómez, G.F.; Castro, M.I.; Rosero, D.A.; Luckhart, S.; Conn, J.E.; Correa, M.M. Species composition and natural infectivity of anthropophilic Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) in the states of Córdoba and Antioquia, Northwestern Colombia. Memórias Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2009, 104, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Naranjo-Díaz, N.; Conn, J.E.; Correa, M.M. Behavior and population structure of Anopheles darlingi in Colombia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 39, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Frankham, R. Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 1997, 78, 311–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Relative abundance of Anopheles spp. in Grande Comore Island. Map of sampling sites where immature specimens of Anopheles were collected across Grande Comore. Pie charts display relative abundance of A. gambiae (yellow) and A. pretoriensis (black).
Figure 1. Relative abundance of Anopheles spp. in Grande Comore Island. Map of sampling sites where immature specimens of Anopheles were collected across Grande Comore. Pie charts display relative abundance of A. gambiae (yellow) and A. pretoriensis (black).
Insects 14 00014 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Anopheles species based on mitogenomes. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny was constructed with sequence of 13 protein coding genes from 21 species of Anopheles from the four series within the subgenus Cellia, including the newly sequenced A. pretoriensis. One species from each of the subgenera: Anopheles, Nyssorhyncus and Kerteszia. Branch values indicate bootstrap replications (displayed values > 80).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Anopheles species based on mitogenomes. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny was constructed with sequence of 13 protein coding genes from 21 species of Anopheles from the four series within the subgenus Cellia, including the newly sequenced A. pretoriensis. One species from each of the subgenera: Anopheles, Nyssorhyncus and Kerteszia. Branch values indicate bootstrap replications (displayed values > 80).
Insects 14 00014 g002
Figure 3. Population genetics of A. pretoriensis in Grande Comore Island. (A) Haplotype network of COI sequences from 84 A. pretoriensis specimens collected throughout Grande Comore. Haplotypes were named H1-H7 and color coded. (B) Geographic distribution of COI haplotypes; haplotype H1 was present in all but one site. (C) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 7 COI haplotypes found in Grande Comore and 12 COI A. pretoriensis sequences from specimens collected from continental Africa. Anopheles gambiae and A. stephensi were included as outgroup species. Branch values indicate supported bootstrap values (>70).
Figure 3. Population genetics of A. pretoriensis in Grande Comore Island. (A) Haplotype network of COI sequences from 84 A. pretoriensis specimens collected throughout Grande Comore. Haplotypes were named H1-H7 and color coded. (B) Geographic distribution of COI haplotypes; haplotype H1 was present in all but one site. (C) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 7 COI haplotypes found in Grande Comore and 12 COI A. pretoriensis sequences from specimens collected from continental Africa. Anopheles gambiae and A. stephensi were included as outgroup species. Branch values indicate supported bootstrap values (>70).
Insects 14 00014 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campos, M.; Patel, N.; Marshall, C.; Gripkey, H.; Ditter, R.E.; Crepeau, M.W.; Toilibou, A.; Amina, Y.; Cornel, A.J.; Lee, Y.; et al. Population Genetics of Anopheles pretoriensis in Grande Comore Island. Insects 2023, 14, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010014

AMA Style

Campos M, Patel N, Marshall C, Gripkey H, Ditter RE, Crepeau MW, Toilibou A, Amina Y, Cornel AJ, Lee Y, et al. Population Genetics of Anopheles pretoriensis in Grande Comore Island. Insects. 2023; 14(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campos, Melina, Nikita Patel, Carly Marshall, Hans Gripkey, Robert E. Ditter, Marc W. Crepeau, Ali Toilibou, Yssouf Amina, Anthony J. Cornel, Yoosook Lee, and et al. 2023. "Population Genetics of Anopheles pretoriensis in Grande Comore Island" Insects 14, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop