Next Article in Journal
Development of DNA Melt Curve Analysis for the Identification of Lepidopteran Pests in Almonds and Pistachios
Previous Article in Journal
Eugenol and Thymol Derivatives as Antifeedant Agents against Red Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) Larvae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CRISPR-Mediated Endogenous Activation of Fibroin Heavy Chain Gene Triggers Cellular Stress Responses in Bombyx mori Embryonic Cells

1
State Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Biological Science Research Center, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Sericulture Science, Chongqing Engineering and Technology Research Center for Novel Silk Materials, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(6), 552; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060552
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 2 June 2021 / Accepted: 9 June 2021 / Published: 13 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Molecular Biology and Genomics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Based on a CRISPRa approach, activating endogenous fibroin heavy chain (FibH) gene expression in Bombyx mori embryonic (BmE) cells, which was driven by a combination of the dCas9-VPR (a tripartite activator, composed of VP64, p65, and Rta) and the sgRNA targeting to the promoter of FibH gene, was performed for investigating the biological roles of FibH in the development of silk gland cells. The activation of the endogenous FibH gene lead to up-regulation of cellular stress responses-related genes, which suggested a significant positive correlation between activated FibH gene expression and cellular stress responses. Moreover, the present findings might provide a potential model for studying the cellular stress responses caused by silk secretion disorder and lay a foundation for the understanding of silk gland development in silk-spinning insects.

Abstract

The silkworm Bombyx mori is an economically important insect, as it is the main producer of silk. Fibroin heavy chain (FibH) gene, encoding the core component of silk protein, is specifically and highly expressed in silk gland cells but not in the other cells. Although the silkworm FibH gene has been well studied in transcriptional regulation, its biological functions in the development of silk gland cells remain elusive. In this study, we constructed a CRISPRa system to activate the endogenous transcription of FibH in Bombyx mori embryonic (BmE) cells, and the mRNA expression of FibH was successfully activated. In addition, we found that FibH expression was increased to a maximum at 60 h after transient transfection of sgRNA/dCas9-VPR at a molar ratio of 9:1. The qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression levels of cellular stress response-related genes were significantly up-regulated along with activated FibH gene. Moreover, the lyso-tracker red and monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining assays revealed an apparent appearance of autophagy in FibH-activated BmE cells. Therefore, we conclude that the activation of FibH gene leads to up-regulation of cellular stress responses-related genes in BmE cells, which is essential for understanding silk gland development and the fibroin secretion process in B. mori.

1. Introduction

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), a bacterial adaptive immune system, has been harnessed as a highly efficient genome editing platform and widely used to generate target mutations in an increasing number of organisms, including bacteria [1,2], plant [3,4,5], insect [6,7,8], zebrafish [9,10], and human [11,12,13]. In our previous studies, the CRISPR/Cas9 was successfully used as a genome editing tool in both Bombyx mori (B. mori) individuals and cultured cells [14,15,16]. Meanwhile, the dCas9, a mutant of Cas9 lacking detectable nuclease activity, has been developed to interfere or activate the gene expression instead of complete knockout, by fusing to a transcriptional repressive or activating domain [17]. The VPR activating domain is a tripartite activator composed of the VP64, p65, and Rta activators, which has also been fused to dCas9 [18]. Our previous work indicated that dCas9-VPR is sufficient to activate the expression of target genes in B. mori embryonic (BmE) cells [19].
The silkworm B. mori is an economically important insect, as it is the main producer of silk and a model organism for lepidopterans [20]. The silk gland is the unique organ for producing, storing, and processing silk fibers. The development of silk glands and the synthesis of silk proteins are two important processes to study in silkworm [21,22,23]. Silkworm cocoons are made of sericins and fibroins [23,24]. The sericins are a family of adhesive proteins that account for 25–30% weight of a cocoon, the rest are fibroins. The fibroin unit consists of six sets of disulfide-linked fibroin heavy (FibH, 350 kDa) and light (FibL, 25 kDa) chains with a fibrohexamerin protein (P25, 30 kDa) at a molar ratio of 6:6:1 [25,26]. Additionally, studies have revealed that the formation of disulfide linkage between FibH and FibL is important for the efficient secretion of fibroin from silk gland cells into the lumen [27,28,29]. Additionally, once the FibH fails to form a complete fibroin unit, it cannot be secreted out of the cells, and then leads to a silk gland atrophy [26,30].
B. mori fibroin-deficient mutants are valuable resources for studying the process of fibroin synthesis and secretion in the silk gland [20]. In a previous study, we found that deficient FibH perturbed the cellular homeostasis and caused posterior silk gland (PSG) cell atrophy in the fibroin-deficient naked pupa (Nd) mutant [31,32]. However, the molecular mechanism remains unclear. The FibH is a single copy gene in the B. mori genome, and over 90% of its encoding region is a highly repetitive GC-rich sequence, making it extremely hard to clone and to implement transgenic manipulation. The expression of FibH gene was completely closed in normal BmE cells. In this study, we used the CRISPRa system to specifically activate FibH gene expression in BmE cells. Then, we investigated the cellular stress responses caused by the ectopic activation of FibH through qRT-PCR and cell staining. The results show that cellular stress responses were significantly triggered in the FibH-activated BmE cells, which provided novel insight into the understanding of silk gland development and silk secretion process in silkworm B. mori.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Vector Construction

The dCas9 expression vector (pUC57-hr3/A4-dCas9) and sgRNA backbone vector (pUC57-U6-sgRNA) were produced by our laboratory. Codon-optimized effector domain VPR (1602 bp) was synthesized and inserted into pUC57-T-simple by a commercial service (Genescript, Nanjing, China). Transcriptional activator VPR was then fused to the C-terminal of dCas9 (4194 bp) via SphI and HindIII digestion and T4 ligation as described previously [18,19,33]. The dCas9-VPR was driven by an hr3/A4 promoter (1711 bp) to construct the pUC57-A4-dCas9-VPR expression vector (8002 bp). Three sgRNA targeting the FibH promoter and a negative control sgRNA targeting an EGFP exon were synthesized as oligomers, then annealed and cloned into the sgRNA expression vector pUC57-U6-sgRNA (3678 bp) by using BbsI digestion and T4 ligation. Sequences of sgRNAs are listed in Table S1.

2.2. Cell Transfection

BmE is a B. mori embryonic cell line [34] cultured in Grace medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 27 °C. pUC57-A4-dCas9-VPR and pUC57-U6-sgRNA expression vectors (a total of 2.0 μg plasmids) were co-transfected into BmE cells, at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well, using X-treme GENE Transfection Reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

2.3. Western Blot Assay

Forty-eight hours after transfection, proteins were extracted from BmE cells with NP-40 lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing the protease inhibitor phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The protein concentration was measured using the BCA assay (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Protein samples (20 μg) were separated using 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) protein gel, and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, USA). Subsequently, samples were treated with primary antibodies (Cas9/tubulin-specific antibody, 1:10,000) for 120 min at 37 °C before incubation for 60 min at 37 °C with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-coupled secondary sheep anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:20,000). Finally, the signal was detected with Pierce enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, New York, NY, USA).

2.4. Total RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted from the BmE cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed on total RNA (1 μg) using a random primer (N6), an oligo (dT) primer, and the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit using gDNA Eraser (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.5. Quantitative RT-PCR

The qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocols and a qTOWER 2.0 real-time PCR system (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). The silkworm housekeeping gene ribosomal protein L3 (Rpl3: GenBank accession number NM_001043661.1) was used as the internal control for RNA normalization. Primer sets for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2. Three independent replicates were analyzed.

2.6. Autophagy Assay

Cell autophagy was assessed using 200 μM monodansylcadaverine (MDC, Sigma, USA) staining for 60 min at 27 °C and 200 nM Lyso-Tracker Red DND-99 (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) staining for 30 min at 27 °C. Confocal images were captured using an FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical differences were evaluated by Student’s t-test for unpaired samples. The level of statistically significant difference was set at * p value < 0.05, ** p value < 0.01, and *** p value < 0.001.

3. Results

3.1. Construction of dCas9 and sgRNA Expression System

The nuclease-null dCas9 protein was obtained by mutating spCas9 protein at two sites, D10A and H840A [17]. In a previous study, we tested both CRISPR activation and CRISPR interference vector system in silkworm cells [19,35]. As shown in Figure 1A, the codon-optimized dCas9 with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a tripartite activator (VPR; composed of VP64, p65, and Rta) at the C-terminus was driven by the promoter hr3/A4. We designed three single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting the early upstream of the FibH gene which followed the GN(19)NGG sgRNA designing principle [11,12,36,37], and then the sgRNAs were cloned into the pUC57-U6-sgRNA vector. In this vector, U6 promoter was used to initiate the transcription of sgRNA scaffold (Figure 1B). The expression of dCas9-VPR in BmE cells at 48 h after transfection was confirmed using Western blot (Figure 1C), suggesting that the dCas9-VPR protein was successfully translated in BmE cells.

3.2. The Endogenous FibH Gene of BmE Cells Was Activated by CRISPRa System

The transcription of FibH gene was extremely low in normal BmE cells (Figure 2A). To activate the FibH gene’s expression, we first designed three sgRNAs for the transcription start site (TSS) of FibH gene, where sgRNA-FibHT1, sgRNA-FibHT2, and sgRNA-FibHT3 were located at −392 to −370, −42 to −21, and −12 to +10 positions, respectively (Table S1). Then, two plasmids (dCas9-VPR vector and one of the sgRNA vectors) were co-transfected into BmE cells, and we found that sgRNA-FibHT1 exhibited the highest target gene (FibH) activation effect compared with sgRNA-FibHT2, sgRNA-FibHT3, and sgRNA-EGFP (negative control) on the basis of dCas9-VPR expression (Figure 2A). Next, BmE cell were transfected with different ratio of sgRNA and dCas9-VPR (9:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:9), and the FibH expression increased to the maximum level at the ratio of 9:1 (Figure 2B).

3.3. Cellular Stress Responses-Related Genes Were Significantly Up-Regulated

Firstly, we investigated the time-course transcriptional profiling of the FibH gene after transient transfection of sgRNA-FibHT1 and dCas9-VPR at the ratio of 9:1, every 12 h over 72 h. Sixty hours after transfection, the FibH expression level increased to maximum, which is about 160 times that of the control level (Figure 3A). In previous study, we found that secretion-deficient and high-molecular-weight FibH was able to perturb cellular homeostasis [31,32], which might actuate cellular stress responses, such as autophagy, ubiquitin-proteasome proteolysis and heat shock response [38]. Next, we investigated the mRNA levels of autophagy gene (Atg8, a marker gene of autophagic activity [39]), ubiquitin-proteasome system-related genes (E2 and E3), heat shock response-related genes (Hsp19.9 and Hsp70), and apoptosis-related genes (Caspase1, Caspase4, Dredd, Dronc, and ICE) at 60 h after transfection by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 3B, the mRNA levels of the Atg8 exhibit a tendency of increase from 48 to 72 h, and showed the most significant difference at the 60 h, the same time when FibH expression level increased to a maximum, in FibH-activated BmE cells. Consistent with this, the mRNA levels of E2, E3, Hsp19.9 and Hsp70 were also up-regulated (Figure 3C,D). However, none of apoptosis-related genes was up-regulated in FibH-activated BmE cells (Figure 3E).
Meanwhile, we activated expression of another endogenous fibroin gene (P25) by CRISPRa system, when the mRNA level of P25 increased to over 500-fold compared to control (125-fold compared to FibH maximum) (Figure S1A), the mRNA levels of Atg8 showed no significant difference compared to control (Figure S1B), suggesting that activation of P25, even at a much higher level of expression than that of FibH, did not lead to up-regulation of the marker gene of autophagy Atg8.

3.4. Autophagy Was Triggered in FibH-Activated BmE Cells

To confirm whether the activated FibH gene triggered cellular stress responses, we performed autophagy assay through cell staining. The FibH-activated BmE cells were positively stained red by lyso-tracker red (a dye used to label acidic lysosomes) (Figure 4A) and were also positively stained blue using monodansylcadaverine (MDC, a compound used to label acidic endosomes, lysosomes and autophagosomes) (Figure 4B). Both staining results show that autophagy occurred in more than 60% of the cells after FibH activation, but less than 10% in the control. These results suggest that the autophagy was strongly triggered in the FibH-activated BmE cells.

4. Discussion

The development of silk gland cells and regulation of the fibroin gene are two crucial issues in silkworm studies [21,22,23]. B. mori fibroin-deficient mutants are well-known genetic resources to study the silk production process [28,29,31,32]. Deficient fibroin proteins caused by fibroin gene (FibH or FibL) variations in these mutants interrupt the silk production process [27,28,29,32]. To understand how deficient fibroin proteins regulate the downstream factors and their biological functions in the development of silk gland cells, we constructed a CRISPRa system to activate the transcription of endogenous FibH gene of BmE cells. We found that the cellular stress response-related genes and autophagy were triggered when FibH was activated.
The VPR activating domain used in the study has been reported to have great potential for its use in regulating gene expression in BmE cells and silkworm individuals [19]. We are the first to use dCas9-VPR to activate FibH gene expression in BmE cells, and we found a condition of transfection (sgRNA and dCas9-VPR vectors with a 9:1 molar ratio; cell culture for 60 h) for maximizing target gene expression (Figure 2A,B and Figure 3A). We proposed that the reason causing this unequal transfection ratio of sgRNA: dCas9 might be the difference of driving efficiency between the hr3/A4 and U6 promoters in BmE cells.
Previous studies of silks revealed that terminal domains are highly important for the assembly of silk proteins [40,41,42]. The FibH gene, encoding a high-molecular-weight (350 kDa) structural protein of fibroin with no catalytic or regulatory function, has a tissue-specific expression pattern in PSG cells and is completely closed in non-silk gland cells [43]. Once the fibroin fails to form the fibroin unit (FibH-FibL-P25 complex), it cannot be secreted out of the cells, which leads to the PSG atrophy [26,30]. The mutant/misfolded/aggregated fibroin proteins can perturb cellular homeostasis and endanger the cells under severe stress conditions. Therefore, the stressed cells initiate adaptive responses aiming at reducing damage to the cells, such as a decrease in global protein translation and an increase in proteins of the proteolytic system [38,44,45,46]. These cellular stress responses were also observed in FibH knock-out silkworms using CRISPR/Cas9 system [47]. The loss-of-function mutation caused an accumulation of abnormal FibH protein and aroused the activation of proteasomes as well as autophagy process in the silk gland cells [47], which was consistent with our results for the autophagy assay and suggested that accumulation of secretion-deficient (abnormal or mutant) FibH protein in the silk gland cells might lead to more activation of autophagy process to promote the rapid degradation of such abnormal proteins and in cells. Thus, we suspected that the cellular stress responses might be caused by the secretion-deficient fibroin protein that is encoded by the CRISPR-activated FibH gene in BmE cells, further raising the possibility that secretion-deficient FibH was responsible for the PSG cell atrophy in fibroin-deficient B. mori mutants. Interestingly, none of the genes related to apoptosis were up-regulated in FibH-activated BmE cells (Figure 3E). We inferred that there might be two reasons leading to this phenomenon: (i) the amount of FibH in BmE cells was not sufficient to induce apoptosis; (ii) the FibH-activated BmE cell had not reached the time needed to induce apoptosis. The detailed mechanism needs to be further studied.
Our study showed a significant positive correlation between activated FibH gene expression and cellular stress responses. Importantly, this might provide a potential model for studying the autophagy caused by a high-molecular-weight protein and lay a foundation for the understanding of silk gland development in silk-spinning insects.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects12060552/s1, Table S1: Single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences, Table S2: Primer sets for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.H. and Q.X.; methodology, W.H.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, Z.P.; resources, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H.; writing—review and editing, Q.X.; visualization, Y.C.; supervision, Q.X.; project administration, Q.X.; funding acquisition, Q.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the key program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31530071), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000340), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU120082).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, W.Y.; Bikard, D.; Cox, D.; Zhang, F.; Marraffini, L.A. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arroyo-Olarte, R.D.; Bravo Rodriguez, R.; Morales-Rios, E. Genome Editing in Bacteria: CRISPR-Cas and Beyond. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gao, J.P.; Wang, G.H.; Ma, S.Y.; Xie, X.D.; Wu, X.W.; Zhang, X.T.; Wu, Y.Q.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q.Y. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2015, 87, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gao, J.; Zhang, T.; Xu, B.; Jia, L.; Xiao, B.; Liu, H.; Liu, L.; Yan, H.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase 8 (CCD8) in Tobacco Affects Shoot and Root Architecture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhu, H.; Li, C.; Gao, C. Applications of CRISPR-Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 661–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bassett, A.R.; Tibbit, C.; Ponting, C.P.; Liu, J.L. Highly Efficient Targeted Mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yu, Z.S.; Ren, M.D.; Wang, Z.X.; Zhang, B.; Rong, Y.K.S.; Jiao, R.J.; Gao, G.J. Highly Efficient Genome Modifications Mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in Drosophila. Genetics 2013, 195, 289–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gantz, V.M.; Akbari, O.S. Gene editing technologies and applications for insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018, 28, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hruscha, A.; Krawitz, P.; Rechenberg, A.; Heinrich, V.; Hecht, J.; Haass, C.; Schmid, B. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish. Development 2013, 140, 4982–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jao, L.E.; Wente, S.R.; Chen, W.B. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13904–13909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cong, L.; Ran, F.A.; Cox, D.; Lin, S.L.; Barretto, R.; Habib, N.; Hsu, P.D.; Wu, X.B.; Jiang, W.Y.; Marraffini, L.A.; et al. Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science 2013, 339, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mali, P.; Yang, L.H.; Esvelt, K.M.; Aach, J.; Guell, M.; DiCarlo, J.E.; Norville, J.E.; Church, G.M. RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9. Science 2013, 339, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kampmann, M. CRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Y.Y.; Ma, S.Y.; Wang, X.G.; Chang, J.S.; Gao, J.; Shi, R.; Zhang, J.D.; Lu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, P.; et al. Highly efficient multiplex targeted mutagenesis and genomic structure variation in Bombyx mori cells using CRISPR/Cas9. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 49, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, S.; Chang, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lu, W.; Gao, J.; Shi, R.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated multiplex genome editing and heritable mutagenesis of BmKu70 in Bombyx mori. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ma, S.Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.Y.; Chang, J.S.; Zhang, T.; Wang, X.G.; Shi, R.; Lu, W.; Xia, X.J.; Zhao, P.; et al. An integrated CRISPR Bombyx mori genome editing system with improved efficiency and expanded target sites. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 83, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qi, L.S.; Larson, M.H.; Gilbert, L.A.; Doudna, J.A.; Weissman, J.S.; Arkin, A.P.; Lim, W.A. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression. Cell 2013, 152, 1173–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Chavez, A.; Scheiman, J.; Vora, S.; Pruitt, B.W.; Tuttle, M.; Iyer, E.P.R.; Lin, S.; Kiani, S.; Guzman, C.D.; Wiegand, D.J.; et al. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, U326–U365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, X.G.; Ma, S.Y.; Chang, J.S.; Shi, R.; Wang, R.L.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q.Y. Programmable activation of Bombyx gene expression using CRISPR/dCas9 fusion systems. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goldsmith, M.R.; Shimada, T.; Abe, H. The genetics and genomics of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005, 50, 71–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Omenetto, F.G.; Kaplan, D.L. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 2010, 329, 528–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Shao, Z.; Vollrath, F. Surprising strength of silkworm silk. Nature 2002, 418, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xia, Q.; Li, S.; Feng, Q. Advances in silkworm studies accelerated by the genome sequencing of Bombyx mori. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59, 513–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andersson, M.; Johansson, J.; Rising, A. Silk Spinning in Silkworms and Spiders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Aramwit, P.; Siritientong, T.; Srichana, T. Potential applications of silk sericin, a natural protein from textile industry by-products. Waste Manag. Res. 2012, 30, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Inoue, S.; Tanaka, K.; Arisaka, F.; Kimura, S.; Ohtomo, K.; Mizuno, S. Silk fibroin of Bombyx mori is secreted, assembling a high molecular mass elementary unit consisting of H-chain, L-chain, and P25, with a 6:6:1 molar ratio. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 40517–40528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Takei, F.; Kikuchi, Y.; Kikuchi, A.; Mizuno, S.; Shimura, K. Further evidence for importance of the subunit combination of silk fibroin in its efficient secretion from the posterior silk gland cells. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 105, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mori, K.; Tanaka, K.; Kikuchi, Y.; Waga, M.; Waga, S.; Mizuno, S. Production of a chimeric fibroin light-chain polypeptide in a fibroin secretion-deficient naked pupa mutant of the silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 251, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tanaka, K.; Kajiyama, N.; Ishikura, K.; Waga, S.; Kikuchi, A.; Ohtomo, K.; Takagi, T.; Mizuno, S. Determination of the site of disulfide linkage between heavy and light chains of silk fibroin produced by Bombyx mori. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1999, 1432, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inoue, S.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, H.; Ohtomo, K.; Kanda, T.; Imamura, M.; Quan, G.X.; Kojima, K.; Yamashita, T.; Nakajima, T.; et al. Assembly of the silk fibroin elementary unit in endoplasmic reticulum and a role of L-chain for protection of alpha1,2-mannose residues in N-linked oligosaccharide chains of fibrohexamerin/P25. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Hu, W.; Chen, Y.; Lin, Y.; Xia, Q. Developmental and transcriptomic features characterize defects of silk gland growth and silk production in silkworm naked pupa mutant. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 111, 103175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, W.; Lu, W.; Wei, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, Q. Molecular nature of dominant naked pupa mutation reveals novel insights into silk production in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 109, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gilbert, L.A.; Larson, M.H.; Morsut, L.; Liu, Z.; Brar, G.A.; Torres, S.E.; Stern-Ginossar, N.; Brandman, O.; Whitehead, E.H.; Doudna, J.A.; et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 2013, 154, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pan, M.H.; Xiao, S.Q.; Chen, M.; Hong, X.J.; Lu, C. Establishment and characterization of two embryonic cell lines of Bombyx mori. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2007, 43, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Ma, S.; Liu, Y.; Lu, W.; Sun, L.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Transcriptional repression of endogenous genes in BmE cells using CRISPRi system. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 111, 103172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cho, S.W.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, J.S. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012, 337, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Buchberger, A.; Bukau, B.; Sommer, T. Protein quality control in the cytosol and the endoplasmic reticulum: Brothers in arms. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 238–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, X.; Hu, Z.Y.; Li, W.F.; Li, Q.R.; Deng, X.J.; Yang, W.Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, C.Z. Systematic cloning and analysis of autophagy-related genes from the silkworm Bombyx mori. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Eisoldt, L.; Thamm, C.; Scheibel, T. Review the role of terminal domains during storage and assembly of spider silk proteins. Biopolymers 2012, 97, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. He, Y.X.; Zhang, N.N.; Li, W.F.; Jia, N.; Chen, B.Y.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, C.Z. N-Terminal domain of Bombyx mori fibroin mediates the assembly of silk in response to pH decrease. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 418, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, C.Z.; Confalonieri, F.; Medina, N.; Zivanovic, Y.; Esnault, C.; Yang, T.; Jacquet, M.; Janin, J.; Duguet, M.; Perasso, R.; et al. Fine organization of Bombyx mori fibroin heavy chain gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 2413–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Hu, W.; Liu, C.; Cheng, T.; Li, W.; Wang, N.; Xia, Q. Histomorphometric and transcriptomic features characterize silk glands’ development during the molt to intermolt transition process in silkworm. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 76, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ellgaard, L.; Helenius, A. Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gawron, K. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in chondrodysplasias caused by mutations in collagen types II and X. Cell Stress Chaperones 2016, 21, 943–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Goldberg, A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 2003, 426, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cui, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Chen, L.; Feng, Q.; Wang, W.; Xiang, H. New insight into the mechanism underlying the silk gland biological process by knocking out fibroin heavy chain in the silkworm. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. CRISPRa system in BmE cells. (A) CRISPR/dCas9 gene activation system. The codon-optimized dCas9 was initiated with hr3/A4 promoter. A nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a tripartite activator (VPR; composed of VP64, p65, and Rta) were fused to the C terminal of dCas9. (B) Single guide RNA (sgRNA) target site in the FibH promoter region. The sgRNA scaffold was under the control of a U6 promoter. TSS, transcription start site; BmE, Bombyx mori embryonic cells. (C) Western blot analysis of dCas9-VPR protein. The VPR activation domains was fused to dCas9 and tubulin was used as control.
Figure 1. CRISPRa system in BmE cells. (A) CRISPR/dCas9 gene activation system. The codon-optimized dCas9 was initiated with hr3/A4 promoter. A nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a tripartite activator (VPR; composed of VP64, p65, and Rta) were fused to the C terminal of dCas9. (B) Single guide RNA (sgRNA) target site in the FibH promoter region. The sgRNA scaffold was under the control of a U6 promoter. TSS, transcription start site; BmE, Bombyx mori embryonic cells. (C) Western blot analysis of dCas9-VPR protein. The VPR activation domains was fused to dCas9 and tubulin was used as control.
Insects 12 00552 g001
Figure 2. Transcriptional activation of FibH gene in BmE cells. (A) Relative mRNA levels of FibH gene at the 48 h after transient transfection of the combination of dCas9-VPR with sgRNA-FibHT1, sgRNA-FibHT2, sgRNA-FibHT3, sgRNA-FibHT1 + 2 + 3, and sgRNA-EGFP, respectively. (B) Relative mRNA levels of FibH gene at the 48 h after transient transfection of a combination of sgRNA-FibHT1 with dCas9-VPR in the transfection ratios of 9:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:9, respectively. Expression of the silkworm housekeeping gene ribosomal protein L3 (Rpl3) was used as a control. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences determined by a Student’s t-test at p value < 0.01 (**).
Figure 2. Transcriptional activation of FibH gene in BmE cells. (A) Relative mRNA levels of FibH gene at the 48 h after transient transfection of the combination of dCas9-VPR with sgRNA-FibHT1, sgRNA-FibHT2, sgRNA-FibHT3, sgRNA-FibHT1 + 2 + 3, and sgRNA-EGFP, respectively. (B) Relative mRNA levels of FibH gene at the 48 h after transient transfection of a combination of sgRNA-FibHT1 with dCas9-VPR in the transfection ratios of 9:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:9, respectively. Expression of the silkworm housekeeping gene ribosomal protein L3 (Rpl3) was used as a control. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences determined by a Student’s t-test at p value < 0.01 (**).
Insects 12 00552 g002
Figure 3. Expression profiles of FibH and cellular stress responses-related genes. (A,B) Relative mRNA levels of FibH (A) and Atg8 (B) after transient transfection of a combination of sgRNA-FibHT1 with dCas9-VPR in the transfection ratio of 9:1, every 12 over 72 h. (CE) Relative mRNA levels of ubiquitin-proteasome system-related genes (C), heat shock response-related genes (D), and apoptosis-related genes (E) at the 60 h in FibH-activated BmE cells. Expression of the silkworm housekeeping gene ribosomal protein L3 (Rpl3) was used as a control. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences determined by a Student’s t-test at p value < 0.05 (*), p value < 0.01 (**), and p value < 0.001 (***).
Figure 3. Expression profiles of FibH and cellular stress responses-related genes. (A,B) Relative mRNA levels of FibH (A) and Atg8 (B) after transient transfection of a combination of sgRNA-FibHT1 with dCas9-VPR in the transfection ratio of 9:1, every 12 over 72 h. (CE) Relative mRNA levels of ubiquitin-proteasome system-related genes (C), heat shock response-related genes (D), and apoptosis-related genes (E) at the 60 h in FibH-activated BmE cells. Expression of the silkworm housekeeping gene ribosomal protein L3 (Rpl3) was used as a control. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences determined by a Student’s t-test at p value < 0.05 (*), p value < 0.01 (**), and p value < 0.001 (***).
Insects 12 00552 g003
Figure 4. Autophagy assay of FibH-activated BmE cells. (A,B) Lyso-tracker staining (A) and the monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining (B) of BmE cells at the 60 h after the condition of transient transfection of a combination of sgRNA-FibHT1 with dcas9-VPR in the transfection ratio of 9:1. The lysosome is signaled in red. The autophagic cell is signaled in blue. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant difference determined by Student’s t-test at p value < 0.01 (**).
Figure 4. Autophagy assay of FibH-activated BmE cells. (A,B) Lyso-tracker staining (A) and the monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining (B) of BmE cells at the 60 h after the condition of transient transfection of a combination of sgRNA-FibHT1 with dcas9-VPR in the transfection ratio of 9:1. The lysosome is signaled in red. The autophagic cell is signaled in blue. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant difference determined by Student’s t-test at p value < 0.01 (**).
Insects 12 00552 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, W.; Wang, X.; Ma, S.; Peng, Z.; Cao, Y.; Xia, Q. CRISPR-Mediated Endogenous Activation of Fibroin Heavy Chain Gene Triggers Cellular Stress Responses in Bombyx mori Embryonic Cells. Insects 2021, 12, 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060552

AMA Style

Hu W, Wang X, Ma S, Peng Z, Cao Y, Xia Q. CRISPR-Mediated Endogenous Activation of Fibroin Heavy Chain Gene Triggers Cellular Stress Responses in Bombyx mori Embryonic Cells. Insects. 2021; 12(6):552. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Wenbo, Xiaogang Wang, Sanyuan Ma, Zhangchuan Peng, Yang Cao, and Qingyou Xia. 2021. "CRISPR-Mediated Endogenous Activation of Fibroin Heavy Chain Gene Triggers Cellular Stress Responses in Bombyx mori Embryonic Cells" Insects 12, no. 6: 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060552

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop